/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.3955277]

How much do you forgive anatomical inaccuracy?

The proportions in pic related are ridiculous with 75% of the figure's height being taken up legs but aesthetically it all seems to come together quite nicely.

[Anonymous No.3955280]

if I notice it within the first few seconds of glancing over the picture I can't really forgive it.
if I gotta look, and when I do I can't un-see, it depends on context. if I can un-see then who cares lol

[Anonymous No.3955282]

>>3955277
It’s called exaggeration you dumb faggot

[Anonymous No.3955283]

The anatomy on that looks unrealistic and awful from the tiny arms to the impossibly small waist and weird shoulders Literally sakimichan tier.

[Anonymous No.3955285]

>>3955277
You can do whatever the fuck you want as long as you "sell it" in the final picture.

If it's a clumsy, awkward attempt at naturalism (or some /beg/ tier cartoon/anime that doesn't know what the fuck it's doing) that just ends up fucking it up, then yeah, it sticks out like a sore thumb.

[Anonymous No.3955289]

>>3955277
dude what

[Anonymous No.3955292]

>>3955277
>Nike worship
FUCKING

S
T
O
P

[Anonymous No.3955296]

>>3955277
>with 75% of the figure's height being taken up legs
Either I'm blind or what but I count only 4.5 heads in legs to around 4 in torso.

[Anonymous No.3955297]

>>3955296
You are, it's about 3/6.5 you blind fuck

[Anonymous No.3955302]

>>3955297
From where are you counting? The belt? Her crotch is at the same level as her left hand.

[Anonymous No.3955311]

>>3955277
>How much do you forgive anatomical inaccuracy?
Your question is pointless /ic/ does not forgive anything.

Normal people do however.

[Anonymous No.3955399]

>>3955311
>dubs of truth

[Anonymous No.3955401]

>>3955311
>>3955399

[Anonymous No.3955402]

>>3955311
>>3955399
based

[Anonymous No.3955652]

>>3955277
okay... what am i doing wrong here..

[Anonymous No.3955680]

this is a mistake too many of you faggots make

the artists didnt fuck up by drawing the anatomy that way, they chose to make legs longer because women look more slender and attractive with longer legs and for the case of design for games, longer legs are better for animation. look at overwatch concept art or league of legends splash art. these are some of the best character designers in the world drawing for the worlds biggest games, the so called anatomic inaccuracy is 100% intended and harping on the loomis 8 heads diagram wont get you any where. i had an art mentor that owns a small concept art contract studio in LA, and for one of my assignments i copied a real life nude model and made it into a viking design. by the time the piece was finished the legs were about 35% longer after he redlined for me despite the fact that i pretty much copied the most realistic anatomy possible

[Anonymous No.3955689]

>>3955289
Are you retarded?

[Anonymous No.3955691]

>>3955277
these bad proportions really ruin the artwork.

[Anonymous No.3955692]

>>3955680
>unga bunga
there's voluntary exaggeration that emphasizes appeal and there's mistakes. OP is a mistake.

[Anonymous No.3955693]

>>3955277
I don't real care about anatomical accuracy as long as the character is visually consistent. Anatomical accuracy is only necessary if you're going for realism, which is a style and not a rule.

[Anonymous No.3955714]

It’s just a style and it shouldn’t criticized. Street Fighter makes there characters have huge feet and hands, even the girls. Aion Flux drew character 8-9 heads tall with zero body fat that ended up making people look like malnourished zombies. The Incredibles have crazy ass body types. And all of these things worked.

Shit look at pic related. This was a character in one of Pixar’s shorts called Inner Workings. Dat ass is insane. Pixar’s just had to one up Ms incredible.

[Anonymous No.3955725]

It triggers me when someone has bad anatomy but nice rendering since normies only care about shiny colors

[Anonymous No.3955735]

>>3955714
>That giga chad behind her.

[Anonymous No.3955737]

>>3955277
Aesthetically pleasing and/or full of soul > > > > Anatomically correct.

If the art is done well and does its job I'm not going to complaing that "legs are too long" or "hands are too small".

[Anonymous No.3955760]

>>3955289
lmaoooo

[Anonymous No.3955781]

>>3955735
Lol

[Anonymous No.3955879]

>>3955277
Copefags are always funny.
the best joke is that they could get good if they stopped bitching and worked to prove you could do better

[Anonymous No.3955884]

>>3955680
this anons knows his shit. slightly long leg = top tier

[Anonymous No.3955887]

>>3955277
omg look at this bad anatomy?!!

[Anonymous No.3955896]

>>3955692
>Implying you would know the difference

[Anonymous No.3955901]

>>3955887
Silly cartoonists, did they even read Loomis? Hehehe

[Anonymous No.3955909]

>>3955652
From what I could tell (I am /beg/ tier), her right arm looks a bit too long and the body looks rigid. This might be helped by trying to draw a line of action and altering the body so.

[Anonymous No.3955930]

>>3955292
okay poorfag lmao

[Anonymous No.3956333]

IT'S MY STYLE

[Anonymous No.3956336]

>>3956333

They look like a future descendant of Homo Sapiens.

[Anonymous No.3956338]

>>3956333
I like this shit right here

[Anonymous No.3956339]

>>3955909
>(I am /beg/ tier)
okay then stop talking mr.dunning kruger

[Anonymous No.3956340]

>>3956336

[Anonymous No.3956417]

is she a mutant?

[Anonymous No.3956421]

>>3955652
Right arm is way too long.

[Anonymous No.3956802]

>>3955277
>what is sylization

[Anonymous No.3956809]

>>3956417
your anatomy is so off
also
>not knowing necks can turn and bend

[Anonymous No.3956810]

>>3956417
Your lines over it are much more incorrect than the art itself, holy shit.

[Anonymous No.3956820]

>>3955652
Drawing. Thats what you are doing wrong

[Anonymous No.3956828]

Anatomy is a tool which should be used to communicate what you want. Bend it, break it, invent your own muscles for the sake of an appealing shape or whatever, it's all good. Remember, no rules, just tools.

[Anonymous No.3956926]

>>3956333

But It is a style, anon. Those are fashion proportions.

[Anonymous No.3956965]

>>3955652
I like it anon. You missed the head tilting up though.

[Anonymous No.3957037]

>>3955652
yours unironically better
soulless vs. soul
also your perspective on the tilt of the torso and arm are actually more accurate, same with retarded right hand

[Anonymous No.3957116]

>>3955277
>75% legs
>top of the femur is slightly below half the figure's head.
Glad you're not an engineer or architect.

[Anonymous No.3957125]

>>3956417
I think you're the one with an extra chromosome

[Anonymous No.3957423]

>>3957116
>what is a hyperbole

[Anonymous No.3957427]

>>3956333
>"Hold the the fuck up"

[Anonymous No.3957443]

>>3955680
damn her legs do look strangely long just looking now

[Anonymous No.3957461]

Only self-claimed artists care about anatomical correctness.

[Anonymous No.3957574]

>>3956926
>bayo

[Anonymous No.3957788]

>>3956809
>>3956810
>>3957125
You guys are fucking morons.Who ever made that drawing butchered the anatomy so hard the neck starts off from trapezius muscle and its not even the only error there is.Doesnt matter if she turns or bends her neck, the start of the neck should be attached to collar bones from the corrent angle which isnt the case here.Fucking /beg/ tier mongoloids, i swear to god.

[Anonymous No.3957807]

>>3957788

It's simply sad that you feel need to defend your shitty redline.

[Anonymous No.3957812]

>>3957807
How is it sad, you irredeemable faggot?The neck is attached onto a completely wrong spot.If you cant see the overwhelming error here then you are a troglodyte who is ngmi

[Anonymous No.3957813]

>>3955652
torso too twisted, making position of arm look semi impossible

[Anonymous No.3957821]

>>3957812
>The neck is attached onto a completely wrong spot
who gives a fuck? normies are still gonna eat that shit up only turbo autist obsessed with every aspect of the human anatomy will notice and give a fuck.

[Anonymous No.3957827]

>>3957821
Apparently clueless retards gave a few fucks by posting some braindead replies.

[Anonymous No.3957830]

>>3957807
ok

[Anonymous No.3957834]

>>3957827
>Apparently clueless retards gave a few fucks by posting some braindead replies.
>being this asshattered because a drawing isn't 100 percent anatomically correct
you must be a fun guy at parties anon.

[Anonymous No.3957835]

>>3955277
Should have traced a photo instead, what a dumbass.

[Anonymous No.3957839]

>>3957834
gtfo of here if you dont care about fundies fucking gay normalfag

[Anonymous No.3957844]

>>3957839
>gtfo of here if you dont care about fundies fucking gay normalfag
autistic myopic focus on perfect anatomy=/=fundies
your the perfect example of a dunning kruger mate.

[Anonymous No.3957850]

>>3955277
I think it's quite distracting. I don't have image saved that have that degree of stylized anatomy, so I guess it does bother me.

[Anonymous No.3957878]

>>3957844
You have to grasp the fundies to basically do whatever you want with your skills.I am not saying technical skill is enough to do art but its a basic requirement for anyone who is interested in fine arts and its derivations
>hur dur me ignorant me smart
>dunning kruger am i rite
you are a retard

[Anonymous No.3958018]

>>3955277
I can be pretty forgiving if the head and face looks right

[Anonymous No.3958669]

>>3957830
Holy fucking shit this ugly ass mutant oompa loompa you drew