[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 132 KB, 800x842, LPA079_2048x2048.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945231 No.3945231 [Reply] [Original]

I want to step up my anatomy knowledge on the side little by little, but I absolutely no interest in drawing male characters and never do.

Most resources out there always explain things using a male body, and only SOMETIMES if they don't forget about it, you may get some some side pictures for the female body. I'm not here to start a debate about gender equality since I got better to do, but it fucking sucks. It feels like filling my brain with shit I don't want.

Any advice? Are there books or resources out there I could use to exclusively learn anatomy from an actual and ideal female body?

>> No.3945237

>>3945231
fag

>> No.3945239

>>3945237
>ideal female body
extremely problematic

>> No.3945277

>>3945239
A standard one if you prefer.

>> No.3945288
File: 794 KB, 680x742, milk-ducts.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945288

>>3945231
boobs are fucking scary man

>> No.3945297
File: 46 KB, 400x287, 1321572774268.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945297

>>3945288
imagine those bursting and a thousand tiny little spiders covered in milk fly out

>> No.3945312
File: 1.15 MB, 320x240, 1285205322159.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945312

>>3945297
imagine being able to shoot spiders from your boobs...

>> No.3945313
File: 21 KB, 327x383, 1320855069113.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945313

>>3945312
now we're talking

>> No.3945335

>>3945231
God the human body disgusts me.

>> No.3945339

>>3945231

Most figure drawing books cover the differences between men and women. Not sure what you've been reading.

>> No.3945350
File: 300 KB, 1052x3619, 1236053932651.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945350

>>3945313
this is even better than the dick ants.

>> No.3945355

>>3945339
I'm referring to pure anatomy, what's under the skin.

>> No.3945377
File: 44 KB, 400x250, 1521155432250.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945377

>>3945288
>>3945297
>>3945312
All the more reason as to why DFC will forever remain superior. Where the fuck do those milk glands even spawn from?

>> No.3945390
File: 76 KB, 686x735, black-rock-shooter-huke-artbook.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945390

>>3945377
DFC would still have milk glands. Its the adipose tissue that determines breast size.

>> No.3945404

>>3945335
You disgust me

>> No.3945417

>>3945390
You mean to tell us that there's this freaky looking spider nest inside just below the nipples? Godfuckingdammit.

>> No.3945442

>>3945377
>DFC
what's a dfc

>> No.3945445
File: 137 KB, 386x414, 1520675815615.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945445

>>3945442
You need not worry what a DFC is you filthy plebeian.

>> No.3945447

>>3945404
Looks like we have something in common.

>> No.3945455
File: 30 KB, 386x494, 97807360481321_zoom.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945455

>>3945355

Well i'm sure you're aware that men and women have the same superficial muscles. Except for the sexual organs the only difference is in fat distribution and in proportion, which again, is covered in most figure drawing/artistic anatomy books. If you just prefer to look at anatomical illustrations of women then you could try to find a digital copy of this book.

>> No.3945460
File: 1.16 MB, 2310x2732, 80865070c1a6d09d4a05d4c57f0f73ca.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945460

>>3945455

You can find a lot of images from his book if you just google it

>> No.3945461
File: 63 KB, 1004x354, 1273763283418.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945461

>>3945442
Delicious Flat Chest

>> No.3945462
File: 337 KB, 630x823, Lunge.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945462

>>3945460

>> No.3945472

>>3945231
There was a nice anatomy book posted in the artbook thread a while ago that covers women pretty often.
I think part of why you see less focus on women is that women have more fat deposits in general. (a fit woman will have subtler muscles and more softness than a fit man). Muscles are easy to study. They're concrete, they make sense. Fat is soft, squishy, and hard to pin down and construct. Men are a great way to look at muscles since they're big and exaggerated. In women, they're more subtle, fat affects the appearance more. So they are looked at less.

>> No.3945477

>>3945442
>delicious fat cocks

>> No.3945482
File: 114 KB, 1440x869, 58453725_164590391231204_3967683982059333971_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945482

>>3945472

Anatomy for sculptors covers fat distribution

>> No.3945485
File: 717 KB, 245x263, 4828395243.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3945485

>tfw you will never experience cowgirl with a literal muscle girl with 0 body fat/no skin obfuscating her rippling physique
is life even worth living
all these incredible experiences i can think of that will never come true
it hurts me so deeply that i get choked up just thinking about how my cum will never joyfully splash across her smooth abdominal muscles, running sleekly down like rain on a freshly waxed car. my semen will never caress her powerful ligaments and tendons, running over their twine-like textures and seeping into their tight folds
life is stupid

>> No.3945509

>>3945485
Nobody cares

>> No.3945638

>>3945455
Yeah?But why are women weaker then men then?

>> No.3945677

>>3945638

Higher bone density, more muscle mass and fast twitch mucle fibers on average

>> No.3945689

>>3945638
Women have the same muscles, they just have less muscle mass overall, due to lower testosterone etc.

>> No.3945707

>>3945455
It's on the main Russian torrent tracker.

>> No.3945834

>>3945288
That's just a CGI rendering that someone made

It's not really accurate

https://www.sciencealert.com/don-t-freak-out-about-that-viral-milk-duct-image-it-s-not-actually-correct

>> No.3946068

>>3945461
>That image

I'm fucking dying

>> No.3946070

>>3945834

Probably some freelance indian shitter. This is a good example why you should take all anatomical illustrations with a grain of salt

>> No.3946353

>>3945834
So the real one looks even scarier?

>> No.3946357

>>3945231
>exclusively learn anatomy from an actual and ideal female body?
You fucking weirdo.
>always explain things using a male body
Have you looked around? There's so much female anatomy resources especially here. I don't think you looked hard enough. If you're asking this question, then you likely don't even draw.

>> No.3946393

>>3946357
>If you're asking this question, then you likely don't even draw.
If I post on /ic/ that's a given.

>> No.3946395
File: 335 KB, 506x576, front_toroso_&_fat_pads72.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3946395

>> No.3946547

>>3945834
awesome
https://jdc.jefferson.edu/cooper/