Do you agree with these rules, /ic/

[Anonymous No.3883774]

https://twitter.com/copilotsheith/status/1105635739729973248

[Anonymous No.3883775]

>>3883774
read the comments if you want to feel angry/frustrated

[Anonymous No.3883779]

>>3883774
>>3883775
Seems perfectly fine and civil.

[Anonymous No.3883780]

>>3883779
i thought /ic/ is all about critisismsmms? no?

[Anonymous No.3883781]

Isn't criticism supposed to help you improve in making a better product?

[Anonymous No.3883782]

>>3883775
>>3883774
yeah unsolicited criticism signifies social retardation

if they didnt ask, just shut up. youre on social media youre not in art class, either like or dont like

[Anonymous No.3883783]

>>3883780
yeah, on /ic/. this is elsewhere.

[Anonymous No.3883785]

>>3883774
No rules, only tools.

[Anonymous No.3883787]

I don't understand why someone would be bothered by criticism of their art by a stranger. At worst, it's some rando who doesn't like what you do. Big whoop, they aren't attacking you personally.

[Anonymous No.3883790]

>>3883774
The first point I agree with. You shouldn't tell someone what their schedule is. Though you should hint at how you'd like to see more and often.

I agree at the criticism part too. Let shit people stay shit if they don't want criticism. There's a reason anons come here for critique.

I half disagree with the 3rd part. I hate it when people repost art on the same platform without linking back to you. I love it when people post on platforms I don't exist on and credit me too. Free exposure.

Last part I completely disagree with. You shouldn't tell someone their art is good if it isn't.

[Anonymous No.3883791]

>>3883774
I welcome any criticism unprompted or not but I can understand why someone can get upset. If you post on social media you're not doing it for personal artistic growth, you're marketing yourself and you want to make sure your art is presented as nicely as possible. Having some faggot comment that something's wrong with the lighting pretty much kills your drawing. It's already hard enough to get any viewership as it is. I'm NGMI so I don't care but to someone who's trying to get views it's a spanner in the works.
I don't understand what "I don't like X but this is still cool" is, I wouldn't get offended by this comment.
The repost shit is common sense and I wouldn't have a problem as long as you credit. How are you supposed to share art on other sites? Linking the tweet?
Making demands about schedule is OK if you are supporting the artist.

That said
>Sending/linking unprompted porn of people's OCs
would ruin my day, I am deeply attached to my characters.

[Anonymous No.3883794]

>>3883791
>would ruin my day, I am deeply attached to my characters.
Would it? I'm also attached to my OCs and not into smut at all but I'd think nothing of it, since it's not canon.

[Anonymous No.3883803]

>>3883794
I draw smut of my characters too but if someone else draws smut of them it would feel like a violation, you know? Like they're taken from me. I would feel legitimately cucked. And if it's not drawn by me there's a huge chance I'll hate it because it'll be OOC and bad and it would probably spoil the character forever in my eyes. I don't mind regular fanart and I'm really happy of it but I'm extremely autistic about smut.
So when someone sends me fanart I always have a second of panic.

[Anonymous No.3883807]

>>3883803
I completely get you but as you said, it's a bit autistic. I hope you can get over it anon, keep drawing and sharing your stuff!

[Anonymous No.3883808]

>>3883790
>You shouldn't tell someone their art is good if it isn't.
That's not what the point is about, it's saying while you compliment someone's art, it's rude to shit on the content of the art. For example, someone commenting "I don't like [x show] but I still like this fanart" on fanart of that show.

[Anonymous No.3883810]

>>3883808
>someone commenting "I don't like [x show] but I still like this fanart" on fanart of that show.
ohhhhhhhhhh shit, I think I have done this a few times

[Anonymous No.3883847]

>>3883791
>would ruin my day, I am deeply attached to my characters.
15y/o girl?

[Anonymous No.3883850]

2 & 4 are dumb. when you willingly present something you've created to the public getting crits on it is natural. you've put out a product and expecting everyone to suck your dick is entitled af.
>don't like, don't comment
can't take it, don't post it
4 is more of a compliment than anything. if i hate cats, you draw a kickass cat and i like it, your art is so powerful its made me overcome my natural adversion to the subject.

[Anonymous No.3883851]

Fucking clone

[Anonymous No.3883854]

>>3883847
No, and it's the only thing I'm autistic about.

[Anonymous No.3883855]

>>3883850
I'm >>3883810 and whenever I said this it was exactly this, as s compliment.

[Anonymous No.3883856]

>>3883774
if something is good then it goes without saying, so there's no need to comment. if something is bad you should let the artists know so that way they have some direction on what they need to work on

[Anonymous No.3883858]

>>3883774
For social media, absolutely fine. Otherwise criticism is fine. I can't stand seeing ESL retards spouting shit about work whether it's right or wrong. As someone else said, social media is marketing and not implicitly asking for crit.

For the third one though, I think it's incredibly naive to think your work won't get reposted so don't release if you don't want it out there.

[Anonymous No.3883862]

>>3883858
>Otherwise
*Otherwise on a place like here or some shitty discord,

The best part about being around artistic people is getting valuable feedback to improve yourself. Shunning it is retarded and not a group of people I end up around anyway.

[Anonymous No.3883867]

I'm surprised by the comments here but the more I think about it the more I agree. Twitter or instagram isn't really made for artists looking for critique. It just felt weird to me at first because it's been drilled in my head since deviantartsnark livejournal days that ALL constructive criticism is good and by posting art online it's a free for all.

[Anonymous No.3883896]

>>3883787
This.
People really to grow thicker skin.

[Anonymous No.3883973]

>>3883775
Honestly, random "critiques" are usually shit.

Typically if you want a good critique you'd show all of your work so the person giving the critique can see the trends of what you're doing and give advice based on that. Advice on a single drawing is usually pointless and is based on whatever happened to be lacking in that particular image, which usually boils down to the artist not giving enough shit to care on this drawing. Sakimichan knows how to properly light things and draw hands, getting it wrong in 1 image doesn't need criticism and critiquing it is pointless.
If on the other hand someone regularly draws hands badly then its worth pointing out, but that's not something you'd just randomly post on a single image.

[Anonymous No.3883985]

>>3883774
Second red one is too snowflake. If you're putting something into the public eye, they have every right to make criticisms, whether it's "constructive" or not.

[Anonymous No.3883986]

>>3883774
sounds like the author is a little bitch

[Anonymous No.3883990]

this looks exactly like the kind of person who can't handle criticism

[Anonymous No.3884002]

>>3883986
If you're being a shithead in a social media feed you look like some edgy tryhard tagging on to someone more popular than you. Follower count to me doesn't mean anything but people aren't going to care what you say in that place so why even bother bringing the negativity there. You'll get reported or flagged as troll and bitch here when you never had to say it in the first place.

[Anonymous No.3884010]

>>3883774

Retarded, petty bullshit. You can't micromanage how people respond to your content. Only excessively polite people would agree with such a list anyway.

[Anonymous No.3884016]

>>3883774
I disagree with not taking unsolicited critique. This person is probably a plateaued patreon panderer so I could understand why they wouldn't care about putting in the work to improve and would rather just get a bunch of praise but free critique is free critique. Of course, as long as it's coming from someone demonstrably proficient and/or the criticism is sound.

[Anonymous No.3884027]

>>3883774
one is not being honest
one is being honest

you could choose the left one, but they're all lies
>i see you say lots of things, all of which no value

[Anonymous No.3884036]

How the fuck can someone be so mentally weak that the mere sight of someone sharing your art in a way that's not optimal makes you fall apart
>ptsd therapy class
>so why are you all here?
>I saw my brother get brutally tortured and then murdered for 30 hours straight
>and you?
>someone didn't like my post but they downloaded it anyway

[Anonymous No.3884099]

>>3884002
>>3883774
>>3883775
why even post your work in a social forum if you can't handle hearing what people actually think about it? if you just draw for fun then that's fine, you could either keep your work to yourself and simply draw for the sake of drawing or set up a gallery page with no interaction features. choosing to release your work into the wild but also telling people that they can't criticize you means all you really care about is getting your ego stroked when you haven't actually earned it. i have no respect for that.
not to mention
>https://twitter.com/copilotsheith/status/1105722877599346688
they seem to reserve the right to criticize anyone else, you just can't do it to them. don't hide your weaknesses under the veneer of forced positivity. you either want to hear what people think or you don't.

[Anonymous No.3884112]

I don't trust or befriend people who unironically block others on social media. It comes off as a major weakness of character.
Unless it's a bot that's rapidly and constantly spamming your feed, using the block feature shows just how much of a pussy someone is.

[Anonymous No.3884148]

>>3884112
>using the block feature shows just how much of a pussy someone is
> It comes off as a major weakness of character.
You're looking too deep into this, otherwise like 99% of the people on that site are pussies according to your standards. There are other ways to use the block button like for troll accounts or unnecessary harrassment from some nobody, it's an easy way to avoid annoying pests.

[Anonymous No.3884168]

>>3884099
If you want to get nitpicky, the original post is about fandom shit as a hobby. These aren't necessarily people looking to improve.

[Anonymous No.3884175]

>>3883774
This is how you have to treat your insecure artist friends who get bum pain at every slightest hint of criticism.

[Anonymous No.3884184]

>>3884148
Not him but 99% of people on that site ARE pussies bahahahaHAHA

[Anonymous No.3884191]

>>3883782
>>3883774
Yeah it's all about reading the atmosphere, OP. For example on some ART'S fb group or discord dedicated to improving your craft, sure you can give constructive criticism and it won't be out of place.
But if I'm on my own profile or page posting a pretty fanart I did and out of nowhere you start telling me that my background isn't as polished as the rest of the pic or that the clouds could have been a different color or something about the perspective, I'd just cringe because it's not the time for an art class.

Same reason we all have friends who do shitty art but we respectfully say we like it or try to notice something good to comment on. Once a piece is finished and they show it to you, you're just being an ass if your first comment is to correct something. You can, however, bring it up later if you two are talking about art, just put in some comments about what they're lacking without being too direct.

[Anonymous No.3884192]

>>3883774
>>3883775
https://eu03.wordpress.com/2014/01/25/some-advice/
> Don’t be overly defensive.
> If someone is trying to give you criticism, don’t be snooty and give excuses. Listen to it, and think about why they’re saying it.

[Anonymous No.3884197]

>>3883774
I'd usually say this is dumb but there's also knowing the current "skill cap" of someone. You just know that kid drawing Sonic OCs is unlikely to get (or desire to) get any better, so at that point it's just douchey to call their drawing flat and recommend them Loomis. Just comment on the SUBJECT, which is what a lot of people want. I mean, outside of /ic/ drawing isn't a dick measuring contest to see who has the most sick art skills. If I do an Evangelion drawing I want to share my love for the anime and for you to comment what you think of it, not to tell me one of Asuka's boobs is bigger than the other one.

[Anonymous No.3884207]

>>3883808
>I don't like [x show] but I still like this fanart
fuck you bitch (not you anon, but the maker of OP pic) I dont want ppl to start asking me about a show I dont even like just because I liked a fanart of it and I couldnt mnention I didnt like the show because it hurt your feelings. The other points are just as bad, except for the schedule one, which is half half.

[Anonymous No.3884209]

>>3884148
As a general rule of thumb, I assume most normie artists (and social media users in general) can't handle anything remotely 'rude' sounding without blocking that 'target' and fortifying their safe space. Hugbox culture is in full swing right now, so while there certainly are exceptions, I tend to keep a realistic outlook regarding who I'll encounter on 'mainstream' sites outside of the chans.

[Anonymous No.3884210]

Fucking fragile snowflakes.

[Anonymous No.3884222]

>>3883973
>Sakimichan knows how to properly light things

[Anonymous No.3884227]

>>3884099
>they seem to reserve the right to criticize anyone else
>This is vastly different to coming across something that is universally offensive (ie sexist, racist, homophobic) that SHOULD be called out.
Oh yeah! Unless you are a woman, then you can get caught drawing underage bondage incest and people will support you and say they love you like you are being victimized
Fuck off

[Anonymous No.3884229]

>>3883774
I fucking hate these people.

[Anonymous No.3884236]

>>3884197
>Your robot is so cool! I made fanart!
>See the art
>The part where curved planes intersect is all wrong
>This person has never read Scott Robertson
>Put a like on it

[Anonymous No.3884238]

>>3884209
I think it's still a nicer move to send something like a PM to the person instead of criticizing the art publicly, as I said social media is a self advertising platform and people don't want a comment pointing out mistakes right under the art they posted (although yeah, there shouldn't be obvious mistakes in the first place). If you are offended by some dude privately telling you "hey you drew 6 fingers on the left hand" then it's completely unreasonable.

[Anonymous No.3884282]

>>3883775
I see no issue here....

Don't give critiques to people unless they ask for it. Plain and simple.
Some autists have trouble understanding this, though.

[Anonymous No.3884283]

>>3883781
If they ask for it, yeah.
Not everyone wants their work analyzed and broken down by some rando who probably doesn't even draw.

[Anonymous No.3884292]

>>3883774
I had people say things like i dont like x animal but this is cute. I think thats nice. The rest I agree with.

Keep in mind that people making a mistake doesn't mean they are unaware of it or that they don't study. They probably have their go to people or places to seek criticism.

[Anonymous No.3884311]

>>3883774
I somewhat agree with the second one. If i post my art here i always want people to shit on me and tell me what's wrong with it but if i post it on twitter i don't want some random cunt exposing my mistakes to my retarded followers who cant distinguish good from bad.

[Anonymous No.3884322]

>>3883774
thanks internet censorship police. this is the same logic that led to facebook having a like button but not a dislike. you need fucking both! they treat us like babies. "if you have nothing nice to say, dont say anything at all." fuck you! if i dont like something ill say it.

[Anonymous No.3884327]

>>3884282
If they can't handle well meaning critique, I would love to see how they handle getting heckled by deliberate trolls.

[Anonymous No.3884328]

>>3884322
People use the frowny face for that one.

[Anonymous No.3884335]

>>3884327
Doesn't matter if its well meaning, if they don't ask for it specifically then don't go around giving your 2cents. Every artist isn't open for criticism of their work and you should respect that.

Why is this so hard for you autistic idiots to comprehend lol

You're like those retards in those discord servers that analyzes 5 minute doodles seriously and they can barely draw themselves.

[Anonymous No.3884341]

>>3883774
>DO: Reblog, retweet, recommend
>Don't: Repost, quote retweet, copy and paste to other sites if you credit the creator
There is literally no difference between these besides the number of buttons you have to press

[Anonymous No.3884778]

>>3883774
>>3883775
It's twitter. What the fuck did you expected?

[Anonymous No.3884836]

>>3884099
>they seem to reserve the right to criticize anyone else, you just can't do it to them. don't hide your weaknesses under the veneer of forced positivity.

And that's why I don't trust people that are overly nice, specially on something like Twitter, they always have some fishy thing going on that eventually gets discovered

[Anonymous No.3885034]

>>3884227
Amusingly, when they announced the twitter loli/shota ban a handful of female artists bitched that it was harmful to women because it limited their means of self-expression, to the point some of them argued that the ban should apply to cis men only because "only men abuse children" apparently. Then they locked their accounts after they got shat on.
It was funny as fuck. Fucking pedos.

[Anonymous No.3885041]

>>3883775
I saw your righteous complaint and I clapped!

[Anonymous No.3885121]

I try to avoid giving critics, unless the probles is so painfully glaring that I feel the need to smear it on the fucker's face.

[Anonymous No.3885130]

>>3884335
> Missing the point this much
It doesn't matter if they don't want it, people are going to have opinions and if you can't handle that; you're in for a horrible time when someone is trying to piss you off.

Why is that hard for an autistic idiot like you to comprehend lol

If you don't like what you hear, grow some skin and ignore it; not whine like a little bitch.

[Anonymous No.3885173]

>>3885130
Your "point" is moot because you're basically arguing about forcing criticism on someone's work and being an autistic asshat.

There is a difference between an "opinion" and criticism. You can make all the opinions you want, but keep your critiques to yourself unless the artist asks for it.

>grow some skin and ignore it
How about you follow your own advice and keep your dumb "opinions" to yourself?

Not sure how I can explain this concept any better for you, autistic child.

[Anonymous No.3885211]

>>3884222
She can. But replace her with any pro artist. If you post a single image from any professional artist, you could nitpick 1000 things. But these things typically things they can do right, they just weren't paying attention or let it slide this time, or just didn't have the time or energy to care about every little thing.
Critiquing them by pointing out nitpicked flaws isn't helpful to them because they could already do those things.

Not every image is perfect and nobody has the time to make every image perfect, critiques should always be about trends, not individual pieces of art. Unless it's a wip in which case that's a bit different but it's usually focused on general ideas and composition as opposed to nitpicks again.

[Anonymous No.3885223]

>>3883774
only insecure snowflakes cant take criticism

[Anonymous No.3885228]

>painting something for 10 days straight
>proud of my hard work and think its pretty damn good
>post it on twitter
>everyone loves it
>suddenly some autist starts going off about how one of the leafs aren't shaded
>just say lol forgot, must have overlooked it, but I don't really care
>he starts freaking out about me not taking criticism
>starts posting my images from 30 years ago on /ic/ cringe threads as if it means anything
>still don't give a shit.

[Anonymous No.3885267]

This makes it seem like you need coddle artists and walk on fucking eggshells around their work because they'll off themselves at the slightest hint of dislike. Jesus.

[Anonymous No.3885302]

>>3885173
> basically arguing about forcing criticism on someone's work and being an autistic asshat
Don't put words in my mouth, faggot.

> There is a difference between an "opinion" and criticism.
Since when did opinions mean "as long as the creator approves of it"? To people like OP, saying "It's a little hard to read" is viewed as an attack.

> but keep your critiques to yourself unless the artist asks for it
I already do that, not because "it's the right thing to do" but because it's a waste of time if they're lost cause.

> How about you follow your own advice and keep your dumb "opinions" to yourself?
Your butthurt defensiveness is just proving my point lmao

> Not sure how I can explain this concept any better for you, autistic child.
Post your work.

[Anonymous No.3885324]

>>3885302
>call others butthurt
>types all of this out
The irony is palpable

[Anonymous No.3885328]

>>3885223
How should one "take" criticism

[Anonymous No.3885335]

>>3883985
Back when we still had loomisloves.us, one of the suggestions for giving critique is not to be too caustic because we've all been in the receiving end at one point. So I think what matters is how you present your wording since there's a difference between critiquing and just plain insulting the artist.

>>3884191
> Same reason we all have friends who do shitty art but we respectfully say we like it or try to notice something good to comment on.
I got mixed feelings about this because I know we all tell white lies to avoid hurting people we like but at the same time I feel like this is enabling them. I read some convention story about how this one artist went through a breakdown after not getting the sales she was expecting.

[Anonymous No.3885338]

>>3885324
>"no u"
>continues to reply
>not longer than previous posts
The irony is palpable

[Anonymous No.3885345]

>>3885328
If it's reasonable criticism, you take it by not being a faggot about it, especially this one >>3883775. Is it even worth the effort to get mad at someone who didn't praise you?

[Anonymous No.3885428]

>>3885335
>I got mixed feelings about this because I know we all tell white lies to avoid hurting people we like but at the same time I feel like this is enabling them. I read some convention story about how this one artist went through a breakdown after not getting the sales she was expecting.
I think there's a clear balance between being nice and letting them be stupid. I would never shittalk, bash, or just randomly critique a friend if they're clearly a beginner. I'd be encouraging them to draw more, because drawing more and enjoying the craft is the first step toward gitting gud. The skill and Loomis comes after you make the decision yourself to git gud, other people can't make that decision for you.
However, if said friend was talking about commissions or applying to art school, I'd challenge them to a draw off and show them their place in the world. I wouldn't let them be stupid and I'd let them know that while they're better than people who dont try, they're by no means a professional tier artist.

If they want help afterwards I'd help, but they need to want to improve.

[Anonymous No.3885477]

>>3883774
First one correct
Second one is retarded
Third is not as needed either way, but left is optional
Forth is both retarded. If you're going to /ic/, you do right. Never do left unless you're 10-14 years old.

[Anonymous No.3885525]

>>3883781
it really depends on the situation, you look like an ass if you went to a rave and after the show walked up to the DJ and started spouting off shit about how they should try to be like Madeon or some shit.

[Anonymous No.3885536]

>>3883787
cause people saying shit at inappropriate times is still shitty, without the proper context its like bothering dancers or musicians afters performances to critique them when they aren't expecting it. It wasn't a competition you weren't a judge and they don't know you. If it wasn't requested or you don't have clout or a relationship with them it comes off as being a jackass.

[Anonymous No.3885540]

>>3884327
you have just compared it to trolls.. your point is basically self made invalid.

[Anonymous No.3885544]

>>3885130
you are missing the point so hard cause its not about the obvious trolls its about people not inadvertently being trollish. Its like manners, you could be the ass hole who tracks in mud into other peoples homes, it isn't necessarily the worst thing to do but you at least now know to take of your shoes when entering, but we all know a literal shit person will not care and also wreck your home but its not about them. Its about people with a semblance of decency. Juts because some people act like assholes doesn't mean you always can or should.

[Anonymous No.3885546]

>>3885477
second one is dont be that asshole who has to start shit, my god literally all of you lack decency.

[Anonymous No.3885550]

>>3885546
Artists make others get fucking gud, no time for sweettalk unless you want the artist to fail. They won't grow if their /beg/ tier art gets praised by brainlets, we need masterful artists to build the world's image of great content and architecture.

[Anonymous No.3885575]

>>3885544
That wasn't my point at all, my point is not to act all pissy over comments short of praise. I'm saying these things because I know some people who fold like paper and throw shitfits over the dumbest things.
Fuck, even I was guilty of it when I got an innocuous critique on how to do things and then getting mad at the implication that I wasn't perfect but in hindsight, everything that person said was right.
You're also assuming I think everyone is fair game for unsolicited critique; I'm actually not. If it's about manners, then it goes both ways.

>>3885550
What about the hobbyists that's just doing it for shits and giggles? I don't see the point in going after children who are probably not going to understand what you're talking about.

[Anonymous No.3885579]

Pathetic, but whatever, that's their problem. Kids being kids.

[Anonymous No.3885621]

>>3885575
>What about the hobbyists that's just doing it for shits and giggles?
Then you really shouldn't be posting it on social media. So many normalfags lap up anything FoTM so newfags at drawing can get trapped with shitty art for dickbrain pandering like Diives or some shit. Stick to DA or something if you want your art as a hoppy, if you want it to grow you shill it on Twitter and get gud coming here until people start shitposting your work, then you know you've made it proper.

[Anonymous No.3885623]

>>3885621
>Then you really shouldn't be posting it on social media.
This is the most retarded thing I've read tonight. Whoop whoop - the ART™ CONTENT POLICE ARE HERE.

[Anonymous No.3885625]

>>3885623
Stay mad /beg/ that relies on fotms for attention.

[Anonymous No.3885630]

>>3885338
>no u
You have quite literally been copying everything I post, but rearrange a few words around you autisitc moron.
>the irony is palpable
Do you even know what irony is?
Of course you don't, otherwise you wouldn't be embarrassing yourself like this.

But continue embarrassing yourself like this, its quite entertaining. You've lost this little back and forth a long time ago.

[Anonymous No.3885635]

>>3885544
This guy isn't me>>3885575
And im not sure exactly why they decided to pretend to be and post in my stead, but we get it.
You guys are autistic and want to "criticize" people and impose your ideas on their work whether they asked for it not.

It doesn't ultimately matter I suppose since they will just ignore/ block you anyways.

[Anonymous No.3885641]

>>3883774

Sounds like a hugbox community. Actually have a damn snipe. I would want constructive criticism all the time, instead of blindly being told that everything i make is good.

What kind of fucking shit is this? Those people will never improve. Also did they forget this is the internet and anyone can say whatever? Why care about trolls and shitposters?

[Anonymous No.3885764]

>>3885034
If i ever fuck up, I'll just say I identify as a woman. Even that girl who accused Epic Games of stealing her character when it was all fake got an army of white knights. Like that shit is straight up criminal but it's a girl so she's untouchable. I bet my ass if this was a boy they would have lynched him.
I don't usually say this shit but fuck's sake, that artist drawing underage incest fucking joked about it too and answered all passive aggressive and a good 75% of people defended her like she was a beautiful person. Imagine a dude getting caught drawing underage gay incest.

[Anonymous No.3886016]

>>3883774
>Keyboard smash,emoji spam
Please don't.

[Anonymous No.3886116]

>>3883775
Tons of replies. Expecting everyone to ridicule the guy.
>Everyone agrees
Can't belive these are the people I share a board with.
If someone says your trash art is trash. They're entitled to their opinion. Even if you don't agree with it. Just go "Yup man, that's your opinion" and go by your day. No need to take it as a personal attack. Jezus you guys are crybabies.

[Anonymous No.3886136]

>>3886116
To tell the truth, I've had a few people talk shit on my art on DeviantArt years ago and when I visited their profile they were always fat autistic kids who posted cringey photographs of themselves holding horribly drawn sonic OCs
I would agree that you have to be a bit autistic to put unsolicited criticism on people's art on social media, it's an advertising platform.
Of course you're allowed to do whatever

[Anonymous No.3886454]

>>3885764

I remember back in college the local nerd group made a programming experiment using C to create a "digital judge" that judges exclusively based on crimes and severity, rather than race or gender. It was simplified as fuck, but at least it wasn't "discriminatory." They used American demographics to create the virtual groups.
You can guess people flipped shit when the virtual women were given the same harsh sentences as the men, with female "death inmates" reaching 4/6 as the males.

Ironically, the experiment was used as an argument on campus on why "equality judges" were a bad idea after all.

[Anonymous No.3886470]

>>3883774
>>3883775
Whitest ppl problems

[Anonymous No.3886830]

>>3883774
i like some of it but the don't sound dumb like the artist it's triggered by gosh..."constructive criticism?"

DA HORRA!

[Anonymous No.3889205]

>>3883774
I don't know which is worse, these crybabies or the angry crabs here.

I've seen so many faggots spazz out on other people's art here, but you just call them a faggot and move on. But I had a dude praise my stuff on DA beyond anything reasonable, and it's been about two weeks and I still have no idea what to reply.

[Anonymous No.3889245]

>>3885536
People should be allowed to boo, and throw tomatoes.

[Anonymous No.3889253]

>>3885536
Stop being a faggot solves that problem 100% of the time

[Anonymous No.3889254]

>>3889205
> thanks, u cool
Idk, maybe?

[Anonymous No.3890204]

>>3889254
I did that the first time and the guy doubled down beyond reason. Checked his DA and he has some Sonic and Robotnik fanart. I think I'll just pretend nothing happened.

[Anonymous No.3890235]

>>3883774
Eh, unsolicited criticism can be pretty annoying, because it's rarely helpful. It's usually just some dunning-kruger trying to look smart while providing "her elbows are too pointy" tier critique.

[Anonymous No.3890239]

>>3890235
I used to draw in /a/ threads, but some namefag called shieldman or whatever kept critiquing my shit so I just stopped delivering

[Anonymous No.3890243]

>>3883774
>The first one/pair
Yeah, completely agree.
>The rest...
Kind just feel like the artist needs to deal with that when posting to the internet. Like I understand it can be annoying, but it honestly is how some people show appreciation.

[Anonymous No.3890248]

>>3889205
just thank them

[Anonymous No.3890254]

Rule 2 and 4 are pretty retarded

[Anonymous No.3890346]

>>3883854
Post characters

[Anonymous No.3891101]

ALL of this is shit advice for sheltered, complacent weaklings. I literally need everything in the red side from my followers.
>sorta undisciplined and use work as an excuse for not working on art even on the weekends
If I had people breathing down my neck it’d help by: (a) giving me the feeling people are wanting to see my art (b) putting my feet to the fires
>unwarranted critique
PLEASE DO THIS! My comic pages were unreadable because I was trying to do this artsy shit with speech bubbles and disregarded the top to bottom right to left standard. To me the speech order was clear but that people were KIND enough to tell me helped me know there was an issue to fix. If they didn’t CARE enough to tell me then my pages would still looked effed
>quote retweet and reposting even with credits
Nibba this is the weakest sauce and I never really got bothered by this. Especially if they credit you. You will never eliminate reposting online. Most boards on this very site are about image sharing without credits. I know this is a tired argument but if you post something online you need to be prepared for it to be saved and shared everywhere because that potential exist the second you post it. The only thing you can do is pray that it somehow comes back to you somehow.
>your art makes me like a thing I normally wouldn’t
How is this even remotely bad?

[Anonymous No.3891102]

>>3890239
you mean shieldbro? the few times I saw him, he only said nice things.

[Anonymous No.3891120]

>>3884197
You’re making a good point but here’s a better one. Boobs are like faces. If they look like shit then the whole drawing will too. People only draw titties to have them looked at. If one is bigger than the other then it’s gonna be noticed because they’re supposed to match almost exactly. Some girls boobs are slightly different or sag a little unevenly but that’s an exception not the rule. I know you were just using that as an example but everyone else, pay special attention to making the spots that you know people are gonna look at look right. Faces and titties 100% need special care

[Anonymous No.3891132]

>>3883774
The first two points are fine, the second 2 are absolute jokes and were obviously written by a drone of some sorts. Tell your honest feelings. Don't spam base complements and feign your hype like some 16 year old girl who spends all of her day on social media.

I agree with everything on the right being a don't. Although if someone posts a picture with the caption "What are your thoughts?" then you should obviously expect criticism.

[Anonymous No.3891135]

>>3885034
dafuq? here i was hoping there was hope in humanity

[Anonymous No.3891148]

>>3891120
>Some girls boobs are slightly different or sag a little unevenly but that’s an exception not the rule.
other way around

[Anonymous No.3891330]

I dont know how i feel about criticism from randos on social media who can barely draw themselves. Sometimes the point they make is valid but a lot of the time theyre just spitting bullshit. on here its fine obviously because this board is for critique but on the place where you want to display a nice gallery of work its frustrating to have a negative stain in the comments permanently hanging under it, id delete them but id feel like an asshole for doing that

[Anonymous No.3891757]

>>3883774
this is why sjw culture will always be pathetic.