/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.3842556]

is there any tip on how to foreshortening? can some kind anons share the secrets? im having a hard time doing it, im just using a box and drawing inside trying to keep the proportions and shit, or should i use vanishing points?

[Anonymous No.3842607]

did it have to be a loli you fucking faggot

[Anonymous No.3842609]

>>3842556
the word key is overlapping

volumes overlap each other so you dont get to see everything but stretched like you did. experiment and study with overlapping volumes, foreshortening its imagination / memory drawing territory because you have to remember what volumes are bigger than others so you know what to hide and what show, and how much too

now post the damn ref

[Anonymous No.3842610]

>>3842607

[Anonymous No.3842615]

>>3842556
Cute loli anon

[Anonymous No.3842616]

>>3842607
Don't think you really know what a loli is.

[Anonymous No.3842618]

>>3842556
looks pretty good anon but lolis have narrower hips

[Anonymous No.3842623]

>>3842618
i love my some thick hipped lolis

[Anonymous No.3842629]

>>3842618
No they don't

[Anonymous No.3842633]

>>3842616
Isn’t it a pedo drawing that sex pests claim is 18+?

[Anonymous No.3842635]

>>3842556
>that thigh gap

[Anonymous No.3842639]

>>3842633
its usually a pedo drawing that crybabies like you never shut the fuck up about

[Anonymous No.3842644]

>>3842633
>lines on a paper
>can represent literally anything the artist claims it represents
>"hurr durrrr it's a fucking CHILD because I said it is!!!!"
I am convinced that people like you have actual photos of cp on your computer and just lash out like this as a form of cope.

[Anonymous No.3842648]

>>3842644

But if it's not supposed to look like a pubescent or pre pubescent child, why draw it like one?

[Anonymous No.3842650]

>>3842648
why draw anything, who cares mate its a drawing

[Anonymous No.3842651]

>>3842648
I don't want to hear your pedo excuses.

[Anonymous No.3842657]

>>3842633
No, she's a young little girl ripe for dicking and there is nothing wrong with that because it's just a drawing

[Anonymous No.3842658]

>>3842644
If it looks like it, and it isn't, it's a shit drawing,
or
it is what it looks like.

[Anonymous No.3842659]

>>3842657
this

[Anonymous No.3842660]

>>3842658
pretty brainlet take, but thanks for sharing it anyways

[Anonymous No.3842662]

Holy shit they are just lines on a digital canvas lmao get a life you fucking keyboard warriors

[Anonymous No.3842671]

>>3842662
no, fuck you and your pedo garbage! We gotta protect the imaginary children from the imaginary rape! Wont someone please think of the imaginary children!

[Anonymous No.3842676]

>>3842633
Accusing everyone of being a pedo doesn't make you not a pedo. I imagine you spazzing out like this every time about thos because you're so confused about your feelings and you're afraid of accepting your attraction to children.

That's natural. I'm not attracted to children. The image does nothing for me, and similarly I don't acknowledge it. Because it's a fucking drawing.

[Anonymous No.3842677]

That's it, I'm calling the lolipolice, I hope you reflect upon your heinous acts.

[Anonymous No.3842680]

>>3842650

Why deny your intentions? People draw things they find interesting. There is nothing arbitrary about drawing loli.

[Anonymous No.3842683]

>>3842680
didnt deny anything, it doesnt matter

what do you want, people to admit they find unrealistic depictions of kids attractive? big deal lol its not going to stop children from getting raped or people from finding kids attractive, grow up and dont look at things you dont like

[Anonymous No.3842684]

>>3842676

It's just a drawing, but let's not pretend that it's not supposed to be a young naked girl.

[Anonymous No.3842691]

>>3842683

>lines on a paper
>can represent literally anything the artist claims it represents
>"hurr durrrr it's a fucking CHILD because I said it is!!!!"

This is what I am replying to. They are clearly depictions of children. Fine, I don't care. Draw whatever you want. Just don't be dishonest about it and write nonsense like this.

[Anonymous No.3842692]

>>3842684
It is.

[Anonymous No.3842694]

>>3842691
because people talk about it like its child abuse and needs to be outlawed 90% of the time.

if you just want us to say its childlike ill be the first to do it unrepentantly, but theres nothing to gain from it argumentally. its like people just want to feel better about themselves because "eww icky"

id argue lolicon is usually unrealistic enough to be flat + late teens bodytype but i dont even waste my time with that now because it moves the goalpost.

[Anonymous No.3842700]

>>3842694

>if you just want us to say its childlike ill be the first to do it unrepentantly

Pretty much. I'm a free speech absolutist when it comes to art and I can assure you I'm 0% butthurt about loli existing. A drawing of a pipe is not a pipe. Yet, I find silly when people go with the "le 2000 year old vampire" or "lol just a petite woman" defence.

[Anonymous No.3842707]

>>3842660
Just trying to match everyone else here

[Anonymous No.3842729]

>>3842633
I knew a girl who was 21 and had that exact body type, fuck you.

[Anonymous No.3842734]

>>3842556
You should be using vanishing points if you are drawing a box. Then to get the initial outline of your character find the centre of the forward facing plane and mark 7 heads from top to bottom or how many heads you are using to get the height. From there it's pretty self explanatory anon. Maybe you should have posted a faggot instead so the thread wouldn't have turned to shit.

[Anonymous No.3842736]

>>3842556
It sounds cheesy but the spiral method kinda helps.

[Anonymous No.3842737]

So this is /ic/'s terrifying true form, huh

[Anonymous No.3842741]

>>3842737
thanks for the chuckle

[Anonymous No.3842747]

>>3842556
Although observing from life is your best option, try taking a look at how other artists foreshorten and try to see exactly what's going on. Use contour lines and cross-sections to understand how overlapping forms are represented.

[Anonymous No.3842748]

>>3842729
wtf! it's not fair!

[Anonymous No.3842749]

>>3842747

[Anonymous No.3842750]

>>3842749

[Anonymous No.3842755]

>>3842737
kek
No, it must be less civil than this mild discussion about cunny or whatever.
>>3842747
.

[Anonymous No.3842772]

>>3842747
yeah that's what i was doing i was using a box then drawing circles on the top and botton and using the middle point as a guide but the more crazy the angle the harder it gets i guess it could be easier on digital with layers and shit.

what do you mean by observing from life? i have no problems visualizing a 3d image of what i want to draw it's just that getting it right is too complicated, especially when it comes to draw lines to show overlaping since depending on the angle they could be more or less accented

>>3842749
im feel like she has a wormlike torso shouldn't her head be more smaller since she's further away from the camera/viewer even with the if it's a loli head

[Anonymous No.3842913]

Use the coil method, and stop drawing loli shit, in that order.

[Anonymous No.3842916]

>>3842556
just trace over a 3d model. it was not that hard

[Anonymous No.3842924]

>>3842607
It actually does have to be a "loli" or whatever buzzword Facebook term you use to describe any girl with flat chest. A big pair of boobs would cover the whole body from that perspective, impeding on the way of demonstrating effective foreshortening.

[Anonymous No.3842925]

>>3842671
>please think of the imaginary children!
uh-oh

[Anonymous No.3842928]

>>3842556
draw from ref
turn them into cylinder and shit like that
draw cross contour lines
draw zillion from ref
you will develop good understand which help you estimate thing better

[Anonymous No.3842934]

>>3842924
this

[Anonymous No.3842939]

>>3842772
>what do you mean by observing from life
I mean looking at real-life people, whether it's a figure drawing session with a live model or looking at yourself in the mirror - it really helps to have something tangible that you can move around and observe in real time. Try extending your arm towards a mirror then draw it at different angles to the mirror (90 degrees, 60, 45 etc) to observe different levels of foreshortening and overlapping. Another good method for studying foreshortening is using 3D models, although make sure they're 100% anatomically correct. This makes it easier to look at how different camera angles affect foreshortening as well.

[Anonymous No.3843036]

[Anonymous No.3843037]

>>3843036

[Anonymous No.3843039]

>>3843037

[Anonymous No.3843040]

>>3842556
no secrets, just search real ref and copy the lines till you get it by nature. Some construction knowledge will help you somewhat but draw what you see till you can replicate it, that works good enought for me.

[Anonymous No.3843041]

>>3843039

[Anonymous No.3843049]

>>3842644
>>lines on a paper
You mean pixels, like an uploaded picture of child fucking can be as well. You guys are losing this argument more and more, and I really don't give a shit either way because I don't even draw this kind of stuff.

Why can't you guys stop defending yourselves and just stick to your content in silence. Why bring attention to yourselves? Just enjoy your pleasures in bliss.

[Anonymous No.3843053]

>>3843049
>lines drawn on a tablet is the same as pictures of a real child enduring rape
do you even have a functional brain? you embarrassment to human intelligence.

>>3843049
>stick to your content in silence
we are, you dipshits complain literally about it any time it gets brought up or even viewed like a bunch of hormonal teenagers, why dont YOU stick to your content in silence so we dont have to reply to your vapid drivel 24/7

[Anonymous No.3843056]

>>3843053
And again, you sound triggered. You lose your argument again.
People literally won't stop until you stop feeding them. Look at the Michael Jackson shit again, same issues, and it doesn't stop because they can't just ignore the instigators. I'm literally trying to help you lot but you are your own enemy, and cry when you don't get your way like manchildren, or incels as they call it now.

It's just like with the gays, because both cases aren't considered "normal" to society but at one point, gays used to just stay quiet and kept their thing to themselves.

[Anonymous No.3843058]

>>3843056
ecksdee u r triggered u lose libtard

thats not how this works, you offer nothing to this debate and are better off in silence. unfortunately you feel the need to put in your useless 2c even after letting everyone know youre a pathetic fencesitter. do you only seek attention?

gays were persecuted the moment they were caught, silent or not. that was unacceptable then, now, and is just as unacceptable revolving peoples freedom of expression. what a shitty analogy.

[Anonymous No.3843059]

>>3843058
>ecksdee u r triggered u lose libtard
Anon, are you ok?

[Anonymous No.3843062]

>>3843059
if your only argument is that expressing a counter argument passionately is a loss you are a waste of energy interacting with

[Anonymous No.3843065]

>>3843062
>passionately
Bro you're on 4chan, no one cares. Stop posting and you'd wouldn't have to feel the need to do so.

[Anonymous No.3843066]

>>3843065
if you say some stupid shit ill call you stupid, because it is 4chan

[Anonymous No.3843068]

>>3843066
I legit don't care. I'm just calling you people out for getting triggered and acting out because people call you out for liking things they don't like. Be better than them by not responding.

[Anonymous No.3843070]

>>3843068
Even if you end up derailing the thread, you vapid piece of shit?

[Anonymous No.3843071]

>>3843068
off 4chan that means we silently get harassed and deplatformed while those people make a shitload of noise. grease to squeaky wheels. you seem incredibly naive considering everything that has happened in recent months

that is obviously not better than mounting an actual argument.

[Anonymous No.3843074]

>>3842633
Last time I checked pedos weren't attracted to large hip/waste ratios.

[Anonymous No.3843079]

>>3843068
>calling people out
No, everyone was calling YOU out cause you don't wanna acknowledge that these are drawings of underage girls. You are adamant that they are not, and make the shitty argument of
>they just pixels on a screen
just like PHOTONS go into our EYES does that make it less real? The drawings are a depiction of underage girls, that is not an opinion, it is what is being depicted cause we all SEE it with our EYES. Stop crying like a baby and acknowledge it, literally no one cares if it's a loli, you think i stop and comment on every loli in a post? No, it's just hilarious because you are such a DUMBASS. If you're gonna be a rockbottom loli loving ass hat you should've thrown away your common sense by now. You aren't gonna convince anyone of anything.

[Anonymous No.3843092]

>>3843070
I mean it's just a thread about foreshortening, and OP seem to have gotten what he wanted by now since he stopped talking I guess.

>>3843071
>you seem incredibly naive considering everything that has happened in recent months
I guess I am, what happened?

>>3843079
>No, everyone was calling YOU out cause you don't wanna acknowledge that these are drawings of underage girls.
Umm, anon? My first post itt was >>3843049 and I was actually stating the OPPOSITE. I'm not saying these images aren't a grey area of subject matter, I'm asking why are people that end up liking this stuff so defensive. It reminds me of those people that end up depressed and rabid acting when denied of their coping mechanism.

[Anonymous No.3843094]

>>3843092
Woops wrong person soz, i meant >>3843053
or >>3842644
or whoever they are

[Anonymous No.3843097]

uhh- guys wasnt OP asking about foreshortening and not loli debates

[Anonymous No.3843099]

>>3843097
pshhhh that boat has sailed my friend

[Anonymous No.3843110]

>>3843079
im only half of your point but what does getting us to acknowledge were drawing kids accomplish

do you even know why child porn is illegal and immoral

[Anonymous No.3843117]

>>3842556
The head, torso, hips, and legs should overlap a bit more, to give a sense of depth. Being able to trace from the knees to the neck through all that white space might be a problem - a well placed, thin contour to separate these forms will make them look as though they occupy closer and farther positions in space. The legs (especially at the girl's right knee) does a better job at this whole "overlapping forms" business, but the body as a whole doesn't.

Also, the hips and shoulders are about the same width here, which is a problem. Shoulders tend to be about the same width (a bit wider) than the hips when seen from a neutral, frontal view. The image here has almost parallel lines between the shoulders to the hips on each side. Meanwhile, the legs show that such parallel lines should really be converging on a vanishing point. This incongruency breaks the foreshortening. To illustrate this point, cover up the hips and below with a finger, and you find that everything above the hips doesn't adhere much to foreshortening rules as much as the legs do.

>>3842616
everyone saying that isn't a loli look at the filename

[Anonymous No.3843119]

>this FUCKING autism

why is so important to have the last word against someone in a Chinese sweater knitting imageboard

[Anonymous No.3843122]

i am sorry for derailing the thread
i will go jack off to some exquisite grade schooler pussy

[Anonymous No.3843128]

>>3843117
The reason why the hiplines are parallel to the shoulder isn't because OP failed to demonstrate proper vanishing point where it should converge just as the legs do, as you have pointed out. It's simply because of the outrageously wide hips the girl has that it negates the perspective to the point looking parallel to her shoulder. If this character were to be seen from a neutral frontal view, her hips would be much wider than her shoulders. I recognize the artstyle and can tell which artist OP took this refpic from, and I can tell you that said artist does love to make crazy wide hips on girls with small body frame.

[Anonymous No.3843136]

>>3843128
Ah. In that case, maybe close off the thigh gap and rely much more on overlapping forms? If we go by that logic of outrageously wide hips, than by imagining the foreshortened proportions in a neutral view, that thigh gap might be wider than her neck. I'd still argue to add a bit more foreshortening to the upper body though.

[Anonymous No.3843143]

>>3843136
Agreed. Her torso features could use some more overlapping considering the steepness of the angle that her legs indicate (Unless she's slouching her ribcage backwards, which is a really weird pose). I also didn't notice the bits about her thighs gap until you pointed it out, good one. It seems like the artist painted himself into a corner trying to emphasize the roundness of the girl's thighs that he forgot to leave some space for the feet to converge further. That being said, anime necks are often times super thin to begin with and going by how sexualized the original artist's arts usually are, it might as well be intentional that she has a very wide thigh gap. It's hard to draw the line between stylizations and anatomy mistakes at times like these.

[Anonymous No.3843162]

>>3843049
>You mean pixels, like an uploaded picture of child fucking can be as well
Oh right, I forgot, when you draw a loli getting fucked on a paper, and then scan it in, you've just committed real life child sexual assault.

You fucking mouth breather, you retard.

[Anonymous No.3843204]

>>3843128
>outrageously wide hips the girl has
It looks normal though

[Anonymous No.3843223]

>>3843204
Any artist who sufficiently understands reality will be indistinguishable from magic. Pic related

[Anonymous No.3843243]

>>3843162
>you've just committed real life child sexual assault.
Projection. That's not what's illegal, it's part of it. Attraction to kids is illegal, rape is twice illegal. It's like second degree burn and third degree burn, they are both burns.

[Anonymous No.3843257]

>>3842556
When draw something that is extremely foreshortened irl, I automatically twist it in a way so that the resulting picture is from a whole other angle. What do???

[Anonymous No.3843270]

>>3843243
>liking what I don't like its illegal
most passive aggressive thing I heard in a while

[Anonymous No.3843271]

>>3843243
This is a troll

[Anonymous No.3843272]

>>3843243
>Attraction to kids is illegal
I'm not even a lolifag, but it's not.
Porn drawings have no bearing on reality. Get over yourself.

[Anonymous No.3843273]

>>3843243
>Attraction to kids is illegal
lmao its not.
In no country of the world.
Consider how thinking about nuking the world or thinking about killing your boss is also legal.

[Anonymous No.3843290]

>>3843243
>illegal art
>illegal thoughts

[Anonymous No.3843298]

>>3843243
>Having certain thoughts is illegal
Jesus Christ, lad, just think for a second about what you just said, and the implications of it. What do you think would happen if we would go about organizing society among guidelines like these?

[Anonymous No.3843369]

So, the trick is to know what volumes overlap, but also how to project proportions in foreshortening. On this thing I drew, you can see in fig.a a typical figure, with proportions marked. Then With the red circles I marked the parts that I think are seen from our point of view.
In fig.b you can see how to project these into perspective. In fig.b 1) you see how to find a center of a rectangle in perspective. You do that by drawing lines from its corners to opposite corners, the center is their intersection point.
Inf fib.b 2) You extend the sides towards the vanishing point, then find a center on the perpendicular edge, these are marked with orange dots. Then draw a line from the opposite corner through the orange dot and where it meets the extended side this will be your new bottom edge for the next rectangle. These 2 rectangles are same in size in perspective although the one closer to you looks bigger. Fig.b 3) shows how you can build these rectangles in different directions.
Fig.c is just a character I built using a mesh from fig.b.
Fig.D shows a case when some part is not seen at all from your point of view, therefore you need to account for that.

[Anonymous No.3843487]

>>3843298
Create the another United Kingdom.

[Anonymous No.3843490]

>>3843487
That cannot be allowed to happen.

[Anonymous No.3843499]

>>3843369
Recognise your style keep it up

[Anonymous No.3843507]

>>3843298
everybody should be put in jail, so we should those damn robots already to take our jobs and put us in jail. how dare us still roam the earth free with all this depravity

[Anonymous No.3843638]

>>3843369
now thats pretty gud

[Anonymous No.3843653]

>>3843487
So it's Americans that are in this thread like this?
No wonder people hate them so much. You act like your government isn't corrupt in the same vain of that anon's argument, but it doesn't effect you directly so you sheepishly spout a lot of crock to save face. You people act so naive it's hysterical.

[Anonymous No.3843712]

>>3843653
Nah, plenty of people all around the world who are fucking idiots. How do you think the UK ended up where it is? Essentially, enough people thought it would be OK.

[Anonymous No.3843725]

>>3843712
>Essentially, enough people thought it would be OK
That's generally not how the government works, not in the UK where there's a massive disconnect between them and the public at least. Then again, Brexit happened, so who knows, idiots are in the majority I guess.

[Anonymous No.3843730]

>>3843725
>implying the EU won't just do the very same thing you're doing [e.g. arresting people off of tweets/facebook comments, etc]
Yeah, idiots truly are in the majority, I suppose.

[Anonymous No.3843735]

>>3843730
This law is likely going to affect the rest of Europe, and eventually America, so yes, idiots truly are in the majority.

[Anonymous No.3843776]

>>3843653
Other people besides Americans hate the UK.

[Anonymous No.3843781]

>>3843776
Who and why? From the way I see it Americans seem to hate anyone who isn't American.

[Anonymous No.3843825]

>>3843781
Everyone who was their colony, for one.

[Anonymous No.3843857]

>>3842772
Buy coloured pencils - green, blue and red and use them to draw different parts. Preferably col-erase variants but normal would work too. Helps to not transform the whole construction into a complete mess.

[Anonymous No.3843923]

>>3842924
Wholesome and reasonable.

[Anonymous No.3844985]

>>3842556
This is a really good start. honestly this is easily passing.
It's not 100% perfect, but the rest from here is grasping the subtleties , getting all the bumps to fall in place justt right, getting the tapering perfect...
The only two things I'd like to point out is that the hands feel like they aren't small anouthgh in the end and there's not enough tapering on the arms, as for the second the hip area might need some tweaking.

good work OP keep it up.

[Anonymous No.3845015]

>>3842556
>>3844985
Thought I'd tweak it to actually show how it would look like. Quickly pulled this together.
>made the arms taper more
>made the hips proportional but still big
>tweaked some facial features and body landmarks to match the perspective
>made the head bigger and the legs smaller
>Did a little thing with the hair for fun just to give it an extra dimension of popping out of the photo.
Hope this helps.

[Anonymous No.3845016]

>>3845015
AAAAAnd I forgot the attachment
Dammit

[Anonymous No.3845033]

>>3845016
damn nigga she mad af

[Anonymous No.3845051]

>>3845033
I like my lolis determined ( to get hugs)

[Anonymous No.3845077]

>>3845016
>fix

[Anonymous No.3845087]

>>3845016
Downplays her hips and collarbones too much.

[Anonymous No.3845090]

>>3842556
The thighs are way too far apart imo, looks pretty creepy. Other than that it's nice.

[Anonymous No.3845092]

>>3845016
Now she just looks like a blobby mannequin without and definition. The original had structure, the problem is that the forms (especially those of the hips) don't wrap around the body properly making it look like she's just a 2D projection in perspective.

[Anonymous No.3845143]

>>3842556
How do you even draw lines like that.

[Anonymous No.3845145]

>>3845090
Yeah I agree with this anon. when you're feet are together your knees should touch together, unless you're knock kneed in which your knees touch before your feet

[Anonymous No.3845174]

>>3845090
I think it looks very interesting and good.

[Anonymous No.3845193]

Why the fuck is this thread still on the front page? Are you autists that buttmangled by a fucking flat chest? If it bothers you this much just pretend it's a fucking boy

[Anonymous No.3845194]

>>3845016
Brought to you by the Made It Worse™ foundation, courtesy of /ic/.

[Anonymous No.3845199]

>>3845193
>Why the fuck is this thread still on the front page
Because retards like you keep bumping it. also
>front page

[Anonymous No.3845214]

>>3842671
>Wont someone please think of the imaginary children!

[Anonymous No.3845247]

>>3845077
>>3845087
>>3845092
>>3845194
If you think my correction is faulty why are you bumping me? If you have a correction that you think would help OP by all means do it.

[Anonymous No.3845251]

>>3845247
>bumping me
We're not bumping you, we're bumping the thread to tell you how shitty your correction is. Now do it again properly. Chop chop. 8)

[Anonymous No.3845271]

>>3845193
>front page

[Anonymous No.3845331]

>>3842607
Yes you fucking piece of shit triple nigger

[Anonymous No.3845380]

>>3845251
God. Imagine being this big a fan of dicks. No wonder the kid can't think straight.

[Anonymous No.3846506]

beyond the mere overlapping of shapes.
Focal depth (closer objects get narrower from point to point because they occupy a bigger portion of your visual field) and the distance the subject moves away from the picture´s center gives hints of how the shape converges (objects at the peripheral part of vision are seen more completely than those in the center of vision; if they are not perpendicular to the direction of view, in which case there would be almost no difference at all).

[Trollchan !!XhQDOznbDw3 No.3846610]

>>3842556
That´s just perspective. Even if you use a 3D model as reference, there´s no accuracy because it can change drastically with lens value, so just try to make it look good or convincing - and only pay attention to feedback given by a real artist and ignore the rest. Those come with OC relative to the thread, which 12 year old and wannabes can´t make.

[Anonymous No.3846613]

>>3846610
We've missed you faggot. Where the hell have you been?

[Anonymous No.3846643]

>>3846610
pic unrelated i guess

[Anonymous No.3846671]

>>3845016
Wtf nigga now it looks like a real child

[Anonymous No.3846682]

>>3843369
Hi krenzcushart

[Anonymous No.3846830]

>>3843041
That’s some good shit anon where’d you find them?

[Anonymous No.3846875]

>>3842607
is that, shamefull thoughts im reading?? are you perhaps aroused thinking on that cute tiny body??
do you go to art galeries and get a hardon on little girls paintings too??

[Anonymous No.3847221]

>>3842924
>>3845331
ironic

[Anonymous No.3847248]

>>3845016
>right: gained 1000 followers
>left: lost 200 followers

[Anonymous No.3847535]

>>3842556
I tried

[Anonymous No.3847545]

>>3845016
It seems fundamentals can't cure shit taste.

[Anonymous No.3847621]

>>3847535
You failed.

[Anonymous No.3847627]

>>3847535
you can't even draw the 3/4ths view you smug fuck

[Anonymous No.3847666]

>>3847621
Alright. Should the head on the second one be lower.
>>3847627
I'm not trying to be smug, but spending an hour to draw a face, when I'm trying to get perspective doesn't do me any good. The face was just a template. I meant no disrespect

[Anonymous No.3847700]

>>3845016
Are you a pedo or something?

[Anonymous No.3847732]

>>3847535
It looks very orthographic.

[Anonymous No.3847736]

>>3847732
I am not that smart. What did you mean?

[Anonymous No.3847740]

>>3847736
>anon says orthographic
>looks up the word orthography instead
Your google must be broken. He means orthographic projection.

[Anonymous No.3847748]

>>3847740
Ah my bad. Thank you for correcting me.
>>3847732
Thank you, I think.

[Anonymous No.3847763]

>>3846671
Proof that people who like loli aren't automaticly pedos, but the guy who did the "correction" is.

[Anonymous No.3847884]

>>3846830
https://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?id=3106986

[Anonymous No.3847892]

>>3842607

[Anonymous No.3848370]

>>3845016
Left is perfect, that is exactly how lolis should look.
Ignore all the faggots disagreeing, OP.

[Anonymous No.3848407]

>>3848370
Wrong.

[Anonymous No.3848427]

>>3847892
>"w-w-we're not pedos, y-y-you're the real pedos"
browse /a/ for half an hour and tell me that again

[Anonymous No.3848451]

>>3848427
>UN rapes children, a lot
>/a/ stays indoors and jerks off to cartoons
Yeah.

[Anonymous No.3848707]

>>3843243
>Attraction to kids is illegal
>Thoughts are illegal
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CYCHRgoZYa0

[Anonymous No.3848803]

>"cartoons are for children"
>"we can't allow sexualized cartoon children in cartoons"
>only show sexualized cartoon adults
>kid starts feeling attraction towards adults thanks to the sexualized imagery in cartoons
>"it's not illegal if the kid wanted"

Who's the pedo now?

[Anonymous No.3848847]

>>3847535
I tried again

[Anonymous No.3848883]

>>3842556
hot

>>3842607
you are the faggot

[Anonymous No.3848914]

I (me) WANT TO FUCK A IMAGINARY LOW DETAILED 2D GIRL, I AM NOT BEING IRONIC, I DONT LIKE 3D, I CARE NOT FOR THE AGE OF THIS 2D GIRL, I JUST WANT ONE.

[Anonymous No.3848940]

>>3848914
Too bad, she already has a boyfriend

[Anonymous No.3848950]

>>3848940
>Getting cucked even in different dimensions
kek

[Anonymous No.3848958]

>>3848914
If you knew how to draw, you could have all the low detailed 2d girls you want.

[Anonymous No.3849390]

>>3848958
Or he could find an artist he likes and pay them to draw lolis.

[Anonymous No.3849509]

>>3847884
Thanks anon

[Anonymous No.3849590]

>>3842607
boo-hoo, cry me a river.

[Anonymous No.3849603]

>>3846682
Lol, I wish I was as good as krenz

[Anonymous No.3849735]

>>3843653
Fuck off limey nigger

[Anonymous No.3849803]

>>3848370
Thanks pleya. No worries, if I took every retard to heart I don't think I would've stayed on 4 chan for too long. godspeed