Gender Differences

[Anonymous No.3829428]

Is it possible to tell if a piece of art was made by a man or woman just by looking at it?

And in what ways do men and women draw differently?

[Anonymous No.3829430]

yes
women can't draw at all

[Anonymous No.3829431]

>>3829428
Why are you so obsessed

[Anonymous No.3829438]

>>3829428
If it's very good or a masterpiece it's made by a man.
If it's ok or bad it can be either by a man or a woman.

[Anonymous No.3829439]

>>3829431
I'm not? I just thought it was an interesting question.

[Anonymous No.3829443]

>>3829439
>interesting question
why?

[Anonymous No.3829448]

>>3829428
There's been fun threads before where posters have to guess the gender of who made each image. I think people got it right more often than not.

Generally women put more priority on surface level appeal and men more on technical skill or subject. I also think girls have an easier time making a consistent style or brand for their work. Maybe because they have to think about their "look" from an earlier age in life in general. And then ofc if they draw stuff with yaoi vibes, or lots of cute girls who are either themselves or who they want to be, that's another clue.

[Anonymous No.3829450]

>>3829428
Generally it seems like women have an easier time making images with good flow/elegance.

[Anonymous No.3829452]

Girls' art usually looks flatter for some reason, though they're also much better at color.

[Anonymous No.3829456]

>>3829428
Female artwork usually seems to be a little more 2-dimensional.

I personally have a hard time telling it apart either way, because you have a lot of females like the Nekopara artist and Haga Yui (of Baka to Test and Lotte no Omocha) drawing moe girls that appeal to a very male demographic.

[Anonymous No.3829457]

>>3829452
As a general rule this is true. Biologically females have better colour perception and males have better spatial reasoning

[Anonymous No.3829459]

Let's play Guess the gender, no cheating! (post art where you know the artist's gender and let other anons guess the artist's gender!)
I'll start!

[Anonymous No.3829461]

>>3829430
>>3829438
men good, wimmin bad
me not /beg/, me good artist

[Anonymous No.3829463]

>>3829439
We had this thread alrwady

[Anonymous No.3829466]

>>3829461
OP probably meant non-asian women artists. Since most asian women artists are extremely good to the point it's mistaken for a man's work.

[Anonymous No.3829471]

>>3829428
stereotypically speaking, there tends to be a divide in interests. you see far more men doing technical hardsurface & mecha style work and more women doing very impressionist & character driven pieces. many women (fujos) also paint men much better than men do ime.

[Anonymous No.3829475]

>>3829459
male

[Anonymous No.3829482]

>>3829471
Don't fujos usually draw flat unrealistic anime style men?

[Anonymous No.3829487]

>>3829466
>asian women don't count as women
Truly fascinating

[Anonymous No.3829494]

>>3829428
guys focus more on their fundies while girls focus more on what looks nice

[Anonymous No.3829504]

also interesting: pixiv breaks it's popularity ratings down based on gender. the differences in interest are pretty clear cut.
>https://www.pixiv.net/ranking.php?mode=female
>https://www.pixiv.net/ranking.php?mode=male

[Anonymous No.3829510]

>>3829487
Asian women are superior to other """women""" is what he was trying to say.

[Anonymous No.3829512]

>>3829504
>Female is almost all pretty boy stuff
>My senses are immediately flooded with loli upon opening the male section
Ebic

[Anonymous No.3829513]

>>3829510
asian men are also superior to other women

[Anonymous No.3829515]

>>3829504
>males draw for the penis
>females draw for literally everything else and sometimes the vagina

[Anonymous No.3829634]

>>3829428
A lot of questions about gender lately.
What's up with that?

[Anonymous No.3829636]

>>3829459
woman

[Anonymous No.3829638]

>>3829513
Asian trannies are the worst.

[Anonymous No.3829703]

>>3829634
Probably pol shenanigans, trying to identify and out ic girls(implying exist) again, this time by works

[Anonymous No.3829707]

>>3829703
>X trying to damage any artists group
THIS MEANS WAR

[Anonymous No.3829713]

>>3829703
That sounds like conspiracy theorist bullshit to me.

[Anonymous No.3829715]

>>3829459
a man

[Anonymous No.3829730]

>>3829428
Women are like children who plays the game. They are focused and they have no brakes. If they go for a thing, it would be just that thing with no other thoughts. Of course, there can be exceptions.

[Anonymous No.3829733]

>>3829730
holy fuck you just described my entire life

[Anonymous No.3829745]

>>3829634
Just to stalk the female artists and attempt to scare them off the internet. Just normal anonymous imageboard stuff.

[Anonymous No.3829757]

>>3829430
>>3829730
Women are bad at ar-

[Anonymous No.3829759]

>>3829757
i did not said that you stupid weeb

[Anonymous No.3829760]

>>3829428
Fundamentals are objective so no, not really.

Context matter is the only thing that can distinguish female art from male art.

[Anonymous No.3829763]

There is a difference in themes, aesthetic choices, subject, style etc between men and women in general.

You can tell the works apart most of the time, unless the artists are held back by outside restrictions such as having to produce generic concept art.

[Anonymous No.3829787]

>>3829757
t.

[Anonymous No.3829793]

>>3829428

Male gay artists have the best of both worlds.
The male spatial awareness to draw convincing form and perspective and the female affinity of designing patterns and decorative motifs.

[Anonymous No.3829818]

>>3829793
got any male gay artist examples?

[Anonymous No.3829822]

>>3829763
What are the differences?

[Anonymous No.3829825]

>>3829818
Loomis

[Anonymous No.3829829]

>>3829825
kek

[Anonymous No.3829835]

>>3829793
:3 you're too kind
>>3829818
olly is half-gay
and jace is a girl now, maybe. that's kinda gay

[Anonymous No.3829839]

>>3829793
>>3829793
I guess I'm gay then because cute dictates my art but I strive really hard to makey forms look 3D/believable.

[Anonymous No.3829845]

>>3829822
pol pls go we won't give up our secrets

[Anonymous No.3829850]

>>3829845
I still don't see how you can tell the gender of an artist by the themes, subject, and style they draw

[Anonymous No.3829865]

>>3829459
Wimmin

[Anonymous No.3829892]

>>3829634
/r9k/ has been leaking in lately

[Anonymous No.3829925]

Men good women bad shut the fuck up and draw you nigger

[Anonymous No.3830172]

>>3829459
Dont use pro level artists with enough training there is no real difference this could be any gender. Its more interesting posting amateur art i feel like the gender differences are way more noticable that way.

[Anonymous No.3830179]

Has anyone esle been seeing a lot of the #visiblewomen hashtag on twitter lately? Its annoying as fuck to me the whole point of art online is you put it out there and people judge it for what it is, whoever drew it doesnt matter. If its good it gets attention theres no sexist bias crucade against. It just feels like theyre using their pussy to get attention

[Anonymous No.3830206]

>>3829757
exactly

[Anonymous No.3830210]

>>3829510
>Incel outing himself
Lmaoing at you anon

[Anonymous No.3830220]

goddamn this website is getting more and more incels by the day i swear

[Anonymous No.3830222]

>>3829430

[Anonymous No.3830248]

>>3829730
So, all women are actually autistic?

[Anonymous No.3830256]

>>3830179
>use #visiblewoman tag
>write in post actually you are a cismale

[Anonymous No.3830362]

>>3829430
go ahead and show your art faggot

[Anonymous No.3830368]

I'm a wom artist. Anyone wants a draw-off?

[Anonymous No.3830373]

>>3830368
>wom
>worn
fuck - maybe these are just the same thing

[Anonymous No.3830374]

There are a **few** times I can tell it's done by a girl. If their male ocs have feminine-looking faces it'd most likely be a woman. But there are exceptions like Laovaan who draws mostly pretty anime dudes and occasionally yaoi. There are also female geicomi artists who draw really rough looking men. So I think of you'd try to say "this art is done by this gender" you're likely to be wrong.

[Anonymous No.3830376]

>>3830373
Sorry, I would have said womz but I figure that's plural.

[Anonymous No.3830377]

>>3829428
WHAT IF I DONT IDENTIFY AS A MAN OR A WOMAN

I AM THE SUPERPOSITION OF ALL GENDERS

[Anonymous No.3830379]

>>3830368
>wants a draw-off?
is this like strip poker. Must we disrobe one article after each draw?

[Anonymous No.3830388]

>>3829430
post your work

[Anonymous No.3830394]

>>3829730

[Anonymous No.3830398]

[Anonymous No.3830401]

[Anonymous No.3830402]

>>3830222
a man drew this

[Anonymous No.3830406]

The notion of compartmentalization, collation and the ability to recall information while performing a task is very male.

The capacity to survey, process more diverse/immediate information and view it holistically is more female.

[Anonymous No.3830410]

[Anonymous No.3830411]

>>3830406
Where are these coming from?

[Anonymous No.3830412]

[Anonymous No.3830415]

>>3830411
The Infographics? The major assertion there is in respect to white matter in women's brains, which aids inter-hemispheric connections.

[Anonymous No.3830416]

>>3830411
probably some website that took whatever flawed study this is from and used it to support their assumptions

[Anonymous No.3830419]

>>3830415
Yeah I meant what's the source

[Anonymous No.3830420]

>>3830394
>Males use the left hippocampus while performing spatial tasks
This is very interesting in itself, since it links spatial activity with a lot of stored information. There are appear to be very few studies concerning how this affects male and female artists.

[Anonymous No.3830421]

>>3830394
A woman's ability to switch tasks quickly may enable them to include more elements within a picture... this is particularly noticeable on a Shoujo manga page.

[Anonymous No.3830423]

>>3830419
The scientific source or the author?

[Anonymous No.3830424]

>>3830423
I don't know? I just find it interesting and thought if it was a website I would just go there and read more about it.

[Anonymous No.3830427]

>>3829818
Leyendecker, for instance, there are many of them really. But that anon is full of shit, being gay doesn't magically give you some mysterious female powers of design and decoration.

[Anonymous No.3830436]

>>3829428
This from what I've seen women do as opposed to men, no hard rules just observations of patterns.
>put more emphasis and detail into the outfits and hair then men would
>use softer colors
>tend to care more about it looking pretty/pleasant above other aspects of the image
>tend to plateau at a lower skill level once reaching the point where they feel it's good enough
>they tend to convey emotion more directly through the subjects much less so through the environment

[Anonymous No.3830443]

>>3830436
>>they tend to convey emotion more directly through the subjects much less so through the environment
Interesting, could you expand on this?

>>3830424
https://www.slideshare.net/Proadmire/brain-structural-functional-difference-between-male-female-57499426

[Anonymous No.3830447]

>>3830443
Holy shit, this is extensive. Thanks for sharing anon.

[Anonymous No.3830535]

Guess the gender

[Anonymous No.3830538]

Differences I have noticed, broadly speaking, women tend to:

>have better sense of color
>have a better sense of fashion and makeup, clothing looks trendier and functional in respect to details like straps and zippers
>more detail in hair and eyelashes
>more decorative embellishments like flowers and patterns
>drawn men are more likely to have feminine posing and body language
>drawn men are more likely to have feminine faces
>more likely to stick to themes long term
>when drawing sexual/suggestive artwork they are less prone to partialism and detail is evenly distributed across the piece as a whole

Men seem to draw more environments and more mechanical subjects

I think the differences are pretty obvious when looking at something like porn, where men are apt to really, really exaggerate the trait they are into or put more detail into the thing they are into (like drawing lots of fabric creases around the breasts and crotch and less detailing in other parts of the clothing). Once you get to high enough levels of skill though a lot of these little differences don't amount to much. There are top tier female artists who draw masculine faces and good armor pieces and top tier male artists who can draw beautiful dresses and have an excellent sense of color.

[Anonymous No.3830542]

>>3830535
I'm 99% sure its a female.

[Anonymous No.3830544]

>>3830535
>blue eyes instead of brown
reeeeeeeee

[Anonymous No.3830554]

>>3830535
whos the artist anon?

[Anonymous No.3830557]

>>3830554
Liduke

[Anonymous No.3830572]

Strong emphasis of the character of mechanical objects with realistic detailing, especially weapons and vehicles - is usually a good giveaway of male artists. I dont mean just having used a reference - but really getting into what gives life to the object.

I used to think "childish" or chibi-esque characters, and cutsy bubbly styling was the exclusive domain of female artists. But Im not so sure anymore.

pic not really related

[Anonymous No.3830577]

>>3829428
Yes. Just look the male faces and what kind of hands they have. Women tend to give men a lot more feminine features to hands and fingers.

[Anonymous No.3830582]

>>3829459
gorl

[Anonymous No.3830583]

>>3830394
this is interesting actually

[Anonymous No.3830585]

>>3830535
idk but that's hot

[Anonymous No.3830587]

>>3829428
Lobsters up in this bitch

[Anonymous No.3830588]

lol at the fuckless jordan peterson fukbois in this thread... srsly go git gud instead of wasting your time here

losers...

[Anonymous No.3830590]

>>3830535
stark... i dont feel so good

[Anonymous No.3830594]

>>3830557
thanks!

[Anonymous No.3831108]

>>3830535
100% girl

[Anonymous No.3831144]

am i a man or a woman?

[Anonymous No.3831189]

>>3831144
chick

[Anonymous No.3831235]

>>3829430
it's actually the opposite. women tend to be better at younger ages than men

[Anonymous No.3831241]

>>3829638
How come?

Are they worse than western trannies?

Why?

[Anonymous No.3831669]

>>3829835
>olly
>jace

Who?
Not even sarcastically, actually interested.

[Anonymous No.3831812]

Try to guess this one

[Anonymous No.3831864]

>>3830377
No, you're just retarded.

[Anonymous No.3831867]

>>3830179
Are you actually retarded? The whole point of that tag is to help promote female artists because the art industry, like every other industry, is UNFAIRLY MALE DOMINATED. Imagine being THIS insecure that a woman is doing better than you. I have to laugh.

And no, when you’re a professional posting online, it’s not just about posting art. It’s about networking. You almost become similar to a public figure, so obviously people will want to know more about you. Instead of blaming the women for getting more followers and attention than you for “using their pussy,” maybe blame your fellow pathetic men that will chase after anything with said pussy.
Grow the fuck up and realize that the world no longer only caters to you. NGMI in art or life.

[Anonymous No.3831883]

>>3830179
There's also a lot of visible artists hashtags you could use, you know. There are the meet the artist and art vs artist tags that are very popular and open to anyone.
You can also make your own themed hashtag and get it trending. Much like the people who made up the other hashtags did.
Just saying.

[Anonymous No.3831897]

>>3829428
woman are interested in people and man are interested in things. this is why there is so few female mech designers and why almost every female artist is a good character artist.

[Anonymous No.3831898]

>>3829459
>officelady
man

[Anonymous No.3831900]

>>3830535
Female or gay male.

[Anonymous No.3831937]

>>3831897
It's truer to say that with women, Ideas become People.

With men, People become Ideas.

[Anonymous No.3831939]

>>3831937
lolwut?

[Anonymous No.3831978]

>>3831937
With 4chan, Everything become Memes

[Anonymous No.3831984]

>https://www.instagram.com/olly_lawson/
>https://twitter.com/jwakkawa
>>3830179
>women: have nice hair; employed
>neets: don't bathe; unemployed
who are the real oppressors?

[Anonymous No.3831987]

>>3831984
>>3831669
pls be nice, i'm retarded

[Anonymous No.3831988]

>>3831937
nigga what

[Anonymous No.3831990]

>>3831937
w-whoa

[Anonymous No.3831997]

>>3831867
Jeez someone is certainly triggered. crawl back to whatever tumblr hole you came from and cry more about the pattiarchy. What are you doing on 4chan are you lost? Ill say it again there is no sexist bias to fight against if someones work is good they will be successful. Women actually dominate a lot of professional studios. This hashtag is victim playing bullshit plain and simple. Try using the visibile men tag and watch the twitter sjw mafia ruin your life over it

[Anonymous No.3832010]

>>3831987
Thanks Friend

[Anonymous No.3832014]

>>3831867
t. Taylor

/LAS/ is leaking roasties

[Anonymous No.3832019]

Men art is solely about making your dick hard.
Women art is about making your heart hard.

[Anonymous No.3832020]

>>3830172
>hey guys genders are inherently unequal!
>j-just dont let them actually train and git gud
If we're posting amateur art it all looks like deviantart garbage.

[Anonymous No.3832022]

>>3831997
You’re so ignorant and sexist that I’m actually starting to feel sorry for you. No, they don’t dominate professional studios. And I’m telling you plainly and simply that it exists exactly for the reason of you spewing on about why it shouldn’t. There doesn’t have to be a visible men tag because MEN ARE ALREADY VISIBLE. Is that such a difficult concept for you to grasp?

I can only begin to think of how many women throughout the millienia were put down and their ideas brushed aside or stolen by men, yet your argument is “if your work is good, you’ll be successful.” Except no, that wasn’t the case before, and is hardly the case now. We are JUST seeing a good change in professional fields for representation between the sexes because of people speaking out, taking a stand, and YOU’RE the one being triggered about it because you can’t accept that women are just as good at just as many things as men are. If something as simple as a hashtag celebrating female artists makes you this upset and jealous, your future is looking grim, especially if you have any desire to work in such fields.

[Anonymous No.3832033]

>>3832022
moo says the cow

[Anonymous No.3832034]

>>3832022
What is your end goal? Are you a level 9 communist that needs every career to have every possible subdivision of people represented equally in it? What about the blind ginger left handed community? How represented are they maybe we should make them a hashtag. If anything women have an advantage today. They are more likely to be employed in the creative industries. It doesnt "upset" me i just see it as a pointless effort that will only divide us and grow more resentment between the sexes.

[Anonymous No.3832041]

>>3832022
>Men are already visible by default
>Put down and their ideas brushed aside by men
That's called competitive behavior. Men always shit on each other to be better. Same with non-whites, they had to work hard to be noteworthy of their skills. There are many women in the concept art industry, the reason they don't complain about under representation is due to spergs like you who give them a bad name and are focus more on producing art for the industry.
>stolen by men
[citation needed]

[Anonymous No.3832045]

>>3832022
there are more women in the industry than men. there are more women with art degrees than men. you are not underrepresented just because you personally are not good.

[Anonymous No.3832049]

>>3832022
cringe and roastie

[Anonymous No.3832090]

>>3832022
kek, no need to sperg
, darling

[Anonymous No.3832232]

>>3832034
>It doesn’t upset me
>It grows resentment
Lol
>>3832041
Have you ever been on Twitter?
>>3832049
Incel confirmed.

[Anonymous No.3832236]

>>3832232
Sweetie, get back to drawing, would you?

[Anonymous No.3832237]

>>3832232
>le reddit incel meme
Like clockwork.

[Anonymous No.3832246]

>>3832237
>Hating women and being sexist on 4chan because you’re an inadequate male and will never amount to anything worthwhile in your life
Like clockwork.

[Anonymous No.3832264]

>>3832246
>overly specific baseless projection
Stop being so easily triggered.

[Anonymous No.3832274]

>>3832264
Overly specific? I just described a majority of this website’s users. Baseless? Just say that you hate women and move on with your life. Bye! :)

[Anonymous No.3832302]

>>3832022
>>3832232
>>3832246

>complaining about sexism
>in 4chan
what, do you hate when water gets you wet too?

[Anonymous No.3832320]

>>3832274
I don't, I hate retards such as yourself, don't let the door hit you on the way out.

[Anonymous No.3832367]

>>3831937
omg.. did you smoke cbd before going on here

[Anonymous No.3832384]

>>3831900
>gay male
No, retard.

[Anonymous No.3832392]

>>3831897
>almost every female artist is a good character artist
lmao get the fuck out of here

[Anonymous No.3832499]

>>3831867
>>3832022
we don't need your "protection" or "empowerment", we don't care about "patriarchy", we just want to draw in peace you lot are just making men hate us and treat us all like snakes ready to lash out and give them troubles for no reason
leave us alone

[Anonymous No.3832532]

>>3832384
>retard
so female then

[Anonymous No.3832638]

Sometimes it's really noticeable when the artist was a certain gender. I guess the better you get, the more likely you are to get over your natural bias.

[Anonymous No.3832644]

>>3832638
A general disregard for detailed anatomy and going for pleasant aesthetics seem to be the case for women. And you don't need me to tell you what men draw the most, just look at any male kid or teenager.

[Anonymous No.3832646]

>>3832644
>just look at any male kid or teenager.
So, robots, superheroes, edgy monsters?

[Anonymous No.3832671]

>>3831144
By today's logic, it's up to you to decide.

[Anonymous No.3832681]

>>3831937
Is this such a hard saying, anons?

[Anonymous No.3832684]

>>3832681
90% of this board is stupid as hell, dont worry about it anon

[Anonymous No.3832704]

>>3832646
Exactly. I'd say that's the natural "male bias", cool shit. It's extremely unlikely that you'll find a girl drawing that unless it's a girl who wants to act like one of the boys. Naturally once we grow up, if men want to improve their cool stuff they go for the realism route trying to make it all more detailed and women try to make their artsy drawings even prettier with better colors and rendering.

Of course some people will diverge but I'm fairly sure that's how it goes. An alternate evolution path is artsy boys drawing nude chics, they later on evolve into porn artists. Now that's a fun thought, it's common for boys to be drawing tits since an early age but I don't remember any girl drawing nude Greek guys and dicks.

[Anonymous No.3832718]

>>3832302
Personally I hate it because its so dull and old.
Its one thing to say dumb shit, its another when /asp/incels spread out all over every board and make everything about women.

[Anonymous No.3832757]

Um sweaty.... All +inf genders are identical in every way

[Anonymous No.3832762]

>>3832718
Then what the fuck are you doing in a fucking anonymous board, you dumb cunt?
Do you know what Anonymous means? It means that people are gonna be assholes with each other.
If you're gonna get so offended then go to ResetEra and bitch there about how this place is some secret incel group conspiring to keep female artists down or something.

This reeks of typical GOTIS shit.

[Anonymous No.3832764]

>>3832762
>Man, I'm fine with a few jokes but it really gets annoying after awhile
>OMG STOP BEING SO SENSITIVE GOSH. I SHOULD BE ABLE TO RAGE AT WOMEN ON EVERY BOARD FOR NO REASON

no, fuck off kid. its annoying, keep it in your shitty containment board. (though my rage at asp leaked through, go back to r9k faggot)

nobody is "offended" by you, they're annoyed with how annoying you are about it. Just like nobody was offended by furries, they were just tired of their bullshit.

you are the furry anon. fuck off.

[Anonymous No.3832769]

>>3832764

[Anonymous No.3832770]

>>3832764
>"my rage"
>muh annoyed
>unironically getting mad on the internet
Stay mad, roastie.

[Anonymous No.3832771]

>>3829703
or..you know... someone might actually be curious about gender differences with art? maybe see what one does better over the other?

[Anonymous No.3832773]

>>3832764
4chan is not your hugbox.
If you don't like it here then fuck off, you bleeding cunt.

[Anonymous No.3832774]

>>3832022
>>3831867
I don't really want to perpetuate the whole tone policing thing but I have to say, I see this as not only unhelpful but destructive. You could have conveyed all that information without the insults. And I know, you have every right to say what you want how you want, but as someone who's been strongly considering starting a platform to try to show that there are women and are feminists who legitimately do not hold ire towards men because of these systematic issues, and who further acknowledge how these systems are also harmful to men and want to show we advocate for the betterment of men as well as women, I get so disheartened seeing comments like these. Ones that may have good intent and good info but buried under needlessly inflammatory language. Every instance feeds the idea that feminists and women in general just hate men. I really encourage you to consider taking a more positive approach to help this info spread better if you discuss it in the future.

[Anonymous No.3832775]

>>3832771
For what purposes, obviously once you're at a master/highly professional level you can do everything with some minor variance due to personal experience.
Caring about something so meaningless is only brought up because people want to assign some meaning to gender. In reality it doesn't matter, even if there's some basic trends among beginners, it doesn't apply to upper levels and the reasoning behind it could be extremely convoluted.

[Anonymous No.3832776]

>>3832773
>>3832770
>b-but hug box!
>w-why are you thinking differently than me and having opinions that aren't mine! you shouldn't be allowed in my not-hugbox!

[Anonymous No.3832779]

Good to see that there are only two genders being discussed, folks. She-males don't count.

[Anonymous No.3832780]

>>3830416
it does sound interesting though.
maybe there is some truth to it?

[Anonymous No.3832781]

>>3832776
>just bitched about the way anons talk about wimminz
We're not changing 4chan into tumblr. You're wasting your time, Becky.

[Anonymous No.3832783]

>>3832779
Well someone brought up Jace who is thought to be trans. It reflects quite a lot in Jace's art if so. I saw a lot of images saying things like "let her out" and imagery of women with symbols of freedom like wings.

[Anonymous No.3832786]

Women are awesome, and deserve our respect and love.

[Anonymous No.3832787]

>>3829428
Its really notoceable if a girl draws porn. A majority of them draw the girl being pleasured and touched more and tend to focus more on the face too. Men will focus more on a man being pleasured and what he'd want the girl to be doing to the man. Men are more pleasure based. Women are more emotion based.

[Anonymous No.3832788]

>>3832771
nice try /pol/

[Anonymous No.3832789]

>>3832783
So in other words, shit art.
>>3832786
Real women are awesome, not the crap you kids call girls nowadays. Am I glad I grew up in a generation where women were women.

[Anonymous No.3832790]

>>3832788
>being such an insecure woman you don't even debate what women do better than men as a counter-argument

fucking hell, at least make yourself look good

[Anonymous No.3832791]

>>3832789
Where are these diet women

[Anonymous No.3832793]

>>3832790
sorry I don't want to waste time debating

[Anonymous No.3832794]

>>3832775
why would you want to disregard gender differences and how it plays a role in the world?
women and men do things better than one another in art and style. why not try and rationalise what that may be? if you do, you could make some sick art if you decide to collaborate with men.

[Anonymous No.3832796]

>>3832384
Now I'm curious about what the specific differences are between gay art drawn by women and gay art drawn by gay males. What is it that gives it away? So bisexual men draw gay art the same way gay males do?

[Anonymous No.3832798]

>>3832791
Back in the 80's, kid. Sorry you have to grow up with the shit today. I feel for you.

[Anonymous No.3832801]

>>3832793
then your wasting your time trying to prove a point.
if your not willing to debate, how can you engage and defend yourself with words? might even make other people similar to you look better in the process

[Anonymous No.3832803]

>>3832776
>>w-why are you thinking differently than me and having opinions that aren't mine!
but that is you

[Anonymous No.3832806]

>ywn be born intersex thus having the most glorious skills of them all

[Anonymous No.3832808]

>>3832794
>why men/women do something better
because they don't at a high level, you know, where it actually matters.

trying to rationalize why a female amateur and a male amateur are skilled in different things is meaningless because neither of them have trained for real and the differences between them can be just explained with interest. which can also be explained by basic social raising, if girls are told to like flowers, they'll draw flowers. if boys are told to like hot wheels, they'll draw hot wheels.
But when you take both and give them professional training, they can both draw fields of roses or speed racing. So why did it matter other than to make some stupid claim about something that's probably wrong anyways?

[Anonymous No.3832809]

>>3831867
Have you actually seen the tag? It's completely filled with the usual industry artists and all the smaller ones that actually need the visibility (hence the tag name) get buried real deep into the tag results.
The tag might have good intentions, but it is just being used as self fellacio for the industry artists to show off.

[Anonymous No.3832815]

>>3832809
Not her, but you have a point. Do you know what those smaller artists did as a result? They created other hashtags, at least two that I've seen. They were along the lines of "#smallartists" or something like that. And I found out about that because a handful of the industry pros I follow picked up and boosted the tag by retweeting their work. It doesn't have to be a battle, there is always room for more people to have their voices heard.

[Anonymous No.3832816]

>>3832808
thats wrong.
gender plays a role in what interests you. i had a cousin who was naturally drawn to war films and games despite it being out of his reach and had aunts who were very keen on learning to sew and keep order to stop fights from breaking out between boys.

obviously, you'll have exceptions to the rule but to disregard physiology in the body is foolish. just look at the interests female vs male artists have; what makes you think the structure of the mind and body doesn't play a role in that?

[Anonymous No.3832820]

>>3832816
Theres too much shit that goes into what interests people for it to matter and give any real claims. There'll always be girls into foot and boys into playing house.
And for every "environment focused" girl theres a girl that draws nothing but men fucking each other. For every guy that draws loli shit theres a dude that draws vehicles.

It doesnt mean anything and you're trying to analyze something in a way that affirms your own intuition which means anything you conclude is filled with your personal bullshit bias.

Why does "physiological differences" matter if when given training the differences disappear?

[Anonymous No.3832867]

Ballon tits vs upside down dick.

[Anonymous No.3832876]

>>3832820
its not personal bias or bullshit.
obviously people will have their preferences but genealogy plays a role in human instinct. if someone is interested in other things, that is completely natural.
every biological being on the earth is curious about the world around them but their core root and evolution will be predisposed towards certain affinities based on their genes.
im not basing this 'accusation' on intuition but from from nearly 2 decades of interactions with people from all kinds of backgrounds, and for a fact, these differences are highly evident in color perception and artistic sensibilities across the entire spectrum, and even on a geopolitical and environmental scale.

artists will like certain niches and ticks more than others because there are things about them that can gel well with the personality and instinctual chemistry that their body finds appealing, because those curiosities satiates those certain dispositions, to the point it can morph and evolve over different skills and other interests where they overlap and lend those affinities to developing other skills and interests, to the point where it can morph the mind and to an extent, the structure of the human body.

also, the physiological differences can be imitated given the correct training and exposure but the mind will also be geared towards their own biological preferences irregardless, but that can be watered down too given the correct training and environmental circumstances. but no matter what, the chemical infrastructure of the body and mind plays a very significant role in what anyone is geared towards.

everyone here, no matter what they would like to think, is guided by the limits of their body. you can train yourself to rid of certain things out of your system but they won't ever truly go away, and sometimes, depending on what that may be, might not be a bad thing.

[Anonymous No.3832881]

>>3832876
You're asking on 4chan, nothing you find out here will have any merit, you're just looking to confirm your own bias with other people's bias.

Hence its useless and you're retarded. hiding behind pseudoscience doesn't make you any more intelligent.

[Anonymous No.3832884]

>>3829513
They're not. I have 3 friends that married in Japan and brought their wives to my country, they're all nice and funny but as shallow (from a man's point of view) as other women. (average women that is)
I've also met a few dozen more briefly in Japan and same shit. They're cute, their nerd culture is great, but they're not all otaku or anime girls.

[Anonymous No.3832888]

>>3830401
>designed to detect motion

T. Rex

[Anonymous No.3832889]

>>3830410
>larger emotions
Yeah no shit

On the other hand men are socially retarded. But then again isn't society itself kinda retarded.

[Anonymous No.3832890]

>>3832881
what i am talking about is not pseudoscience. its genuine experience and intereactions with people and learning to learn more behind the character.
and i don't approve of the sexism from some of the comments here and i don't approve them on the opposite side either.

both men and women are different. we might be human but we're all different in very unusual ways and being either or the other isn't that particularly important in the grand scheme of things, but they ARE important in the here and now.

i would like you to not be so dimissive. you clearly don't like the notion that people might have an understanding of things that you may not comprehend but there are truths to what people say, even if its disguised under hyperbole. if you expect to grow in maturity, you need to set aside your ego and open your mind up a little more.
you sound like you could do with it.

[Anonymous No.3832902]

Man or woman?

[Anonymous No.3832907]

>>3832881
>You're asking on 4chan, nothing you find out here will have any merit, you're just looking to confirm your own bias with other people's bias.
I'm not ok with this. I know most people just wanna vent and confirm bias, but personnaly I like reading other's opinion, check sources, think for myself, and I changed opinions a fewt times after reading or hearing people contradict mine online.

[Anonymous No.3832944]

>>3832902
I know the answer so I'd be cheating but dorohedoro is a great manga

[Anonymous No.3833090]

>>3832907
>opinions
which isn't a science, you're not making analysis based on anything in reality its faggots giving their own opinions.
>>3832890
you need to learn some english before you start acting pretentious.

and you've ignored the point multiple times,
if people get to the same level with training, there obviously isn't that notable of a difference between the sexes. all you're noting is the difference in what interests them before they get skilled, which is highly volatile and subjective. this means nothing to anyone except determining what people are raised to enjoy, which isn't something relevant to art.

[Anonymous No.3833239]

>>3830535
Gay.

[Anonymous No.3833268]

>>3829760
but art really isn't about the fundamentals, now, is it ?
The fundamentals are but merely a tool you need to create art. They have nothing to do with what you're trying to convey.

[Anonymous No.3833273]

>>3830535
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=YaG5SAw1n0c

[Anonymous No.3833333]

>>3832774
Not that anon, but do a count of all the insulting comments in this thread directed at women and then do a count of the ones directed at men and then decide who's being inflammatory, anon. People are only responding in kind, it's unfair to demand some posters be polite to get their message across whereas others can scream about "roasties" in every thread on ic and you don't argue that maybe they should practice a positive approach.

[Anonymous No.3833345]

>>3833333
As they say, an eye for an eye leaves everyone blind.
I do ask others to practice a positive approach, just in a different way than I did with you because each case needs a different thing. See my posts here >>3831883
>>3832815
I suggested that those frustrated by FOMO on trendy hashtags could address that more constructively than simply getting angry about it. Also I recognize that their inflammatory language comes from their lack of understanding, so rather than try to ask them to speak more politely which would only address the surface issue, my hope is that with education that behavior will change. I don't want to just force them to speak more politely emptily, I want them to no longer want to speak with vitriol for legitimate reasons that come from within them.
1/2

[Anonymous No.3833349]

>>3833333
With you on the other hand, I said what I did because you're in a different position. I said you have every right to speak how you want but I'd like you to consider what your goal is. Do you want to change people's minds or do you just want to make them feel bad? If you care at all about making an actual difference, then I again encourage you to consider if the way you went about it here is an effective approach. Judging by all the immediate rejection of what you said, from my POV it wasn't. And every time I see this happen, it looks just as ineffective. Your posts were effectively the same as the anon who was, basically, whining. Just futilely spouting anger about something they can't control rather than trying to actually do something about it. So I gave them an option to funnel their anger into something constructive, and I offered the same to you, albeit in a different form to fit your differing situation.
2/2

[Anonymous No.3833354]

>>3833345
Again, not that anon, and get back to me when you've got those numbers. How about demanding politeness from both sides instead of targeting the one you disagree with?

[Anonymous No.3833363]

>>3833354
If you'd read my post you'd have seen that I didn't demand anything, that I do want both sides to be better and I replied to people from both sides saying as much, and on top of all of that I _agree_ with the principles of the inflammatory posts, but I think there are more effective ways to deliver the message. In fact I think that kind of delivery hurts the message, and I'm speaking up because I consider it too important to let that kind of damage be done to it and stand uncontested.
Further, I'm not even necessarily suggesting "politeness". My own posts were a little passive aggressive and sarcastic, because in this venue I know that won't be too off-putting and can even help a post resonate. I'm only saying a post that starts off with "are you actually retarded" isn't likely to be received well. This isn't about "being nice" to the other person, this is just good strategy. I'd just like to see people on this side of the issue use that energy to sway people not shame them.

[Anonymous No.3833492]

>>3829430
The most impressive rendering I've seen is made by a woman

[Anonymous No.3833504]

>>3830377
I don't know anon, I guess you're non-binary. Post your work.

[Anonymous No.3833510]

>>3832671
keep seething lmao

[Anonymous No.3833518]

>I don't agree with this
>>3832302
>actually it's the popular opinion here, don't complain about the status quo
>>3832718
>I'll compromise, but I still disagree with extremism
>>3832762
>fuck you for criticizing the status quo
>>3832764
>no
>>3832773
>this is not your hugbox, stop challenging my beliefs!
>>3832776
>if this isn't a hugbox why are you trying to supress different opinions?
>>3832803
>n-no u!
fascinating

[Anonymous No.3833522]

>>3829430
Art is one of the only fields where I think it really doesn't matter if you are a male or female. Some of my fav artist are bitches

[Anonymous No.3833540]

>>3829430

[Anonymous No.3833715]

>>3832762
They won't because they are likely **from** ResetEra. I guess they're trying to save our souls and convert everyone to their sad, bitter, pompous strain of Puritanism.

[Anonymous No.3833736]

I really like her art

[Anonymous No.3833739]

>>3833736
good shit yo

[Anonymous No.3833890]

>>3833736
unironically, i love shit like this. not a fan of her color pallet though.

[Anonymous No.3833907]

dunno the gender of the artist but i suspect is a wimin, what do you think?

[Anonymous No.3833910]

>>3833907

[Anonymous No.3833917]

>>3833910
s/he draws exvotos like the shit frida kahlo made mainstream but ironically using this kind of references and inner jokes from certain ib, which i'm not spamming but i wonder artist's gender

[Anonymous No.3833919]

>>3832718
What does pro wrestling have to do with inceldom?

It's almost like you don't know shit about 4chan?

[Anonymous No.3833924]

>>3829430
Fpbp

[Anonymous No.3833954]

>>3833736
Neat
Not sure if woman or asian trap
>>3833907
It's a grill

[Anonymous No.3834550]

>>3833917
what the fuck even is this shit

[Anonymous No.3834574]

>>3831984
>https://twitter.com/jwakkawa
>half the posts are sperging about being mind-raped, being poisoned with dude weed lmao and being born intersex but his parents forced him to become supermale or some shit
I'm sorry but what the fuck

[Anonymous No.3834584]

>>3834574
Intersex is the new "it's ma'm", a lot of trannies are identifying as such so they can argue that even if they're manly they have no Y chromosome or they have an imaginary ovotestis and you're a fucking monster if you dare to ask for probes.

[Anonymous No.3834586]

>>3834584
It's funny because intersex conditions are actually pretty damn rare. If a tranny claims to be be intersex, press X to doubt.

[Anonymous No.3834587]

>>3834586
I'm really more concerned by the paranoid schizo ramblings

[Anonymous No.3834590]

>>3834587
>>3834574
wakka was an art director on the sims at one point. schizophrenia is no joke

[Anonymous No.3834591]

>>3834587
I wonder what came first, the schizophrenia or the trannyism?

[Anonymous No.3834593]

>>3834574
Holy fuck their art is amazing, but damn, it's a shame their mind is absolutely fucked.

[Anonymous No.3834612]

>>3834593
https://twitter.com/jwakkawa/status/1082094874562883584
fuck, man...

[Anonymous No.3834613]

>>3834574
Wait, Wakkawa's a tranny now? That's hilarious, though not entirely unexpected, considering how psychotic he is. Also puts some of his old, insane rants on /ic/ into perspective, considering how much he used talk about how guys couldn't draw attractive girls, and how women loved his nude drawings.

[Anonymous No.3834619]

>>3834612
damn he has pretty cool stuff but very little twitter engagement, 8 likes no comments average, why?
>>3834550
modern spic hagiography

[Anonymous No.3834621]

>>3834619
Probably the schizo posts chased away a lot of the current and potential followers.

[Anonymous No.3834624]

>>3834621
>16 patrons/ $121mo
I've seen way more autistic drawfags and trannies making 500 or more, what a waste

[Anonymous No.3834698]

>>3834621
I also suspect if he replied to anyone it was either hostile or really weird. A lot of his replies to people here are like that.

[Anonymous No.3834727]

>>3829428
Reminder that obsessing about gender and how much the opposite gender has "oppressed" you will do absolutely nothing to improve your art.

(Looking at you, ladies.)

[Anonymous No.3834730]

>>3834727
>implying most of the best artists here aren't femanons

[Anonymous No.3834747]

>>3834730
Vagina pics or didn't happen.
Don't forget to timestamp them.

[Anonymous No.3837773]

So what do you guys/girls like to draw and what do you think you'd be drawing if you were the opposite gender?

[Anonymous No.3838093]

>>3837773
>tits
>dicks

[Anonymous No.3838400]

>>3829428
There’s literally no difference, I don’t fucking get you guys. At best you can guess from what they are depicting with the drawing since Males and Females naturally have different interests but there are countless exceptions that it barely matters.

[Anonymous No.3838973]

>>3834574
THAT'S what happened to Jace Wallace (Wakkawa)? Holy shit that is heartbreaking. For those who are unfamiliar with him years ago he was a hot ticket artist; he had fanart series that were viral darlings, was super duper popular on deviantart and got hired on as art director at EA right after graduating from Ringling. He was very skilled at a young age with a bright looking career.

And sad to say but his artwork has definitely deteriorated. He always pretty much just drew pretty girls but he had interesting compositions, color palettes and themes. Now its just bland headshots of pretty girls without all the thought and care that previously made them interesting. His faces used to look more balanced against the highly rendered skin but he got stuck on this overly anime clashing face design that looks like fuckin' Alita. Its so weird seeing so little engagement on his work and so odd seeing him sperg out like that, he was really introverted and barely engaged with his fans at all. I remember talking to the dude. wtf.

this was funny though

[Anonymous No.3838977]

>>3838973
Holy fuck is that jace. Hahaha jesus, he used to hang with ytcracker who was a smelly cunt irl apparantly.

[Anonymous No.3839017]

>>3838973
>>3834574
Out of curiosity I went digging, he's nuked himself everywhere but the Penny Arcade forums. He was evidently still well and employed in 2013 through early 2014, at which point he was laid off and months later he is displaying clear signs of mental illness. His scary twitter rants heavily imply his girlfriend of that time left him. This is just sad.

I did manage to find the texture he uses for freckled skin though, if anyone is curious.

[Anonymous No.3839103]

>>3830535
Man. Bitches don't understand The Gay.

[Anonymous No.3839108]

>>3838973
lel

[Anonymous No.3839114]

>Jace Wallace
https://artists-beware.livejournal.com/892163.html
can't make these horror stories up

[Anonymous No.3839926]

>>3829459
>>3830172
guess the gender?

[Anonymous No.3839945]

>>3830222
Incorrect.

[Anonymous No.3840011]

>>3832789
silence boomer

[Anonymous No.3840148]

>>3839926
Female?

[Anonymous No.3840149]

>>3839926
ftm

[Anonymous No.3840472]

>>3830542
>>3831108
>>3840148
>>3840149
Can you say why you think it? Just curious.

>>3832796
>>3831900
Gay male draw bara. Also the artist identify herself as female.

[Anonymous No.3840522]

>>3830394
>right brain vs left brain
Fuck this pseudoscience bullshit.

[Anonymous No.3840543]

>>3840522
The only thing about left-right brain that's been debunked is that the entire half of either side o the brain controls the entire half of either side of the body. There are still different areas that light up during different tasks. And out of that entire list only one, the last one, even mentions left or right.

[Anonymous No.3840661]

>>3839926
It's pretty stiff, desu. No impact.

[Anonymous No.3840751]

>>3831867
>>3832022
Go back, Tumblrfugee.

[Anonymous No.3840757]

>>3840472
>Also the artist identify herself as female.

[Anonymous No.3841736]

>>3834612
this stuff reminds me of the shit on the walls in Portal

[Anonymous No.3842398]

>>3832392
But it's true

[Anonymous No.3842402]

>>3839114
>150 for 2 fully rendered characters and a background
jesus wakka why you gotta undercharge like that?

[Anonymous No.3842425]

I really can't tell desu.
I'm a woman myself and I paint detailed weird or fantasy sceneries. People tell me that my colour choices are great. They either have a warm/pleasing to look at colour palette or something striking and clownish. Yes I do draw extremely feminine looking men. It's deliberate, since I'm not really a fan of beards and massive biceps (perhaps because I grew up watching anime?).
That's basically some of the points about female drawings on this board I can relate to. But idk about the "men pay attention to the technicality of surroundings where as women care about the characters". I have see both male and female artists equally good at both.

[Anonymous No.3842449]

>>3832876
Maybe you should quit getting high off the Jordan Peterson cyanide and clean your room

[Anonymous No.3842487]

>>3832704
>but I don't remember any girl drawing nude Greek guys and dicks.
The girls who like anime definitely draw gay anime content, including pornography.
Actually, in general, if they're into geek stuff, they'll probably draw hot men and/or gay material.

[Anonymous No.3842509]

>>3842487
Truth.

[Anonymous No.3842511]

>>3829428
I'm a straight guy and they say my guys look like they're drawn by girls, they're very feminine

[Anonymous No.3842513]

>>3842511
Pyw?
Please?

[Anonymous No.3842520]

>>3842513

[Anonymous No.3842534]

>>3842520
I like it, although it's not quite what I was hoping for.
You probably just need to use straighter/sharper lines and people wouldn't think your work looks like it was drawn by a girl. But yeah a pose like that will be considered feminine by a lot of people. My mentor told me generally speaking any pose with the legs closed together comes across as feminine, so that might be something to pay attention to when you're drawing.

[Anonymous No.3842668]

>>3842449
Jordan Peterson bores me to tears. I don't see the point in listening to him when I already expect to know what comes out of his tony little mouth.

And, I already cleaned my room before you told me to. I'm a big boy who don't need no cootie tooties. Go and clean YOUR room.

[Anonymous No.3843374]

>>3842487
I think what that anon meant is girls tend to draw feminine twinks, often because of shoujo anime, and rarely they ever draw strong muscular men with beards, which is usually what gay and straight men draw.

[Anonymous No.3843395]

>>3829430
First post bait post

[Anonymous No.3843430]

>>3829428
Sometimes you can easily tell by the subject matter and style, but sometimes not. This is informed by cultural norms and individual bias. Unless it's a very distinctly masculine or feminine style or has obvious tells, it's a crapshoot.
By the way, what do you think? Male or female?

[Anonymous No.3843431]

>>3843430
Female.
The facial expression on the lefthand character gives it away for me. It has a very tumblr-ish vibe overall.

[Anonymous No.3843457]

>>3843430
It's easy to tell in context. It takes more than a single piece but once you find a pattern, it's obvious. It's not style or subject but presentation and focus in a specific context.

[Anonymous No.3843524]

>>3843431
>It has a very tumblr-ish vibe overall
Guess I'll die then

[Anonymous No.3843587]

If it's very bad, tacky, yaoi, tumblr-ish or all the aforementioned, it's probably by a female

[Anonymous No.3843672]

>>3843457
http://imgur.com/a/L8SjnO3
That's reasonable. I'll submit my (terrible, unfinished) artwork from my digital sketchbook here and anyone can guess whether I'm a dude or an 'ette.

[Anonymous No.3844132]

>>3843374
Not really true, depends on what they're into. If they're less into Japanese media and more into western content (superheroes, western vidya) then they wouldn't do so.
Speaking of strong muscular men with beards, this is one of my favourite female artists:
https://www.deviantart.com/aenaluck

[Anonymous No.3844356]

>>3843672
It's a grey area. The girls aren't hot but still pretty and there's a lot of facial expressions that are goodish (but creepy and need some work) and the linework makes me think grill, but I'd need more to be conclusive. It takes finished work. The total lack of decent clothes and alien work is male, but almost homogay. It's also too beginnermediate content wise with the sketches, you can tell more from childish doodles or finished art. Color and composition are part of the equation. A huge part. The difference between other fags and tomahawk wounds is in the details. There are different types of fastidiously clean (or loose) work and color correction.

I'm going with grill until I see your bepis. I usually only have trouble guessing with certain types of humorous homoerotic fanart.

[Anonymous No.3844524]

>>3844356
Understandable. I'm a huge faggot that never actually does finished work, but I do have this.
Also, half of my pictures got abducted by data vampires so I had to upload them to another album.
http://imgur.com/a/hJ0e9aV

[Anonymous No.3844534]

male or female?

[Anonymous No.3844553]

>>3844534
Hard to say due to the abstract and ambiguous nature of the work.

[Anonymous No.3844571]

>>3844553
here’s a drawing of a human (kind of)

[Anonymous No.3844622]

>>3844534
>>3844571
These are really nice. I'm gonna say female.

[Anonymous No.3844678]

WLOP has a very feminine artstyle, people observing the art will assume it's a "he" drawing it despite the artists gender being unknown. Sakimi Chan on the other hand is a woman, you wouldn't know it's actually a woman drawing girls with big titties if it weren't for her yaoi-esque art. She also doesn't draw twinks.
I think the visibleWomen hashtag is kinda lame because from what I've seen, many of the best artists on instagram are female. They range from yaoi line art to highly complex environment art.
This isn't the best place to ask that question. This is 4chan, you wouldn't be surprised to expect someone use pseudoscience to claim "women make badly drawn yaoi art". They want to inject their beliefs about women not being able to pick up a brush and paint a tree because they lack testosterone.

[Anonymous No.3844681]

>>3844534
Female

[Anonymous No.3846191]

>>3844524
are you black?

[Anonymous No.3846201]

>>3843524
/ic/ calls anything stylized that isn't anime "Tumblr" even if you have absolutely no Tumblr influence. Don't worry about it.

[Anonymous No.3846202]

>>3843672
you draw proportions similar to mine, they're unappealing to a lot of people but I don't know how to fix them into something more cutesy

[Anonymous No.3846210]

>>3844524
>>3843672

You got a blog? I really like your stuff cause you can tell you know how to visualize 3d forms into 2d. i struggle with that a lot right now.

[Anonymous No.3846213]

>>3846191
Why, because the thighs on picrelated are THICC?
But no, I'm not black.

>>3846202
Huh, I wasn't aware that they were unappealing. I rarely ever get feedback since I never show anyone my work.

[Anonymous No.3846218]

>>3829463
There are no new threads.

[Anonymous No.3846220]

>>3846213
it's because you draw like a nigger

[Anonymous No.3846221]

>>3846210
I can't telly you how happy that makes me, it's really the only thing I can do semi decently.
Unfortunately I don't, I do have a tumblr but I haven't really posted to it in years. I'm probably going to delete and remake it because what's on there is really cringy (not so much the art as the text, I hate my younger self for being such an autist)

[Anonymous No.3846223]

>>3846213
I don't mean unappealing in the sense they're ugly, they're good proportions
just that they're not very appealing to people because they like very cutesy manga style stuff in general

[Anonymous No.3846227]

>>3846213
All of your characters have very African looking facial proportions and facial feature shapes. I think that’s what Anon was trying to get at.

[Anonymous No.3846229]

>>3846220
I walked right into that one.

[Anonymous No.3846237]

>>3846227
Yeah, I can see that. I have been drawing this one character a lot, with and without hair.

[Anonymous No.3846297]

>>3846221
god i wish we could hang and draw. i need art buddies. and don't apologize for ur tumblr shiz. im pretty sure most peeps got embarrassing skellies in the closet ya know?

but yeah i also really dig the mouths ya do like with the sharp teeth and stuff. looks so nice. i think whatvu got so far could be popular outside of /ic/ most peeps here either just like old masters type art or anime. but also i mean this place literally shits on peeps like ruan jia sooooooo.... ye anyway keep yp the good work!!

[Anonymous No.3847592]

>>3844678
I think Saki's males look twinky, personally. She's not drawing beefy, fuzzy dudes with strong jawlines most of the time.

>>3842668
Don't listen to Jordan Peterson listen to Marie Kondo. She actually tells you HOW to clean your room.

[Anonymous No.3847693]

>>3843672
I know everyone is being hard on him/herself here, but you really should know that you got some nice drawings going on there. It's not bland, it has character, and they look cute. I'd say I'm jelly, but I'm not an envious type, so I'd say it's actually inspirational. I never wanted to draw faces and expressions but now I kinda want to them.

[Anonymous No.3847696]

>>3834590
>>3834613
>>3838973
>>3839017
What the fuck? Is this guy actually a famous person and not just someone who lurks /ic/?

[Anonymous No.3847769]

>Thread is dying.
Finally. Took it long enough.