/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.3821755]

>he doesn't leave his brushstrokes visible

[Anonymous No.3821774]

>>3821755
>he leaves his brushstrokes visible but they lack any sort of fundamental knowledge or direction and he made it because he couldn't control his strokes and thinks it's okay because some art he saw had visible brushstrokes which made it look cool

[not anonymous No.3821776]

P = good art
Q = visible brushstrokes
R = talented artist

yes you are correct in one instance

good art is produced with visible brushstrokes, given the artist is already talented.

[Anonymous No.3821782]

>>3821776
>he makes a "truth-table" to make an excuse of why he's not a professional after only drawing for 2 years

[not anonymous No.3821783]

>>3821776

actually sorry 4 instances came up as True in that last column so:

THE FACTS:

good art can be produced with visible brushstrokes, given the artist is already talented.

bad art can be made regardless whether the artist used visible brushstrokes and is talented.

bad art can be made using "invisible" brushstrokes and the artist is still "talented"

bad art can be produced by a untalented artist who uses invisible brushstrokes.

still only one instance of good art being produced regardless, which SHOULD be the goal.

[not anonymous No.3821785]

>>3821782

>implying i give a shit what you think since you're in the same boat as me

[Anonymous No.3821789]

>>3821785
how do you know you're not talented anon?

[Anonymous No.3821790]

>>3821776
all this did was give me discrete math flashbacks about my shitty professor

[Anonymous No.3821830]

>>3821776
What the fuck is this bulshit.

[Anonymous No.3824323]

>>3821755
yeah huh

[Anonymous No.3826564]

>>3821776
>taking this class right now
>just wanna draw
jesus

[Anonymous No.3826585]

>>3821774
...shit.