/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.3770152]

Is this good art?

[Anonymous No.3770154]

>>3770152
Yes it is, what kind of dumb fuck question is that?

[Anonymous No.3770163]

>>3770152
It's ok.

[Anonymous No.3770516]

yep

[Anonymous No.3770548]

It's great, but I don't know if a human being can survive that

[Anonymous No.3770550]

depends on what the purpose of it is

[Anonymous No.3770805]

>>3770152
Whats the manga, I like SAW-type shit

[Anonymous No.3770812]

>>3770805
Looks a bit like berserk. Particularly Griffith's torture

[Anonymous No.3770814]

>>3770812
That's probably it, I recognize his helmet now

[Anonymous No.3770864]

>>3770152
Berserk is amazing piece of work the amount of detail that's put into and panels and spreads for a manga alone are amazing.

[Anonymous No.3770969]

>>3770152
back when miura didn't worship a single game and let it's moe style influence his art

[Anonymous No.3771055]

It's great comic art and Kentaro Miura is a prodigy of some sort if that's to be said. He accomplished this inking style on the left at the tender age of 10. Something most people probably couldn't do ever really.

[Anonymous No.3771996]

>>3770548
the human body is retarded.
Sometimes it can be killed with a single punch, others, can survive being cutedt in half

[Anonymous No.3772350]

>>3771055
That's from NOA, which was published in 1985. https://mangakakalot.com/chapter/noa/chapter_0

[Anonymous No.3772367]

>>3771055
>10
you must be retarded

[Anonymous No.3772371]

>>3771055
Pretty sure that's from NOA and he was 19-20 at the time. Still pretty good though.

[Anonymous No.3772378]

>>3770152
Miura's stuff looks very static and intricate most of the time, like a gravure. I find this style quite elegant, I like it.

[Anonymous No.3772975]

>>3770152
Wait, aren't pectorials supposed to be above the ribs?

[Anonymous No.3772989]

>>3772975
His are so thinned and fucked that the ribs show through

[Anonymous No.3773003]

>>3770805
>I like SAW-type shit

It's nothing like saw garbage you dumb faggot

[Anonymous No.3773005]

>>3771055
You don't know what you're talking about

[Anonymous No.3773279]

>>3773003
Where'd that come from?

[Anonymous No.3773308]

>>3770152
Vagabond > Berserk

[Anonymous No.3773320]

>>3773308
Imagine actually believing this

[Anonymous No.3775920]

>>3770152
What always seemed implausible to me was that Griffith never lost any teeth during the year of torture. The torturer looked like someone who would go for some tongs the first opportunity he got.

[Anonymous No.3775921]

>>3770969
That panel is literally from one of the very latest chapters, you fucking retard. It's after Casca is healed and she's about to meet with Guts again, but the rest of her memories hit her all at once and she rememebers Griffith's torture and the Eclipse. Stop posting if you don't know what the fuck you're talking about.

[Anonymous No.3775930]

why do people forget that assistants exist and always give mangakas 100% of the credit

[Anonymous No.3775940]

An I the only one that dislikes Miura because alot of his pages seem cluttered and hard to follow?
I mean as a artist he's fucking amazing but when you try to imagine the characters going through the actions it's very hard for me to picture the motion between panels i.e Murata does a amazing job of having a kind of "flow" to the movement of his characters
I also feel he sometimes puts too much detail on background or unnecessary thing and it draws the readers eyes away from the "meat" of the panel
I'm a /beg/fag so what do I know but I just want to see if others share my opinion
His art is still amazing I just feel at times it's hard to follow and you can get easily distracted by unimportant parts of the picture

[Anonymous No.3777145]

>>3775930
explain bleach/hunterxhunter

[Anonymous No.3777660]

>>3775940
its fine if you read it in print but it does get hard to follow if you read it online because Muira loves to draw spreads and alot of his pages make more sense if you take all the detail at once, something which is just not possible if you're reading it on the computer/tablet

[Anonymous No.3777933]

>>3775940
I had the same problem. I had trouble following action sequences, there was too much detail to understand the key movements/events in a panel at times. I did read it on my computer tough as >>3777660 pointed, hadn't thought about that

[Anonymous No.3779828]

>>3773308
If we're talking about art? Yes.
If we're talking about literally anything else? No.

[Anonymous No.3780197]

Do non-autists stand a chance?

[Anonymous No.3782687]

>>3770152
Good art is arguable, but in my opinion yes :)

[Anonymous No.3783538]

>>3775920
Guts never lost any teeth either, despite often using his sword with his mouth and getting punched in the face constantly.

[Anonymous No.3783543]

>>3775940
Sometimes less is more, yes. I prefer simple, clean art styles when it comes to action comics.