/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.3760862]

thoughts?

[Anonymous No.3760864]

>this made her a millionaire in his 20s
life's unfair

[Anonymous No.3760870]

>>3760862

>ah, time to do a redline to show the guys just how wrong the anatomy is!
>but first, let me put on a blindfold and spin ten times in each direction before gripping the stylus with my big toe

[Anonymous No.3760871]

>>3760870
I did it with a mouse in like a minute and I exaggerated it because I was going to show it to a friend who's not an artist. That doesn't mean the anatomy is correct

[Anonymous No.3760873]

>>3760862
Sakimichan pumps out polished pieces like it’s nothing. Stay salty

[Anonymous No.3760875]

why is the redline box so small?

[Anonymous No.3760879]

Whatever. Go draw, jelloboy.

[Anonymous No.3760886]

>>3760862
You should probably learn something, anything, about the fundamentals before redlining someone else's work. The anatomy isn't realistic, but I'm pretty sure that's not the point.

[Anonymous No.3760888]

>>3760886
I'm not an artist. And even I can see the anatomy is wrong.

[Anonymous No.3760892]

>>3760888
>I'm not an artist
Why the fuck are you even posting then shut the fuck up

[Anonymous No.3760894]

>>3760892
I was asking because I want the know the opinion of the "artists" here. I can post whatever I want.

[Anonymous No.3760900]

>>3760862
>>3760864
Im not defending her, personaly i dislike most of her art because it is just the same thing over and over, and not beeing too interesting.
But have you maybe considered that proportions, and beeing anatomicaly correct isn't really the purpose of art like that? Its suposed to be enjoyable and pretty and well rendered thick animu girls. And her beeing successful is pretty good proof that it accomplishes just that.
Its just not suposed to be the study of anatomy.
If you see a pretty landscape of a scenery painting do you point out how colors aren't realistic, or how moon is too big? Whats the point of it other than beeing petty.

[Anonymous No.3760901]

>>3760894
So youre just some fucking autist who needs reaffirmation of his own critique of shit that he doesnt and will never be able to come close to drawing. Kill yourself you fucking fag

[Anonymous No.3760902]

>>3760901
I'm asking for opinions on the original drawing, not on my redline. I know the redline sucks.

[Anonymous No.3760905]

>>3760902
And yet you open the thread with your redline over 20% opacity art, instead of
>original drawing

[Anonymous No.3760907]

Why are we starting to see more and more of these shitty redline threads by autists who don't have the fundies to critique another's work?

I can't understand a damned thing about what this redline is supposed to critique.

[Anonymous No.3760908]

>>3760905

I actually think this is one of the better pieces I have seen from sakimi lately. It does have a sense of weight to it and the flaws are not as apparent as in other pieces (pin sized knees etc)

[Anonymous No.3760910]

>>3760905
why would I ask for critique on a redline on a drawing I didn't make

>>3760907
I was just pointing the mistakes I noticed but, as I said, I'm not an artist. I just wanted to know what you guys think about the drawing's "incorrect" anatomy.

[Anonymous No.3760915]

>>3760908
I don't really look at her art too much, but this one has quite a bit more action to it than alot of her works that are beeing posted around.
Also face is so much better than some of those tiny squeezed korean faces that she sometimes does. So yes id say i like it

But don't worry, OP >>3760862
is on the case of debunking her art with real facts and science.

[Anonymous No.3760916]

>>3760905
The only real critique I have is that the primary spinal twist should happen in the thoracic region near the ribcage, and everything below pulls in the direction of the ribcage. Here it looks more like Tsuyu is twisting her lumbar and everything above is rotated almost evenly. It looks kind of awkward and not as sexy.

But i still jerked off to it so it's good in my book

[Anonymous No.3760920]

>>3760910
We don't care. If you don't draw, or don't want to draw, fuck off. You have no place here.

[Anonymous No.3760928]

>>3760920
fuck you, this isn't your sekrit club for artists, this is a place for everyone to talk about art

[Anonymous No.3760929]

>>3760910
Are you okay?
>>3760902
>im asking for opinions on the original drawing not my redline
>>3760910
>why would I ask for critique on a redline on a drawing I didn't make

I only asked why you didnt post orignal work then if you only wanted to talk about it and not about that shitty redline.

[Anonymous No.3760935]

>>3760929
>im asking for opinions on the original drawing not my redline
>why would I ask for critique on a redline on a drawing I didn't make

you realize these aren't contradictory, right?

[Anonymous No.3760938]

>>3760928
You literally have nothing to contribute to this board's discussion. Normies have no place here.

[Anonymous No.3760940]

>>3760928
that’s literally what /ic/ is
fuck off to your normalfag boards, nigger

[Anonymous No.3760941]

>>3760935
No these are not, but both of those are a bit contradictory with the fact of posting shitty redline over low opacity art piece and saying "Thoughts?"
Anyway i don't think there is much point in discussing that.

[Anonymous No.3760942]

>this is the kind of retarded faggot who “crits” your work and starts retarded discussions about eceleb artists
ahahahahahaha

[Anonymous No.3760944]

>>3760940
>>3760938

[Anonymous No.3760946]

>>3760862
>way to ruin 2 unique characters with normie shit

why can't she even draw the characteristics of the characters properly?

[Anonymous No.3760948]

>>3760905
what's with her arm and why is her right leg so much bigger

[Anonymous No.3760949]

>>3760946
Westerners tend to disregard the original personality of the character and instead make them into complete sluts and whores. I guess to normies it feels closer to home?

[Anonymous No.3760950]

>>3760862
>bitching about popular artist's art instead of working on your own
ngmi

[Anonymous No.3760953]

>>3760944
nice strawman, faggot
you can whine about illustrations all you want, you just need to fuck off somewhere else
/ic/ is for posting work and critiquing posted work, not circlejerking about your astute observations of ecelebs
spoiler alert: your feedback is literally useless and you benefit no one
fuck to kiwifarms, that’s where you cucks belong

[Anonymous No.3760957]

>>3760944
>being so assblasted over your inadequacy that you save fucking minecraft images to defend yourself
AHAHAAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHH

K Y S
Y
S

[Anonymous No.3760961]

>>3760949

Moralfag detected

[Anonymous No.3760963]

>>3760957
>minecraft images
how new are you

[Anonymous No.3760966]

>>3760963
I’m a 2009 newfag
now back to killing yourself

[Anonymous No.3760980]

>>3760949
I think its more of a popculture thing rather than east or west thing.

>>3760946
>>3760949
There are different kinds of art, you look at art piece that is literaly suposed to be well rendered anime titties without much soul or attention to building the character. Can you really blame the art for what it isn't? Like if i look at some ecchi fanart or r34 of my favourite anime character, can i complain oh i really think that people tend to not appreciate deeper values and flaws of this character uniqueness. Its not something missing from that art piece, it just never meant to be there in first place. Its 100% about the appeal.

[Anonymous No.3760992]

>>3760980
>>3760961
No no, I welcome sluts and whores is that's their personality is. I just hate it when the artist depicts EVERY character they draw as the same, 3d porn-traced slut from porn hub. You can go to sankaku now, search for naruto or any other extremely popular 'normie' series and all the top images will look like they've been traced from a porn hub video. It all just feels so lifeless, especially when they have a massive advertisement for their website or patreon plastered over the top.

[Anonymous No.3760995]

>>3760864
While you're so talented and you're a NEET living in your mom's basement, right?

[Anonymous No.3760997]

I want to suck sakimi's snatch

[Anonymous No.3760999]

>>3760862
You're garbage. Learn to draw before you attempt to redline. Ngmi

[Anonymous No.3761008]

>>3760992
Do you really think she knows anything about 99% of the characters she draws? She probably just looks at a couple of pictures then starts drawing.

[Anonymous No.3761014]

>>3760862
>artist tried to convey crazy human frog hybrid in a contorted inhuman way
>OP noticed the thing the artist meant for them to notice
>OP calls it a flaw in the art
I don't care if you criticize Sakimichan but try not to be that much of a brainlet

[Anonymous No.3761015]

>>3760905
For once Sakimeme made a face I didn't fucking hate right off the bat with Tsuyu
That's a thing I guess

[Anonymous No.3761021]

>+60k month
>more than you'll ever make in years

Not fanboy, just facing the facts.

[Anonymous No.3761022]

>>3760905
Can't wait until the nude version.

What's up with her preview link on her patreon page? It's not even a preview, you have to pay for it. Fuck that.

[Anonymous No.3761028]

>>3760992
I definetly agree that its just boring to see pretty much the same thing over and over again, especially this kind of bullshit that doesn't try to be openly erotic because then it would actually need to be good at it, and is sort of trying to be something inbetween, an ecchi splash art at best. But its only meant to be about looking appealing and nothing else, so i can't really blame it too much.
As i said in here >>3760900
Not a fan of sakimichan art as a whole. Her rendering skills are good even tho i don't really like this soft blending sort of a thing, but i bet there is alot of work beeing put into those pieces. And also, this particular art >>3760905
still seems to have more character than alot of other things she made.

[Anonymous No.3761044]

>>3760864
Her work load is probably ridiculous compared to how much money she is making.

[Anonymous No.3761052]

>>3760862
Her spine is in the realm of posibility your redline of the spine is worng, you are right about the glasses though.

[Anonymous No.3761063]

>>3760995
i'm a wagie actually
>>3761044
good point her work ethic is something else.

[Anonymous No.3761163]

>>3760894
>I was asking because I want the know the opinion of the "artists" here.
It's exaggerated. Aka, a. fucking. cartoon.

Cry more when it's actually a realistic human with realistic limits.

[Anonymous No.3761166]

ITT: OP gets BTFO'd by everyone for his stupidity

[Anonymous No.3761172]

>>3761163
>Muh style!

[Anonymous No.3761174]

>>3761172
It literally has nothing to do with style though. She's a human frog. Ever seen a human frog in real life?

[Anonymous No.3761188]

>>3761174
>Argues with being a cartoon with extreme and unrealistic forms
>B-but it literally has nothing to do with style!
The absolute state.

[Anonymous No.3761192]

>>3761174
>Ever seen a human frog in real life?
yes

[Anonymous No.3761195]

>>3761188
Not >>3761163 btw, just saying that it doesn't have to be perfectly realistic. She's a frog girl, so obviously sakimichunga has taken liberties with the anatomy because she's a stretchy-ass anime frog girl. If you want to complain about the anatomy and proportion (which you really shouldn't because you clearly have no idea what you're talking about, you said it yourself), then you should complain about everything that strays even slightly from non-fiction and hyper-realism as well. Case in point, eat my cock whole and leave the board.

[Anonymous No.3761198]

>>3760966
Not them but if you honestly only recognise that image as being "micecraft" (which it isn't lmao), then you are 100% not from 2009.

[Anonymous No.3761199]

The real reason why it's shit is that Tsuyu should be drawn cartoony with big eyes and hands. Period. That's why she's so cute. If you draw her like a realistic girl with all the cartoony shit removed you completely failed.

I don't understand why this board is obsessed with sakimichan, that Russian kid and other hacks with no creativity who can only draw plastic anime garbage for normies. You should look at actual art. Like Jesus fucking Christ nobody ever mentions Frazetta on this board. What the fuck is wrong with you. Please punch yourselves for me and stop looking at this shit.

[Anonymous No.3761212]

>>3761195
>If you want to complain about the anatomy and proportion (which you really shouldn't because you clearly have no idea what you're talking about)
I'm not the other Anon who said they didn't know what they were talking about. When it comes to this chink it is clear that she does not know jack shit from anatomy hence the six finger fiasco she had last year. Take a good look without the fanboy and beta goggles at her figures you will see either an elongated out of proportioned centipede like torso or a cookie cutter hourglass shape that looks like a blown up stiff barbie doll.

To say that this extreme exaggerated "frog girl" figure was intentional is simply incorrect due to the overwhelming evidence from the lack of her knowledge in figure drawing. If you've seen one drawing of her's you've seen them all she practically recycles her pin ups with the same cliche 3/4 view bust shots at cropped angles with the same exact faces which consist of chinks in K-pop esque heavy plastic surgery.

With that being said, fuck of back to whatever discord server you wandered off from and go back to circlejerking about this chink with the other beta orbiters.

[Anonymous No.3761216]

>>3760900
this

[Anonymous No.3761222]

>>3761212
I should probably say I hate sakimi's style for one, but unlike you and everyone else on this board circlejerking on this about about her, I honestly couldn't care less if she's successful or not. If she is, good on her. If she isn't, not my problem. Shitty artist is highly successful and making a fortune off of her shitty normie-pandering artwork? Right, cool. Everyone here seems to care a bit too much, to the point where it just comes off as rage and jealousy. With your current, bitter and petty mindset, you're not going to make it as an artist.

[Anonymous No.3761223]

>>3761222
Not an argument.

[Anonymous No.3761227]

>>3761222
based btfo

[Anonymous No.3761229]

ITT: Salty begs jealous of a pro artist.

[Anonymous No.3761230]

>>3761222
you know you could just have said "ngmi" right anon?

[Anonymous No.3761237]

>>3761212
What a worthless and ngmi post

[Anonymous No.3761241]

>>3761174
>>3761192
cute frog girls

[Anonymous No.3761250]

>>3760905
>Sexualizing tsuyu
:(

[Anonymous No.3761253]

>>3761229
>pro artist.

[Anonymous No.3761270]

>>3760862
Superior trad race here.

I don’t find ANY of the jap stuff appealing, manga, anime, ANYTHING, until today.

I looked this chick up and found her stuff.

Bam nigga!

Now this is has something!

[Anonymous No.3761271]

>>3761253
t. Brainlet who doesn't understand the meaning of a pro

[Anonymous No.3761274]

>>3761270
i really miss when people put effort into their bait, those were the good times

[Anonymous No.3761284]

>>3761253
>earns a living solely through his art
Shadman sold more prints and shirts of his art than you did quick sketches.

[Anonymous No.3761295]

>>3761274
Not bait.
I grew up with bugs bunny and foghorn leghorn and Sylvester and Pepe le pew.

[Anonymous No.3761373]

no one tells us that even when you "learn the rules" in order to break them to make attractive art there will still be stupid fucks on /ic/ to complain about you "breaking the rules" by cherrypicking perfectly okay anatomy choices

[Anonymous No.3761375]

>>3761373
People critiquing sakimichan in a nutshell.

[Anonymous No.3761381]

>>3761198
(different guy)

wtf is it then?

[Anonymous No.3761432]

>>3761270
>Sakimi chan hate threads getting sakimi chan followers
You'd think they stop by now huh.

[Anonymous No.3761440]

>>3760862
Sakimichan is good get over it

[Anonymous No.3761441]

>>3760862
Who is this? Never seen this artist before.

[Anonymous No.3761486]

>HURR SAKIMI IS BAD DO I FIT IN YET

KYS MY MAN LUL

[Anonymous No.3761585]

>>3760905
are they falling? are they going to be ok?

[Anonymous No.3761595]

>>3760900
>beeing
>4 times in one post
Goddamn that hurt to read

[Anonymous No.3761603]

>>3761486
she is hot af

[Anonymous No.3761638]

I want to lick sakimichan's pussy while shes painting /ic/!

[Anonymous No.3761646]

>>3761638
I bet she would taste sour with a hint of salt from all the bitter mojo formed from the collective shitposting of this board alone.

[Anonymous No.3761648]

>>3760905
That pose looks really awkward.

[Anonymous No.3761664]

>>3761648
Careful now, such bold statements that challenges the merit or skill of one Sakimichan would incite a Calvary of fanboys to defend her name and if you know what's good for you you'd start to kiss her ass right now to save face.

[Anonymous No.3761670]

>>3761648
That's because her torso is bent back while her hips are twisted to faced towards the camera. It makes it look like she has some noodle body due the how she tried to connect her torso to her hips to make it work.

[Anonymous No.3761678]

>>3761664
>>3761670
Niggers, I don’t even watch anime or know who that is, and even I know that’s some elastic man type frog girl thing. Do you retards complain about the anatomy of the rubber guy from fantastic four?

[Anonymous No.3761686]

>>3760905
Why does she have her turning her ribcage at such a sharp angle just show her fucking stomach goddamn. It'd probably get more attention than it already has. Cause midriff fags.

[Anonymous No.3761708]

>>3761678
>Do you retards complain about the anatomy of the rubber guy from fantastic four?
No, because the rubber guy's form is clearly intentional just like Spiderman's extreme malleability or Superman's super strength but in the case of this "frog girl" the complete disconnect between the pelvis and the ribcage at right angles from each other is from poor execution by the Artist.

[Anonymous No.3761710]

>>3761678
Tsuyu is not stretchy.

[Anonymous No.3761712]

>>3761710
Not according to all the hentai that I know her from.

[Anonymous No.3761745]

>>3761022
best part about the nude version is sakimichan likely won't even bother with the effects of gravity on her hanging tits and will just keep the same silhouette but just put flesh tone and nipples. kek

[Anonymous No.3761762]

>>3761745
didn't she draw the nude version first then paint the cloth over?

[Anonymous No.3761835]

>>3761708
This is also intentional you, retard. It's called stylisation.

Post your work, /beg

[Anonymous No.3761843]

>>3760905
10/10 saki still got it

[Anonymous No.3761844]

>>3761678
>Elastic man types
>Muh style

[Anonymous No.3761849]

>>3761844
post your work

[Anonymous No.3761856]

>>3761849
not an argument

[Anonymous No.3761857]

>>3761856
So you are a pusy. Got it.

Post your work or shut up.

[Anonymous No.3761858]

>>3761856
Bitching about sakimichan isn't an argument either. Post your work.

[Anonymous No.3761866]

>>3761858
Having an opinion is not bitching. Still not an argument.

[Anonymous No.3761870]

>>3761866
>Still doesn't post his work

Pussy.

[Anonymous No.3761878]

>>3761870
>Still dosen't argument shit

Sakimidrones are so lame.

[Anonymous No.3761887]

>>3761878
>>Still doesn't post his work

jelly begs are so sad.

[Anonymous No.3761889]

>>3761866
your uninformed opinion isn't an argument.

Post your work

[Anonymous No.3761891]

>>3761678
I was explaining to that anon why it looked awkward. If you want me to give her credit then I'll say that she probably "broke the rules" knowing that tits + hips + spread legs = patreon buck$. Doesn't stop Tsuyu from having a broken back though.

[Anonymous No.3761894]

>>3761889
>uninformed
kek

[Anonymous No.3761900]

>>3761894
Post your work.

[Anonymous No.3761971]

>>3761900
You first.

[Anonymous No.3762049]

>>3761971
I am not the one bitching about a pro

Post your work.

[Anonymous No.3762055]

>>3761270
>Sakimichan stuff
>jap shit

[Anonymous No.3762108]

>>3760905
>>3760862
shitposting aside, is that possible? i mean, can the human spine do that?

[Anonymous No.3762120]

>>3762108
The human spine can bend however you want if you're brave enough

[Anonymous No.3762128]

>>3762108
You'd be surprised what the human spine can do with some willpower and training.

[Anonymous No.3762142]

>>3760862
>thoughts
This makes me think that there's more to life than being accurate and represent reality.

I believe the job of an artist is to show something more beatyful than reality, since anything real can be done by a photogapher cheaper, faster and better.
And when trying to showcase aeshtetics of female body I often find myself constraind by the real possibilities of the body.
To show ass, pussy, face, tits, midriff, back, neck, and feet all in one picture is the ultimate challenge the artists were facing since renessance, it's a the artistic holy grail the finest artists are aspiring to achieve, somebody capable of that will undoubtedly recieve the nobel prize for artistry and geometry as well.

And I personally often find myself constrained by reality.
>draw a realistic pose
>boring scrap
>draw a realistic revealing pose
>i did this pose already - scrap
>Draw an inetersting dynami pose
>dowsn't show pussy - scrap
>draw an even more revealing pose
>unrealistic - scrap

I legitimately feel walking in circles and unable to finish anything for this reason. Reality is too boring and fun stuff is too unreal.

Perhaps the answer really is to bend the rules and spines. Human hands are aesthetic amd women have pretty fingers, so why have just 5? More fingers = more aesthetics.

Seriosly the viewers don't have the knowledge and perception to call fucked anatomy or slightly off perstective or unrealistic lighting, they just say WOW PRETTY.
And maybe doing just that is the right choice. If we're drawing fantasy women more beatiful, stronger and more intelligent than the real ones, why not make them more flexible and give them 6 6 fingers? Maybe even 3 tits!


BTW the girl in the picture is a literal frog , so bending out of human bounds isn't even out of her character..

[Anonymous No.3762148]

>>3762049
So? You're defending one, same thing, post your work.

[Anonymous No.3762172]

Damn!

[Anonymous No.3762175]

>>3762172

[Anonymous No.3762182]

>>3762128
This is horrifying

[Anonymous No.3762184]

>>3762172
What does that prove? The pelvis here doesn't even match the picture

[Anonymous No.3762185]

>>3762148
Bullshit

I am not the one critiquing her.You have the burden of proof. Post your work or STFU.

[Anonymous No.3762191]

Look at this retard's drawing. Look at how long the arm is. This faggot doesn't even know proper proportions.

[Anonymous No.3762192]

>>3760905
Not gonna lie bros. That face is very cute.

[Anonymous No.3762194]

>>3762148
It's not the same you brainlet

It's your art vs hers. I am not citiquing any art.

The one that needs to post work is you. Now stop making bullshit excuss and post your work.

[Anonymous No.3762210]

Does Froppy even stretch/twist her torso in the anime/manga?

[Anonymous No.3762213]

>>3762194
It's my art against her? what are you talking about? your argument is so retarded it's really amazing.

[Anonymous No.3762315]

>>3762213
post your work faggot

[Anonymous No.3762398]

>>3761192
based

[Anonymous No.3762494]

>>3760949
Thats what artgerm keeps on saying on his talks, mostly pertaining to sakimi lol.

[Anonymous No.3762606]

>>3761212

Look at this beg, ngmi

[Anonymous No.3762612]

>>3762172

The placement of the model's feet is wrong.

[Anonymous No.3762779]

[Anonymous No.3762790]

>>3762172
>>3762175
OH NO NO NO NO

[Anonymous No.3762806]

>>3762779

So this just essentially turned into a jealousy thread. No real, well-thought-out criticisms of the work.

Putting this out there, I don't particularly like her drawing style nor do I particularly like her subject matter, but you know what? She found her audience, who pays her for her work.

That's more than I can say fbrainletttttor the jealous and bitter /beg/ tier crabs in this thread.

> AAAAAAAAAA I DON'T LIKE THIS ARTIST SHE DOESNT DESERVE THE MONEY SHE'S GIVEN AAAAAAAAA GIVE IT TO MEEEEEEEEEE

Pic fucking related.

[Anonymous No.3762934]

>>3761638
>she traces images of herself, hence the boring ass artwork and dumb faces
>her vaginas come out looking weird as shit

Put two and two together and you're licking a deformed pussy

[Anonymous No.3763137]

>>3762806
i come to /ic/ just for the sakamichi hate general.

[Anonymous No.3763146]

>>3762210
No she's not a stretchy character, she can just jump really high and has a long tongue

[Anonymous No.3763148]

>>3762806
>SHE DOESNT DESERVE THE MONEY

But she doesn't deserve the money. Not for the art anyway. Her art is soulless and awful. BUT... I will say I agree with you. She is a damn genius at marketing. She knows that there is an audience of brainless faggots who slurp up plastic, uncanny valley art of their dumb vidya waifus/husbandos and pay out the ass for that. So good on her for pandering to such a tasteless group of individuals so eager to divorce themselves from their money.

[Anonymous No.3763166]

>>3763148
You are just jealous. She is better than you. Deal with it.

[Anonymous No.3763250]

>>3763166
Better at shitting out garbage and convincing thirsty betas it's good, yes.

[Anonymous No.3763257]

>y-you're just jealous

[Anonymous No.3763366]

>>3763257
>/v/irgin consolewar memes
You're definitely jelly ass fuck.

[Anonymous No.3763380]

I am not even a sakimichan fan.

But I am tired of people whining. I will man up and say she is far better than me. And that's ok. I want to be as good as her one day.

I've yet to see a public hater of hers that isn't just jealous or her patreon. Or a beg jealous of her skill. Or both

Yes she exaggerates her anatomy to pander to her fans and yes she rushes her art to the point she makes obvious mistakes like extra fingers. Besides, we all make mistakes

Pointing 3 "mistakes" of hers art while you draw like a 12 year old ( not making this up) won't magically make you better than her.

She is still better than 90% of /IC She made it. She is great. Deal with it.

Why not instead of bitching about her anonymously you improve to get better than her? Just a thought.

Make it, and find your own fans that will pay you as much as hers. You will be happier for it. Wasting time trying to convince people a great artist is somehow bad won't make her any less succesful.

Let's be real, 90% of people that bitch about her would kill to be in her place. I know I would.

I for one will keep improving to be an awesome artist instead of wasting my time bitching.

(Guy in pic obviously jealous of sakimichan)

[Anonymous No.3763426]

>>3760905
Yeah...anatomically is bad, even for a frog and their eyes are too common (both girls)
I mean, she is doing the same as Drgraevling from deviantart

[Anonymous No.3763429]

>>3763426
still better than 90% of /ic

[Anonymous No.3763461]

>>3763429
Yeah, that´s the sad thing...what´s the purpose of /ic anons?

[Anonymous No.3763494]

>>3763461
You didn't realise that /ic/ is for failed artists who love to talk shit about other artists to feel good about their own shitty failed art?

[Anonymous No.3763554]

She ruined her face in the nsfw version

[Anonymous No.3763557]

>>3760862
Is sakimi chan suffering from same face syndrome?

[Anonymous No.3763708]

>>3763554
>tongue isn't long
REEEE

[Anonymous No.3763710]

[Anonymous No.3763778]

>>3760905
Kek

[Anonymous No.3763919]

>>3763778
Why do retards think flipping the image makes it look worse when you're not the one who painted it? The entire reason flipping does anything is because you get used to the image from looking at it for hours, it's not a fucking magic spell to see issues with images someone else made.

[Anonymous No.3763960]

>>3763919
In that case it does make it worse because seeing these knees, thighs and torsos in the way we're used to makes all the flaws more apparent.

[Anonymous No.3763963]

>>3760862
*thots

[Anonymous No.3763974]

>>3763960
no because the flaws already were apparent in the first place

[Anonymous No.3764125]

>>3760905
Looks sexy.

[Anonymous No.3764365]

>>3760862
there is nothing wrong with some warping or bending as long as it helps the intention of the painting.

showing the sexparts in proper position was more important to the artist than correct anatomy.

[Anonymous No.3765157]

>>3761878
Lmao post your work faggot. You sound like a NGMI crab. Stop being a jelly loser and draw.