[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 224 KB, 1200x1600, Picabia's Woman 01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3729074 No.3729074 [Reply] [Original]

Sorry I said a statement of obvious

>> No.3729076

>>3729074
That wasn't a statement it was a question, you dunce.

>> No.3729078

>>3729074
Oh look, it's that art student's work.

>> No.3729100

>>3729076
Just answer the question you silly rabbit

>> No.3729104

>>3729078
Hush puppy

>> No.3729196

I could never picture your style in a high end gallery. It’s very kitsch. Try a more refined realistic style. Learn anatomy and the elements then stylize. Very beginner tier.

>> No.3729204

>>3729196
A more refined realistic style?! That's for a kitsch gallery

No one can move around paint like I can

>> No.3729495

>>3729204

No wonder you are stagnant. You are too egotistical to progress.

>> No.3729497

>>3729074
this is looks like shit in a public toilet that some fat retarded fuckaroni left behind.

>> No.3729520

>>3729074
Not art. Not going to critique. Too kitsch.

>> No.3729522

very kitsch. I don't like it

>> No.3729612

>>3729497
No you are wrong

>>3729520
No you are wrong

>>3729522
No you are wrong

>> No.3729614

>>3729612
kitsch

>>3729612
kitsch

>>3729612
kitsch

>> No.3729644

>>3729612
not gonna lie it's sort of kitsch

>> No.3730512

Lmao that ear. Those colors. You sure know how to make them ugly.

>> No.3730516
File: 6 KB, 175x175, 453c20984ac28dbbb40fce47abd63ce6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3730516

>>3729074
Hair looks like it's from a Halloween mask.

>> No.3730522

This looks like that shitty urban art that's shilled in public schools. Crude, although not as crude as the "ethnic" painters they shill. Get better at anatomy and use finer strokes, and you'll be in business.

>> No.3730916

>>3729614
>>3729644
>>3730512
>>3730516
>>3730522
You guys know nothing. It just speaks volume that you refuse to recognize the great merits this painting has in aspiring to the style of Picabia. It shows how ignorant you are. 2 days ago I had semester review at my school where a professor I never met showered praises at me and asked me if I thought of myself as being gifted. I modestly said "little bit" and he said "well you definitely should know that you are very talented and be very proud of yourself" and that "not many people can do what you can do with paint". In particular he said the "Picabia painting" is beautiful and doesn't need to be discussed as much as other paintings that impressed him more but had minor flaws that needed to be fixed. There were two professors at the review and because the professor cannot recommend me to his own class himself the other professor did it for him. They said that starting off the day by looking and critiquing my art totally made their day. So there you go. My art is not for everyone. It takes a true soul with a moving heart and learned mind to appreciate my art.

Same can be said for illastrat's work which reminded my drawing professor of walter Robinson's art. He said illastrat's work was very strong.

You guys are in a bubble surrounded by delusions. I know what is the truth.

>> No.3730921

>>3730516
S/he's clearly wearing a skin suit

>> No.3730999

The colors are so unappealing

>> No.3731062

>>3730916
Lmao keep coping. Your professors are paid to blow smoke up your ass so you keep paying tuition. Good luck getting art like this anywhere NEAR a fucking established gallery. Your art is the literal definition of kitsch and your professors likely all have a good laugh about your work behind your back.

>> No.3731065

>>3731062
Sure in your deluded little head, that's what must be going on. But the professor asked me to be in his class and they don't shower praises unless the work is good. They have the highest standards and it's actually quite hard to impress them. That just shows that my work is actually good.

>> No.3731067

>>3731062
Some students even end up crying and breaking up in tears because the professors are terribly ruthless to students whose works are mediocre.

>> No.3731069

>>3731065
>>3731067
Hahahahahahaha god damn. I’m going to laugh so hard when you get out in the real world who aren’t paid to lick your balls (like literally everyone here who knows this work is kitsch trash)

>> No.3731073

OP is what happens when you’ve lived an entire life of being told you’re special

>> No.3731081

>>3730916
So if you have all the validation you need from people you trust, why do you try so hard to get approval here? Your art looks like shit and that's not going to change, regardless of how many excuses you have for it. If we're as ignorant as you say, why bother? Because you are a very insecure person and the comments here are getting to you. You are doubling down on trying to convince us that your art isn't ugly. We will obviously never get it, so take your toxicity and over-inflated ego elsewhere and leave this board.

>> No.3731082

>>3729074
Wow... She is very beautiful...
Can I buy this piece (or others) from you?

>> No.3731083
File: 2.09 MB, 1334x1334, 1B630C0A-D5BE-4743-B1D6-23EB3C3A0E83.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3731083

Yo r8 my latest portrait

>> No.3731091

>>3731081
>>3731082
>>3731083
Only two of these are new posts. Guess which one is chunbum samefagging?

>> No.3731093

>>3731091
>>3731083
Hi im the guy that made this, i havent read any of the thread what did I do worng?

>> No.3731094

>>3731091
You caught me. I'm
>>3731082 &
>>3730516
Lol

>> No.3731198

>>3731081
Your mean comments do nothing to me. That's what you want to believe, but no, I only care about truths. I don't really care about what kind of mean falsehood you can spout from your mouth, actually.

>>3731082
Yes but I don't think you have the money. It's one of my best recent works, and I plan to show it somewhere in the near future so I cant sell it for cheap

>> No.3731207

>>3729074
Is this a troll thread or are you actually that South Korean guy?

>> No.3731232
File: 49 KB, 420x480, default_Wallace_Wells.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3731232

I don't come onto /ic/ all that often but I recognise OP's art and the way she (you just know it's a she) talks.
Is this some long running gag you guys do or is this person being genuine?

>> No.3731517

>>3730916
You know when you come across a retard you act nice out of pity? That's what happened at your semester review.

>> No.3731527

>>3731517
False. The professor wanted me in his class next year.

>> No.3731902

>>3731232

It's not a she, it's a he. His name is Chunbum Park and he's a Korean. Just ignore him and his shit art.

>> No.3732160

>>3731902
Yes please do but it's too good to be ignored. Whether you like it or hate it the world has changed forever.

>> No.3732723
File: 319 KB, 1600x1600, Sin Saimdang 01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3732723

I am back with an epic painting!!

>> No.3732739

>>3732723
holy shit that's awful

>> No.3732816

>>3731902
Ah I see. My casual misogyny was in vain.

>> No.3732898
File: 36 KB, 511x250, chun-tranny.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3732898

>>3729074
the grandeur-ridden art student who paints himself as a woman

>> No.3732913

Why are the attention seekers on /ic/ all fine artists? Is it just one guy with DID?

>> No.3733159

>>3732913
the Ruan Jia cuck is the most cancerous attention whore and he's a digifag. can't really generalize on that.

>> No.3733177

>>3732739
You secretly like it

>> No.3733202

>>3733177
honestly, why would you even say that? it makes no sense. i know nobody, not even the most delusional narcissistic cunt, who argues that by some reverse-law, people say they hate a painting, but "secretly like it".
how old are you chunbun? you seem like a 17yr old who went to study art at a shit university a tard bit too soon. like, you must've dropped out of school and "followed your calling", which turned out to be painting yourself as trannies and manly cartoon women with Illastrat backgrounds.

>> No.3733229

>>3733202
No it's true. You secretly like it

>> No.3733287
File: 1.78 MB, 1312x1959, 37EEAA43-A082-4754-AB95-ED8FB0825CB6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3733287

The fact that chunbum so successfully trolls people here is hilarious.

>> No.3733289
File: 12 KB, 158x212, generative art.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3733289

>>3733229
i hate it to my guts and it angers me to look at your shit. is this your definition of "liking" something over there in chingchong land?

>> No.3733326

>>3733289
It's interesting how Asian languages don't actually sound like "ching chong" but English speakers imagine them to be the case. It just reflects poorly on your attitude that you make up sounds that don't exist but only in your sophisticated and elegant ching chong english head

>> No.3733342

>>3733326
>deflection
and i still hate your paintings by the way

>> No.3733354

>>3733342
Your mind thinks it hates my art.

But your soul is already in love with my art

>> No.3733367
File: 106 KB, 1200x794, davincisucks.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3733367

>>3733354
>you hate it
>that means you love it

>> No.3733383

>>3732913
I really think all the paint thinner fumes they inhale while painting messes with their head. The trad painter artists on this board are the worst posters by far.

>>3733159
I don't find the digiartists to be anywhere as annoying as the trad artists. My problem with the trad artists on this board are that so many of them are literally /beg/ level but because they use real paint, they think they are master artists. The only trad artist work I really like is Brian's.

If any of the intermediate level digi artists in the /draw/ or /porn/ or /las/ threads tried painting with real paint they would still create better paintings than these trad artists.

>> No.3733390

>>3733383
I agree but lol at the notion that digital artists could do shit traditionally. I’d love to see it.

>> No.3733508

>>3733383
You know nothing about fine art. You think van gogh was beginner. Experimentation to develop a personal style is the most important goal for a fine artist.

You think drawing realistic concept art shows the most skill and therefore the best. Your opinions are irrelevant in the artworld.

>> No.3733671

>>3733287
20 mins of painting, amending colours by mixing with black. Utter shit.

>> No.3733694

>>3733671
Nope it took me probably 5 days working 5 hours each day aka 25 hours to finish this painting

The colors mixed are complementary colors and triadic colors

>> No.3734243
File: 551 KB, 1102x734, ruan jia girl trad colors copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3734243

>>3733383
>If any of the intermediate level digi artists in the /draw/ or /porn/ or /las/ threads tried painting with real paint they would still create better paintings than these trad artists.
yeah i want to see how that would turn out! really!

you honestly believe that some wacom ctrl+Z bitch would produce anything worthwhile in traditional media? the two have nothing to do with one another.
pic related is a "real painting" by Ruan Jia. The colors are muddy, smudgy and the hair looks like some fucking seaweed helmet. additionally, there are like two ingrown hair strains near her collar bones. not even your "industry standard" master Ruan Jia can manage traditional.
"Where's the ctrl + Z? How can I create another layer? How do I zoom in with this shit?"

I like you "what if" argument, as it makes the thinnest, most ridiculous claim in here

>> No.3734265

>>3733694
Do you paint with your mouth then, as that would explain a lot.

>> No.3734368
File: 1.06 MB, 1258x1599, 013ad508f7c2a300e4ffadbfc341c608.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3734368

>>3734243
I hope this is bait. that painting is better than 95% of IC and it doesn't matter if you work digital or traditional, it just comes down to being able to draw/visualize your idea. Stop giving the medium so much importance.

Do you think this painting is better just because its trad?

>> No.3734522

Chunbum is proof that asians have no soul.

Merry Christmas everybody else.

>> No.3734523

>>3734368
The Ruan Jia painting is probably better than 99.9%, not 95%, also that garbage you posted is definitely a good example as to why the medium isn't all that important, >>3734243
is fucking retarded.
Personally I find traditional easier in a lot of aspects, digital has other advantages though.

>> No.3734547

>>3734368
>argument is that digital artist are in no way automatically good at traditional
>shows a shit trad painting
>asks "Do you think this painting is better just because its trad?"
wow, such logic! much connection!

>> No.3734625

>>3734522
Amen brother, Happy Christmas.

>> No.3734643

>>3729074
>>3729100
>>3729204
>>3730916
Why are you RPing as a dunning kruger?

>> No.3734669

>>3734643
My art is actually good that's why

>> No.3735459

>>3734523
>The Ruan Jia painting is probably better than 99.9%
The Ruan Jia painting is literally shit spread on a canvas judged by the standards of painting. Even as academic painting, his heavily concept art influenced approach is stale, with an upfront boring composition, a run-off-the-mill fashion magazine blank stare, muddy, greenish colors and it really aptly shows how he is completely taken up by the digitial work flow.
All of a sudden, he is confronted with real brushes, real colors that don't react like your "multiply layering" technique, where you can't easily overpaint an area with your fancy preset "brushes".

Basically, the entire digital workflow is one big euphemism and caricature of traditional painting. digital brushes have absolutely no connection to handling a real brush. It shows the audacity of concept artists, trying to roam in a different area where none of their rules apply anymore and at the same time, it also defaces everyone who is jumping to defend digifags who claim that by some miracle they are "able to work in traditional at any time, better than any real traditional artist".

Neither digital or traditional media are better or worse than one another. It's what you can and can't do with it. A concept artist who specializes in visualizations for gaming scenarios and character design wants a totally different result than a fine artist who works e.g. on the brink of figurative to abstract depictions. The two do not compare or compete at all. But here you have your standard anime faggots, judging models by how thicc they are rendered, unironically believing that anime is the pinnacle of art these days, shitting on DaVinci sketches for being "old and dusty" and "any anime artist could do it better these days". Absolutely no sense of perspective and awareness for history to be found in these little zika virus anime kids on here.

>> No.3735915
File: 332 KB, 1600x1600, Sin Saimdang 05.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3735915

Revised

>> No.3736038

>>3734547
if you got an IQ above using "such wow" memes in 2018, then yes it makes sense. Try looking the posts over again, and you might find the answers you seek.

>> No.3736043

>>3729074
You suck chunbum . merry Christmas.

>> No.3736148

Never thought I'd see someone worse than Illustrat and also manages to shit post at his level, but here we are

>> No.3736173

>>3735915
congrats, it's still shit

>> No.3736578

>>3729074
those clouds made me spit out my water a bit, fuck you

>> No.3736584

>>3734243
>he draws in more than one layer

>> No.3736743
File: 440 KB, 1600x1600, Sin Saimdang 06.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3736743

Revised again

>> No.3736844

Dont draw white women if you not white, chinkybum

>> No.3737033

>>3736844
1. Use correct grammar you dotard
2. Don't tell me an artist what to do
3. Stop drawing anime

It's okay to draw Asian as Asian and white as white.
It's wrong to draw Asian with white features then call him or her Asian like in most anime.

So stop drawing anime, you narutard

>> No.3737039
File: 267 KB, 1600x1600, Sin Saimdang 07 (1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3737039

Revised last time

>> No.3737046

>>3737039
You're so close yet so far. Your best paintings are the ones that depict a scene

>> No.3737056

>>3729074
Public mural art.

>> No.3737069

>>3737056
>implying publicly and privately funded murals aren't a staple of fine arts income and exposure

>> No.3737072

>>3737046
Thanks. That might be true. This doesn't have a narrative.

>>3737056
Thanks. I would love to do a mural one day.

>>3737069
Yup

>> No.3737122

>>3737033
Youre not white stop drawing white people
>>3729074 youull never be blond white aryan chongbum do i need to say anything else omg :x

>> No.3737129

>>3737122
You are not colored so stop telling colored people what to do. You will never be colored. You are fat lazy redneck with flaky skin and trump's orange hair.

I don't want to be white. I am perfectly proud of being Asian. Stop assuming things about other people. Your assumptions are wrong.

I am probably taller than you and have younger skin so... go talk to someone else

>> No.3737141

>>3737129
>stop assuming things about other people
you are insufferable and ironic, im only asking you to shred this painting >>3729074 its just WRONG for YOU to draw WHITE women ::::

>> No.3737143
File: 1.54 MB, 2447x2550, IMG_3180.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3737143

>>3737141
I'm white and I draw black women

>> No.3737167

>>3737143
so youre as wrong and retarded as stinkychinky whats new brian

>> No.3737169
File: 979 KB, 3264x2448, IMG_3223.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3737169

>>3737167
Here's a hand I just drew

>> No.3737172

>>3737141
It's not wrong. You are wrong, idiot

>> No.3737185

>>3737172
:shrugs: i guess im an idiot now :shrugs:::::

>> No.3737210

>>3737185
Yeah you are.

>> No.3737213

>>3737143
Brian you are one of most talented artists here. You me and illastrat are the only guys with actual talent here

>> No.3737245

>>3737213
Half of this is true

>> No.3737356

>>3737245
No all of it is true. Don't stomp on other trad artists just because you see us as competition

>> No.3737574
File: 695 KB, 1075x1600, Kyla I 04.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3737574

Revised