[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 535 KB, 1314x856, https___www.latimes.com_local_educ.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3721595 No.3721595 [Reply] [Original]

Should we speak out against racist art?

>> No.3721598

>>3721595
A thread died because of you. Most likely a shit thread, but still.

Fuck off
SAGE

>> No.3721614

>>3721595
If the district has come together and decided they no longer wish to have this mural on their school, then whatever.

Whether or not you want to complain about their dumb reasoning is one thing, but ultimately their decision is an expression of their ideological beliefs protected by free speech, and they are free to remove it if they want. It's their mural - not yours. Why should anyone else give a fuck?

>> No.3721617

>>3721595
Is that the Big Brother house

>> No.3721631

>>3721595
Murals are degenerate and should be outlawed.

>> No.3721661

I think there should be a dialogue instead of an outing. To further clarify, individual eccentricities of opinion are not the same as state segregation.

>> No.3721666

>>3721595
no
drawings don't hurt people
/thread

>> No.3721700

>>3721631
This.

>> No.3721713

>>we

>> No.3721817
File: 427 KB, 850x755, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
3721817

Your question is bumfuck retarded considering where we are. No actual artist with a brain wants society or the law to control what they’re allowed to create.
If you’re an artist who wants censorship, you’re just begging for a permanent boot-to-face existence, at which point I don’t know why you don’t just kys.
Sage and fuck off.

>> No.3721967

>>3721595
Yes. If anyone should rally against freedom of expression, it should be artists.