Good Art Thread

[35yoboomer No.3707428]

Let's enliven /ic/, there's too much degeneracy happening (firezfags, mangafags, pornfags, digitalfags, prokofags, you name it). Post good art examples.

[Anonymous No.3707439]

>>3707428
there is no good art here anon, on /ic/everything is terrible.

[Anonymous No.3707458]

>>3707428

joel corcia

animation concepts / backgrounds

[Anonymous No.3707459]

>>3707458

[Anonymous No.3707469]

[Anonymous No.3707788]

[Anonymous No.3707792]

[Anonymous No.3707794]

[Anonymous No.3707797]

[Anonymous No.3707804]

This one actually has a description of what's supposed to be happening in the scene, and it is way more prosaic than you'd think

[Anonymous No.3707806]

[Anonymous No.3707808]

[Anonymous No.3707809]

[Anonymous No.3707841]

etel andan

[Anonymous No.3707845]

>>3707841
typo, i meant ADNAN


also here's Sidney Nolan

[Anonymous No.3707846]

>>3707841
typo, i meant ADNAN


also here's Sidney Nolan

[Anonymous No.3707867]

>>3707428
But that art is bad. Its full of tangents and it has no variety. Its boring and monotonous.

[35yoboomer No.3707900]

>>3707867
I can give you some hints if you can't see anything. Actually, there are a lot of things happening on that picture, you'll be amazed.
The hint: look at the lines.

[Anonymous No.3707903]

>>3707841
Ook Ook me smart me paint like a 5 year old
yummie yummie gimme artworld's fabricated respect

[Anonymous No.3707910]

>>3707900
Not him but are you memeing? This isn't one of those "more than meets the eye" things, it really is just a quick pen doodle of some fruit. I guarantee the artist himself didn't think much of it unless he's very arrogant.

[Anonymous No.3707913]

>>3707794
>>3707797
>>3707804
>>3707806


Did you get these from /beg/? This stuff is far from being professional.

[Anonymous No.3707918]

This threads off to a terrible start, jesus.

[35yoboomer No.3707919]

>>3707910
Actually, I'm quite serious. If you're curious (and I'm sure you are since you asked), invest some time in studying this picture.

[Anonymous No.3707930]

>>3707919
I didn't post it. Tell me what you like about it instead of shifting the responsibility to me. About all I can say for it is that the lines are clean which makes sense, it's just small circles with frequent plane changes, and it does resemble fruit. But is that low bar our standard for "good"?

[35yoboomer No.3707940]

>>3707930
Tomorrow.
And always remember that when you try to generate your own answer (before the answer is given) instead of being spoon-fed, you unironically learn better.

[Anonymous No.3707950]

>>3707918
tf is that shit, so last century

[Anonymous No.3707995]

[Anonymous No.3708052]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aGyAZNyic_I

[Anonymous No.3708054]

[Anonymous No.3708056]

[Anonymous No.3708057]

[Anonymous No.3708059]

[Anonymous No.3708472]

[35yoboomer No.3708725]

>>3707867
>>3707910
>>3707930

[Anonymous No.3708727]

>>3708725
Not those guys, but i'm not sure I understand. Could you explain?

[Anonymous No.3708728]

tfw u can't even draw some fruit without Perspective-sama anal raping your ass.

[35yoboomer No.3708739]

>>3708727
No prob.
1 - represents that an artist should not copy an object, but present his own idea about the object: that what matters, not the "realistic" depiction of the object; the object itself doesn't matter as well.
Speaking of problem-solving, How to represent a 3d-shape with such a simple one line contour as in OP (apart from placing one behind the other)? Give a touch of a cuboid, for instance, it will definitely help to emphasize the planes. That's a brilliant idea.

[Anonymous No.3708741]

>>3708725
lmfao what

[35yoboomer No.3708750]

>>3708727
2 and 3 - shows that there must be the balance between THE ORDER (a system of lines, a grid, relationships between these lines; composition, in one word) and THE CHAOS (the grid is not perfectly straight, equal, symmetrical, etc., some parts or objects should fall out of the grid, etc.)
The system of lines (the grid) helps to minimize the directions of lines that a viewer will perceive. In reality the number of directional lines is huge, even infinite, but good artists always lessen this number (recall the previous post; as we said in 1, the objects and reality don't matter, the artist's ideas do).

[35yoboomer No.3708757]

>>3708727
4 - shows that there always must be a flow, there can be several of flowing organic lines (like in gesture drawing); I've depicted three flowing lines (as 3d solids, actually) there are more. Also, there are 2D flowing lines, but they were too obvious to emphasize.

[Anonymous No.3708761]

[Anonymous No.3708762]

Just 'cause it's technically good doesn't mean it's not shit.

That's why people can still hate Michelangelo, Da Vinci, and the rest of the ninja turtles.

[35yoboomer No.3708772]

>>3708762
Absolutely. But I've found that judging (what is shit and what is not) doesn't help to become better in any creative field. But trying to understand what I can take from any presented piece (of art, music, etc.) and implement in my practice really helps.

[Anonymous No.3708775]

>>3708772
It sure doesn't, just wanted to shout into the streets about how not all well-made art is necessarily good.
No need to acknowledge me, though I appreciate your insight and comments, anon.:]

[35yoboomer No.3708789]

>>3708775
You are welcome, anon!