Do you get Consent?

[Anonymous No.3668661]

[Anonymous No.3668682]

>>3668661
>you have to have consent to feel the form now
>tfw no form
Just don't call this your grave, this is the future you chose.

[Anonymous No.3668874]

>>3668661
>create character
>draw her getting raped constantly and explicitly stated that she is not consenting
>encourage friends to draw rape fanart of the character

[Anonymous No.3668904]

>>3668874
>tfw I like to think of my characters as my sons and daughters
>tfw I'm the autistic god of my own fictional world
I don't get how people can do OCs and lewd them. To each their own for sure, but still.

[Anonymous No.3668914]

>>3668904
Getting too attached to your own OCs is creepy, anon

[Anonymous No.3668924]

>>3668661
>all of my drawings are just porn of a fictional character
>he's not even my character
Feels weird man

[Anonymous No.3668931]

>>3668661
Fictional means that it isn't real anon.

[Anonymous No.3668939]

>>3668931
Doesn't necessarily mean consent from the character. What about consent from the creator?

[Anonymous No.3668940]

>>3668914
Maybe, but I guess is fine as long as you don't make a big deal out of it.
If I ever get popular (let an anon dream okay) I'd not care if people made lewds of them or something.
>>3668939
Y-yeah... Yeah not like this guy. Yikes.

[Anonymous No.3668954]

>>3668939
people are fucking wild

[Anonymous No.3668970]

[Anonymous No.3668971]

>>3668939
This is the reason for >>3668914
But really, Robbi's just a massive virtue signaling cuck.

[Anonymous No.3669342]

>>3668661

What is this implying?

[Anonymous No.3669344]

>>3668954
That's the daily life of Scandinavians, not even joking.

[Anonymous No.3669349]

>>3668661
I've recently started seeing characters as math formulas. a certain list of characteristics make a character, and using them to create said character is like using a formula

OP pic is basically saying math formulas need to give their consent before being applied in a calculation

[Anonymous No.3669553]

>>3669342
That the left has completely lost their marbles.

[Anonymous No.3669572]

>>3668939

This is the same fag who sent a pic of his spread asshole to EVS on twitter. Reall class act.

[Anonymous No.3669585]

>>3668904
> make OCs and be the God of your fictional world
> forbid OCs to get lewd
Isn't that every religion, even in the real world?

[Anonymous No.3669588]

>>3668661
did your sandy vagoo get consent to be fingered by your greasy sausage fingers?

[Anonymous No.3669589]

>>3669349
That might be simplistic.
Characters are sort of by definition vehicles for people to relate/love/project.

No one makes math formulas their waifus.

[Anonymous No.3669606]

>>3668661
>consent
Its a fucking drawing.

[Anonymous No.3669607]

>>3668939
this is fucking embarrassing.

[Anonymous No.3669610]

>>3668939
I think I'm lacking context to understand this.
Can anyone brief me on this?

[Anonymous No.3669614]

>>3668939
>your

[Anonymous No.3669631]

>>3669610
Robbi was the one who redesigned Gwen Stacy into Spider-Gwen, but he thinks of her as his own unique Original Creation™.
Then Frank Cho draws this, so Robbi gets mad.

[Anonymous No.3669635]

>>3669631
Thank you fr explaining.
Well that's stupid. Especialy in the mainstream comic industry, you don't own the characters you draw and design.
Also this pic isn't dirty. It's a very standard Spider-man pose... it's just double standard, I guess.

[Anonymous No.3669675]

>>3669631
he made it a lot less interesting than the original sexy spider person drawing. there was a sort of hyper extended look to the pose that made it much more fleshy and sexual, along with the rendering.

[Anonymous No.3669687]

Frank Cho is #based but his art is completely unappealing and stiff.

[Anonymous No.3669691]

>>3669687

How the fuck is his art stiff?

[Anonymous No.3669704]

>>3669691
compare

[Anonymous No.3669724]

>>3669704
I'll take the Cho one over the Manara any time.

[Anonymous No.3669730]

>>3669724
someone has to be boring i guess

[Anonymous No.3669735]

>>3669730
I just like my women without broken necks. And the face disturbs me, more than usual Manara works.
Also the pic is clearly composed to have her ass as a focal point, and the logo hides it, which is stupid, but not the artist's fault.

[Anonymous No.3669782]

>>3669735
shes supposed to be disturbing, sort of like a flying lizard, because she's a creepy spider lady

[Anonymous No.3669787]

>>3669782
So you're saying that the anatomy is broken on purpose? That's basicaly a "muh style" claim.
Anyway it lands her right into the uncanny valley, which Cho avoids by being more cartoony (and less absurd with the angle of gwen's head)

[Anonymous No.3669807]

>>3668970
sauce?

[Anonymous No.3669815]

>>3669787
yes essentially
people were distracted by the ass thing but the central conceit of the picture is actually the 'creepy crawly' pose

[Anonymous No.3669817]

>>3668904
I recently started to lewd one of my OCs for the first time and that felt strangely good. Like if it matured in some way.

[Anonymous No.3669819]

>>3669815
also i found this, which is funny

[Anonymous No.3669820]

>>3669724
take your shit taste away from here

[Anonymous No.3669822]

>>3668661
GODDAM /POL/, GET OUT OF MY BOARD.
Go talk about your fagget politics to your ecochambers. Stop filling /ic/ with this 2016 bullshit.

>Urr durr durr, aren't SJWs crazy guys? Please confirm my opinions

[Anonymous No.3669842]

>>3669822
if 'just ignore the crazies and they'll go away' worked I'd be with you. as it stands, ridiculing ridiculous shit is preferable to tolerating meme-tier opinions allowing them to become implicit shared progressive values that no one who wants to work in the industry can openly oppose.

[Anonymous No.3669854]

>>3669815
I get your point, really, but I fail to see the creepy crawly thing in it.
The pose is such a classic spider-man stock pose that it doesn't feels creepy to me, just...Spider-many.

>>3669820
Oh no, someone with a different opinion, we can't tolerate that! I'm not even saying that the Manara pic is bad, I'm just saying that I prefer Cho's.

[Anonymous No.3669908]

>>3669842
>Oh, i'm changing the industry by making 4chan threads
You are reddit fags that like to repeat the same tired memes to one another. And it would be okay if you made one thread and stayed in it, but you feel the need to repeat the same thread over and over, across every board you faggots find. Parroting the same shit out of 2016 and thinking you are being funny.
You are a cancer.

[Anonymous No.3669936]

>>3669822
>>3669842
You two are outside of your safespaces right now, go back before your fee-fee's get triggered and you literally won't stop shaking.

[Anonymous No.3669938]

>>3669936
reading comprehension

[Anonymous No.3669962]

>>3669585
>forbid OCs to get lewd
I mean I don't absolutely forbid them to get lewd, there's a lot of sexualized designs I love out there and I'd like to make such characters sometime (when I get better actually, I'm still not that good at doing bodies...). So that'd be some degree of lewd, I think. I'm just not really into porn.
>>3669817
Did it? I'm glad anon. Keep up doing whatever makes you feeling like doing art and drawing your own characters.

[Anonymous No.3670007]

>>3668661
I do not. In fact, if people post their oc's here, I tend to draw porn of them. it gives me a little rush, especially when they respond to it angrily or try to ignore it

[Anonymous No.3670211]

>>3668661

[Anonymous No.3670223]

>>3669936
Thanks for prooving my point, tard.
Literal NPC that just repeats the same 5 memes to anything.

[Anonymous No.3670250]

>>3668939
>make half assed uninspired amalgam of existing characters
>act like you’ve created something profound

Modern comics are pretty much 2010 tumblr. Sad.

[Anonymous No.3670297]

>>3668661
I preffer struggle snugle in my art

[Anonymous No.3670304]

>>3669585
"Multiply and reproduce" or something like this is in Religion

[Anonymous No.3670333]

>>3669585
I prefer the Greek tradition of storytelling, where humanity is the plaything of the gods
remember kids, 'it's not rape if she's a lower-order being'

[Anonymous No.3671414]

>>3668904
post your work and i will lewd them

[Anonymous No.3671830]

>>3668661

Fun fact there's literally a group of people in some /aco/ threads defending this.

[Anonymous No.3673847]

>>3668661
Still not as dumb as when I saw someone say r63 art is transphobic

[Anonymous No.3673965]

>>3669589
>No one makes math formulas their waifus.
talk for yourself