/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.3640113]

>anime can't be realist-

[Anonymous No.3640120]

>>3640113
>this really looks grea-

[Anonymous No.3640124]

>over-rendered and muddy

[Anonymous No.3640127]

>>3640113
so you mean its realistic because half of it is realistic color palette and the other half is anime face? i dont get ur point. Also was there ever a point in amking anime realistic? Isnt main reason its simple so you can animate it quicker?

[Anonymous No.3640128]

>>3640113
If you think that looks realistic then you need to get your eyes checked. More detailed than animu usually is? Sure. Realistic? Nah.

[Anonymous No.3640132]

>>3640113
the mechanical part feel odd on the girl

[Anonymous No.3640136]

>>3640132
The tail? Yeah it should be on the girl but in the girl. And yeah, I wish I was that tail.

[Anonymous No.3640143]

>>3640113
>Proportions are gre-

[Anonymous No.3640152]

>>3640113
i sure do love my overcomplicated mech designs instead of aesthetic design choices and functionality :)

[Anonymous No.3640173]

>>3640113
I like the cat-ear lasers. Would enter combat with that setup.

[Anonymous No.3640188]

Retard only the foot is realistic

[Anonymous No.3640194]

>>3640113
At some point it cannot. For instance that is starting to look uncanny

[Anonymous No.3640196]

>>3640173
>cat-ear
the fuck i thought it was the mask when it is open

[Anonymous No.3640212]

Why would you want it to be realistic? Anime looks great as a stylization form

[Anonymous No.3640218]

>>3640113
ugh, the artist ruined it with the baby face.

I maybe if he rendered the rest of the body like he did the feet, it would be nice.

[Anonymous No.3640221]

>>3640113
>adult bottom half
>tiny child top half
it looks like a human centipede

[Anonymous No.3640230]

This person has no fucking idea how the pelvis connects to the legs.

[Anonymous No.3640236]

>>3640230
redline it

[Anonymous No.3640243]

this is creepy af, maybe it would have worked with a semi-realistic manga style but not this cartoony

[Anonymous No.3640692]

>>3640113
Her fucking spine is being snapped in two holy shit

[Anonymous No.3640694]

>>3640692
retard

[Anonymous No.3640695]

>>3640113
kys

[Anonymous No.3640703]

>>3640694
nigga do you have eyes?

[Anonymous No.3640704]

>>3640113
yikes

[Anonymous No.3640706]

>>3640692
>he can't pose like this
Ngmi

[Anonymous No.3640710]

>>3640706

[Anonymous No.3640720]

>>3640230
redline it bro

[Anonymous No.3640721]

what are this artist's secrets?

[Anonymous No.3640783]

>>3640721
cgi

[Anonymous No.3640895]

>>3640113
That looks horrible.
Shit rendering.
Bad anatomy, okay, that's anime for you. But there's so much conflict and disparity. Do what you want to do, don't make a composite of a dozen. It's incoherent.

[Anonymous No.3640901]

>anime can't be realist-

[Anonymous No.3640909]

>>3640901
disgusting desu

[Anonymous No.3640914]

>>3640901
I hate the subject matter but the rendering is so nice.

[Anonymous No.3640923]

>>3640914
you should check his normal illustrations

[Anonymous No.3640925]

>>3640901
lmao even the bird enjoy the it

[Anonymous No.3640985]

>>3640901
this isn't even that bad. artist?

[Anonymous No.3640987]

>>3640721
>turns photo into painting

how did he do it

[Anonymous No.3641042]

Her face still looks like moe garbage. Dropped.

[Anonymous No.3641044]

>>3640113
OK this is going TOO far.

[Anonymous No.3641049]

>>3640901
I would literally call this CP except no human is being exploited so it's the MOST ethically questionable possible content.

[Anonymous No.3641072]

>>3641049
They're dolls. In context. But you can buy loli dolls for sex IRL.

[Anonymous No.3641098]

>>3640113
>anime can't be realist-

[Anonymous No.3641101]

This is obviously painted over a photo.

[Anonymous No.3641277]

>>3640113
her arms look so short

[Anonymous No.3641287]

>>3641049
>>3641072
You keep telling yourselves that. Next you'll say that you were honored to be inducted as a part of the Legion Scroll of Triumph, or as normal people call it, the Sex Offender Registry.

[Anonymous No.3641288]

>>3641049
>"Th-they're just dolls, officer!! I picked mine up from the Harvester Factory a few blocks from here!"
>"You mean Casseder Heights Middle School?"
>"YES! No wait..."

[Anonymous No.3641344]

>>3641049
>>3641287
Can we cease with the "LOLI IS CP" sperg bait, its been tired for years now and nobody cares

[Anonymous No.3641373]

>>3640113
idk that kinda looks disturbing

[Anonymous No.3641415]

>>3641098
I always hate that Sakimichans rendering is so.... shiny and soft.

[Anonymous No.3641421]

>>3641344
Don't give him you and watch samefaging fest. It's great.

[Anonymous No.3642134]

>>3640113

I don't get it. How is this possible? The person that drew that has a very limited knowledge regarding anatomy and proportion. The upper torso is completely fucked., the way the spine is bent, the tiny and short ass arms and hands, the gigantic head. The torso seems to be in a neutral perspective but the lower body looks like it is in a different plain, a different dimension.

It's all fucked and yet, that guy is already trying to render realistically.
Should painting and render be something you learn after you master anatomy? Why are new age artists so obsessed to jump into shading before they know how to properly draw?

I can do better than this and even I think I'm too newbie with anatomy to try to render

[Anonymous No.3642141]

>>3642134
>I can do better than this
Obligation pyw faggot

[Anonymous No.3642148]

>>3642141

The most recent shit I did.

[Anonymous No.3642161]

>>3642134
He knows what the people really care about.

An untrained normie doesnt really see such faults but appreciates the good render. Why do you think Sakimi gets praised to high heacen by the normies? Because they dont know enogh to see the problems with her works.

[Anonymous No.3642162]

>>3641098
>this isn't anime, nor is realistic

phew

[Anonymous No.3642165]

>>3642148
that's very stiff, even when traced

[Anonymous No.3642166]

>>3640113
dude photobashed a real torso and put a cartoon upperbody wtf hahahahahaha

[Anonymous No.3642168]

>>3640113
the yellow makes it look like she has foot fungus lol

[Anonymous No.3642176]

>>3642161

normies only care about pornographic content, even if it is average quality, a highly, exaggerated render can hide a lot of imperfections and distract the person that is looking at the drawing.
I bet if you only saw the linework of most of those drawings, shit would look awful

[Anonymous No.3642183]

>>3642161
>An untrained normie
Hahahahaha the fucking cope. Why would a normie need to be "trained?" They're consumers. As an artist, your goal is to get more consumers than the other artist. They don't need to be "trained," YOU need to give them what they want or else stop complaining that no one likes your art.

[Anonymous No.3642200]

>>3642148
>trash tier proportions, doesn't understand perspective
>garbage tier anatomy

fucking kek

[Anonymous No.3642214]

Feet are put of persprctive and the level of detail isnt on the thighs

[Anonymous No.3642245]

>>3642183
Anon, that sounds like what a pimp would say.

[Anonymous No.3642258]

>>3640703
Have you ever heard of exaggerating certain parts of the anatomy to the artists liking you literal baboon

[Anonymous No.3642276]

>>3640113
girls like lauren mayberry exist. They are just real life anime girls.

[Anonymous No.3642277]

>>3642134
you know that on average asians have longer torso and shorter limbs adaptation for a sedentary lifestyle which require less walking, right? and this makes their spine more flexible simply by having longer length to work with

also less protruding noses and thicker skin with more fat underneath which are responsible for less wrinkles and less skull structure to be seen, making the face look younger. which also explain why the asian culture finds youngish features handsome, because that's what they have, explains a lot of stylistic decisions such as defining the nose less, both frontal and side view, sometimes even drawing everything from the tip of the nose to the tip of the chin as a straight continuous line, and also explains why a lot of asian artists are bad at drawing old and / or bony faces

[Anonymous No.3642333]

>>3642200

Well, I'm working on my anatomy. I started working on it more recently so I still have a lot to learn and master. But at least i'm starting with the basics instead of jumping to rendering.

[Anonymous No.3642337]

>>3642277

Not at all applicable. You can justify those proportions with different types of bodies. Unless the figure in OP's picture suffers from some sort of physical deformities, even people with different types of bodies follow a proportion ration. You won't see a person with such smaller torso compared with his/hers lower body. No person has such short arms and tiny hands compared with the rest of the body, including hand.

Now, you can talk about stylization. And that is an acceptable excuse. But if that is the case, the illustration still feels odd with a realistic rendering and realistic body parts (feet for example) and then a out of place, weirdly drawn upper torso and head.

I doubt the artist intention was to make an abstract painting.

[Anonymous No.3642345]

>>3642333
>>3642148
This is high /beg/ tier stuff and it's also unappealing. Post a painting and you'll fail even harder.

Also what's this muh honorabru artists don't paint & render before they master anatomy mentality? Is this autism what happens to people who come to /ic/ too early in their development?

[Anonymous No.3642348]

>>3642333

lol the OP picture is 100x better than the trash you draw. Don’t even bother with anatomy when you can’t even handle proportations.

[Anonymous No.3642349]

>>3642345

I guess I am autistic then and never knew about it. I mean, people do say autism spectrum is wide.
Who knows. Maybe /ic/ is filled with autistic people and they don't know >>3642345

[Anonymous No.3642352]

>>3642348

*proportions

[Anonymous No.3642355]

>>3642345
How bout you post your work

[Anonymous No.3642378]

>>3640113
Regular anime drawing with feet copied from a photo.

[Anonymous No.3642401]

>>3642333
But you said you could do better than the op
You can't

[Anonymous No.3642416]

>>3642401

I think i can do a better job than OP.
I sure wouldn't do the mistakes OP did regarding the how the body was drawn

If my drawing skills are shit, then i don't know what to say about OP's pic. I'm a shit artist and even I can see big issues with the picture posted.
The only thing good about that pic are the feet which are probably just a photo heavily edited, not a drawing or a render job from the artist.

[Anonymous No.3642423]

>>3642345
/beg/ here, I thought you aren't supposed to touch painting until you got all your fundamentals down, was that a meme?

[Anonymous No.3642457]

>>3642423
"Getting your fundamentals down" can mean almost anything, from "leave /beg/" to tens of thousands of hours until mastery sometime late in your life or never. It's a dangerous limitation to set on yourself and will probably make you hate everything. Waiting a bit with more complex things like painting isn't wrong if you find them overwhelming, but in the end it's up to you to express yourself and have fun. If you want to paint, do it. Don't turn into one of those guys who sob on /ic/ about how they can't paint because they put this autismal limiter on themselves and now they've created a negative feedback loop so they're never ever going to paint in their lives.

Lots of anons suffer from YOU CAN'T DO x UNTIL YOU DO y. You can do whatever the fuck you want and you'll be okay as long as you have intrinsic motivation to apply stronger and stronger fundamentals to whatever you do, be it apples on tables or anime cat girl stuff like op

[Anonymous No.3642466]

>>3642457

This post is so wrong, it just makes it extra funny because of how you project yourself as being an art expert and connoisseur. If you want to be a well versatile, good artist you need the fundamentals. Even if you are going to do more abstract work, you need fundamentals. Anatomy, composition, know how light works, shading, construction of a painting.

Picasso painted abstract art, cubism. He applied unique techniques. He also learned the fundamentals and mastered them.
Trying to do complex perspectives, highly rendered paintings is like trying to drive a F1 car without having a driving license.
You can learn to drive an F1 car without it, but it isn't very recommended

[Anonymous No.3642480]

>>3642466
I’m not that anon, but what are you even responding to? That anon basically said, as he literally summed up in his last paragraph, that you don’t have to wait until x to do y as long as you keep practicing and applying stronger fundamentals.

Your autistic post makes it seem like he said IGNORE THE FUNDAMENTALS! Are you an NPC with a broken script? Otherwise, I don’t see how sperging out over MUH FUNDIES applies here.

[Anonymous No.3642489]

>>3642480

>are you an NPC?

Why do people still use this term? Is what you are seeing in reddit and then spewing it like a sperg on social media and friends like it is a smart word to use on others?
Fucking "NPC"? Are you a 12 year old retard? Do you laugh at knuckles uganda jokes too?
I don't even know what that is suppose to mean. Are you calling me a drone? A sheep? NPC? Who would use that shit unironic? Go fuck edit your "gamers rise" edgy pics to post on your facebook groups like the fucking child you are.

[Anonymous No.3642497]

>>3642489
I’m calling you a moron with bad reading comprehension. Sorry for the confusion, moron. Lurk more.

[Anonymous No.3642501]

>>3642497

>lurk more
I'm surprised you didn't type it as "moar" since you are trying so hard to fit in and use cringy lingo you think people still use in this imageboard.

[Anonymous No.3642504]

>>3642489
>tired of memes
>literally parrots the most generic FUNDIES ONLY, EVEN PICASSO EVEN KNEW REALISM /ic/ schlock without a hint of irony
Stop posting

[Anonymous No.3642506]

>>3642466
He didn't deny that though. The point is "How much skill counts as having your fundamentals down?". Some drawings obviously need that on /beg/, but sometimes even outside it you see artists creating art better than 90% of /ic/ like Sakimichan and they're still told they don't have fundamentals. I mean, I hate Saki's art and I can see the problems, but you get my point.

Fundamentals to me is simply knowing that you can't ignore light and shadows, being able to rotate stuff, and that there is a body under clothes. Anyone who draws applying those principles already has fundamentals to me, even if they need to be improved.

[Anonymous No.3642508]

>>3642501
It’s okay, moron. Next time, simply read the entire post before making your own autistic essay about the post you didn’t read. It’s that simple.

[Anonymous No.3642516]

>>3642508

Thank you for the tip. Maybe next time I won't act like a... what you kids say now? NPC?
Yeah, I won't act like a NPC.
GAMERS RISE UP xD

[Anonymous No.3642602]

>>3642134
Did it ever cross your mind that perhaps she is not meant to follow human anatomy?

[Anonymous No.3642625]

>>3642148
dont listen to these spergs, your lineart is gorgeous

[Anonymous No.3642649]

>>3640901
this is great

[Anonymous No.3642660]

>>3642516
you sound upset

[Anonymous No.3642910]

>>3642134
What does rendering have anything to do with anatomy? You're just like the fags they say you need to know anatomy JUST to animate right. No, you need that for structure; defined characters. It's not mandatory just to have it, like rendering. All rendering is is just illusions of what looks like irl. Bot many things exist irl that doesn't fit standard norm, based on our definition.

It's only wrong based on what you rather have "right". But to most, that's not important, just like having "Perfectly drawn frames" in an animation, because the important factor is seeing the motion, hence being a animation.

TL;DR: There is no order, just appeal. What people look for is what matters.

[Anonymous No.3643123]

>>3642910

I'm assuming a person that is rendering is also doing the linework. If you are going to render a human figure, you are also going to draw it, and if you are going to draw a human figure I think you need to have the basics regarding anatomy, perspective and proportions.
And yes, you need to learn how to draw if you want to do animation.Unless you are doing cut out animation,

Rendering is something you should learn after you have the fundamentals, if you are drawing human figures, animals, mechanical objects like cars, or just backgrounds. Knowing perspective, knowing scale. Even the simple act of training your lines, doing the typical "draw this curve like 100 times per day" stuff is important.
At least that's what I believe and what I hear a lot of people, people that are quite good at what they do, usually say and I agree and that mindset is what I'm following know.

Besides, why jump important processes? Wouldn't you want to have a bigger knowledge regarding a lot of aspects of drawing and painting? I think ambition also has a big role regarding the artists that make it and the ones that do not

[Anonymous No.3643156]

>>3642489
The NPC meme is not even a month old you spastic. Not everyone can be as cool and hip as you and only use memes that were created this very day.

[Anonymous No.3643178]

>>3643156
the meme is older than when /pol/ decides its kewl

[Anonymous No.3643293]

>>3642401
>>3642348
>>3642345
holy shit crab city in this thread. anons drawing is genuinely high quality and shows both a sturdy fundamental skill and aesthetic sense.

[Anonymous No.3643298]

>>3643293
>anons drawing is genuinely high quality
top lel
Only crab is the anon in question.

[Anonymous No.3643299]

>>3643298
not him but unironically post work. pretty sure you are eric tier

[Anonymous No.3643307]

>>3643299
No, it would be embarrassing to be associated with this thread.

I'm not trying to say that lineart guy is shit (I think he's got potential). It's just irritating that he criticizes OP's pic for things like perspective when his own lineart (ironic when posted as response to a painting) drawings are mediocre in that department. He couldn't do something like OP's pic at his current level. If you call people crabs for thinking this, you're just /beg/ too.

[Anonymous No.3643314]

>>3643307
>No, it would be embarrassing to be associated with this thread.
its a fucking chinese cartoon forum fuck off with this pathetic excuse
anon has better anatomy and lineart than the OP image, i can guarantee you are /beg/ justdrawfag and are just resentful of an artist showing actual improvement by dedicating to the fundamentals

[Anonymous No.3643317]

>>3643307
nice shitpost

[Anonymous No.3643407]

>>3643314
No, the guy is Dunning-Kruger and you're still at the level where you're dazzled by defined musculature.

>dedicating to the fundamentals
...of which color and value are parts that Dunning-Kruger here has not been able to display, despite claiming to be able to outdo OP in this regard. The rants about dedicating to the "fundamentals" before painting are misguided bullshit to begin with. Total joke

[Anonymous No.3644133]

>>3640113
I mean, I'll commend them for the attention to detail on the mechanical parts, but the rest is just par for the course weebshit with a bit more polish than usual. Far from "realistic".

[Anonymous No.3644163]

>>3642148
>>3642333
This is actually pretty good, anon. Just wanted to put that out there because this shithole should recognize when something good is good, or at least decent.
I have mixed feelings about your faces though, especially with the dude looking at the gun. Rest is pretty good tho, just weird faces going on.

[Anonymous No.3644212]

>>3642148
>>3642333
You don't have the right to criticize anyone when your "art" looks like it belongs on Deviantart.

[Anonymous No.3644525]

>>3644163

Yeah, plenty of people say that about my stuff. I'm trying to make faces more appealing, and not awkward looking. Need to check more people's tricks and lessons about how to draw good expressions and facial proportions


This thread turned into a open war because of me so sorry for ruining it. Thank you for the compliments regarding the work I posted and thank you too for the criticism.

It feels nice when people value the things you because of course you want to compliment for your hard work, it is also important for people to criticize what you do. You won't evolve if all you get is positive feedback for sympathy. You won't evolve and learn what you did wrong. You need people to be critical That's how you improve your work and maybe, a way to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

I still think I can do a better job than OP's pic. I don't think I would make the same mistakes regarding perspective and anatomy. Maybe I'm wrong. I know I have a lot to improve and that is why I'm focusing on the basics till I'm confident about it.

So yeah. I will still monitor this thread to read any positive or negative feedback. But I will keep my thoughts to myself regarding others work to not spread more of my cancer.

[Anonymous No.3644528]

Yeah, plenty of people say that about my stuff. I'm trying to make faces more appealing, and not awkward looking. Need to check more people's tricks and lessons about how to draw good expressions and facial proportions


This thread turned into a open war because of me so sorry for ruining it. Thank you for the compliments regarding the work I posted and thank you too for the criticism.

It feels nice when people value the things you do because of course you want people to compliment your hard work, it is also important for people to criticize what you do. You won't evolve if all you get is positive feedback for sympathy. You won't evolve and learn what you did wrong. You need people to be critical That's how you improve your work and maybe, a way to avoid repeating the same mistakes.

I still think I can do a better job than OP's pic. I don't think I would make the same mistakes regarding perspective and anatomy. Maybe I'm wrong. I know I have a lot to improve and that is why I'm focusing on the basics till I'm confident about it.

So yeah. I will still monitor this thread to read any positive or negative feedback. But I will keep my thoughts to myself regarding others work to not spread more of my cancer.

[Anonymous No.3644533]

>>3644528

>Yeah, plenty of people say that about my stuff. I'm trying to make faces more appealing, and not awkward looking. Need to check more people's tricks and lessons about how to draw good expressions and facial proportions

was for >>3644163

[Anonymous No.3644541]

>>3640113
>those stubby arms
>realistic
>that face
>>>>>>>>realistic

[Anonymous No.3644579]

>>3642148
People are just mad that you shit all over their favorite loli artist with facts and backed up that you can draw better.

lmao, keep making virgin weebs assmad, you're doing gods work.

[Anonymous No.3644640]

>>3644579
No need to reply to yourself.

[Anonymous No.3644668]

>>3644579
>samefagging

How embrassing

[Anonymous No.3644804]

>>3644528
It's ok anon I think you're on the right path. At least you had the balls to pyw. Don't let the crabs bring you down.

[Anonymous No.3644859]

>>3644804

Thank you. I know I need a lot of work, but I'm motivated to keep working on my stuff, to improve.
People are right. I still have a lot of issues to deal with regarding my drawings, but I think I'm getting there. Just need more practice

[Anonymous No.3644898]

technical flaws aside, does no one else find OP incredibly uncanny and fucking terrifying looking?

[Anonymous No.3644908]

>>3644898
Some people experience the uncanny valley differently from others. Yeah I think it looks weird, not unsettling, but I'd expect someone to feel that way.

[Anonymous No.3644954]

>>3640113
Looks like some grotesque cartoon-realism centaur creature. I can only take this as a virulent insult to art itself and I am left simply horrified and appalled.

[Anonymous No.3645107]

>>3644859
I replied to you before about the faces but I think you'd benefit from more specific advice/criticism: you have good loomis on your bodies, really good, but you need better loomis on your faces (like here >>3644528), I feel like you probably know the structure of a head and face but just turn it all off when drawing and end up drawing symbols. The problem is that some people use symbols they know look good, even if they don't understand them, but I feel like your symbols are just "whatever works" and it both a) doesn't work 100% and b) isn't aesthetically pleasing like what someone copying what they remember from a generic anime face would be. Either try to make sense of head structure and practice to stylize it in your own way finding shapes and proportions you find pleasant to the eye, or straight up copy some of your favorite artists to get their style. Don't worry, your style will shine through (as long as you're not sticking TOO close to the artists you're copying). I feel like it's very easy for people to find a style for drawing the body without even realizing you're making it your style, but when it comes to the head it's a different issue and people don't make up their mind. You've got some sexy lines and gestures on your bodies, you need to somehow apply that to your faces.
In short: either loomis all the way and let your naturally preferred shapes/lines/proportions shine through, or copy whatever old or new anime/famous artist you really like.
What I'm telling you here is nothing you can't find on the sticky, but sometimes we overlook very simple and basic stuff that could
improve our drawings. See what you can do with that, and sorry for my vague advice without solid examples, take it with a grain of salt I guess. Godspeed.

[Anonymous No.3645114]

>>3645107
>>3644859
Actually looking at your faces again, maybe you don't have enough loomis there. Practice face anatomy and structure some more. The Riley method will make wonders for you, look it up on google or youtube. I feel like it'd compliment your bodies really well and once you get it right your faces will be top tier, because it's all about relationships between the different features of the face (not unlike anatomical relationships in the body) and it also works for stylized faces, if you couple it with making sense of said features in 3D then your next Misty will pop some artistic boners.
That's just my 2 cents.

[Anonymous No.3645151]

>>3645107
>>3645114

Thank you a lot for your feedback seriously. Your criticism is probably the more in depth analyses someone ever did to my stuff. I will follow your suggestion closely and strictly. I have issues with faces, even with just keeping a specific style. I tend to not keep a cohesive structure.

I shall study faces and work on expressions more. Thank you again for your constructive criticism
I have a tumblr page. I don't want to push my luck, but in case you are curious to check more of my stuff, please do.

http://andreclemente.tumblr.com/

Again, thank you for the help and feedback.

[Anonymous No.3645167]

>>3645151
No problem man!
>I will follow your suggestion closely and strictly
Geez now I feel pressured haha, just follow it for a bit and see if it actually works for you. Everyone here thinks they know what they're talking about, but who knows if we're actually right. I guess you'll find out.

I don't use tumblr (maybe I should for the sake of art, same for Instagram), but do you happen to have an artstation or deviantart page? Twitter maybe? I do want to see and follow your progress.

[Anonymous No.3645198]

>>3640113
>footchad makes feet illistration tier
fucking based

[Anonymous No.3645760]

>>3645167

I don't have twitter no more and artstation i never dared to make an account there because I don't want to shit the place with my low tier art.
I have a deviant page (of course) so feel free to check it out
https://www.deviantart.com/andreclemente

[Anonymous No.3645832]

>>3641098
Am I the only one who think Sakimichan's drawing seems, heartless?
I know it's a vague concept I'm saying and I know that her drawing is super good but I can't seem to feel some sort of oomph in it.

[Anonymous No.3645841]

>>3645832
You're certainly not unique there. I don't find anything interesting about her work let alone sexy.

[Anonymous No.3645848]

>>3645841
Oh good. Thought I was the only one who don't feel anything much when I see her drawings.

[Anonymous No.3645860]

>>3645841
>>3645832
>>3645848

She draws amazingly, but has no originality, nothing really engaging.
It's generic erotic drawings.
Female or male character laying down or in a sexy pose wearing either lingerie or some simplistic outfit to forcefully connect it with a popular character.

I think she did erotic art from either Rei or Asuka which is nothing but a normal, adult body wearing a bikini with the patterns of the plug suit.
Incredibly drawn, but incredibly bland shit.

[Anonymous No.3645867]

>>3645860
Thanks for pointing that out. Plenty of things makes a lot of sense now.
Sometimes when I see a childish and less professional drawing, I tend to like it a lot more than I expected.
I guess it was the factor of originality which made me felt that.

[Anonymous No.3645871]

>>3641098
I wish I was A2.

[Anonymous No.3645874]

>>3645867
You can tell when someone knows what they're painting. She doesn't know the characters or what is appealing, her work isn't even erotic, just lifeless dolls staring into space that are too generic to look realistic and too over rendered to have an illustrative appeal.

[Anonymous No.3646518]

>>3641288
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=d-7o9xYp7eE

[Anonymous No.3648903]

>>3640925
The bird is dead, anon.

[Anonymous No.3648955]

>>3640901
i would hang this on my wall.