Inspo Thread : Traditional Painting

[Anonymous No.3544466]

What painters/artists do you look at for inspiration?
Looking for some new painters so please post your tastes / anyone lesser known is a plus
Ill start, first with Ernst Ludwig Kirchner

[Anonymous No.3544467]

>>3544466
Cecily Brown

[Anonymous No.3544470]

>>3544466
Thanks for the new thread - keep them coming

[Anonymous No.3544477]

>>3544466
Francis Bacon

[Anonymous No.3544481]

>>3544466
Dana Schutz

[Anonymous No.3544482]

>>3544481
whoops forgot image

[Anonymous No.3544488]

>>3544466
Frank Auerbach

[Anonymous No.3544492]

>>3544466
R.B. Kitaj
that's all for now, will continue to bump if there's interest.

[Anonymous No.3544511]

I really like Juan Gris

[Anonymous No.3544513]

>>3544511
Fuck, forgot the picture

[Anonymous No.3544515]

>>3544511
>>3544513
And George Tooker

[Anonymous No.3544516]

>>3544511
he seems pretty chill for a cubist
you might like Mimmo Paladino (pic related) gives off a similar vibe

[Anonymous No.3544616]

>>3544466
Op here bumping with Brian Calvin

[Anonymous No.3544626]

>>3544466
Correggio coming through, you aint heard of him because he didn't draw helicopters in his sketchbook but he was the best painter in the renaissaunce

[Anonymous No.3544641]

>>3544466

[Anonymous No.3544644]

Fernando Botero

[Anonymous No.3544652]

Dasha Shiskin

[Anonymous No.3544659]

Allison Schulnik

[Anonymous No.3544718]

>>3544488

I've been trying to understand Auerbach recently since reading about his life and working practices.

I see something in them, but I still don't quite get his paintings.

Tell me what you think about them. What is it that you see in his paintings?

[Anonymous No.3544728]

Clayton Schiff

[Anonymous No.3544730]

Sascha Braunig

[Anonymous No.3544733]

>>3544718
huge influence on chumbun actually, especially his early work.
the way i look at his pictures is that like, there's a realistic portrait in there, sort of behind the paint. so like there's like a really strong sense of paint and the brush on canvas and everything, and that somehow emphases the realness of the sitter even though it's counter-intuitive. pretty subjective stuff tho, i'll admit.

[Anonymous No.3544736]

Vasarely

[Anonymous No.3544743]

Xylor Jane

[Anonymous No.3544747]

>>3544718
To me it looks as though he has peeled back the figure to release a specter of disillusionment and longing. There's so much confidence in these smudged forms that just look so right.
From a more technical standpoint his compositions are dynamic, the mark is expressive in materiality yet rudimentary in form, and his colors are incredible. I could go on he's one of my favorites
I know what you mean though some of his pieces I'll just look at and think, that looks like a roblox avatar are you kidding, and yet still he finds a way to convince me

[Anonymous No.3544756]

Richard Oelze

[Anonymous No.3544769]

Robin F Williams

[Anonymous No.3544771]

Tomory Dodge

[Anonymous No.3544774]

William T Williams

[Anonymous No.3544775]

Jakub Julian Ziolkowski

[Anonymous No.3544822]

Denis Sarazhin
I love his rendering

[Anonymous No.3544839]

>>3544747
>>3544733

Great responses. Thanks.

I guess I can see this stuff in his paintings. It's like he's looking for the essences behind elements of figuration, and he has to emphasise the fact that he is using brush strokes to eliminate any sort of attempt at illusion, because that would be counter to finding truth.

He appears to put all of his creative energy into finding deep, hidden visual truths in a figure, things that can't be easily expressed, but that, with a lot of trial and error, he can find a way to describe using paint strokes. His work appears to straddle the abstract and the figurative.

[Anonymous No.3545333]

>>3544466
Oh shit OP, Thats the girl painting I've been looking for- I tell you, this was a model, and there's another artist that also painted this very session
If anyone knows or happens to find that, I'd appreciate it a lot

Dont know sauce to my pic, would like to as well

[Anonymous No.3545413]

Love me some of this guy.

[Anonymous No.3545571]

Lucian Freud

>>3544467
>>3544477
>>3544822
Some good taste in here so far

[Anonymous No.3545577]

Degas

>>3544467
This image has inspired Cecily a lot

[Anonymous No.3545749]

>>3544616
quality thread so far
>>3544659
>>3544730
>>3545333
ty for sharing these
Cont. with Elizabeth Peyton

[Anonymous No.3545750]

>>3545749
Marlene Dumas

[Anonymous No.3545753]

>>3545750
Euan Uglow

[Anonymous No.3545757]

>>3545753
Richard Diebenkorn

[Anonymous No.3545770]

>>3545757
some classic egon schiele

[Anonymous No.3546195]

>>3544466
de kooning

[Anonymous No.3546229]

>>3546195
his wife tho

[Anonymous No.3546444]

Kai Althoff

[Anonymous No.3546448]

>>3546444
Sasnal

[Anonymous No.3546449]

>>3546448
Tuymans

[Anonymous No.3546452]

>>3546449
Rene Daniels

[Anonymous No.3546454]

>>3546452
Peter Doig

[Anonymous No.3546457]

>>3546454
Richard Aldrich

[Anonymous No.3546471]

>>3546454
>Peter Doig

[Anonymous No.3546501]

>>3544728
Thanks for sharing, I'm enjoying his work.

[Anonymous No.3546510]

Zhang Enli 张恩利

[Anonymous No.3546512]

>>3546510
Tang Dixin 唐狄鑫

[Anonymous No.3546524]

>>3546512
Zhang Liguo 张立国

[Anonymous No.3546527]

>>3546524
João Queiroz

[Anonymous No.3546528]

>>3546527
Jorge Queiroz

[Anonymous No.3546540]

>>3544482
>>3544488
>art school

jokes aside i like cecily brown "when she's painting good" lol.

>>3545757

i fucking love diebenkorn.

>>3546449

i like tuymans too but he is a troll and his paintings

>>3544747
>peeled back the figure to release a specter of disillusionment and longing

frank was an angry recluse. his paintings are a reaction to what was going on in the art world when he was making them. you can't isolate them. you mention you can look at his work from a "technical standpoint" but that is false because there is nothing technical about his work when you look at his intent, process, and final results. if he was to belong to a movement which he doesnt, he is a continuation of the american fauvist movement which is still going strong and I would say the dominant painting trend in NYC art galleries. remember that les fauves means "the wildcats" not "artist who favored color over form." it's also disingenuous to say his colors are "incredible" when even a cursory viewing of his paintings shows a limited range and facility. imo he was deliberately using mud and making his paintings as mindless and as ugly as he could. incredible? no. original? maybe. valuable? up for debate.

[Anonymous No.3546549]

>>3544644

botero is fucking hilarious. picasso roasted forever.

>>3544626
>correggio

jesus christ dude you literally could have randomly stuck your hand into a bag of renaissance artists and picked a better one.

>>3544492

kitaj is cool but is his stuff is borderline editorial work not as much fine art imo.

[Anonymous No.3546556]

>>3546549
well that wasn't what they thought at the time, correggio was said to combine the drawing ability of michelangelo with the painting skills of titian

[Anonymous No.3546563]

>>3546556

both michelangelo and titian were better at both drawing and painting than correggio. also raphael, giorgione, lorenzo lotto, fra bartolomeo, pontormo, bellini, bronzino, etc...

some of correggio's paintings are great, but his bad paintings are really bad and i wouldn't be surprised if he didn't even make his great paintings since that wasn't uncommon.

[Anonymous No.3546571]

>>3546563
nope, wrong. suprised you didnt include davinci with pleb picks like those

[Anonymous No.3546579]

>>3546571
>nope, wrong.
Nice argument, you sure showed him who's the boss of this gym.

[Anonymous No.3546580]

>>3546571

pontormo and bronzino are pleb picks? yeah you're a fucking troll go fuck yourself. i've actually seen titian's work and many others that I have listed including correggio's work in person. I know people who work for museums and been in many private collections. you're just a fucking retard that believes what art historians tell you. you definitely don't know how to paint or draw otherwise you would immediately spot how bad his paintings are.

pic related its some of correggio's genius. truly a combination of titian and michelangelo. how could i have missed it.

[Anonymous No.3546583]

>>3546580

for reference, here is michelangelo

[Anonymous No.3546584]

>>3546583

and titian

not even comparable to the mediocrity that is correggio. sorry kiddo.

[Anonymous No.3546586]

>>3546579
im not going to have a real argument with someone who is clearly just racist against parma

[Anonymous No.3546590]

>>3546586
>racist against parma

haha you're pathetic. no one cares what city the artist came from. this is what i mean when i say you need to stop reading about the paintings and start looking at them. you're like a woman who tries to drive a car with the manual on her windshield.

have some more artwork by inferior artists.

some pleb tier bronzino.

[Anonymous No.3546591]

>>3546586

it's worth noting that pontormo was not only skilled but innovative. have you seen other paintings of this scene? why am i asking that. you probably just read about it instead.

[Anonymous No.3546594]

>>3546591

no one. no one lit their scenes like pontormo. really ahead of his time.

[Anonymous No.3546622]

>>3546591
meh, for deposition from the cross it has to be il rosso

[Anonymous No.3546634]

>>3546622

literary types always like flat paintings. let me guess you also like durer and manet?

[Anonymous No.3546638]

>>3546634
you aint even heard of who i like boy

[Anonymous No.3546639]

>>3546638

try me bitch.

[Anonymous No.3546642]

>>3546639
someone you haven't heard of hmm..picasso

[Anonymous No.3546648]

>>3546642

the only reason you know picasso exists is because of the stein family campaigned for him in the united states to drive up the price since they were major collectors of his work. otherwise he was just another hipster.

[Anonymous No.3547012]

>>3546540
incredible color does not mean there are many hues. The color relationships are incredible. If you think his paintings are just muddy and deliberately so you aren't looking hard enough.
and sure a fauvist was a fauvist but even Matisse was more hedonistic than wild.

[Anonymous No.3547272]

>>3545770
Paul Klee
(pronounced CLAY frustratingly enough despite all of his paintings sounding like kleeee)

[Anonymous No.3547273]

>>3547272
>>3547272
saved some study after it on accident sorry klee

[Anonymous No.3548670]

>>3546540
Woah woah woah
Auerbach belongs to a movement
Its reffered to as "The London School"
to refer to the painters that turned to abstract figurative art in an age that was moving away from that tradition.
The book Art Speak defines the term and many others if your curios

[Anonymous No.3548987]

>>3544769
Love her work. Pic related is shit quality. But I saw it in person and have been a fan ever since. So confrontational. So unfazed.

[Anonymous No.3548998]

Pieter breugel the elder. The canvas isn’t even big

[Anonymous No.3548999]

Wayne theibaud. Master draftsman

[Anonymous No.3549163]

>>3547012
>you aren't looking hard enough

emperor's new clothes kiddo. i've studied his paintings more in depth than you and the conclusion i keep coming to no matter which way i interpret them is that he was an angry recluse and he was deliberately trying to accelerate the rate of badness in paintings so as to draw attention to how aesthetically and morally corrupt the art world was, is, and will continue to be until you people pull sotheby's cock out of your mouth and open your fucking eyes.

there is nothing incredible about the relationships. you're rationalizing because you were told he was a great painter by people who have more authority, clout, and money than you.

>>3548670
>auerbach belonged to a movement

i dont care what you read in a book written by some moron. again, pull your head out of your ass for a moment and try to think independently. look at his paintings along side all other paintings that were being made during that time. see who his friends were. look at the paintings he looked at. don't just obediently slop up whatever the critics and art historians and christies shills tell you what to believe. try to think critically. i know its easier to just accept authority on its face but try.

>>3544482

dana schutz is funny but is it art? hmm. more like glorified cartoons.

>>3544477

overrated because he was edgy and gay.

>>3547272
severely overrated.

>>3545753

underrated. also a recluse. dimensionality of paintings is hit or miss.

>>3546195
misunderstood. a lot of his compositions are actually quite academic.

>>3546527
a less interesting max ernst

>>3546528
I really like this. never heard of this guy. very interesting combination of technical play and religious allusion.

>>3545571

one of the few talents from his generation. was also a degenerate gambler and was constantly in debt to the london bookies. really one of the most innovative observational painters.

[Anonymous No.3549266]

>>3549163
>misunderstood. a lot of his compositions are actually quite academic.
Can you elaborate on this? What exactly is being misunderstood about his?

[Anonymous No.3549320]

>>3549266
>De Kooning strongly opposed the restrictions imposed by naming movements

art historians regularly classify him as the leader of the abstract expressionist movement, when he rejected it. his paintings are also mischaracterized by art historians who typically have no eye for composition. they see a painting like this and use words like "vigorous" when in reality the composition is actually quite tame.

[Anonymous No.3549609]

>>3544626
>it's not the best but the most forward thinking artists which take the test of time
>in 200 it will be shad and not kjg the most remembered artist of our time
it's not fair

[Anonymous No.3549913]

>>3549163
To illustrate the absurdity of this "I must disprove your idea of quality" mentality allow me to offer a rebuttal.
>>3544482 the word cartoon traces itself back in origin to the symbol. the hieroglyph. thus is the only kind of painting abstract? or do you merely scoff at the simplicity of rendering the figure as if these offer nothing else?
>>3544477
If anyone has an excuse to be edgy is bacon. The dude lived a life of trauma and masochism in the direct aftermath of the greatest conflict known to mankind. Like at what point do you allow yourself to feel an express pain? is there a threshold?>>3547272
He taught at The Bauhaus school, now the model for the majority of art schools. As far as modern academia he receives a lot of praise for his influence and role in art today. You can dislike him, but he still is a key figure in art education.
>>3546540
Auerbach is quite the oddball sure, But a reactionary to the art world at the time? I don't think so. To me, he seems as though he had his own metrics of quality and honed them over time internally. Sure he thought the art world was greatly flawed but he quietly persisted despite that. He was a recluse out of need not spite.
He belonged to a movement insofar as he helped bring back figuration along with his contemporaries. The movement is coincidental of course, but still relevant.
Calling him a Fauvist though is pretty philistine, just as much so as calling them mindless, or ugly. There is a truth to the figures he paints, they are highly considered. You can get a hint at this by looking at how he paints portraits of the same sitter over time, certain abstractions remain as translations of the sitters face to his mode of seeing from piece to piece. That's certainly not mindless. Christ he worked in charcoal for years and years to try and draw the way he intended to paint before arriving at his arguably most successful portraits.

this could go on ad nauseum. lets all just share some art

[Anonymous No.3550347]

joram Roukes

[Anonymous No.3550383]

>>3544466

[Anonymous No.3550568]

>>3546580
Ever seen Venus of Urbino?
I think You should. Protip- in person. Then
look at Pontormo you will have the lolz.
Its not about the proportion mess because El Greco and medieval guys can stand the comparision.

[Anonymous No.3550899]

The thread exists, yet there's nothing but there's nothing but concept art and loomis thumping on the board.
Anons, do you simply lurk or has trying to interact been unfulfilling?

[Anonymous No.3550980]

>>3548987
reminds me of Carroll Dunham

[Anonymous No.3550996]

Jamian Juliano Villani

[Anonymous No.3551003]

Taha Heydari

[Anonymous No.3551019]

>>3551003

[Anonymous No.3551069]

>>3550899
Op here,
I just really love painting and Im looking for outlets with like minded people to learn some things/ hear some harsh perspectives that people are less inclined to share without anonymity. I lurked for awhile but this was my first thread here.
Thankful for all the varied perspectives and new works that Im seeing in here, but overall this boards pretty dead/irritating/too focused on the digital painting meme.

[Anonymous No.3551116]

Zdzislaw Beksinski

[Anonymous No.3551127]

>>3551116
doot doot

[Anonymous No.3551349]

>>3544466
>>3544467
>>3544477
>>3544482
>>3544488
>>3544492
>>3544513
>>3544516
>>3544616
>>3544641
>>3544652
>>3544659
>>3544728
>>3544730
>>3544736
>>3544743
>>3544747
>>3544756
>>3544769
>>3544771
>>3544774
>>3544775
>>3545333
>>3545413
>>3545757
>>3546195
>>3546452
>>3546454
>>3546457
>>3546512
>>3546524
>>3546527
>>3546528
>>3547272
>>3547273
>>3548987
>>3549320
>>3549913
>>3550347
>>3550980
>>3550996
>>3551019
>Literally shit tier

[Anonymous No.3551351]

>>3544644
>>3544822
>>3545571
>>3545577
>>3545750
>>3545753
>>3544515
>>3545770
>>3546229
>>3546444
>>3546449
>>3546471
>>3546510
>>3551116
>medium tier

>>3546448
>>3548999
>>3545749
>good tier

>>3546580
>>3546583
>>3546584
>>3546591
>>3546594
>>3546590
>>3548998
>>3550383
>>3544626
>Patrician tier

This is the actual state of /ic/
No doubt why it sucks

[Anonymous No.3551693]

>>3551351
>rendering is art.

[Anonymous No.3551696]

>>3551351
>there is an objective standard of what is good/beautiful and what isn't
yeah keep deluding yourself to that

[Anonymous No.3551891]

>>3551693
>cant draw for shit and has no taste so he limits his praise of great artists to their rendering abilities

uninstall

[Anonymous No.3551920]

>>3551891
I draw fine, and though i find the renaissance a little stilted, it is fantastic work. I was mocking the close mindedness of that list.
post work.

[Anonymous No.3552135]

>>3551920

is that your painting? jesus christ you are fucking delusional.

[Anonymous No.3552394]

>>3551351
If your tastes dont line then you can always post better stuff and revel in (yous)
theres more to art than rendering tho.
Some people don't much care for representational stuff. If you think they're wrong you can always write a quick argument for your tastes / any semblance of input.
Im actually kind of curious what your metrics of quality are and why.

[Anonymous No.3552783]

>>3551696
If you don't like the what I like you simply have shit taste.

[Anonymous No.3552896]

>>3551351
fuck off retard no one gives a shit about your shit taste. take a (you) and go away.

[Anonymous No.3552898]

>>3544466
Brian Froud

[Anonymous No.3552964]

good shit anons

[Anonymous No.3552965]

>>3552964

[Anonymous No.3552966]

>>3552965

[Anonymous No.3552967]

>>3552966

[Anonymous No.3552974]

giotto

[Anonymous No.3554681]

Edouard vuillard

[Anonymous No.3554706]

thayaht

[Anonymous No.3554742]

>>3551351
Why are they booing you? You're right!

[Anonymous No.3556838]

Max Beckmann. Why doesn’t anyone post in this thread?

[Anonymous No.3556867]

>>3556838
i like pictures that give you a lot to look at, that's something i'm trying to incorporate into my own work. my tendency is towards like really really simple stuff, so it's a stretch.

and some art, a detail in a velasquez, look at that finger, painting is the needlewoman

[Anonymous No.3556898]

>>3556838
this is on my copy of kafka metamorphosis

[Anonymous No.3556915]

>>3556898
Nice! Here’s Otto Dix. Big fan of German new objectivism

[Anonymous No.3557347]

>>3556915
Also a big fan of new objectivism. Going to post a naughty one, but I absolutely love how ugly the watercolors of george grosz are, although they look ugly they have beautiful lines, use of water and color.

[Anonymous No.3557356]

Picabia

[Anonymous No.3557700]

>>3557347
Wow that’s pretty naughty indeed. The colors certainly match the content. Kind of remind me of el greco colors

[Anonymous No.3557721]

>>3544728
>tfw

[Anonymous No.3558993]

[Anonymous No.3559052]

>>3558993
my man

[Anonymous No.3559077]

>>3544466
these threads are really the one and only reason for me to have some hope in /ic/

here's one of my favorites. Andro Wekua, from the country of Georgia.
saw one of his exhibitions "by accident", fell in love instantly. he does collages, short films, sculptures, paintings, prints.

[Anonymous No.3559080]

>>3544641
that looks like it was stolen from the "Dune" concept art by Moebius

[Anonymous No.3559082]

>>3544769
>Robin F Williams
This is actually a Kippenberger copy
I'd find it fair to mention that!

[Anonymous No.3559086]

>>3545577
>Degas
>>>3544467
>This image has inspired Cecily a lot

>knows what has inspired C Brown
>appreciates Degas as well
muh man

[Anonymous No.3559087]

>>3546510
>not getting rid of the tracing grid
>such a bold, post--post modern move
ugh

[Anonymous No.3559090]

>>3548998
this painting is in Vienna. it has it's own universe, very immersive. love seeing it.

[Anonymous No.3559101]

[Anonymous No.3559104]

>>3559101
>not writing the sauce name
SAUCE!
this perfectly illustrates babies.

[Anonymous No.3559109]

>>3559104
ups sorry. Tala Madani.
http://www.contemporaryartdaily.com/2015/08/tala-madani-at-david-kordansky/

[Anonymous No.3559111]

>>3559101
man is that great, the depth and the space and the marks. jealous

[Anonymous No.3559131]

>>3559109
thx!

[Anonymous No.3559163]

Of all of Guston's work, this one is probably the most interesting to me. I saw it in person and the impression it made on me is really indescribable.
It's like that with most of his work for me. He's probably one of my favorite artists and what makes him stand out even more is how much of a genuine and insightful person he seems to have been.

He's really good at speaking about the nature and strangeness of the act of painting.

[Anonymous No.3559524]

[Anonymous No.3559583]

[Anonymous No.3559840]

[Anonymous No.3560590]

[Anonymous No.3560625]

Michael Borremans

[Anonymous No.3561291]

based thread

[Anonymous No.3561358]

Does anyone know if hobby lobby sells gamblin artists oils? I see gamsol and mediums on their website but no paints

[Anonymous No.3561643]

ensor, james

[Anonymous No.3562188]

>>3561358
Sorry, no idea. Why don't you order paints online?

>>3561643
My man

[Anonymous No.3563266]

>>3544466
saw this in person, was so creepy and gross it put me off balthus forever. so it made me think a lot about art and myself and was very inspiration in a backwards sort of way.

[Anonymous No.3563269]

>>3559583
hey there's a painting with a weird 1-point perspective shoved over to one side composition like i said you'd never be able to find in that collab thread with the crappy composition

[Anonymous No.3565530]

Keeping this thread alive

[Anonymous No.3565617]

[Anonymous No.3565652]

Parker s Jackson

[Anonymous No.3566502]

Ilya Repin

[Anonymous No.3566830]

>>3565652
That's terrifying

[Anonymous No.3566835]

>>3566502
there's no chromatic no ilya

[Anonymous No.3566856]

>>3566835
?

[Anonymous No.3567903]

bump

[Anonymous No.3568019]

Man, you all have shit taste.
Rubens, Rembrandt, Delacroix and Daumier are patrician tier.

[Anonymous No.3568025]

>>3568019
Watteau too

[Anonymous No.3568028]

>>3568019

[Anonymous No.3568032]

>>3568028
(for the Rubens, note the way he colors flesh)

[Anonymous No.3568034]

>>3568019

[Anonymous No.3568056]

>>3568025
I enjoy his drawings much more than his paintings. Not much of a fan of rococo in general though

[Anonymous No.3569540]

Michael Leonard

[Anonymous No.3571570]

Manet

[Anonymous No.3573138]

De chirico

[Anonymous No.3573798]

Thomas Houseago
technically sculpture however the use of plaster i very painterly as well as the implementation of drawing techniques

[Anonymous No.3573864]

>>3573798
Garbage.

[Anonymous No.3573877]

>>3573864
Renoir is the definition of bad kitschy chocolate box art

[Anonymous No.3574132]

>>3573877
Disagree, it’s just become fun to hate on renoir. This is a masterpiece, the light coming through the trees. There’s so much happening, that your eye goes all across the canvas. The amount of detail just alone in that table to the right, a tiny little still life is awe-inspiring.

[Anonymous No.3574279]

some cool shit in this thread

[Anonymous No.3574317]

>>3574279
aaaand you went ahead and ruined it
college poster tier

[Anonymous No.3574320]

This was a massive canvas though if I recall, they had to haul this thing around. it couldn't fit on a regular easel

[Anonymous No.3574325]

>>3574317
fuck off. Dave Choes art has more soul than any of the pussy shit you probably like

[Anonymous No.3574328]

>>3574320
>>3574132

[Anonymous No.3574349]

>>3574325
It’s shit

[Anonymous No.3574351]

[Anonymous No.3574610]

>>3573864
i like Renoir too. Its not like I think he's a master or anything but this thread is for inspo. I find that figure to be generative and thought to share it. Don't think that anyone here is asking for any opinion besides the image you post.

[Anonymous No.3574613]

>>3574610
if you don't think renoir is a master then your artistic sensibilities have room for a lot of growth

[Anonymous No.3574630]

>>3551696
Of course it is. And if you ever read anything on anthropology or renaissance platonism, you'd know why.

But keep deluding yourself by worshiping garbage as divine.

[Anonymous No.3575198]

>>3574613
I mean the artist I posted sorry for the confusing wording Renoir is a master absolutely.
the artist i posed is relatively young but have interesting ideas.

[Anonymous No.3575424]

>>3575198
Which artist?

[Anonymous No.3575440]

>>3575424
>>3573798

[Anonymous No.3577334]

Etchings are always inspiring.
Creating such a rich image with only black ink, I've been wanting to try it myself.

[Anonymous No.3577467]

>>3577334
thats not ink

[Anonymous No.3577468]

>>3577467
(in the sense that its not drawn with ink but printed)

[Anonymous No.3577482]

>>3577334
but it's not printed in ink either

[Anonymous No.3577652]

>>3577334
Yep, dürer was based

[Anonymous No.3577682]

renoir, klimt, Leonardo, bougeareau, canepa. no abstract bullshit to comfort my shitty skills like you people

[Anonymous No.3577928]

>>3577652
>Blocks your path.

[Anonymous No.3577929]

>>3544466
>>3544467
>>3544477

[Anonymous No.3577934]

>>3551019
>>3551116
>>3551920
>>3552135
>>3552898
>>3552966
>>3552967
>>3552974
>>3554681
>>3554706
>>3556838
>>3556915
>>3557356
>>3558993
>>3559077
>>3559082
>>3559101
>>3559163
>>3559583
>>3560625
>>3560590
>>3563266
>>3565530
>>3565617
>>3565652
>>3569540
>>3573138
>>3573798
>>3574279
>>3574325
>>3574351
>>3574630
>>3577929

All of these posters have....pretty terrible taste.

Posting some good art.

[Anonymous No.3577940]

>>3577482
>>3577467
What is it then?

[Anonymous No.3577942]

[Anonymous No.3577944]

[Anonymous No.3577946]

[Anonymous No.3577947]

[Anonymous No.3577948]

[Anonymous No.3577951]

[Anonymous No.3577952]

>>3577951
Looks like an American cartoon by Raphael.

[Anonymous No.3577954]

[Anonymous No.3577956]

[Anonymous No.3578150]

>>3544769
Her work is really lovely

[Anonymous No.3578159]

>>3550996
She is pretty cool.i recommend yoi check out her art21 shorts on youtube

[Anonymous No.3578184]

takato yamamoto

[Anonymous No.3578239]

Carter Goodrich

[Anonymous No.3578828]

>>3577934
>All of these posters have....pretty terrible taste.
>Posting some good art.

[Anonymous No.3581080]

keeping this thread alive for all the weeb philistines

[Anonymous No.3581181]

>>3577934
>Giotto is bad
>posts rubens
I don't know what to say anon...

[Anonymous No.3581185]

[Anonymous No.3581187]

juan van der hamen

[Anonymous No.3581190]

Gijsbrechts, Cornelius Norbertus

[Anonymous No.3581191]

[Anonymous No.3581205]

[Anonymous No.3581214]

>>3581190
the classic trompe

[Anonymous No.3581319]

>>3544466

[Anonymous No.3581320]

>>3581319
forgot to add the picture

[Anonymous No.3582618]

>>3559080
it literally is, have you even seen the film?

[Anonymous No.3582644]

Brown

[Anonymous No.3584360]

bumping with a morandi

[Anonymous No.3584367]

>>3544466
Sargent, Waterhouse are my two favs.

[Anonymous No.3586610]

Pierre Bonnard

[Anonymous No.3586629]

>>3586610
Asuka?

[Anonymous No.3586978]

bömping with this awesome landscape
(i really need to know who made that)

[Anonymous No.3586991]

>>3586978
hodler, swiss i think, he did a lot of like weird neomedieval + realism stuff which is interesting as well as the touring landscape sorta stuff like your pic

[Anonymous No.3587023]

>>3586991

Yes, it is Ferdinand Hodler! thanks, anon :) what a great painter! kind of reminds me of Munch's landscapes

[Anonymous No.3587063]

>>3586610
there's some really beautiful use of colours i'd think of as ugly in there, really interesting stuff, favorite part:

[Anonymous No.3587079]

Nice thread. Adding some favourites of mine. This is Mamma Andersson.

[Anonymous No.3587080]

I don't know what the general opinion about Hope Gangloff is but I like her.

[Anonymous No.3587084]

and Alice Wellinger good surrealistic art

[Anonymous No.3587085]

I've enjoyed seeing the new works by Daniel Richter. he has said that for some of the figurative elements, he has painted from porn stills that he only looked at from the corner of his eyes (not directly, so only to get a vague impression of a body). I don't know how to translate it any better.

[Anonymous No.3587090]

[Anonymous No.3587096]

>>3587085
i've been thinking of doing something a bit like that, but with a digital method of obfuscation instead of just out the corner of the eyes

[Anonymous No.3587111]

>>3587096
how exactly?
i find richters method really interesting, as the translation of that vague image you see in the corner of your eye allows for a very strange, generalized look of limbs and bodies. i wish he hadn't explained it though, because that's now what i'm always thinking of when i look at the paintings. "explaining the joke" in this case didn't do so much damage, though. the paintings are still great, esp. when you see them in person (as always).

[Anonymous No.3587113]

>>3587111
well i tend to experiment but i'm thinking of zooming in a lot and using sharpen/blur cycles to find different edges other than the obvious ones, crush midtones, muck with the contrast, stuff like that, nothing too fancy or automated.

[Anonymous No.3587115]

>>3587113
intend, not tend

[Anonymous No.3587116]

>>3587113
i hope you don't think that that's something new
because it sounds a lot like the usual method of the likes of Ruan Jia

[Anonymous No.3587118]

>>3587116
don't think you understand what i mean
this is trad painting using digital stuff to look for ways to mess with the figure and get something really weird but still familiar and develop it into a consistent look

so i'm not sure what that'd have to do with like concept art

[Anonymous No.3587121]

>>3587118
>don't think you understand what i mean
quite possible
do you have any examples?
i also see a lot of potential in "missusing" these tools in order to create texture. i just don't see it being used that way anywhere.

[Anonymous No.3587144]

>>3587121
no i haven't done it yet lol, i guess the digital part would be something ott like this (just an example), then there'd be a lot of interpretation between that and the canvas

[Anonymous No.3587146]

>>3587144
>between that and the canvas
so you want to transfer that digital edit on canvas as the finished work?
i guess i need to see an actual example to understand what you mean. it's always very vague to explain these things compared to actually seeing it being done.

[Anonymous No.3587150]

>>3587146
no, there's the whole traditional part to go, the filtered thing is like 1/4 of the creative part ( or like 1% in terms of time), finished paintings would look completely different but have ideas that come from the filters churning up the figures

[Anonymous No.3587155]

>>3587150
i have developed a method of my own and have done a few paintings in that fashion. it has worked out great for me. (it involves mostly analogue steps and only one step of digital editing). not really interested in posting them here for obvious reasons.

but i like your way of thinking and i'd like to see what you come up with.

[Anonymous No.3587210]

[Anonymous No.3587215]

katz

[Anonymous No.3587217]

[Anonymous No.3588997]

Kandinsky

[Anonymous No.3589224]

>>3588997
Miss me with that geometrical Bauhaus shit

[Anonymous No.3590012]

>>3544466
For me, it's Dean Cornwell

[Anonymous No.3591412]

>>3559082
it's not a copy, it's a reinterpretation and a homage, something you see very often in todays art

[Anonymous No.3591415]

>>3551351
>>3577934
sad trolls are sad

[Anonymous No.3591443]

>>3591412
a copy is a copy, don't attach negative connotations to it, it's the right word, look it up in an art dictionary

[Anonymous No.3592557]

[Anonymous No.3592851]

>>3574325
DVDASA forever.

[Anonymous No.3592871]

>>3592557
i always felt with that one that he just wanted to paint some girl looking out a window by realised he need to sell it so he drew dicks all over it and gave it a funny title

[Anonymous No.3594988]

Bumping with freud

[Anonymous No.3594989]

>>3594988

[Anonymous No.3595007]

Ya'll need some Jesus, courtesy of Leon Bonnat.

[Anonymous No.3596436]

not apologising for the image size.

[Anonymous No.3597057]

[Anonymous No.3598560]

>>3597057
Who is that by?

[Anonymous No.3598987]

>>3544477
Do you have the one of the wolf in the dark room? I can't find it/remember the name of it. Only painting to give me chills.

[Anonymous No.3599357]

Wow, a lot of disturbing ass shit here. Why does it seem like you can make a painting so much creepier than a drawing?

[Anonymous No.3599369]

>>3598560
michael borremans

[Anonymous No.3599372]

[Anonymous No.3599424]

>>3596436
>>3597057
i used to post those exact two paintings here and someone picked up on it :3
nice! glad to see that.

>>3596436
saw this one irl and it i think was standing in front of it for like an hour. i was zoned out. notice the dynamic in the painting. in the left corner, the fairyman of styx, everything is rectangular, vertical and horizontal, arms and cliffs, like a barrier seperating the world of the living with hell.

pic related is
>Jonas Burgert
a bit pop, but still interesting, mostly large scale paintings.

[Anonymous No.3599699]

Cannot believe no one has posted this guy.
Or maybe that should tell me something.

[Anonymous No.3602675]

>>3599699
Who is that by?
This one is b odd nerdrum

[Anonymous No.3605101]

Katherine bradford

[Anonymous No.3605504]

>>3605101
I went to a show of her, there was one painting of a superman pissing, it was really inspirational

[Anonymous No.3605516]

>>3602675
based

[Anonymous No.3605559]

>>3602675
Paul Cezanne.
I retract my “tell me something “ statement due to its snobbish arrogance and conceit and gin and tonic.

[Anonymous No.3607376]

>>3605559
Nice. Very different from his other stuff. Completely different palette too

[Anonymous No.3607385]

Canaletto, Dmitri Belyukin.

pic related is my current favourite: Sergey Kuznetsov

[Anonymous No.3607481]

Too many to choose from but Richard Schmid.

[Anonymous No.3607482]

>>3607481

[Anonymous No.3607483]

>>3607482

[Anonymous No.3607484]

>>3607483

[Anonymous No.3607485]

>>3607484

[Anonymous No.3608743]

>>3551920
>that lower jaw
lol

[Anonymous No.3611330]

[Anonymous No.3612452]

>>3573138
mah nigz

[Anonymous No.3613838]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=WN5t1kHzQ-8

[Anonymous No.3613844]

[Anonymous No.3613848]

[Anonymous No.3614040]

[Anonymous No.3614041]

[Anonymous No.3614044]

[Anonymous No.3614045]

[Anonymous No.3615058]

>>3614045
good taste.

posting more german new objectivism

[Anonymous No.3617251]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=aaIQKhCGcng

>I got a message I can’t read, I got a message I can’t read
>Another message I can’t read

[Anonymous No.3617265]

[Anonymous No.3617266]

[Anonymous No.3617267]

[Anonymous No.3617292]

[Anonymous No.3617294]

[Anonymous No.3617295]

[Anonymous No.3617297]

[Anonymous No.3617299]

[Anonymous No.3617303]

unfortunate influence

[Anonymous No.3617305]

[Anonymous No.3618778]

[Anonymous No.3620270]

>>3551351
No one cares about your opinion mate.

[Anonymous No.3620273]

>>3574279
I like this, very pretty.

[Anonymous No.3620274]

>>3574317
No one cares what you think. Contribute or fuck off. Dick heads like you ruin these threads.

[Anonymous No.3620275]

>>3577934
Why do you think we care about what you think?

[Anonymous No.3620764]

>>3618778
absolutely fucking based Sanya Kantarovsky poster

[Anonymous No.3620795]

>>3620764
let's date

[Anonymous No.3620817]

>>3620795
I'm definitely up for it.

[Anonymous No.3621615]

Chantal Joffe

[Anonymous No.3621686]

Axel Krause

[Anonymous No.3621697]

>>3618778
This is so good. Thanks for sharing. So glad to find out he’s contemporary as well

[Anonymous No.3622454]

I really, really enjoy Katherine bernhardt’s work.

[Anonymous No.3622768]