/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.3428607]

>He wants to paint like Rei

Phew anon.. what's your excuse for not pursuing the purest of art styles?

[Anonymous No.3428610]

I'm busy studying realism. I also am not sure I want to have this style as my own when Rei already exists. I would just be an inferior copy.

[Anonymous No.3428612]

>>3428607
>p-pedo shit cookie cutter weeb animay crap!

[Anonymous No.3428616]

>absolute clothing porn

[Anonymous No.3429104]

>>3428616
LMAO, the length of that arm.
More like absolute polished turd.

[Anonymous No.3429242]

>>3428607

>remaking Millais/Pre-raphaelite Ophelia, but with Tohou shit

Absolutely disgusting, 0/10, apply yourself

[Anonymous No.3429245]

>>3429242
I was wondering what the influence for these water pieces are. Now I know. Thanks Art History Anon.

[Anonymous No.3429296]

>>3429104
redline it bro

[Anonymous No.3429301]

>>3429242
You're a harsh critic anon

[Anonymous No.3429584]

>>3428607
How can i draw like her anons? It's fucking impossible.

[Anonymous No.3429678]

>>3429296
Do you really need a redline to be able to tell that arm is fucked up?

[Anonymous No.3429681]

>>3429584
Years of drawing experience and years of studying.

[Anonymous No.3429897]

>>3429678
Yes, please enlighten us. I mean, surely you KNOW what you're talking about and not just pulling shit out your ass, right?

[Anonymous No.3430177]

>>3429897
I know what I'm talking about yeah. And since you can't tell that shoulder and arm are both misplaced, I'm not going to waste my time with you, scrub.

[Anonymous No.3430204]

>>3430177
Babby can't defend his opinion despite being given every chance to do so, can't say I didn't expect it

[Anonymous No.3430390]

>>3430204
Don't call people with better critical eyes than you, babies, you moron.

[Anonymous No.3431142]

>>3430390
>spent the time writing 4 replies
>still can't back up his argument with a one minute redline

Ngmi

[Anonymous No.3431151]

>>3428607
I dunno anon, what's your excuse for posting on 4chan instead of drawing?

[Anonymous No.3431236]

>>3430390
not that anon.. but being this much of a samefag just to "prove" your own point

phew

according to the water level, looks like her right arm is at a deeper level than her left, while still going slightly upwards on an angle. This can easily be explained by having the character slightly rotated/sunken towards the right, which the angle of the head kinda points at. According to the shoulders, the left one is protruding slightly more out of the water than the right one,which pretty much proves the point; although the chest are could have been slightly more tilted.

It's a nice piece, not sure why you don't like it.

[Anonymous No.3431258]

>>3431236
>samefag
Not even trying to hide I was the one replying each time. WTF?
If everyone here is so stupid, then I'm not surprised you guys can't notice obvious glaring flaws in artworks.
>according to the water level
Let me stop you right there LMAO.
I was talking about this pic >>3428616
Again, awesome rendering, awful proportions and foreshortening.

[Anonymous No.3431261]

>>3431142
Already made it.
You can KYS
BABBY

[Anonymous No.3431273]

>>3431236
>>3431142

also, since you morons still can't seem to figure this out for yourself, I will be the bigger man and give you the redline you so desperately begged for.

This is just a quick redline so don't give me any shit about it

[Anonymous No.3431279]

>>3431273
with comments in case you STILL can't tell what's wrong with it

[Anonymous No.3431283]

>>3431273
how you managed to fuck up tracing I will never know
look at his elbow

[Anonymous No.3431292]

>>3431283
I literally told you not ti give any shit it's just a quick redline to point out the mistakes of the painting. are you blind or something?

[Anonymous No.3431299]

>>3431292
well, considering you were talking about the arms, I'm amazed you didn't bother to get that part right
fuck your "quick" redlines, garbage is garbage

[Anonymous No.3431495]

>>3431292
translation:im not good enough to correctly redline so heres my best effort and ill just say i didnt care even though i totally cared enough to try to prove it in the first place

[Anonymous No.3431903]

>>3431273
>>3431279
>Can't even redline right
Fucking lmao

[Anonymous No.3431912]

>>3431292
>quick redline
Is this the new meme?

[Anonymous No.3431917]

>>3429584
She's been constantly drawing for a long time now and from what I've seen of her style she's been painting the same way for the past ~5 years. Grind and study the right things.

Study the masters like Loomis, Bridgeman, Hogarth, etc. and you should be able to make it.

[Anonymous No.3431924]

>>3431917
It's a shame she doesn't have much tutorials, i would sell my first born for them.

[Anonymous No.3431926]

>>3431279
>>3431273

[Anonymous No.3431927]

>>3431924
You got a name, anon? You drawing? You should focus on it.

[Anonymous No.3431937]

>>3431279

You are the same guy that made these >>3431037, right? And you are probably just trolling, right?
If not, I cannot for the life of me explain why would there be so many people doing terrible red lines of great art.

[Anonymous No.3431938]

>>3429584
Try realism for like a year and after that, go back into anime. In little time you'll be even better, if you got the fundies of realism...

[Anonymous No.3431940]

>>3431937
C-crabs are everywhere...

[Anonymous No.3431948]

>>3431927
Yeah but i only have a few followers, been drawing for almost 4 years now.
My line works are okay buy my rendering still sucks dick.

[Anonymous No.3431951]

>>3431948
What do you mean by that exactly? Do you draw full blown illustrations before rendering them and just can't get good lighting in? Or what are we talking about here?

[Anonymous No.3431960]

>>3431951
It's more about don't know how to render objects and which color should i use, especially hairs, it's so fucking confusing.
Also Rei's works usually have very thin lines or none at all so i don't know if she paint over or just draw very thin lines.
Pic related is one of my wip that i discarded because i hate it.

[Anonymous No.3431967]

>>3431960
That looks quite appealing.

[Anonymous No.3432034]

>>3431495
Not even the same person. The anon that did that shitty redline wasn't me.
That redline is shit, as it doesn't fix anything, all it does is that it points out how the anatomy looks right now. It looks like shit.

[Anonymous No.3432038]

>>3431258

>awful proportions and foreshortening.

shitting on animu... post your perfection specialist...

[Anonymous No.3432044]

>>3432034
>gets his retarded redline shit on as it should be
>uuuuuuhhhh akshually it wasn't me!

we're reaching damage control levels that shouldn't even be possible

[Anonymous No.3433675]

>>3432044
LMAO. Keep crying, scrub.

[Anonymous No.3433851]

>>3431273
>being this autistic

phew anon..

[Anonymous No.3434064]

>>3433851
That redline is shit cause it doesn't fix aynthing, but it unironically shows how deformed the underlying anatomy is. Clothing and rendering porn, sure. But awful anatomy and foreshortening underneath.

tl;dr POLISHED TURD

[Anonymous No.3434071]

>>3428607
stop pan-asian rip-off culture

[Anonymous No.3436184]

Posting some of her process stuff.

[Anonymous No.3436185]

>>3436184

[Anonymous No.3436188]

>>3436185

[Anonymous No.3436190]

>>3436188

[Anonymous No.3436191]

>>3436190
I'll be doing an in depth study of her work soon, I'll post my notes if anyone would like them when I'm done.

[Anonymous No.3436241]

>>3431279
>>3431273
dumb faggot
it goes like this

[Anonymous No.3436243]

why do so many of these start with a flat gray on the subject before adding color?

[Anonymous No.3436246]

>>3436243
It's to make a clipping mask.

[Anonymous No.3436249]

>>3436246
ohhhh. thank you.

[Anonymous No.3436254]

>>3436246
w-what is a clipping mask?

[Anonymous No.3436275]

>>3436254
Anything you paint/draw/etc inside the clipping mask stays within the clipping mask, so you don't need to waste erasing any excess.


It's extremely important and basic that you know this. It's one of the most useful things in digital.

[Anonymous No.3436296]

>>3436275
even when you explain it, I still don't understand what it does or how to use it
I've used photoshop for +5 years and I hear peopel all the time using clipping mask but I'm just too brainlet to understand its use

[Anonymous No.3436302]

>>3436296
It's basically a background that you can make whatever shape and can't paint outside of.

[Anonymous No.3436317]

>>3436302
So just like a layer with "Lock transparent pixels" on it?

[Anonymous No.3436326]

>>3436317
Yeah.

[Anonymous No.3436330]

>>3436184
>>3436185
>>3436188
>>3436190
>>3436191
Woah shit thanks dude, i need this, gonna study her render after i finish my line work.

[Anonymous No.3436338]

>>3436241
You suck just as much as that other guy, ffs.

[Anonymous No.3436370]

>>3436330
I have a bit more but it's not as "step by step" it just shows her layering process

[Anonymous No.3436411]

>>3436370
Does SAI bursh tools the same as CSP? I don't know if i can replicate her brush in CSP, i hate using SAI.

[Anonymous No.3436782]

>>3436411
I don't use csp so I don't know, but just study how she does edges and I'm sure you can emulate the look in any program.

[Anonymous No.3436818]

>>3431273
>hurr i dont understand shoulder anatomy so it must be wrong

>>3436241
thanks anon

[Anonymous No.3436819]

>>3436411
You can almost replicate it 1:1, but there are certain aspects like Brush Density that can't perfectly match SAI's behaviour sadly. But imo it's not that big of a deal

[Anonymous No.3436825]

>>3436818
>thanks anon
The anatomy is still wrong. The only way you can defend that bad anatomy is by spouting muh style. And I'm pretty sure you know that's BS.
Anyway, the more I look at this artist's stuff the more I see it's all polished turds.

[Anonymous No.3436829]

stop sharing your favorite artists with /ic/ degenerates
nothing good comes from it besides shitposting fuel

[Anonymous No.3436831]

>>3436411
no
>http://sai.detstwo.com/forum/index.php/topic,2316.0.html

[Anonymous No.3436834]

>>3436825
embarrassing, anon
>>3431037
>>3431053
>>3430929

[Anonymous No.3436837]

>>3436831
Wow thanks for the link, i never dive into brush custom thing because i'm too lazy and only use standard stuffs so all of this is kinda confusing.

[Anonymous No.3437028]

>>3436819
hm there are certains ones that do it almost the same, but csp brushes are super lagging compared to sai, especially when using big brush size

[Anonymous No.3437031]

>>3436191
of course anon, if you are who I think you are, you know your shit. Would love to delve deeper

[Anonymous No.3437048]

>>3436834
You just added more turds on the pile.
If you can't see how this stuff is all polished turds, I suggest you to KYS.

[Anonymous No.3437405]

>>3436190
How does the sketch layer get (mostly) removed between the 5th and 6th step?

[Anonymous No.3437410]

>>3437405
they're probably just painting over it.

[Anonymous No.3437413]

>>3437410
But that's tedious!

[Anonymous No.3437429]

>>3436317
there's benefits to using clipping masks over just locking layer transparency but I haven't used photoshop in awhile so I don't really remember (I learned it and promptly forgot it)

[Anonymous No.3437627]

>>3436191
Yes please.

[Anonymous No.3437650]

>>3437031
No I'm a lurker this is my first time posting sorry.

>>3437405
Since she uses sai she probably blends it in and paints over it on a new layer/draws in new lines where needed. In PS when I emulate it I just paint over and draw lines over that because ps brushes aren't "wet" like sai brushes.

[Anonymous No.3437662]

>>3436370
So she only sketch a simple picture and then goes straight for coloring, use brush to details it again huh.
Fuck, guess i have to relearn my process, i usually line a complete picture and then start coloring.

[Anonymous No.3437703]

>>3436190
still to this day upset at how much of a pussy chuliann is in fate

[Anonymous No.3437769]

>>3437662
Depending on the sort of finished result you want either way is fine. If you like doing lots of neat little linework like crosshatching or (as I do) lots of detail on the hair and eyelashes complete lining may suit your needs. But it is good to experiment.

[Anonymous No.3437905]

>>3437429
hm really? I didn't know that. I think if you use clipping mask and your base under it isn't at 100% opacity, then when you pick colors, they will always be a value brighter than the one you picked.

[Anonymous No.3437907]

>>3437650
not at all, feel free to share your thoughts

[Anonymous No.3438271]

>>3436184
What is that chink letter in the second brush mean??? Spread or Bristle?

[Anonymous No.3438533]

>>3438271
i dont know chinese but 細市, 勾辺
seems like a fine brush and an angled flat?

[Anonymous No.3440687]

>>3436184
>>3436185
>>3436188
>>3436190
>>3436191
>>3436370
You're godsend anon, bless