/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.3238563]

Hi everyone, I need proof this board isn't a meme and that you all are actually drawing and qualified to give critique & advice for this field.

Can at least one of you post some good art to prove that loomis isn't a meme and that the sticky isn't a joke? The art has to be yours, and you have to mention if it was really IC that helped you, or if you reached that level by avoiding the suggested advice on this board.

I am just not certain because people keep posting art that's not theirs and you're all anonymous so that doesn't help. I am just asking for proof is all, I need to know if you're all just cons sending people down the wrong path.

[Anonymous No.3238601]

>>3238563
Loomis just means study your fundamentals you fucking retard. Literally go message any skilled artist on youtube and they will tell you that they studied perspective, anatomy, values etc. You don't need to study loomis, loomis is simply one of many books that teaches that. You can learn it from bridgema, hampton, scott robertson, it doesn't really matter as long as you're learning it.

[Anonymous No.3238606]

>>3238563
sure man, here you go

[Anonymous No.3238626]

Norman Rockwell endorsed Loomis.

[Anonymous No.3238632]

>>3238606
I did reverse google image search, not yours.

>>3238626
He can't draw anime though.
>>3238601
No, that's not Loomis. Loomis did not invent this shit.

[Derek No.3238634]

>>3238632
Jace posts here, newfag.

[Anonymous No.3238635]

>>3238626
Terrific example, really shows what you can achieve with some loomis

[Anonymous No.3238638]

>>3238632
>Loomis did not invent this shit.
>>3238601
>You don't need to study loomis, loomis is simply one of many books that teaches that.
Did you not read past the first sentence?

[Anonymous No.3238640]

>>3238635
Repin draw this from life models...
horrible...

[Anonymous No.3238647]

>>3238640
>directly referencing a photo is the same as drawing from a live model
Do you even draw?

[Anonymous No.3238649]

>>3238640
Yeah, and he didn’t loomis it up, either, so what’s your point?

[Anonymous No.3238651]

>>3238647
Yes. There is no big difference.

[Anonymous No.3238652]

>>3238640
>>3238626
These are the types of people who are trying to give advice and tell us how to draw our waifu's? LOL

[Anonymous No.3238655]

>>3238649
>Repin
>not loomis it up
Repin is from Imperial Academy of Arts. Do you know what Imperial Academy of Arts is?

[Anonymous No.3238658]

>>3238649
If you want to know what Andrew Loomis methods can achieve, you should check out this one guy, you know, he goes by the name "Andrew Loomis"

[Anonymous No.3238661]

>>3238655
How about you quit posting garbage and show us something like pic-related. Loomis is never going to make you as good as Murata.

[Anonymous No.3238668]

>>3238655
>Russian academics
>construction
Back to /beg/

[Anonymous No.3238673]

>>3238661

[Anonymous No.3238679]

>>3238668

[Anonymous No.3238692]

>>3238679
>mapping out planes for lightning on an already finished drawing
>construction
seriously, go back to /beg/

[Anonymous No.3238708]

>>3238692
...

[Anonymous No.3238718]

>>3238673
Apparently drawing anime human's to have human features counts as loomis? Quit riding his dick. If I give a character 2 eyes, does that make it loomis? If I give a girl tits, does that make it loomis?

[Anonymous No.3238721]

>>3238692

[fucking saged No.3238722]

>>3238692
>bait this bad
you have to try harder than that anon

[Anonymous No.3238723]

>>3238708
To be fair, art styles like that are archaic and are NGMI in the industry. No one wants to see old realistic turds. They want Murata-tier not women with stretch marks.

[Anonymous No.3238726]

>>3238658
This
Look at these titties

[Anonymous No.3238732]

>>3238563
Type "Pr34@iestrap", just remove the "34@".

[Anonymous No.3238734]

>>3238721
>having a 353x500 pixel page scan on your computer
Is this what being retarded is like?

[Anonymous No.3238735]

>>3238726
Still uglier than an anime girl.

[Anonymous No.3238743]

>>3238732
Actually, type in Pr34@iestap, just remove the "34@" and post. It gets you banned on 4chan.

[Anonymous No.3238744]

>>3238635
Yeah

[Anonymous No.3238747]

>>3238734
Woah. Nice comeback.

[Anonymous No.3238751]

>>3238732
>>3238743

priestrap
priestap
did it work?

[Anonymous No.3238752]

>>3238723
Cool story.

[Anonymous No.3238756]

>>3238752
You missed the part where it says for $5/hr, meanwhile Sakimichan makes over half a million a year.

[Anonymous No.3238758]

>>3238752
>avid and passionate gamer

[Anonymous No.3238762]

>>3238756
>Sakimichan out of nowhere
what the fuck are you talking about

[Anonymous No.3238764]

>>3238762
Realistic art is archaic garbage that you can't make a living off of. Loomis is dead and no one wants old wrinkly men & women.

You'll be in poverty if you don't draw more modern art like anime & disney level of toons.

[Anonymous No.3238766]

>>3238751
They fixed it quickly then.

[Anonymous No.3238773]

>>3238764
>Realistic art is archaic garbage that you can't make a living off of.
Last (You).

[Anonymous No.3239570]

>>3238735
Alright you lil shit, I'm not that guy, but here's an upgraded anime style for (you)