Ishida Sui Art

[Anonymous No.3237118]

What's /ic/'s opinion on Ishida Sui's art?

Personally one of my favs

[Anonymous No.3237135]

>>3237118
meh, looks like poop

[Anonymous No.3237138]

>>3237135
How so?

[Anonymous No.3237162]

>>3237138

don't mind that salty individual

It looks appealing, he has a sense for color, balance and "feels", like many jp pro's. Reminds me of Lords of Vermillion art, in case he worked on it.

[Anonymous No.3237369]

>>3237118
It’s kinda airy, and I love it. He uses almost minimal shading, but it gets the point across. You should post more of his art tho, there’s something to be said about consistency

[Anonymous No.3237372]

shit anatomy
shit colors
trash

[Anonymous No.3237374]

>>3237118
Not funny, no titties... don't really care. Looks like generic art to me.

[Anonymous No.3237522]

>>3237162
I agree with you there
>>3237369
Will post more, also agree with this. I like how "light" but defined it is.
>>3237374
Will include titties

[Anonymous No.3237526]

[Anonymous No.3237529]

[Anonymous No.3237530]

[Anonymous No.3237541]

only thing good is his colors and his rendering style (which is pretty much just preliminary painting)
>>3237522
you shouldnt have used this image if you wanted anyone to think he was good

[Anonymous No.3237545]

>>3237541
Not trying to say he's good, just providing art of his for opinions.

[Anonymous No.3237654]

>>3237522
I'm unsatisfied with the titties.

I believe he's got the technique and the experience, but there are thousands of artists like him. He doesn't strike a chord with me. I like art in hardcore fetish porn and funnies. This is neither, so idc. That's my opinion on Ishida Sui's art.

[Anonymous No.3237664]

eastern art is trash. fuck off back to /a/

[Anonymous No.3237682]

I really like his art, specialy the colors and the strokes it have something really appealing unlike most of generic manga artist
>>3237118#
Love that one

[Anonymous No.3237713]

>>3237374#
Whats your idea of non generic art?

[Anonymous No.3237758]

Makes wlop looks like a rendering freak

[Anonymous No.3237764]

>>3237118
its full of personality. i like it.

[Anonymous No.3237768]

>>3237118
In terms of the actual art you see in his comics, he peaked out around the Aogiri arc, got mediocre towards the end of Tokyo Ghoul, and when Tokyo Ghoul :re starts his art just slowly declines into a plateau. Really he's sticking in his comfort zone.

You can see this in all the volume covers, where early on there are full body drawings and some different angles it was drawn from. But then later you see that the covers become more of the same. And it :re it's always some kind of bust shot of a character. Usually a head, and one hand. Or it's just a head. No difficult things like perspective, form or construction here! Just floaty wispy whatever you see, like in OP. The comic of course, follows.

It becomes more polished, but it stiffens up a lot and looses some of its uniqueness to it. If you've read Bleach, it's kind of the same shit. But at least Kubo (bleh) had his own uniquely awful style. Ishida's just looks like your average anime. Doesn't help that most of the impressive stuff later on is work that could easily have been delegated to assistants, like background art or screentone effects. Hell even the really nice looking background art could easily just have been filtered photos of Tokyo.

[Anonymous No.3237945]

>>3237118
He's a phenomenal artist but of course /ic/ will shit on him.

[Anonymous No.3239204]

He makes cool stuff.

[Anonymous No.3239436]

/ic/ confirmed for edgy preteens

gotta be 18 years old to post kiddos

[Anonymous No.3240728]

Honestly ishida was pretty 'meh' to me during first season of tokyo ghoul but it was in the season 2 credits where I actually started digging his style.
Give the video a watch. Honestly I only watched the season 2 just to understand the ending cards (each episode had different credit illustrations about the episode). Good stuff.

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=l28ujx_d0Ys