Quantcast
[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / g / ic / jp / lit / sci / tg / vr ] [ index / top / reports / report a bug ] [ 4plebs / archived.moe / rbt ]

2017/01/28: An issue regarding the front page of /jp/ has been fixed. Also, thanks to all who contacted us about sponsorship.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

[ Toggle deleted replies ]
File: 1.50 MB, 2146x1508, The art of a hack.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
2864825 No.2864825 [Reply] [Original]

Why is this allowed?

>> No.2864829

>>2864825
sauce on second pic?
looks interesting

>> No.2864832
File: 29 KB, 400x283, Staccato.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
2864832

Wow, such a hack. I can't believe they used a common trick deployed for decades in different mediums.

>> No.2864834
File: 64 KB, 500x375, shat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] [report]
2864834

>>2864825

>> No.2864836

>>2864829

http://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?mode=medium&illust_id=56996328

>> No.2864837

>>2864825
You're reaching OP. this is a simple, real light trick that wasn't invented by the artist on the right.

>> No.2864844

>>2864837
They could be unrelated, but I kinda see where OP is coming from, one uses the light trick creatively, making a compelling piece to go with it, the other just slaps it onto the sameface they've drawn over and over again.

>> No.2864870

>>2864825
the artist of the right pic is much better

>> No.2864898

>>2864844
Ok. So there's uncreative people doing digital art and creative people doing digital art.
Does that need a thread?

>> No.2864900

>>2864825
>from interesting style to generic abomination

>> No.2864909

>>2864825
I don't understand the question.

>>
Name (leave empty)
Comment (leave empty)
Name
E-mail
Subject
Comment
Password [?]Password used for file deletion.
reCAPTCHA
Action