Nice high quality art thread

[Anonymous No.2803678]

Post art that you like and it's "good".

[Anonymous No.2803679]

[Anonymous No.2803680]

[Anonymous No.2803683]

[Anonymous No.2803687]

[Anonymous No.2803693]

[Anonymous No.2803695]

[Anonymous No.2803698]

[Anonymous No.2803700]

[Anonymous No.2803701]

>>2803679
whos the artist? I like it, cant read the signature.

[Anonymous No.2803702]

>>2803701
Says Jan van Beers.

[Anonymous No.2803707]

[Anonymous No.2803714]

>>2803702

[Anonymous No.2803773]

[Anonymous No.2803800]

[Anonymous No.2803817]

>>2803687
>>2803707
>>2803800
complete shit

[Anonymous No.2803819]

>>2803817
(you)

[Anonymous No.2803820]

>>2803817
kinda true.

[Anonymous No.2803821]

>>2803819
even with passable rendering those pieces look very shallow and unnatural.

[Anonymous No.2803825]

>>2803817
Post yours faggot

[Anonymous No.2803877]

>>2803678
>all those messy edges
I thought you said quality art

[Anonymous No.2803878]

>>2803817
Instead of whining why don't you post something you consider quality?

[Anonymous No.2803893]

>>2803877

>if it doesnt look like its painted by algenpfleger its shit

[Anonymous No.2803946]

>>2803678

[Anonymous No.2803950]

>>2803678
Why is there a circle on her cleavage?

[Anonymous No.2803952]

[Anonymous No.2803972]

>>2803950
it's called a boob window

[Anonymous No.2803991]

[Anonymous No.2803999]

>>2803946
>>2803952
The autistic anime fags are here

[Anonymous No.2804003]

>>2803817
I gotta agree in parts with that about those:

>>2803707
>>2803800


Those are far from being shit, but compared to really high level stuff they feel very unnatural and lifeless, like the artists tried way too hard to make lots of details and lost the spontaneity.

[Anonymous No.2804009]

this and......

[Anonymous No.2804010]

>>2804009
....this

[Anonymous No.2804014]

>>2803946
>>2803952
Come on son, I get it's 4chan kek and all that.
Dont shit up the thread with obvious troll posting

[Anonymous No.2804015]

[Anonymous No.2804017]

>>2803877
why is /ic/ so fucking full of tryhard dweebs

[Anonymous No.2804018]

[Anonymous No.2804020]

[Anonymous No.2804021]

[Anonymous No.2804022]

[Anonymous No.2804034]

[Anonymous No.2804036]

>>2804014

[Anonymous No.2804040]

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=j2y-GFJq2qA

[Anonymous No.2804043]

>>2804022
wow

[Anonymous No.2804054]

[Anonymous No.2804062]

Roberto Ferri.

[Anonymous No.2804078]

>>2803893
>>2804017
lol ok

[Anonymous No.2804406]

[Anonymous No.2804422]

>>2804010
oh boy

[Anonymous No.2804430]

>>2803952
go and suck kyles dick if you want but dont do it in this thread. yikes.

[Anonymous No.2804481]

>>2804430
nice snow

[Anonymous No.2804488]

>>2804406
is that Saturn?

[Anonymous No.2804759]

[Anonymous No.2804780]

[Anonymous No.2804782]

[Anonymous No.2804783]

[Anonymous No.2804786]

[Anonymous No.2804788]

[Anonymous No.2804789]

[Anonymous No.2804791]

[Anonymous No.2804793]

[Anonymous No.2804797]

[Anonymous No.2804803]

>>2803773
Really like that one too, it's scary how good his values are.

[Anonymous No.2804856]

[Anonymous No.2804860]

>>2804856

[Anonymous No.2804864]

>>2804860

[Anonymous No.2804889]

daily remined digital art is not art at all

[Anonymous No.2804930]

>>2804488
Psst... Paradise lost

[Anonymous No.2804955]

>>2804481
not sure if a joke or not

[Anonymous No.2804967]

>>2804860

outies are so gross

[Anonymous No.2805010]

>>2804889
daily reminder.

you're a fucking retard.

[Anonymous No.2805050]

[Anonymous No.2805112]

>>2803972
moar boob windows

[Anonymous No.2805586]

[Anonymous No.2805930]

[Anonymous No.2805931]

[Anonymous No.2805971]

[Anonymous No.2806001]

>>2803680
>>2803679
If only these artist had access to actually beautiful models...

[Anonymous No.2806089]

>>2803678
Meet my senpai

[Anonymous No.2806219]

>>2804036
Clownpiece a true a merican hero

[Anonymous No.2806854]

>>2803678

[Anonymous No.2806877]

[Anonymous No.2806913]

>>2803678
>>2806854
op's one is more interesting

[Anonymous No.2806916]

>>2804020
more like this?

[Anonymous No.2806934]

[Anonymous No.2806935]

>>2803877
You tryna say Karla cant draw?

[Anonymous No.2806939]

[Anonymous No.2806940]

by rogner5th.

[Anonymous No.2806941]

>>2804430
I want to eat that foam
and those rocks too actually

[Anonymous No.2806947]

>>2806001
beauty is in the eye of the beholder

[Anonymous No.2806953]

>>2806001

[Anonymous No.2806954]

>>2806947
C'mon anon. We are artists
Are you gonna tell me you don't think there is objective beauty?

[Anonymous No.2806956]

>>2806947
>>2806954

Beauty is both objective and subjective.

[Anonymous No.2806957]

>>2806956
you are not as smart as you think you are.

[Anonymous No.2806968]

>>2806957

There is such a thing as objective beauty because it is tied to our biology. We have always found symmetry and certain facial relationships attractive. At the same time there is also the aspect of cultural variation where certain aspects such as big behinds are more praised in certain areas. There is no conflict between these two. If you think beauty is completely arbitrary you are brain washed by post modernism.

[Anonymous No.2806974]

>>2804010
Love food art.

[Anonymous No.2806978]

>>2803678
all of that effort to paint a girl that isn't attractive.
fucking lol that's what you get for needing a model to paint a face.

[Anonymous No.2806980]

>>2806968

Either certain object can be structurally appealing to the human mind, and are in that sense objectively beautiful. That assumes that humans are pretty similarly wired and thus like similar stuff.

or

beauty is social construct and as such subjective.

It cannot be in the same sense objective and subjective because those terms are exclusive of one another. We might have 2 different concepts of beauty, one cultural and one "biological" but that doesnt mean the same concept is at the same time objective and subjective.

I feel stupid for arguing on 4chin about the semantic of aesthetics. Btw, I am not the "beauty lies in the eye of the beholder" idiot

[Anonymous No.2806985]

>>2806980
>social construct
Getting tired of hearing that word

[Anonymous No.2806989]

>>2806980
>I was only pretending to be sexy and gorgeous

[Anonymous No.2807000]

>>2806980

Think of it like food. There are cultural variations and people have different preferences but there is still a logic to why certain foods are generally perceived to be better tasting than others. Nothing is purely nature or nurture.

[Anonymous No.2807012]

>>2807000
my point is that nature and nurture bring about 2 different concepts of beauty, no one concept that is both objective and subjective.

[Anonymous No.2807015]

>>2806980

Sure, empirically speaking there are aspects of what we think of as beautiful that are culturally determined, but whether or not you believe beauty as a concept can be reduced to those things is a metaphysical question.

Beauty relates to our structuring of the world into what is and isn't true true or right. Something is seen as beautiful either because we feel instinctively that it expresses a truth, or that it portrays an ideal of how things ought to be. The question whether or not beauty is subjective essencially boils down to whether you believe that true/false and right/wrong are social constructs, which is to say, whether you believe in an objective or a subjective reality.

[Anonymous No.2807017]

>>2806947
R-really?

[Anonymous No.2807024]

>>2807015
>Something is seen as beautiful either because we feel instinctively that it expresses a truth, or that it portrays an ideal of how things ought to be

Whether something is beautiful and whether it appeals to us aesthetically has not necessarily something to do with deeper "truth" or meaning.

I would argue we don't know why something appeals to us, we try to rationalize and make up reasons after the fact, but at no point can one know for certain why they like a certain painting.
Kant said (roughly) that the structure of the object in question in some sense appeals to the structure of the human mind and that this constitutes beauty. That seems reasonable for me. What in the structure however exactly is appealing to me, I have no idea.

[Anonymous No.2807026]

>>2807017

[Anonymous No.2807042]

>>2807024
Kant had some important insights, but his philosophy falls apart the moment he tries to make the leap from analytically-descriptive to analytically-creative. His concept of ethics is just as flawed as his aesthetics, and Schopenhauers critique of Kants conception of space and time, which seems pretty spot on to me, shows that these problems already exist in his metaphysics.

Your comment also reminded me that this video exists:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7M-cmNdiFuI

[Anonymous No.2807047]

>>2807042
Yea, all in all, Kant just doesnt work, nobody is disputing that. I was trying to reconstruct some of his good points. This idea that beauty is, how the structure of the thing appeals to our structure as humans for example sounds, though not all that useful, reasonable to me.

[Anonymous No.2807112]

>>2804009
not to comment on the painting, but i've sometimes noticed these colors on the edge of some shadows, rarely, but I did, what causes it ? is it just the edge of the shirt that let some light pass through or something ?

[Anonymous No.2807207]

>>2806940
those characters are too close, it feels so out of place

[Anonymous No.2807230]

>>2806916

[Anonymous No.2807316]

[Anonymous No.2807343]

>>2803678
This isn't that good at all. There seems to be little understanding of structure, it's a mess. wtf is with her boobs?? It's literally just a thin line.

[Anonymous No.2807365]

>>2807112
Subsurface scattering, the light kind spreads out under the skin and makes that glow, usually orange and more visible in ears and nose, leaves and other thin surfaces.
kinda like it does on the ear
Pic related

[Anonymous No.2807429]

>>2806854
What the fuck.

[Anonymous No.2807431]

>>2807429

He applied the kr0n filter

[Anonymous No.2807447]

>>2807431
Who's that kr0n guy and how do we make him stop doing this ?

[Anonymous No.2807456]

>>2807365
>>2807112
That is not subsurface scattering. That happens when light passes through an object or diffuses inside an object that is not opaque. Skin is pink because of subsurface scattering but this is not it.

This follows the edge of the shadow, and its not because of the surface. If you have a strong directional light you get those cast shadows. Everything not in the shadow will be lit more than half tone and get lower saturation, and the shadow also has lower saturation. You can get a stronger saturation along the cast shadow's edge because it's closer to half tone. If the more diffuse the edge becomes the more gradual the gradient becomes. Most of the time you do not notice it strongly at all.

[Anonymous No.2807611]

>>2807456
ah, i see, I wasn't aware :P
I need to study more...

[Anonymous No.2807617]

>>2807447
>>2807429
>>2806854
kr0nz is at it again.....

[Anonymous No.2807634]

>>2807447
Impossible. He has an army of fanbois whose battlecry is "You're just jealous of someone who made it".

[Anonymous No.2807664]

>>2806954
What drives this board's brief moments of intellectual regression?

[Anonymous No.2807694]

[Anonymous No.2807695]

>>2807694
Is she fucking grinding on him lol

[Anonymous No.2807696]

>>2807694
xD

[Anonymous No.2808128]

[Anonymous No.2808147]

>>2808128
MOAR

[Anonymous No.2808152]

>>2806935
no. Im saying she cant paint.

[Anonymous No.2808307]

>>2808152

Dunning-Kruger is one hell of a drug

[Anonymous No.2808325]

>>2807456
>>2807611
i am 100% sure that it its not light diffusing through a non-opaque object

diffusion is the spreading of light due to a non-even/flat surface, e.g. a matte surface

this however is due to diffraction of light. since light has wave properties due to the wave/particle duality, light bends around corners or edges. an example would be how you can see light from the sun around the corner of a building even though the actual sun is not in front of you.

as such, the light shown on the skin pigment has a high saturation and it looks more 'burnt'

[Anonymous No.2808363]

>>2808325
Back to /sci/, stemlord.

[Anonymous No.2808379]

>>2808363
back to 19th century, shitbrain

[Anonymous No.2808390]

>>2807694
god, this is just fucking ugly.

[Anonymous No.2808564]

[Anonymous No.2809062]

>>2803695
so much anatomy edited out by the artist. her arms don't connect to the torso in any meaningful way. lovely colors though.

[Anonymous No.2809088]

>>2804062
amazing.

[Anonymous No.2809090]

>>2809062

You are a woman, right?
It's always the women who feel the need to nitpick whenever someone paints a attractive female figure

btw the arms connect just fine to the torso.

[Anonymous No.2809116]

>>2807694
what is wrong with sycra

[Anonymous No.2809118]

>>2806939
i love kolesov so fuckin much man fuck how is he allowed to be this level of god tier fucking kill me

[Anonymous No.2809123]

>>2806089
this guy had an oc drawing contest once
i submitted something, even. when i look back on it it looked pretty bad but it was fun.
this guys rendering is fucking insane.

[Anonymous No.2809184]

>>2803695
artist? this is stunning

[Anonymous No.2809187]

>>2804062
mastery on 100

[Anonymous No.2809188]

>>2809184

Loomis

[Anonymous No.2809190]

>>2809062
>meaningful way
What bunch of nonsensical wording.

They connect just fine, the artist just simply didn't define the shoulders for whatever reason.

[Anonymous No.2809307]

[Anonymous No.2809397]

>>2804062
her right leg ruins it

[Anonymous No.2809455]

>>2807207
what a stupid complaint lmao

[Anonymous No.2809456]

>>2809307
Fuck how do i draw soft skin like this

[Anonymous No.2809496]

>>2806877
Link?

[Anonymous No.2809755]

>>2809397
shut the fuck up, you cant draw and will never paint like this man.

[Anonymous No.2809818]

[Anonymous No.2809847]

>>2809818
Does anybody actually know who did this? Picture search only gives me hundreds of wallpaper pages.

[Anonymous No.2809848]

[Anonymous No.2809867]

>>2809847
Andrew "Android" Jones

[Anonymous No.2809907]

>>2808307
except thats not relevant nor a drug

[Anonymous No.2809916]

>>2807365
>>2807456
>>2808325
except its neither. its just a shitty meme and doesnt make any sense. The red tint goes from the leg to the swimming suit, so its not subsurface scattering. it also goes from core shadow and then inverts when it hits the suit. its really just a shitty understanding of what sub surface scattering is and knowing where your shadows are, and that artist obviously knows neither.

[Anonymous No.2809924]

>>2809188
I didn't ask for memes, just tell me his name.

[Anonymous No.2809933]

>>2809848
Normally I don't care for that sort of shit, but that is fairly interesting.

[Anonymous No.2809937]

>>2809916
Personally I would assume it's meant to be light diffracted by the edge of the fabric. Doesn't really make much sense being so exaggerated though, as it's quite a subtle effect in real life.

[Anonymous No.2809958]

>>2809924
It's literally Loomis you dumb fuck. If you spent literally half a second to reverse image search you'd find out.

[Anonymous No.2810007]

what does /ic/ think of simon stalenhag

[Anonymous No.2810016]

>>2810007
stop shilling yourself simon

[Anonymous No.2810058]

>>2809496
Yes

[Anonymous No.2810069]

>>2810007
his new work sucks. when it was just people, cars, mechs, and derelict machinery it was appealing. Now he's all into his "VR is the devil" "stop watching TV" "Technology da wurst" shit...

[Anonymous No.2810148]

>>2809755
fuck off ferri, that leg is horrendous and making such claims on an anonymous person is pathetic

[Anonymous No.2810154]

>>2810007

He's very good at cars and ortographic-style perspective, but it gets pushed a bit too hard and appears flat and photograph-like. Colors are always dull, everything kinda gets rendered the same, no vibrancy or stroke variety. I'm a fellow swedecuck btw, and know plenty of folks who worship him, never any distinguished or interesting artsy people, just nerds and gamers

[Anonymous No.2810189]

>>2809307
>tfw local museum has a massive permanent Bougureau painting
>upcoming temporary exhibit is gonna bring in more works of his
I'm ready to metaphorically orgasm in a public space.

[Anonymous No.2810195]

>>2810148
>autism

[Anonymous No.2810209]

>>2810154

Vilket jävla skitsnack, slår vad om att du inte hade vågat snacka sådär om mina målningar irl. Jag gick faktiskt på karate förut så vakta din tunga unge man.
Arg och ledsen
/Simon

[Anonymous No.2810213]

[Anonymous No.2810244]

>>2809933
probably because its representational of a beach scene and not abstract meaningless crap

[Anonymous No.2810274]

>>2809937
>Doesn't really make much sense being so exaggerated though, as it's quite a subtle effect in real life.
w-what?
>>2809916
Why do you people assume artists go for a practice in photorealistic rendering and accordingly fail if it is not that?
The artist exaggerated the effect, because to them, and others too, it is aesthetically pleasing.
And I think this anon described it best >>2807456 , though I don't see how sss is not involved in this. The halftone can only be this saturated because of it.

[Anonymous No.2810409]

[Anonymous No.2810422]

[Anonymous No.2810428]

>>2809848
The direction used to place the dollops of paint makethe waves look backwards which is a shame.

[Anonymous No.2810436]

>>2810409
i love the textures on this, thanks for posting!

[Anonymous No.2810730]

>>2809184
>>2809924
>>2809958
His name is literally in the corner of the fucking painting.

[Anonymous No.2810751]

>>2810730
>tfw it really is Loomis
Wait, he's actually good?

[Anonymous No.2810766]

>>2804020
I would have liked this more if there wasn't a person sitting down in it.

[Anonymous No.2810769]

>>2810766
Way to scare the shit out of me, didn't even realize there was a person in there.

[Anonymous No.2810792]

[Anonymous No.2810797]

[Anonymous No.2810798]

[Anonymous No.2810802]

>>2810798

[Anonymous No.2810804]

[Anonymous No.2810805]

[Anonymous No.2810860]

>>2803698
>>2803700
>>2804021
Very cozy. I like that old English aesthetic.

[Anonymous No.2810864]

>>2810274
>it is aesthetically pleasing.
i said right from the get go that it is a dumb fucking meme. i wasnt being technical about what it is. I just know what its not.

[Anonymous No.2810880]

Can I post Vens work here? I think she's good but I am still too scared to add her on facebook! What should I say to her if she accepts my friend request? Will she think I'm a stalker or creep?

[Anonymous No.2810896]

>>2809118
its not kolesov tho

[Anonymous No.2810897]

>>2806947
>unironically believing this

[Anonymous No.2810898]

>>2809118
Piotr Jablonski
https://www.artstation.com/artwork/E4Ymv

[Anonymous No.2810912]

>>2804009
Source?

[Anonymous No.2811293]

[Anonymous No.2811300]

>>2803678
Soey Milk

[Anonymous No.2811302]

>>2811300
Sergey Kolesov

[Anonymous No.2811307]

>>2811302
Hoooook (five O's)

[Anonymous No.2811474]

>>2811307
looks like tumblr shit

[Anonymous No.2811484]

>>2811474
>tumblr shit
you and i have been visiting very different tumblrs

[Anonymous No.2811511]

>>2811307
Ok just a quick question are these done in greyscale then colored on top of? Anyoneknow?

[Anonymous No.2811537]

>>2811307
i started following this guy on instagram when he was doing a lot of stuff in ballpoint pen
pretty cool stuff

[Anonymous No.2811545]

>>2811511
Judging by the visible distinct brushstrokes on the edges, I don't think it was done completely in black and white and then colored.
I'm familiar with his gallery though and he often posts a lot of different, edited and tweaked versions of one image, so he plays around a lot with blending mode and changing colors.
So it's probably both, direct painting and editing/overlaying here and there.

[Anonymous No.2811559]

>>2811484
tumblr shit is not only red noses and terrible looks

[Anonymous No.2811589]

>>2806940
This looks like a shitty RPG
>Hey Gaijin, wanna buy a sword?

[Anonymous No.2812452]

>>2811307
Does he have a tumblr? Ironic question but its the app I use.

[Anonymous No.2812479]

[Anonymous No.2812495]

>>2810880
Vens stuff is really bad, bland and boring BBB.

[Anonymous No.2813291]

[Anonymous No.2813295]

>>2810897

>dumb alt-right cunt

k

[Anonymous No.2813296]

>>2813295

beksinski

[Anonymous No.2813300]

>>2813296

[Anonymous No.2813301]

>>2813296
b e k s i n k i

[Anonymous No.2813302]

>>2813301
gimi dat

b e k s i n s k i

[Anonymous No.2813304]

>>2813302

[Anonymous No.2813323]

>>2813295
who are you quoting?
What i meant was this kind of thinking encourages justification of low quality artwork as something you "just don't get". Subjective in art is fairly new concept, and didn't really exist pre 20th century, it became merely a toll for galleries to produce artwork with low effort for richest fucker to invest their money in, simply to avoid taxation. But hey I'm just a dumb cunt

[Anonymous No.2813336]

>>2809062
Are you suggesting he should go back to his loomis ?

[Anonymous No.2813497]

>>2812495
Could understand why you think it's boring or bland, but it's not bad.
I don't think it deserves to be in this thread though, even though I think she might be the best or at least one of the best people on /ic/. At least I think she has one of the fastest improvements anyone on this board has ever had.

[Anonymous No.2813506]

>>2806001
>objectivism
welcome to icy

[Anonymous No.2813509]

>>2803877
beginner spotted

[Anonymous No.2813557]

>>2811307
Ilya Kuvshinov tier

[Anonymous No.2813697]

[Anonymous No.2813702]

>>2813323
He was crying deeply about the past masters not choosing 'hot chix bro' for their work.

[Anonymous No.2813754]

>>2810880
Just add her nerd. She lurks /ic/ you know so if anything would make her think you're a creep its these posts you keep making.

[Anonymous No.2813829]

>>2810880
You can't, because she is beginner tier.

[Anonymous No.2813848]

>>2803678

[Anonymous No.2813851]

>>2810797
source?

[Anonymous No.2814589]

[Anonymous No.2814615]

>>2810880
she sucks. I'm gonna add her on Facebook right now though. I'm a total Chad btw. Get rekt.

[Anonymous No.2814786]

>>2806854
Seeing this made me wanna jump off a bridge. please stop doing shit like this.

[Anonymous No.2814853]

>>2804020
hngg thank you

[Anonymous No.2814856]

>>2806854

poor karla..

[Anonymous No.2814884]

>>2810880
I didn't get a request from you? Please don't just post my art on /ic/ like this. I appreciate you like it, but it's a bit embarrassing to have it compared to actual professional artists.

>>2812495
Well, yeah my stuff is pretty bad, but I'm trying and I'll get better, hopefully your opinion will change then :).

>>2813497
Aww thanks man, but I'm nowhere near one of the best people on the board.

>>2814615
Yeah I suck, you didn't add me either though. Not sure what you are trying to say or do?

[Anonymous No.2814929]

>>2814884
fuck off whore

[Anonymous No.2814962]

>>2814884
aint noone got time to request your trash art slut

[Anonymous No.2815352]

>>2806980
Beauty is subjective because of the diversity of genetics and mutations in our species. The combination is unique for everyone and so everyone uniquely wants to smash whatever is they want to smash

[Anonymous No.2815421]

>>2814884
>this whole post

tumblr would suit you better, go there and never come back, thanks

[Anonymous No.2815547]

>>2807230
Fucking Russians

[Anonymous No.2815661]

>>2815547
look at it as their reward for going through the apocalypse, twice.

[Anonymous No.2815768]

>>2803683

This is beautiful. I'm in awe.

[Anonymous No.2815770]

>>2810213
Please do not post Bob Ross crap...

[Anonymous No.2815773]

[Anonymous No.2815890]

>>2807343
are you... retarded?

[Anonymous No.2815899]

>>2815773
stop

[Anonymous No.2815999]

>>2814929
>>2814962
>>2815421

I don't know, do you want somebody who is not cancer to fuck off just because they are better than you? Have you ever talked to her? Are you jealous because she got good and you haven't yet?

Also where does the idea of requesting art come from?

Just leave her alone. Draw instead of insulting competent artists. Or you can just try chasing away everybody who isn't cancer like you.

[Anonymous No.2816018]

>>2809307
are they trying to drown him

[Anonymous No.2816019]

>>2816018
nah, they want to fuck

[Anonymous No.2816021]

[Anonymous No.2816025]

According to Greek legend there was a famous prostitute called Phryne who managed to avoid a death sentence by showing the judges her boobs and arguing that it would be a crime against the Gods to destroy something so beautiful.

[Anonymous No.2816027]

>>2815999
Nice try girl. Nice projections, i am better than you and I just dont like shilling.

[Anonymous No.2816101]

>>2816018
They're trying to calm his libido by pulling into the water

[Anonymous No.2816124]

>>2816101
Aw, I thought they were going to give him a bath.

[Anonymous No.2816429]

>>2815899

I see nothing wrong with it, looked like a photo from the thumbnail.

[Anonymous No.2816441]

>>2816429
it is a photo. a photo of bad art

[Anonymous No.2816519]

>>2816441

I don't think it's bad art at all. Whoever made it has a good understanding of color splotching. Some of you are pretty senile.

[Anonymous No.2816552]

>>2810189
where the fuck do you live?

[Anonymous No.2816644]

>>2816519
its shit anon.
and apart of me thinks that you made it since you are so pathetically defending a piece of normie shit.
there is nothing good about that painting

>theme: fan art, and the most mainstream overpainted fan art at that. 2/10

>execution/tech: brush strokes are without meaning and life, whilst the pallet is dull and boring, the lighting and tones are just plain shit. its like the artist did not even look at thier own ref image properly (yes i know its reffed because if one has not seen that image of the jokers face in pop culture they are autistic). 2/10

>integrity: none. zero 0/10

>composition: mid mid. literally t-shit tier 3/10

i could go on, its shit, get gud taste, or if you asre the artist, just git gud.

[Anonymous No.2816665]

>>2809116
Proof talent is real
It's called taste.
He literally has some of the worst aesthetic judgment possible

[Anonymous No.2817408]

>>2803991
Lip is that you?

[Anonymous No.2817466]

>>2803678

[Anonymous No.2817551]

>>2817466
Have seen it irl, fantastic painting. Ty for the hires version.

[Anonymous No.2817757]

>>2817551
I gotchu

I'm jelly af though, I have yet to see any of his works in person

[Anonymous No.2817779]

>>2805586
morgan weistling is god

[Anonymous No.2817783]

>>2806947
>booty is in the eye of the beer-holder

gonna make it

[Anonymous No.2817794]

>>2811307
hoooook is god

[Anonymous No.2817798]

does anyone have any really old art that looks like it was made with photoshop?

the only one i can think of is that one sargent piece with the lanterns

[Anonymous No.2818394]

>>2803678
Austrian Art

[Anonymous No.2818398]

>>2818394

[Anonymous No.2818405]

>>2818398
Belgium Art

[Anonymous No.2818407]

>>2818405
More Belgium Art

[Anonymous No.2818409]

>>2818407
That is dramatic

[Anonymous No.2818412]

>>2818409
And a Vanitas Still Life for (YOU)
>>2818407
>>2818405
>>2818398

[Anonymous No.2818413]

>>2818412
Wow, this painting is insane. This is all from imagination?

[Anonymous No.2818418]

>>2818412
The marriage of Cupid and Psyche
Bloemaert, Abraham 1564 - 1651

[Anonymous No.2818422]

>>2818413
The Vanitas style paintings from the early 1600's
They are all allegorical in nature and composition.
Yes insane for sure. Have you studied Pieter Clauesz?

[Anonymous No.2818435]

>>2818422
And El Greco 1541-1614

[Anonymous No.2818440]

>>2818412
Italian Vanitas painting

[Anonymous No.2818447]

>>2818418
John William Waterhouse
Psyche Entering Cupids Gardens

[Anonymous No.2818459]

>>2818447
Hylas and the Nymphs
Another John William Waterhouse piece.

[Anonymous No.2818469]

>>2818447
Jusepe de Ribera 1591-1652
The Duel of Isabella de Carazzi and Diambra de Pottnella

[Anonymous No.2819018]

>>2803698
>>2803700
sauce?

[Anonymous No.2819078]

[Anonymous No.2819158]

>>2819018

>>2803698 joseph zbukvic
>>2803700 russell flint

[Anonymous No.2820957]

>>2806956
>>2806968
>>2806980
Beauty is a spectrum, not a pyramid.
You can argue an apex chink is more beautiful than an apex nigra because you're a filthy weaboo. But neither stops being beautiful because of your preferences.

On the other hand, you cannot argue a deform pre-plastic surgery south korean is more beautiful than an apex african just because you're racist. That's being intellectually dishonest and a shit artist.

[Anonymous No.2820962]

>>2809190
It means the model doesn't have three kilos of arm fat like she does and is driving her mad jelly.

[Anonymous No.2820966]

>>2810751
Well, considering he was contemporary to Gibson, Price and Flagg in his youth, Rockwell, Leyendecker, Dohanos, Hughes and Falter in his prime, and Frazetta in his later years. No. Loomis was irrelevant.

He is actually good by today's art history standards but I'd rather look up to anyone else listed above.

[Anonymous No.2820972]

[Anonymous No.2820978]

>>2819078
is that original size? It's very nice. Is this considered a portrait?