[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]

2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

File: 323 KB, 1280x1364, rangers_on_break.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Anonymous Sat Dec 17 16:38:21 2016 No.2781579 [Reply] [Original]

Why is Shadman considered bad? I've looked at his stuff, and it seems to be well drawn.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 17 16:40:33 2016 No.2781580 File: 53 KB, 720x720, 1471295475161.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2781579 Hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue hue

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 17 16:43:57 2016 No.2781583 File: 71 KB, 482x428, Vulpes_goes_online.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2781580 No really, why is it bad? I'm just wondering for future reference.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 17 16:55:18 2016 No.2781588 >>2781583 If you can't tell then your eye(As in critical eye, not your vision organ) is waaay underdeveloped, not trying to be offensive, you'll be able to tell how bad it looks after you improve a bunch.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 17 16:55:43 2016 No.2781589 >>2781588 pretty much this

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 17 17:13:05 2016 No.2781597 File: 196 KB, 712x679, javik.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2781588 >>2781589 I have the artistic talent of a drunk gorilla. So, can you give me some tips on exactly HOW it's bad?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 17 21:33:30 2016 No.2781841 It's not bad It's not good either. It's ok. There's nothing outstanding about it. But if you really like it, then so be it. Why should /ic/ be the "authority" of which artists to look at?

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 17 21:36:25 2016 No.2781843 >>2781579 Hating Shad is a meme opinion. I think the real reason why some people don't like him is because all his art looks the same after a while. All his characters have the same 3 body types and 4 facial layouts.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 17 21:46:48 2016 No.2781849 File: 8 KB, 480x360, aaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaa.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2781583 because all his art looks like this

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 17 22:24:50 2016 No.2781880 File: 100 KB, 433x419, 1446415360515.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2781849

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 17 22:27:59 2016 No.2781885 >>2781579 His anatomy is quite off sometimes. Still okay in my book.

>>	Sage Sun Dec 18 04:38:54 2016 No.2782161 >>2781579 >Why is Shadman considered bad? Because he is

>>	Anonymous Sun Dec 18 20:12:41 2016 No.2783055 >>2781579 He's a porn artist who couldn't make a sexy image for the life of him

>>	Anonymous Sun Dec 18 20:15:24 2016 No.2783059 >>2781841 Except it is bad.

Anonymous Sun Dec 18 20:21:41 2016 No.2783066

>>2781841

Because this isn't the "art enjoyment" board. This is specifically the art critique board. The implied conversations are of a critic nature. When art is discussed here, it's done critically.

If you want a circle jerk there's /aco/.

>>2781597

If you can't see it for yourself, you literally won't be convinced it's bad. It is bad. Through and through, his artwork is objectively not good.

But you "like" his stuff so it doesn't matter to you if it's bad. Any one can point the flaws out and make a case or argument, but if you don't care either way, which you don't if you "can't see how it's bad", then it doesn't matter.

Anonymous Sun Dec 18 20:31:41 2016 No.2783080

>>2783066

>Makes enfasis in the fact that this is a board where we discuss things critically.
>His argumental is "It's bad because it's bad"

Not defending Shadman here, but common, can you be a little more retarded than this? This just proves that some people on /ic/ just base their opinions on memes and not actual points.

Anonymous Sun Dec 18 20:49:00 2016 No.2783098

>>2783066

>If you can't see it for yourself, you literally won't be convinced it's bad. It is bad. Through and through, his artwork is objectively not good.
>But you "like" his stuff so it doesn't matter to you if it's bad. Any one can point the flaws out and make a case or argument, but if you don't care either way, which you don't if you "can't see how it's bad", then it doesn't matter.

You're pretty good at saying a lot without saying anything at all, anonymous.

>>	Anonymous Sun Dec 18 20:53:50 2016 No.2783105 Shadman is the McDonalds of porn artists

>>	Anonymous Sun Dec 18 21:18:25 2016 No.2783120 >>2781843 this, i believe is just another bandwagon that people jump on with no valid reason or argument so they can fit in

Anonymous Sun Dec 18 21:20:30 2016 No.2783122

>>2783120
>no valid reason
>shit anatomy
>shit, unappealing style
>every girl is just either a big tits whore or a big tits whore with a dick

its pathetic to be a fan of his work, i am disgusted that I have to share this board with such fucking simpletons like yourselves

>>	Anonymous Sun Dec 18 21:26:34 2016 No.2783130 File: 19 KB, 269x200, 11 times.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sun Dec 18 21:27:56 2016 No.2783135 >>2783080 *emphasis And he is bad because his anatomy is trash, his subjects are boring and the rendering is heinous

>>	Anonymous Sun Dec 18 21:30:38 2016 No.2783139 File: 13 KB, 640x640, 1456763309500.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2781849 the rush of nostalgia from this fucking thing

>>	Anonymous Sun Dec 18 21:43:01 2016 No.2783152 >>2783122 >nothing wrong with his cartoon pin up anatomy >opinion >thats the point >implying that i'm a fan

>>	Anonymous Sun Dec 18 21:45:00 2016 No.2783156 i wish the great masters of ic/ that say shadbase is trash would post how it's done, just to shut these guys up

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 21 00:21:28 2016 No.2785651 >>2781849 bruh the nostalgia hit me hard

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 21 00:48:10 2016 No.2785665 man bun. >>2781579 oooga ooga oggaaa oogaa nua ahagga neenaa gaaaiiiiiiiiiiiiiiii

>>	Anonymous Wed Dec 21 00:49:59 2016 No.2785668 >>2781849 I don't get it

Anonymous Wed Dec 21 00:55:21 2016 No.2785673
File: 603 KB, 814x972, 1430112267383.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>2783152
His anatomy is shit. One of the worst porn artists out there. Of all the porn artists you white in shinning armored faggots could possibly defend, why choose shadshit?
If it's just you're opinion that's fine, but shadshits art is subjectively awful.

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 22 09:23:36 2016 No.2787569 >>2781579 pic related isnt shadman right? who is he?

>>	Anonymous Thu Dec 22 09:32:05 2016 No.2787579 >>2785673 that hillary clinton "hillloli" thing he did was fucking hilarious I will give him that but yeah his anatomy needs work and he does a lot of pillow shading laziness

>>	Anonymous Fri Dec 23 20:45:18 2016 No.2789417 >>2785668 There was an old game online that you could beat around and shoot at a little guy. It was a fun time in the early 2000's

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 24 05:42:21 2016 No.2789863 >>2781849 double-u double-u double-u dot addictinggames.com/funny-games/interactivebuddy.jsp Thank me later mofuckers. This shit was so cash.

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 24 07:26:22 2016 No.2789953 File: 48 KB, 948x960, 1466467928682.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2781849

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 24 07:59:02 2016 No.2789970 >>2781579 you have low standards. that's all there is to shadman and you. now you can go kys.

Anonymous Sat Dec 24 12:37:58 2016 No.2790156
File: 40 KB, 307x316, 1323099096636.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>2789417
>Bullying buddy

You could play with him and that'd made him happy.
I remember it clearly because I had a surreal experience with it where I started to bully the shit out of it to see what happens, he got sad and I had a bitch moment where I started to feel real fucking sad about it.
Worked hard to make him "happy" again.

>>	ㅡ Sat Dec 24 12:43:37 2016 No.2790161 >>2781849 >Triggered

>>	Anonymous Sat Dec 24 12:46:42 2016 No.2790167 >>2783105 This Its low quality but he draws a shit ton and his drawings are gratifying arousing in a very dirty way.

>>	Anonymous Sun Dec 25 21:37:42 2016 No.2791934 >>2785673 >his anatomy is shit where?, you are talking about exaggerated pin up characters the proportions are meant to be big and balloonish again i dont really like that style, i dont like at all teh faces, but i dont think its total shit

>>	Anonymous Mon Dec 26 00:48:26 2016 No.2792084 >>2791934 There's exaggeration and not knowing how to draw. He's been drawing for so many years, yet his stuff is still beginner tier.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]