[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 17 KB, 392x441, loomis-planes.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2481665 No.2481665 [Reply] [Original]

Will beginners actually get anything out of Loomis if they haven't grasped drawing in 3D yet? Why does every meme this guy if people aren't ready for him?

>> No.2481671

If you'd actually opened Fun with a Pencil you'd notice it basically starts with exercises trying to cram this concept down your throat by drawing contours around spheres and shit.

>> No.2481707

>>2481671
>Fun with a pencil

Gas yourself

>> No.2481752

>>2481707

Sorry I'm right. He explains it right at the start of the fucking book, you not liking it doesn't make it not true.

>> No.2481754

>>2481752

Except you're not.

All that book does is show you how to draw useless outdated cartoon mickey mouse shit from the 40s.

>> No.2481758
File: 132 KB, 543x704, Screenshot_29.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2481758

>>2481754

Confirming you've never opened the fucking book and you're too butthurt to understand that the purpose of those shitty cartoon faces is learning construction and form.

Did the OP ask whether Loomis lives up to the hype? No. The question was if Loomis works as a starting place to someone who doesn't understand drawing in 3D. Fun with a Pencil addresses exactly that. Cry about it if you want.

>> No.2481759
File: 229 KB, 1451x571, Blook Butt.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2481759

>>2481754
lol blookhurt

>> No.2481769

>>2481759
lol loomis wanted to be the little girl

>> No.2481777

>>2481759
This pic gets me every time, who made it?

>> No.2481798

>>2481707
I'm working through fun with a pencil and am a fresh start artist so I can tell you as a matter of fact that it is worthwhile and I am noticing improvements.

>> No.2482589

>>2481665
Because I used to assume that people who came here at least had some basic drawing ability.

Like, if you're over 18 and never picked up a pencil before, why even bother trying? You have no hope.

>> No.2482604

>>2482589

You don't have the spark.

>> No.2482607

>>2482604

STOP SAYING THIS

>> No.2482608

>>2482604
>>2482607

samefag

>> No.2482624 [DELETED] 
File: 183 KB, 960x714, wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2482624

>>2482608
kill your god damn self

>> No.2482628
File: 74 KB, 531x519, wwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwwww4ww.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2482628

>>>>2482608

kill your god damn self

>> No.2482630

>>2482628

>look guys i can inspect element!! xDDD

You first.

>> No.2482637
File: 24 KB, 500x352, do it.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2482637

>>2482630

>> No.2482655

Jesus Christ this thread

>> No.2482658

>>2482637

Yes, now do it.

>> No.2482670

>>2482604
I am new to this board. I have just had this same thing said in my first thread here. Is 'You don't have the spark' an /ic/ meme?

>> No.2482674

>>2482670
yes, though OP is aggressively pushing it everywhere today

>> No.2482675

>>2482670
Leave while you have the chance and never come back.

Some of us are stuck here for eternity.

>> No.2482676

>>2482675
Ok :(

>> No.2482721

>>2482670
No, a loser or two who are more interested in board culture and memes than art are trying to push it right now. They did the same thing with "blog?" a little while ago.

>> No.2482728

>>2482721

No, if you don't have the spark/talent you should not bother, and he shouldn't.

>> No.2482731

>>2482721
>blog?
Haven't been on here for awhile, isn't this just the usual question?

>> No.2482749

>>2482731
It's sometimes asked as a serious question, usually phrased as more than just blog? though, however it was being spammed in response to random posts containing obviously low quality work to be sarcastic. It's died off recently though and seems to be replaced by this spark thing.

>>2482728
I know what the term means, I'm not saying it's not an existing phrase or idea. However it is not only wrong and against basically what ic exists for, but is being spammed in a similar way to random posts with low quality work. Again you can generally tell because the shitposter only says the spark line the same way they only said blog?.

>> No.2482871

>>2481671
>>2481671
>>2481671
>>2481671
>>2481671
This a million times.

You obviously don't start with head construction as a newbie.

>> No.2482888

>>2481665
They won't get anything out of Loomis if they don't have the spark.

>> No.2482940

>>2482888
Fuck off with this meme. Speaking as someone who learns abnormally quickly and has triple ligameme, it's just wasting time. Mileage is the only way to get gud

>> No.2482943

>>2481707

>im still shit and its fully fault of the books
God, we dont need these kind of "artists" anymore

>> No.2482946

>>2481671
>>2481758

I did forget about this. But is that really an effective way to understand drawing in 3d? Unlike the other good books Loomis doesn't seem to advocate very explicitly drawing from life a lot.

>> No.2482948
File: 84 KB, 1845x1080, 1460161649497.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2482948

Are you the same guy again?

>> No.2482958

>>2482948
this is really fantastic but who made it?? Tumblr or the Instagram???

>> No.2482975

>>2482948

why the hell would i be posting in this shithole thread when ive been actually trying to improve, if you looked at that thread youd see this.