Why is this 16 year old girl a MUCH better artist than Loomis?

[Anonymous No.2469320]

https://twitter.com/Familyguyeatsa

Her drawings look almost like photos while loomis looks like cartoony shit from the 1950s plus she draws cooler more contemporary internet celebrities like the amazing atheist and Bernie sanders and mrrepzion and pewdiepie

Fuck, why is Loomis more popular then her?

Ughh faith in humanity lost

[Anonymous No.2469321]

this is an example of that shitty cartoony artist loomis http://www.oklahoma.net/~silvrdal/boy.gif

and this is her art https://twitter.com/Familyguyeatsa

Funny how a little hispanic teenager just DESTROYED a famous 1950s illustrator

[Anonymous No.2469322]

april fools is over dumbass

[Anonymous No.2469324]

>>2469322
it dont matter cause she is still a better artist

[Anonymous No.2469325]

>look almost like photos
try and guess why

[Anonymous No.2469329]

The difference between her and Loomis is that Loomis could can draw amazing faces from imagination whereas she couldn't even draw an orange from imagination

[Anonymous No.2469331]

>>2469325
cuz she is more talented then that hack loomis, hell she is better then all of these so called "Famous talented artists in the industry" like Craig Mullins, I mean his art still looks cartoony as shit I mean look at this crap

http://static1.squarespace.com/static/53b47904e4b078d8d9d974f6/53bcbee2e4b0b6f1419f9f55/53c1c1b8e4b0c9cf4d6482dc/1405206982469/field.jpg?format=1000w

It looks unrealistic and styilized and cartoony,

while her art like https://pbs.twimg.com/media/CNwi0o8WcAAJ02E.jpg:large

ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE A PHOTO AND IS MORE REALISTIC

fuck these injustices in the world, why isn't she working for like peter jackson or something

[Anonymous No.2469332]

>>2469331
>http://static1.squarespace.com/static/53b47904e4b078d8d9d974f6/53bcbee2e4b0b6f1419f9f55/53c1c1b8e4b0c9cf4d6482dc/1405206982469/field.jpg?format=1000w

Also, I forgt to mention that Mullins shit doesn't have have a face, wtf? Whats wrong with this world where a some cartoony ass artist is considered "better" then MUCH MORE TALENTED artist just because she is a teen on twitter

fuck, this is why humanity sucks

[Anonymous No.2469334]

>>2469331
>why isn't she working for like peter jackson
Because he could hire the original photographer

[Anonymous No.2469338]

>op trying this hard

by this point i think most people can tell

when you try to do these threads you can't make it too obvious

honestly i give this thread a 3/10. absolutely lacking bait fundamentals

[Anonymous No.2469343]

>>2469338
What do you mean I am baiting

are you just jelous that this young 16 year old artist can draw better then you? Are just a jelous neckbeard or something?

[Anonymous No.2469347]

>>2469343
Holy shit stop being such a fagget op. Can't you see you're adding more and more cancer to the board

[Anonymous No.2469349]

>>2469343
Anon, please you could be spending your time drawing right now.

[Anonymous No.2469352]

Trying waaay too hard but I gotta hand it to you for effort. Remember that subtlety is key, anon.

[Anonymous No.2469367]

>>2469352
I'm just guessing you dont believe me heres her drawing video
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=LDcEFGfUn7g

now for comparison here is a shitty drawing by glenn vilpoo
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=fUgPTy0LS0E

See the difference, her drrawinsg look like REAL life, not even da vinci's drawings look like photos let alone glenn "im a wannabe hack who has been destroyed by a teenager' Villpu

[Anonymous No.2469369]

>>2469320
>You didn't even bait the hook, anon

[Anonymous No.2469376]

worst bait thread ever.

it's such a bad troll it maybe ascending to a meta troll level.

[Anonymous No.2469378]

>>2469369
what do you mean?

the fact remains, her drawings look like photos and more realistic

andrew loomis's drawing still look like cartoons

a young teenage prodigy is much better then industry professionals
stop living in denial
deal with it

[Anonymous No.2469379]

>>2469331
Please stop with this posting in this bad bait thread

[Anonymous No.2469380]

>>2469367
Okay, I'm bored so I'll bite
>comparing a time lapse video of copying a photo 1:1 with an instructional one that teaches concepts about figure drawing
If your sole aspiration is to become a human photocopier then I guess you're right

[Anonymous No.2469387]

>>2469349
Why would you want him to be productive?

[Anonymous No.2469391]

>op still being cringey after the joke is over

we're actually trying to teach you how to bait better and yet you want to keep it up

i actually don't understand anything anymore

[Anonymous No.2469393]

>>2469391
>inb4 I was only pretending to be retarded

[Anonymous No.2469440]

>>2469320
I wish we had mods.

[Anonymous No.2469952]

I guess her drawings have good composition. Not even sure about that. They all just look lurid/over detailed and make me want to vomit.

[Anonymous No.2471698]

>>2469334
this

[Anonymous No.2472088]

>Fuck, why is Loomis more popular then her?

Because Loomis was a striaght white male

[Anonymous No.2472095]

>>2469343
I would fuck her.

[Anonymous No.2472101]

>>2469320
post her shitty photos

I'm not clicking any external shit

[Anonymous No.2472105]

>>2472101
>not trusting a twitter link
Its not worth the time anon. The art is that of an average highschooler, who only references photos. The girl drew a butt, from imagination, and it was bad.