/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

[Anonymous No.2453215]

>art

[Anonymous No.2453224]

>OP

[Aprilia No.2453255]

>>2453224
>picassofag detected
How do you appreciate this fucking shit

[Anonymous No.2453267]

>>2453224
this

if you don't already realize that the 'what is art?' discussion is pointless, then fuck you

art isn't just one thing. you aren't going to like every work of art or every artist. deal with it.

[Anonymous No.2453281]

>>2453255
You don't make 50,000 paintings and have them all be masterworks.

>>2453267
This one is dope though. Flat forms, pre cubist days.

[Anonymous No.2453287]

>>2453281
post-cubist days. part of his neoclassical 'return to order'

[Anonymous No.2453292]

>>2453255
>stop liking what I don't like!

I dont even like picasso, but you're gonna get bored of art really quickly if all you enjoy is atelier-drone realistic nude studies

[Anonymous No.2453430]

Wish art was about what looked good to the eye and not about having the deepest meaning behind your colour smudges. Pic related, art that actually looks good and gets me to feel something else than sadness for the people affected by radioactivity.

[Aprilia No.2453432]

>>2453430
Fug forgot pic

[Anonymous No.2453440]

>>2453432
Makes me feel shitty white boi middle class after school vibes. Not everyone gives a fuck about Halo.

I don't even know how to process that outside of a Halo context, the narrative has been established. The painting is pretty meh though.

1v1 me Blood Gulch pistols fgt

[Aprilia No.2453445]

>>2453440
Remove Warthog then, and perhaps the pillar thingies. It still looks way better than the OP pic, come on. That looks like something a kid drew, and then an artist tried to use the original lines to make something out of it, but it looks shit, so he killed himself. And I will 1v1 you on Blood Gulch any day, perhaps not with pistols though. Sniper pistols sounds better.
>another example on art that actually looks good and doesn't require you to think about what the colours mean, and what it symbolizes.

[Aprilia No.2453448]

>>2453445
Forgot the damn pic again. Maybe I should sleep

[Anonymous No.2453455]

>>2453445
This is closer in comparison. The concept looks closer, has atmosphere, decent harmony and it's a decent landscape.

Now look at this Cezanne (I think). I'll take the abstract any day. It's familiar but jarring, flattened but pulls you around. I could stare at this a ton longer then the nice landscape.

>Pistoling across the gulch from behind Red base
Fuck, why did I give up games.

[Aprilia No.2453457]

>>2453292
I don't look at art for entertainment. I won't get bored of it. And I like any art that doesn't look like shit, so it's fine, there's plenty of stuff for me to oogle on that doesn't look like it was made by an autist

[Aprilia No.2453459]

>>2453455
Hell, I will take that. Atleast it looks like it took some fucking effort to make. In contrast to the
>random bodypart
>draw it in a way that makes it look like something else, anything but the original
>attach to other bodypart in a irregular way
>rinse, repeat
>colour that shit
>use all the colours in the rainbow
>shit will look lit senpai
>oh hell ye im tripping
>finish coloring
>art

[Aprilia No.2453463]

>more detailed art that doesn't look like it took 30 mins to make

[Anonymous No.2453467]

>>2453463
this looks like videogame graphics and is boring
if i wanted to look at nature that isn't rendered poorly then i'd go outside

[Aprilia No.2453473]

>>2453467
It is videogame graphics. Nonetheless. Please do show me how it looks outside your door. Must be pretty dope. But yeah, I agree, nature exists for real as well. But all these are bad examples, I have seen detailed art that just makes me want to drop my entire life and just live wherever the fuck that place is. And the same way that you can go outside if you want to look at a nice natural scenery, I can google: Hiroshima, and get real versions of Picassos "art"

[Anonymous No.2453474]

>>2453463
Something to be careful about with Picasso, the quality is all over the map. The whores of some French town I can't spell because I'm not a Francophone Canadian had 20+ prepatory sketches. In his stride he could crank out 20-40 in a day.

[Aprilia No.2453478]

>>2453474
Ok dude, that's cool. But it doesn't really matter how long it took if it LOOKS like it took 30 mins.

[Anonymous No.2453480]

>>2453473
I want to live wherever the fuck this shit can go down. Or at least blend together atomic imagery and a Japanese woman.

At least Postmoderism killed Art and MM is futilely trying to rebuild it. Everything is Art, nothing is Art but we have some Art that we value more then art.

[Anonymous No.2453482]

>>2453432
I hope you're trolling

If not, you're proving a good point about tastes being subjective

[Anonymous No.2453486]

>>2453448
let me guess, you think bob ross is the greatest artist of the 20th century

fucking pleb

>>2453455
>Cezanne
Picasso. Very clearly Cubist.

[Aprilia No.2453487]

>>2453482
I'm going half meme here. It's 4 am I might be saying some weird shit, but generally my points is: Art should be what looks good. Not whatever has the deepest meaning behind it"s colours and contrast and whatever the fuck.

[Aprilia No.2453490]

>>2453486
I barely know Bob Ross. Is that he fag with the nice hair that draws nature and shit? Sure he is cool. I don't care who, I care about what, and how it looks. Not what it means

[Anonymous No.2453492]

>>2453487
'what looks good' varies wildly from individual to individual. that's why your grandmother has a kitsch kinkade cottage print on her dining room wall.

if you're trying to find a "deep meaning" in some random picasso portrait, you're wasting your time. it's all about the flattening of space, shape, color, form, etc. Formal elements, not heady concepts.

[Anonymous No.2453495]

>>2453490
>I don't care who, I care about what, and how it looks
that was my point. you seem to have a taste for terrible kitsch landscapes.

just keep namefagging so I can easily discard your opinions in the future.

[Aprilia No.2453498]

>>2453492
Alright, I see you. But generally, my point still stands. No way that so many people think that the stuff Picasso drew looks better than most newer detailed art

>>2453495
Feel free. You won't be seeing me on here after this thread anyway. My excuse for namefagging is that it is set to this automatically

[Anonymous No.2453505]

>>2453498
>No way that so many people think that the stuff Picasso drew looks better than most newer detailed art
and no way so many people like boring, mediocre landscapes. see how this works? I understand my tastes, but cannot account for the tastes of others. everyone has their own criteria. Personally I hate the pre-raphaelites (for the most part), but I have many artist friends who adore them. different strokes for different folks.

live and let live, shitposting about other people's tastes or art you don't like accomplishes nothing.