Sakimichan's Patreon exclusive artwork.

File: 143 KB, 540x699, Sakimichan1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

Sakimichan's Patreon exclusive artwork. Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:09:25 2015 No.2134913 [DELETED]

I did not give Sakimichan my money for this.
Don't give her any shekels!

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:09:50 2015 No.2134914 File: 158 KB, 540x701, Sakimichan2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:10:41 2015 No.2134915 File: 164 KB, 540x699, Sakimichan3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:11:33 2015 No.2134916 File: 175 KB, 540x794, Sakimichan4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:11:36 2015 No.2134917 >>2134914 kek, them boobs are shit

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:12:13 2015 No.2134918 File: 137 KB, 540x699, Sakimichan5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:13:10 2015 No.2134921 >>2134917 i wonder if she cares her art is shitty as fuck? oh wait she is making half a million a year lmao... and that's just from patreon alone. jesus fucking christ.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:13:38 2015 No.2134922 >>2134913 So that's where she gets her money from. Horny losers who want to pay for a woman to draw nudes of the most generic pop-cultural characters.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:14:35 2015 No.2134924 >>2134917 I'm sure they would have looked better, if she had the chance to add shines or jizz dripping off her tits. Otherwise, she seems she can't into boob anatomy for "normal" tits.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:22:29 2015 No.2134931 >>2134913 I actually found all of these images on Tumblr. I'm pretty sure that post is deleted by now. I don't know why I didn't share these sooner.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:23:44 2015 No.2134933 >>2134913 What does sakimichan look like? How do we know it isn't just a guy using his girlfriend to speak for him?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:24:01 2015 No.2134934 File: 650 KB, 695x900, 18013829736968632485.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] so, anybody got this? :3

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:25:33 2015 No.2134936 >>2134921 Zeronis is guilty of the same thing. I actually kind of like Zeronis too.

Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:27:44 2015 No.2134938

>>2134933
Someone posted a pic of her once in one of these hate threads. She was just an average asian, not super attractive but not ugly. Fairly unnoticeable.

>>2134934
Kek, that censor bar at the crotch is covering a really odd place. Is his dick bent up and back in a weird way??

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:29:09 2015 No.2134940 File: 4 KB, 426x364, 1429401016549.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >mfw I am starting to get better than Sakimichan every day while she starts to stagnates behind her millions of dollars.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:30:29 2015 No.2134943 >>2134917 >>2134921 >>2134924 You morons could look in the upper left corner, you know. It's an edit.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:30:45 2015 No.2134944 >>2134938 Why did she cover the nipples? Also, she missed an opportunity to form a triforce with the censors.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:32:37 2015 No.2134945 >>2134943 hey moron i know that, thats why i called them shit m8

Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:34:15 2015 No.2134947

>>2134940
I honestly hope something happens where she loses a ton of her money. Let's start spreading her Patreon exclusives around the internet.

>http://rule34.paheal.net/post/list/sakimichan/1

A lot of her NSFW Patreon exclusives can be found in the link above.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:34:24 2015 No.2134948 >>2134940 You wish.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:36:18 2015 No.2134951 >>2134947 The people willing to pay for this shit are obviously invested personally. If they just wanted the nudes, they wouldn't pay her hundreds or dollars, but the minimum amount.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:36:30 2015 No.2134952 File: 47 KB, 451x495, 1435110718665.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2134948 If I learn to polish and pander like her I would be right up there. I believe it.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:36:41 2015 No.2134953 >>2134947 been looking for this for a while now. thanks anon

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:36:43 2015 No.2134954 >>2134947 Why would you attempt to sabotage another person's success? I really can't understand your mindset. It's the ultimate form of jealousy and pettiness.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:39:01 2015 No.2134955 >>2134954 Because she really doesn't deserve her success and is using a cheap tactic to get $55K+.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:39:51 2015 No.2134956 >>2134954 IKR? It's pathetic.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:41:18 2015 No.2134957 >>2134952 I think pandering is good to build a fanbase. After you've built up a large fanbase, you should stop pandering so much.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:42:15 2015 No.2134958 >>2134955 Who are you to say that she doesn't deserve? She knows how to do her market. Get better at it fagboy. Wouldn't you be doing the same thing in her place?

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:43:17 2015 No.2134960 >>2134958 See >>2134957

Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:43:45 2015 No.2134961

>>2134955

>doesn't deserve her success

A lot of people would say artists don't deserve money period. Thankfully we live in a society where some dipshit doesn't dictate to people who or what they spend their money on.
It isn't coming out of your pocket, it's coming out of some other idiot's who is happy to give it away, so it's none of your damn business, is it?

That said, I don't mind you posting her Patreon exclusives, though doing it explicitly for the reason of fucking with her is retardedly vindictive.

Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:43:56 2015 No.2134962

>>2134958
>Wouldn't you be doing the same thing in her place?

Not that guy, but that's a pretty sad mentality to have.
Most great artists become successful because they follow their own path. Granted, I don't know if Sakimichan is pandering or not. I think she genuinely is that shallow, and likes to draw the shit that she does.

Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:47:04 2015 No.2134965

>>2134962

If I were in that place, I'd take in that cash while I can.

Hell, do it for a few years and you've got a war chest for when you decide to pursue your personal stuff that might be less profitable. I don't know how old she is, but I highly doubt she's going to croak any time soon, so taking advantage of people throwing money at you for a few years isn't a bad idea. You never know when that well might run dry.

Shallow? Maybe. But you ask many people on /ic/ "should I do art?" most will say "fuck no, get a job that pays."
She's got a job that pays.

Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:47:04 2015 No.2134966

>>2134955
Who's to say who is deserving or not? Thousands of people are willingly paying her. Seems more legitimate to me than some CEO setting a giant salary for himself even if his role at the company is almost non-existent at that point. Do you complain about every actor or athlete who makes millions? Do they not deserve it? If there are enough fans willing to pay money then I think it is deserving. Maybe you don't like it, and that's fine, then just don't support it. End of story.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:48:12 2015 No.2134968 >>2134962 But what if she is pandering? She probably do it for some Bucks, given people what they like, while probably doing some side personal jobs. Seriously, it's so fucking petty see people talking what artists should or shouldn't draw.

Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:52:00 2015 No.2134971

Would /ic/ bitch nearly as much if she got a well paying job as a concept artist or something?
How is that not also pandering to someone? You're getting paid for a product where it doesn't matter if YOU want to do it, you're doing it because you get paid. It's called having a profession, and it doesn't matter who pays you. Sakimichan has simply democratized the process and done very well for it as a result.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:55:24 2015 No.2134975 >>2134971 >Would /ic/ bitch nearly as much if she got a well paying job as a concept artist or something? Yes.

Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:56:37 2015 No.2134976

Sakimichan is a marketing genius who deserves every cent she makes.

Yes, her art is painfully bland.
Yes, there are thousands of better artists than her.

BUT,
She works hard and constantly produces work for her fans on an almost daily basis. You lazy fucks just waste your useless time on this shitty board bitching about anyone more successful than you.

Deserve it? She deserves every penny. What you pathetic whiny dregs deserve is to work your shit ass off until one day, you can dream of coming anywhere near 1% of the success Sakimichan does.

TL;DR your art fucking sucks, you are a useless piece of shit and your dreams of living off your art are hiliarious at best, fucking sad at worst.

(Not everyone, I'm glad there are some people in this thread who aren't pathetic jelly fucks like this dumbass >>2134947)

Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:56:53 2015 No.2134977

>>2134947

She draw things that people like to see, and they are pying her for it!

What a fucking nazi!

Seriously, I first wanted to say that I hope that you never had sucess with your art...but I realizado that it would be as petty as you.

I just hope that some day you learn to don't be so jealous.

>>	Anonymous Sat Jun 27 23:58:59 2015 No.2134978 File: 1.41 MB, 1314x1700, Vincent_Valentine sakimichan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] why nobody posts the guys? is it because the oppresive patriarchy?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:01:29 2015 No.2134979 Aren't you faggots tired of having the same fucking argument over and over and OVER AND OVER? >waahhh she's plateauing yet she's successful >waahhh you're just jealous >post your art faggot >fanart is for scum fucking stop already.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:01:32 2015 No.2134980 >>2134977 >shitskin detected.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:03:17 2015 No.2134981 File: 10 KB, 233x215, 1434669524121.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2134979 Eye don't think they will do that.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:04:19 2015 No.2134983 >>2134979 First time on /ic/ I doesn't even know that these discussions are common. >>2134980 I'm not fan of her works tho. I just found the behavior patethic. I would sua the same for any artist.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:05:29 2015 No.2134984

>>2134976
This

Sakimichan makes a living off her art which most of /ic will only dream of doing. Whether or not someone personally finds her art attractive is irrelevant to her success in this strange and backwards industry.

Learn from her success and learn from her mistakes. Stay smart /ic

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:08:32 2015 No.2134987 Just shut up y'all and post more males.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:20:37 2015 No.2134991 sniff sniff I smell jealousy.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:20:45 2015 No.2134992 >>2134987 >>>/lgbt/

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:20:47 2015 No.2134993 Normally I don't really care what Sakimi does, but all of these breasts except for this one: >>2134914 all look like they are filled with silicone and hard. Also, >>2134978 bothers me so much. It's like his penis is too high or something.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:23:50 2015 No.2134994

>>2134968
>>2134965
I'm not really enraged by the fact that she's making money. I'm just surprised.

The amount of money she makes simply isn't reflected in the quality or content of her work. It's just gaudy, superficial shit. Then again, that seems to be what the millennials and modern, self-proclaimed geeks love. Just look at Blizzard.
Bottom line, I don't like her art and think her fanbase is retarded, but it's not something that bothers me. I can understand that some people would lash out at her though, as that happens to every single person with any kind of fame.

As for myself, I wouldn't pander. However, if I had the ability to produce content on a regular basis and work on art 8 hours a day, I think I could build up a moderately successful Patreon. Granted, there are plenty of artists that would consider my art superficial and shallow, so I guess I shouldn't complain about her.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:28:02 2015 No.2134995 >>2134993 >It's like his penis is too high or something wow. it is. do you think she needs a submisive male to be used as an erect penis reference model? perhaps i still got a chance

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:28:35 2015 No.2134996 >>2134991 Do you have any idea how stupid this makes you look? Every fanbase in the world uses this argument, as if the only reason to dislike someone is jealousy. You sound like a Belieber.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:34:18 2015 No.2134998 >>2134996 Seems legit in this particular case tho. Just read the fagboys complaining. The artist is not perfect, but she knows how to do marketing and how to give people what they want. She is paied for it, and it's not wrong you know?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:34:35 2015 No.2134999 There's one thing that's got me wondering. Is it even legal to make money off of fanart? Commissions tend to be low profile, so they usually get away with it, but is it actually legal to blatantly make a career out of drawing copyrighted characters?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:36:07 2015 No.2135000 I think its great she sells her patreon rewards on gumroad for those who still want smut of their favorite characters but don't want to rip her off on patreon by downloading her hard work for free and then pulling out.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:38:34 2015 No.2135001 >>2134913 every artist understands that piracy is a kind of flattering. not everybody's got leisure capital. also, i don't think that anybody that really cares for her patreon stuff has had problems getting it for free at the usual places.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:38:50 2015 No.2135002

>>2134998
>The artist is not perfect, but she knows how to do marketing and how to give people what they want.

Yes, and that's what bothers people. It's a combination of the shallow content and marketing. It's more a hatred of the retarded community that supports her, than the artist herself.
The reason this argument always falls on its ass, is because you can find other artists who make just as much money that these people don't hate. If it was jealousy, it would be universal, and not directed at specific people.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:46:27 2015 No.2135005 >>2135001 You'll never know the feeling of being pirated. Feels good.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:47:04 2015 No.2135006

>>2135002
Why hate someone because of that? I don't like her art, and I just give a fuck for it.

Wasting time being personally offended by it seems really petty and childish.

Also, what is shallow art? It's just fanart. Millions of people do that, usually for fun. She gives them what they are paying her to do.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:49:47 2015 No.2135009 >>2135002 Also....why an artist should be bothered by other artist drawing for other people?

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:51:42 2015 No.2135010

>>2135006
>Why hate someone because of that?
Are you serious? Is this your first time on the internet, or interacting with anyone ever? Personally, I don't give a fuck about her, but given how the world works, I can see why people hate her.

>Also, what is shallow art? It's just fanart.
Seriously?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:54:16 2015 No.2135012 File: 2.27 MB, 158x199, 1420693192004.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >lpls pay for my "porno" content >just slap a dick/boobs on already made pictures and this is supposed to be sexy?

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 00:59:33 2015 No.2135016

>>2135010
OK, I will put it in other way: wasting time cultivating negative emotions for such small thing just seems ridiculous for me.

I mean, look at some coments. I hated Justin Bieber, but I never was like "huahuahua I WILL DESTRIOY YOU BIEBER, I WILL DESTROY YOU hauhauhau!!!!!!!"

Seems like lack of emotional maturity for me.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 01:04:09 2015 No.2135019 >>2135016 It's better to spend my time trying to get better, instead of complaining about other people sucess on internet.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 01:05:07 2015 No.2135022

>>2135016
And, once again, welcome to the internet.
If you came to 4chan, an anoymous board known for its vocal and highly critical community, and expected people not to complain about the Justin Bieber of the art world, then I honestly don't know what to say.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 01:18:46 2015 No.2135028

>>2135022
To be sure, people on 4chan complain about everything. Some people cry like they were from fucking Tumblr.

I saw that girl sucess in a different way tho: if she could live with her art, even not being that great, maybe I could too one day. I just need to improve, be better than her, and know how to work my marketing.

I just don't get bothered by other people being payed to do a shity work that they were expected to do. Fuck who paied.

As said here
>>2134984
Learn from her sucess and learn from her mistakes.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 01:20:28 2015 No.2135029

>>2134913
Sakimichan does what she needs to do to get the money and that's not only totally fine but iven smart. Make a lot of money now...and do what you like once money isn't an issue anymore.
What i don't get is who in their right mind finds these paintings even remotely attractif? I just don't get it. Everythings screams at my senses. These paintings just make me feel ill just by looking at them.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 01:22:50 2015 No.2135032 File: 28 KB, 357x237, me.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2134913 FUCKING BASED PORNTREON

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 01:24:20 2015 No.2135033 >>2135028 If you want her success, you also need to follow her model. Do fanart of popular characters, and throw in some porn every now and then. You got to know your market, before you can do any marketing.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 01:31:31 2015 No.2135034 >>2134995 You know, with the amount of money she makes, I'm surprised she doesn't hire some models. She can basically get paid a shit ton to do life painting. It would teach her a lot and also let her pump these out faster and at a higher quality.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 02:10:10 2015 No.2135050 File: 1.39 MB, 1314x1700, Cloud_Strife Final_Fantasy_VII sakimichan.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] does she got spoken tutorials on the nude ones? i wanna hear her sweet shy voice explaining how to render a sweaty, veiny penis.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 02:13:16 2015 No.2135055 >>2135050 That is one awkward pose...

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 02:14:44 2015 No.2135060

>>2135034
>She can basically get paid a shit ton to do life painting.
What? First of all, what makes you think she can do life painting?
Second of all, she's making 60k a month, doing shitty fanart. How the fuck is life painting supposed to compete with that?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 02:18:00 2015 No.2135063 >>2134978 This is the male version of stomach vagina.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 02:19:17 2015 No.2135065 >>2135050 Either Cloud got butt implants or Sakimi has no idea how to draw legs.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 02:19:46 2015 No.2135066 Her greatest strengths are her work ethic and speed. I wish I could produce as much as she does.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 02:21:59 2015 No.2135068 >>2135066 That's the only thing I'll give her, and that I genuinely envy.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 02:24:45 2015 No.2135070 >>2135068 that's precisely the only thing you need to get gud, and the one everybody at /ic/ lacks

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 02:52:01 2015 No.2135079

>>2135070
A big part of the reason there are so many failures in modern society, is because of the modern lifestyle that revolves around the internet. There are too many distractions, and too easy to live life inside, disconnected from the outside world.
People don't realize that if you live your life in front of your computer, it's going to have an effect on your mind. Humans aren't made to live isolated, where every day is the same as the next. Some people thrive in this environment, but these people are few. I think most /ic/ type artists who live like this would benefit from having a normal social life and interests outside the house, while having a dedicated time and place to work on their art. In other words I think having a studio or office to work in, free from distractions, would greatly benefit most people who struggle with motivation and work ethics.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 03:06:03 2015 No.2135087 the poses look like she drew the head first then added the body onto it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 03:54:35 2015 No.2135108 Is she actually bad at rendering tits or are these bad shops by anons? >>2134918 This looks in line with everything else >>2134914 >>2134978 These two are so off in rendering quality/style from everything else

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 04:16:33 2015 No.2135115 >>2134955 Drawing the kind of art you enjoy looking at and selling it isn't a cheap tactic, it's business.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 04:22:12 2015 No.2135118

>>2135079
This post is stupid, the Internets the reason you know of so many failures not the reason they exist.

The masses have never achieved anything, the old masters got good despite being dirt poor in some of the most squalid cess pools while millions like them got no where.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 04:49:41 2015 No.2135137 >>2134978 THE DICK IS SEMI TRANSPARENT

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 04:54:00 2015 No.2135141

>>2135118
I'm not talking about masters, I'm talking about normal people in this generation. Before the internet, you couldn't sit inside all day, because you'd be bored to tears. You either had to go out and meet friends, or get a hobby. If you got a hobby, there weren't nearly as many direct distractions as there are now, apart form TV.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 05:13:57 2015 No.2135149 File: 10 KB, 247x208, 45524.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] soon 30k!

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 05:26:14 2015 No.2135152 File: 18 KB, 271x389, 1357871583318.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2135050 >>2134978 >lesbians in charge of drawing penises

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 05:40:14 2015 No.2135154 >>2135152 Dicks aside, the poses are just fucking awkward to look at. It's one thing when a woman poses with her tits out, but it looks weird when the guys are doing dramatic poses with their boners out.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 05:40:38 2015 No.2135155 >>2134914 this looks shooped, what is going on with the lighting on her left arm and tit?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 05:44:45 2015 No.2135159 >>2135149 >mfw she had my artwork posted on her feed >feelsgoodman

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 05:46:32 2015 No.2135160 >>2135155 >this looks shooped No shit. It says so in the fucking picture.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 05:46:58 2015 No.2135161

>she giggles and struggles to say 'nipples' in her training videos
>draws massive cock and tits with ease

lmao shes soooo cute xD
i'm poor, living in a trailer and haven't had solid food to eat for 2 days straight now but i'm giving $5 to her patreon. she deserves it for these brave drawings against the patriarchic male-dominated art industry.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 06:08:02 2015 No.2135168

Threads like this always show exactly who has the mindset to make it in this industry and who doesn't

Has a chance of making it:
>"Wow, some artists can make up to 60.000$ per month and don't have to be god-tier amazing skill-wise, this is great news!"

Won't ever make it:
>"This cunt doesn't deserve her money, I hope she loses everything, commercially successful mediocre artists shouldn't exist!"

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 06:08:26 2015 No.2135169 File: 114 KB, 258x258, 1435382158179.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >ic still being mad that she makes money despite not being able to draw >never change ic

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 06:13:54 2015 No.2135171
File: 2.29 MB, 1424x2000, 1364659354299.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>2135161
I know neckbeards like you really need this "us vs them" narrative, but Sakimichan isn't actually liked much by tumblr femnazis at all. Not only is she constantly objectifying and sexualizing women with her illustrations, she got majorly burned by Tumblr a couple of years ago for "whitewashing" their nigga Korra.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 06:16:29 2015 No.2135174 File: 1.20 MB, 400x225, 1426450968809.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >look on dA >see several saki ripoffs and copycats

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 06:17:08 2015 No.2135175 >>2135169 >can't draw for shit >projects it onto /ic/ Speak for yourself faggot.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 06:41:23 2015 No.2135190 >>2135171 reminds me of mike azevedo

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 06:44:29 2015 No.2135192 >>2135171 Getting tumblr mad at you is a great way to get exposure through all those dumb blogs.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 06:52:08 2015 No.2135197 >>2135141 You most certainly could sit inside all day, shut ins aren't some kind of new concept. Sure a lot less people make it big doing anything but that's because it's a lot harder to succeed these days, the internet has very little to do with it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 07:00:16 2015 No.2135203 Are.... these real? I didn't know she was a porn artist? that 60k/month kinda loses its value to me now

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 07:13:14 2015 No.2135204

>>2134951
Lmao no, buck-o. Have you ever seen the pathetic losers that pay for furry porn? They pay hundreds, thousands for some furry dick in cartoon horse's drippin vaj.
These people just want n00ds of pop culture characters while bating to the fact that a qt asian female drew these pictures.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 07:14:49 2015 No.2135205 >>2135203 You have to pay her $10 a month to get the porn. Seedy business model. Also, what's the fucking point of having a 2 week payout, rather than once a month? Does it trick stupid people into thinking it's less?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 07:17:17 2015 No.2135206 >>2135205 Nevermind. I think I get it. She makes one picture every 2 weeks, and that's what you're paying for. I retract my earlier statement about her having good work ethics.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 07:18:35 2015 No.2135207 >>2135204 You're just reinforcing my point. If they simply wanted the pictures, I'm sure they pop up elsewhere.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 07:23:54 2015 No.2135210 >>2135159 >she had my artwork posted on her feed Post it please

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 07:26:44 2015 No.2135212

>>2135197
>shut ins aren't some kind of new concept.
As a widespread concept, yes they are. This is common knowledge. The internet has created a venue where people can fill their minimum requirements for social interaction and entertainment, along with a billion other distractions.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 07:28:17 2015 No.2135213 >>2135207 Getting things while their still fresh out the oven gets people excited and feeling warm. They most likely pay her so they can get her art asap.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 07:40:43 2015 No.2135216 >>2135169 >despite not being able to draw She is literally a better artist than 99.8% of /ic/.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 07:43:35 2015 No.2135217 >>2135203 >I didn't know she was a porn artist? She isn't? Not sure why people keep calling NSFW cheesecake and beefcake "porn" on here. Are you guys all underaged virgin nuns or something that you'd consider naked chicks and dudes in sexy poses porn?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 07:51:21 2015 No.2135218 >>2135210 you first

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 07:54:26 2015 No.2135219 >>2135212 As a wide spread concept they aren't.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:00:33 2015 No.2135222

>>2134913
I think I get why this style looks so garish and bland to me. She paints as if she's making an ad for some kind of product aimed at women.
Seriously, look up "makeup ad" on google image search. It's that dead-eyed, glossy look with no personality, combined with a stiff studio pose.

That same kinda goes for kr0n. No wonder, really, considering how he loves to copy movie posters and marketing materials.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:01:44 2015 No.2135223 >>2135219 So you're too young to remember a world without the internet. Gotcha.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:02:57 2015 No.2135224 >>2135217 Majority of people would consider it pornography, yes. What you're saying literally fits the fucking definition of it.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:03:28 2015 No.2135225 >>2135217 Well, it's softcore porn.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:05:28 2015 No.2135227 >>2135223 You're one of those people who watched idiocracy and got concerned that it might happen in the real world aren't you?

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:13:41 2015 No.2135229

>>2135217
>consider naked chicks and dudes in sexy poses porn?

Yes, and no ones being a prude about it. Just because you furiously masturbate to transvestite interracial amputee shit or whatever doesn't change the fact that what he/shes doing is still pornography.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:15:49 2015 No.2135234 >>2135217 Something created for the purpose of arousal is porn by definition. That includes those half naked for man calanders and the like though. In sakis case it's meant to be more cutesy erotic than cum slavery erotic.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:16:15 2015 No.2135236 >>2135227 You're one of those morons who only uses binary logic, aren't you? Saying that modern culture and the internet have created more shut ins, is the same as saying that everyone will become a shut in. Naturally.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:17:44 2015 No.2135238 >>2135224 I guess life drawing classes must be orgies to you.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:17:46 2015 No.2135239 >>2135236 >Saying that modern culture and the internet have created more shut ins, is the same as saying that everyone will become a shut in Not him but that makes no sense what so ever. Those points are not the same at all.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:20:01 2015 No.2135241 >>2135239 Yes, it's called sarcasm, considering the guy I was replying to was trying to make that point.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:20:31 2015 No.2135242 >>2135217 she draws dudes with an erection ERECTION

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:21:25 2015 No.2135243 >>2135241 Shit my bad.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:21:46 2015 No.2135244
File: 1.18 MB, 2414x3000, 1428606732579.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>2135234
>Something created for the purpose of arousal is porn by definition.

So pic related is porn? Gil Elvgren and all other oldschool pinup artists were porn artist?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:22:47 2015 No.2135245 >>2135229 People seem to be confused by that word. As far as I recall, porn has to involve visual depiction of the genitals during sexual stimulation. So nudity without sex isn't porn, and sex without showing the genitals isn't porn.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:23:56 2015 No.2135247 File: 301 KB, 1167x1200, frank_frazetta_top_of_morning.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2135244 What about Frazetta? Was Frazetta a porn artist?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:25:39 2015 No.2135248 File: 649 KB, 1280x675, Tutorial_027_by_alohalilo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2135247 What about this? Is this porn?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:29:44 2015 No.2135251 >>2135245 Just because people aren't getting it on with a dog or a horse or getting fucked by a 60-ton truck doesn't mean it isn't pornography. Porn is just meant to arouse the viewer, if it is softcore or hardcore doesn't matter.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:32:51 2015 No.2135253 File: 160 KB, 919x459, i-made-it.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2135210 your turn

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:32:55 2015 No.2135254 >>2135251 In that case, you're porn, because I'm getting hard.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:34:44 2015 No.2135255 >>2135254 tag! you're porn!

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:35:43 2015 No.2135256 >>2135248 >>2135247 It's called SOFTCORE PORN, the thing you get boners over when you're 12.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:37:06 2015 No.2135259
File: 133 KB, 520x700, 2353677767.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>2135251
Stop your hyperbole you retarded fuck. No one is talking about whatever depraved fetishes you are projecting onto others. Vanilla intercourse is clearly porn if the genitals are visible. No one is talking about dogs or horses or whatever disgusting shit you are into.

If your definition of porn is "created for the purpose of arousal" then fucking EVERYTHING that is remotely sexy has to be considered porn. Do you seriously consider any of the images posted above your post to be pornographic in nature?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:38:25 2015 No.2135262 >>2135259 They could technically be considered pornographic yes.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:40:21 2015 No.2135264 >>2135259 >autistic

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:40:26 2015 No.2135265 File: 125 KB, 1024x768, Frank Frazetta - Icon - 07.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2135256 >mfw according to /ic/, Frazetta was a softcore porn artist /ic/ never fails to reach new levels of retardation.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:40:47 2015 No.2135267 >>2135262 Yer a womans, ain'tcha?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:44:17 2015 No.2135272 File: 71 KB, 500x388, 1397215849924.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2135264 indeed you are.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:44:30 2015 No.2135274 >>2135265 If a picture is drawn with the intent to sexually arouse people = Porn It's not that hard to understand.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:50:05 2015 No.2135279 Please post more of the guys.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:50:20 2015 No.2135280 Is there going to be a time where I come to /ic/ and there isn't 6-7 sakimichans threads. Literally, every week there is a thread about her. WTF do people even talk about in these threads?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:51:57 2015 No.2135282 >>2135280 *When I come to /ic/

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:51:59 2015 No.2135283
File: 124 KB, 700x984, 3f95f65f5bb9ae744c4085ce38a9a56b_large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>2135274
You are wrong. It's not that hard to understand. Pic related doesn't even show any tits nor genitals, yet it was clearly drawn to sexually arouse. No one in their right mind would possibly call this porn.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:52:42 2015 No.2135284 >>2135280 Passive aggressive jealousy. At least I can admit that I'm not even close to her level and I'm jealous that I don't receive appreciation proportional to my level, if he have Sakimi as a measure.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:52:48 2015 No.2135285 >>2135238 You should search up the definition first before posting.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:53:42 2015 No.2135286 >>2135253 Kek

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:54:21 2015 No.2135288 File: 243 KB, 754x1060, miss_holli_would_pencils_by_reiq-d6qg6nr.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2135274 >porn

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:55:12 2015 No.2135289

>>2135283
IT'S CALLED SOFTCORE PORNOGRAPHY YOU FROTHING RETARD, we even have a board for this shit, it's called >>>/e/

>adjective
>1.
>of, relating to, or containing sexually arousing depictions that are not fully explicit:

Jesus Christ, I have never met anyone this dense.

>>	3DPD !!QBbzNWwIreJ Sun Jun 28 08:55:49 2015 No.2135290 >>2135283 There's a name for it, it's called ecchi. And Frazetta was clearly a softcore fanatsy porn artist.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:56:07 2015 No.2135291 File: 167 KB, 1280x1811, swamp_girl_with_sponge_by_xa_xa_xa-d62ahr8.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2135285 Sorry, too busy fapping to all this porn I never knew I had saved.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:57:57 2015 No.2135293 >>2135253 Underrated post.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:58:37 2015 No.2135294

>>2135291
Just admit you're wrong, at least. Hell, go search up the definition and see how
>Are you guys all underaged virgin nuns or something that you'd consider naked chicks and dudes in sexy poses porn?
fits the damn textbook definition.
>but muh pictures aren't explicit!
Then it's just cheesecake/beefcake, eechi, softcore, etc (I'd personally consider the latter two more towards the nsfw scale though.)

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 08:59:27 2015 No.2135295 File: 435 KB, 1250x745, 12425346.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2135289 yes, yes, I agree, everyone is a porn artist. Pic related, some sweet Ruanjia softcore porn.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:00:36 2015 No.2135296 File: 105 KB, 914x656, 1434976498728.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >Moebius was porn artist! >porn/ero >insult Looks like putting poonos into vagooo IRL will be pretty traumatic for some anons from /ic/

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:01:43 2015 No.2135299 >>2135295 Yes keep strawmanning, we'll get your point eventually, I'm sure.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:02:40 2015 No.2135301

>>2135294
>Then it's just cheesecake/beefcake, eechi, softcore, etc

Are you genuinely mentally challenged or something? Literally one sentence before the one you quoted I wrote:

>Not sure why people keep calling NSFW cheesecake and beefcake "porn" on here

Calling images that are clearly cheesecake / beefcake / erotica / pinup art etc "porn" is what I was complaining about in the first place. Holy shit, I really can't deal with the idiocy of this board sometimes. Thread hidden.

>>	3DPD !!QBbzNWwIreJ Sun Jun 28 09:04:20 2015 No.2135303 >>2135301 >Calling images that are clearly cheesecake / beefcake / erotica / pinup art etc "porn" is what I was complaining about in the first place. Have you been outside? That's what people call it in the real world.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:07:26 2015 No.2135306 >>2135301 Porn is not an evil word you autist, it's a fucking word used to describe things.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:11:26 2015 No.2135309 >>2135299 How is that a strawman. You make a ridiculous claim about how everything that's even remotely meant to be sexually arousing is porn, and he posts something that fits those criteria.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:14:30 2015 No.2135310 >>2135309 It's technicalities, no I wouldn't consider a suggestive butt for PORN, but technically it is softcore porn. It's the literal definition, there's nothing more to discuss.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:15:39 2015 No.2135311 >>2135253 You made it bro

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:19:47 2015 No.2135312

>>2135310
No. Softcore porn was a term that was invented to describe porn that doesn't show genitals.

As far as the definition goes:
pornography; sexually explicit videos, photographs, writings, or the like, produced to elicit sexual arousal (often used attributively):

It specifically states it's sexually explicit.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:21:46 2015 No.2135314 File: 28 KB, 348x321, 1429376953434.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google] >>2135312 >It's invented so it doesn't count

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:25:46 2015 No.2135317 >>2135301 >Not sure why people keep calling NSFW cheesecake and beefcake "porn" on here Because that's what it is. Search up the definition of pornography. Christ. For one who calls others retarded, you sure aren't so smart yourself.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:26:23 2015 No.2135318

>>2135244
>pin ups
>pictures of attractive women, often playboy centerfolds that were pinned to a wall
>are they porn?

I dunno man, you tell me?

>>2135236
No, that's not what I was getting at.
I was just dispelling a widely circulated myth regarding the internet. There are people who genuinely believe that those who could have made something of themselves didn't because the Internet was there to distract them. Despite the existence of shuts in for years before the internet.

For every love craft living with his mother and becoming a legendary author there were millions of stay at home sons who did nothing with their lives.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:27:38 2015 No.2135319 >>2135314 >strawman You also seem to ignore the rest of the post, which defines porn as something more than anything that causes sexual arousal.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:30:17 2015 No.2135321 >>2135318 >I was just dispelling a widely circulated myth regarding the internet. Failures always come up with excuses.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:30:21 2015 No.2135322

>>2135318
>There are people who genuinely believe that those who could have made something of themselves didn't because the Internet was there to distract them.

Except this is correct. Just because shut ins existed, doesn't mean the internet hasn't created more. And once again you're showing your retarded binary way of thinking. It's not all or nothing. It's some.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:31:37 2015 No.2135325 >>2135319 Except the definition of softcore pornography is right >>2135289 here. It literally describes the kind of pictures he posted perfectly and guess what it's called? SOFTCORE PORNOGRAPHY.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:37:12 2015 No.2135327
File: 916 KB, 243x278, tumblr_mbbxbaNyid1rfi4oso1_250[1].gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]

>>2135256
Porn is anything made for the SOLE purpose of sexual arousal. Getting aroused by the birth of venus doesn't make it porn.
Softcore pornography is the above, but without explicit penetration.

pic related, something being sexual doesn't make it porn
>inb4 tumblr
Literally googled whole nine yards.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:39:46 2015 No.2135328 >>2135327 I agree, you are correct.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:40:07 2015 No.2135329

>>2135325
Again, it refers to sex, like I said earlier.
http://www.merriam-webster.com/dictionary/softcore

>showing or describing sex acts but not in an extremely open and shocking way

It specifically says "sex acts". Not clothed person who makes a sexy pose.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:42:29 2015 No.2135331 >>2135329 http://dictionary.reference.com/browse/softcore?s=t It does though, stop cherry picking from shitty sources.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:50:11 2015 No.2135333 >>2135331 Shitty sources? Yeah, I guess your random internet dictionary holds more weight than the defining US dictionary of the past 180 years.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:52:00 2015 No.2135334 >muh freedom >muh shitty dictionaries

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:52:44 2015 No.2135335

>>2135322
No nut sack, I'm saying people who can be distracted will be.
The Internet at best provided an excuse for failure when something else would have before its existence.

Furthermore it can be said that ease of communication and information which would have normally been out of reach before the Internet has improved a persons chance of sucess/ ability to socialize.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 09:55:06 2015 No.2135337

>>2135333
>Meriam-Webster
lmao
http://www.oed.com/view/Entry/183898?redirectedFrom=softcore#eid21959749
Oxfords dictionairy says the same thing, Softcore is a wide term and can be applied to anything remotely sexually suggestive that is not hardcore pornography - yes, sexy poses too.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:00:46 2015 No.2135341

>>2135335
I'm fucking stumped. You actually believe that having constant access to entertainment and pseudo-social interaction in your home, has had no bearing on how people behave?
As I've said twice already, your thinking is entirely binary, like some kind of autist.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:09:13 2015 No.2135342

>>2135337
Are you retarded? Your link says the follow: less obscene than hard-core pornography

And pornography is defined as: The explicit description or exhibition of sexual subjects or activity in literature, painting, films, etc., in a manner intended to stimulate erotic rather than aesthetic feelings; printed or visual material containing this.

So it involves sex. Softcore involves less explicit sex.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:14:42 2015 No.2135348

>>2135342
No it does not you sad fuck, try go on any porn site and search softcore porn; you'll find girls showing off their tits and doing sexually suggestive poses and occasionally they will masturbate too. You never see softcore porn with people having actual sex, NEVER.

But okay let us look at another source then; http://www.urbandictionary.com/define.php?term=softcore
>1) Pornographic material that does not show penetration, genitalia, or actual sexual activity, opposite of hardcore.
>or actual sexual activity
Urbandictionairy is literally the normies dictionairy.

If this doesn't convince you, nothing will.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:15:19 2015 No.2135349 >>2135341 The debate wasn't over if it's affected how people behave. As a general rule of thumb if your argument requires the shifting of goal posts it's objectively wrong.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:22:58 2015 No.2135352 >>2135348 >You never see softcore porn with people having actual sex, NEVER. lelwat Evan Stone, Angel Long, Silvia Saint and a shitload of others are famous for their softcore stuff. How young are, have you never seen the porn they show on TV?

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:25:16 2015 No.2135354 >>2135352 Actually yes, I take that back, I was thinking about the Softcore AV idols, my point still stands though, if that can be called softcore it means there's no need for sex to be present to be called softcore pornography.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:27:32 2015 No.2135356 > arguing about what constitutes porn on an art board instead of doing studies and drawing I shouldn't be surprised considering the place we're at, but this is ridiculous. No wonder the lot of you are shit.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:29:35 2015 No.2135359 >>2135356 >not drawing as you occasionally look up and see if they have responded It's not that hard you know.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:34:33 2015 No.2135364

>>2135354
You're right. However, sexual arousal needs to be its sole purpose.

Drawing a set of tits for your hf account is drawing porn. Doing a study of a set of tits is not.

Also, by your standards, a video of a fully clothed toothless nun suggestively slobbering over a banana could be argued to be softcore porn.

I'm not even sure what you two are debating but nudity is not porn.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:37:16 2015 No.2135365 >>2134914 This is shopped, OP got this from exhentai, not patreon

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:37:27 2015 No.2135367

>>2135348
Urban dictionary.
Yeah, now you're fucking reaching for straws, you ignorant cunt. I'm guessing you're too young to remember, but softcore porn generally referred to the non-explicit shit they showed on cable before, with tits and simulated sex, but no genitals. That's what he's referring to be no "actual sexual activity".
Furthermore, by your definition, every webcam slut would be a pornographic actress.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:38:34 2015 No.2135370 >>2135050 Those abs look inverted. Like he has negative abs or something.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:39:16 2015 No.2135371 >>2135364 >Drawing a set of tits for your hf account is drawing porn. No, it's not.

Anonymous Sun Jun 28 10:44:30 2015 No.2135371,1 [INTERNAL]

>>2135364
Yes, I fully agree with you, a study of a pair of tits with the intent of getting better at drawing is definitely not pornography.

Drawing a set of tits with the intent to arouse people could be considered softcore porn.
>>2135367
>Uses Meriam-Webster as a source
>WOW URBAN DICTIONAIRY?? REALLY????
It's is literally the definition of words that are most commonly accepted in the world; the majority; basically most people in the world would say you're wrong.
>>2135371
See above.

>>	Anonymous Sun Jun 28 11:32:19 2015 No.2135371,2 >>2135371,1 Suck a cock dude.

Advanced search
Text to find
Subject [?]Search by post subject. Leave empty for any.
Username [?]Search for user name. Leave empty for any user name.
Tripcode [?]Search for tripcode. Leave empty for any.
Email [?]Search by email. Leave empty for any.
Filename [?]Search by image filename. Leave empty for any.
From Date [?]Enter what date to start searching from. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
To Date [?]Enter what date to start searching until. Format is YYYY-MM-DD
Image hash
Search in	All Posts OPs Only
Deleted posts	Show all posts Show only deleted posts Only show non-deleted posts
Internal posts	Show all posts Show only internal posts Show only archived posts
Order	New posts first Old posts first
Capcode	All Posts Only by Users Only by Mods Only by Admins Only by Developers
Results	Posts Threads
Action	[ Simple ]

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique