[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 129 KB, 776x966, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003294 No.2003294 [Reply] [Original]

Post your nsfw, critique others.
Ask advice, and so on etc. etc.

Last thread: >>1997926

Reminder that if you do not want to view this thread, please hide it by pressing the minus button or by right-clicking the thumbnail on the catalog and selecting "hide this thread."

>> No.2003300
File: 158 KB, 512x640, goblintitfuck.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003300

>>2003294
repostin

>> No.2003302

>>2003294
Someday I'll git gud at the gays like the OP pic. ;_;

>> No.2003305

>>2003300
The ears kinda seem disconnected to her head.

>> No.2003314

>>2003294
Not that I don't like this pic, I do quite a lot, but will this be a problem if it's technically furry? Do the furry rules apply to this board?

>> No.2003316

>>2003294
Where is this image from?

>> No.2003318

>>2003314
I'm gonna pretend they're wrestlers.

>> No.2003328

>>2003316
It's from the last pron thread on here.

>> No.2003331

>>2003328
Does this person have a tumblr or something?

>> No.2003337

>>2003331
Yeah I'm pretty sure there was a post chain linking to it. I think it might be gaben? Try ctrl f in the last thread, that'll at least put you on track.

>> No.2003365

>>2003314
furry rules are pretty lax on /ic/

>> No.2003373

>>2003314
We had multiple debates about the /furry/ subject. Its fine as long as it doesn't cultivate in describing being erotic with said character. Critique is why we are here, not to jerk off.

>>2003318
If you're a janitor, than take note of what I said up there.

>> No.2003382

>>2003318
>>2003365
>>2003373
Alright, that's good to know, thanks guys.

>> No.2003390
File: 37 KB, 525x481, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003390

>>2003382

>> No.2003413 [DELETED] 
File: 1.67 MB, 1131x1558, 1394432598480.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003413

>>2003365
Pony rules aren't though. The fact that a picture of an effeminate moth eating the asshole out of a burly ant is "fine" and a picture like this is not is most amusing to me. Last time I posted this image I got a three day ban, and I welcome whatever else these degenerate hypocrites have in store this time.

>their faces when

................................................_,,,,-------,,,__
........................................,,;:#ggg@@g;,..........‘`=-,
..................................,,;$#^`````*#@@@g;,.............’=-,
...............................,/$`................``#@@@#g,...............‘\,
........................._,;f`.......................,$@@@@#g,..............“\,
....................,/*&gp..+,_..................%*#@@@@g;,............’\,
................,./_`”>’.....`#$$#x;,............,%@@@@@#g;,..........`\
..............,/ (.............`\....`\”*=,``\.......*&*%@@@@@g;,..........\
...........,/...,^=*#q,_,/`\.......`~..`-.......g$@@@@@@@#g,........|
........../,;p8jq;,_..........;.........................`%@@@@@@@#g;....|
........,/.f,,,,_..`*8r-,.....;......................,&@@@@@@@@@#./
......./.,$ `\,...`.-...&..../........................`%@@@@@@@@$#/
.....,/,$--__........`\..../............................#$@@@##@@@@/
...,/\...`’t-,__,;>`..../.........................................;`=””=.`;@#*
.,/....`”~--~`’’....-`...................................,--”,~#-,.._*”`
(..........................................................,....`””......,;`
.`\,_.....................................................&`*-,,_-”`
.......`-,_................................................./
.............\..................................................|.

>> No.2003433

>>2003413
I think the reason mods are so tough on pone posters and furry in general is because you guys push against the rules so vehemently. Everyone else more or less accepts that you don't post /y/ on /u/, you don't post porn on blue boards, etc. There are some slight bends in the rules that most people use without abusing. But you guys pick a fight about it on every board and won't let up, as if arguing down the anons there will change the mods' minds. They gave you a place to post your topic instead of banning it altogether, but that's just not enough for you guys for some reason. It's not so hard to follow the same rules as everyone else.

>> No.2003443
File: 15 KB, 290x290, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003443

>>2003413
Ponies are an advanced breed of furry cancer. You can take your case to the mods, once we have a disscussion about it. Im leaning against it because ponies bring out the worst in people, especially non-sexually active bronies.

Ill be straight up, I love furry stuff, but I dont go around shoving it down peoples throats and shit. /mlp/ only exists as a quarantine zone until the fandom dies like the trekkies.

>> No.2003450

>>2003433
The fact that "x niche content" is "absolutely forbidden everywhere lol" is silly to begin with; saying that "you don't post /y/ on /u/" simply isn't comparable because those boards have a specific theme that are literally diametrically opposed to one another. An ant getting his asshole eaten out by a moth twink may be disgusting but it's still an illustration and shouldn't be any more against the rules than regular illustrative porn should be, or that illustrations of pretty, smiling horse girls should be for that matter. These rules are simply out of date, there was a time when posting a pony anywhere on the site would be a call to arms for dozens of people to be like "AW SHIT!" which would subsequently destroy any relevant discussion. With both MLP and furry I think that time has generally past.

>> No.2003456

>>2003450
The only reason it got to the level of "absolutely forbidden" is because people were spamming it like crazy in places it didn't belong. Spamming will always turn something into a problem, even if it matches the theme of a board, like what happened with Fairly Odd Parents on /co/. Not abiding by the rules in the first place is what made people get annoyed by what should have and would have been totally innocuous for all the reasons you just listed. Once people were annoyed, it was decided that there should be a place for you guys to post it where it wouldn't be disruptive to those who don't want to see it. You can argue about the fairness of that if you want to, but remember this is a privately owned webspace and all rules are arbitrary, just like if you went to someone's house, so the operators can do whatever they like and you have to follow their rules in their space; whether or not you think it's fair is Moot.

>> No.2003459

>>2003413
I thought they were rabbits..

>> No.2003460 [DELETED] 

>>2003450
>which would subsequently destroy any relevant discussion.
The only disscussion you pony fuckers have is /mlp/ simulator without the music.

>>2003456
>Moot
Nah m8.
He left, remember?

>> No.2003465 [DELETED] 
File: 272 KB, 1007x874, see u in three days nigga.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003465

>>2003443
>Ill be straight up, I love furry stuff, but I dont go around shoving it down peoples throats and shit.

If you define posting a single image as "shoving it down people's throats" than we might as well have the op banned for three days as well for their "flagrant disregard for global rule 3". The fact that you just "love" big gay furries with their big red rocket dicks flopping around everywhere but the thought of a cute horse doing cute things is "cancerous" is telling of how there can be such a discrepancy between how two essentially identical rules are enforced as I imagine the mods probably have the same inclinations.

>but remember this is a privately owned webspace and all rules are arbitrary, just like if you went to someone's house, so the operators can do whatever they like and you have to follow their rules in their space; whether or not you think it's fair is Moot.

Oh I'm aware of that, I think it's bullshit but I don't expect anything to change with these posts nor am I going to pursue this issue further, I just thought I'd bring it up because I'm still salty nigga~ How're you going to ban a man for three days for posting an image on an imageboard. Gnomesaiyan?

>> No.2003466
File: 806 KB, 1600x1200, 1425053666187.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003466

>>2003413
I like mlp but >>2003456 has a point.
Still if mlp isn't used for spamming why should it be "instant banned"? If I came here and asked for a critique for a mlp drawing, that's not me spamming, that's me using the /ic/ board for it's purpose.
Still rules are rules :/

>> No.2003472

>>2003465
>for posting an image on an imageboard
Nah I don't "gno" what you're "saiyan". There are rules. I got a 12 hour ban for posting futa on a blue board, even though the dick was covered and boobs were censored. That's how it goes.
>>2003466
If you came on here and asked sincerely for a critique and maybe gave a preface/disclaimer that you weren't trying to start anything and just really wanted help, you'd probably be fine, but the mods/jans might stop you if you started doing it regularly. Like I said there are times when people bend the rules and things are fine, but you can't divorce the current reality from the history that brought it to this point. 4chan prides itself on keeping people "honest" and well, as much as it sucks for those who it inconveniences, because even I've been tempted to ask for a crit on a pone piece here, we bear the punishment for those who abused the system before us.

>> No.2003476
File: 112 KB, 1280x1269, z.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003476

>>2003294
I've always wanted to know how to warm up before drawing and what particular studies I have to do to draw like this.

I feel like my gestures stiff and I'm afraid to warp proportions and body constitution too much.

>> No.2003480
File: 155 KB, 679x1000, computer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003480

>> No.2003481
File: 92 KB, 640x342, Become-an-internet-forum-moderator.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003481

>>2003472
>Nah I don't "gno" what you're "saiyan". There are rules. I got a 12 hour ban for posting futa on a blue board, even though the dick was covered and boobs were censored. That's how it goes.

...and I got a 72 hour ban on a NSFW art board for an illustrated picture of a smiling horse. You can probably see why I'm a bit annoyed. It would help if there was any kind of guidelines for moderation but as far as I'm aware there isn't-so any time some power-tripping mod gets a stick up his ass he can ban people for as long or short as he likes because "he's the big boss man". Pic related.

Anyway I'm going to drop this now because it's derailing a thread I'd never intended to participate in anyway. See you in three or more days.

>> No.2003483

>>2003476
>>2003480
wat

>> No.2003541
File: 254 KB, 1500x921, itsmeagain.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003541

So i changed boobs, eyes, hand. Looks a bit better now i think.

>> No.2003552
File: 301 KB, 640x480, TrunksFutureFriezaDebut.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003552

>>2003541
YOU DID NOT TOUCH THOSE TITTIES IN THE SLIGHTEST, I WILL NOT ACCEPT YOU LIES

>> No.2003553

>>2003480
This is the greatest thing on /ic/
fucking saved

>> No.2003555
File: 115 KB, 874x681, 4a7db4a03f72983bff9221ddf8574ff6.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003555

I want to draw this correctly but I'm having trouble with the foot and also the elbow placement (she's supposed to be holding her gun close to her chest)

I was thinking of making her butt/legs larger to fit in perspective better, as well.

redline and advice would be appreciated

I was gonna ask brekkist for help but he's sleeping atm

>> No.2003573
File: 848 KB, 1500x921, STIFFMAST.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003573

>>2003541
>>2003541
You realize your sketch has no concept of gravity in it? The tits need to be acted upon by an outside force, MOTHERFUCKING GRAVITY in this case, the pelvis needs to feel like it is actually pressing against the floor. I've made you a handy diagram comparing your drawing to other common objects that employ similar tactics to avoid the pull of gravity

>> No.2003584
File: 38 KB, 400x377, 8bf668be98b08e0d9fa48f8386d32746.600x.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003584

>>2003541
>>2003573
Also hover hands. If Newton were alive he would rain apples from the skye upon you until your resilient skeletal frame would be forced to buckele undere an orchard of vengeance reserved for only the harshest criminals that would dare defy the Laws of Gravity

>> No.2003586
File: 96 KB, 600x368, nogravity.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003586

>>2003584
>>2003573
>>2003552

>> No.2003587
File: 128 KB, 656x539, redline.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003587

>>2003541
This might help.
I think the pose is fine but there are things you can do to make it look more convincingly 3D.
Some of the things I did was angle the forearm and hand towards the viewer/
I overlapped her legs.
I showed her hair falling onto the ground and forming to the shape of it. Also it hangs around her face in a more convincing way.

also the boobies... I turned the torso more to emphasize them hanging towards the ground. Boobs are just fat sacks. You see anime all the time make them giggling messes, try to imagine a giggling mass hanging towards the ground, that's boobies.


I hope it helps, the redline isn't perfect but I hope it helps.

>> No.2003590
File: 210 KB, 1500x921, bent.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003590

>>2003573
Thanks for the diagram, it's really handy.
>>2003587
Nice redlines, but it looks like a totally different picture now.

Anyway, i tried to change her pose. Not so stiff anymore i believe.

>> No.2003591
File: 261 KB, 1500x921, bubs an boxes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003591

>>2003541
without bra, bubs would be a floopy like so

>> No.2003595

>>2003590
Why are you even posting when you don't take critique?
Your picture is SHIT, and he gives you advice on how to make it not suck total ass. How can you be such a faggot that you don't even take advice, when you're clearly an amateur and have skill far below the average on this board.

Anon, please, stop posting on this board, since you clearly don't want to improve.

>> No.2003597

>>2003590
I think my advice still stands, and if you don't want to redraw this picture just consider what I said when you move on to the next.
Try to make your 2d images look as 3d as possible and figure out ways to do it.
It'll help you better understand form and perspective

plus, a lot of artists don't do this. It looks more impressive and "alive" if your picture looks more like a human and less like a sticker.

Oh and I forgot to mention before don't forget the details in the ears. For elf ears... imagine a human ear but stretched out.

>> No.2003598
File: 200 KB, 720x442, ihavenothingbettertodothanbelittleothers.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003598

>>2003586

>> No.2003599

>>2003595
>since you clearly don't want to improve
But i'm changing her pose.
>Your picture is SHIT, and he gives you advice on how to make it not suck total ass
That's true, i suck and only started recently. I don't know much.
>Anon, please, stop posting on this board
Ok, i'll stop posting here.

>> No.2003600

>>2003597
P.S.S, avoid pillow shading and really think about your light source.
Not every piece of flesh has to have shading on/around it. Same as, not every area of dark has to have light.

>> No.2003601
File: 1.17 MB, 1283x958, 20150304_030616.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003601

how's this?

>> No.2003602

>>2003599
keep posting, be like tree that absorb smelly water and grow strong from it.

>> No.2003603

>>2003601
she looks pregnant

>> No.2003604

>>2003601
does she have three titty

>> No.2003606
File: 2.28 MB, 1283x958, 1234.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003606

>>2003604

>> No.2003607

>>2003606
The face is OK but you need to give her more of a chin but the anatomy is just awful, erase everything from the neck down and start again, I don't think you'll be able to recover anything from this. Have you just copied a face onto a twisted, broken body?

>> No.2003609

>>2003607
Why are you replying to me? I simply counted 4 titties.

>> No.2003612

>Draw fucked up fits
>Refuse to adjust
>Get a fuckton of helpful critique
I know what I am doing when I post my art

>> No.2003621
File: 1.62 MB, 1283x958, 1425467643900.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003621

>>2003601
Sorry it's messy but I hope this helps.

>> No.2003635
File: 1.06 MB, 1011x1280, rakakuza5.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003635

>that booty blasted ponyfag
lmao
Here's the conclusion to the OP, coloring critique welcome

>> No.2003639
File: 84 KB, 1360x768, americafuckyeah.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003639

>> No.2003642

So, who are some noteworthy nsfw artists?

>> No.2003643

>>2003642
kim jang jung

>> No.2003644

>>2003635
I'd lighten up the two picture-in-picture bits.

I'm guessing you did it so they wouldn't distract from the central piece, but the lineart version reads better imo.

>> No.2003645

>>2003639
The way that flag flies in the wind makes it look like a full-sized flag, which makes the girl look like a giant.

10/10 on the rest

>> No.2003647

>>2003635
o-oh, oh my.
What is your coloring technique? This is how I want to color.
How do you treat your lineart as well, do you change the mode or colors of it at all during your rendering process?
Also do you like sunibee? Your art reminds me of his but masculine>feminine

>> No.2003649
File: 112 KB, 658x494, redline2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003649

>>2003600
this is what I'm talking about.
my pen pressure isn't working so it looks like 100% ass, but hopefully it gets the point across.

>> No.2003654
File: 16 KB, 213x320, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003654

>>2003555
Lets see here..

You could have just sucked his dick to wake him up without him getting mad, lol.

>> No.2003655
File: 100 KB, 634x815, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003655

>>2003555
>>2003654

>> No.2003658

>>2003649
give her a pushup bra so these floating tits are justified
draw an arrow to show the light source, the left leg had a different light source compared to the tits as of now
I like her face

>> No.2003662

>>2003642
Legoman for bodies.
Incase for dick and fucbois

>> No.2003665

>>2003662
I really want to like Incase, but everything he draws is the same. I loved the halfling comic simply because he didn't sameface the shit out of it, unlike his regular stuff.

Same with Dmitrys or however you spell it.

>> No.2003669
File: 51 KB, 351x466, 5005d0d44aacc62e1f48e9c5550dfd2c.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003669

>>2003654
It's a method I've put into practice before, but... he just looked too peaceful ;w;

Anyway he's awake now so I'll ask.

Thanks for the reference, I think it'll help with the hand/forearms, I just need to figure out how to do the elbows convincingly.

>> No.2003673

>>2003662
link

>> No.2003682

>>2003662
I really wish Legoman learned how to draw appealing faces. Every single time he uses a different style the picture looks instantly way better.
>>2003665
Same with Incase, he overuses the lip-biting expression way too fucking much and it's not even erotic.

>> No.2003687

>>2003665
the fuck u on about, he makes a load of diffrent faces. what i dont like is artist who make load of faces because often lots of them are unappealing to me, i like one perfect appealing face. its like a tradmark of porn artist, you see the type of face and you know its him.

>> No.2003691

>>1999690
Someone has been studying ShindoL.

>> No.2003695

>>2003687
>actually supporting drawing the same face over and over
Literally scum.

>> No.2003696
File: 338 KB, 2000x1228, shadow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003696

>>2003658
>>2003649
Something like this?

>> No.2003713 [DELETED] 
File: 886 KB, 900x895, fluttershy illustration.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003713

>>2003635
However figuratively "bootyblasted" I may be due to blatant hypocrisy on the part of moderation when it comes to the enforcement of two identical rules pales in comparison to how literally bootyblasted your faggot ass must be. Enjoy your GRIDS cake boy.

>> No.2003714

>>2003696
Wow I really like what you did with the tits

>> No.2003720

>>2003695
everyone wants a perfect face not diffrent.

>> No.2003723

>>2003696
looks like ass

>> No.2003768

>>2003300
fingers look very strange
face is quite wonky

>> No.2003771

>>2003720
confirmed for not an artist

>> No.2003776

>>2003771
confimerd for not knowing what your audience wants.

>> No.2003784

>>2003776
>drawing for your "audience"
double confirmed

>> No.2003793

>>2003696
Nice tits.

>> No.2003794

>>2003784
>drawing

>> No.2003874
File: 718 KB, 1450x890, 1425477907418red.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003874

>>2003696
Add gravity to the tits man. Just change it. I think I cover most of my points in the pic. Not very erotic though, more like a regular reclining pose over pornography.
Remember that critique is just suggestion, obviously you don't have to listen, but since these are suggestions from human beans and your audience is probably also human beans you might want to try trying what people suggest.
Last suggestion: finish this piece up soon and start a new one where the focus is on some issue you have. Can be anything you think you have a problem with, popular consensus suggests you should try a piece with a focus on large breasts and gravity. K?

>> No.2003876

>>2003601
Study more anatomy, especially basic proportions and structure of rib cage. We should be able to see her right foot in the back, her left foot is messed up.
Exaggerate buttocks and breasts more. Hands don't look like they support her weight.
These guys >>2003606 >>2003621
got it covered pretty gud already

>> No.2003881

>>2003647
Check out justmegabenewells stream if you want to see his work progress. Sunibee also comes some times.
There really cool artist.

>> No.2003885

>>2003874
don't be such a vanilla person, it's a drawing, let it be idealised.

flat lighting and antigrav boobs are a proud tradition dating back to the dawn of time!

>> No.2003888
File: 226 KB, 1280x789, 1280px-Giorgione_-_Sleeping_Venus_-_Google_Art_Project_2[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003888

>>2003885

>> No.2003897
File: 358 KB, 1280x804, 1280px-Sandro_Botticelli_-_La_nascita_di_Venere_-_Google_Art_Project_-_edited[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003897

>>2003888
Think people fapped to paintings?

>> No.2003898
File: 492 KB, 748x1128, Crucifixion_Flat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2003898

This work is eating me alive

>> No.2003902

>>2003897
>>2003888
These are extremely idealized for their time.

>> No.2003916

>>2003874
About tits - there will be a bra.
Your light tips are great, thanks.
Redline is helpful too, i'll make some changes to the head, neck and arms.
>Last suggestion: finish this piece up soon and start a new one where the focus is on some issue you have
That's what i wanted to do.
I have issues with poses like many people here said, but i'm not really concerned about it, i care more about anatomy and making faces. I mean, what the point of making sexy and realistic poses if you can't draw arms or faces, right?

>> No.2003923

>>2003898
looks great, keep it up buddy. looking forward to seeing the finished piece.

>> No.2003989

>>2003635
Next OP pic, please!

>> No.2004026

>>2003897
this chick here
>>2003888
is fingering herself

definitely fap material

>> No.2004039

>>2003888
>>2003897
It was very outspoken and arousing for men to look at. But the women didnt like it because of soggy knees. The men of that era won over anyway.

>> No.2004042
File: 1.10 MB, 2000x1204, hey mid.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004042

>>2004026
yeah that's one of my favourite things about renaissance art. it's supposed to be all chaste and christian but they're always putting a little twist on it to make it the opposite.

>"hey georgie, make sure she's covering up her pussy, that'd be too much." ~wink~

"no worries mr. medici, i'll make sure her hand is really covering those sweet pink pussy lips completely! heh heh heh"

>> No.2004043
File: 39 KB, 500x375, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004043

>>2003989
K

>> No.2004045

>>2004042
Thick thighs are a novelty.
Sweet jesus

>> No.2004061

>>2003635
This is great, I'm so damn jealous. It sucks so much being able to draw well but be absolutely shit at coloring.

>> No.2004063
File: 19 KB, 250x250, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004063

>>2003673
For both?
Lets see.

http://lmsketch.tumblr.com
http://incaseart.tumblr.com

>> No.2004066
File: 12 KB, 201x199, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004066

>>2004061
>in the exact same boat
Its because I havent tried yet.
I need to fail in order to succed, but that jump into the new abyss is scary.

>> No.2004069

>>2004066
It is scary. The main problem for me has been that it's so draining. I have to sit there and mull over all the color choices and the rendering and molding the shapes. It doesn't come nearly as fast or easy as sketching. And even though that's to be expected, it makes me not want to practice. I'm trying to do more color stuff lately though because I know that's the only way to get faster at it. I just feel like I'm never gonna achieve that kind of polish and professional look though. Fuckin suuuuucks.

>> No.2004072

>>2003603
Oh dang, I must have been subconsciously affected by something.
>>2003607
No, everything was from imagination.

I really appreciate that red line, I'll go and get my anatomy up to speed and see what happens.

>> No.2004085

>>2003635
I have no words.

>> No.2004108

>>2003413
lol did they ban that guy?

>/ic/ confirmed furfag circlejerk

Not sure how I feel about this. I mean, bronies are obnoxious and are certainly faggots but furries are easily as bad if not worse. I'd love to hear the logic behind the selective enforcement of rule 15 and the complete dismissal of rule 3. Considering how disgusting both of these subcultures are it should either be both or none.

I don't come to /ic/ to be assailed with pictures of prolapsed furry rectums and anilingus, but if it's going to be allowed and encouraged as this thread has shown anyway we might as well open the floodgates to pony stuff too, to outright ban somebody for posting non pornographic pony art and allow this kind of shit is insane.

>> No.2004118

>>2004108
Bugs don't count as furry.

>> No.2004162

>>2004118
They are anthropomorphic; 'furry' is just shorthand for anthropomorphized animals, particularly ones performing sexual acts on one another, as it's alluded to in rule 3. Just because the mods get off on this kind of shit doesn't mean they should pretend some rules exist and others don't. Rules are in place for a reason and the mods are supposed to have the best interests of the board at heart by enforcing these rules, whether they spank off to anthropomorphic animal men eating the corn-filled shit out of other anthropomorphic animal men's assholes or not.

>> No.2004186

>>2003587
>>2003591
>>2003595
>>2003597
>>2003600
>>2003612
>>2003658
>>2003714
>>2003723
>>2003874
stop feeding the goddamn troll FUCKS SAKE

>> No.2004199
File: 794 KB, 1280x852, dp01.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004199

>>2003294
very inspiring OP pic.

>> No.2004205

>>2004199
really ?

>> No.2004227

>>2004162
The thing that really grinds me gears is when people try to rationalize that "scalies" or imps are a moral high ground above furries when they're really all just the same thing.

>> No.2004233

>>2004227
The hell are imps?

>> No.2004244

>>2004233
You know... imps.

The midget Midna is an "imp", so "not furry"

>> No.2004256
File: 47 KB, 500x375, HermesHuh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004256

>>2004244
She's NOT furry. Like at all. She's not even remotely animalistic. Sometimes she has a fang but that's a Japanese thing, a symbol that denotes a feisty personality or something like that, and she has pointy ears because every fuckin body in Zelda games have pointy ears. Besides that she has a normal human/hylian/whatever form that still isn't animalistic.You have a better argument for zoras being furries. Hell there's a better argument for Ganon being a furry. Imps are usually little demons or fairies, that's a whole different thing from a humanized animal, wth.

>> No.2004262

>>2004256
Who are you trying to convince here, friend?

>> No.2004264

>>2004262
An idiot.

>> No.2004266

>>2004262
Dude, literally wat.
Are you seriously gonna sit here and say that demons, fairies, dwarves, and the like are furry? Elves and midgets? Anything chibi? Anything that's not completely, fully, vanilla human?
You're absolutely trolling. I'll give you 4/10 because you got me to reply twice and got me even a little mad. Good job.

>> No.2004273
File: 193 KB, 527x348, 2015-03-04_14-37-11.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004273

>>2004256
but midna does have fur :^)

>> No.2004276

>>2004069
>>2004066
Ugggh. I'm (pretty) good at lineart, but as soon as I try to color, it's like I'm fucking retarded.

I know I'll get there if I keep at it, but I just sit there thinking that I'm supposed to be GOOD at art, not fucking useless.

THAT REMINDS ME. Back to fucking coloring. Uggggggggghhhhhhh. Wish me luck.

>> No.2004277

>>2004273
No.

>> No.2004287

>>2003541
i'm nowhere as good as you are, but even I KNOW that gravity affects boobs and can see how they should look.

>> No.2004289

>>2003635
0 stars
not an MK 2 cab?
get your shit together!

>> No.2004301
File: 199 KB, 255x144, 1413621547034.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004301

>>2004066
>>2004069
>>2004276
Well if it helps, I stream almost every night for around 4-7 hours coloring and I'll answer questions you might have and also get on mic and do short tutorials for specific effects

https://picarto.tv/live/channel.php?watch=JMGNfunbox

>> No.2004306

>>2004301
I'm gonna have to start watching these, then. I follow you anyway, may as well go the extra cyber-stalking step.

>> No.2004308

>>2004186

Most of the redlines were shit. They were better off just forwarding him to photo reference. The pose was so fucking generic anyway.

>> No.2004325

>>2003635

One of those cases where I can appreciate the art quality (granted the rendering doesn't really add much) but I really don't care about the subject material at all. Literally pony tier stuff. Anatomy is legit despite my disgust.

>>2004256
>Besides that she has a normal human/hylian/whatever form

You mean the form that people who aren't furfags like? Yeah. But the porn of Imp Midna outweighs the porn of True Midna because the internet is loaded with furfags. Go figure.

>> No.2004327
File: 41 KB, 334x295, oc.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004327

>>2003691
nah, I've never properly studied shindol; but his stuff is inspirational

>> No.2004328

>>2004325
Are you 12?

>> No.2004334

>>2004328

If I was 12, I'd be hopping on the bandwagon like some of the faggots in this thread.

>> No.2004344
File: 136 KB, 612x648, help.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004344

Please critique before i continue

>> No.2004353

>>2004328
It's not that he's 12, it's that his brain never developed past 6.

>> No.2004374
File: 1.49 MB, 346x261, Hamankek.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004374

>>2004328
>>2004353
>Not into furfag tier fetish shit
>must be underage

The irony of this is pretty rich.

>> No.2004383

>>2004374
No, whether or not you're underage isn't the question, it's your level of stupidity for classifying fantasy creatures as furry when they aren't fucking animals. It's not even about fapping to them or not, it's about you calling an apple an orange. By your idiotic "reasoning", even angels would be considered furry because they have bird wings. It's nonsense.

>> No.2004386

>>2003314
It's not furry but if this is not allowed, I will fight against that law till my last blood.

>> No.2004387

>>2004383

All fantasy creatures aren't created equal. I'm not even going to waste my time explaining that because it should be common fucking sense. Just because it's a fantasy creature doesn't AUTOMATICALLY give it a fucking pass. But you can hold onto that delusion. Whatever helps you sleep at night.

>> No.2004399

>>2004387
It's not the fact that they're fantasy creatures that "gives them a pass" it's the fact that they're NOT animals. They don't even fucking have fur. Again going by your nonsense, a vampire is a furry because it has fangs, and can change into a bat. I guess a witch is a furry if she has green skin or can change into a cat. The thing that'll keep me up at night is knowing how fucking badly the education system has failed, to produce a presumably full grown adult who can't tell the difference between an animal and not an animal.

>> No.2004418

>>2004399
>it's the fact that they're NOT animals

They are still inspired from them, some A LOT more than others. Hence, why all fantasy creatures AREN'T created equal. The only person the education system failed are faggots like you who would say Sonic is furry (despite them looking more like typical cartoon characters than resembling real animals), but give fantasy creatures as a whole a pass even though they are both take inspiration for the same shit (ie animals). You're basically saying Pokemon isn't furry because they are fantasy creatures and not actual animals. The delusion is heavy.

>> No.2004421

https://www.furbuy.com/auctions/1068682.html

Why aren't you all drawing furries yet?

>> No.2004437

>>2004418
>faggots like you who would say
Wrong, wrong, wrong. You don't know shit about me and you've got it completely backwards. Pokemon are animals. Sonic characters are anthropomorphized animals. Pokemon aren't given human qualities, they're treated as pets and animals in the show, so they're not furry because they're just plain animals, not because they're fantasy creatures. They're not even fantasy creatures. I don't mean fantasy creatures as a catch all term for anything that's like an animal but not real, I mean mythological creatures like unicorns and leviathans and shit that existed centuries before pokemon. I'm of the opinion that characters like Sonic, Looney Tunes, etc aren't in and of themselves furry creations because technically they're still recognized as animals in their canon, but furries adopt them and make furry art of them, where they humanize them more by giving them human anatomy instead of stylized animal anatomy and that's what makes the difference.

>> No.2004500

>look at wiki
>links to a dead site
>no useful links for drawing porn

>> No.2004516

>>2004421
Cant color that well

>> No.2004529
File: 54 KB, 323x454, 1377385462191.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004529

>>2004421
>460.00$

>> No.2004530

>>2004437

>Pokemon isn't furry
>Sonic isn't furry
>Looney Tunes isn't furry

Not that anon, but basically any porn featuring anthropomorphized creatures (fantasy or not) is furry by the very nature of it being an anthropomorphized version of a creature. That means OP is in the same tier as furry. Not to be confused with gajinka/humanization.

Sonic characters never had "stylized" animal anatomy. They all have noddle arms and legs with super basic torsos, much akin to Looney Tunes, with the same joints and movement as humans. In other words, they've always had stylized (aka cartoon) human anatomy with animal heads (with animal hands and feet in the case of Looney Tunes). Which is why giving them more human anatomy in their smut is such a simple task while still staying relatively on model.

>> No.2004536

>>2004516
>>2004529
Exactly why it's so easy to make money off of furries.

>> No.2004542

>>2004529
It could be a troll bid. Most of the shit on there isn't being sold for dick (then again that's probably the best piece there by a sizable margin so who knows). I bet the disgusting degenerate that drew the picture of the op could make a killing on this website.

>> No.2004544

>>2004536

The real question is why do furries have so much money to burn? Are most furries STEM field majors or some shit?

>> No.2004546

>>2004542
It's a real bid.
Furbid always has bidding wars at the end of auctions.

But only one good drawings. there's plenty of shitty art there that will never get a bid.
I've made thousands off furbid, and it didn't take amazing art to do it.

>> No.2004548

>>2004546
>one
I mean *on.

>> No.2004552

>>2004546
>Furbid
I meant furbuy.
Fuck is wrong with me.
Furbid closed down, but that was a good money maker too.

>> No.2004555

>>2004530
I said Pokemon, Sonic, Looney Tunes, Disney, whatever, aren't furry in and of themselves. Yes they are anthropomorphized animals. Yes they do have stylized animal anatomy, stylized in a way to mimic human anatomy, that's what anthropomorphizing is, and don't say it's not still intended to be animal anatomy because Daffy has wings and flies sometimes, even Bugs would hop around. It's like Iago in Aladdin, he gestures like a human but is still understood to be an animal, and in all these canons they're referred to as animals, but are treated like people to be ironic and funny. That's why they're cartoon characters. Furry is overly humanizing them to sexualize them, adding genitals and biceps and stuff. That's when it goes beyond cartoon anthropomorphizing. Not every anthro animal is a furry creation. But debating that kind of character being furry and something like a demon or elf being a furry aren't even in the same universe as one another, and that's what the problem is.

>> No.2004560

>>2004544
A furry friend of mine said a lot of them are in IT, apparently.

There were a few images of furry (scalie?) cosplayers with fucking luxury cars at some show that I cannot seem to find in Google.

>> No.2004591

>>2004555

>But debating that kind of character being furry and something like a demon or elf being a furry aren't even in the same universe as one another, and that's what the problem is.

You're implying most demons are based on real life creatures with that statement. Meanwhile elves are borderline ALWAYS based on humans in anatomy AND facial structure. If any of the two would have "furry" influences, it's demons, easy.

>> No.2004615

>>2004591
I'm not implying demons are based on real life creatures, it's precisely because they're NOT based on real creatures that I say they're not furry. They're not meant to be humanized animals, they're meant to be bizarre distorted inhuman forms meant to terrorize humans. They may have mish-mashed features you'd see on animals, like claws or hooves or tails, but that's because all fantasy is based a little in reality, and ancient people telling these stories mostly only had animals as a frame of reference. You can say "Satan is scary" then maybe you'll scare a few, but if you say he has horns and a forked tongue and red skin, then people have a visual aid & are horrified by these things coming together, and as uncanny valley proves, nothing disturbs us more than a distorted vision of a human form. That's not the same as imagining a plain animal taking on a more human form to have sex.

>> No.2004624

>>2004591
>>2004615
But at any rate, just to bring the point back to what got this whole thing rolling, the guy was saying chibi/super deformed characters are furry. There's definitely room for debate on whether pokemon or sonic are inherently furry. I'll give you that maybe some arguments could be made for demons being furry, since they have tails and wings and whatnot. But saying that a character is part of the fur fetish JUST because it's chibi is outright retarded. Period.

>> No.2004637
File: 22 KB, 300x188, 1421964345286.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004637

>>2004344

Head obfuscates upper torso and shoulders and makes it looks really fucked up. Head is also really big, even on a little person with 5-6 proportions.

>> No.2004652

>>2004615
Demons are based on real life creatures though. Everything in fantasy is based in reality in one shape or another for obvious reasons. It's simply a matter of what creature.

In the context of smut though, "demons" can easily be argued as furry depending on the design. Demon designs are too vast to generalize all demons as "not furry". They aren't like elves who are basically just humans with pointy ears. They are inspired by a LARGE array of real life creatures. It all depends on what they are based on (human or animal/creature). Some deep sea life animals look straight up like demon creatures.

>>2004624
Imps are more than just chibi humans.

>> No.2004661

>>2003590
Fuck you anon. His drawing that he probably did in 2 minutes is better than this shit and you didn't change dick. Get the fuck off /ic/ until you ACTUALLY accept critiquing.

>> No.2004669

>>2004652
Imps and demons are more than just animals with human bodies covered in fur. If we're going to go as far as saying anything that uses a non human feature on a humanoid character is furry, than any and every character that isn't a human or a robot is furry. Aliens are furry. Mermaids are furry. Monsters are furry. Don't give elves the exception, plenty of animals have pointed ears, so throw them on the fire too. Don't forget the versions of them that become orcs or druids or blood elves, they have a lot of animalistic stuff going on so they may as well be furry too.
As I see it, there's a clear intent with furry art to sexualize specifically animals, and I don't see that being the same as trying to add interest to a humanoid character by changing its proportions or adding features that may be inspired by animals. And he did say Midna is furry and cited her proportions as the sole reason. So I guess it ends here because I'm not changing my mind and neither is anyone else.

>> No.2004690

>>2004669
>Don't give elves the exception, plenty of animals have pointed ears, so throw them on the fire too.

Elf ears being points don't take away the fact that they are still based on the human ear and it's placement on the head (which is also based on human features). So yes, they are excluded.

>Orcs, Night Elves, Blood Elves

All of these races are still generally based heavily on human beings in both overall anatomy of the body AND facial structure. Not furry.

>> No.2004700

>>2004690
I agree with you. So I don't see how Midna, who is essentially an elf with gray/green/blue/whatever skin is therefore a furry.

>> No.2004706

>>2004700

True Midna, yeah

Imp Midna, no.

Not to say Imp Midna is necessarily furry, but she looks more like a pokemon creature than an elf so I can see why someone would argue it.

>> No.2004709

>>2004706
I want 2 fug a Midna.

>> No.2004711

>>2003635
>Mortal Kombat

Why doe?

>> No.2004759
File: 144 KB, 1200x1060, bj and the bear.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004759

>>2004327
not a bad sketch

>> No.2004761
File: 151 KB, 621x1208, saintclair 1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004761

I'm incredibly curious, can you guys actually get off on stuff you've made yourself? I've been wondering that forever.

>> No.2004766

>>2004761
No. I keep trying to find errors and how i could improve instead of enjoying the image.

>> No.2004769

>>2004761
By the time I finish conceptualizing and drawing something that I want to jack off to, I've already jacked of to its concept too many times to still feel excited about it.

>> No.2004770

>>2004766
So whats your motivation to do this stuff then? Assuming you're not doing it purely for dosh or whatever

>> No.2004781

>>2004761
Yeah. Even when I was still really struggling I could get off to it. Like >>2004769 said, sometimes if I get too into the technical side, when I'm done drawing it I can't really get into it again right away. But I look at it again in a few days and I'm good to go.

>> No.2004784

>>2004770

Not that anon, but I do the same thing. Too busy seeing/looking for errors to find my work hot. When it comes to my artwork, it's not a matter if I get off to it, it's simply a matter if I think it looks good. When I enter arting mode, arousal is borderline impossible for me.

>> No.2004797

>>2004301
Cool, will do.

>> No.2004819

>>2004761
When i Was way slower i was getting bored of it as it took me several days of trial and error, now i can do things in my comfort zone in 4-6 hours so i dont get bored of it before i masturbat to it.

>> No.2004840

>>2004761
No, never. Never been sexually attracted to drawings.
It's different for women in that visual stimulation does very little to arouse.

writing erotic literature would do the trick most likely but I don't care to.
I think making actual porn comics with story and progression would add to it as well, but as it stands, seeing naked people posed sexy and fucking does nothing.

>> No.2004846

>>2004770
Not that anon, but it's some weird desire to put my thoughts on paper. Also feels good if you can make someone else aroused by something you created that isn't your daughter.

>> No.2004863

>>2004840
>Never been sexually attracted to drawings.

Women aren't as visual as men but visuals still play a crucial part in jump starting fantasies and mental gymnastics for most women. Visual stimulation is merely the beginning of the process. It's not all that's needed like with most men, but it's still a crucial part.

The arousal comes from the ideas spawn from viewing the image, not the image itself.

>> No.2004865

>>2004863
>>The arousal comes from the ideas spawn from viewing the image, not the image itself.

yeah this is it.
I can look at a drawing for one second, think of the idea, and go masturbate alone with not stimulation for the next hour.

I wonder how men feel when looking at porn and what about it excited them, exactly.

>> No.2004874

>>2004865
it's entirely feels, so you can't really describe. how does a hungry person feel when they look at food?

>> No.2004877

>>2004865
>what about it excited them, exactly.

Sexual attraction to the particular form(s) on the female body. Men are hella visual so staring at pics of tits and ass while thinking of the idea is enough, generally speaking. Technically, thinking of the idea is enough after having seen the initial sexual image. However the more/varying images available while thinking of the idea, the easier it is to get off.

>> No.2004883

>>2004761
Nah, I couldn't look past the mistakes I make and would constantly think of what I could have done better.
I never get off to erotic pictures actually, I enjoy looking at and drawing them (duh), maybe it has to do with me being a woman and what's been already said above my post.

>> No.2004905

>>2004761
Works every time if I try to cater to my own tastes and in fact it doesn't then just work, but those faps are also the best ones overall.

However often I'm still too lazy or hesitant to start drawing despite the overwhelmingly successful track record with said drawings.

>> No.2004925
File: 301 KB, 1024x1280, jubei.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004925

Just did this for an anon on /h/. I'm still a beginner, so critique is most welcome.

>> No.2004950

>>2004846
>Also feels good if you can make someone else aroused by something you created that isn't your daughter.

I feel bad for the guy who made Elizabeth from Bioshock, because he was genuinely sad about all the rule 34.

>> No.2004986
File: 265 KB, 1250x1250, agrias.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004986

I'm beginning to think trying to line my chicken scratches is going to give me a bad time.

>> No.2004990

>>2004950
>because he was genuinely sad about all the rule 34

that makes me rock hard. ITs like im ntring him HUEH UEH EUH EUHEUH HEUEHUEH UEHUE

>> No.2004996
File: 35 KB, 350x350, 1422689531147.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2004996

>>2004761
It happened. Depends on the content really. If I draw something for a friend or a commission I usually don't care, but if I just go and draw the husbando I'm constantly turned on like a total slut.

>> No.2005006

>>2004761
>draw straight porn
>Meh. At least it looks kinda okay.
>draw gay porn
>hard as diamonds

Ive only done the gay drawing once, but it was scary how much my dick reacted to it.

>> No.2005012

>>2004996
>>2005006
lewd gay homo sluts.

>> No.2005017

>>2005012
I dream of crushing some mad boipussy.
Girls just dont do it for me now.
Ive been in a relationship with a girl, but not IN a relationship with a girl. I mean, I fucked my first dude in 8th grade. Fucked my last in 12th grade.
Ive been without boipussy for 2 years

>> No.2005361
File: 120 KB, 894x1500, allahusnackbar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2005361

did some pussy studies

they look wrong ?

>> No.2005371
File: 591 KB, 872x3557, vagina_toot_by_mldoxy-d7mneer.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2005371

>>2005361

>> No.2005375

>>2005371
ive got this toot...

>> No.2005531
File: 194 KB, 855x1000, Hanyu_draw_c.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2005531

>>2004761
Depends, usually forget about getting excited when I'm in the middle of the work, but since I'm pretty much drawing what turns me it works the rest of the time.

Did today otherwise.

>> No.2005537

>>2005531
>that dick

There is no excuse for that dick to be that poorly drawn. Reference is all over the damn internet.

>> No.2005542

>>2005537
That was obviously intended. Used some artists I like who draw them this way as references for it.

>> No.2005635

>>2005542
get rid of those vains it hurt too look at it its like it was dipped in atomic wastes.

>> No.2005643

>>2005635
>its like it was dipped in atomic wastes.

Some people sure can relate anything to anything.

>> No.2005671

>>2005635
>>2005643
I'd just like to step in and say I like it. Aesthetically it reminds me of The Guyver, and I love the look of that comic.

>> No.2005754
File: 203 KB, 1175x1300, satokass.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2005754

Tried a more complicated perspective for this one, was harder than I expected, could have looked better too.

>> No.2005757

>>2005542
>obviously intended

So you intentionally made it look like shit? I understand veiny dicks but veiny dicks don't look like that. That dick literally looks like it's plagued with STDs.

>> No.2005759

>>2005757
Stop saying it like your opinion is a fact.

>> No.2005762

>>2005754
Her face looks like a granny, not sure if that was intentional.

Also those giant pustules on her ass

>> No.2005764

>>2005762
shine effect. Does it looks bad ? Felt like it worked for the breasts here : >>2005531

>> No.2005768

>>2005759
Stop having such shit opinions?

>> No.2005790
File: 243 KB, 1175x1300, satokass_lewd.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2005790

>>2005754
lewder version.

>> No.2005889

>>2005764
the super hard shine always looks like white heads or boils to me

try a softer brush

>> No.2005919

Test

>> No.2005920

>>2005754
Pimple _butt

>>2005790
Spanked by stressed out dad and mom wont relive him of his stress _butt

>> No.2005933
File: 278 KB, 741x1000, wendy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2005933

A sketch I really liked.

Do people ever commission art that's not of already established IPs?

>> No.2005938

>>2005933
Neat.

People commissioning OCs is pretty common.

>> No.2005991

>>2005531
I like this. Blog?

>> No.2005993

>>2004950
Should have prepared himself. Can't say I don't feel bad for him though since sometimes characters you spend enough time on end up being close to your progeny or better.

>> No.2006079

>>2005933
>that left leg

i understand exagerrated hips but that she is asymmetrical as fuck

>> No.2006091

>>2005933
>perfectly fappable animu body
>shitty cartoony face
Why?

>> No.2006112

>>2006091
>shitty cartoony face

Why do you have such shit opinions anon? Typical animu is garbage.

>> No.2006131

>>2006112
This. Anime is cancer.

>> No.2006132

>>2006131
>>2006112

You are both cancer.

Animu is Life, Animu is Love.

>> No.2006140

>>2006112
>>2006131

The guy is retarded, you both kind of are too.
That drawing could still easily be "anime". He made a separation in the anime that doesn't exist and you followed it like it was a thing.

>> No.2006179
File: 257 KB, 741x1000, wendy by Xebec.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006179

>>2006140
>That drawing could still easily be "anime"
Now it is. No need to thank me.

>> No.2006191

>>2006091
Animu body, with semi realistic face is da best.

>> No.2006196
File: 169 KB, 855x1000, hanyuu redline.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006196

>>2005531
That dick looks like a serious boil burn victim with his skin falling apart.

Veins are supposed to have some sort of flow and direction, those are just gnarly wrinkles randomly cluttered on the surface of that dick.
The tip could use some reworking as well.

When drawing veins, think of tree branches or forked lightning.

>> No.2006201
File: 40 KB, 513x592, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006201

>people actually have veins on their dick
Its all silky smooth for me.

>> No.2006202

>>2006201
I guess you've never had a truly full erection.

Or is it a feminine penis you have?

>> No.2006203

>>2006201
bigger your dick is, more veins you have. So guys with very small dicks have almost none.

>> No.2006205

>>2006201
start taking viagra

>> No.2006207
File: 230 KB, 835x1200, FemSonic_naked_c_color.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006207

>>2006196
I'm still testing some renders for cocks since I don't have much experience with drawing those, especially for the veins. Until now, mainly did one big ass vein, wanted to test with lots of one here. Tough I understand what you mean, I'll do it that way from now, thanks for the tip.

Maybe that would worth the time updating this one too, I'll see.

>> No.2006209

>>2006207
the veins only show when its full erect you stupid fucking nigger cunt. and judging by the perspective the penis is in a flaccid position, if it was actually erect it would be foreshortened.

>> No.2006210

>>2006209
I do have some veins even in flaccid state tough.

>> No.2006213

>>2005361
Its not bad.

>> No.2006214

>>2006079
Not sure what you mean

>>2006091
It's all the same.

>>2006179
>wendy by xebec

Did you...put your name on my drawing?

>> No.2006215

>>2005361

I love the squishy volume to your shapes bro. Nice as fark

>> No.2006232
File: 50 KB, 407x444, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006232

>>2006202
I have full erections, but my veins dont pop out a lot, even at all. I fucked fucbois before.

>>2006203
You got me slim. Im 5 1/2 inches erect.
Im 2 inches when deflated.

>>2006205
I suppose

>> No.2006259
File: 14 KB, 354x352, 1414734510592.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006259

>>2006232
> You got me slim. Im 5 1/2 inches erect.
> Im 2 inches when deflated.

No wonder you don't have much veins, 5 1/2 is my flaccid size.

>> No.2006267

>>2006259
haha same, 10 inch master race reporting in.

>> No.2006304
File: 5 KB, 258x155, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006304

>>2006259
>>2006232

>tfw black too

>> No.2006305

>>2006304
you dun goofed

>> No.2006317

>>2006304
> black
I'm not.

>> No.2006331

>>2006132
Ugh just kill yourself. Your life holds no purpose.

>> No.2006341

>>2006214
>Did you...put your name on my drawing?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Xebec_%28studio%29
It's a studio known for making healthy animu girls without noses.

>> No.2006346
File: 261 KB, 855x1000, Hanyu_draw_c2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006346

>>2005531
So, ended up updating this one after all, thanks to >>2006196 for the few tips.

>> No.2006352

>>2006346
The head looks fine now, but those veins...
They remind me of some kind of coral pattern.

>> No.2006359

>>2006346
Fuck the penis, fix that fucking HAND

>> No.2006360

>>2006346
At this point someone should probably note that the breasts are not of equal size.
>in b4 "perspective"

>> No.2006368

>>2006359
Could have been more detailed but it seems fine.

>>2006360
yeah, you said it, look at the overall body.

>> No.2006375

>>2006368
>but it seems fine.
You lost me there.
>look at the overall body.
So? What there is to look at?
If you were to go with the size difference of the breasts and try to explain it with perspective alone, the overall picture would look quite different because how strong the perspective would be.

Don't tell me you can't see it without the help of redlines.

>> No.2006379

>>2006368
If that seems fine to you then m8 you aint gonna make it

>> No.2006386
File: 43 KB, 276x268, 00c.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006386

>>2006379
fuck, I know I could have done it way better, is it that wrong to feel lazy about not wanting to draw a perfect hand ?

>> No.2006389

>>2006386
No you're right, just keep drawing them like that. It's fine.

>> No.2006394
File: 278 KB, 923x1000, Tatsumaki_backH.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006394

>>2006389
I didn't say that. Okay, this one needs a bit of tweaking, but usually my hands are fine I think.

>> No.2006395

>>2006386
I draw lousy hands from time to time, even if I can draw them well if I put enough effort to them.
The questions you should ask from yourself should be "Is this hand good enough to give it a passing grade? How much does it matter in the picture anyway?"

Personally I would demand a little better looking hand for that drawing.

But better hands come easier with practice, so try to draw a very good hand (in different poses and tasks) every once in a while at least so that you'll improve at them.

>> No.2006412

>>2006386
REMOVE CANCER FROM DICK.

IT. HUTRTS. TO. LOOK AT IT. IT LITERALY HURTS ME WHEN I LOOK. remove cancer and it will be fine.

>> No.2006415

>>2006412
No.

>> No.2006418

>>2006415
GOOD LUCK NOT KILLING YOUR AUDIENCE.
GOOD LUCK ON NOT BEING PROSECUTED FOR GIVING DICK CANCER.

>> No.2006420
File: 19 KB, 220x220, jew_basic.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006420

>>2006412

>> No.2006426
File: 253 KB, 758x720, 1417810368437.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006426

>>2006412
>>2006418

>> No.2006431 [DELETED] 
File: 36 KB, 555x350, di-ntzh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006431

Ah, my mistake.

>> No.2006433

>>2006341
my mistake

>> No.2006434

how do you guys draw porn when you're so horny by your ideas?
I always end up at the bed masturbating

>> No.2006436

>>2006434
you rack disciprine

>> No.2006440

>>2006434
I just stare at it and try to control my breathing. Or I take a fap break if I find it too difficult.

>> No.2006445
File: 1.81 MB, 457x321, 9588293493.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006445

>>2006434
>Masturbating in bed

What are you? A girl?

>> No.2006447

>>2006445
>not masturbating while being comfy

>> No.2006449
File: 68 KB, 500x597, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006449

>>2006434
I just fap or drink vodka.
I usually lean towards fapping because I hate getting boners in lecture and end up thinking about sex when I shouldnt.
Right now, my dick cant get erect because I fapped like 2 times yesterday, but i might change that.
A whole weekend without fapping? Ill try it

>> No.2006450
File: 49 KB, 400x300, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006450

>>2006445
Fat

>> No.2006451

>>2006434
I can't fap to my drawings. All I see are the endless amount of errors.

>> No.2006456
File: 196 KB, 855x1000, Hanyu_draw_noveiny.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006456

>>2006352
>>2006412
>>2006418
FINE, just take this veiny-less version already.

>>2006434
Directly get into it, when I'm drawing I still get a bit horny but it still feels okay. Then I usually fap a bit after stopping.

>> No.2006477

>>2006456
Much better.
>veiny-less
I can still see two veins!

>> No.2006484

>>2006434
I find the horniness actually helps. I stay looser and exaggerate more. Then usually I get a good base down and if I'm still feeling really turned on, I take a break and work that out, then if it's something I want to post somewhere I finish it up then or later on.

>> No.2006486

>>2006449
>Amber Rose

Gets my dick diamonds every time. I want my lewd girl drawings to have her figure.

>> No.2006496

>>2006456
how dose she knows its bigger then average. fucking slut.

>> No.2006497

>>2006434
I'm feeling way too horny lately, fapping at least 2 times a day and my mind is always full of lewd, I need to put a stop on NSFW drawing for a moment, this is getting problematic.

>> No.2006505
File: 46 KB, 489x700, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006505

>>2006486
I just found her this morning laying on my pin board.
Shes a goldmine for the "ideal" figure.
At least for me.

Who is she anyway, a model?

>> No.2006506
File: 856 KB, 1060x1512, 39134138_big_p2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006506

So I am really the only one turned on by this kind of pics ? There is something I find fucking arousing about monstrous cocks. bonus points for the dominative and overconfident futanari, even tough I'm usually more into heterosexual stuff.

>> No.2006509
File: 107 KB, 500x500, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006509

>>2006497
>not entirely horny
>fap out of habit and not out of desire

>try to draw a nice pinup
>forget the breasts
>"whoops" my brain says as he forcefully makes her hips narrow
>"oops" my brain says when he draws a penis on the figure.
>get hard

There is no winning

>> No.2006510

>>2006505
>dated Kanye West before he got with Kim
>dated Wiz Khalifa
>dancer

I'll let you put two and two together. I personally don't give a shit though. Her body is too on point for me to care. She makes good ref material.

>> No.2006511
File: 39 KB, 414x482, 1400114982282.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006511

>>2006505
id fart all over her i got some really stinky raunchy farts today too from all the pizza and icecream.

>> No.2006514
File: 26 KB, 500x749, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006514

>>2006506
I dont like em, no. I could see how someone could, but its not for me.

God help me, I cant stop fapping to shit like this. I dont even know what I like about it

>> No.2006517

>>2006505
i dont like her.

>> No.2006519

>>2006506
What do you mean are you really the only one? I like pics like that, and if you're the one who drew the veiny dick, I DID say that I liked the way you drew it originally.

>> No.2006520
File: 142 KB, 640x1356, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006520

>>2006510
Sweet jesus.
Id still.

>>2006511
Will she like it?

>> No.2006525
File: 30 KB, 384x449, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006525

>>2006517
Im actually open to more suggestions. This thread dies in about 27 more posts anyway.

Irl id probably fuck this first

>> No.2006527
File: 36 KB, 342x393, 14001149822823.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006527

>>2006520
If she likes long and hot hisser farts, extra raunchy with a very strong nuclear/plutonium after-stench and a slow vibration, its so stinky the sour aroma will stick to your taste buds and make your eyes water I swear to fuckin god I aint lyin.

>> No.2006529
File: 128 KB, 640x640, 10665463_849970791721347_2065999869_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006529

>>2006520
>tfw she's 30 and has a child

>> No.2006538

>>2006529
>you'll never look like this
Why live.

>> No.2006543
File: 263 KB, 500x747, 1394298997221.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006543

>>2006525
get some taste

>> No.2006546

>>2006543
> gook girls
> "taste"

>> No.2006549
File: 107 KB, 640x640, 10914456_874112285944493_1686365440_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006549

>>2006517
That's irrelevant to the fact that her body is on point, anon.

>>2006538
Life isn't a fair game.

>> No.2006558
File: 948 KB, 270x420, 9d17fa67c0b08a42e13c0cd10da78088.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006558

>>2006519
Was just asking. Seeing at how much people were complaining about veiny/monstrous cocks, it's reassuring not everyone is in that case.

Makes me think, what does people here think about John Persons ? I really like his style, there seems to be a lot of people who don't, but it's seems to be mostly about the "big black dick nigga racism" stuff, which I don't really mind.
I mean, he has got a detailed and cool style, curvy as fuck girls and muscular dudes with big dicks, the fact he's doing mostly the same stuff isn't really a problem since he's doing it very well.

>> No.2006563

>>2006546
>liking niggers
>taste

>> No.2006566

>>2006558
>John Persons

His subject matter isn't my problem. I'm cool with all interracial shit, fantasy or not fantasy because I'm not a racist faggot. What I can't stand is his stylization and the fact that all his girls are cut from the exact same mold.

>> No.2006567

>>2006549
but she has no hair
I love beautiful hairs

>> No.2006568

>>2006538
Thank god, who would want to look like a dude with boobs.

>> No.2006574
File: 153 KB, 678x911, a25ddd179e3b0fd2ec215c0aec3148e2f79a0f88.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006574

>>2006566
>his stylization
I'm not sure what is there to not like about it.

> are cut from the exact same mold.
Eh. I'm fine with that. I mean, this kind of stuff is more about a sexy body anyway. Besides, he does happen to sometimes change the face structure.

>> No.2006575

>>2006567
>>2006568

Any woman who can rock short boycuts and still look hot is superior to any chick with obnoxious long hair. The longest I accept are bob cuts, any longer and you've got shit taste.

>> No.2006577

>>2006575
So you like dudes? It's okay, I like dudes too, I just don't confuse them with girls.

>> No.2006579
File: 53 KB, 376x536, 1413031274819.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006579

>>2006567
This. No hairs aren't my thing at all. They're part of a woman's charm.

>> No.2006581

>>2006575
but I like messy ponytails

>> No.2006582

>>2006577
>liking short hair means you like dudes

Last I checked, the defining features of the female body wasn't obnoxiously long dead cells growing from your head. I get it though anon, you've got shit taste.

>> No.2006583

>>2006558
I personally don't like Persons, I don't really like the way he does faces and anatomy, the interracial aspect doesn't bother me. I don't know, there's something about slightly off looking stylized anatomy that I like if it's slanted towards anime style, but not any other style. Like I said I love The Guyver but I can't stand the art in something like Daniel Clowes's books.

>> No.2006585
File: 1.60 MB, 400x225, 1416005427245.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006585

>>2006575
the length of the hairs doesn't means anything, it's the haircut itself that counts.

>> No.2006587
File: 128 KB, 493x802, u098-009.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006587

>>2006585
And of course, the overall look. Pic related is so great.

>> No.2006589

>>2006585
>length of hair doesn't mean anything
Of course it does. You get more variety in short cuts than you do long when it comes to framing the face. That's why long hair is shit. Pony tails I'll give a pass though as long as they aren't obnoxiously long either.

>> No.2006594
File: 206 KB, 664x990, mavis3d.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006594

>>2006589
You don't get it. I meant that shor hairs aren't better than long ones, and neither are long hairs better than short ones, it all depends of many factors : haircut, face, hair color.

>> No.2006595

>>2006589
Short hair suks dik and so does you're mom faggut xd

>> No.2006598

>>2006589
Long hair > short hair > no hair
The only one with shit taste here is you.

>> No.2006610
File: 24 KB, 500x749, Wavy-pixie-cut.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006610

>>2006598
Short hair > no hair > long hair

Get your boring ass vanilla shit taste out of here m8.

>> No.2006614

>>2006610
gay

>> No.2006618
File: 10 KB, 480x360, hqdefault.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006618

>>2006614

No U

>> No.2006621

>>2006595
To elaborate on this guy's statement...

>>2006610

My nigga, facial structure has a lot to do with it, Girls with long faces or heads, or very powerful nonstandard facial features tend to look like ass with short hair.

Long hair is a good safety style, it hides a lot of the skull's profile. A+ for borderline uglies/full uglies.

>> No.2006632
File: 1.02 MB, 800x776, 05978938189399.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006632

>>2006621
>Long hair is a good safety style, it hides a lot of the skull's profile. A+ for borderline uglies/full uglies.

This guy gets it.

>> No.2006634

You guys are being completely ridiculous arguing over what's "best" as if there could ever be one true objective answer. People have different preferences, and if that weren't the case we wouldn't stay diverse enough genetically to survive and evolve as a species. Arguing that your arbitrary preference is better than someone else's as if it's going to affect anything ever is completely pointless.

>> No.2006637
File: 773 KB, 260x221, 1349593858.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006637

>>2006634
>Not realizing this was all shitposting just to get the thread to it's bump limit.

>> No.2006641

>>2006637
But why even do that? /ic/ is so slow that even though we've hit bump limit, it's still going to take days for this thread to finally 404. It could have still been useful up to that point, or at least until it hits page 5 or 6.

>> No.2006644

>>2006259
Post your dick

>> No.2006651

>>2006641
DICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKSDICKS

>> No.2006654

>>2006621
Yet... pretty girl with long hair >>>>>>the rest

>> No.2006664

>>2006506
No, you are not. But I still like the futa cocks to not be completely misshapen. Your example is kind of borderline.

>> No.2006666

>>2006654

Wrong. Pretty girls can rock any hair style and look good regardless. Making the amount of hair almost irrelevant. Only ugly chicks NEED long hair because it makes them look better. Long hair can make you think an ugly chick is pretty. Without it, they look like shit.

>> No.2006688
File: 165 KB, 600x800, raz.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006688

before this thread dies I have one dire question to ask: is my shit fappable
if not, where can I improve

>> No.2006689
File: 114 KB, 984x798, gg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
2006689

cmon guys everybody knows that long hair is the best hahaha
>>2006688
not as it is

>> No.2006696

>>2006688
It's pretty well drawn, but frankly I'm not seeing anything visually "erogenous" about the drawing.
You would have to be super desperate to get off on this, or something.

I would demand more curves and definition (subtle or not) and more finer details in general.

Or better yet: some continuation!

>> No.2006731

>>2006525 here
15 posts over the bump limit.
Good job guys.
Ill make a new thread, after ai check the catalog

>> No.2006745

>>2006688
Face is nice. It looks like you have what it takes to draw something fappable, but this drawing isn't it. You could improve it by suggesting some movement with simple lines and making Raz's bulge more prominent.

Also I have to say that looks absolutely nothing like Raz. If I felt the need to jack it to Raz, this style wouldn't cut it.

>> No.2006747

>>2006746
>>2006746
>>2006746

>> No.2006822

>>2006394
OPM fanart, nice!