Dave Rapoza made a gumroad tut...

[Anonymous No.1777992]

Now everything someone do in a simplified painting is stealing Dave's style.
Yeah right, because every anime ever made wan'st exactly painted like this before Dave Rapoza "inventing" this style.

Same thing goes for Anthony Jones, that will be associated with any work that heavily rely on the smudge tool from now on.

That community is so full of shit..

[Anonymous No.1778004]

>>1777992
>learns ONLY rendering style of artists from tuts
You're bretty gud at learning I see

[Anonymous No.1778006]

>>1777992
>That community is so full of shit..
Quit, whiny bitch

[Anonymous No.1778014]

>>1777992

did dave actually bitch about it like that?

did anthony jones actually bitch about smudge tool use like it was "his thing" ? because i've been using it heavily before even know about AJ.

also:
a) AJ is kinda bad (only does characters somewhat decently)
b) dat leg lenght disparity on this witch
c) gumroad is starting to fucking annoy the shit out of me

[Anonymous No.1778017]

>>1778014
>gumroad is starting to fucking annoy the shit out of me
>mfw Kuciara tuts are immensely helpful

[Anonymous No.1778256]

>>1778014
No, other people are starting to call the styles to look like AJ and Dave styles, as if it was something entirely new.
Also, there is nothing wrong with the leg.

[Anonymous No.1778265]

yeah apparently for some people style = tools.
You get anthony jones look just by using a default hard round plus a soft smudge tool. wow what a personal style .
Also if you happen to use a default round brush with no pressure for your lines apparently youre copying someone else who did it before you top kek

[Anonymous No.1778269]

>>1778265
Stop making up problems where there are none. Never have I heard anyone complain about these things you mention. Not once.

[Anonymous No.1778297]

>>1778265
>Also if you happen to use a default round brush with no pressure for your lines apparently youre copying someone else who did it before you top kek

So everyone's shadow of Thomas Knoll.
Ultra top kek

[Anonymous No.1778312]

>>1778269

You see those things in facebook. Also, Dave just released his tut, wait and I'll see.

I already saw people right here in /ic/ calling someone AJ, so it's happening.

[Anonymous No.1778728]

What in the actual fuck is with that leg?

[Anonymous No.1778739]

>>1778256

>Nothing wrong with the leg.

Nigga wat.

[Anonymous No.1778760]

>yfw Anthony Jones actually read through the first thread on /ic/ where everyone was leeching off people who bought his gumroad tuts

We've got some buttfuckers in our midst.

[Anonymous No.1779051]

>>1778728
It seems very obvious what is wrong with that leg, it's too long. You must be unbelievably shitty and blind if you have to fucking ask.

[Anonymous No.1779139]

>>1777992
...bitching...so...lonely...community...

[Anonymous No.1779141]

Will there be cgpeers gumroad pack sometime soon?

[Anonymous No.1779146]

>>1779051
You must be unbelievable bad, of those kind who thinks they're any good, we have lots of that here in /ic/.
Seriously, you don't know shit about design/character design. The legs are so obviously drawn this way to be more creepy and not to be proportionally correct with human anatomy. Her arms are elongated too, btw.
Now go back to study before trying to critique a professional work you don't know a damn about.

[Anonymous No.1779153]

>>1779146
Reading comprehension you fucking moron. I'm not even criticizing Dave's work, I'm simply answering this idiot (probably you) who mentions something is "wrong" with the leg. What he notices as wrong is that the leg is elongated. God damn you are stupid.

[Anonymous No.1779156]

>>1779051
Anon I know its too long, thats why I was asking, how the author could fuck it up so badly.

[Anonymous No.1779160]

>>1779146
>character design hurrdurr
Yeah, thats why one leg is 30% longer than the other, haha 10/10 anon.

[Anonymous No.1779162]

>>1779146
Hey Dan, are you gonna git gud anytime soon?

[Anonymous No.1779164]

>>1779160

You're making a fool of yourself, please stop. Learn how bone structure works before stating something like this. I would do a red line to show you, but you don't deserve that much time.

>>1779153
Where is your fucking read comprehension? I don't think there is anything wrong with the leg, and if someone think it is, it's because hes not able to critique on anatomy yet.

[Anonymous No.1779165]

>>1779153
>>1779156
>>1779160
it is also positionally impossible for the left foot to be where it is. especially with the knee pointing towards us.
just goes to show that draing is a different game from painting. i doubt dave would have missed that mistake if he painted the image

[Anonymous No.1779171]

>>1779160
who the fuck cares,
Design > 100% Anatomy Accuracy

[Anonymous No.1779177]

Anatomy is generally very wonky and its hard to tell what is on purpose, ie. the tighs. That leg and foot though are obvious errors/lack of proper ref.

[Anonymous No.1779179]

>>1779171
>nonfunctional
>design

[Anonymous No.1779185]

>>1779177
You need to study more before trying to do a red line over a drawing. Your proportions are fucked up, you don't understand bone structure and the drawing would look like shit if followed your lines. lol

[Anonymous No.1779186]

>needing a tutorial to figure this style out
this is like when james jean posted his process and people still didn't get it. good for dave though; free money. maybe he can finally finish skull and shark now

[Anonymous No.1779187]

>>1779177
anon...

[Anonymous No.1779189]

>>1779185
Are you seriously this retarded? Redline pointing out anatomy errors in the drawing, not making lines to follow.

And it seems like in your mind knowing bone structure means thinking femur lengthens at will.

[Anonymous No.1779214]

>>1779177
I humbly believe that the fact the foot leaves the picture is a clear message that it was done on purpose. I don't know much about Rapoza but I've watched a few of his critic videos from a few years back, and he looked like he got off to putting jokes and cheesy shit in his work.

[Anonymous No.1779225]

>>1779185
Are you retarded? I'm not even the anon who did the redline but it is painfully obvious that it is more correct than the original. The original looks so wrong--the femur snaps halfway through so the leg comes towards us strangely and the entire thing is extremely long. Rapoza plain old fucked up, the perspective of the foot placement doesn't work at all and wouldn't be able to support the creature.

[Anonymous No.1779243]

>>1779185
Seems like you need to start learning anatomy kek, Loomis seems a good place to learn basic proportions.

[Anonymous No.1779263]

>>1779225
Not that anon, but I don't think it's more correct. He just changed the direction the leg is pointing, which is not what Dave tried to accomplish.
Did this in paint, so sorry for the bad quality, but just measure the femur length, it's just a little bit extended, looks fine to me.

[Anonymous No.1779267]

>>1779263
You cant be serious

[Anonymous No.1779311]

>>1779267
then do your own revision if you are better than him

[Anonymous No.1779313]

>>1779311
Die in a fire. Remember; not smoke inhalation.
Burn.

[Anonymous No.1779316]

Itd be cool if dan warren kept jumping on dave rapoza and made him cry like crazy and dan would be like fuck u cry baby

[Anonymous No.1779320]

>>1779267
I am... Do your version, show the bone structure in a better way, please.

[Anonymous No.1779331]

>>1779320
>>1779311
>>1779267
>>1779313

jesus christ people. you don't need a fucking redline for this. just look at the position of the right foot and the position where the left foor enters the water. it's wrong beyond any reasonable doubt.

[Anonymous No.1779341]

ITT so many apologists and fanboys that cant see obvious errors and babble about bone structure and shit

[Anonymous No.1779346]

[Anonymous No.1779348]

Did any of you even buy the tutorial? He says himself he wants that wonky and almost broken boned anatomy. It aids the idea of this character.

Typical /ic/ I guess. Only goes by the book. Too afraid to try things outside that scope and experiment/push the limits of their understanding.

[Anonymous No.1779350]

>>1777992
I can pose like that, it's uncomfortable but plausible, even more so with that anatomy.

[Anonymous No.1779354]

>being this autistic about anatomy in a picture where it looks good anyway and doesn't matter
jesus christ

[Anonymous No.1779377]

>>1779348
I bought, he says it and I already posted he choose to do it this way, but people here know more about character design than someone working in the high ranks of the industry.

>>1779350

This. It's completely plausible, even more when he purposely made the pose uncomfortable to look at for the creepiness factor it adds to the character. Also, as I said, the bone structure isn't incorrect. Maybe one bone is some milliliters longer than the other, but just /ic/ seems to care about it.

Just here I see people complaining about some anatomy differences from the human form in a creature design. It's like saying the creature in pic related is bad because his head and feet are too big. lol

[Anonymous No.1779378]

>>1779377
It's a boss painting, but let's be honest, those flipper feet are pretty shitty design. Just because it is Frazetta doesn't mean it is automatically amazing in every regard.

[Anonymous No.1779379]

>Did any of you even buy the tutorial?

Kek

[Anonymous No.1779381]

>>1779377
>Maybe one bone is some milliliters longer than the other

Blind as bat, quit art already pls, you will never make it.

[Anonymous No.1779386]

>>1779377
what about >>1779331

their positions in space just don't make sense. how the fuck can you not see that.

[Anonymous No.1779387]

>>1779378
I didn't said I like the design(although I like it), I said it was an artistic choice.

>>1779381
Yeah, right.
Show us the red lines, someone already posted what I meant for it being just slight longer, the other underdrawing someone did to show the error was deviating from the design, trying to fit the creature in loomis proportion. Clearly someone who just read the books but didn't had time to apply it yet.

[Anonymous No.1779388]

>>1779350
>I can pose like that
You can't, unless your left leg is longer than your right one.

[Anonymous No.1779390]

>>1779387
>Show us the red lines

Do you actually need a red line that shows one tight being much longer than the other?

[Anonymous No.1779422]

>>1779387
If it looks right then it is right. The inverse is also true. Although the low vp, her leg is too fucking long. It doesn't look right. Or her right knee should be pointing towards us to indicate foreshortening. It looks wrong, therefore it is.

[Anonymous No.1779430]

i'm almost split on the leg being a bad decision. i mean it is fucked, but if it was long enough, it would ruin the compostion
>>1779316
this must be drawn; dan & dave otp

[Anonymous No.1779493]

>>1779430
if he knew what he was doing he would have moved the right knee closer to the viewer maintaining comp as well as structural integrity

[Anonymous No.1779510]

>>1779493
i thought about that too, but that or a foreshortened leg fundamentally changes the shape language of the piece. if being correct for art nerds breaks your composition, is it still the right thing to do? as a design, this is nonfunctional; but as an illustration?
i doubt that he did it deliberately, but then again, dave has his anatomy pretty nailed down so idk

not trying to suck his dick here even though i probably would, i just think this is an area of thought we avoid here

[Anonymous No.1779540]

>>1779510
stop posting

[Anonymous No.1779570]

I was actually watching the tutorial and it was alright for the most part... But then I saw that leg and I swear I got dizzy, almost passed out at my keyboard. My head started to swim and all I could think about was that maybe... Maybe we should kill him? Maybe we should kill dave.

[Anonymous No.1779594]

first of when i see a dave thread its usally started by him or his fat friend

second, in the case of stylization and illustration especially for the general public readers, its only the 1%'ers that will notice the weird left left. that being said the entire figure is bent and squashed, i think the leg is meant to lead to to the next page like and arrow haha

thirdly thank you ic just fucken thank you

[Anonymous No.1779617]

>>1779570

yep.

[Anonymous No.1779655]

>>1779570
Upload it to mediafire it anon so we can git gud too.

[Anonymous No.1779712]

>>1779655
seconding to pirate it.
it's a huge deal for me to get money from real life to paypal.

[Anonymous No.1779715]

also the feet are absolutely tiny, yes? Isn't there usually a correlation between hands and feet? Because having such lanky hands and tiny feet look weird, especially since the feet would be closer to us. I really like the illustration in general, the colors and mood especially.

[Anonymous No.1779786]

>>1779570
Anon could you share the brushes from that tutorial?

[Anonymous No.1779803]

>>1779655
>>1779712
>>1779786
I'm only uploading these since they're the smallest. I more than likely won't upload the rest. Too large.

Brushes:
http://www.mediafire.com/download/ypv6cq3ehncoc9x/DavesBrushes.abr

Character Art Disclaimer:
http://www.mediafire.com/watch/lvva3xr3no1o7w2/Character_Art_Disclaimer.mp4

Basic Breakdown Nebula
http://www.mediafire.com/watch/620pisyb1cewuu5/Basic_Breakdown_Nebula.mp4

[Anonymous No.1779850]

>>1779803

Since you're cool enough to post up stuff, here's Eytan Zana's videos, everybody! merry fucking christmas

composition
http://www.mediafire.com/download/4rdd9umdp3dh96g/eytan1.zip

color and light
http://www.mediafire.com/download/ai34u2zitdmjza7/EytanCnL.zip

[Anonymous No.1779873]

Jesus christ, I knew it. I fucking KNEW it.

As soon as these gumroad tutorials started blowing up I said to myself "Yup ic is going to find something to hate about this"

There is a reason nobody here ever succeeds, it's because you all sit around rarely drawing and just hating everyone and everything even remotely more successful than you.

And then you spend the other 80% of the thread picking up rapoza's illustration. Typical irrelevant ic bullshit. LEGS TOO LONG WHAT A FUCKING HACK.
The difference between professionals and the crybabies on ic who just rinse repeat the same few irrelevant exercises forever is they know what works. Firstly, rapoza pumped this out live in no fucking time at all. Secondly, the tiny discrepancies that ic latches onto are meaningless, the image works on it's first read. That's almost literally ALL THAT COUNTS. You show this to anyone who isn't some self-obsessed aspiring digital art failure from IC and they'll think it's awesome, that's why he is an entertainment industry professional and you're not. If anything the extreme extension of the leg helps the composition and the line of sight throughout the image.

Seriously, if you idiots spent even half as much time just trying to make images that worked instead of esoteric garbage to impress ic's idiotic expectations you'd go much further with your art.

[Anonymous No.1779877]

>>1779873
Take it easy on your heart Dan, dont die before gitting average

[Anonymous No.1779881]

>>1779803
Thx anon

[Anonymous No.1779882]

>>1779873
>You show this to anyone who isn't some self-obsessed aspiring digital art failure from IC and they'll think it's awesome

nope. just showed this to my mom and she said "isn't this leg way too long?"

LOL!

[Anonymous No.1779889]

>>1779873
thanks. The same feel was up in my throat.

>>1779882
Yes, because your mom is the target of those type of illustration. kek

[Anonymous No.1779891]

>decrepit old swamp creature
>having perfect anatomy
Oh right, I'm on /ic/.

[Anonymous No.1779892]

>>1779889
it's really fucking long though, it's not a nitpick. it's almost the most notable thing about the image.

[Anonymous No.1779896]

>>1779891
HER LITTLE TOE IS TOO BIG HOW THE FUCK IS THIS GUY A PROFESSIONAL????

*returns to drawing hannah barbera era loomis cartoons for the next 8 years*

one day ill make it.... then ill show them!!

*wipes away tears*

[Anonymous No.1779918]

>>1779896
I mean i agree that most people on here are dipshits who argue anatomy and proportions without knowing either.

But that leg is kind of distracting, maybe it's from people mentioning it but it looks pretty fucked.

>>1779891
>they called my animu horsegirl shitty

[Anonymous No.1779931]

>>1778256

Even after Rapoza said he took a lot of the style out of certain anime/mangas/japstuffs? I saw Jon Rector trying it out saying it's the "Rapozza method" or shit like that.

I haven't seen the tutorial itself yet.

[Anonymous No.1779937]

to all the guys defending daves mega long leg

if it was a compositional thing he would have made sure to either describe the right leg as more twisted away from the viewer, receding into the background (a little cast shadow falling on the left leg for instance) or he would have made sure to make the right leg atleast REASONABLY comparable in lenght.

the lenght difference right now is too large it throws the viewer off. yes it's a monster yada yada, but the distortion hurts the image. simple as that.

[Anonymous No.1779940]

>>1779937

forgot pic

[Anonymous No.1779945]

>>1779937
not only that it's a super common error to make. you see it in like caravaggioesque stuff all the time too and i think most of us have made a similar error in our own work.

[Anonymous No.1779952]

>>1779945
Most of us aren't trying to sell lessons

[Anonymous No.1779969]

>>1779952
This literally has nothing to do with anything.

[Anonymous No.1779982]

i dont think the painting is that cool. id rather spend 20 bucks on someone who actually knows what theyre talking about than 5 bucks on a hipster like dave rapoza

[Anonymous No.1780003]

>>1779873

I agree, Dan.

[Anonymous No.1780009]

>>1780003
why is everyone calling me dan? I actually feel like I'm missing out on a good joke here

[Anonymous No.1780019]

>>1779982
Says the hipster. Tell us, what great obscure Russian artists that literally only you have heard of inspires you?
Be sure to list their names in Russian to make it even more obnoxious.

[Anonymous No.1780020]

This thread has been linked to Rapozas facebook I REPEAT YOU GUYS HAVE BEEN EXPOSED! Now you shall taste the steel of facebook fan boys.

[Anonymous No.1780031]

>>1780020
where? I can't find it.

[Anonymous No.1780043]

>>1780020
/ic/ can't even support a /po/ invasion with its 2 resident anons, much less a facebook one.
It's over, we're finished.

[Anonymous No.1780044]

I might be wrong on this but according to hales proportion system it just looks like stylised anatomy aka he used 4 cranial lengths instead of 3. AGAIN i might be wrong.Also everyone knows that loomis is beginner tier and after that is shit

[Anonymous No.1780049]

>>1780044
>123341234
>33
Not fooling anyone stylefag

[Anonymous No.1780051]

>>1780044
Spheres don't foreshorten in perspective, that you got right, but it doesn't mean you should put them each next to each other without any overlapping. Otherwise it would be impossible to ever show any foreshortening.
Once you take that into account, you should be able to see that the left leg is indeed too long.

[Anonymous No.1780056]

>>1780049

>mfw

[Anonymous No.1780060]

>>1780031
he posted a rant, look up his page on facebook its his most recent post

[Anonymous No.1780062]

>>1780049
u w0t m8
>>1780051
My mistake it looked like it doesent have a lot of foreshortening.But i wont fix it cause i rather be drawing than be butthurt about Dave he can draw ponies for all i care

[Anonymous No.1780066]

>>1780062
I'd rather be watching porn than reading your crap.

[Anonymous No.1780068]

>>1780066
Im just trying to be a rational human and not jump on the bandwagon without checking the facts myself and now im going to do some art and improve.And you can continue procrastinating on ic and not improve.

[Anonymous No.1780096]

>>1779873
blabla in the end, it's just wrong.
you talk about wasting time, but look who the first ones making the long posts were: it was the people who defended this piece. just look at how much energy you spend trying to defend this lame piece.

just by pic related ALONE you can tell that the leg is actually going towards us. the right shin and the left tigh should be touching, and it's barely possible. just try to imagine the front view.
and despite the left leg being foresortened, it's STILL that fucking long.
i find it absolutely amazing to which lengths you faggots will go to defend your everlasting idols.

[Anonymous No.1780097]

>>1780096
pic related*

[Anonymous No.1780141]

>>1780062
God forbid you ever enter an exhibit of mannerist paintings, or get a glimpse of El Greco's work.

Muh realism.

[Anonymous No.1780153]

Get a hold of this pleb.

Fukken nub amirite. He can't even into proportion.

[Anonymous No.1780255]

>>1780009

Shut it fatboy

[Anonymous No.1780272]

>>1780020
I dont see any connection between his "rant post" and this thread.

His rant is basically "buy my tutorial scrubs and try being me, its okay".

[Anonymous No.1780279]

>>1780272
there really wasnt any connection i know but someone posted a link to /ic/ so maybe some people came here to defend rapoza

[Anonymous No.1780283]

>>1780153

[Anonymous No.1780288]

Man, this Black Witch stuff is really tight.

[Anonymous No.1780308]

>>1780288
>tight
Not really, it's definitely muddy everywhere except the area of focus.
And no, that's not the "blurry out of focus" or "less detailed out of focus" which would be ok. It's outright muddy, which is bad.

[Anonymous No.1780311]

>>1780308
Now you're just being a huge hater faggot.

[Anonymous No.1780315]

>>1780308
Jesus fucking christ.

>urban dictionary
>Tight
>3. Stylish, cool, having everything together.

[Anonymous No.1780329]

>>1780153
Jokes on you, everyone except themselves thought mannerists were indeed the plebs of art. Even the adjective "mannerist" was used as an insult and they are still remembered as such today.

[Anonymous No.1780340]

>>1780308
>It's outright muddy

Not really. I can already tell for a fact that you will without a doubt NEVER make it.

[Anonymous No.1780344]

>>1780340
#rekt

[Anonymous No.1780373]

>>1780288
This is a really awesome piece. People talking about muddy just suck at art/try to be hipster with not liking whats objectively good because they are so alternative and stuff.

[Dave Rapoza No.1780385]

Hey Guys,

Only posting on here because this was linked from my facebook and I don't want people to 'stand up for me' which would be retarded. The leg is totally broken, I'll tell you that much, mostly because I realized the drawing was messed up hours into the thing and didn't want to sacrifice all that time fixing it and redoing the comp when I could focus on just relaying the technique. But yea, you're obviously right, the leg is super long. The tutorial is about the process and not that final image.

Nobody needs to be defensive for me <3. And Dan isn't in here, if he actually posted that I would've laughed so hard, what a passionate man.

Anyway, glad you guys are stayin vigilant, keep on studyin and workin at it. And keep in mind, I hated everything and continue to hate things just like you guys do. If you focus though and use it to get better you can easily exceed everyone who makes shit mistakes and doesn't care as much as you think they should.

With love,
Dave

[Anonymous No.1780390]

>>1780385
Nice try, Dan.

[Anonymous No.1780391]

>>1780390
Fuck you I think thats Dave.

[Daev Rapooze No.1780392]

>>1780391
Fuck you I think I'm Dave.

[Dave Rapoza No.1780395]

Of course it's me, you need me to hold up a picture of me with a local newspaper? I honestly support you guys. I think it's funny that it's all anonymous, but outside that who cares? We're all just angry people in cars saying whatever we want until we're face to face, then we're all nice. So at the end of the day who cares?

[Anonymous No.1780396]

>>1778017

Any other recommended gumroad tuts? I don't feel like spending 100 bucks and finding out only 20 of them were useful

[Anonymous No.1780398]

>>1780392
You should change your name Rave Dapoza. It's more metall that way.

[Anonymous No.1780399]

>>1780392
Fuck me I think I just shit.

[Anonymous No.1780400]

>>1780385
>>1780395
Hey Dave, what's the deal with you getting Dan's sloppy seconds?
He butthurt over that or something? You guys were all best bros for a while and then you never talked in public ever since you started going balls deep.

[Anonymous No.1780419]

>>1780395
how u get gud though?

[Anonymous No.1780449]

>>1780385

I think I like Dave.

[Anonymous No.1780485]

>>1780141

el greco is so shitty lol

[Anonymous No.1780498]

>>1780385

i want you inside me dave. no seriously.

[Anonymous No.1780570]

>>1780400
Atleast Dan actually has a gf with talent, Dave just gets a girl with no talent other than leaching off of others.

[Anonymous No.1780578]

>>1780498
wut

[Anonymous No.1780589]

>>1780485
kill yourself

[David Rapoozlestein No.1780620]

>>1780392
No!

I am the one true god!

[Rape Davoza No.1780640]

>>1780589

90% of his work is mediocre as hell, that is one of his few decent pieces.

[Anonymous No.1780648]

>mfw people are mixing up making fun of dan luvisi and dan warren

[Anonymous No.1780653]

>>1780570
At least Dave's girl is fine as fuck. She's a legit 9 possibly 10/10. Meanwhile Dan's girl is 7 at most.

[Anonymous No.1780655]

>>1780648
Both shit tier artists so it doesn't matter.

[Anonymous No.1780663]

>>1780653
>being shallow
>2014

[Daev Rapooze No.1780664]

>>1780653
Thanks, dad

[Anonymous No.1781281]

>>1780385

Here's the greatest formula to git gud - just pure hate all the time. Do your studies with hate. Practice while hating. Your pen strokes are now fueled by hatred.

Want to get as good as Dave Rapoza? Hate.

[Anonymous No.1781287]

>>1781281

i thought it was more something along the lines of 'get hate'. like when you get haters, you are close to making it. there has to be some truth in that aswell.

although it would suck to think that all the polish (and nonpolish) photobashing scrubs i hate with burning passion are even remotely close to making it.

[Anonymous No.1781288]

who is dave rapoza?
why should i care?

[Anonymous No.1781289]

>>1780020

>bunch of anonymous fucksticks feverishly debate and pick apart the image concocted for the tutorial
>thread linked to FB
>/ic/ expects people to come here and feverishly defend Rapoza
>most FB users just stay quiet and start thinking: "Yeah that leg is kind of long"

Rapoza: "Yeah the leg is kind of long. Fuck it"

At the same time this is somehow the best and worst thread on /ic/ right now. And at the same time Dan Warren is kind of fat.

[Anonymous No.1781291]

>>1781288

He's the guy who started Crimson Daggers, he's worked with a number of high profile companies, he created Steve Lichman with Dan. He also made those sweet Ninja Turtle pics which went viral like 3 years ago.

Now he's making tutorials to help people with their progress and trying to make Skull and Shark happen.

[Anonymous No.1781292]

>>1781289
>Dan Warren is kind of fat.

Dan Warren is 'kind of' fat.

[Anonymous No.1781297]

>>1781291
so basically nobody
thanks anon
so 2011

[Anonymous No.1781298]

>>1781287

Yes, the more haters you get the more you're making things happen for youself. But I don't think Dave was talking about that in his post. I guess you could call it a sort of hunger what he was saying.

>inb4 we pick his post apart with 12 different interpretations