[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 939 KB, 3520x2977, start.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610325 No.1610325[DELETED]  [Reply] [Original]

Anime/Manga/Cartooning Thread

"First, you need a plan or approach; second, you need the knowledge to put the plan into effect; and third, you must have the spirit to carry it through to completion." - Glenn Vilppu

Previous Thread: >>1606442

Try to keep calm, have a positive attitude and avoid making Kind Janitor-san angry!

A general message to aspiring artists: Don't ever think that you should stop attempting to learn how to draw because "it takes too long" or "drawing is just a hobby." Being shitty at your hobby is definitely not better than doing your hobby well, no matter what your laziness tells you. Have some dedication in what you love to do, damn it!

Submit your drawings, receive feedback or critique others! Share your knowledge and remember to thank those who've critiqued or red-lined your drawings. Most importantly, have fun.

This thread is meant for artists who might want to try to make stylized work in-between their studies. It is strongly recommended that you use this thread in conjunction with learning the elements and fundamentals of art. You can also discuss the visual elements of various professional artists as well if you keep it relatively articulate and civil.

>Fresh off the boat? Read the fucking sticky!
http://www.squidoo.com/how-to-draw-learn
http://www.squidoo.com/w-ic-i
>Proko
http://www.proko.com/videos/
>Ctrl+Paint
http://ctrlpaint.com/
>Hitokaku Index
http://www.asahi-net.or.jp/~zm5s-nkmr/
>0033
http://www.pixiv.net/member_illust.php?id=59317
>List of active livestreams
http://livestreamstatuslist.appspot.com/
>fellowBro's books
http://mediafire.com/?i44dwzkf9j9n8
>Tutorial/Reference Collection
http://pinterest.com/characterdesigh/
>Japanese Animu Tutorials
http://iradukai.com/
>Figures
http://reference.sketchdaily.net/

Remember the words of our good friend Glen Vilppu: “No rules, just tools.”

/ic/: "All pros use reference".

>> No.1610336

The cancer goes here.

>> No.1610337
File: 278 KB, 571x800, help.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610337

reposting i guess
i really need help with fixing her anatomy and the perspective
as well as her hands...

>> No.1610343
File: 87 KB, 228x218, 1386999986247.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610343

>>1610337

Is that a belly I see

>> No.1610342

>>1610337
is she pregnant? the massive size of the belly button and how the shirt rides up without a gap implies a massive baby bump.

Fix that and define your likes better and you're in business

>> No.1610347

>>1610342
>>1610337

The short shirt and belly ornament is part of the design I believe. You just have to define the hip and belly area better so you don't make Sayaka a chubby.

>> No.1610352
File: 114 KB, 701x718, ss (2013-12-15 at 05.04.19).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610352

Arms are meh.
>Katawa Fight Club

>> No.1610362

>>1610352
>Kenji is Tyler

>> No.1610367
File: 696 KB, 1069x799, icrl.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610367

>>1610337
Dunno, hope this helps.
You should definitely use the hair for motion too.

>> No.1610376
File: 509 KB, 635x791, icrl.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610376

>>1610367

>> No.1610446

Much aboulia

>> No.1610473
File: 2.64 MB, 2476x3504, 02.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610473

one tiny little picture

>> No.1610474

>>1610376

good redline

>> No.1610477
File: 2.67 MB, 3504x2484, 03.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610477

i´m looking forward to read your comments :)

>> No.1610549

>>1610343
well i for one welcome our new healthy overlords

>> No.1610550

>>1610473
>>1610477
be vary of the size of the skull.

For example, in your first one, the top left of her head. Considering the volume of the hair, it should extend a bit further

>> No.1610566

thank you :) i didnt notice this... next time i will try to do better ;)

>> No.1610570

>>1610566
>>1610477
>>1610473
>>>/i/ is the right place for you :)

>> No.1610613

>>1610376
thank you so much, this really helped!

>> No.1610710
File: 100 KB, 706x872, loli4chandoodle.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610710

loli doodle i did tonight... meh

>> No.1610726
File: 1.23 MB, 3518x2984, wut.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610726

Trying a different pen type than my usual. One layer doodle. Maybe I will go over in a thicker pen. What does /ic/tan think?

>> No.1610743

>>1610726
dem tumblr nose

>> No.1610747

>>1610743
Dem? Theres one

>> No.1610768
File: 1.29 MB, 3518x2984, wut.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610768

>>1610726
Inked it with my usual pen and I like it much more

>> No.1610769

>>1610710

Nice job Americanizing the fuck out of it.

>> No.1610770

>>1610769
That doesn't make sense to anyone besides you.

>> No.1610773
File: 1.30 MB, 3518x2984, wut.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610773

>>1610768
tweaked a thing

>> No.1610784
File: 1.67 MB, 3000x2000, rioooooo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610784

Ahh, this is the first time I've ever posted on this board. I've lurked a lot and I was hoping that somebody could help me to improve this.

The anatomy's off, I know that, since I didn't use any skeletons or such.Sorry for how messy it is; it's only the roughest sketch. I wanted to get some help and fix it before doing a better sketch.

>> No.1610785
File: 146 KB, 600x400, rioooooo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1610785

>>1610784
Crap crap crap, I messed up, I didn't resize it. I fixed it.

>> No.1610826

>>1610773
>>1610477
you guys should learn a lesson from >>1610785 and resize your images before posting so they aren't in an xboxhueg resolution

>> No.1610850

>>1610473
>>1610477
Find a source for the hair. Determine the shape and how it fits against the skull. Use longer lines.

The body for the first one is bretty gud by itself, kind of detached from the head though. Did you copy it?

Fit the clothes on after you draw her naked.

Kind of obvious you're not using any construction at all. Do some head perspectives and figure drawing.

>> No.1610871

thank you very much! this will surely help me.
but what do you mean with construction?
i erased all the sketch-lines and redid all the real lines to make it look more clearly, if its that what you mean
besides that i always draw them naked first and fit clothes on afterwards...
are the clothes too near to the skin?
im also not sure about the face-size compared to the body... is it too big? or shouldnt the neck be left out in these perspectives?

>> No.1610976

>>1610871
Click the post number to quote

>> No.1611053
File: 52 KB, 960x1280, 2013-12-16 17.10.30.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611053

hows it going with this one ?

>> No.1611055

>>1611053
epic

>> No.1611059 [DELETED] 

>>1611053
Hehehe I find this so cute in a way it feels like I am seeing this from the past :3 Sometimes I wish I were innocent again.

>> No.1611060

>>1611053
Hehehe I find this so cute in a way it feels like I am seeing this from the past :3

For all intended purposes keep drawing what you wish but at the same time put some time on fundamentals and study them; and then apply the to Miku.

This drawing makes me wish I wish I were innocent again.

>> No.1611061
File: 421 KB, 960x1280, 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611061

>>1611053
cmon anon try to put some effort

>> No.1611100
File: 467 KB, 612x637, 1387220763337.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611100

Any tips on my coloring? Also I know my lines are fucked, gonna clean them up soon. I'm just switching to Photoshop because Sai can't into print so I'm experimenting like hell with this piece.

>> No.1611103

>>1611100

>Any tips on my coloring.

I wouldn't be so concerned about the coloring right now. Everything about your drawing is a flat symbol; think in three dimensional forms. Please read the Sticky.

>> No.1611106

this is weird. I'm used to seeing the animu and mango threads a bit more active than this one is.

>> No.1611113

I've never researched this but I'm wondering what kind of processing you have to apply to a basic drawing to make it look like an authentic screenshot from an anime that runs on TV. You know they have that distinctive look that's very much unlike static images, and it's not just the lower resolution or compression artifacts.

>> No.1611118
File: 412 KB, 560x572, 1387222756019.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611118

>>1611103
Understandable. And I've already read through the sticky, though I'm honestly really unsure about how to avoid symbol drawing.

I'm attempting to think in three dimensional forms but with Animu it's not really the easiest thing to do. Are there any tips that specify to that?

Also, I apparently did more than what I posted, so here's an update. Mainly on hair.

I can't help but feel that the black lines seriously subtract from it at the moment, though.

>>1611113
Also curious about this.

>> No.1611122

>>1611118
>I'm attempting to think in three dimensional forms but with Animu it's not really the easiest thing to do.

No excuses.

http://kitsune-elly.deviantart.com/art/12-7-13-418482873

>Are there any tips that specify to that?

Loomis, more specifically Fun with a Pencil.

>> No.1611136

>>1611122
Anything to do before Loomis?

>> No.1611137

>>1611113
All I see in the stills I have are compression artifacts, soft lines, noise, distortion, and loose anatomies with enough polish to be passable.
>>1611118
If you want to do anime, symbol drawing is what you want. In fact, you're at a beginners level where mastering proportion and perspective are most important and symbolic drawing is acceptable for mastering those subjects.

>> No.1611139

>>1610726
>signing a doodle

>> No.1611143

>>1611136
There's a definite connection between linear perspective and the exercises Loomis has you go through in Fun with a Pencil. I suggest getting Perspective made Easy.

>> No.1611144

>>1611118
>unsure about how to avoid symbol drawing
work through the edwards book or the dodson book.

>> No.1611146

>>1610325
>kawaii uguuu OP
stahp

>> No.1611156

>>1611122
I'm not really making excuses. But I'll reread those books I guess.

>>1611137
Now I'm getting mixed messages.

>>1611144
Well, I mean with anime.

I've already gotten it down with realism. Granted I'm not able to completely recreate a scene from a photograph yet, I know to focus more on what I see and less on what I think is there.

Basically how I word it to myself is 'nothing is perfect, nothing looks like the symbol I see as an eye, or person, or face. There's flaws there, nothing looks the same because of those flaws. And that's good.'

I probably sounded so fucking gay.

>> No.1611158

>>1611156
>reread those books

Please don't tell me you've just been reading them and not participating in their exercises.

>> No.1611159

>>1611158
I've been participating in the exercises, yeah. Guess I should have reworded that.

>> No.1611164

>>1611159
Let's see them.

>> No.1611173
File: 69 KB, 722x472, 1387227432293.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611173

>>1611164
Sorry about the wait. I don't save exercises, and I got a phonecall.

>> No.1611180
File: 2.18 MB, 2108x2488, Anime Faces.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611180

>>1611156
>>1611173
When I say anime is symbol drawing I mean it uses lines and cell shading to show form instead of realistic tones.
If you want to learn to draw anime, you should probably look for books on how to draw anime instead of reading a book on drawing realism and trying to apply that to symbolic art. Some styles of anime contain very unrealistic symbolic representations and guide books will help you pick those up faster.
Even if you start with someone like Loomis, you'll be able to improve your drawing skills enough to learn the anime style by observation.

>> No.1611181

>>1610785
Just going to casually bump this. You don't even have to necessarily help me, but can I at least maybe get an opinion on what looks weird or something of the sort please?

>> No.1611184
File: 163 KB, 480x272, Event_176.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611184

>>1611180
Well, one book I treat like a godsend is Mastering Manga, if that counts for jack shit. I don't really like reading books, though, as silly as it sounds. I do a lot more from simple observation of other shows, manga, etc. Recently I've been trying to teardown Persona 3/4's art, along with Dangan Ronpa's custcene art. Mainly for the coloring/shading/w/e on that because FUCK it looks good.

Pic related.

>> No.1611187

>>1611181
Only thing that might need some tweaking is the arm and maybe the legs should be made a bit smaller, since the thighs may want to be a little thinner.

Other than that, great.

>> No.1611190

>>1611187
Thank you so much for the feedback! I'll try and do so, but could you possibly elaborate on how the arm should be tweaked?

>> No.1611192

>>1611190
Well, right now it looks like it's laying on the ground. Though that could be what you're intending, maybe raise the elbow a bit.

>> No.1611193

>>1611181
well, it's not there yet. at all.
do more gestures drawings. contour drawings, and study all the sizes/lengths of the human body and their proportions.

get a sketchbook or something akin to it, and draw.

>> No.1611205

>>1611192
Yeah, that was actually what I was intending.

>>1611193
Thank you very much for the advice! I'm definitely going to study some more.

>> No.1611222
File: 1.29 MB, 2313x1736, 04-2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611222

>>1610473
>>1610477
Here i am again, today with a totally screwed up picture...
dont know what happened but it just looks awful...
anyways, i hope you guys can give me some feedback about the anatomy, the head and the hair-sources...
and dont even look at the hand, i put it there in about 12 sec so not worth looking at

>> No.1611234

>>1611222
I suggest that you read the sticky and study anatomy first anon

>> No.1611236
File: 50 KB, 960x1280, 2013-12-16 22.24.34.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611236

>>1611053
>>1611061
went away for a bit, came back looked at your redline, looked at some referance. any better?

>> No.1611239

>>1611236
just realised her left forearm is a bit shitty oops.

>> No.1611241

>>1611222
Well one thing, and probably the most obvious problem, is that the arm is completely straight. there is no wrist or elbow. No visible sign of a joint or anything!

And another thing that I've seen consistently in all of the drawings you've posted on this thread, is the hair. The strands are very uneven and it's sticking out very awkwardly.

The entire drawing looks very stiff and emotionless. I can't really give you any in-depth advice but practice gesture drawings! They will help to give more life and flow to your drawings.

>> No.1611244

>>1611241
>>1611222
get the fuck out and read the sticky goddamn it.

>> No.1611249
File: 89 KB, 620x900, 30.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611249

>>1611222
Observe a figure and you will see that there is an intelligent design behind it - for example the size of the hand is in relation to the face. The size of the head is in relation to the size of the body and with that you can divide the figure based on head counts.

Figure drawing for all its worth will help you understand these proportions of the figure but what it doesn't focus on is gesture which is just as important because gesture is the beginning of your drawing as it establishes how you see the figure and gives you an idea of what it is doing.

Without gesture you will end up with a very stiff lifeless drawing, you want to tell a story not with words but with lines and forms that describe what is moving away or towards you.

>> No.1611259

>>1611241
>>1611249
Thank you guys, i will try do do better...
>>1611244
i dont know what i might have said to offend you but im sorry...
at least there are some nice and normal guys as well,
not just these "get the fuck out" people like you

>> No.1611261 [DELETED] 

>>1611259
>i dont know what i might have said to offend you but im sorry...
>at least there are some nice and normal guys as well,
>not just these "get the fuck out" people like you

That right there was called a D/ic/k, you'll learn to love them :3 Don't take it to heart.

>> No.1611262
File: 156 KB, 518x634, dick.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611262

>>1611259
>i dont know what i might have said to offend you but im sorry...
>at least there are some nice and normal guys as well,
>not just these "get the fuck out" people like you

That right there was called a D/ic/k, you'll learn to love them :3 Don't take it to heart.

>> No.1611263
File: 50 KB, 960x1280, 2013-12-16 23.10.16.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611263

>>1611236
i hope you dont mind me taking a bump here

>> No.1611268

>>1611259
>>i dont know what i might have said to offend you but im sorry...
your art is offending me.

it should be a bannable offense for people like you to post more than one image.

>>1611263
same applies to you

>> No.1611270

>>1611268
Hey now, they're doing no harm posting their art. They just want help to improve. If you have such a problem with their art them give them advice to help them get better, and then you might not feel so offended by it.

>> No.1611271

>>1611270
If you want to post here, develop a thick skin now otherwise /ic/ will consume you.

>> No.1611273

>>1611268
out of interest what are you actually doing here ?

>> No.1611279

>>1611273
>>1611270
the thing is, they are not going to improve if they keep dillydallying at this level.
the anons replying to them are not helping either, it's just pointless to have a conversation at this level. there is nothing to be really said other than "practice more".

so the way i look at it, they just post beginner art, and there is absolutely nothing we can do for their improvement. and if they are not going to improve, and they post several images... they are literally shitting up the thread, aren't they?.
at this level, what you do is draw, draw, draw, draw and motherfucking DRAW!
what is the point of not just posting one, but several of their crappy drawings?
this is why you should tell them straight up right away: it's terrible.

>>1611273
i sometimes leave /ic/ open while practicing. and believe it or not, i'm trying to help.

>> No.1611281

>>1611279
I doubt discouraging people by telling them their art is shit is gonna help...

Besides, they can hardly improve if no one points out and tells them what they are doing wrong. They'll just repeat the same mistakes over and over again.

If you get pissed off by that, well, just stop reading this thread. I'm sure there are some other threads on /ic more suited for "your level".

>> No.1611284

>>1610784
I really like it! There is quite a bit you could do to improve it though. The thing is that you have most of the body in one perspective but the hair is in another? Because of this the hair and the- I'll call it chesnut for lack of detail- chestnut in the lower left hand corner both need to be be moved upward, and the hair flattened somewhat, which will basically put them on the same plane of perspective as everything else in the drawing. I would suggest to make the chestnut a tad larger too. All in all it's a good sketch though!

>> No.1611292

>>1611279
You are literally the most pretentious shitfuck I've ever seen in one of these threads and I am here to tell you to get the fuck out.

If they were saying 'well it's my style' or 'it's just a hobby i don't wanna improve' I'd say the same, but they're posting asking for help with things that are obvious flaws.

You're just saying "Get out, you're a beginner, don't even ask for help."

Fuck yourself. I don't think you've even posted a single thing in this thread other than insults. If anyone's shitposting here, it's you.

>> No.1611304

>>1611292
Not that Anon, but think of it this way. Said Anon is testing the two posters up there as you really have to want to improve regardless of what anyone says or whatever happens. It is a struggle against yourself and procrastination, in order to improve you got to have the will and the spirit to keep going; take the OP's message I wrote up there into consideration.

Look at this from another perspective, and see how much of a positive influence it will cause in the long term - not the short term. On the contrary, if anyone here tells you to "fuck off" or "you're a little piece of shit stop drawing you'll never improve" you should feel compelled to prove the antagonist wrong and show you're worth.

If anyone fails to be stubborn about it and gives up just because some random Anon told them to than they had a weak spirit to keep going in the first place and should ask themselves how badly they want to draw and improve. You have to strive for it.

Now let us stop this discussion as it won't go anywhere but it all depends how bad the two posters want to improve.

>> No.1611309

>>1611304
While you have a point, I don't think it'll stop them from drawing, but moreso discourage them from posting in the thread asking for improvement.

Just simply saying 'read the sticky' isn't going to give them the help they want. They came in asking for help because they want one on one, like a private tutor or something. While I personally don't have the skills to give this, some people in this thread can accurately redline and point out where they need to improve. Some people don't learn by practicing tutorials, some people learn by others redlining and them changing their drawing based off the redline or critique, learning the skills and understanding the mistake they made.

I say this because I'm like that.

>> No.1611311

>>1611292
>but they're posting asking for help with things that are obvious flaws.
but the whole thing is a flaw.
and again, at the very least i'm saying that they shouldn't posting several versions of the same drawing. other than that i don't really care.

actually what bothers me the most are the replies to it. i would consider that fake feedback. they are barely behind the starting line, and you should make them understand that. not give them a idea of "everything is fine".

> I don't think you've even posted a single thing in this thread other than insults.
you're wrong

>> No.1611316

>>1611311
Your logic is flawed. This thread is to help them improve, so they change the picture based off the improvements they need to do, repost, we help them again, etc. etc.

Also, prove it then. Only two images in this thread match your typing style, one is pretty good and the other is meh at best. Stop walking around like you're some god amazing artist. We're all here to improve.

>> No.1611321

>>1611281
>Besides, they can hardly improve if no one points out and tells them what they are doing wrong. They'll just repeat the same mistakes over and over again.

Yeah, but if you really don't know what you're talking about when pointing stuff out, you'll never know if you're sending them down the wrong path to begin with. You'll just keep repeating the same wheel spinning advice over and over. No one here has any real world experience in critiquing, and if there were then reference material on how to do that would have been shared already. So, here you are in a similiar situation as the anon you're critiquing. Not being aware of your own problems. Is there an equivalent of the meme "learn the fundamentals" but directed to the craft of critique? Because perhaps some of you need to hear it.

>> No.1611324

>>1611053
haha i see you took some pointers from my previous "redline"

anyway, just keep drawing mate

>> No.1611325

>>1611316
Nah anon, these threads are for confirmation. Have been, and always will be the dysfunctional hugbox you deserve.

>> No.1611326

>>1611321
Then what's the point of this thread, if not to attempt to help others improve? Just post our art and say "LOOK AT WHAT I MADE GUYS!"?

People learn from people. That's why people post in this thread asking for help. Some of the anons here may know how to do a real world critique, too. And they're probably the most help. If they're willing to post and actually help, that is.

How about instead of just yelling "YOU'RE SHIT GET OUT AND READ THE STICKY" we sit down and actually try to help eachother with the flaws in our work?

>>1611325
Oh, really?

Guess I should be taking my leave, then.

>> No.1611330

>>1611326
>Then what's the point of this thread, if not to attempt to help others improve? Just post our art and say "LOOK AT WHAT I MADE GUYS
Who's to say these threads aren't that already? What you call "helping others" some might call "hurting others".

And besides, you misread that entire post. Its about both sides being blind in the learning process. Question here is what are you going to do about it? One side has got a Loomis to learn from, what does your side have ( knowing how to help others)?

>> No.1611332

>>1611330
My side?

My side has skills established from classes. Or maybe they learned from Loomis, or somewhere else. Basically they learned and they're essentially regurgitating information and such. But it's a more one on one process, which some people find better for learning, and some find it easier to study a book.

>> No.1611339

>>1611332
Not the art side, the teaching side, the craft of helping others.

And besides, other took art classes as well, some less than you and some more than you. Some probaly went to a better school than you, others not so. Some may already be professional, others amatuers or just hoppyists. So your credtinals on the art side aren't the issue here. The issue here is, where are the "fundamentals" on how to critique? That's your side.

>> No.1611343
File: 1009 KB, 500x197, OH NOOOO.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611343

>>1611284
I'm glad you like it! I'm afraid I don't really know how I would change the hair like you suggest...

By the way, that 'chestnut' is a very minimally detailed ring, ahaha. I-it's very significant...

>> No.1611348

>>1611339
Fundamentals on how to critique? I guess there aren't any. But critique is, at it's core, just brainstorming about how to fix the issues and make the piece a stronger piece overall.

But I still could be missing the point, and if I am, sorry. I'm at work, and have been since 5:30. My mental patience in general is getting worn thing at the moment.

>> No.1611351

>>1611348
>I guess there aren't any.
Now you're starting to sound like the anons that never "improve". If one side has a goal to get to, and a material to help (loomis for example). What's to prevent the other side from having its material to help.

>> No.1611354
File: 1.82 MB, 378x284, 1386994715487.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611354

These threads are just an enablist newfag hugbox anymore

The people that did have potential bailed long ago and are working fine on their own.

This whomps.

>> No.1611357

>>1610337
the lags look slightly wrong, like the way her upper body is positioned and the placement of her legs slightly at odds with each other

>> No.1611362

>>1611354
I come back occasionally to make me feel better about myself.

>> No.1611375
File: 257 KB, 1208x1096, ScanImage001.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611375

>>1610473
>>1610477
>>1610850
Learn to draw the head first. Her left eye should be smaller. You shouldn't be able to see her right ear. It should go behind her hair.

>> No.1611394

>>1611362
then you're doing it wrong

>> No.1611396

>>1611394
Why are you here, then?

>> No.1611397

>>1611396
to post stuff, get crits and feedback.

>> No.1611400
File: 638 KB, 2100x1500, blackclothesmango_image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611400

>>1610325
How do I into hentai commissions/doujin/h-comic/etc?

I drew this little thing and see if I can include it somewhere.

Should I create an account separate from my personal Tumblr to upload the hentai art? How do I manage both accounts without people realizing is the same guy?

Many thanks in advance

inb4 not korean not female

>> No.1611399

>>1611354
>These threads are just an enablist newfag hugbox anymore
>anymore

Second language?

>> No.1611402

>>1611400
hentaifoundry, seperate tumblr is also good.

>How do I manage both accounts without people realizing is the same guy?

just don't reblog, like, link or do anything to each other but then again if your art is very recognizable by itself, it'll be found out in due time.

>> No.1611406

>>1611397
>get crits and feedback.
>implying they aren't shit.

Most of the posters here wont benefit much from a critique anyway. They're lacking in observational skills, which isn't something to be fixed by telling them what looks wrong in their work. I've posted critique myself, and I can't even see how I would've used it myself.

>> No.1611405

>>1611402
Thank's guy. Yeah I guess I should change my style, it's too obvious right now.

>> No.1611439
File: 62 KB, 279x423, 1387060887264.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611439

>>1611354
>whomps
that sounded cute

>> No.1611453
File: 135 KB, 314x387, 45.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611453

>>1611439
>>1611354

>> No.1611597

>>1611406
>I've posted critique myself, and I can't even see how I would've used it myself.
don't post critique ever again.

>> No.1611599
File: 127 KB, 600x444, 1387267719905.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611599

>>1610785
OP here. Not of this thread, this post I mean. I'm going to be completely honest here...

I think I improved this tenfold. I was already proud of the first one the I posted when I drew it but now it looks like crap. I am really proud of how much I've improved this! Holy holy crap, I'm quite content with myself and my quick progress at the moment. Now I'm going to go get some sleep.

>> No.1611614

>>1611597
Nice argument there, faggot.

>> No.1611627
File: 309 KB, 1000x1175, Untitled-1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611627

Figured this might be the best place to ask. I've been playing off and on with cartoon sketches of people for the past few months, and want to learn how to do caricature. Can any d/ic/ks make some book recommendations?

>> No.1611637

>>1611627
http://www.amazon.com/The-One-Minute-Caricature-Keyl/dp/B0046LUAA4

there's a copy floating around somewhere, got it years ago but just skim through it and deleted it. I don't know the site as well anymore.

>> No.1611652
File: 162 KB, 378x513, wip.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611652

putting a stopping point to this tonight

>> No.1611654

>>1611652
Looks like Yuugen.

>> No.1611661

>>1611654
haha naw its miusel from outbreak company

>> No.1611738
File: 86 KB, 400x300, 1381273655868.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611738

>>1611439
putin I can never get enough pictures of you

>> No.1611838
File: 444 KB, 400x400, helloladies.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1611838

mind socumt

>> No.1611845

>>1610325
Im hoping one of you guys in this thread could help an anon out, got this course work to do that is to be stylized and I'm not meaning anime, more a western Pixar type stylization. However, I've been studying loomis, Vilppu and the like for a few years now and I can't get back into stylized drawing without over thinking it. Any steps I should take to become more western stylized without discrediting my 'classical' studies? FYI it's a building I have to draw.

>> No.1611885

>>1611845
>without discrediting my 'classical' studies?
that's your problem.

just disregard them.
the knowledge that you got from them is important, but you'll use a different process and technique for drawing cartoons.

basically forget all the rules and experiment.

>> No.1611896

>>1611885
...forget....all the rules? you're a rouge bullet saying that sorta thing on /ic/ haha!

>> No.1612020

>>1611637
Looks promising, thanks bro.

>> No.1612079
File: 249 KB, 320x240, 1387322480531.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612079

>>1611599
anon i... i liked the first version better ;_;

i'm sorry ;_;

>> No.1612089

>>1611838

Both arms are broken. Also pointing one is coming out of the torso too low.

>> No.1612100

>>1611896
welcome to this fucking thread.

But its true, try to emphasize/exaggerate movement and gesture

>> No.1612133
File: 381 KB, 638x359, QM6mNb0.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612133

>>1612079
Don't worry about it, we can all have different opinions!

I personally like the second a lot better because in the first I used no guidelines or skeletons or anything and she looks squished and doesn't look weak or dead or anything like I was planning for her to look like, ahaha. In the second one I tried to add more depth and make her look less stiff and I feel like I did so.

But ultimately it goes back to my first point, so you can like the first one better, because it just makes me happy to know that somebody likes something I drew! S-sorry for this long meaningless post.

>> No.1612151
File: 45 KB, 418x428, pirated00d4chansmall.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612151

Pirate doodle I did tonight....meh

>> No.1612157
File: 204 KB, 600x444, rioooooooo.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612157

>>1612133
I kind of gave up on this so I just slapped some colour onto it, bye

>> No.1612181

>>1612133
>Don't worry about it, we can all have different opinions!
oh just shut up. i thought trolls were bad, but you people are worse!

>> No.1612187

>>1612181
!

>> No.1612190

jesus christ this thread is terrible

>> No.1612191

>>1612190
your face is terrible

>> No.1612197

>>1612187
!?

>> No.1612200

>>1612190
See
>>1610336

>> No.1612237

>>1612181
I'm sorry, but I don't understand what you've got your panties in a knot about. I was just letting anon know that it's fine if they like the first version of my sketch better. I probably could have put it in a less ooh-Tumblr way. No, I should have.

>> No.1612240
File: 217 KB, 1488x2105, FACE5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612240

Critique please

>> No.1612244

>>1612190
you mean like every other thread on /ic/?

>>1612240
learn to see your mistakes yourself

>> No.1612248

>>1612244
>you mean like every other thread on /ic/?
i know there's too much critiquing going on in this board when people should learn to spot it themselves. just learn from tom.

>> No.1612252

>>1612244
If he could see his own mistake then he wouldn't need to come here, would he?

Stay classy, /ic/.

>> No.1612254

>>1612240
>>1612244
>>1612248

Jesus Christ, fucking faggots can't answer a simple question without going all condescending aspie on people.

I'll give your artwork a critique. You do lots of things right. The proportions are fine. Everything is in more or less the right place which is better than 90% of what gets posted in draw threads. So that's a good start.

Things I don't like: No line work. Makes it feel vague and backgroundy. She doesn't seem to have a left ear. The skin colors are fine but the top is pretty blah. Also, you've done this so it looks like a painting but it feels kind of unfinished. Go either super flat with your colors or go all the way into painterly mode. Being in the middle feels a little meh.

If you painted the rest of her body with a penis on it, /d/ would probably worship you and proclaim you their holy warrior or something.

>> No.1612258

>>1612254
What do you expect? You are on a board with a bunch of angry failed artists.

>> No.1612264

>>1612258
>Shots fired.

>> No.1612268
File: 1.44 MB, 2223x2560, 029.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612268

>>1612240
Ar................
are you studying from this picture??

/ic/, Will this be over-reference ??It seems you copy the value

>> No.1612278
File: 194 KB, 800x537, CM_show_preview.php.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612278

>>1612264

>> No.1612314

>>1612268
There are similarities, but it's not a direct copy, and I don't see any reason to persecute him.

It's good to imitate artists you like, though it's faster to start of with learning light/shadow studies before complicating things with color.

>> No.1612324
File: 206 KB, 308x579, yipes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612324

>>1612254

>I'll give your artwork a critique. You do lots of things right. The proportions are fine. Everything is in more or less the right place which is better than 90% of what gets posted in draw threads. So that's a good start.

But that's wrong. The spacial relationship between the eyes and other feature placements are fucked because there's no construction going on underneath.

Even if he's "more or less in the right place" it's still going to look off because there isn't much margin for error when conveying form with lines and negative space.

New kids can't seem to wrap their heads around this and it's why they fail starting out because they are trying to eyeball and duplicate the already stylized pictures they see. Instead of, you know, learning linear perspective and how to visualize 3d forms in their heads and fucking draw them. And GOD FORBID, OH THE DOLDRUMS of checking out stuff like Loomis and Vilppu.

The only thing he did was give it a mediocre rendering pass.

But hey, keep filling his head with bullshit and empty praise, that's exactly what he needs.

Fuck.

>> No.1612327

>>1612324
you're in the wrong fucking thread anon

>> No.1612330

>>1612324
thats what this thread needs. Actual critique. It's in the fucking title of this board. Yet most of the faggots here just go "oh find it yourself" or just complete shitposting. This board is no better than the popular interest boards. Only good thing here is the sticky.

>> No.1612341

Sigh, I wish Mikufag were here. I'm sure he'd lighten up the mood.

>> No.1612410

>>1612330
dude, /ic/ is about improving your art. not necessary about critique, no matter what the subtitle of the board is.

>he asked for critique!
>i'm going to do everything in my power to cook up a long post
>even though i don't know how to improve the piece, or what the real problem of the piece is, i'm going to adress as much as i can XD (even though i don't understand anything XD)
don't FORCE critique, it's not that freakin important.

people like you need to fucking get out of here. it's people like you that will finally make these threads into muh weeb animu communiteh 2.0 XD <3
>"let's comment on each others works ;D"
>"don't forget to comment back! ;P"
>"constructive criticism X3"

>>1612240
the drawing is very wonky and weak.
the coloring is a decent start, but that doesn't help if the drawing is bad.
it looks bad because the drawing is bad. practice more drawing.

>> No.1612425

>>1612410
>/ic/ is about improving your art
Why do people keep preaching this? It's not a prerequisite to post, it's not in the rules, and the majority posting don't give an indication. /ic/ ain't your classroom. If others want to post their shit and giggle around it, that 's their prerogative. Same with "serious" fwapping retards that think this is all about "serious" learning.

>> No.1612426
File: 2.83 MB, 480x272, 1384901162953.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612426

>>1612410
Wow, just fucking wow.
>your drawing is bad
>practice more drawing
My God, I think that is the most insightful critique and advice I have ever seen. Even more so after reading your rant about critique. Like, I am sure his mind was blown when you told him that he should draw more to get better at drawing.

You know what is the most hilarious part about a hypocrite? They don't understand that they are being hypocritical. You fucking suck and you should just not post ever again. You have no clue what you are even talking about, do you? I know you don't because you didn't address anything that was wrong with the image.
>wonky and weak
God damn man! That was exactly what is wrong with his image! You are just a master of critique, what would that anon do without those few well chosen words!

>people like you need to get out of here
No, uneducated self important twits like you are the real problem here. You come into these threads and bitch about it, fuck off. No one gives two shits about your opinion on what these threads are and where they are going. This is one of the few times in my life where I wish I had a higher English vocabulary so I could express how outrageously moronic you are.

Post like this >>1612324 are exactly what these threads need, that anon actually knew what he was talking about. He pointed out a key flaw in the image, unlike you. Your advice was literally "you don't draw good, draw better". Why did you even post? You went on a rant about something completely different than what he was talking about. Anime community? Did he say anything about anime? You seriously responded to someone pointing out that actual critique is a good thing, while in the same post giving the worst critique I have ever seen.
I legitimately hope you die before you ever get a chance to post again.

>> No.1612428

Calm the fuck down you aspies

>> No.1612434

>>1612425
it's been board culture since forever.
and thanks for admitting you are actively trying to destroy /ic/.
fuck off to /i/

>>1612426
do you realize that EVERY SINGLE point you are making revolves around the notion that people should write as much as possible to "help" each other?
give the noobs as much attention as possible, and it would be best if we wrote a long essay about what is wrong with their work, when it could be described in just a few sentences?

i'll give you one thing tough. i could have explained a bit more. i didn't because the post was already getting long.
and it's usually the same shit anyway, he's not drawing any forms, forget about form, the eyes aren't even aligned! and they're symbols! and i could go on and on, but i don't, because IT'S POINTLESS.
instead i choose to point out the weakness and tell him what he should do from now on. that's advice. his weakness is drawing, and he needs to practice that.

honest question, think about it:
you think pointing out these flaws will make him a better artist? when do you think he would become a better artist? when he follows my advice or your "critique"?

>> No.1612441
File: 112 KB, 961x615, 1386702908274.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612441

>>1612434
My God, my fucking God. I am so glad that my life will eventually end and I will never have to deal with people stupid as you again.
You are completely oblivious and simple minded.
I don't even know what to say now.

>I was pointing out his weakness
Are you being serious? I honestly cannot tell if you are being serious. I am sure your vague advice is going to work wonders.
>you don't draw good, draw more

I am finding it comical that you don't realize you're an idiot

>> No.1612444

>>1612441
you do realize i won't give this kind of advice to everyone right?
if an elementary school kid comes up to you and asks you for advice, what do you tell them?
>"yeah, that right ear is off and you should do x and y"
yeah right, that's surely what i'm supposed to tell them...

you have to look at the bigger picture, otherwise you won't ever improve.
believe me, i'm just fucking trying to help.

with your method, this is what's going to happen:
-nobody is ever going to improve
-people will post more pictures and they will all look essentially the same.
-people will keep doing it and stroke each other with "critique" and attention.
-their level is never going to change. ever.

YOU DONT NEED CRITIQUE FOR FUNDAMENTAL MISTAKES.
FUCK

>> No.1612445

>>1612444
>projecting

>> No.1612449

>>1612444
>you don't need to critique for fundamental mistakes
That is exactly when someone requires correction because they don't understand that they are making mistakes, hence why they made the mistake in the first place. I'm done speaking with you, never attempt to teach. Don't post half ass vague replies to people's images, it serves no purpose.

>> No.1612451

>>1612449
just leave him anon, he just wants to feel superior while not knowing the fuck he's talking about

>> No.1612453

>>1612449
>requires correction
you're just not getting it. i don't even know why bother to help you faggots.
you have to get a bigger perspective on things. if you lack fundamentals and basically PRACTICE, these critiques won't help anyone.

i asked you before and i'll ask you again:
just how much do you think these corrections will impact him in the long run?
the only thing you're doing is misleading him into thinking
>once i get these problems solved, it'll look good.
AND THAT'S JUST NOT THE TRUTH.
youre literally making them into wheel spinning retards, like that troll always says.

>> No.1612457

>>1612453


>>>/y/
>>>/o/
>>>/u/
>>>/r/
>>>/e/

>>>/f/
>>>/u/
>>>/c/
>>>/k/
>>>/i/
>>>/n/
>>>/g/

>>>/s/
>>>/t/
>>>/u/
>>>/p/
>>>/i/
>>>/d/

>> No.1612461

>>1612457
welp, i'm out.
good luck

>> No.1612462

>>1612100
That'd be cool, but like I said I'm designing a house. So movement and gesture exaggeration won't help in this instance.

And yes, this is the first time I've came to this specific thread....

>> No.1612471

>>1612462

It depends on what you are looking for; if you are drawing a fairytale-like or fantasy building, you should definitly try bending the lines, even for architectural stuff to make it more alive.

>> No.1612476

>>1612471
A stylized real world home.... It's ultimately for a 3D modeling class. But obviously I have to draw it before I can model it..

>> No.1612478
File: 60 KB, 454x340, 666.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612478

i want to improve

>> No.1612492

>>1612478
You're styling too much. It looks like you learned those eyes from other drawings, but forgot to understand them.

>> No.1612493
File: 165 KB, 1576x1300, wobwobwob.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612493

I'm out of my element here doodskies I figure you guys can help me out

I'm doing a commission for a furry (that Christmas money makes me do evil things)

So right now it feels too intense

Also im trying to push the eyes way the fuck out as the main focal point I guess I can call them sex eyes?

I guess I can maybe make her lip biting with the cat tooth visible or partially winking though I feel that might end up looking derpy

Sorry Im walking in the dark here
if anyone knows some artists that paint furries that would be great

like paint paint
googles just giving me some run of the mill nonsense

>> No.1612497

>>1612478

You drew a straight guideline in the middle of the ball, implying the viewer's eye level is here. But you drew the eyes and eyebrows in perspective as if we were looking up at the face. it can't work.

>> No.1612504
File: 11 KB, 259x194, images.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612504

>>1612410
>Criticizing a crititque.
>Giving shit critique himself.

>> No.1612510

>>1612434
>it's been board culture since forever.
You are not the board
You are not a spokesperson for the board
You are not an ambassador for the board
You aren't even its historian.

Thisisntyourclubhouse.jpg

>> No.1612559

>>1612493
>I'm doing a commission for a furry
Is he that guy with the striped furry OC, I see her everywhere

>> No.1612561

>>1612559
>that guy with the striped furry OC
You just described about 30% of the furry fandom.

>> No.1612567

>>1612561
Maybe that's why I see it everywhere.

>> No.1612608

>>1612240
>>1612268
Uh... except for a few similarities these aren't that similar! Definitively not over-referencing (if he/she even used that as a ref, could very easily be something else)

>> No.1612618

>>1612493

Muddy as shit color and small value range.

Get a more interesting light source and get some complimentary colors going in your mixing. It doesn't have to be Ruan Jia-tier opalescence, just made the colors less dead looking.

>> No.1612629

>>1612618
>small value range
Don't you know that small value range is the sign of a seasoned professional? That's called aerial perspective nooblet

>> No.1612674
File: 1.96 MB, 400x225, wPg8h9Q.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612674

>>1612629

oh fuck 10/10 mad as fuck troaled hard

>> No.1612681
File: 37 KB, 444x720, taiga.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612681

Triying some Taigas.

>> No.1612685

>>1612478
Adjust your guidelines so that you live by them once you create them. Otherwise you will practice them having no meaning.

If you drew the horizontal guideline first, then place the eyes on it evenly. Guidelines are there to create the logic of your image. It's ok to deviate from them as you go, but if you do, then change or erase the guidelines.

I'm speaking so strongly about this because that's all that is present in this image and you didn't ask any questions. If you are scared of an overly negative response from posting more, I can't blame you.

>> No.1612686

>>1612681
cute, but not much more

>> No.1612689

>>1612493
I'm going to mention right off the bat that I find this image offensively furry.

Now that that's out of the way, there are a number of things to mention. First, anatomy-wise, the origin of the ears doesn't seem to make sense. If you consider the position of ears on any mammal with ears on the top of its head, they are rarely that close to the front of the head. If you had wished to include them in the framing the you should change how the image is cropped.

You're working with some really weird ultra-soft studio-ish lighting. While I prefer the direct impression one gets from single-source direct lighting, you're welcome to continue with the diffuse light if you feel you can pull it off. As for painting furries, you could just look up paintings of animals or something. If you're looking for reference on how to draw skin-fur, just find pictures of short-haired animals, I imagine cats & dogs would be easy to find helpful images.

If you want to make the eyes more of a focal point, then use brighter colors in order to utilize contrast. Also experiment with re-framing the image.

>> No.1612701

>>1612681
Nice lines, and good imitation. The body lacks convincing form, and you have to work on hands, which is tough, I know. A good way to practice is to first draw the hand as if it is a single large mass, including the fingers (sort of a block-in method).

She's posed as if she is resting the wooden sword on her shoulder, but it's actually floating, making the pose seem awkward. Anchor the hand and sword in the proper position, and try taking the pose yourself to get the rest of the arm in place.

Also, try drawing the entire body. Once you've created a more coherent explanation for the legs it will look more convincing when you crop it. You should force yourself to draw in such a way that if you end up drawing to the edge of the page, you start over. Always give yourself room.

>> No.1612911
File: 153 KB, 744x963, jestercolorsmall.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612911

Attempt at cell shading.

>> No.1612929 [DELETED] 

>>1612324
Typical condescending aspie asshole. Go fuck yourself with a broom handle and bleed to death from your rectum, fucking faggot. Think you're better than everyone else. Narcissistic motherfucker. I hope you fucking die in a fire.

>> No.1612934

>>1612453
I get the point you're making. I think some people in this thread are not yet ready for critiques or any sort of completed work in that matter. Fundamental mistakes are not usually improved with correction/critiques. You have to see the mistakes and know how to improve them yourself and the only way to do that is keep practicing and observing.

>> No.1612943

>>1612929
But he's completely right. His condescension gets a pass because the original critique was fucking -bad-.

>> No.1612964
File: 39 KB, 480x640, 1375031723018.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1612964

>>1612929

>BAWWW MUH FEELINGS ARE HURT! better prove how wrong you are by calling you a bunch of names!

Perhaps Deviantart is a better place for edgy children like you.

>> No.1612991

>>1612929

I'm sorry that you mistake the truth with condescension.

>> No.1613017
File: 342 KB, 563x509, 1386615763561.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613017

>>1612929
SOME ONE LEGITIMATELY MAD

>> No.1613018
File: 38 KB, 576x251, Sketchbook_54_redux.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613018

>>1610325
Am I kawaii ^///^??

>> No.1613029
File: 105 KB, 745x1211, TitledUn.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613029

Working on some advice from anons
Changed ear location
Attempting to blow out certain portions to 70-90% value range

Making the Fur more Fluff

Cropped Entire thing in (shamefru dispray)

Bumping Shadow range to high saturation
Bumping eye saturation - Needs second color perhaps a blue or gray- mildly saturated

Seems like the hair is sort of layered in a sense portions of fluff on fluff for this Im probably going to couple a soft brush with a wet mixing brush - Perhaps Smudge tool to get color distortion - Possible fix unlikely

For Comp color only thing I can think of is to change the backround to a desaturated blue

Sorry for rambling

>> No.1613061
File: 169 KB, 1240x1754, FACE6.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613061

is this better?
I admit my foundation is not strong, and this is a study on Murata Range.

Thx everyone for helping me

>> No.1613081
File: 79 KB, 825x577, ss (2013-12-18 at 11.25.42).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613081

>>1613061
I don't mean to discourage you, but no matter how close you get to Murata's rendering, it's worthless if you can't keep a consistent impression of anatomy.

This is a quick sketch of your apparent body alignments, and how I would have done a block-in.

I'd like to point out that many master painters started their work by drawing, so I strongly recommend learning the basics of the block-in etc. before you try to learn to render in color. When you block something in, at least you can tell when something makes sense, to the point where you've learned the anatomical rules.

In order to fix this image, you're gonna have to do some erasing, which is convenient for you since you are working digitally.

>> No.1613082
File: 345 KB, 844x1199, b7f3dbeeb29ab12a3b007a4290e.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613082

>>1613061

Worry about your drawing first before trying to make finished colored works.

Murata's a really hard guy to copy because he really knows how to make features shrink and grow in perspective and make it look easy. He also can draw realistic faces very well because he has those foundations.

I'm the anon with the yipes pic earlier, I really wasn't directing my wrath toward you. You have some decent potential with coloring, just get your drawing underneath up to scratch.

>> No.1613083

>>1613029
Well, it seems to be coming along rather well, though it looks like a person that just painted herself and that kinda enters the uncanny valley. You'd have to explore anthropomorphic art, which I wouldn't wish on you, but if the money's good it may be worth it.

As it is, I think it'll come out nicely if you reinforce the form lighting, because some parts of the image still look flat (such as the hair and arms), but I reckon that's because you haven't gotten to those parts yet.

>> No.1613130
File: 51 KB, 1038x686, WARM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613130

My fingers are freeze
So draw simple things

>> No.1613135 [DELETED] 
File: 255 KB, 1356x1316, Inori Christmas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613135

>>1610325
Still learning. CnC please

>> No.1613136 [DELETED] 

>>1610325
Still learning. CnC please.
4chan hates this file size and too lazy to resize
http://imgur.com/D8c26Gi

>> No.1613159
File: 52 KB, 1000x800, demhips--18-12-2013.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613159

I can't into hands. Or much of the female or male anatomy for that matter. Or perspective. Or coloring. Or interesting gestures...more at eleven.

>> No.1613161

>>1613159
that's because you're drawing in 2d mindset, learn to draw basic 3d forms and placing them spatially.

and if you don't know anatomy and all those other stuff then start getting resources to learn from.

>> No.1613209

>>1613018
you are trying too hard

>> No.1613214

>>1613029
i'm sorry, but the colors are poop and your rendering is poop and the pose is uninteresting and the subject matter is poop. learn to scrap your work and start anew.

>> No.1613215

>>1613214
your mom is poop

>> No.1613217

>>1613159
Never too early to start learning anatomy/construction.

>> No.1613228

>>1613130
ur so cute :3

>> No.1613261

>>1613214
Crit emotional damage

If I could change the subject matter to a badass knight fighting ultra megazoid thunder dragons from space, I would. UInfortunately thats not what this commission allows :(

Bust commission from front facing view
watchu want me to change it to 3/4s with a 1600s lighting scenario watchu thinkan boi

Ive got you covered on that last part I drop stuff all day erry day

>> No.1613265

>>1613261
>shitty everything
>excuses
Pick 2

>> No.1613268

>>1613265
damn it anon im making jokes and you're here trying to troll me

Wakaflaka4lyf

>> No.1613273

>>1613261
wow conmana, i didn't even realize this was you. it's not up to your usual standard. guess you're just really good at rendering armor.

Your shadows still look too desaturated imo.

>> No.1613279
File: 149 KB, 903x1308, flood with my shit.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613279

>>1613273
understandable mang
Soft surface rendering im pretty scrub at learning a few things from this which is good

The saturation is pretty crazy in the dark bits maybe I should desaturate into saturation actually thats not a half bad idea

If I did this 10 million times maybe I could do some super speedy furries but uhh..This is more of quick cash out deal. Pretty crazy what these guys pay especially for the gay stuff.

>> No.1613281

>>1613279
Don't sell your soul for gay furry money, dude! It's not worth it!

>> No.1613282

>>1613279
loopsided, try flipping it to see but then again just for money doesn't really worth the trouble.

>> No.1613284

>>1613281
it's that or suck dick on a street corner

man's gotta eat

>> No.1613289

>>1613282

Thanks fixed it

>>1613281
Unfortunately - >>1613284
anon is right I need monz and any decent paying freelance stuff is way out of my league

I can either lowball myself and get screwed orrrr
Get mad dosh from furries...Sucks really I hope I can start supporting myself off my fantasy stuff sometime.

Such if life
Then again perhaps im not searching hard enough or not spending enough time on my knights to buttblast people

>> No.1613292
File: 1.46 MB, 1372x900, 1387473809896.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613292

>>1613279

Look up Vera Mundis, he doesn't paint every furstrand, his stuff is more like solid matte midtone rendering + light and shadow with tufts of fur here and there.

If you want to do more of this in the future, rip from the best nawmsayin?

>> No.1613300

>>1613292
Damn that skin is juicy as fuck, part realistic, part clay, part soft fur, awesome.
Too bad I will never be able to render like that

>> No.1613319
File: 114 KB, 908x908, skook.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1613319

Sketch for different client

>>1613292
I guess once I get to rendering ill simplify tone it down and go for certain areas hinting at the idea of some type of feather I suppose

>> No.1614034
File: 477 KB, 707x800, 545745548.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614034

So what are you guys doing for Christmas?

>> No.1614035

>>1614034
Work. Such is life for a State employee.

>> No.1614041
File: 40 KB, 500x373, 500px-Groove_on_Fight_-_082.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614041

>>1613082
Wait... that's the dude who managed the Power Instinct series' artwork!

Holy shit. I should go play Groove-On-Fight again. That game had sick artwork too.

>> No.1614122
File: 299 KB, 1200x1600, Image122020132000111.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614122

I feel like my animus are mediocre, but I dont know how to push myself to do better.
>inb4 loomis
been there done that

>> No.1614125

>>1614122
Work on your perspective and learn some god damn anatomy.
Also more Vilppu.

>> No.1614126

>>1614125
Exactly what aspects of anatomy are improper?

>> No.1614129

>>1614122
Way below mediocre. It'd be a waste of time to list what's wrong anatomically, she's missing a ribcage for christ's sake.

>> No.1614131

>>1614129
>it would be a waste of time
What are you doing on 4chan then? Just redline it instead of acting like your opinions mean anything at face value.

>> No.1614135

>>1614131

there's no need for a redline. Just learn some anatomy.

>> No.1614141

>>1614135
Well what bloody parts of anatomy then? The shoulders? The arms? Neck? I know she has no ribcage, the idea is that she just has a small waist but I might as well give her a more pronounced ribcage.

>> No.1614146
File: 22 KB, 350x337, 1373961737115.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614146

>>1614122
>>1614141

It hurts to be told to get out and stop being a newfag but it's exactly what you're doing right now.

Come back when you have something that warrants critique.

If this is even a sincere post and not a troll

>lined paper

Really?

>> No.1614147

>>1614146
Well fuck you I had notebooks left over. Guess I came to the wrong board for artwork critique.

>> No.1614152

>>1614147
Not that anon but as much as I oppose his way of critiquing, he does raise a good point. Lined paper is just plain annoying. Not much wrong with it but at least make an effort by using normal blank paper.

That said, Lined paper is a good way to practice some proportions but by then you might as well use grid paper.

Problem with lined/grid paper though is that it can sometimes make drawn lines look uneven or even crooked because of muh optical illusions. Takes some getting used to.

Again, if you're really adamant on practicing and getting gud you probably should use blank paper/canvas. It's just better that way

peace

>> No.1614168
File: 877 KB, 1440x900, blook-lines.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614168

>>1614122
>>1614131

The last thing you want to do is mimic me because we're both absolute beginners however here is my attempt at a "redline" but I could not use your drawing as it is a symbol of what you tried to show with your drawing.

What I'm trying to communicate to you here are Basic Forms in Perspective. Instead of going overly anatomical I only used a simple oval/sphere for the ribcage and tried to direct your eye on where the corners of the ribcage (might) be.

Notice how I am trying to describe form by going "around" it and "across" the forms to show you the direction it is going. I used Loomis's divided ball and plane for the head and yes I started off with a circle but I tried to "build it" using his techniques found in Fun with a Pencil.

Unless other Anons want to invest time and effort drawing from imagination to show what you tried to draw, you're all I am probably going to get. We both need to read the Sticky.

>> No.1614175
File: 126 KB, 566x476, bboy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614175

slightly photoshopped version of a guy I drew for a flyer/poster

>> No.1614177

>>1614168
That really sheds some light on some of my problems. I used a really simple rig. I'll add more bones next time I think, and be back with something that will hopefully warrant critique.

>> No.1614189
File: 1.98 MB, 250x187, 1386999159495.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614189

>>1614177

OH MY GOD DO NOT TAKE ADVICE FROM MIKUFAG

>> No.1614192

>>1614189
Should I take yours instead?

>> No.1614200

>>1614189
Have any better advice?

>> No.1614220

>>1614189
His advice is solid faggot

>> No.1614224
File: 42 KB, 254x246, 1383147938309.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614224

>>1614192
>>1614200

Oh my god I had like a page and a half of a lesson plan made but something happened on the quick reply box disappeared.

FUCK

Maybe tomorrow, newfriends

>> No.1614226

>>1614224
;_;

>> No.1614231

>>1611279
this is EXACTLY why i don't bother posting in this thread ever. im at such a low level, i don't even see the point in posting my art because it just is going to boil down to "practice, loomis, etc".

i just want to get to a level where i have problems that can be addressed instead of looking at my completed work and sobbing that i spent so long on something so shitty.

would you equate people watching your art on an art site or tumblr some kind of meter as to you improving? i feel so, as why would anyone bother with shit art, right?

i really don't know why i even bother lurking here, it's not like im going to learn anything from reading the posts or asking for help i can't get due to skill level. maybe in another year i can post again and i'll have something art related to ask, redlined or bitched at because of poor fundamentals/skill/anatomy.

>> No.1614234

>>1614122
All of it. Especially the arm oh my god. When people say learn some anatomy they mean you need to study /everything/. Non of this even remotely correct, not to sound mean or anything but you really need to work on that.

>> No.1614237

>>1614122
>>1614131

This is kind of hard to redline because there really is so much off that its pretty much a whole new drawing.

>> No.1614238
File: 2.88 MB, 3400x1578, redline4.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614238

>>1614237
forgot pic

>> No.1614240

>>1614231
You're thinking about artistic progress as if it where in set levels.
There's no such thing. There is only knowledge and diligence. If you can't handle those things, you won't improve at all.

Perhaps you shouldn't come here. You're clearly far too enraptured in your own ego to let your flaws be torn away.

>> No.1614243

>>1614122
>>inb4 loomis
>been there done that
...Are you sure?

>> No.1614261

>>1614238
you should leave redlining to people who are better

>> No.1614276

>>1614261
That redline is ten times better than the blue one.

>> No.1614290
File: 573 KB, 1139x709, 1387621273279.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614290

>>1614122
redline cause im bored
you really need way more practice before you can benefit from a redline

>> No.1614294

>>1614290
The breasts and bra is almost in front view while the rest of the
torso is tilted, the center of the breasts is not even lining up with the
center of the collarbone.

>> No.1614295

>>1614294
yeah i dont usually draw breasts : /

>> No.1614297
File: 831 KB, 1386x922, dontdothis.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614297

>>1614122

>> No.1614311
File: 250 KB, 1200x800, 1387591422067.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614311

>>1614122
We Redline Day now?

>> No.1614313

>>1614168
Yo mikufag.

Have you tried using box forms? I think one problem with your drawings is that it's too "round".

>> No.1614341

>>1612911
>burn & dodge

the shadow are VERY light and don't seem to be placed with any thought. Practice shading some simple shapes and learn to apply shapes to a body.

tl;dr More loomis

>> No.1614347

>>1614122
>been there done that
so you just read the book and decided that's it, or what?

that drawing is more or less un-redlinable because everything about it is fucked. redlining that would be more like a redrawing.

>> No.1614349

>>1612911
Heavier shadows, commit to the light source more and put a wider range of shade on the face especially.

Also bleeding on the shoulder to the right, and the top of the cane's hat

>> No.1614353
File: 321 KB, 2000x1413, #shotsFired.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614353

>>1614122
>mediocre
don't flatter yourself, toots

>lined paper
At what point did this seem like a good idea?

breasts are starting too high and are connected as some bizarre uniboob and are far too circular, does she not have nipples? Because I don't see a shirt anywhere. Also the shoulders are far too wide for a young female.

>Inb4 loomis, been there done that
doubt.png

Is this a serious post or are we all being trolled?

>> No.1614378

>>1614122
>been there done that

So you downloaded Loomis, scrolled through the first book in about 5 minutes, and copied a few drawings out of it?

Then I haven't a clue what you could be missing.

>> No.1614382
File: 206 KB, 1200x1600, redlinerwer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614382

>>1614122
my first attempt at animu
Am i gonna make it /a/nons? :3

>> No.1614383

>>1614313
Yep I'm starting to work on that but I don't want to rush myself without fully understanding what I am currently doing first.

>> No.1614385

>>1614382
The torso seems to be facing me while at the same time the head is turned away I tried to twist and turn my torso in the same fashion as your drawing and felt very uncomfortable.

Take the pose, try and see if you can duplicate what you drew yourself.

>> No.1614389

>>1614385
>The torso seems to be facing me while at the same time the head is turned away
what?
like.. are you implying people cant turn their heads? I mean I notice the torso is wacky but what you are saying i really dont understand. Can you redline my redline?

>> No.1614391

>>1614389
Dobson? Is that you? Anyways, it seems too extreme of a turn as if the torso is facing directly flat at me.

>> No.1614393

>>1614389
Observe this redline here, notice how the torso is turned with the head as you can clearly read the direction where it is turning since this Anon has described it for you.

>>1614311

>> No.1614396
File: 86 KB, 600x800, redlinerwer23.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614396

>>1614391
>>1614393
but.. thats the direction I drew the torso in. Idk how u guys see it looking straight at you. Maybe the crop doesnt make it clear enough. I resized it and drew this. Like.. I dont really see what you are trying to say. If you still feel the same after this image, could you please redline so I can fix it.

>> No.1614398

>>1614396
Yeah, next time don't crop out important details that help the viewer see what your drawing is doing.

>> No.1614408
File: 40 KB, 482x708, hhh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614408

I can't foreshorten this arm, can you guys help me?

>> No.1614412
File: 191 KB, 800x800, wat.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614412

first attempt at animu-ing

how do you people even do it

>> No.1614415
File: 159 KB, 482x708, 0033.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614415

>>1614408

>> No.1614418

>>1614415
fail

>> No.1614429

>>1614415
you made it worse

>> No.1614436

>>1614408
keep the size of the fist the same, shorten the arm and reduce the downward angle a bit.. till it looks right.

>> No.1614457 [DELETED] 
File: 459 KB, 800x1000, fgjr5343.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614457

>>1614408

>> No.1614458 [DELETED] 
File: 284 KB, 700x800, ghjtt6762.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614458

>>1614415

>> No.1614459
File: 284 KB, 700x800, ghjtt6762.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614459

>>1614408

>> No.1614461

>>1614459
Not that Anon, but hahah I almost had the same idea of how to approach this foreshortening of the arm; Perspective is finally making sense now. Thank you Teal.

>> No.1614462
File: 162 KB, 482x611, gsdfs.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614462

>>1614459
here, i overlayed it for you.

>> No.1614465

>>1614459
I'm definitely going to study this.

>> No.1614470

>>1614459
That's invaluable, thank you very much indeed. I will be using this to study for sure.
>>1614462
I truly appreciate it. It appears so simple now. I lack that fundamental knowledge for foreshortening it seems because I couldn't even get my head around it and this is so far from what I imagined.

>> No.1614472

>come back to thread
>redlines fucking everywhere
Well I must admit through the profanity and insults I am actually learning quite a lot about what I messed up. Thanks guys. Got a big old piece of blank paper out right now.

>> No.1614475

>>1614462
>>1614470

Don't overlay, and don't try to copy. This is not about making small changes to your drawing. Focus on the logic and the process/procedure of the drawing instead.

>> No.1614476
File: 253 KB, 557x720, tlc_mel_bochner_08.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614476

>>1614475
do you even draw? drawing is all about making changes and fixing.

>> No.1614480

>>1614476
I think he means that you should learn how to reproduce that effect for all drawings in the future instead of just fixing the one temporary problem.

>> No.1614484

>>1614480
i'm not arguing the validity of learning construction, but to say that you shouldn't make "small changes" to your drawing is asinine vomit.

>> No.1614489 [DELETED] 

>>1614484

Making "small changes" means he's not constructing fresh, which means he's not learning how to draw for himself.

There is no point to copying that, or any other correction, because there is no one answer. What if his character were stronger, or skinnier, or his forearm is longer, or the camera was closer to the hand? All of these can change the outcome.

If he learns the logic of the drawing, he can place the hand in any number of positions, as demonstrated in that image, and draw it convincingly.

>> No.1614496

I'll just direct this to the artist who actually wants to learn.

Making "small changes" means you're not constructing fresh, which means you're not learning how to draw for yourself.

There is no point to copying that, or any other correction, because there is no one answer. What if the character were stronger, or skinnier, or the forearm is longer, or the camera was closer to the hand? All of these can change the outcome, and I don't know what you have in mind. Only you know what you want.

Learn the logic of the drawing, and you can place the hand in any number of positions, as demonstrated in that image, and draw it convincingly.

>> No.1614499

>>1614489
no, making small changes" doesn't mean not constructing fresh. for one thing, even construction can be faulty. making changes/fixing means correcting your unavoidable mistakes. NOT to do that is a big, big mistake.

>> No.1614506

>>1614499
that logic works when you actually realize your own mistakes, and how to solve them.

When someone else points out the mistake for you via redline and you overlay it with your own drawing and go from there, you aren't learning anything, you're just copying what someone else told you to do.

if someone redlines the fix for you, it's better to still do it again completely.

>> No.1614509

>>1614506
Sorta like if you teach a man a fish etc

>> No.1614510

>>1614506
are you trying to say that we shouldn't make redlines? if redlines don't teach you anything, we should just ignore people who are asking for them?

>> No.1614515

>>1614510
>are you trying to say that we shouldn't make redlines?

holy reading comprehension, batman!
No that's not what I'm saying. Redlines are great.
I'm talking about the way redlines are used, and this: >>1614462 is most definitely NOT how you use redlines.

Redlines are meant to show how another artist (who is hopefully more experienced than the original artist) would fix a the problem, and hopefully said redline has some explanation as to why he fixed it in the way that he did.
Then the person receiving the redline should look at it, read all the shit, and then go "oh that's how I can fix it", and then proceed to fix it HIMSELF, in his OWN way, NOT by tracing the redline, because everyones redline has a hint of stylistic choice included whether they intend it or not.

After receiving a redline, one should not expect the problem to be solved automatically. Redlines are supposed to guide you to the right direction, but they do not solve the problems themselves

>> No.1614520

>>1614515
well that goes without saying. in the end you are still going to draw it similarly to the redline and in the end it's going to look like a copy without being an actual copy, because if it's too different, it's going to look wrong, unless you decide to move the arm or whatever you are drawing.

>> No.1614532
File: 86 KB, 595x770, smallolicolor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614532

Trying to do cell shading... how is it?

>> No.1614534

>>1614261
Eh I hurt my wrist so I had to do that with my left hand so yeah it's pretty shitty, that anon wanted to know what was wrong with it so I was just pointing it out.

>> No.1614535

>>1614532
light source is unconsistent.

>> No.1614537

inconsistent huh? yeah... new to this color and shading thing... need to watch a tutorial or something.

>> No.1614543

>>1614537
click the number in the post to reply to the post itself so people know who you're talking to

>> No.1614546
File: 292 KB, 1200x1600, Image122120131733471.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614546

So I redid my terrible animu. I don't think it got any better though.

>> No.1614547 [DELETED] 

ok... thnx

>> No.1614549 [DELETED] 

slightly better, maybe use more anatomy reference. uh uh... learn 2 loomis faggot.

>> No.1614555

>>1614546
Dear fucking god.

You say you did Loomis, but I ain't having that shit.
There's no way in fuck you actually read any of his books.

>> No.1614558
File: 913 KB, 500x375, tumblr_magvo8Bf6b1rzbn8ko1_500.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614558

>>1614546

>I don't think it got any better though.

We spent half of the thread explaining to you why that is

>> No.1614562

>>1614546
You remind me of me last year :3

Keep at it, don't stop drawing you'll improve but please put some time and effort in Loomis.

>> No.1614568

>>1614562
>>1614555
>>1614558
Alright, fuck it. I'm gonna quit, take a nice long re-read of EVERYTHING Andrew Loomis has written, and then start from scratch with learning how to draw the outline of a skull. Then I'll come back.

>> No.1614569

>>1614568
by reading you mean doing the exercises, right?

That's what you did the first time around, right?

>> No.1614574

>>1614569
Well yeah. You cant learn drawing from just reading.

>> No.1614575

>>1614574
good. you just need to draw more and put more thought into drawing. you know, construction and all that

>> No.1614579

>>1614575
I try to put a lot of thought into what I'm going to draw. I guess I just dont have the skills to back it up though.

>> No.1614581
File: 463 KB, 670x496, m88.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614581

>>1614568

Protip: Learn perspective before trying to learn anatamoos

Start with these and Scott Roberstons Perspective and Rendering Matte surfaces Gnomon dvds. (on cgpeers or gfxpeers, I forget which one.)

You'll thank me later.

>> No.1614594

>>1614581
not the anon you're replying to, but I found the CA thread on perspective a lot clearer, albeit less technical.
http://www.conceptart.org/forums/showthread.php?p=1485584

>> No.1614630

New Thread:

>>1614626
>>1614626
>>1614626

>> No.1614635
File: 1010 KB, 2000x2000, forms.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614635

>> No.1614641
File: 103 KB, 572x900, 56456.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1614641

>> No.1614730

>>1614641
dude miku, you dont need so many guidelines

>> No.1614776

>>1614730
I'll tone them down a bit and focus on more important details, thanks.

>> No.1617173
File: 114 KB, 600x675, Norippe Quick Chicken Scratch.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1617173

This one's drawing from imagination, how much more Hampton do I need? A redline or just pointing out errors would be great too

Also, what's a good ratio for drawing from imagination and drawing from observation?

>> No.1617193

>>1617173
There's a new thread. This one has autosaged.

>>1614630