[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 872 KB, 1650x1019, sargent_brush_economy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457236 No.1457236 [Reply] [Original]

Gentlefolk of /ic/, let us share artwork and discuss issues pertaining to brush economy in painting, as it relates to work done with actual physical paint.

Pic related - it's a detail of An Artist In His Studio by John Singer Sargent, from 1904.

>> No.1457237
File: 201 KB, 1143x883, sargent-studio-dartista2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457237

Here is the entire painting.

>> No.1457243
File: 190 KB, 606x480, Slonim,_David_red_house__yellow_house.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457243

A more rustic contemporary work that I like a lot.

I don't know the exact size, but I believe it's quite small.

>> No.1457244
File: 141 KB, 663x828, cassatt_summertime.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457244

As someone just getting into oils I really need a thread like this.

/ic/ really does not discuss enough traditional mediums/art.

I'm fairly confident with the way I'm handling it so far even though I'm quite new to it.

Anyone have any recommended reading or info for oils?

>> No.1457248

>>1457244

Oils are just MEDIUM, what the fuck do you need to read about oils?

The problem probably is that you don't know how to draw or you dons understand light and color.

>> No.1457255 [DELETED] 

>>1457248
this. newbs are always place undue emphasis on medium and technique.

>> No.1457259

>>1457248
There's a great deal to handling paint that doesn't have anything to do with drawing. Please try to relax and be more thoughtful and civil.

>> No.1457260
File: 81 KB, 894x733, girl1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457260

>>1457248
> this guys work

>> No.1457266 [DELETED] 

>>1457260
Grow up.

>> No.1457264 [DELETED] 

>>1457244
Well, there's Alla Prima: Everything I Know About Painting, by Richard Schmid.

>> No.1457271

>>1457266
If you're the one who posted this, you might do better to take your own advice:
>>1457248

>> No.1457288
File: 704 KB, 1514x1057, The_Stone_Bridge.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457288

The Stone Bridge, by Rembrandt.

>> No.1457289
File: 976 KB, 2099x1059, The_Stone_Bridge_detail_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457289

>>1457288
Detail 1

>> No.1457290
File: 973 KB, 2101x1058, The_Stone_Bridge_detail_2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457290

>>1457288
>>1457289
Detail 2

>> No.1457295
File: 340 KB, 1600x1067, Leyendecker couple detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457295

Leyendecker's brushwork is insane

>> No.1457302
File: 456 KB, 1800x3200, DSCN0688.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457302

>>1457244
For my own reasons, i had to start painting in oils to color my illustrations, something that i didn´t did since 1994. There are some stuff you need to know:
1- You mix colors directly in the painting. This is a great advantage of the medium when creating shades, but oil paintings have different results depending for how long it has been wet or dry - there´s a semy-dry moment when the paint has a different result.
2 - Applying linen oil to the canvas before painting will result in a different, smoother stroke, and mixing it with cobalt dryer will make the paint dry in a night or two;
3 - You can paint in paper, cheaper than conventional canvas and easier to scan to the computer. Those are 30% cotton paper, special paper for oil painting, and you can get a ream of 20 leafs with 20x30 cm for the price of one traditional canvas, great for practice.
4 - A paint needs a drawing. It´s easy to paint, but hard to draw. A good drawer can easily become a good painter, but a good painter will hardly became a good drawer, so learn how to draw first.

>> No.1457313

>>1457244
Most of /ic/ loves traditional mediums and art, its why everyone here loves Craig Mullins and Jaime Jones. There's just less of it posted because being able to save and upload a copy from Photoshop takes about five seconds. On the other hand, for an oil painting you would need to find a good light and angle that accurately represents what you're seeing outside of the camera. Then you have to plug stuff in, etc. I imagine it's why most people got into digital, it's just simpler in almost all aspects. Less paint to buy and mix, less stuff getting in the way of making art.

Alla Prima is a great book to start with, as well as Gurney's Color and Light. For landscapes there's a ton of books and tutorials, but I'd probably watch Shaddy Safaddi's whether or not you're into digital. He refers back to Alla Prima a lot.

Some good artists to check out are
>Qiang Huang
>Dave Palumbo
>John Singer Sargent
>Anders Zorn
>Craig Mullins and Jaime Jones
>Maciej Kuciara
>Scott Christensen
Both Craig and Jaime draw a lot from Sargent (and a bit of Zorn), who really was a master of economy in the truest sense. If you google "Jaime Jones workshop" you should find some examples of his work where he quotes JSS directly. Craig has a 9 page write-up from Sargent's students on his site (Goodbrush.com, head over to Misc and then Painting information for the .pdf). What it came down to was intense patience and accuracy. He would think about literally every single stroke before he put it down. Even when he worked in stages (Block in then detail) he would make sure the shape is absolutely correct before continuing. Then he would simplify and destroy what he did if necessary. Here's a great site featuring all his work
>http://jssgallery.org/index.htm

>>1457248
Need to calm down and stop saying random crap.

>> No.1457318
File: 845 KB, 1368x1055, Melancholy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457318

Melancholy - Edgar Degas

>> No.1457323
File: 910 KB, 1990x1018, Melancholy_detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457323

>>1457318
detail

>> No.1457324

>>1457313

>He would think about literally every single stroke before he put it down.

This is how every beginner in drawing or painting should do. Huge percentage of people who want to be an artist don't think a shit what they are doing. They spend hours, days, weeks, months for scribbling and hope this will get them to the top.
Every single shit should be done carefully for first few times.

>> No.1457367

>>1457324
Yep, I agree. What I think happens (and I may be wrong, or it's obvious and I'm not nearly as brilliant as my mom tells me) is that there's a subtle change in mindset regarding how paint is put down. When you're doing a study, you should be analytical in every move you make. So one might think:

>This is a bumpy surface, so the highlight there is going to be wavy

This starts to get tedious after some time, and naturally your attention will fade and it becomes

>Squiggly white line here...
>Squiggly blue here.

Until eventually you're not paying attention at all and just mechanically making strokes ("licking"). Newbies will fall into this trap often because they simply don't know better, and experienced painters hit this but might not realize it for some time. This is why I tend to step away from a piece, or even grab an instrument and play a little, every twenty minutes or so. Sargent did this, and it just helped him clear his mind a little so he could go back refreshed.

Apologies if everything I say is long-winded. Few people around here seem to actually want legit help, OP seems the type.

>> No.1457377
File: 568 KB, 764x1000, Final project stage 7.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457377

>>1457367
Here's Qiang, as I mentioned before.

>> No.1457383
File: 490 KB, 878x1060, Mary_Cassatt_by_Degas.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457383

>>1457244
You posted Cassatt. Here's a portrait of Cassatt by Degas.

>> No.1457387

>>1457383
they boned i bet

>> No.1457393 [DELETED] 

>>1457387
how old are you 14?

>> No.1457404
File: 103 KB, 555x800, image001[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457404

>>1457393
28, i just like to think of mary cassatt boning, just look at her that saucy minx

>> No.1457535

seeing this gives me the hardest inspiration boner

like an actual physical boner for art. holy shit

>> No.1457543
File: 176 KB, 1332x1600, Self_Portrait_as_Apostle_Paul.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457543

Rembrant - Self Portrait as the Apostle Paul

>> No.1457544
File: 771 KB, 1649x1017, Self_Portrait_as_Apostle_detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457544

>>1457543
detail

>> No.1457586
File: 1.64 MB, 1178x1332, Frans_Hals_-_Luitspelende_nar.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457586

>> No.1457600

Knowing that most of /ic/ have near to 0 experience it must be noted that as a beginner, trying this style you'll get nothing but shit.

Despite /ic/ naive ideas, you'll learn much more spending several hours refining your strokes, until you're happy with the results.

>> No.1457612

>>1457600
You must be quite confused, plus you don't seem to have read the thread. For instance:
>What it came down to was intense patience and accuracy. He would think about literally every single stroke before he put it down. Even when he worked in stages (Block in then detail) he would make sure the shape is absolutely correct before continuing. Then he would simplify and destroy what he did if necessary.

You seem to think that the paintings were done in haste, and that this thread is somehow about encouraging people to make hasty paintings. How could you get so disoriented. Drink some water or something.

>> No.1457616
File: 174 KB, 1156x950, The_Death_of_Sardanapalus.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457616

Eugene Delacroix - The Death of Sardanapalus

He's dying so he has all of his horses and slaves and such slaughtered to die with him. Kind of a dick.

>> No.1457617
File: 857 KB, 2099x1060, The_Death_of_Sardanapalus_1844_detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457617

>>1457616
detail

>> No.1457620
File: 548 KB, 1345x1060, The_Death_of_Sardanapalus_study.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457620

>>1457616
>>1457617
Meant to post this (the study) first. The detail is from this study. The first one is the finished version.

>> No.1457644
File: 942 KB, 1406x1057, Fruit_Displayed_on_a_Stand_(c.1881).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457644

Gustave Caillebotte

>> No.1457646
File: 974 KB, 2099x1059, Fruit_Displayed_on_a_Stand_(c.1881)_detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457646

>>1457644
detail

We were talking about this guy in another thread. Some people liked his studies more than his finished paintings, but he's got a lot of paintings where he's plenty loose. There's nothing crazy here, no, but it's kept fresh.

>> No.1457648

>>1457646
i dont like his stuff i have to say, he paints like someone who can't paint

>> No.1457649
File: 941 KB, 869x1060, Sailing_Boats_at_Argenteuil_(c.1888).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457649

>>1457648
That's OK, you're allowed not to like him.

This is Gustave Caillebotte again. Looks tame, but the people who liked his studies should enjoy the following detail (if they ever noticed this thread).

>> No.1457650
File: 960 KB, 2099x1060, Sailing_Boats_at_Argenteuil_(c.1888)_detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457650

>>1457649
detail

>> No.1457661
File: 877 KB, 868x1059, The_Orchestra_at_the_Opera_1870.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457661

Edgar Degas - The Orchestra at the Opera House, 1870

One of my favorite pieces of modern art.

>> No.1457662
File: 683 KB, 1800x950, The_Orchestra_at_the_Opera_1870_detail.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457662

>>1457661
detail

>> No.1457746
File: 169 KB, 1280x960, 2dollaBJcindy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1457746

>>1457302
pls stop painting
thx

>> No.1457753

>>1457746
Don't listen to this guy. Continue painting.

But drop that awful anime shit and learn some real anatomy. You're making DBZ look like John Singer Sargent.

>> No.1458156
File: 751 KB, 800x1060, Skeleton_Smoking.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458156

>> No.1458158
File: 971 KB, 2100x1059, Skeleton_Smoking(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458158

>> No.1458177
File: 384 KB, 866x1059, Manet-Masked_Ball_at_the_Opera_1873.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458177

Loose sketch by Edward Manet.

>> No.1458178
File: 916 KB, 2099x1059, Manet-Masked_Ball_at_the_Opera_1873-(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458178

>>1458177
detail

>> No.1458222

>>1458156
I think you mean whenyouareengulfedinflames.jpg

>> No.1458239

>>1457295
The man is genius.

>> No.1458245

>>1458222
Is that the name? I didn't know so I just described it.

>> No.1458285

>>1458245
>>1458222

I see it was used as the cover of a book with that name.

Apparently this painting is not much bigger than a standard sheet of printer paper.

>> No.1458299

>>1458285
well its just a study he did in class so you wouldn't expect it to be huge or anything

>> No.1458352
File: 969 KB, 1656x985, The_Lion_Hunt_1854_(detail)b.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458352

>>1458351
detail

>> No.1458351
File: 925 KB, 1484x1059, The_Lion_Hunt_1854.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458351

Eugene Delacroix - rough sketch for one of The Lion Hunt paintings

>> No.1458355
File: 972 KB, 1532x1176, The_Lion_Hunt_final.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458355

The Lion Hunt - finalized

>> No.1458363

>>1457377
Hmm, pretty boring in regards to subject matters, but really nice brushwork! Gotta try to learn something from this guy...

>> No.1458365

>>1458351
"rough sketch"...
Please post more

>> No.1458366
File: 87 KB, 800x634, tape_by_turningshadow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458366

Another still life artist who's brushwork I really like is David Cheifetz (goes by the name turningshadows over at Deviant Art)

>> No.1458384
File: 579 KB, 952x1058, Harmony_in_Flesh_&_Red_1869.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458384

>>1458365
OK. I don't have all that many hi-definition paint sketches, but here's one by James Abbott McNeill Whistler.

>> No.1458387
File: 974 KB, 1872x1012, Harmony_in_Flesh_&_Red_1869_(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458387

>>1458384
detail

>> No.1458390

>>1458384
>>1458387
These are fantastic.

>> No.1458394 [DELETED] 
File: 972 KB, 2099x1060, View_of_Paris,_July_1886_(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458394

>>1458393
detail

>> No.1458393
File: 864 KB, 844x1057, Variations_in_Flesh_Color_&_Green-(...)1870-79.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458393

>>1458390
You might like this. Also Whistler.

>> No.1458396
File: 868 KB, 1881x1060, Variations_in_Flesh_Color_&_Green-(...)1870-79_(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458396

>>1458393
detail

>> No.1458425
File: 563 KB, 836x1056, Self_Portrait_Van_Gogh.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458425

>> No.1458426
File: 967 KB, 2099x1058, Self_Portrait_Van_Gogh_(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458426

>>1458425
detail

>> No.1458618

>>1458425
Hardly economic, might as well post Seurat or Freud at this point.

>> No.1458647

>>1458618
You have a point in a way, though Freud had some stellar brush economy. You might want to rethink that. Just because he worked slowly and often layered things doesn't mean he couldn't say quite a lot with big, meaningful brushstrokes.

>> No.1458650

Could use a little feedback on some of my art

http://theflitelessbird.deviantart.com/art/Motherly-373809507

>> No.1458697

>>1458650
Does this have something to do with brush economy or did you just fuck up by posting in this thread?

>> No.1458747

>>1458697
Fucked up ;]

>> No.1458748
File: 644 KB, 1298x1060, A_Seascape_Shipping_by_Moonlight_1864.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458748

OK, to get back to real economy...

Monet, 1864. Rare nocturne from the man. Super loose, but look close and see what he was able to get from it.

>> No.1458749
File: 892 KB, 1944x982, A_Seascape_Shipping_by_Moonlight_1864_(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458749

>>1458748
Aaaaaaand the detail

>> No.1458820

>>1458363
Look up Alla Prima or wet on wet.

>> No.1458848
File: 433 KB, 1536x1382, 1961.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458848

>>1458647
I have decided that I agree with you about Freud.

>> No.1458849
File: 89 KB, 941x501, Jean-_douard Vuillard - Statuettes on the Mantlepiece.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458849

Vuillard. Notice that the statues are just streaks of highlight atop the imprimatura.

>> No.1458851
File: 1.85 MB, 831x1200, Vincent_van_Gogh_-_Le_Moulin_de_blute-fin(1886)small.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458851

>>1458425
a more economic Van Gogh:

>> No.1458859

>>1458851
thats pretty good for van gogh, still from school i think

>> No.1458868
File: 329 KB, 1024x768, P1170325.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458868

I found a 50 GB torrent of paintings if anyone is interested: http://btdigg.org/search?info_hash=98df8b23713747253fde54f22940da1fb007a3bb

(CBR is basically a RAR archive, can open with Sumatra PDF reader too)

>> No.1458870
File: 696 KB, 1422x1060, The_White_Symphony-Three_Girls_c.1868.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458870

One more of those James Abbott McNeill Whistler sketches.

>> No.1458871
File: 876 KB, 2281x1058, The_White_Symphony-Three_Girls_c.1868_(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458871

>>1458870

>> No.1458872 [DELETED] 
File: 335 KB, 645x482, Dale_Holy_Smokes.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1458872

>>1458868
>50 GB torrent of paintings

Man, that's a bit extravagant.

>>1458851
Yeah, that's a nice one from Vinnie. Saved.

>> No.1458920 [DELETED] 

bump

>> No.1458970

>>1458868
Downloading now but no seeds :(

>> No.1459037

>>1458970

Same, swear hardly any torrents work these days

>> No.1459045
File: 904 KB, 1400x840, tekkon.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1459045

ic I come here for help
I really really want to try traditional painting but Im not really sure were to start. should I choose oils or acrilycs? why?
I'm not really good, but Im planning on doing lots of still lifes and edge studies. I don't have A LOT of money thou.. I would still like to give It a try.
what kind of paint should I use? any advice will be greatly appreciated
pros and cons? any recommended painter? tips?

>> No.1459049

>>1459045
Unrelated to this thread, try the questions thread or make your own. Derailing someone else's thread is just rude.

>> No.1459362 [DELETED] 

Bumpin' to remember to put some good images a while later.

>> No.1459422
File: 670 KB, 798x1058, The_Convalescent_c.1872-1887.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1459422

Edgar Degas

>> No.1459423
File: 941 KB, 1926x1057, The_Convalescent_c.1872-1887_(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1459423

>>1459422
detail

Gorgeous.

>> No.1459529
File: 104 KB, 600x480, picture2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1459529

>>1458970
>>1459037

http://btdigg.org/search?info_hash=f5e90dfff4ef0915408d091f985ab62ae7f9f9bd

OK, this is the correct one, the one I'm seeding. (There are 2 torrents of the same set of files out there.)

>> No.1459797
File: 822 KB, 784x1051, The_Thames_in_Ice_1860.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1459797

Whistler

>> No.1459799
File: 975 KB, 1884x1058, The_Thames_in_Ice_1860_(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1459799

>>1459797
detail

>> No.1459804

>>1457586

Probably one of my favorite pieces.

>> No.1459815
File: 972 KB, 2016x944, Frans_Hals_(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1459815

>>1459804
You're in luck, as after some deeper searching I found a high definition version.

>> No.1459818
File: 875 KB, 1709x1093, Frans_Hals_(detail)2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1459818

>>1457586
>>1459815
Another detail

>> No.1459819

>>1457259
As a practitioner of both mediums I agree with you. Although I do believe both theory and practice are very important things to understand. Personally I've found the more I practice and study in the physical medium and theory, the better my digital work becomes. Even in terms of painting.

>> No.1459822

These are great. Thanks for posting them.

>> No.1459944

>>1459815
>>1459818

Holy fuck. Thanks, anon. Looks amazing.

>> No.1460139
File: 184 KB, 598x770, Judith_Geher-study(prada)_2011.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1460139

>>1459822
>>1459944
No problem, guys. I love this stuff.

Here's a study by a contemporary painter named Judith Geher. I don't really know anything about her, nor do I have any super close ups, but you can pretty much see the strokes anyway.

>> No.1460142
File: 164 KB, 697x703, Jason_Shawn _Alexander-undertow.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1460142

Another contemporary painter - Jason Shawn Alexander.

>> No.1460536
File: 514 KB, 884x640, Craig_Mullins_.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1460536

>> No.1460879
File: 596 KB, 1097x1597, etoile[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1460879

Degas

Paint and pastel.

>> No.1460880
File: 594 KB, 1600x1000, etoile-Dancer-on-the-Stage.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1460880

>>1460879
detail

>> No.1461787
File: 969 KB, 1298x1060, Gauguin-Entrance_to_the_City_of_Osny-1882-83.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1461787

Gauguin

>> No.1461788

>>1460880
seems to change color when you look closely at it

>> No.1461789

>>1461788
Different photograph for the full one and the closeup.

>> No.1461790
File: 975 KB, 1512x943, Gauguin-Entrance_to_the_City_of_Osny-1882-83_(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1461790

>>1461787
detail

>> No.1461792

>>1461790
wow those are almost like pixels and what a dry brush

>> No.1461793

>>1459529
oh lawd, thank you

torrenting now. Are these nice quality images?

>> No.1462294

>>1461793
>Are these nice quality images?
Most aren't. But I guess you can easily find your new favorite painter in there.

>> No.1463911
File: 824 KB, 809x1059, Milly_Finch-1833-34_watercolor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1463911

Watercolor by Whistler.

>> No.1463914
File: 967 KB, 2183x1059, Milly_Finch-1833-34_(detail)_watercolor.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1463914

>>1463911
detail

>> No.1463919
File: 738 KB, 1515x1058, In_the_Luxembourg_Gardens-1879.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1463919

It's Sunday. This is a nice leisurely scene by John Singer Sargent.

>> No.1463920
File: 700 KB, 1817x916, In_the_Luxembourg_Gardens-1879-(detail).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1463920

>>1463919

>> No.1463966

>>1463919
hate that guy, he paints so well and all he did with it was the salon, boo.

>> No.1463973

>>1463966
What did you want him to paint? Dragons and spaceships?

>> No.1463978
File: 70 KB, 500x374, 1357021645905.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1463978

>>1463966
"All he did with it" is make gorgeous art that was not quite like that of anyone else. He wed impressionistic flare to academicism in quite a compelling way. He's left one of the greatest legacies of any artist. Everyone doesn't need to be Turner to be artistically valuable. I can get quite a lot out of Sargent that I can't get out of many others.

If you want a rebel or iconoclast, you're looking in the wrong place. If you want poetic beauty and virtuoso craftsmanship, Sargent is a good source. Nevertheless, Sargent's art wasn't without controversy. After all, his Madame X painting caused quite a scandal, even forcing him to take his business to another country. He also carried some pretty risque homo-eroticism into his work.

>> No.1463980
File: 136 KB, 953x634, 11+Violet+Sargent+(1870-1955)+Violet+Sleeping+1908.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1463980

>>1463973
It's gotta be either that or that poster wants him to have become radically experimental. But that's just not who he was. He wanted to be a society painter, and he not only did that, he became possibly the greatest society painter of all time. When I want someone pushing the envelope, I'll look at a different artist, unless of course I want to see someone simply pushing the envelope of how incredibly skilled, confident, and productive an artist can be.

>> No.1463988

>>1463980
let's face it, most of sargents stuff is kind of boring, subject wise. I mean does he have any masterpieces, like a carefully orchestrated composition? Personally I love sargent, I think he could paint a pinecone and make it look fascinating. But I understand where previousanon was coming from. And I think a dragon envisioned through sargent would look fairly dapper, imo.

>> No.1463993
File: 301 KB, 1494x1500, MFA_Sargent_Boit-Daughters.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1463993

>>1463988
>I mean does he have any masterpieces, like a carefully orchestrated composition?

Are you kidding? I mean, if you don't know, then why are you disparaging the man?

Pic related is a widely celebrated masterpiece, subject of mountains of critical analysis.

I could sit all day and post incredible pieces by the man and not run the risk of running out.

I mean, if you want dragons and gladiators and such, that's your business, but that's not quite everyone's cup of tea.

>> No.1463996 [DELETED] 

>>1463993
In its natural habitat. It's quite large.

>> No.1463997
File: 91 KB, 640x480, 2023_MFA385520.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1463997

>>1463993
In its natural habitat. It's quite large.

>> No.1463999
File: 57 KB, 940x550, GassedBig[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1463999

>>1463988
arguably it's this thing, but he said himself that he considered mme. x to be his best

>> No.1464001
File: 273 KB, 1155x979, Street in Venice 1882.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464001

>>1463988
A few which I'd say are masterpieces:

>> No.1464003
File: 593 KB, 700x1398, John-Singer-Sargent-Madame_X.jpg.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464003

>>1463999
Did he? It surely is a masterpiece. Stunning in person as well.

>> No.1464004
File: 640 KB, 700x1027, Sargent.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464004

>>1464001

>> No.1464005
File: 63 KB, 960x621, 535922_438087052945207_2144503317_n.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464005

>>1463988
>I mean does he have any masterpieces, like a carefully orchestrated composition?

Wait, what about these do you think is not carefully orchestrated?:
>>1457236
>>1463919

>Personally I love sargent

b-but it doesn't seem like it. Shouldn't you at least look at his work?

>> No.1464006
File: 138 KB, 1138x900, Venetian Interior 1880-1882.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464006

>>1464004

>> No.1464008
File: 313 KB, 1142x908, Sargent_John_Singer_Venetian_Wineshop.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464008

I will also post a handful of Sargent pieces.

>> No.1464009
File: 116 KB, 793x1132, Sargent_John_Singer_Spanish_Dancer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464009

A study for this previously posted piece:
>>1464005

>> No.1464010
File: 69 KB, 384x441, 3853860657_63eb510778.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464010

Another study for this piece:
>>1464005

>> No.1464011

>>1463993
don't assume identities on an anonymous forum, it's really pretty rude. I'm not salon (>>1463966) guy, I was just saying I see where he's coming from. Lots of Sargents stuff is just sort of ordinary-observational stuff.

>> No.1464012
File: 128 KB, 898x590, Sketch_After_El_Jaleo.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464012

Another study for this:
>>1464005

>> No.1464013
File: 146 KB, 588x700, sargent2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464013

>>1463993
I'm not confusing you. You made the odd comment about composition and you were affirmative in your estimation of the value of a Sargent dragon.

I don't see his work as ordinary observational stuff at all. I find it culturally rich, poetic, and imbued with a special character. I mean, it's hard for me to know what you like.

>> No.1464015
File: 357 KB, 1600x1034, 6yWpnbp.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464015

No Sargent dragon. Maybe crocodiles will do.

>> No.1464016
File: 181 KB, 1209x944, 4baf88ea13ef8d79a1c6cb52957293ca.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464016

>> No.1464017
File: 294 KB, 502x1000, Sargent_Miss_Ellen_Terry_as_Lady_Macbeth.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464017

>> No.1464019
File: 372 KB, 1288x1019, sargent_john_singer_reconnoitering-761e0d0.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464019

>> No.1464022
File: 486 KB, 900x915, JohnSingerSargent_Atlasandthe_Hesperides_BostonMOFA_1922_1925Large.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464022

>> No.1464025
File: 58 KB, 782x512, (Two) Spanish Male Dancer before Seated Figures 1879 2.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464025

I was being fastidious by agreeing that a Sargent dragon would look dapper. Who even uses the word 'dapper' anymore? But it's the internet, and people like to take something and run with it, that's fine. I'm just poking at your favorite artist, that's all. God forbid.

>> No.1464028

>>1464025
facetious*

fuckin autocorrect

>> No.1464045
File: 101 KB, 428x497, sargent_450_copy.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464045

>>1464025
He's not my favorite artist.

If you do want monsters and mythic drama, you can get it from his many murals.

>> No.1464047
File: 75 KB, 415x500, 975169482_535e91e040.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464047

>>1464046

>> No.1464046
File: 75 KB, 432x469, sargent_450 copy 3.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464046

>>1464045

>> No.1464049
File: 30 KB, 500x373, 701117530_0940c177dc.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464049

>>1464047

>> No.1464051
File: 781 KB, 1000x660, a0100212_4970864060e06.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464051

>>1464050

>> No.1464050
File: 1.27 MB, 1000x747, BPL-Sargent.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464050

>>1464049

>> No.1464052
File: 95 KB, 1130x825, 3_1.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464052

>>1464051

>> No.1464055
File: 92 KB, 450x518, sargent_450 copy 5.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464055

>>1464053
Eh, OK, that's enough of that.

>> No.1464053
File: 107 KB, 417x535, sargent_450.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464053

>> No.1464058
File: 42 KB, 538x300, Hell.jpg~original.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464058

Eh, after the dragon thing, may as well add this monster at the gates of hell, piling souls into its mouth.

>> No.1464062

>>1464058
Haha, well this is what I meant. It's interesting to see more imaginative pieces of his although they clearly aren't up to his other works.

>> No.1464080

>>1464019
What was this painted with?

>> No.1464095 [DELETED] 

>>1464080
What media? Oil.

>> No.1464096
File: 710 KB, 2095x772, Gassed.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1464096

>>1463999
That's missing some pieces.

>> No.1464097

>>1464096
Notice the soccer game (or baseball?) going on in the distance

>> No.1464174

>>1464097
Um...maybe. I'm not really sure that's actually happening.

>> No.1464195

>>1464097

I thought you were joking but yeah you can actually see them playing football back there. Nice detail.

>> No.1465916 [DELETED] 

bomp

>> No.1465918

>>1464003
i'd do her

>> No.1465919
File: 207 KB, 828x464, details.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1465919

>>1464097
definitely futbol

>> No.1465931

>>1464174
I am

>> No.1467623 [DELETED] 

bop

>> No.1467736
File: 493 KB, 956x1280, fig2_HR.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1467736

A little Stuart Davis sketch. Always impressed by people who'll go out in a busy place, at night even, and make a color oil sketch of the action.

It's great how he pops the dominant figure out by making it a dark form on top of all that light.

There's not a detail shot for this one, but the image is big and clear and you can see the speedy brushwork.

>> No.1467748
File: 96 KB, 883x1147, 1906+Portrait+of+My+Father+oil+on+canvas+72+x+55.9+cm.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1467748

George Bellows

The guy's a wizard of painting. Great, great economy.

You may know him from his boxing paintings. Obviously a big influence on the contemporary painter Phil Hale.

>> No.1469229 [DELETED] 

Bump of freedom

>> No.1470459
File: 238 KB, 1024x849, george+bellows+the+big+dory.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1470459

S'more George Bellows for my /ic/ chums.

>> No.1470466
File: 180 KB, 1299x719, Untitled.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1470466

>> No.1470467

please archive

>> No.1470495

>>1458355
>>1458351
Is it wrong that I prefere the rough sketch much more?

>> No.1470984 [DELETED] 

Bump against summer plague.

>> No.1471004
File: 434 KB, 1024x768, Fintan Switzer.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1471004

brush economy... an interesting term i'm surprised i've not really come across before.

>> No.1472053
File: 143 KB, 825x1056, Anders_Zorn_-_Hins_Anders_(1904).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1472053

>>1471004
It's really a cool thing to study, I love how Zorn handled hands they're so simple and yet they read clearly as hands

>> No.1472056

>>1471004
do you even paint

>> No.1472059

>>1472053
It's called suggestion, check out some Goya and have your mind blown

>> No.1472064
File: 336 KB, 1600x947, Francisco de Goya Dos viejos comiendo Two Old People Eating.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1472064

>>1472059
pic related

>> No.1472068
File: 224 KB, 714x1600, P00759.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1472068

>>1472064

>> No.1472071

>>1472053
>simple
see >>1472056

>> No.1472072
File: 212 KB, 1000x1736, saturn_1000.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1472072

>>1472068

>> No.1472076
File: 38 KB, 600x1198, Goya_women_man.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1472076

>>1472072


>>1472071
lol

>> No.1472077
File: 652 KB, 2100x634, Goya_y_Lucientes_Francisco_de-Black_Paintings_Witches_Sabbath_The_Great_He-Goat.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1472077

>>1472076

>> No.1472556
File: 49 KB, 352x264, hals.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1472556

>>1472056
yes, i do in fact paint an awful lot and am reasonably successful. i was merely stating it's not a phrase i've come in contact with, but i've always understood great brushwork and the power of suggestion.

>> No.1473215 [DELETED] 

needs a bumpin'

>> No.1473303
File: 285 KB, 890x1024, image.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1473303

Can't have Sargent without some Velazquez in the mix.

>> No.1474952
File: 448 KB, 1697x1873, Velazquez_Sibyl_Meadows_Museum.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1474952

>>1473303
velazquez must've been a wonderful person to meet

>> No.1474977

this is one sexy motherfucking thread

can I ask if these sketches like:
>>1458871
>>1458870

are done as under painting, or on a different canvas?

>> No.1474982

>>1474977
That's a finished work. It's just a relatively fast painting. Some of the other things itt are sketches for more polished paintings:
>>1458351

I don't think any of the sketchy things itt were intended to be underpaintings for more solid paintings. They're either free-standing pieces or studies for more polished works painted on new supports.

Often underpaintings CAN begin like these, especially with alla prima (wet-on-wet) painting, which starts loose and general, then goes in and works it to get it more precise.

>> No.1474987

>>1474982
ah, thanks

>> No.1474989

>>1470467
its on the archive voting site

>> No.1474996

>>1474982
even if its an underpainting its still a great display of brush economy, calm down

>> No.1475046

>>1474996
I think you're having a reading comprehension issue. Firstly, it's really not an underpainting, as I already said. It's a stand-alone piece. I know it's a good example of brush economy because I posted it.

Not sure why you think answering a question for someone is something negative.

>> No.1475054

>>1475046
wsant talking about the whistler, i thought the delcroix was the early stages of the work, not an oil sketch

>> No.1475095

>>1475054
No, the Delacroix is a study. That's why I called it a sketch for a more polished painting. What exactly was your issue with this? It's not an underpainting, and how could it be? How would we have a high definition color photo of the underpainting of a painting from 1854?

>> No.1475099

>>1475095
>art work has never been left unfinished

I don't have a problem at all really, I just thought oyu guys were bickering over silly semantics when in reality goods brush economy is good brush economy regardless of the medium/stage in the work

>> No.1475110

>>1475099
I posted the final painting along with it.

Someone asked a question that I was perfectly happy to answer. You imagined the bickering.

>> No.1475277
File: 142 KB, 704x568, 2006AN8460_jpg_l.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1475277

>> No.1475280
File: 54 KB, 800x420, 82824_427052.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1475280

>> No.1476406 [DELETED] 

badump

>> No.1476408
File: 279 KB, 316x400, richard schmid.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1476408

>>1476406
im not sure how economic Richard Schmid is, but I like his strokes

>> No.1476418 [DELETED] 

>>1476408
Oh, there's some economy on display there for sure. Kinda small though...

>> No.1476426
File: 55 KB, 487x600, nicolai ivanovich.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1476426

>>1476418
yeah I havent been able to find some highquality images of his works :/

ivanovich

>> No.1476437
File: 602 KB, 1500x701, Richard Schmid - Alla Prima-51.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1476437

>>1476408
Schmid got beautiful brush economy, especially in his quick landscape sketches.

>> No.1476442

>>1476426
TOO BAD HE PAINTS GIRLS THAT LOOK LIKE THEY HAVE DOWN SYNDROM.. OR THESE WOULD BE KIND OF NICE.

>> No.1476443

>>1476442
MAYBE THATS WHAT HE INTENDED BECAUSE AUTISM IS SEXY AS FUCK

>> No.1476450
File: 80 KB, 547x720, Nikolay_Fechin_painting_01.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1476450

>>1476443
also, i meant Fechin, not ivanovich, herpaderp

>> No.1476465

>>1476442
they look nothing like downs

>> No.1476469

>>1476465
they do sort of have large, wide-spaced eyes.

>> No.1476484

Anyone else think Jenny saville is a god in regar to brush economy? It's chaotic but also very subtle.

How would one achieve her style? Work in layers and let parts dry first?

>> No.1476528

>>1458425

Looking at this painting for the hundredth time, i thought it was nothing. I looked at the strokes again, noticing that every single line took some thought. in some form, there was thought. That's a lot of thought, I thought. Then looking closer, for the first time i looked at the eyes. I saw pain, I saw rage, hatred. for the first time looking at this painting, i cried. I cried looking at this painting, because i saw myself.

>> No.1476539
File: 730 KB, 2540x1159, Jenny_Saville-close.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1476539

>>1476484
I don't know how she does it, other than it's brilliant up close. Mishmash of hues, gashes and slashes and splatters of paint that make something completely coherent. They're very big paintings, I can tell you that much.

>> No.1476542

>>1476539
im guessing some basic tones at the first layer, then she hash out the detail. I dunno either htough

>> No.1476541
File: 1.61 MB, 1024x1364, Jenny_Saville.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1476541

>>1476484
Maybe you can do some analysis of this one, as it's not as polished.

>> No.1476549
File: 268 KB, 1200x800, jenny-saville-matrix[1].jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1476549

>>1476539
i saw one down at the mona, it was pretty big, i'll show you which one just a sec..it's this one, and that's actually where i saw it lol, you get an idea of the size because of the curtain thing. it's very startling, the strokes actually remind me of like a way less ordered lucien freud and there isn't actually all that much impasto on her stuff, so she really must smoosh it on there, and it doesn't look like she uses any medium or anything, very clever.

>> No.1476550

>>1476549
it's actually like a super refined chumbum park lol

>> No.1476557

>>1476408
damn, this one's sick.

>> No.1476562

>>1476549
>just a sec..it's this one
wot

>> No.1476564

>>1463988
Look up his Triumph of religion paintings in the Boston public library. Not exactly dragons, but mythology and allegorry noneytheless, coupled with his virtuoso painting style.

>> No.1476566

>>1476562
that feel when talking dialogue on 4chan

>> No.1476569
File: 252 KB, 1170x1080, large-interior-w11.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1476569

>>1476562
>tfw its buck angel

>> No.1476600

>>1476539
wow she's the godess of ugly
I never seen someone capture ugly this well

>> No.1478458

...

>> No.1478486

>>1478458
we should get this thread archived

>> No.1478502

>>1478486
Know its good but not that good.

>> No.1478506

>>1478502
how about a rar for the sticky?

>> No.1478508

>>1478486
>>1478502
all threads are archived

>> No.1478560

>>1478508
NSA please go

>> No.1478703 [DELETED] 

Needs a bumpin'

>> No.1478707

>>1478560
http://fuuka.warosu.org/ic/thread/1457236#p1478560

>> No.1480689 [DELETED] 

Live another day

>> No.1480913
File: 122 KB, 676x800, summer-diana-surprised-at-her-bath-by-actaeon-1822(1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1480913

Holy crap look at this Delacroix study from 1822. It's like a step away from abstract expressionism. He was gettin' all Turner and such.

>> No.1480922

>>1480913

ok very interesting.

But wtf am I looking at ?

>> No.1480935

>>1480922
Sex.

>> No.1480937

>>1480913
pretty much impossible to read without color

>> No.1480940
File: 194 KB, 596x720, the-summer-diana-surprised-by-actaeon-1863(1).jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1480940

>>1480913
>>1480922
>>1480937
"The Summer Diana Surprised at her Bath by Actaeon"

This is what that was for.

>> No.1482547 [DELETED] 

...

>> No.1482623

>>1457295
>>1458239
not really insane, just well placed stylization of standard brush work.

>> No.1482707
File: 405 KB, 1338x898, Screenshot - 06272013 - 11:01:52 AM.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
1482707

google.com/culturalinstitute/asset-viewer/the-starry-night/bgEuwDxel93-Pg

>> No.1482785

>>1457367
I haven't painted oil in a while, mainly acrylic but your "take a break" advice is very sound.

I also find it important to physically step back from the painting every few minutes as well. I work larger paintings, usually at least 24" x 36" and when doing the final detail work I find it helps to get my stupid face more than a foot away from the canvas so I can view it like a normal person would see it hanging on the wall.

Those detail marks that look "rad" when I'm right there at the canvas may not look the same from ten-15 feet out.

I also make a point to change up my light source (in my studio, not in my actual painting) maybe every day, as overhead light may look different than side or bottom sourced light as it hits the canvas. This is good to check my strokes as well.

>> No.1483030

hey guys what is the best place to find references of paintings done by the old masters?