/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7120679
original

>>7120679
That's great anon. You can learn a lot from master studies. I like the blending modes you used. Do you have any original work?

>>7120679
Squint please

>>7120679
so not a study, a redo...? Not something I see done often.
some notes: Her body is harder to read between her legs. And it was an issue with the OG too, but her upper arm has a tangent with some hair shape behind it. Your change to the hair rendering wasn't carried through to that hair strand either.

>>7120687
care to elaborate anon? I think that OP's work is pretty good.

>>7120691
Having stuff read is the most important part of splash art, if you squint while looking at the two the original still reads while ops edit becomes mush.

>>7120693
do you think that the values are unclear+shapes and perspective?

>>7120679
you put vaseline and smeared shit on it, bad job

>>7120679
you either traced or painted over the original drawing. Why the face, effects and every background detail are EXACTLY the same??

>>7120716
Not exactly the same but I think they look identical because it`s background, they are similar in their lack of detail so it`s easier to get it right. Op did a good job, it just lacks a lot of the definition on the legs and a little more of a focus on color composition (original is more blue and purple, anons is white and pink)

>>7120679
can you show an original work?

>>7120679
why whould chengwei remake his old artwork?

>>7120720
>Not exactly the same
original pixels are there, zoom in. he just filtered the background, didn't paint it.

a good painting is somewhere in between the original and your paintover
the original has too many hard edges, yours not enough

>>7120679
You didn't redo shit, you vaguely painted over it and added your signature like the loser you are.

>>7120909
Fuck, the signature is from the original artist.
Other point still stands.

>>7120685
>>7120725
heres something im working on

>>7120909
nuh uh

>>7121758
what the fuck is this

>>7121758
the absolute state
we deserve ai, god is punishing us

>>7120679
I think yours is sovl the original sucks dicks.

>>7120679
I think the original is sovl and yours sucks dicks.

>>7121788
wdym? Anon's work is pretty good

>>7121827
what part is his work?

>>7120914
>redoing a piece
>somehow the original artist's signature is still there
huge oversight, almost unconceivable

>>7121758
You're not supposed to photobash with other peoples paintings you bumbling fucking moron

>>7121758
What you did to those statues in the bg, which some dude painted as a study because I've seen that exact ref, is the equivalent of trying to hammer in a nail with the handle of the hammer.
You're incomprehensibly retarded mate

>>7121858
>>7121865
atleast im doing something fags, when was the last time your ass did something? thats what i thought now hush.

>>7121869
Try actually drawing instead of horrendously larping as an artist

>>7121874
I do, its just insanely hard to create realism out your ass from scratch and have it look amazing. plus this kinda work also helps. but you wouldnt know since you probably draw some funko pop tier cartoon shit.

>>7120679
I think you should get raped by a pack of niggers, you fucking faggot

>>7121888
kek struck a nerve?

>>7121888
Agreed. He traced and made shit worse

>open kaisa.png
>new layer
>set clone stamp ref to lower layer
>clone stamp the image pixel by pixel
>adjust the colors to be shittier

How's my study guys?

>>7121914
stop hating, the colors are not shittier. the original has a nasty blue filter on it, everywhere you select with a eyedropper its just a shade of blue, no color vatiety. it actually takes skill to do that like it or not

>>7121918

>>7121921
post work

>>7121918
>everywhere you select with a eyedropper its just a shade of blue
almost like it's intentional or something

>>7121940
ok? but its not in accordance to reality nor does it look good to a trained eye. whole scene looks like its under a blue uv light.

>>7121945
>accordance to reality
lol
>whole scene looks like its under a blue uv light.
almost like it's intentional or something

>>7121948
your art also intentionaly sucks i get it no worries

>>7121961
Yep hand picked artists from one of the biggest game companies sucks at art, you obviously know better and putting a saturated color of a completely different hue way off to the side away from the focal point is better.
Try to understand why artists much better than yourself do the things they do, it'll help you improve, I guarantee it

>>7121973
its ok for the game and its style but i went for a more painterly classical approach. the reason i even picked that picture is because i think everything else is very sick and cool besides the colors and over rendering.

Guys he's trolling, quit giving him (you)s, its becoming embarrassing

>>7121985
im genuinely not, if you give me a coherent answer as to why mine is worse i will gladly agree and move on. so far the negatives i've got is "colors look worse just because". the input i did agree on is it not being able to read as well but thats very minor.

>>7121994
>but thats very minor.
The OG pic was fine. Your changes were to your taste, but also make some minor things worse. what else is there to say?

>>7120679
>>7120680
>redid
>literally just a shitty instagram filter
lol?

>>7121994
Anon it's the same fucking image you just adjusted the color balance and smudged some of the rendering up
You didn't even erase the original artists signature.

>>7121996
>>7121999
>yea bro the og one definently doesnt look cheaper haha i swear im not talking shit because its an ic anon and crabs in a bucket mentality.

>7122005
you're mentally retarded.

>>7120679
>thoughts?
yeah stop playing games for broccoli headed teenagers

>>7122005
this has to be trolling lmfao

>>7120679
Your biggest mistake was sharing a study.
What did you aim to learn from this?

>>7123629
>a study
lol

>>7122005
>turn her hair into literal nothing but random strokes
>le improvement
lel

its not a troll, it's that guy that used to paint over photos with mixer brush and some layer effects in DTIYS threads