/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>7113549
It's only the one trick pony insecure crybabies that complain about Ai.

>>7113549
>>7113552
>good artists shouldn't complain about their work being stolen and ripped off!

>>7113573
Isn't that what "good" artists do anyway?

>>7113573
Your work was stolen the moment you put it on the internet faggot.

>pajeet calling others pajeets for not acting like a pajeet
LOL

>>7113549
it's an eyesore, that's more than enough reason to complain. not to mention AI bros spam their slop everywhere which wastes bandwidth, storage space and moderation time.

What's with all the AI blacked shit?

>>7113585
This, I can't google shit anymore or hardly use any websites where I used to look for artistic inspo because it's all filled with completely worthless ai slop

>>7113583
Complaining and whining instead of doing what you love for the sake of it, is peak pajeet behaviour. No one's gonna subscribe to your patreon, faggot.

>>7113598
That's "democratizing art" for ya.

>>7113602
Good. Don't trust jewgle. Find inspo from

1. Irl
2. Proper art books, comic books
3. Designated sites such as danbooru.

Stop being a 'serve me everything' retard.

>>7113602
"thing you want" before:2021

>>7113608
>giving money to Jewbooru
Yeah nah. There are better places to go too for inspo.

>>7113598
I guess forcing people to draw your scat fetish by threatening to dox them stopped working.

>>7113549
>Good artists have no reason to complain about AI.
I understand what you mean but I'm kinda fed up seeing an AI production where a human could have done it. Yesterday I saw a flyer about heart diseases at my local drugstore and the picture was made by an AI. The day before I saw AI photographs in a local magazine.

Sure there is a human writing a prompt, but those pictures tried to imitate photographs whithout having to pay a model, a photographer, a studio, a graphist... and so on and so forth...*snirrfl*
I admit that AI is just a tool and that you have to train yourself in order to get exactly what you want with it but I feel that's unfair and hypocritical to use this in commercial productions in this day and age. Sure, good artists don't have to worry much but I feel that patrons using AI instead of real people to reduce costs are kinda gatekeeping younger artists (not only in the illustration field) to live from their work.

>>7113585
>it's an eyesore
fucking this, it's ugly and I'm tired of dumb niggers spamming every piece of shit the ai shits out like anyone wants to see it
it's such a fucking pointless "medium" why would anyone ever look at it when they can just prompt a picture themselves and getting something more in line with their taste?

>>7113549
>Horses shouldn't complain about cars!
>A good, strong horse will be always better than a mere machine, only weak horses struggle with competing against automobiles
Do you have brain damage

>>7113583
Christian and Aryan brother race loving AI art with chad Indian. You race traitor and gay is you not like AI art

>>7113752
And you’re an illiterate retard.

>>7113752
>christcucks and street shitters are literal cattle
tell me something new

>>7113739
It is not unfair or hypocritical. It is capitalism. If there is a way to do it faster and more efficiently. People will use it. No other way around it.

>>7113744
>uses an analogy that can not address nuances.

Please reconsider who has brain damage.

It's my turn to make the next AI bait thread.

>>7113982
what fucking nuances are you talking about, retard?
This issue really is that simple. Jobs growing obsolete due to new technologies is nothing new.

>>7113979
>It is not unfair or hypocritical. It is capitalism.
Same thing.

>>7113608
>>7113720
>danbooru
>aka jewbooru
qrd? I personally peruse through gelbooru from time to time but not for inspiration
>>7113739
it was my understanding at the artificial arts would be mostly used by commercial entities so they could, per usual, cut costs and skimp out on paying people
>>7113979
is it only capitalism? I'm only asking because in certain circles the Big C is used as a boogeyman

>>7113580
Did you forget that dmca is a thing, dumbfuck?

>>7113580

by that logic by leaving your house entrance open means it's free for everyone to come in and take your shit

>>7114244
>he doesn't know

>>7113979
True, capitalism is not unfair or hypocritical. Everybody had the same chance to be born into a family that sits on hoarded generational wealth from slavery and genocide. Humanity is blessed by capitalism.
Finally artists can cut down their work with the help of AI and do something actually useful like becoming influencers to propagandize energy drinks and dieting powders.

>>7113549
People will start adding that fancy pose and story-telling art into the training data, then AI will be able to produce those too.

>>7114329
If you work hard you can do a little bit of slavery and genocide and leave some wealth for your kids. If they do a little genocide and slavery for their kids the wealth will gradually accue. See how it works?

>>7113979
> t. Temu shopper

>>7113549
It's complicated, for example as part of my job I have to take care of the ads on my division, since the marketing department didn't have the pics I needed I prompted them, HQ gave me the thumbs up and we got a good marketing campaign with no one complaining about AI or anything, so a part of the back, on the other hand I sometimes make drawings in my tablet to relax myself or just because I got this or that idea, similarly sometimes I find some good AI art, but more often than not I prefer the made-by-human work simply because there is a certain subjetive emotion which AI can't replicate.

I personally find art is more about subjective experience than optimizing productivity.

>>7113549
I'm not against AI. I think it's a fun tool.
Having said that, AIfags are insecure babies with shit arguments.
>Why don't you try to tell coheremt stories with your art instead of just "whoooa look pretty gyal" like some pajeet?
Two prong.
General works appeal to general audiences and advertise the artist through shareability. If an artist is capable of doing more specific pieces, they often post those alongside it, those are conveniently ignored by you and the populace until the artist develops a folliwing from their brand.
At that point, the artist will have their work fed into a model and their style will be learned anyway. It's a temporary nonsolution that becomes moot when it's brought up.

>>7113580
>On the internet it's free
Images are, but work is not. I can save a picture from some professional's artstation, and even upload it, but if I try to pass it off as my own then it becomes a problem because I would then be trying to directly profit off of content I did not make in the same market as the original.

>>7114116
The big C is good. It's not a boogeyman. But it has it's downsides. Human beings cannot create a fair and just system and that's just how it is.

>>7113994
>jobs going obsolete.

The nuance is that it is ART. It is more of a form of human expression rather than an actual job. People who have nothing good to express are the ones worries. And it's Good. Only a few great exceptional artists deserve payment for their creative expressions.

>>7114244
Unironically yes lol.

I put my art out in the internet too. And I know there is not gonna be any fucking "fair use" of it.

>>7114355
Ai doesn't work that way retard. It can barely stay coherent between gens. It's a very long time until it'll be able to make a comic book.

>>7114442
>if I try to pass it off as my own then it becomes a problem because I would then be trying to directly profit off of content I did not make in the same market as the original.

AI art is as much stealing as you using reference for your work.

Or maybe it is stealing. But guess what, we artists are too insignificant for anyone to give a fuck to enforce laws against this. What's the point in crying?

>>7114442
You can feed an AI model kim jung gi's style but you know AI will not be able to do what he did. No one will. It was his expression, he had unique thoughts and skills that he put into paper. Training lora_kim_jung_gi.safetensors is not gonna replicate that.

>>7114535
>we artists
saar, please do the needful

>>7114546
Done the needful sirs

>>7114535
>AI art is as much stealing as you using reference for your work.
Always with the same retarded strawman that gives away the fact you're a tourist.

>>7114254
>glaze it or lose it!

>>7114530
>Human beings cannot create a fair and just system and that's just how it is.
You seem to lack creativity.

>>7114780
I really don't understand your viewpoint tho. Even if you feel like this is stealing nobody wants to acknowledge it as such, like I said, it is a very insignificant thing. The government barely puts any effort to stop the pirates who steal from multimillion dollar video game companies and you think your gay furry porn in patreon is any better?

>>7114878
When we used creativity in governance, we found creative ways to troll and torture the weak. That is the extent of human creativity.

>>7114535
>AI art is as much stealing as you using reference for your work.
You're literally too lazy to even pick up the goddamn pen, howie

>>7113752
>stonetos
Since I saw his fitness=fascist strip I had a suspicion that he is a glowie plant.

>>7114634
>fb_img

>>7115011
>implying I cannot post pics from my fb account

I am also unorganised af and lost my old sketchbook

>>7114988
I am not lazy to pick up a pen. I find it fun and enjoyable, which will keep me continuing this hobby while most will quit cause they thought they can make this a primary source of income.

>>7113752
Because stonetoss's art is what his fans actually care about. Also it's funny how he turned out to be a sniveling crybaby who needed to whine to Musk about getting doxed.

>>7114244
As long as they leave an exact duplicate of the same utility and value in its place (or, better yet, take the duplicate, leave the original), fine by me.

>>7114532
>The nuance is that it is ART. It is more of a form of human expression rather than an actual job
Ah, I see that you know literally nothing of the art history. Opinion discarded.

>>7114834
Glazing takes fucking hours just for one piece.

>>7113979
Sometime I forget that /IC/ is the board with the lowest IQ but then I see posts like this one

>>7115804
me on the right

>>7115694
>Art history

copium such as this won't take away the fact that art ultimately has no practical productive value, and only can be capitalised if i entertains the masses.

>>7115804
talking about the iq meme as a sure-shot scale for intelligence is a rule of thumb oto detect turbo autists.

>>7113549
>Good artists have no reason to complain about AI.
It's spam polluting the internet. I can no longer find anything without being bombarded by this trash.

>>7113573
Most of them do that anyway just without the ai

>>7116002
>filter ai posts and related keywords
>still comes up on feed because the “artists” paid for ads
Friendly reminder to always mass report ai content as spam

>>7116002
>It's spam polluting the internet.
No, shitty artists are.

>>7116422
Incorrect, I want to see human art. Even less skilled artists making mistakes are charming, AI is not.

>>7116437
You're like that because you're trash too.

>>7116438
lol

Fuck this shit
hide and sage
go draw