[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 2.38 MB, 2017x4096, 1701994095750.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7045634 No.7045634 [Reply] [Original]

Is this art work good?

>> No.7045637

>>7045634
why is he naked

>> No.7045638

>>7045634
no

>> No.7045641

>>7045637
Is it a problem?

>> No.7045645

>>7045634
masterpiece. A window in the thought patterns of horny little girls

>> No.7045651

>>7045634
No. Depiction of nude adult with a schoolchild is the same, and obvious same intent, as "pride parade" freaks exposing themselves to underage bystanders. You should be in prison.

>> No.7045659

>>7045651
He isn't an adult, he is 17.

>> No.7046035 [DELETED] 
File: 1.55 MB, 640x610, gross-disgusted.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7046035

>>7045634
Hey, I'm not the anon father, but I agree with the question of why is he naked?
It's not that it's a problem, but what is the plot of the scene???, a young woman dressed with a backpack walking with another naked person, I mean she doesn't say anything that you're trying to capture so that others can say if it's good or if they have to understand what the hell he is trying to express.

Osea deja de enojarte

>> No.7046040

>>7045641
No, why he naked

>> No.7046058

>>7045634
>>7045637
The real question is, why isn't she naked?

>> No.7046070

>>7045634
how many more times will you make this thread. It's not good

>> No.7046078

>>7045634
Ugly ass body.

>> No.7046242

>>7045634
Brap!

>> No.7046257

>naked
>still has headphones
wtf

>> No.7046686

>>7045634
Horrible

>> No.7047141

>>7045634
>Is this artwork good?
No.

>> No.7047146

>>7047141
To elaborate. Subject matter aside, it's mainly the poor anatomy, and poor rendering. The nude figure has no flow at all, and lacks all of the boney landmarks which should be there regardless of style. The rendering is completely nonsensical with no clear direction of light. On the nude figure it appears that the lighting is coming from somewhere on the right, but the girl's backpack is being lit from the left. The backpack in particular is so bad it looks like it's a completely seperate drawing inserted over top. Also the girl's neck is turning way too much. If you want her to face the camera at this angle you would need the torso to twist to make up for the angle.

>> No.7047297

>>7045634
Stop attention whoring this one shit western animu deviant art dog shit and read the Vilppu Drawing Manual. You don’t have any understanding of form, proportions, or anatomy.

>> No.7047318

>>7047297
One has to attention whore to get any in depth or worthwhile criticism on this board.

>> No.7047369

>>7047318
you could have drawn dozens more things between now and the last time you posted this shit

>> No.7047472

>>7047369
>implying I'm OP
it's an anonymous forum nigger, don't assume everyone's the same person

>> No.7047624

>>7047318
Then why hasn’t OP done anything with the criticism they received in the past twelve incarnations of this same attention whore thread?


>>7047472
>>7047369
You might as well be OP. You fucks are all the same. The anon’s point still stands

>> No.7047628
File: 240 KB, 720x1072, Screenshot_20240205-033918~2.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7047628

Saw this on facebook

>> No.7047870

>>7047628
Link?

>> No.7049059

>>7047318
I gave specific critique and it has no replies. Something tells me that people posting this crap don't actually want critique.