[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

View post   
File: 2.38 MB, 2017x4096, 1701994095750.png [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
7006258 No.7006258 [Reply] [Original]

What do you think of this art piece?

>> No.7006266

>>7006258
Again?

>> No.7006271

>>7006266
yes

>> No.7006288

>>7006258
>poorly constructed
>pedophillic
>not appealing
get to work instead of posting

>> No.7006302

>>7006288
How is it poorly constructed, pedophillic and not appealing?

>> No.7006312

>>7006302
>constructed
fucked spine and eyes and bad proportions for starters
>pedophillic
child with naked man pretty obvious
>not appealing
it's ugly and not because of the subject matter. The bizarre construction and proportions and perspective do a lot of that.

I'm not going to say anything else. People that are gmi will accept they are bad and work on that. A permabeg will argue forever and never change anything

>> No.7006317

>>7006312
there is nothing wrong with the proportions

>> No.7006332

>>7006258
This sucks and if I remember the last thread correctly you traced different drawings to make a frankenstein creation.