/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Is this why almost everybody is afraid to post work, because they may go through a humiliation ritual by merely providing an input?
>Wah! He redrew a drawing from an untouchable artist!
Bunch of vindictive bitches, the lot of you.

>>6961545
what's the problem?
it went from undefined moe blob garbage to something at least resembling a face
>Inb4 seething weeboids come to defend their chingchong artist that draws a girl punching with her thumb pointing down for some reason

>>6961594
4chan is basically an open arena. I wouldn't pay much attention to the crabs. there are some real humans lurking here, still.

Maybe, I think it's just people failing to put their money where their mouth is. But I'm not totally bent on people posting their work, if it's advice
The quality of the advice will speak for itself, and that being backed by skilled artists will just be reassurance
It's not like we say the sky is blue and some asshole goes "where is your degree in meteorology?"

People shouldn't be scared and recognize any hate as just text on screen by a literally who
Cause there's people here dedicated on keeping this place cool,
I said the beg thread was good, got made fun of and then went to the latest one and found several posts by anons that are genuinely good supportive advice.
And personally I plan to use the beg thread anytime I need a second opinion. Like going to a doctor

>>6961545
new here?

>>6961594
>Wah! He redrew a drawing from an untouchable artist!
This is a factor. I did a paintover years ago(of a popular artist) and got a similar(but more split) reaction. I agreed with the dissenters of my attempt in some regards too though.

>>6961545
>look good objectively
kek

>>6961545

>>6961605
>It's not like we say the sky is blue and some asshole goes "where is your degree in meteorology?"
Yeah, first day on earth?
>>6961545
btw op if you used pic related it would have been funnier

>>6961545
They both suck. The idea of a static floating punch pose with no speedlines or effects to show movement is just boring but it’s saved by bikini coom.

>>6961545
schizo screencap
utter garbage

>>6961594
We're afraid an army of frogposters will show up on our public profiles.

>>6961545
you really thought making a post from a thread that probably archived like a day ago was worth making another thread for?

>>6961545
>>6961685
The fact that this is the fifth time in a week that some faggot had made a continuation to a prior nodraw thread lets me know how much of a absolute no life loser that's starving for human interaction op really is.

>>6961631
>redrawing it shitty on purpose makes the original bad

Imo the problem is that the artist had the head tilted slightly away from the viewer which allows em to get away with the facial profile he went with and is parallel with the line of action the arms got goin on, but mr anon decided to make the head a flat side view parallel with the viewer which kinda ruins the flow of the pose

Don't know who the original artist is but they clearly have a lot of experience with doing these kind of dynamic angles. Their technical skill in doing it "correctly" is debatable but they know how to make it look interesting which is the first and foremost goal of any drawing

>>6961602
>4chan is basically an open arena
I mean not really, outside /ic/ every other board is really kind to drawfags.

>>6961711
>which kinda ruins the flow of the pose
the pose was worse than the face.

>>6961709
>everything is a "who has the bigger dick" game

>>6961602
There are more crabs than real people at this point.

>>6961545
Guys hear me out..

>>6961545
Why did you group my agreeing about the fix comment together with those seething weebs? Appeal was made. Original face was disgusting.

>>6961545
what is it with constructoids on this fucking board? Do they honestly think hungry clicker is incapable of drawing a real nose? Do they think he just forgot how and had to quickly panic-draw an anime profile at the last minute?

DO THEY NOT UNDERSTAND THE CONCEPT OF CHOICE AND STYLIZATION? WHY IS IT ALWAYS ONE WAY TO DRAW SOMETHING?

please answer me, defend your beliefs, explain yourselves.

>>6962019
I think the original face was cute and had appeal. What now faggot? We clearly think opposite things, where do we go from here?

>>6962020
Why stylize "cute women" only to make it ugly? I can tell it's a fuel for horny idiots even though the author didn't go fully over the edge.(it's pretty tame) Their goal was opposite to what they did to that face.
The fix at least looks like a face and goes along with the intended direction of the image - makes it appealing, not ugly.

>>6962020

>>6962027
>missing the point about stylization
>this is ugly
Art is subjective, goblin. The neck was the most bothersome thing about it.

>>6962027
>the fix is better because it at least looks like a face

if you think hungry clicker's art doesn't look like a face then thats on you for being face blind. You have this odd complex with noses where you think that because he didn't literally draw nostris, that means she doesn't have any. You're stupid on a profound level. The head he drew is also tilted in a different way than the original, the original is just a straight side view because the fixer thought that was correct. They thought this was like a math problem and they just had to write the answer. They think there is one way to draw a side view and they did it, therefore they are the better artist. You are fucking stupid. And I know you won't believe me but someone else reading this will and that's what matters. There are other errors going on but guess what, its not even a problem .The fact that the fixer didn't catch them means hungry clicker got away with them, and that's the WHOLE POINT OF STYLIZATION. TO GET AWAY WITH ERRORS. HE REDLINED THE WRONG THING, SO HE'S WRONG ON TWO LEVEL.

>>6962037
>misses all the points
not even worth another explanation, read my message again until you notice why you didn't write anything remotely dangerous to my points
>nostrils
sure mate

>>6962006
I hear you. Music to moai ears.

>>6962006
Still an improvement to the original

>>6962169
stfu noob

>>6961631
>>6962006
piccazzo

>>6962169
Your points are fundamentally wrong. You think he drew It wrong and you can't comprehend that your idea of appeal is different from someone else's. Not everything is a debate. If you say "this drawing sucks because I shit my pants this morning", there is nothing I can say to even get you to understand art. Just say you don't like it, that's fine. You hate what you think is anime and refuse to understand. Its like if I just hate all 2d art, or all of Picasso's art because he didn't do the Loomis head. I am allowed to hate his art but I still understand his decisions because I draw