/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6957781
shush virgin.

Link to video or we can't discuss this

why is this blanked out. did you grab this off leddit?

>>6957785
https://x.com/waffletimecat/status/1730006811623756092?s=46&t=0BwyRF4kDKLPsbGpSOM1ag

>>6957790
>it looks like shit
kek
2 more weeks right aijeets?

>>6957781
I can literally pinpoint the exact moments that the AI extracted from Hare Hare Yukai

>>6957790
why do people like this? if you didn't know it was AI you'd say it looked fucked up, but saying it's AI lets people overlook flaws because "this is the worst AI will be, it's getting better".
I don't care, I dislike what it looks like right now.

>>6957800
Because no matter how bad or shitty a product is, even a little sex appeal “fixes” or wash away all the flaws.

>>6957815
no it doesn't and the ratio on that post shows the anime community isn't all that impressed either

>>6957828
https://x.com/frozenaesthetic/status/1729604728743444933?s=46&t=0BwyRF4kDKLPsbGpSOM1ag
This 47k likes
Og post has gotten 100k likes

https://x.com/tsunderebutt/status/1726331514890420475?s=46&t=0BwyRF4kDKLPsbGpSOM1ag

>>6957854
I know what I said babe, that's shit numbers for xitter

>more rotoscopy

>"if sex appeal is all it takes..."
>"this is AI but im fapping. Epic and baesd!"
They needed this long to figure this shit out that they do not give a shit as long as it has titties in it.

It's happening, artbrothers, the time has cum.
Everyone will now be anti-porn.

>>6957895
>Everyone will now be anti-porn.
Most of all the government thanks to all this AI shit now. Not going to be surprised if they start hammering down on user created porn on sites as well as getting visa and mastercard to stop doing business with anything porn related

>>6957907
>visa and mastercard to stop doing business with anything porn related
Adult industries are already "hot" for them, because of possible legal repercussions in being charged with enabling human trafficking and cp, but i wouldn't be surprised either, except for ""trusted"" companies.
>if they start hammering down on user created porn
Too much competition. Always was.
>Most of all the government thanks to all this AI shit now
The american govt loves AI so much they created a cpu shortage in china as to not let them get ahead of the AI race.
Wouldn't be surprised if most of the ai shit and shilling is backed by government agencies.
But i mean, no way the american government would flood the internet with ai generated porn to attract mass attention from all ages unto AI so as to get more people and investors into this as to win against another state? No way dude.

>>6957781
Looks like rotoscope slop only praised by someone who doesn't understand animation. Literal anime filter tier over a video of a real woman with thick thighs.

>>6957794
2 more bridgman copies drawlets?

>>6957918
they didn't even remove the back ground changing every frame. it's so fucking lazy

>>6957790
>>6957781
>she isn't even hot
>the animation looks like shit
I've seen more sex appeal in flash animations from 20 years ago than this.

>>6958618
Really takes me back

>>6957790
>Voluptuous anime girl with a blank cheery smile wiggles around with the style and grace of Lanky Kong.
I'm honestly not surprised this is popular. Some people really like cutesy anime hip wiggling.

>>6957790
>Momokun likes AI art
I hate it even more now

>>6957794
>it looks like shit
>>6957795
>I can literally pinpoint the exact moments that the AI extracted from Hare Hare Yukai
>>6957800
>why do people like this? if you didn't know it was AI you'd say it looked fucked up
>>6957890
>rotoscopy
>>6957918
>Looks like rotoscope slop only praised by someone who doesn't understand animation
>>6957949
>they didn't even remove the back ground changing every frame. it's so fucking lazy
>>6958618
>the animation looks like shit
>I've seen more sex appeal in flash animations from 20 years ago than this.

the boogers trailing down my nose have a chokehold on the termites on my face

>>6957923
a life well wasted

isnt it rotoscoped though? ai cant pose for shit

>>6958726
it's like an advanced filter overlayed on a tiktok dance. trash

>>6957781
>>6957800
>>6957828
>>6957854
>>6957815
>>6957889
>>6957895
>>6957918
>>6957949
I hope everyone here realizes how easy it is to convert people. All it takes is for AI to be better than 80% of regular art out there. Not only that, but if it can generate good looking hentai, then it's over. They're officially on board with AI. It gets even worse if you act like the fag in OPs picture.
Morally grandstanding only hurts the cause, but it doesn't matter because the cause is losing ground at every instance anyways; whether you intervene or not.
Moping about job loss does little to help your case. You will be met with derision at every instance, and most will tell you to move on and get a real job.
Your last option(s) are to hope some form of image AI poisoning becomes an actual thing, which is very unlikely as only two types of poisoning exist right now; with one still in development (Nightshade) and the other one being incredibly easy to circumvent (Glaze). Glaze lost before it even started and I wouldn't be surprised if Nightshade turned out to be hot garbage. Or hope that US and EU law manages to stunt the development of AI, which is also very unlikely as Corporations are willing to make AI datacenters to avoid being within any countries jurisdiction.

Case in point, if you plan to make money off of this, it's over. If you don't, then good for you. I hope you can find the time to excel at it.

>>6959546
Kill yourself, falsefla/g/ger.

>>6957781
This should've been the most obvious consequence of AI. Porn commission artists on death row.

>>6959548
What are you gonna do when I'm proven correct? I'm already halfway there? You gonna figure that out or are you just going to call people like me a falseflagger, like I didn't spend half my life learning to draw only for this shit to come out.

>>6957781
I can see AI possibly being disastrous for the animation industry, medium, and it's fans, as companies might only release what is essentially AI filtered live action shit. Say goodbye to art styles like Edd Edd n Eddy or Dexters Lab or Cow & Chicken or Gumball or Johnny Bravo, and say hello to nothing but more realistically proportioned anime-esque art styles.

Oh? Want to have the cartoon character do a whacky and cartoony expression? Sorry, that's not possible in animation, because our human actors can't do that and therefore our shitty AI filter can't pull it off.

Also what is with all these fucking shitty AI threads? Can't you cunts keep it all in one thread?... I say cunts as if there are multiple, it's almost certainly a singular cunt.

>>6959567
you did not if if you have then you have given up so your input is of little interest

>>6959546
Is it ok if I use AI myself?

>>6959575
Just stating reality, give me 1 reason why you wouldn't lose your job to AI that can draw better than you at a quicker pace.

>>6959583
I don't care. I'm just stating facts here. Use it or don't the world will do what it does.

>>6959591
ai doesn't draw, now leave. you clearly have no place here

>>6959572
It’s like how every kids show these days is a bunch of stuff lifeless 3D renders like paw patrol.

I can’t imagine it getting much worse. But I’m sure it won’t get better.

>>6959593
Lol, lmao even. Retarded response as always.

>>6959612
>frog
>no meaningful answer
yep you really need to leave

nature thread

>>6959613
What you gonna do about it buddy? You still haven't answered my question. You gonna go hassle the mods to make the meanie ai man go away?

>>6959617
thing is you're stuck on ground level (assuming you're even coming from a place of genuine concern which your answer puts into doubt) you see short term results and fail to elevate your reasoning by entertaining the deeper implications for art as a whole. assuming you are somewhat genuine (so just a brainlet) why should we care about your questions since you have clearly given up?

>>6959612
AI cannot draw Hitler and Stalin ballin on the moon because those who created it are sensitive People.
My issue with AI is that it can screw minor details when it's professional and it somehow makes me want to vomit just by looking at it.

>>6959624
Okay, explain to me, in the long term, how AI wont slowly diminish job prospects in the art field. I understand that employers aren't just going to fire people left and right because an AI can suddenly replace half their workforce. I also understand that you can't deploy an AI with 0 human input, if you want coherent artwork at least. However, the art field as a whole will be a shell of what it once was. There will be jobs, but the competition will be a lot more fierce. Because of this art schools will probably see drops in tuition, art tutors will probably lose work, and what'll be left is a small subset of people that draw just for fun or have really good connections in the industry. Because people will draw less, AI will be used more often. There, I answered it for you. Now kill yourself faggot.

>>6957790
>>6957795
It's the loli dance meme

>>6957781
If I could give my life to make AI crawl back in the fetid cum encrusted anuses that shifted it on the world, I would do instantly, with the caveat that I get to fuck in the ass with a sandpaper covered wooden board everyone that thought it was a good idea for even one millisecond when they join me in hell

>>6959567
Where are my manners? Kill yourself, please.

>>6959546
You're missing the point.
Most don't convert because of titties, they just tolerate it or pay it no mind on how it was made
Even if children were sacrificed to generate a panel of some girl getting plowed by a horse, it don't matter to most because
>SEX+PEEPEE HARD = GOOD
The huge issue you have in this era is that
>too many consumercattle, kiddies and scammers have unlimited access to the internet, and no restraints or restrictions on interactions
You basically have a bunch of grifters from all over the world and normies+kiddies consuming non-stop because they have to consume and feel hecking valid at the same time by parasocially interacting on social media.

You can still make money off of art, but ai being simply a program with basically stolen assets, lots of grifters and normies not giving a single shit as long as they can gorge themselves on content, leads to shitty outcomes.

If things don't get better and artificial intellifaggots keep pushing it because
>gotta win the rat race
you will start seeing people killing programmers and just pulling the plug on anything connected to the internet which will lead to companies losing huge profits that they will abandon ship pretty fast.

AI is the epitome of the old infinite capitalistic growth meme, it is metaphorically speaking, a cancer.

Also, kill all furries and trannies for good measure.

>>6957781
goats animate my shows?

anyway, Xitter + AI thread so double cancer, report and move on

>>6959639
>There, I answered it for you
nope, you're still ground level, you only see industry
>Now kill yourself faggot.
why? you're the one who's a doomer so more likely to do so. thanks for removing yourself!

>>6959546
let me put it this way: if a robot paints my walls but stains and scrapes my wooden floors as a results is that progress really worth it?

>6959546
>All it takes is for AI to be better than 80% of regular art out there.
It's always hilarious to read techbros talk about art, it's always some reductive sliding scale of goodness that they have in mind when talking about art, like a literal child wowed by a painting because it has saturated colors and a ton of tiny detail crammed in.

>>6959715
They always bring up the stupid banana too.

>>6957781
>your goats who animate the shows and scenes you love are threatened by tech giants

who's going to tell them that they already use 3-d models and CGI for anime and have always done so

>>6959738
Which are still done by humans.

>>6959699
Alright, lets talk about everything outside of the industry. Commission work is going to diminish, porn obviously being the biggest loss, the next one being fan art. That only leaves original commissions or commissions that are so specific and niche that an AI couldn't do, which is dwindling by the day. All of these things I'm mentioning are time sensitive, meaning they'll change as time progresses, and they'll only get better. Maybe you'll get commissions to refine any AI art but again, a ML model could come out next year that is virtually perfect. If you've been paying attention, you'd know just how close we are to that.
Outside of that, there's what... merch, manga/comics, and other miscellaneous bullshit. There's animation as well, but if AI can make pretty pictures, it's not far off from animation. The general point I'm making is that you wont be able to get big off of just making good art in the near future. Those days will be long gone and you'll have to make your art the side-dish to whatever else you try to peddle.

>>6959691
No one is going to kill programmers. Even if an anti-AI uprising started, it would most likely be a minority of people because the majority would feel comfortable with the innovations AI introduced in their lives. More than likely what will happen is you'll get outcast groups that hate technology but these people will never be taken seriously by the greater public. If anything has been proven time and time again, it's that as long as people are comfortable and safe, they'll never care about anything else going on around them. Do you see people sympathize with those "stop-oil" protesters when they glue themselves to a street? No, you just get people who feel more inclined to support oil.

>>6959774
>work work work money money
yawn you're a basic bitch and clueless to boot. but who can't take seriously someone using the "it's over" meme. remove yourself from either the board or life

>>6959774
all my reading is that you're about to rope

wish a nigga would stop talking about animation like they know anything

>>6959546
>>6957854
It really is the end, friends. GOD I'm such a fucking retard for not opening a Patreon in the 2010s I coulda but noooooooooo, I stuck to muh "I'll never sell out" slogan. I deserve the ruin I live in.

>>6959785
>Do you see people sympathize with those "stop-oil" protesters when they glue themselves to a street? No, you just get people who feel more inclined to support oil.
Yeah, because they're also funded by oil companies to be disruptive.


Tech companies are going to overextend because that's always what they do, first its AI on your phone, then it's going to be required internet connection all day to even play games on your phone or go take a shit, then it will be a subscription to even charge your phone and all that shit.
It's not going to be the fringe groups forsaking smartphones and internet, but just your regular ass average joes making some basic math and everyone will start following along.
Of course, the job economy, rents, food, etcetera plays a role and it ain't looking good, chief.
>no one is going to kill programmers
What is a programmer without a job?

The only ones in support of AI are the usual rich snobs and people who think it will give them opportunities to make money.
Look at what happened to nfts and crypto.
So much marketing done and so many tools to make it easy for the normies to use, and what happened, they made a bubble.

>>6959546
It's funny how they keep saying this, but gloss over the fact that these totally epic specific picture shitter models can only be made using works by actual artists. It won't be able to make good superslob hyperscat loliporn unless it is fed enough works of each, preferably ones which feature ALL of that in one image, to make something possible.

>>6960241
>The only ones in support of AI are the usual rich snobs and people who think it will give them opportunities to make money.
>Look at what happened to nfts and crypto.
>So much marketing done and so many tools to make it easy for the normies to use, and what happened, they made a bubble.
The difference here is that AI imagery gives people a tangible benefit. They want a logo for their small business? Just ask AI! Want a poster design? Just ask AI! Company shirt? AI! Their new comic idea, their videogame assets, anime boobs? AI! Website graphics, TV ad imagery, menu photos? AI, AI, AI!
You can explain the moral implications, how it was developed using peoples' art and photos without their explicit consent for that particular usage, how it is being intentionally used to actively undermine the very artists and photographers whose works they used, and publicly they might even say "wow that's really shitty, fucking tech scum" and claim their support of real artists, but behind closed doors they'd rather use an image generator (or I guess pay a proomptjeet $5) to give them something for free (and without the hassle of coordinating rights and usage agreements) instead of paying an artist or photographer.
That is, until you show them how it can be used to generate endless waves of realistic porn using public photos of them and their kids, then they'll actually want something done about it.

>>6960213
What is keeping you from learning how to use these AI and making $$$$ on patreon on a separate account?

>>6960386
The tl;dr is that it's easy to underestimate how fucking cheap the average person and company tends to be, so if AIshit is deemed a "good enough" alternative, it will "win" 90% of the time, especially when you can even use it to try to specifically imitate a particular artist.

>>6960500
Yeah we know, normies will gobble up their cheap goyslop regardless. Ai is coming for them too so they can enjoy the ride while it lasts.

>>6957790
everyone saying it looks like shit makes me lol, that clip is better animated than 99.8% of all shit that has been made up till now you guys are seriously coping

>>6960523
> t. retarded tourist

>>6958618
Wait til u realize art doesn't actually matter and all of you don't deserve to live

>>6960517
In either case, this slop isn't art, so unless your attempt at making it as an artist was to produce slop for consoomers, you won't be losing out on much.

>>6960588
Whoa calm down, did an artist touch your pee pee

>>6960591
artists could have normalized child molestation but noooooooooo they had to take the high road

and that's why i hate them and why the loli community is abandoning them for ai generated simulated cp, you are worthless

>>6960595

>>6960598
sorry i don't get ur stupid movie meme! that's all u ppl know how to do, reference movies!

>>6960386
I know, it's not that i'm not aware of how normies like to gobble up anything if its easy and cheap and gives them the dopamine
I mean, aitards are enough proof of this.
>That is, until you show them how it can be used to generate endless waves of realistic porn using public photos of them and their kids, then they'll actually want something done about it.
Yup.
And then it will be really too late when anyone and their dogs can have image generation at their fingertips.

I say; this AI push really is all based on short-term thinking, because no sane individual would not see the consequences that this will inevitably lead to, which does kind of confirm that this is all a grift.
AI devs are going to get their money, aibros are going to get as much profit as they can until the getting is good, and then when the bubble bursts, everyone else is going to deal with the consequences that this technology entails.

Tbqh, it is going to be fun seeing boomers and other faggots lose their shit because someone generated and is selling t-shirts with similar shit like their own generated shit.
On the other hand, you better not post any pictures of yourself on the internet and never go outside again because people really do not give a single shit what happens to people, except when it happens to them then the world needs to go on pause.

It's weird to see all this bragging from AIfags about how good their technology is but they still haven't made anything note worthy with it and artists are still getting hired every day.
>you don't understand the technology isn't there enough yet, just give me 5 more years then i will make my ai prompt masterpiece and show those artists

yeah okay

>>6960654
Your image is accurate and that pipeline demonstrates that most AIfags are just jealous wannabes who've seethed for years over the attention received by those dirty dang artists.

>>6960676
People just make normal stuff like this, don't expect some Michelangelo level shit from the average dude.

>>6960747

>don't expect some Michelangelo level shit from the average dude

You're implying that one day AI will reach the levels of recognition that Michelangelo has, like there's some sort of "high-level" AI and it it's not all just boring shit like your image

>>6960747
> J-just lower your standards, alright?!

>>6960747
>2022 to 2023
Did that pic take a year or was it longer this tells me jack shit honestly except it took them a year and used more shit
>are those programs free or have cracked versions anon

>>6960793
>>6960812
Not what I said.
>>6960858
It's showing what was possible with the tek of 2022 vs the tek of 2023, it's all free and open source software StableDiffusion + ControlNet.

>>6957781
Sex appeal is all normies want from art. Let the Ai create that for them, it is less exploitatative than the porn industry

>>6960907
My thing about is you'll still have a shit ton groomers still since most that stuff have shifted online anyways.
>only fans accounts go brrr honestly

>>6960878

I'm assuming english isn't your first language but that is what you said. Isn't there some AI out there to help with your english

>>6960747
you can tell it's always the same anon baiting because he purposefully lowers the pics res purposefully so you can't tell it's shit

>>6960958
It's not what I said.
>>6960965
I don't know who you're talking about, but I'm not him.

>>6960676
Yeah, AI isn't really going to do anything. I don't see why other artists are getting so mad at something so inconsequential.
It's like getting mad at a toddler playing with their toys.

>>6960965
Why would lowering the resolution of an image prevent you from telling if it's shit? An image is an image; you can judge it based on its current attributes rather than the attributes of its source.

>>6960747
>t.tripfag

>>6957781

>>6961002
Have you ever spent time around toddlers? They aredemanding and draining to be around and think the world revolves around them. They'll wreck your life and happiness if you don't put them in their place.

>>6961002
I am flattered when somebody references my art.
I am angered when somebody traces my art. I am angered when somebody sues my art for AIshit.

Simple as.

>>6960241
>Yeah, because they're also funded by oil companies to be disruptive.
I knew you'd say that, the reality is that most normies don't know that. This is exactly why corporations exploit peoples' general ignorance. This is the point I'm making. People are malleable to an incredible degree.

>Tech companies are going to overextend because that's always what they do, first its AI on your phone, then it's going to be required internet connection all day to even play games on your phone or go take a shit, then it will be a subscription to even charge your phone and all that shit.
It is already happening and what do most people do? They find workarounds. They don't go full scorched earth like that. That's a ginormous leap in human thinking. Most people will probably turn to alternative forms of tech if it were to truly get that bad before ever forsaking the comforts modern technology provides them.

>What is a programmer without a job?
I hope you know they've been intentionally degrading ChatGPT's ability to create code. It'll be centuries before they phase themselves out.

>The only ones in support of AI are the usual rich snobs and people who think it will give them opportunities to make money.
You must not talk to a lot of people huh? The people that support AI are the ones that benefit from it, yes; but you're greatly misunderstanding just who exactly benefits from it. It's not just rich people or grifters, it's literally most people. >>6960386 explained it for me, so I'll let you read that again.

>Look at what happened to nfts and crypto.
NFTs and Crypto had a very specific use. AI is flexible and cuts down costs.

>>6959797
Sorry, not everyone is a NEET like you. In this world, if you can't figure out a way to make money off of your hobby, you'll never have the time to become a professional. This is why money is such a concern for artists.

>>6961038
This analogy doesn't work because you can just ignore them and they'll starve to death.

>>6961255
>I hope you know they've been intentionally degrading ChatGPT's ability to create code. It'll be centuries before they phase themselves out.
This is not true in the slightest lmao

> It's not just rich people or grifters, it's literally most people.
How much does the average person really benefit from being able to instantly generate some stupid pictures? Free randomized stock photos are not improving anyone's life

>>6961271
>This is not true in the slightest lmao
https://www.popsci.com/technology/chatgpt-human-inaccurate/
https://community.openai.com/t/chat-gpt-4-is-getting-worse-on-content-generating-from-july-2023/308019

Every other form of Machine Learning degrades while Image-based ML is only getting better. The sooner you realize this, the sooner you can stop wasting your time.

>How much does the average person really benefit from being able to instantly generate some stupid pictures? Free randomized stock photos are not improving anyone's life
You didn't read what I linked at all did you?

>>6961281
Degrading free versions and paywalling more functional ai is not the same thing as codefags intentionally sabotaging it to protect their careers. Software devs are getting paid well enough to develop this stuff that they don't care about the long term implications.

>>6961292
You do realize GTP-4 is a paid model right?

>>6957781

Anything ai generate requires something made by human. In this case the anime/fan art it trains on and the video made by a good by human dancer. Not to mention the retarded ai user who unfortunately is part of the human species is needed to copy paste prompts and steal those material from other talented human.

>>6961255
just rope. you are not concerned about art

>>6957781
aren't those anime opening choreographies all rotoscoped anyway?
how is that different from using img2img on a video?

>>6961402
the good ones are referenced, not rotoscoped. shame on you for bumping

>>6957781
Artists truly have a female brain lol, they think people give two fucks about their ideas and personality. Coomers just want to coom, they wait for the moment where you give up and start drawing degeneracy, ai just automated that process
People underestimate the amount of coomers in this world....

>>6961592
and by your post you've proven you're a nodraw fag who just needlessly bumped a thread for extra drama

>>6957781
Its literally img2img rotoscoped garbage from tiktok. Here's the original video.

https://twitter.com/XolotheCholo/status/1726645829849764166

>>6961255
>Most people will probably turn to alternative forms
Anon, it is obvious i didn't make a
>"technology all bad"
statement. But people will most probably go back to older phones without wi-fi and shit to do calls and messages.
>I hope you know they've been intentionally degrading ChatGPT's ability to create code. It'll be centuries before they phase themselves out.
So you'll be paying for gpt5 when it comes out.
Oldest trick in the book.
>The people that support AI are the ones that benefit from it, yes
What did i say?
>it's literally most people
Not everyone is a youtuber running scam channels that needs to generate 5465431 thumbnails and upload 20 videos a day.
Short term benefit doesn't outweigh long term consequences.
>NFTs and Crypto had a very specific use
getting normies to buy crypto by telling them its easy getting rich and its gonna be stable to then sell coins for real money
Basically, pump-and-dump scheme
>AI is flexible and cuts down costs.
Sure, short-term.
But long term it will cost more to run the AI than the money it will generate.

>>6961592
pyw

>>6961402
Rotoscopers still have to draw. Img2img faggots have no standards so they leave it as is.

>>6957790
Unironically impressive. /ic/ is coping hard right now, honestly. It still looks like shit, but a few months ago it couldn't keep consistent on key things like clothing, background, hairstyles etc.

I thought it would take a few years to get more coherent but here we are. Cope will be off the charts when this improves more. It'll still never look like a real animation, but only in the same way that 3D animation will never look like traditional animation. it'll likely just be its own thing that'll look good enough even if a little jarring like a rotoscoped film.

>>6957795
That isn't how this works.

>>6958618
this is the type of anon that color cum yellow

>>6957781
anime waifu coomer bait is all you fags use this shit for.
AI has pretty much exposed how incredibly shallow imaginations are.

>>6957790
it’s so scuffed

>>6958618
SOUL

>>6957781
Everyone will remember Oda, Miura and Miyazaki but absolutely no one will remember degenerate #201381 that draws taste of the month anime girl getting anally fucked. Even before ai no one respected porn artists and i hope that once ai gets more popular a lot of them will stop wasting their potential on producing porn just so a niche community of coomers has something to jack off to. Pic related is from a hentai btw

>>6961687
>Sure, short-term. But long term it will cost more to run the AI than the money it will generate.
Explain.

>>6960355
No shit it needs real art. There's millions, probably billions of human made art out there. Once the ML algorithm is optimized with each iteration it'll be able to make anything made from a millennium ago to now and beyond and it MIGHT become even easier to use in the future. That's the real worry, is the lack of barrier to entry. You're really fucked if that ever happens.

>>6964054
>That's the real worry, is the lack of barrier to entry
You already have AIbros whining whenever some new AI comes out that makes it easier than whatever AI shit they're using. It's hilarious

>>6964105
It was always about THEM being the ones to become the "new artists," the whole "democratizing art" was just the altruistic cover to deflect from how shitty it is to use somebody else's art for your picture shitter.

>>6961898
>he doesnt know about edge analysis.
kek

>>6957790
Wow it looks so good now, I thought it will still look like tiktok AI from 3 months ago

>>6964054
>You're really fucked if that ever happens.
the whole medium is then. complete destruction of the know-how. anime already suffers from that and they didn't need AI for it

>>6961639
Nah, that car is facing the other way.

>>6959635
>AI is that it can screw minor details when it's professional
Well you've described the best use of AI in art, AI can be used for internet creations like memes and web anime (thanks to AI, artists with under 10k followers can create their own anime) because nobody cares about the minor details, while professional drawing can be utilized for tv size anime/movies.
Just like when the camera was invented, artists stopped drawing portraits and invented new art styles.

>>6957781
The only way this dystopia could be worse is if the nazis won during WW2. I hope Nightshade works.

>>6964152
Go back to transwitter.
YWNBAW.

>>6964176
nice try tranny

>6960747
>People just make normal stuff like this,
Lmao

>>6964191
In what moment i said a thing about defending AI, you fucking coal nigger?
You are shitting up this pic in other boards same as the indians spamming these threads, such is the mind of a obsessed tranny like yours.
KYS.

>>6957790
Rotoscope if bad

>>6964191
Transwomen are real women and your daughter lost her sports scholarship to another girl. Fair and Square. Literally the girl was square.

>>6958653
Why did you take time to quote their posts when you have nothing to say? Fucking mongoloid.

>>6957789
yes

>>6957781
>3rd world programmers vs 3rd world doodlers
Lets see how this plays out

>this entire thread
most of you sound like mentally ill potential school shooters
the truth is that the only difference between your average AI grifter and your average commissioncuck is that the latter spent years learning how to draw
jobs have been getting streamlined and automated for a long time now, art is no exception, with all the digital tools and shortcuts available this is exactly where it's been heading. if you have integrity you wouldn't work for someone who would replace everyone with AI anyway

and if this was truly your passion you wouldn't feel so threatened

>>6965761
>if this was truly your passion you wouldn't feel so threatened
People like you live in their own bubble, I work 12 hour shifts in a kitchen and when I get home I'm too tired to have sex even, I loved the idea that one day I might be able to become a full time artist and leave this life behind so of course I feel threatened, how could I not?

>>6966940
That was never going to happen even if AI didn't exist, set a more realistic goal.

>>6966940
your prob already too old to be an influencer and ideas prob are dog shit that even AI can't save you from your shit taste

>>6966940
If you're going to be a full time artist working for a corpo, even without AI it'll drain your soul.
Like the other anon said set a more realistic goal while having a backup plan.
And as an example being a full time artist for an indie game team means you can actually work without fear of AI replacing you, not something one can say about a large company.

>>6966958
>being a full time artist for an indie game
this is great if you are semi-indie(tiny team with big publisher backing)

>>6966962
>tiny team
and surprise surprise: there's going to be a shit ton more of those.
thanks to AI.

>>6966964
and there's going to be a lot more fake indie dev teams lol

>>6966964
I'm already using AI to speed up development. Don't need it for artwork, I'd love it for Retopo and UV shit. come on you fuckers, automate the tedious stuff!

>>6966958

>>6965517

>>6961898

why does it look like her head just literally floating as if it was pasted on

>>6967022

>>6967023

>>6966946
You can see into the future?
>>6966954
Slow down with the projection.
>>6966958
I'm already in the backup plan, also I have friends who want to develop their own games and are thinking about using AI to speed up the process of making art. A good backup plan would be to poison Sam Altman's lunch though.

>>6963332
this

>>6967025
>projection
>believes AI can somehow now let themselves "make it"
>prob still will be too lazy to actually get shit down
I've seen Begs make more worth while stuff, is (YOU) now being an artist just following the latest trends nigga
E-whores with Onlyfans prob still be above ya regardless

>>6967025
>still believes they'll be capable of making anything

>>6957790
>

>>6960747
fuckoff tripfag

>>6961406

>>6967032
>believes AI can somehow now let themselves "make it"
Are you replying to a different post? Did we both have a stroke or something?
>>6967033
Ah yes, my good old crustacean friend.

>>6964152
>The only way this dystopia could be worse is if the nazis won during WW2
/pol/ says otherwise that's this is the worst timeline

>>6967043
are you kitchen anon

>>6966954

>>6966996
.

>>6961281
I swear all these long posts on AI threads are either GPT or tripfag
>>6961255
>Aight reading all that especially on an AI thread

>>6967047
Yes, and I don't think AI will let people "make it", it will only be used by greedy corpos to cut costs. Indies using AI to make money is questionable right now considering how Valve is banning games that are using AI assets, but corpos might be able to train their own models legally with their copyrighted content at some point. And before my art gets noticed in the ocean of AI generated stuff I'll either have to be the next Da Vinci or get real lucky.

>>6960500
I remember when a bunch of people decided sharing this would be a "fun" trend with no knowledge of what it is
>asking corpos to actually keep up with trends or what people actually want

>>6967057
people are already feeling that most corpos are already rehashing stuff anyways. How many more adaptations and remakes there really needs to be.
>even AI training to generate their stuff just gonna loop back the same problem of nothing new actually being made

>>6967057
>before my stuff gets notice
that is an...
>"if"

>>6967027

>>6961271

>>6959612

well you see You're gonna run your body right into the ground
(Right into the ground)

>>6961639
It's far too consistent with the shadows to be img2img. It looks more like https://youtu.be/8PCn5hLKNu4 with pose extraction from the tiktok you linked, but afaik this method hasn't been publicly released so it would have to have been done by someone who has access to the model.

>>6969252

>>6967043

>>6957790
>

>>6969252
>>6969273
>>6969295
>>6969372
bumpers get the rope

>>6963072
rotoscoping is the future, right retard? that's why all animations these days are rotoscoped, it's that easy :)

>>6965761
>and if this was truly your passion you wouldn't feel so threatened
please kill yourself parasite. you're not entitled to make money off of anyone's work even if they do it as a hobby. do you not get the point still?

>>6969398

>>6969372
>

>sun tzu:"know yourself and know your enemy, and you will never be defeated"
>artists:"HUMAN DRAWINGS HAVE SOUL, AND AI IS JUST AN ALGORITHM"
That's why artists will lose the fight, imagine if this is war, their understanding of their enemy is just "enemy is bad, they steal our foods, kill them"

>>6969807

>>6969807
Learn English Rajesh I could hardly understand stand the fuckin point your making

>>6968708
.

>>6969807
But anon how will that help people to properly do tax evasions

>>6966962

>>6969372
<

>>6969807
>(You)

>>6957781
Looks like shit

>>6960500
So anon will mimick an artist that committed war crimes in Bosnia and Herzegovinana

All this and they go for a generic anime look
instead of training a lora on the original NGE
i fucking did this one back in Feburary without a VAE on the old Everything model
I hope AI becomes as illegal as ROMHacking soon
then the jews will go away and the artists will play

>>6969889

>>6969749
this is what mental illness looks like

>>6969889
>hands are solved

>>6969889
>then the jews will go away, the prompters will play and the artists will draw
I fixed your idiotic comment.

>>6957781
>Wow, sex appeal is all al is good for after all.
Yes.

>>6969749
>You're not entitled to make money off of anyone's work even if they do it as a hobby
Lmao buddy, where have you been during the whole capitalism thing? You are actually encouraged to do that.

>>6966940
Why aren't you selling gay furry diaper porn then?
>but i want muh soulful art to be in a movie!
Give up, unless you have a degree and networking that would never happen, regardless of AI.

>>6957795

>>6969983
The "prompters" aren't trying to make a name for themselves with AI stuff

>>6969826

>>6970135
You're right, they're just slapping their patreon link on slopped coom.

>>6969807
Hello sir.

.

>>6970328

>>6970175
Anybody have any idea why every proompter has a Core subscription on deviantart?

>>6970798
it allows them to lock up their entire gallery behind a paywall instantly.

.

>>6964052
Sounds like wishful thinking to me.

>>6957781
>>6957790
Misato does not fucking look like that

>>6957781
I don’t get why people are so freaked out over auto-rotoscoping.

>>6970135

>>6975233
Being told by retards it should replace real art. Retards having freedom of speech is the problem.

>>6969961

>>6967062
>

>>6967076

>>6967062
?

>>6958653
All that greentext just to show jackshit

>>6971358
>Le dot

.

>>6957800
For the same reason people enjoy dogshit art until they learn it was by AI, suddenly they're an expert on everything and have an eagle eye, when they were just blind to all the mistakes moments ago.

simply two sides of the same hypocritical coin.

>>6959546
didn't read your whole wall of text, but you are right, just look at how everyone is cooming over booba edits on a >>>/a/260549530

>>6975713

>>6976747
>thinking boob/porn>>6976747
edits never existed before

>>6975233

.

>>6976767

>>6971358
Another one

>>6976767
and again

>.