/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

that is hardly redline and more of a complete redraw

>>6944463
yeah, being completely honest i highly recommend to anons not do complete redraws and only limit themselves to correcting basic issues from others, first because thank you for your really kind and good intention but your time is worth much more,and i know that is not a very objective reason... but this second
it is; making a complete change doesn't help the begs at all because you basically present them with "the complete owl" (surely all here understand the reference) so, there is no way that cognitively the beg can rationalize in their head how to improve to that, because it's the same as present a new image. The point is to correct as organically as possible in line with the person's own work and style so that the changes are simple but effective for him to notice. The redline should be only core shit so the beg can apply and vinculate in their brains that, because not doing it is the reason why they didn't do it in the first place, in the drawing, and that's why others are making a redline

>>6944460
I'm honored you used my redline for the op even though it wasn't all that good

>>6944467
Sometimes the entire thing needs to be redone though

>>6944521
learn to read

>>6944523
I read and I think it's bullshit

>>6944467
i agree. a lot of the anons should just go to the beg thread.

>>6944532
This is dunning Kruger at it's highest and most obnoxious level
Tracing doesn't preserve forms, wchich means it doesn't preserve foreshortening, in other words, a traced photo can have perspective that looks wrong, it happens often

>>6943691
I attempted a paint-over, i tried to work on what was there instead of drawing it from scratch like that >>6944467 anon suggested, but it's more difficult this way
>>6944467
>your time is worth much more
Im pretty sure people are doing this for fun and/or test their own abilities, it's not a waste of time even if it doesn't help anyone

also why is there no anchor post

Not mine, but I'd like a redline for this pic for reasons.

>>6944798
Thx that's def an improvement. The big arching back on mine was meant to convey a more feral, animal like nature. I can see now the legs I had were way too short as well.

>>6944972
thats possible it just needs to be a different pose,in a deep squat you literally can't completely arch your back

>>6944873
retarded

>>6945485
useless

Could anyone give me some tips or redline this drawing to make her posing and personality more appealing, this was meant to be a ref so thats why I kept it pretty straight but i'd love to make things more life like as well.

>>6945284
It might be missing the connection of her upper body and butt. I would also rotate the back so her head turn makes more sense. Right now it looks like to pictures combined together.

>>6946028
I would make the pose more appealing to give her more personality. From the pose, I would design the shapes a bit more for appeal. You have a good base and an interesting character, but the shapes could use some work.

A lot of the shapes are pretty even on both sides. I would change them up. One side could be straight, and one could be curved.

I kind of rushed it, but I hope it gives you an idea of where to go for the next one. A lot of the personality would come from the pose and face . The design of the outfit will help push the personality you're going for.

need some help here in the right arm

>>6944532
>>6944586
people don't realize that just being a millimeter off is enough to throw off your drawing and make it horrendous looking, especially if you are a millimeter off everywhere, in all directions

People who are good at form can lock their lines in with 100% accuracy

>>6946388

Can someone help me? I’m trying to draw a pic of this girl grinding, but I can’t wrap my mind around the sole of the shoe from this angle. I tried to give as much info as I could from the sole of the foot alone.

>>6946719
I think what you have can work and will look cool. My suggestions are to have the shoe overlap the bar a bit and her hand overlap some of her leg as well. Just to give it some depth.

>>6946685
Many thanks

>>6946739
Great ideas, thank you.

>>6945540
Useless question gets useless answer.

>>6946875
retard

>>6944463
I don't think it's possible to salvage the original pic.

>>6947117
sorry wrong thread, don't redline this

>>6944532
He cannot even trace.

>>6944460

is this thread dead???

>>6945416
That’s good advice, thx.

They are lazier, can someone correct my drawings please?

Which of these two ladies do you prefer? (they have two different arm poses, depending on which is sexier)

>>6947602
/ic/ died since I stopped posting. turns out I wrote 50% of all replies in all threds

>>6946179

This looks amazing, so much more lively and character than what I had before. I'll keep this in mind the next time I try drawing her. Thank you anon.

>>6944460
The shape of this booty can't be right. The gluteus maximus curves in a way that would make the pussy and ass visible.

>>6952441
No, it make sense because of the mass of the glutes and thighs, they're somewhat thicker.
Or you might need to donate to his patreon to unlock the ai picture which has the pussy peeking out

You should rather be noticing how her upper body don't make sense.
I'll redline it later.

>>6952451
To be fair these are 2 different body types. One is normal (canonical petite) while the other one is a phat ass japanese girl - who still has that little curve inward where the glute and thigh meet.

>>6944532
>not bad but i think you really meant to draw a one piece character on the shitter
looks like something id do.

>>6952451
tsubomi?In that position it seems like he has a big ass but in reality he doesn't have an ass.