/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6943964
it's alkemanubis btw

>>6943964
>>6943966
>alkemanubis
gonna guess he's a pedo

>>6943964

Another. Creator: edoya inuhachi
>>6943968
You'd be correct but he's a good artist. a pain in the ass because I can't rec him to normalfags. A lot of loli artists are really fuckin good.

>>6943978
I will admit that I have seen some loli artists who are definitely skilled. I'm sure there are more that I don't know, though I'm not particularly inclined to find them out.

>>6943984
I always really loved Degas's ballerinas. It's difficult reading about how a lot of the dancers weren't really treated well for the poses he painted, but on the other hand, these paintings are pure SOVL.

Oh, and here's an inspiration image:

>>6944045
One more (@kamogi_f)

>>6943964
this thread would probably have more engagement if you use that template where you post your inspiration and personal work side by side

>>6943964
The peak of artistic aesthetics. Everything was down hill from here

>>6943968
Congratulations, it took women 2 posts to bring it up this time instead of 10! A new record!

>>6944248
Agreed. Way more fun like that

>>6944248
>>6945015
I would do that if my work wasn't /beg/shit

>>6944300
I'll try to make it in one next time

>>6944287
artist?

>>6945037
Wataru Yamaguchi

G O R E Y

moralfags begone

>>6943964
yeah i know basic bitch
but this panel made me start wanting to draw imposing scenes like it
its the scale and despair ig

>>6945885
Pedophiles are cringe, especially the ironic one.

>>6946054
retards who can't separate fiction from reality don't belong on the internet. go find a real fight

>>6946041
>yeah i know basic bitch
I would be lying if I said I never let anyone's words or opinions of me affect me negatively, but ultimately who gives a fuck if someone thinks your taste is basic? there's always going to be those who think so and those who don't. especially with something like art, I see no reason why you should give those people more credence than the latter. perhaps if you're trying to "make it" and earn a living off of your art you should take people's tastes into consideration, but otherwise just like and make what you want.

>>6946166
Hasn't stopped me by any measure, I haven't started stylizing yet because I'm a hard /beg/

>>6946242
good to hear. not saying one way or the other is necessarily good, but I'm a /beg/ myself but don't really care about my "style" at this point. once/if I get a decent grasp on the fundamentals then I'll probably start to work on a style.

>>6946089
not him but given enough time, fiction tends to become reality. also, regardless of morality, masturbating to imaginary stuff is kinda weird already, but masturbating to little girls is pathetic.

get a wife, make kids: that's the normal behavior from which most people shouldn't have deviated for fear of terminating the species.

>>6944248
I would do this if both my inspiration and work aren't anime

>>6946286
>not him but given enough time, fiction tends to become reality
not backed by anything and disregard any cathartic effect fictional transgression has. it is satanic panic for d&d-level
>masturbating to little girls
so you're part of those "can't distinguish" types, okay
>get a wife, make kids
how naive
>normal behavior
naive and ignorant of history/socialogy

>>6946333
>not backed by anything and disregard cathartic effect fictional transgression
so, should I wait for you to back up the fact that cathartic effect isn't minor? surely you must have replicable (lol) social studies (lol) on the subject (lol) covering a variety of time frames (lol) like multiple generations.

same goes for the rest of your message btw: you can't ask me to back anything while making ridiculous un-backed claims one after the other.

> so you're part of those "can't distinguish" types, okay
let's assume you're right and that I can't: then most 15yo can't either. and they'll be exposed to your stuff via the Internet. do you see the problem?

>naive and ignorant of history/socialogy
my sides. Confucianism and its influence in East Asia, the animal kingdom at large, strict (historical) enforcement of marriage in the West, etc. but making a family isn't standard? thinking it is being ignorant of history? it's the most fundamental and natural social structure allowing to perpetuate species (read: provide a safe environment for kids to grow until maturity).

yes, there are exceptions, but it's not in contradiction with the idea of *normal* behavior: it's normal/standard, because other behaviors are inconsequential, not because they aren't any other behaviors.

you stroke you dick to what you want; I find you pathetic if I want. I've saw literal chickens being more mature, responsible towards life and courageous than you. your food is wiser than you. isn't that pathetic?

>>6946286
Posting this isn't going to get you a former lolicon husband, hag.

>>6946041
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Rst-fkFVd2g

>>6943964

>>6946683
Mount St Michael, Cornwall - Clarkson Stanfield

>>6946684
https://twitter.com/b66wt

Sergey is probably my favorite artist and has been for several years now. I wish I could attain this level of skill. All his stuff is so cool.

>>6946727
amazing brush economy

after years of extensive art history studies, absolutely unironically this

>>6943964
Really like this dudes knights

>>6946762
I fucking love mony pich. Actually bought a few prints and put them in my office.

>>6946424
Based, go off
Post blog too, based artist must have based art

>>6946424
>you can't ask me to back anything while making ridiculous un-backed claims one after the other.
then don't run your mouth and spout shit as fact?
>let's assume you're right
I am, you conflate drawings and real people.
>most 15yo can't either.
projection of your own mental failing. by your soccer mom logic people would be running around commiting mass murder.
>making a family isn't standard?
you are exceptionally naive about the current state of the world, seeing symptoms as the cause.
>thinking it is being ignorant of history?
no, being a puritanist like you is. as if you were so concerned about family you'd advocate for marriage as soon as fertility is confirmed.
the rest of your rambling is again based on your mental inability to separate fiction and reality and acting like and extracting a moral high ground from it. you are like blue-haired individual chasing their windmills
tldr; lol amerimutt mentality

>>6946799
> t. sadist
keep using hate, insults & straw man in front of logically articulated arguments. how many time were this kind of interactions recorded in history?

>>6946766
not here.

>>6946493
my sides: men are now so weak and fearful of commitment that they automatically associate promoting marriage to women. time to grow some balls dude and to start acting like a household owner, like your forefathers did.

or keep being weak. more chicks for us.

>>6946743
That's a VERY puffy vulva

>>6943964
Here

>>6946743
trans rights are not human rights.

>>6947449
anon, i...

>>6943964
Okay, I have to ask: this artist is obviously ridiculously good. I want to draw like him but I'm also not a nonce. So my question is can you recommend some artists who can draw as well as alkemanubis who aren't pedophiles? Thanks in advance.

>>6947573
What magazine is this? A magazine that publishes comics?

Kabi Nagata

I love Bougureau

I will keep posting Gorey.

>>6947673
I think it's a Collection Croisé zine
The cover was drawn by Apolo Cacho

>>6943968
based degas enjoyer

>>6947851
Same, have you seen any of his paintings in person? Unreal

>>6950236
>>6947851
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=9G8UfISpb0I