/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

Consoomers dont care. Even smart people like Asmongold and Destiny think its best. The only ones that find that questionable are coping artists like yourself.

/thread

>>6921612
stfu bitch ass nigga

>>6921612
Destiny is a literal cuckold. Goes to show you what kinds of people like AIslop

>>6921609
No, art as a product is worthless. People pay for the weird ass psychosocial relationship with the artist.
If there's an artist with no discord, no youtube, no commissions, no artist alley appearances getting money through patreon. It's 90% a laundromat.

If AI or NFTs are involved, it's 100% crime cash.

>even their patreon are uncontrolled imagedumps
I’m starting to think Aifags are literal barely functioning autists

>>6921609
Eh, even if there are some AI guys who are able to cash out at the begining, just like with NFTs, things will peter out. That said, AI is here to stay, it's just the AI bros will realise their grift isn't working and move onto the next thing (hopefully sexbots).

>>6921612
>Destiny think its best
I seem to recall that destiny just found it funny to troll artists by asking "what prompt did you use?", I don't believe he said anything about it being the best, though do prove me wrong.

And who cares what asmongold thinks?

>>6921612
>Even smart people like Asmongold and Destiny
>gay autistic manlet and World of Warcraft player

If it was easy everyone would do it.

>>6921766
hot

>>6921612
>smart people like Asmongold and Destiny

>>6921612
This post tells you everthing you need to know when it comes to this topic.

>>6921612
>smart people like Asmongold and Destiny
HAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAH
Good one anon, I hope you stop being a no personality having virgin before 50.

>>6921612
You ai shitters’ bait is getting more low effort by the day, but not surprised since you’re too lazy to draw

I only saw the head while scrolling the catalog and I could already tell it was AI. How come? Is it the saturation?
When you scroll more the weird perspective gives it away but that was surprisingly quick. Did this happen to anyone else?

>>6921873
It's a perfect circle. It's perfectly shaded, perfectly finished, perfectly normal, the same quality at all points, perfectly has no flaws, perfectly doesnt have lineart, etc.

Normal art is never this consistent, it's the difference between someone drawing a circle and a computer making a perfect circle in photoshop, you pick up on it instantly.

>>6921880
I couldn't see anything about the (lack of) brushwork or line variation from that far, I think part of it must've been the saturation and specially the bizarre Snooki skintone. I couldn't see an actual person picking that colour.
I think oddly enough the telltale sign of AI is lack of internal consistency or any kind of logic, a human being who could draw a passably on-model character wouldn't be that shit at colour or perspective.

>>6921873
the facial expression, ai expressions always look dead and soulless

>>6921880
AI shit is all but perfect, you pseudointellectual retard. Inhuman mistakes aside, it looks like slop because it's a generic pose with an empty expression. Slop is really shit at composition since it was trained on cropped images, and it shows here too. You can try to steal as many styles as you want but it'll always look like generic slop.

>>6921609
There's a scam going about where people on social media will dm you about how they're a struggling girl artist who can barely make ends meet and they'll happily do commission for you.
Back in ye olden days this was tracing, but nowadays it's them just shitting out AI art.
>>6921873
AI art doesn't add anything new to the table, it's pure reproduction. So you can often tell by it looking very generic, and the only way it will not look generic, is if one of the keywords used to make it reffers to something you're unfamiliar with.