/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6855636 #
>>6855624 #
>and somehow it's about me again.
see? complete retards.

>>6855626 #
>So you can call us retarded and delusional for not agreeing with you?
no. i outargue you and THEN i call you retarded. it's not like you're doing the same.
except where are YOUR arguments? it seems to me like they always stop after a bit of challenge from me.

i at least understand the argument and the ad hominems. you idiots can legit not tell one from the other it seems. even going as far as to call it "bad faith arguments" LOL.
those are not my arguments you fucking idiot. those are just me telling you what i think of you.

>Maybe you simply should not try to argue with insults against an argument someone makes.
it's not like i started it. it's you retards that did. you cannot help but go back to the pyw shit. even when i meet you halfway with >>6853036 # >>6852719 #, you just choose to not see it instead.
are those part of the arguments? do you really think that?
i WISH i could just keep to the arguments. but you imbeciles make it damn hard for me to respect anything you say.
go through the entire thread, or any thread i posted in and you'll see that i'm usually the one that is actually trying to have a real discussion.

and besides, again, i did make my arguments along with my insults. i always do.
unless it's about ad hominem shit in the first place, in that case it's never been part of any argument to begin with.

and notice ONCE AGAIN how nobody can continue the discussion after my challenge. the line of
discussion just died again after >>6855597 #
just like it did for that other argument about learning
after a certain point you just refuse to engage with the argument and focus on me instead as if any of that matters.

>>6855668
YOU'LL OWN NOTHING (EVEN SKILLS) AND BE HAPPY

Le ai