/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6839290
It looks AI, ask for progress photos

>>6839290
Are you retarded? It's obviously Ai, denounce it somewhere online like Twitter and destroy that faggots career

>>6839290
£50 for this quality, no hands, no half body, no background and in the end ai processed trash? Where was his critical thinking?

>>6839292
>>6839293
>>6839296
This is what he's just messaged. You'd think with 250k followers you'd be able to trust him and he would care about his reputation

It doesn't look like AI at all. You're getting trolled by faggots.

is this the power of 250k instagram followers

>>6839309
Who cares. They paid 50 british euro for THAT.
I wouldn't say it's 100% ai or not.

It correctly identified 100% of everything I tested in this detector. It is most likely some kind of ai.

>>6839304
Also time argument equals no argument.

>>6839309
it IS AI, trolling nigger

I'll also say that their strategy is often to generate very little to hide as much as they can in a model that has very little details so almost no artifacts are created.
Here you can look at how the face is "rendered" and how it makes no sense in the slightest. Assuming negative colors there is a lot that can seem somewhat reasonable but look at those fire corals in the background and front. They make no sense, like they couldn't decide which they were supposed to be and gone sideways instead of mixing them together. It's a straight up ai.

It's fake.

>I'm experimenting bro, trust me.
>someone paid for this

kekaroo

>>6839290
You dont need more than 2 fingers worth of forehead to tell this is AI, there are too many issues to list them.
Thing is, what is your friend going to do? You can easily set up a list of things wrong and expose the artist as a fraud. Are you two going to put up a fight or just let it slide?

>>6839348
>2 fingers worth of forehead
Forehead isn't worth fingers

>>6839290
Lets burn the scammer.
But be careful because the same name on twitter is of different artist who does something tattoo-alike. Nobody uses instagram anymore.

>>6839364
it's an expression, silly.

>>6839304
>If it was AI, wouldn't have taken so long, right

It's AI. Dumb argument and the
>Right?
makes it blatant he's trying to manipulate the dude into believe his fase narrative

>>6839304
He's a stupid nigger that deserves to be called out

>>6839366
>Let's

This isn't your personal fucking army. Make a public post somewhere to shame them then move around. Feels like half of this thread is samefagging ngl.

How is this thread not a call to brigade someone?

>>6839304
Dump it

>>6839290
>that this is the full size image
that is brutal, 2023 and paying fifty pounds for a 500x500 illustration. even if it weren't AI it would be unprofessional of the artist to work at such a small resolution

>>6839430
Because it's just exposing an artist using IA. You do whatever you want with that information.

THIS THREAD IS FAKE, OP IS A PAJEET LITTERING THE BOARD AND YOU'RE ALL TOOLS

>>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/ >>>/g/

>>6839440
Schizo

>>6839318
This is very helpful thank you

>>6839348
No idea what my friend is doing in terms of public shaming or whatever - but they've opened up a paypal dispute. The instagram account of the artist looks locked down, I do wonder if they've been hacked and some scammer is selling "commissions" to make as much money as possible until they're banned.

>>6839430
not me (op) - just came here for advice - looks like leredditors are having the same issues

Is it butter or margarine? Is it corn syrup or cane sugar?

>>6839290
One of the boobs is like 25% bigger lmao

>>6839290
even if it wasn't obvious AI, you should be mad because it's some blurry compressed thumbnail image

I use AI a lot so I can guarantee this is a very badly used AI, that is to say some dogshit model used to generate at a low resolution without barely an sense of good prompting

>>6839290
so what did he actually commission?
>pop art of a woman tilting her head
?
1. why
2. why from that particular artist (looked up quickly and only saw random shit that's not self made artwork)
3. why spend 50 bucks on if all you want is a generic commission like this?

>>6839430
>This isn't your personal fucking army.
Who again? Learn english before posting.

>>6839491
>very badly used AI
This is the best they could do to cover ai use the most they could without putting in any sort of effort.
Most of them (so far every one) blocked me when I told them they could at least discard failures and use some inpainting to cover the worst mistakes in it.
They don't even hide with not wanting it to look in any sense appealing.

>>6839548
maybe it's a nigerian prince scam type of thing where the scam has to be so obvious it works on the most gullible crowd exclusively and filters out troublesome audiences, idk

or maybe the extra effort isn't worth it

>>6839290
Even if it wasn't AI that looks putrid.

>>6839563
>or maybe the extra effort isn't worth it
I think they are just too resistant to learning because they did make that software not attach ai metadata to the file. They just scam and don't care.

>>6839538
>new fag doesn't know that phrase phrase
Kill yourself

>>6839600
Well that was easy

who delivers a comm in 500x500 jpeg with extreme artifacts? OP has to be baiting

>>6839304
>long-winded explanation
a simple "no" with a screenshot of the image editing software opened would have sufficed

>>6839290
You can tell it's ai at a glance.
Either that or the guy is below beg.
>>6839304
>instagram artist
>250k followers wich are most probably bots
>"yeah bro i just waited i few days and gave you the image, nothing suspect here right"
lmao
IG is scammers paradise and all the big accounts are botted.

>>6839290
Op, if you really can't tell you are legitimately blind. This is one of the most AI looking images I have ever seen.

>>6839290
and how are we supposed to know without seeing his other drawings?

No I'm not going on instagram, post his art here.
No I'm not going to scroll the thread. Reply to this post and I MIGHT look.

>>6839348
>You dont need more than 2 fingers worth of forehead
god i love midwesterners,

>>6839634
this
You have to be retarded to believe all of that is human traffic, just like twitter more than half is automated bots.

>>6839290
The big give away is that the main area of focus (the character) is pretty blurry and fuzzy. AI seems to have trouble making things focused. Also, if you follow the the middle strand of her hair it eventually becomes a line that forms her nose, which looks pig snout-ish (her eyebrow also seems to merge if said strand of hair).

There are so many artists out there who want commissions, who are far too unprofessional and lazy for them.

>>6839290
This the witch hunt thread?

>>6839364
I have about five fingers worth of forehead, because I have a big forehead and small fingers.

>>6840043
>small fingers.
What does that mean?

>>6840372
That's a saying.

>>6839290
50 euro for THIS? Like I'm not even talking about the fact that it's obviously AI(rendering gives it away) like what the hell?

>>6839292
Aigrifters can fake process photos too, all part of the LARP

offer to pay again, but only if you are sent progress photos. if he refuses, then you know.

>>6839538
Neck yourself. Now.