/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6750338
You're only saying that because he is dead, and are looking through nostalgia goggles.

I wish poop was more acceptable in art

>>6750338
No one here could do what Kim Jung Brap did in ten lifetimes. In his own words, drawing was like breathing.

>>6750341
Is he though? I've though gi was a genius for over a decade

>>6750338
>>6750341
>>6750346
Why ic fags allow him to get away with bestiality, scat and coom and give shit to anyone else who work with the same themes?

>>6750365
because he does it tastefully

>captcha: XPTSD

>>6750365
Because everyone else is a seething permaprebeg like you

>>6750365
he does it with skill

>>6750365
>bestiality
The fuck? Post it.

>>6750338
What is she saying?

>>6750395

>>6750395
There's a lot more.

>>6750368
There's nothing tasteful about explosive diarrhea, faggot.

>>6750635
>>6750632
might be cope but it feels different than coom id see on twitter. Feels like he is actually in flow and just straight up drawing first few things that come to his mind effortlessly rather than straight up planning a piece to be masturbated to

>>6750647
That's a whole lot of projecting in multiple directios

>>6750647
so "porn you'd see on twitter", thus not bestiality, is something that is planned and not "in the flow" and that makes it worse than someone having a dog fucking a woman, who is in turn pegging a dog be "the first thing they thought off" in between women fucking tigers?
are you retarded?

>>6750647
probably because it doens't have the hypersexualized figures you'd typically see in coom art

>>6750647
it is totally degenerate and there's no defending that, but what makes it so based is both how unbelievably good he was and how little fucks he had to give
any other popular mainstream artist drawing shit like that would be cancelled to high hell

Faggots will defend any digusting and vile shit as freedom of expression. Fuck that and fuck you. Depravity have no place in Art. It's there but it doesn't have to.

good art regardless of subject matter
when you do something well enough you can excuse the crap.

>>6750338
>POST
>YOUR
>WORK

>>6750395
There's one where a woman is getting fucked by fox/wolf things, at first I was disgusted but the skill is undeniable

>>6750751
>Depravity have no place in Art.
Who is forcing you to look at and ponder said depravity?

>>6750770
>boohooo goy whysomad nooneisforcing you teehee
Fuck off, kike.

>>6750695
>doens't have the hypersexualized figures
For some reason when you draw coom in a realistic manner people get turned off. This is why weebs are addicted to bug eyed big headed big titty broads. However, if this kind of realistic coom style was more popular I think fans of it would be less accepted

>>6750751
Puritan scum btfo

>>6750751
Shouldn't you be holed up in a monastery somewhere?

>>6750772
I like realistic coom though, the balloon proportions never did it for me

I think in the future there's going to be two internets. One full of coom but with less support so full on cyberpunk dystopia where hackers steal old code and set up bootleg versions of today's Internet hubs (Twitter, Reddit, YouTube, Pornhub, etc) and everyone is at risk of malware if they're not Hero Protagonist from Snow Crash; and a clear net that is just a huge corporate network, so think clean YouTube, insta, sanitized results, RealID (comes with the territory, sorry) and so on. Tough call.

>>6750751
>Depravity have no place in Art
yfw art is a depiction of depravity since the very beginning.

JUST SAY PORN YOU INFANTILE ZOOMER FAGGOTS
IT'S THE SAME FUCKING NUMBER OF LETTERS

>>6750816
Probably an enraged landwhale that wants to bring everyone else down with her misery

>>6750647
yesh. thats because its multiple drawings crammed into one page. makes the whole thing look like random doodles. if it was only the tiger fucking it would be "soulless" as the fags here like to say.

>>6750343
but it is
this one sold for 275000 euros

>>6752095
>not female poop
money laundry it seems

>>6750751
Lmao SEETHE bitch

i will never understand how you can just memorize an unrealistic perspective and draw it easily. I have to construct the construction lines before even beginning the sketch.

>>6752135
The "natural" fisheye perspective is surprisingly easy, just draw your immediate surroundings without moving your head or construction and the perspective comes naturally, I think it's some sort of distortion we don't notice, but easily replicate when just drawing line by line in relation to the previous. Try it, start by drawing the paper and pencil, your hands and arms as you see them, then just proceed outward, no construction or anything, just observational drawing.

>>6752171
woah, this is a great tip. It's sometimes easy to mess up the scale of the objects in the scene in relation to others, I need to take it in as a whole more often.