/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6712665
but I thought AI could only do anime

just show the process of creation or the irl painting. if you're making art for other people just bite the bullet and use ai to make art.

>>6712673
it can do everything and in any artstyle or mixed artstyle

When I see this I want to stop learning art it's so beautiful and literally what I told it to do, I told it girls sitting at a festival facing a lake in the night with fireworks going off

Couldn't believe this one was AI at first

>>6712665
That doesn't really look AI.

>>6712689
Because it isn't it's a famous art piece by Zdzislaw Beksinski.

Because of it's surrealism which AI is really good at some might argue that this is AI if they wouldn't know that it was made by an real artist

>>6712689
It does a bit, but also who cares if it's good it's good

>>6712685
>girls
creep

>>6712665
literally who gives a single goddamn fuck WHO CARES WHO CARES WHO CARES ANYONE WHO CARES IS A FUCKING BRAINLET WHO EITHER DOESNT KNOW HOW TO DRAW OR DOESNT KNOW HOW AI WORKS WHO CARES FUCKING MORONS EVERYONE TALKING ABOUT THIS SHIT ITS JUST MORAL PANIC IT DOESNT STOP ANYONE FROM MAKING ART SO MAKE ART WHO CARES YOU FUCKING FAGGGOOOOOOOOOOTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTTSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSSS

>>6712665
Goddammit the Jews!

>>6712683
>it can do everything
I suspect it can't do good tiny pixel art like pic rel

>>6712687
the finger bleeding into the ground or the dismembered arm didn't give it away? Or even the plasticky look of the girls? Even the weird eyelashes or the weird neck? How is the level of observation so low

>>6712734
I can tell that's AI, but generally I don't look at individual elements, I try to look at the whole picture instead.

>>6712703
Based goyslop enjoyer.

>>6712755
what can I say, one can only lie to oneself for so long

>>6712687
Just look at the melting eyes

>>6712685
You've a boring/clinical taste

>>6712703
>if it's good it's good
AI is not good.
OP makes you think what the artist was thinking while making it, ai "surrealism" is just worthless because you know there was no thought process behind it just procedural generation. And just like in games, procedural generation is sold as infinite possibility, but in actuality it's just a boring waste of time.

>>6712799
Art is good if it's good.
I don't need to think of the artists intent. I have thoughts and impressions of the natural world just fine. Separating the art from the artist is good in my opinion.

>>6712737
ew

>>6712882
>Separating the art from the artist is good in my opinion.
not when it comes to the art itself you moron. you don't know what this quote means

>>6712685
>>6712687
>>6712737
I will always be able to tell an AI picture because, for lack of a better word, none of the elements are drawn by the same "hand". The actual artist, that it's mixing, that did the backgrounds, the eyes, the clothes, everything, differs from the others, and until AI can give me that line weight with consistency, I can always tell even if they fix the anatomical problems with it.
Granted, most cumbrains don't have the attention span to look at a picture for its pieces, they just say "Oh that's nice" and keep scrolling

>>6712961
ironic

>>6712964
That's not how it works, most likely what you are experiencing is confirmation bias.

>>6712882
Separating the art from the artist is about discussing an artwork without hanging up about the "problematic" actions or opinions of the artist. It's not about completely separating intention or humanity from a piece.

>>6712983
permabeg eyes lmao

>>6712665
> jews
> AI
Two birds at once. Victim mentality at its finest
> muuh the world anons, its the world's fault :(((

>>6713026
The intent and humanity comes from the observer, the artist is irrelevant. That's how it should be.

>>6713049
That is a very self centered outlook on art and no one was making that argument until bugmen started pushing hard for ai slop to be accepted.

>>6712882
Surrealist art is all about deciphering the artist intent or inspiration. It's literally a puzzle.
AI has no intent. AI surrealism is literal goyslop.

>>6712673
>but I thought AI could only do anime
lmao

>>6713062
That's how I've always seen it.
>>6713067
Can't agree, I really don't care or even want to know the artists intention, whether it's ai or not I impart my own meaning as I observe the piece.

>>6712964
You're retarded. The easiest way to tell how it's AI it's because it's TOO perfect. Even when the AI fuckups up and draw a hand with fused fingers it's still a perfectly shaded bad hand with impeccable lineart.

>>6713067
>AI has no intent. AI surrealism is literal goyslop.
Copium, AI surrealism has intent: the user the input gave it.

>>6713076
>all art is the same
>all strokes are the same
you're the retard here

>>6713093
>ai pictures are art

>>6713125
desu most of people claiming to be artists nowadays don't even produce anything that could be called art, it's just coomer goyslop

AI generated images always look wrong, even when the mistakes don't stand out there's still a horrible uncanny quality to it. Looking at this shit is bad for you.

>>6713152
yeah even normies on facebook art groups are now saying shit "looks like ai" as an insult.

>>6713152
>>6713165
I'm sorry but you sound like ai bugmen falseflaging

>>6712703
That's like saying a forklift is as impressive as a person lifting a half ton. no/

>>6713079
too bad that the user is nothing more than a worthless skill-less nigger

>>6713076
the easiest way to tell is the thumbnail being utter nonsense

we are /aic/ now, aren't we?

>>6713179
If we are discussing lifting heavy things as an art form, then ueah you're right. But if we're talking about lifting heavy stuff as a means to an end (i.e. moving stuff around a warehouse) then the people will go with the forklift everyday than a slower human

>>6713172
>ai bugmen
bugman

>>6713076
Yeah true, I think probably the biggest giveaway in this specific regard is that the background is always there and perfectly made and occupies the entire drawing in consistent quality, I rarely see this in regular art even for extremely pro artists

>>6713294
Art is not a means to an end. Not even entertainment. It's a luxury and mindless mass production inherently lowers it's value.

>>6713323
But anon are you a turk

>>6712683
not really. it has a hard time doing a lot of things (i.e. cross hatching)

>>6713336
Moor than you can imagine.

>>6712799
That thought process was never worth anything, anyway. It was a pretense by which old artists used to sell themselves. And like God, it is being exposed as a total irrelevant fantasy. The dumb shit in your head, the "feeling", personal perspective, whatever it is was never important in finishing your work. It's only the procedure that produced the aesthetic, and that can be imitated.

Your inner world was never meaningful, and the beauty of AI art is how it exposed you all for being frauds. Lying and exaggerating little con artists trying to impress.

>>6713419
>tips fedora

>>6713419
alright but anon but can "AI" do this style

>>6713419
Forgot the pic

its literally just one anon on a seethe campaign for some reason
i think an artist scammed him or some shit at one point and that $20 was his life savings so now he's on a crusade

>Never again can you create something like this without being accused of it being AI
Of course you can. Hypothetical "you", I don't believe the actual you has the skill.

Ban AI threads.

>>6713272
said the "overly talented homo erotica artist" that only required 168 hours to finish a single piece

>>6713076
>>6713329
>it's TOO perfect
>perfectly made
lol, lmao even

>>6713419
>AI shill calling anyone a fraud
Lol

>>6713450
it can have imperfections and look more sketch like, yes

>>6713419
We're human beings who put thought and effort to manifest our inner worlds into the material world. What the fuck are you? An antihuman hedonist who settles for approximations due to lacking an inner voice. Your life devoid of strife is pointless and your death will have no meaning. I request you stop troubling us with your cultist diatribe and accelerate your self-destructive process by finally killing yourself.

>>6713483
>Ban AI threads.
Celebrate AI threads. We need to discuss the new art form. How fast will it improve? Will it make people mad? Can we make it easier to use and faster to generate?

/g/

>>6713419
>It's only the procedure that produced the aesthetic, and that can be imitated.
>you're a worthless fraud!
>...now let me run your work through a program to generate knockoffs of your work
Why are they like this? They so adamantly shit on artists but conveniently ignore that the very works of those artists are needed for their programs to produce anything. I even see this same retarded condescension when an artist dares complain about a picture shitter created directly using their works.

AI beats humans at chess but people still play chess.

>>6713664
aimbot wins games but i still prefer to play legit
i legit don't think these people understand hobbies

>>6713664
If you see art as just a dexterity game or a sport. Personally I think watching speedruns of videogames is pretty boring. Maybe they'll think you're cute and fund your art because they want to fuck you!

>>6713562
Oh look at that you do it free though

>>6713670
women artists can't stop winning bros...

>>6713678
For you guys yeah. Not for my 3d work though ;)

>>6713664
You mean people do things for fun? I don't get it, if you're not getting paid what's the point?

>>6713667
I want all lmaobox users lined up and shot. In 2fort of course.

>>6713696
don't think i've run into a human hacker in a long while. lots of bots though

>>6712665
That's fine, so tired of over-rendered, photoshooped, watered down LE ANIMU WAIFUS, or LE SHOWOFF CONCEPT VIDEO GAME ART, or LE SPOOKY WANNABE BEKSINSKI ATMOSPHERIC LANDSCAPE (p.s. you will never be Beksinski).
AI can have that lane, then maybe artists can go back creating obviously hand-drawn, idiosyncratic art with some grit and soul, that reveals their personality, and tells a story (pic related). Not just LET'S SHIP SOME FANSERVICE COMMISSIONS or LET ME NETWORK INTO BLIZZARD or COOM TO MY WAIFU, UWU bullshit.

>>6713701
nice anatomy faggot, why don't Ashley Wood draw some fingers? And some complain that AI
"doesn't know" how to draw hands

>>6713713
terminal nodraw post lmao

>>6713713
>why don't Ashley Wood draw some fingers?
except he does? but the point isn't whether he can draw hands, was just posting art with blood in its fucking veins (unlike AI and 99% of the art it 'threatens').

>>6713730
I envy people who can draw with pens like this. I'd love to just be able to pick up a pen and paper and draw whatever i see whenever i go out. tradchads are too powerful

>>6713734
I'm a trad Chad but I have succumbed to the speed of Ai

>>6713735
Same. As a fellow trad Chad my customers have all been stolen by AI. I used to make 5000 a month minimum, now i barely scrap by at 500. I've met the AI Artist my customers flock to - he is muscular and swole and his wife was very attractive.... not like the " pajeet" or "tranny" many claim them to be. He showed me his bank account, he makes over 9000 a month. My faith in the ways of old are wavering and now I am thinking about switching to utilizing this AI tool....

>>6713730
Don't worry anon I bet your dad will buy you a 4090 so can too hop in the Ai train

>>6713730
kinda funny how this one seething anon never actually responds to your post

>>6713730
Another one following the feel of the thread now in Zdzislaw Beksinski style

>>6712732
it can do good upscale pixel art though

>>6713751
I'm confused. Is this supposed to look good?

>>6713774
I'm confused. Are you supposed to sound smug?

>>6713774
It's supposed to make you demoralized.

>>6713776
good try I guess

>>6713776
it's over.... i will not redeem....

>>6713775
No, it's a genuine question. Is >>6713751 and >>6713766 supposed to look good? Or even the respective artists they're supposed to emulate?

>>6712698
dumb ESL

>>6713783
Man you don't sound smug. Why don't you draw a good looking hand in comic book style and you tell me how much time it takes and what's a good comic book drawing? Sincerely your anon AAA conceptual artist

>>6713769
It looks like shit, even with the pixel filter you cannot hide the fucked imperfections and artifacts everywhere

>>6713719
Spending even seconds of your life scribbling pictures like your 4 years old
Lol how about NO

AI faggot spending hours and hours of plagiarism will never receive the love normal artists have with a few lines

>>6713799
symbol drawing not even once. Pick up some technical art books faggot.

>>6713730
AI art has more soul than almost any animal generated art. It has all the things you fuckers used to blather about. Asymmetry! Composition! Bla bla bla and it looks BETTER! It draws like Da Vinci, not some commercial comic peddler.

>>6713790
I ask you a simple question and you post a Rob Liefeld pic (who I still consider better than AI, it's not about anatomical accuracy or technical precision, it's about human intention and idiosyncrasy. It's why pic related is better than any AI and always will be.)

>>6713797
terminal nodraw post lmao

>>6713799
Yeah go draw stick figures
Youve got the market cornered for vanity and personality products, you fart huffing faggots.

>>6713804
Yea, because it stole from his artworks
The levels of cope of AI spammers lately is very high. Did another platform filtered you retards from flooding with img2img trash?

>>6713419
>>6713520
>>6713713
>>6713751
>>6713790
>>6713797
>>6713803
>>6713804
>>6713812
why is he so mad?

>>6713806
Idiosyncrasy could be quantized. And art yes I agree should be about intention, but more than that about evocation and to compel. You could do that on Ai. regarding your question I do consider good looking images that could be further improved with traditional techniques. I asked you too a simple question.

>>6713814
Funnily enough I use deviant art as a negative prompt kek.

>>6713816
not enough threads in the board
>>6708986
>>6712758
>>6709516
>>6710976

Something must have happened to AIfags to get them desperate to spam again

>>6713818
Nobody knows what your intention is. That's the fraud of it! Consumers read into art whatever they want. The artists intention never mattered, it was a myth used to deify their profession.

>>6713816
I'm sorry Anon sometimes its hard to dialogue with mentally handicap people. How's my mentally retarded boooi? Awww look at him doing Deviant art.

>>6713824
i don't think anything happened. there's just one anon that's really mad for some reason. of course there are other pajeets, but one is just a ball of pure seethe >>6713828

>>6713827
>artists intention never mattered
continued laughter

>>6713812
Lol mindbroken.

>>6713812
>vanity and personality products
you mean things made by humans. ok.

History of Art.
I. Cave .
II. Ancient .
III. Renaissance.
IV. Expressionism
V. Abstract Expressionism
VI. AI Art.

Get used to it.

>>6713835
Go play Minecraft on your day off if you enjoy "the process" so much. The days of fucking around and getting paid for it are coming to a close. So sorry.

>>6713840
>>6713829
lmao

>>6713827
>deify their profession
What profession faggot? Art is full with inflated egos, the ones that earn money are those that either work for Mafia laundering, doing scams, and or worse working for AAA studios call that movies or games. But guess what... Hollyweird wouldn't hesitate on using Ai, funnily enough Ai art has come to consumer tools like Adobe. Do you truly believe your thoughts against the machine are yours? You sure you didn't fall for the "no to AI meme" astroturfed by the actual greedy corpos like your daddy Adobe? We cannot allow for open source Ai imagery, only my daddy Adobe/Autodesk/ can "steal" from me. You guys are so retarded that even trying to teach you latent spaces that are higher dimensional spaces its a waste of time, as most of you cannot even draw proper 3d what would you know about simpler higher dimensional definitions like quaternions much less latent spaces.

>>6713844
friendly fire pajeet

>>6713747
Anon you're really, really bad at lying.

>>6713844
Schizoposting is also under threat from AI. Chat GPT-4 can generate thought provoking and funny schizoposts indistinguishable from /x/. Your days are numbered.

>>6713847
Fuck you too

>>6713836
>AI art will be a footnote explaining how it fizzled out because the everyday people were getting sick of it, just like crypto and NFTs
Get used to it.

>>6713769
>How to know someone never does pixel art
Someone says that AI is really just a graduate student saying really smart sounding stuff that appears correct, until someone else who actually do know their shit and notices at a glance that the graduate student has no idea what he's talking about.

>>6713849
Corpo Shill, Stop sucking Adobes dick already. What a coincidence that Adobe incorporated now their Ai tool. Fucking faggots glowing for corporations.

>>6713860

>>6713844
>quaternions
"So what happened to quaternions? Their significance was greatly diminished when it was realised that the quaternion algebra was only a particular algebra of complex 2×2 matrices."

>>6713840
I don't play video games and have a manual labor job, quit projecting /g/tard.

>>6713862
>Their significance was greatly diminished
Diminishing the importance of the higher dimensional chad 4d sphere. As Anon could only see matrices.

>>6713836
>pa/g/eet puts "AI" as having its own era for art
>not even photography is in that era list they made
>not even 3d or digital mentioned
>get used to it they say ignoring everything available already before "AI"
Hhhmmmmmmm

>>6713899
Good point. AI and 3d and photography will be in the advanced tool art era.

>>6713905
aight but anon where's the phone filters era at
>will you be adding vine and ticktock to those as well

>>6712665
>>6712673
>>6712683
if it can create everything, it can create nothing. only god can create anything

Not gonna lie folks, the kike demoralization method sure works in regards to art.

>>6713925
Your profile record has a new transaction update.

>>6713931
your butthole record has a new semen transaction update (from me)

>>6713958
semen that was transacted from penis (my penis)>mouth(your mouth)>to anus (his anus)

>>6713982
your anus (his anus) was just ejaculated in (my semen)>into( his anus)his anus from my penis> ( penis)

>>6714104
real?

>>6712665
>Never again can you create something like this without being accused of it being Poser

>>6713074
>Artists will use AI to bash together images so they have a new art piece every day to post on social media for the algorithm.
Ho Lee

>>6713074
Looks like shit

The style is saturating the market.
If peoples gut reaction is to ask if your work is ai, time to either not give a shit or change your art style.

If your art gets flagged as ai with filters that automatically tag it on every platform (Inc soon) then lmao

>>6713074
When I saw the prompt "a beautiful girl with hair flying in the wind" I kept watching because I'm planning an animation with flowing hair, and I figured "hey, maybe AI can be good for something."
The I saw the results of "hair flying in the wind." lmao

>>6714326
That webm is from a year ago, AI-assisted animation has improved a lot since then.

>>6712882
>Art is good if it's good.
So AI "art" can never be good

>>6713769
Retarded /v/irgin

>>6713790
doesn't look anything like the example in the right, Liefeld was just referencing this Schwarzie pic and the shield placement made it look way worse than ir should be

>>6714364
It can be, if it's good.

>>6714389
>my mass-produced bootleg trash is just as good and valid as the real thing it's trying to ape
Keep telling yourself that

>>6714400
Missing the point, I think all of that is irrelevant.

>>6714369
Liefeldsisters, we have been redeemed!

>>6713419
>Lying and exaggerating little con artists trying to impress
There seems to be a misunderstanding here, the experience of the inner world manifesting on art is 100% real and tangible, the fact that you only see it as a consumer product is simply societal conditioning and has nothing to do with the reality of the brain and art.
You're only solidifying my opinion that ai shills just can't see and won't ever be able to see how blind you are to this little corner of reality.
The procedure can't be imitated because it needs the already aesthetically crafted images for it to produce anything other than stock images, so no, art, even in the era of ai, still has its origins and fundamental essence on the human mind and I'm truly sorry that you can't perceive it, it really must be miserable to look at the world through your eyes.

>>6715230
Could it be that you're blind to something the AI people are aware of? I wonder.

>>6715230
Just don't feed the troll. That's the only way to stop them. Starve them.

>>6715230
I stopped arguing with these retards long ago. It's obvious they have no concept of what art is.

>>6715261
Its a matter of perspective, you see... to me you are the troll

>>6716566
>something something the jedi are evil

>>6712732
Those fucking suck, though.

>>6716566
Yet, I'm not systematically shilling against AI. But you guys have been polluting the board for months (years!), and the discussions are the same all the time, the same arguments rehashed over and over and over.

I'm just encouraging people to let it die already. It's been pointless for a while now.

>>6716593
It can't die as long as people are curious and want to discuss it, so my best advice to you is to just ignore it.

>>6716612
> my best advice to you is to just ignore it.
Isn't it *exactly* what I was suggesting the other anon to do, eh.

So blind.

>>6716582
I hate you!

>>6716652
I don't know, maybe take your own advice?

>>6716679
> muh you say ama troll and I am butthurted hard :-((((((
Grow the hell up for crying out loud. You're behaving like a thirteen year old boy.

>>6713751
No artist is jealous of your prompts. None of us feel inferior to you. You're not even an artist, not creative, just a comissioner who tries to delude himself and others that he's an artist. Remember this bugman; you are a parasite. You are not our peers and your so called "creativity" is not a threat to us.
No matter how much you cry and rage you will never be an artist. This is the truth and deep down you know it. Maybe that's why you hate us so much.

>>6716760
That wasn't me, you really should take your own advice though.

>>6716842
Calm down, this can't be healthy.

>>6716593
You see. To me you are pointless

>>6716653
But I love Ic. It’s kinda funny see these autists all triggered over technicalities

>>6716760
Said the triggered 14 years old

>>6716593
Drama queen

>>6716892
You were my brother anon-kun!

>>6715259
Nah, not in matters concerning art.
People shilling for ai are rarely even "ai people" they're usually nobodies with office jobs and no talents that do not give anything more than 30 seconds of thought. That and socially inept tech nerds who are desperate enough to use ai chatbots as a replacement for real interaction, however crude that may be.
So no, I'm pretty confident in my position, any relevant position coming from the other side is about ai development in general, which is a different beast entirely to art generators.

>>6712665
Nigger what the fuck do Jews have to do with this as well?
You fags accuse them of everything

>>6716946
Think lightly of yourself and deeply of the world.

>>6716953
I do, and then I have the confidence to hold those thoughts in higher value than those clearly less developed.

>>6716954
Keep thinking.

>>6716957
Yeah sure man I will

>>6716957
You clearly don't anymore, huh?

>>6712665
Or you can just paint it on a canvas like a REAL artist.

>>6712687
Thank you sir

>>6713075
>Can't agree, I really don't care or even want to know the artists intention
This is why no one will ever remember your name.

>>6717519
Good.

>>6713814
>stole
>it's okay when riot does it
>it's okay when GW does
>it's okay when I call it a homage
>NOOOOOOOOOOOO HE PUT DAEDRIC STYLE IN THE PROMPT SOMEBODY ALERT TODD HOWARD
AI is very good with being derivative in its creations compared to actual companies or even individual artists. Let's not pretend alot of creations aren't just an existing IP with an extra arm attached.

>>6713823
you loss honestly, it makes some cute stuff

>>6712665
is it no surprise that the biggest pushers of AI nearly all seem to have a genetic Indian backgroud? whats the deal there?
literally every race of people I've dealt with since the news hit has been pretty unhappy with what has occurred but the most vocally supportive people have nearly always had some kind of Indian background, and I fucking don't know why.

>>6717548
At the end of the day, Hiroya Oku plays around with LoRAs now and will retweet Gantz AI made by fans. That's more neat than these gay little purity spiraling threads on /ic/

>>6717573
mindbroken by western civilization

>>6717573
Silicon Valley is ruled by the Brahmin

>>6717579
but 'why' though. not even Afroheads, sand monkeys, spics, rednecks, slant eyes or thirdies of every corner in the world seem content with this shit. there's very little of them that are happy with this AI art shit but its nearly always some Indian thinking its a "good thing" somehow.

is it purely because its revenge on the West or is it some subliminal shit deep in their unconscious that goes back even further?

>>6717585
normalfags literally do not comprehend anything unethical with ai art unless an artist tells them. indians just dont care either way.

>>6717585
really? i don't interact much with thirdies thankfully but they seem like the type to gobble this stuff up. though i can see spics being an exception, they have been influenced by asian genes via dragonball

>>6717588
>normalfags literally do not comprehend anything unethical with ai art

that is legitimately not true.
they see whats happening in the corporate environment, outsourcing and kiosks taking their cashier friends and are pretty pissed to see similar shit happening in the arts too.
you get to talking to them face to face and after a while they show some level of concern by what is happening. they're not all soulless like the msm want the fringe communities to believe in.

>>6717588
>>6717591
You two done making out yet?

>>6717591
> i don't interact much with thirdies thankfully
you're missing out on some good convo's my man. you take the good with the bad in this day and age.

>>6717588
AI does make normalfags uneasy desu
the average person left or right doesn't trust any big corpo and feels like they are out to get them. whenever you see some shit about an advancement in AI they're always complaining about how "they" are trying to maximize profit by getting rid of the need for people or something like that.

also
>pajeet is a pedo
lmao

>>6717592
yeah, but that's just corpo, which everybody hates by default. a lot normalfags will still unwittingly consume streetside aislop without making the bigger connection.

>>6717601
>a lot normalfags will still unwittingly consume streetside aislop

that's usually because in the brains of normalfags, the knowledge comes to them from purely consuming. a lot of them 'know' its bad but like an addict on junk food, put up with it and try to absorb it to understand 'why' its bad and 'why' its good. the connection comes a lot later but even then, most are willing to talk about it if you're willing to think on their level.
and a lot of them aren't happy with it. tell them about drawing and painting and then AI art and they get completely dumbfounded. they'll still consume ofc but not in the same manner as before.

>>6717599
>you're missing out on some good convo's my man
i don't doubt it. interactions with them seem to either be extremely amusing or endlessly frustrating. maybe one of these days i'll smuggle a mexican across the border

>>6717600
The cultural climate in the west did an instant 180 towards privacy and stranger danger after all it took for lifelog to get accepted was rebrand as Facebook. After that the masses were ready to self-doxx and later shove phones in people's faces. You think the corona lockdown cattle are gonna make a peep or pretend it matters even if they do? I thought artists were supposed to have a sense of perspective har har.

>>6712665
AI consumers are the most lost souls imaginable. No human connection, they use AI not just to replace artwork, but also friendship, romance, the sage wisdom of an elder. Unimaginably sad to think about.
>>6712685
You’re spearheading your own spiritual demise, keep your social poison to yourself.

>>6717573
There're many indians and they're very tech forward, so yeah it's no surprise.

>>6717609

>>6717617
that's obvious even at a glance into the tech world. what i dont understand is that the concept of ethics through the technology is a completely alien concept to the majority of them.
its like they feel justified stripping the life out of both the technology and the people that use it. its fucking psychotic.

>>6717613
>No human connection, they use AI not just to replace artwork, but also friendship, romance, the sage wisdom of an elder. Unimaginably sad to think about.
Yes welcome to modernity before AI. Hope that your rosy anime slice of life scenario will be more attainable in a post-human world.

>>6717613
>>6717624
You anons have got me wondering what the future is going to be like. With the rise of the internet and smartphones we saw the importance of in-person interactions and local communities decline a decent amount, and the devaluation of individuals that started with industrialization continued. I imagine advanced AI will further accelerate that pattern. Is a future where people aren't actually needed for anything a good thing or a bad thing?

>>6717623
It's a complicated question. Indian civilization is very ancient, at least 5000 years old, yet giant technological advancements and population growth have happened in a very short period of time.

>>6717624
>having a relationship with your parents, a significant other, or genuine friendship is a “rosy anime slice of life scenario”
Like I said; you’re so fucking lost and you have no idea how lost that is.
I won’t even be smug about the fact that my parents are still alive, I have a girlfriend and half a dozen decade-long friendships; those things are blessings that do not last forever. That’s the point.
We’re mortal, we don’t get to keep anything when it comes to human relationships. It makes being present for what good things we DO have in life all the more important. Trying to replace humans with AI is just spitting on the face of life itself, if that’s how you’re going to be you might as well overdose and get it over with.

>>6717632
It’s a good thing if you don’t care about the species. Humanity dies a hedonic death, yaaaaayyy.
Fuck, you’d have to be unbelievably stupid and easy to please if an AI can keep you entertained your whole life.

>>6717635
An AI wrote this response.

>>6717639
based

>>6717639
Why are you bothering with AIggers?
It's like trying to teach a gnat how to speak English. They're all literal drones.

>>6712665
Just draw what you want. No wells are poisoned. AI art is slop meant for the jew cattle and their enslaved. Real art is meant for whites/humans.
>>6712687
All AI art is just a filter over someones already finished piece. Show the artist and your tags.

>>6712665
Just draw whatever the fuck you want, if anything take some pictures of the process to reassure people that you made it yourself, but stop caring about AI fags and for the love of god stop posting AI shit threads here. Have fun making art.

>>6717688
>for the love of god stop posting AI shit threads here.
As you post this, another AI shit thread is created.
You're crying into the void, the mods dont give a fuck about AI shit baits on the board

I just draw like the birds are compelled to fly or the seals to swimming: I just draw because my brain tells me and I don't care about the AI or any other thing.
Every time I leave my home and I see the world around I have the urge or sketch interesting things, so... I don't even remember that AI exist 99,99% of my time.
I just need goddamn sketch everything! I'm addicted.

>>6712687
that's because your curry addled brain can't comprehend humanity

>>6717785
people butthurt cause Pajeet can afford a couple of 4090's

>>6717639
All those things can't withstand the power of the almighty BBC.

>>6717785
>muh humanity
https://youtu.be/9gIMZ0WyY88

>>6717574
it is devoid of personality

>>6713799
>tfw I've made more cash out of a doodle I uploaded to redbubble than by taking 6-14 $100 comms a month
You never know what the normiesphere Will fall in love with.

I've accepted fate. AI art is here, there is no putting the genie back in the bottle.

I'm going to start pivoting my commission model to offer fixing up AI generated images at low cost.
I figure, with the prompt "engineers" pumping out 100s of images and no ability to effectively edit them, there are many that they would like to keep but have to throw out.

That's where I could come in and fix the extra fingers or weird eyes. Shouldn't take too long so it could be a fairly cheap service, or I could work in bulk (send me 10 at a time etc) still thinking about the details.
I truly am just a brush-monkey now. And there's nothing wrong with that.

>>6719875
>I've accepted fate. AI art is here, there is no putting the genie back in the bottle.
Nobody cares. Really. AI discourse has been so rehashed, it's almost pure noise now. Only coomers and lazy asses care.

>>6719964
>Only coomers and lazy asses care.
You forget about companies who will never hire an artist again, they are pretty pumped about it too

.

..

...

...

....

.....

The fact that this post has been up for days and no one pointed out that it is a gondola edit makes me realize there is just no hope for this board

>>6720034
Well anon, who cares it's an "AI" thread. It's already pointless for discussion or putting any higher thought to it

..,

>>6720039
>It's already pointless for discussion or putting any higher thought to it
Why? I think /ic/ could benefit from having thoughtful discussions about AI.
Refusing to learn anything about your worst enemy seems counterproductive.

>>6720069
>thoughtful discussions
>make near a new thread everyday past year
Will you be telling me your a "newfag" as well

.,.,.

.,.,.,.,

.,.,,,,.,.

.,,.

.......

>>6720071
>>make near a new thread everyday past year
That doesn't mean anything. There's a ton of threads being made discussing more or less the same art concepts everyday.
Why can't you do the same for something that might have big ramifications for the entire art world?

....,,...

>6720084
Neat
>though this thread hasn't reach bump limit and y'all already made a new one
>also can't stand criticism you need to make a dedicated self patting thread after every btfo

.........

>>6720089
I haven't been making new threads. I simply post in any thread that catches my interest.
>also can't stand criticism you need to make a dedicated self patting thread after every btfo
This is not me. You are mistaken.

>>6720093
>threads that catch your interest
>every time I see your chatGPT reply post it's on an "AI"
Hmmmm

>>6720100
What are you trying to imply here, anon? Please elaborate.

..........

>6720104
absolutely nothing but keep bumping this retarded thread. Obv this discussion is truly meaningful to have

...........

>>6720111
Why are you being so rude? I just want to have a productive discussion on AI and its effects on the world of art.
Won't you indulge me with a proper argument?

>>6720115
>proper argument
>still chatGPT reply
>literally made another thread seconds later

..............

>>6720121
>literally made another thread seconds later
I haven't done this. Why are you accusing me of doing things I'm not doing?
I just want to talk about AI in the threads that are present. I have no interest in making new threads.

>6720125
>come back later then jn a year
>no one comes to these threads to discuss

>>6720127
>no one comes to these threads to discuss
Why not? It seems like there's lots of potential things to discuss.

...............

>6720128
>plenty of things to discuss gives none
>truly meaningful

................

>>6720133
A discussion is a cooperative effort, anon. Surely, you don't expect me to discuss things by myself?

>6720135
well I expect you to be a dumbass by yourself if you keep replying in this thread

,........,

>>6720138
Well, that's rude and uncalled for. Why does replying in this thread entitle me to such a disrespectful remark? Aren't you posting in this thread too?

Well anon did you type this in the next thread over or just associate with people like this

..........

..........,,........

>>6720143
No, I have no particular associations with any group.

>6720148
only a minute apart my nigga

...,...........,....

.,,.,,.

>>6720152
Well, anon, I don't know what to say; but those posts are not mine.
We are nearly 30 posts away from the bump limit! Your hard work is soon to pay off, anon. Are you excited?

>>6720152
>i cant wait for the robot overlords to take over

,,,,,,,,

>general grievances over AI replacing art thread
>just about average overall
>anon asks why are Indians pushing it so hard
>thread gets botspammed to bump limit

hmmm

>6720159
>6720160
Discord fagging then how shocking

>>6720165
i'd take discord troons talking about art and ai over curryniggers like you hijacking the art scene entirely with your toilet-trained AI shitting all over it.

>>6720162
Aight my nigga but this thread already a week old and curry nigga wants to keep bumping it so. I guess its time to bump it to the ground

>>6712665
>The jews have poisoned yet another well
It's funny you mentioned that

>>6720170
I'm just here to kill a thread for some reason they seem mad about it

>>6720174
Oh shit what up my negro I was just in that thread lmao

,,,,,...,,,,

>>6720179
KEK good shit. Who's the guy in the background?

..........

>>6720185
The man, the myth, the poop-shitter himself.

>>6720174
holy fuck

are indian jews a thing?

>>6720189
>Indian
>British
>AI Shitter
>Oxford Trained

who are we supposed to be pointing the finger at here

>>6720195
Well it's more like their societal structure gives some of them real hard for their caste system

>>6720199
>indian jews can use their monetary skills under the excuse of the country's caste system

that sounds fucking horrifying. jesus.. i feel kind of bad for the poor bastards that end up born there. no wonder so many of them are living in England.

>>6720201
Basically they follow the TND meme as an way of governance

>>6720231
uhhh..tnd? im not sure i understand what you're saying. can you elaborate what that means in this context?

>>6720238
Basically this copypasta but replace niggers with any indian lower caste

Kill niggers. Behead niggers. Roundhouse kick a nigger into the concrete. Slam dunk a nigger baby into the trashcan. Crucify filthy blacks

>>6712687
Soul

>>6720254
>t.samefag
>literally responds to week old post just to bump

.
,
.

.
.

.

.

,
,

'
,

,
.
,

based bumper
i'll join you next time

>>6712665
This is such an ironic post. You only have yourselves to blame for separating one form of illustration from another and giving it a nasty bias. AI art is cool and should be celebrated but you're mad about it and a poltard.

>>6719970
> Nobody cares. Really. AI discourse has been so rehashed, it's almost pure noise now
Just don't.

>>6720857
I think the "pure noise" might be AI owing you a little rent

AI loves you.

glad AI shart is dying

>>6721055
It's getting more popular.

>>6721055
I am publicly outspoken about it but have incorporated it into my workflow

Sorry /ic/, there's nothing you can do about it :)

>>6712683
It can't do graffiti art. It's too complicated for it.

It can only do basic shit like anime girls.

>>6720865
> feeble bitterness
I'm 100% trad. Couldn't care less. Actually happy to see AI disrupting coomers and lazzy asses, as I've already alluded too. But you were too busy being bitter, okay.

Just grow the heck up. Say nothing or something of value, but you'd better stop with those feeble attempts. That's literally women fighting technique.

>>6721712
trying wayyy too hard

>>6721835
>Say nothing or something of value, but you'd better stop with those feeble attempts. That's literally women fighting technique.
It seems you're "category 3".

> There are three classes of people: those who see, those who see when they are shown, those who do not see. (Leonardo)

>>6721946
way, way too hard