[ 3 / biz / cgl / ck / diy / fa / ic / jp / lit / sci / vr / vt ] [ index / top / reports ] [ become a patron ] [ status ]
2023-11: Warosu is now out of extended maintenance.

/ic/ - Artwork/Critique


View post   

File: 423 KB, 540x933, 1686431907210.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6695725 No.6695725 [Reply] [Original]

Why is classical art so fucking gay?

>> No.6695736

>>6695725
Because the artists were gay.

>> No.6695738

>>6695725
Is he wearing denim? In the 1800s?

>> No.6695746

Mostly the french

>> No.6695972

>>6695738
Strauss opened his wholesale business as Levi Strauss & Co. and imported fine dry goods from his brothers in New York, including clothing, bedding, combs, purses, and handkerchiefs. He made tents and later jeans while he lived with Fanny's growing family.[13] Jacob W. Davis was one of his customers and the inventor of riveted denim pants, and in 1871,[14] he went into business with Strauss to produce blue jeans. The two men patented the new style of work pants in 1873.[15]

>> No.6695976

>>6695725
(You) see it as gay. Maybe you should talk about that with your shrink

>> No.6695978

>>6695972
By the 17th century, jean was a crucial textile for working-class people in Northern Italy. This is seen in a series of genre paintings from around the 17th century attributed to an artist now nicknamed The Master of the Blue Jeans.[6]:10 The ten paintings depict impoverished scenes with lower-class figures wearing a fabric that looks like denim. The fabric would have been Genoese jean, which was cheaper. Genre painting came to prominence in late 16th century, and the non-nobility subject matter in all ten paintings places them among others that portray similar scenes.[9]

>> No.6695980

>>6695976
>your shrink
sorry, meant your *twink

>> No.6695983

>>6695738
when you think about it 1776 wasn’t that long ago

>> No.6696166

>>6695738
Eastern Euro bros...

>> No.6696230

>>6695725
19th or 20th century paintings are not "classical" anon, and this person was of the naturalist school.

>> No.6696387

>>6695725
every painting of male body is gay, every naked male sculpture is gay, everything is always about sex

>> No.6696413

>>6695725
Dudes rock.
Quit bein' a fag.

>> No.6696422

>>6695725
back when it was made gay meant happy still.

>> No.6697130

>>6695725
>classical
>19th century

>> No.6697144

>>6695725
>paint a man
>now everything thinks you're gay
fuck these 21st century fucks sexualizing everything

>> No.6697171

Hot and good taste

>> No.6700119

>>6699999
>>6700000
>>6700001

>> No.6700163
File: 1.06 MB, 500x375, 0fd7e652ad66bc31702a1b498368021b-3998676564.gif [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6700163

>>6695725
it's not, you are seeing it from your own perspective.
These days only thing people think of is sex because it gives them semblance of the internal power process through surrogate activities.
The gay is in you, not in the art you faggot.

>> No.6700185

I want to lick his belly and kiss from his chest down to his dick

>> No.6701134

>>6697130
>>6696230
some people will never learn. we have teachers calling themselves classical while mostly lauding 19th century french artists and modeling their curriculum on how they believe those artists learned. many are even more obsessed with realism to photographic level.

>> No.6701150

>>6697130
neoclassical is still classic

>> No.6701152

>>6700119
Holy trinity

>> No.6702039

You have deranged puritan brain or degenerate coombrain depending where n which side of the horseshoe you land on and see any naked form as inherently sexual.

>> No.6702464
File: 322 KB, 523x1000, Michelangelo-David.jpg [View same] [iqdb] [saucenao] [google]
6702464

>>6695725
what's gay about it?

>> No.6703365

>>6700185
same

>> No.6703581

>>6702464
Even their foreign contemporaries thought the renaissance artists were gay. In many countries at the time "Florentine" was used as a euphemism for gay.

>> No.6703640

>>6703581
> t. Platonic lovers = Mr Pocky lovers
> t. Gay needing validation