/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

source?

>>6673965
https://www.pixiv.net/info.php?id=9554

>>6673951
It’s the future of trash cans.

Le

>>6673969
AIsisters wtf

>>6673951
To boost their own popularity, AI niggers constantly send and accept low price requests. It jam the site.

AIsisters... how will I afford my new dilator now... this was supposed to be for us disabled transfolx... fucking chuds ruining something else

calling it: they are getting banned off the website next, or put into a containment chamber,

the japs were always backward race
they missed out on the pc
they missed out on the smartphone
they missed out on the ev and batteries
and now they will miss out on ai

>>6676934
no one wants your photobashing algorithm rakesh, it's about time you realized that. tick-tock.

>>6673951
First they ignore you
Then they laugh at you
Then they fight you (AI chads, we are here)
Then you win.

5 years from now people will be like:
"Remember how some people used to be against AI art? Now it's literally everything creative!"

look at all those chinks mad that they cant scam people anymore

>>6676945
Imagine having your self worth rooted in parasitic AI tech and thinking your teat suckling is worthy of praise. Sad.

>>6676947
and you will still not be an artist, lol.

>>6676945
Except AI art is not copyrightable, pretty much declared from the get-go.

>>6676954
luddite

>>6676955
so? this is a good thing

>>6676956
npc

>>6676956
bugman

>>6676957
Oh, I wasn't disagreeing with you, mind.

>>6676945
>>6676947
>>6676956
LMAO cry more parasites. Bet you gonna start cope spamming your usual npc chanting again don't you? What's is it now? Luddite?Inkcel?Two more weeks?

>>6676956
didnt took more than 20 replies for the
>luddite
lmao

>>6676976
>hahaha he called luddites luddites, can you believe it?

>>6676979
>have to agree with every single technological development no matter what it is, ever, or you're a luddite

Anon, I...

>6676934
>6676947
>6676956
>6676957
WEAK

>>6676979
hows your crypto wallet going techbro?

>>6676947
AI tools will be used in the future to make work faster. They have been used since the 90's.

But you will no longer be allowed to shit twenty million derivative proomturds and charge for it.

Techie scams are only profitable until they become mainstream, the second normies acknowledge they exist it's too late to get in.

>>6676956
There he goes again

>>6676934
>the japs were always backward race
yet they have the most aesthetic culture on the planet. proof that "cutting edge" tech has nothing to do with beauty and art.

>>6676934
>3 months ago
>haha eat shit drawslaves even japs are embracing it look at pixiv!!
>now
>fucking backwards japs eating food with chopsticks and shieeeeeet!!

the label ai nigger isn't unearned lmao

>>6677104
>tiny cramped space with disgusting neon lighting
>muh le ashcetick
pic related is (You)

>>6676956
>>6676979
>>6676980
https://www.businessinsider.com/jpmorgan-chase-employees-describe-fear-mass-workplace-data-surveillance-wadu-2022-5
Being against this makes you a luddite, apparently.

>>6676934
The smartphone has singlehandedly destroyed any prospects humanity had for not living on a prison planet. Literally dropped the general population's IQ by a standard deviation and, via intense distraction, made people a lot less likely to pursue difficult scientific careers. Because how are you supposed to focus on textbooks and science when your brain is used to 5 second tiktoks? We will rot on this shitty planet forever because of this unironically.

So yes, fuck all non-medical technology, shit needs to be destroyed and forgotten. Smartphones and computers have done infinitely more harm than good.

>>6676956
Luddite is no longer an insult at this point

>>6673951
y'all can't stop this, the only thing that could give AI art away is that it's so much better than 99% of drawpiggies stuff, but otherwise there's no way of distinguishing AIart from old art.
Y'all lost the war already, it don't matter if y'all "win" ONE battle.

What is stopping you from opening up an AIslop patreon and use whatever funds it gets to commission real artists you like?

>>6677104
>>6677154
idk how anon found the worst possible photo of japan possible to show the "most aesthetic culture". Weebs don't deserve Japan.

>>6677221
Er, didn't you hear? Patreon is banning AI too, bro...

>>6677233
So what, we'll just transition to another platform

AIsisters...

>>6677239
True... Just two more weeks of HRT and we'll pass...

>>6677154
>first pic
Can't walk or you get killed, scorching heat, anti-life
>second pic
vibrant public space, safe, people able to walk around

>>6677251
nice delusions weeb

>>6677249
AIart already passes and is even better then old art, most of the new artworks you liked already were AI without you even realizing it, we won you lost, face it luddite.

>>6677260
>luddite
you already lost

>>6677260
It only passes when put in front of soulless consumers like you. /ic/ is a board of artists and art hobbyists, most any artist at any skill level can detect a lack of humanity, even in human drawn art. You don't belong here go back to redd1t or tw1tter and leave these people alone.

Are AI prompters are just cryptobros and incels?

>>6677326
On dunning kryuger yes. Take away their toy and imagine what remains

>>6677260
How can you win if AI artwork is not copyrightable? SCOTUS also laid down groundwork for existing fair claims by AI fans in greater scrutiny. So how exactly are you winning?

>>6677259
It's true though. Most major cities in america have drug addicted losers crawling around, attaching needles to toy arrows. At least in japan you will only encounter people luring you into bars or drunk salarymen.

>>6677316
We pass whether you like or not drawpiggie.
>>6677359
We don't need AIart to be copyrightable to ascend to the transhuman future, and once the big corpos decide that's it's time to completely ditch drawslaves, the government will come around too.
The transition has already begun and it's inevitable.

>>6677385
>pre-AI artwork world is one of the oldest entrenched examples of old money there ever will be
>will not let anything happen to their investment vehicles and money laundering options
>many purchasers of these artworks are, if you look at the historical provenance, corporations themselves
>expecting corps to shoot themselves in the foot financially over artwork

Anon, pls.

>>6677190

Who are you to talk about the so called progress when you cant even respect the planet that gives you everything?

You are as diseased as AI supporters.

>>6677385
I, too, support a transhumanist, transgender technocracy. I know I will be part of the Elite class who will thrive and live the fullest of lives hole the useless eaters are culled. The AI gods themselves have told me as much. Drawglodytes know it is inevitable as well, but unfortunately for them, most are still in the denial phase.

>>6677392
Damn you are so stupid it isn't even funny.

Who exactly is going to be protecting and respecting the planet when everyone is a braindead, short-term focused zoomer? Who is going to be an ecologist, who is going to develop more environmentally friendly industrial systems? If anything I am arguing FOR not turning Earth into a prison planet.

Fucking idiot seriously, you do more harm to the environment by sucking up air to keep your sub 100 iq brain functioning than the entire technoindustrial complex. At least they do something good with the resources they waste. You? Inhaling air so your dumbfuck brain can continue to generate low IQ posts on 4chan.

imo everybody who wants to draw should leave this board until the hypetrain dies down, reading this kind of AIposting wheter in favor or not is literal poison for the brain
In what other platforms can you find similar vibes? Should /ic/ move en masse to another place?

>>6677432
you should move into my mind
we can be friends

i mean, banning AIspam seems unfeasible and people keep replying to these posts, samefagging from pajeets is rampant, board is kill

>>6677436
i am poison for the brain too

i mean, is making like, a forum, idk a discord channel momentary escape from the aishilling so unfeasible? Like some organized thing with a dedicated post and all?

>>6677444
i think the /dad/ people have some kind of website, but from what i hear they have some drama and vendettas and shit so I don't really know if I'd want to hang with anons from here

>>6677437
Rule:
> Only post art you made

Mods:
> Lmao I will just ignore that

>>6677154
>>6677231
not a weeb. i like mostly classic western comics, but dig japanese aethetics.
btw this is now a japanese interior inspo thread (preferably vintage showa style).

>>6677568

>>6677569

>>6677570

i lived in japan for a bit and there was this cramped ramen shop 5 minutes away from my place
i wish i had pics because it was honestly the comfiest place to eat

>>6677568
>>6677569
>>6677570
>>6677571
nice

Damn AI fag L's keep stacking up

AIsisters how come they don't want us

>>6677572
sounds cozy af anon, hope to make it there one day.

>>6677657

>>6676945
First they ignore you
Then they laugh at you
Then they fight you
Aaaand you end up in jail for fraud. Where have I heard that before?

>>6676934
>trend guy
>pay for blue check
>pay for a extra cable to put a cable on his cable because he needs a cable in his apple product
>pay for extended batery time on his tesla
>pay for adobe pack
>pay for bored apple
>pay to generate HD AI images
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Z9v0DH4mPqA

What's with the crack down on freedom?

>>6677104
this image is as dystopian as it gets

>>6677884
(((our socials betters))) are massive control freaks.

>>6677568
This just looks like your average American bar from 30-40 years ago. More proof that the west fell off hard after the 90s.

>>6677660

>>6677911

>>6677385
r/singularity is more your speed for your cyberpunk fanfic bro

Imagine caring about AI in 2022+1

>>6677154
>>6677251
>first pic
Truck stop surrounded by the natural beauty of the expansive Pennsylvania countryside, entirely separate from where people actually live
>second pic
Corporate hellhole crammed full of mindless cityslickers like a neon-colored rat's nest, hope you like getting trampled lol

>>6677835
>pays for water when there's a river and we can dig wells
>pays for electricity when you can make candles and torches from animal fats and oils
>pays for unsanitary and cramp living cubicles when there's free land everywhere
>pays rajesh and vladmir to move around in 4 wheels instead of 2
>pays goldberg to buy thing with card instead of cash and to send cops if he doesnt invite tyrone in for a meal
>pays zhang from ccp to make this post in ggggg instead gggg
[you are here] https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=_B0CyOAO8y0

>>6678147
In the 15th century, torturing and killing people for doing witchcraft would have been considered a very progressive thing to do...

>>6677884
>a club telling you to fuck off is a violation of freedom
Let me guess, you're the weird kid who's still mad nobody at school wanted you to join their circle?

>>6678125
that looks like terrible scar in the earth

>>6677907
Yep

https://twitter.com/ehalm_/status/1660914850107883520

This is the future AIniggers want. Content absolutely human-free

>>6677154
godzilla! :o

>>6678446
this is Kabukicho btw, the place Yakuza games(Kamurocho) are based on. redlight/entertainment district.

>>6677154
You could at least argue that the bottom pic isn't full of globohomo slop. Japan is pretty good about keeping everything domestic.

You guys really take people like >>6677385 and >>6677260 seriously? You realize this dude is baiting you fags hard, right?

>>6678442
Machines will write poetry and make art while humans work in coal mines and unclog toilets.

Love it.

>>6677104
>most aesthetic culture
meh. most trad cultures were highly aesthetic. it's just that Japanese has kept a bunch of it (houses, temples, etc.); the patterns are largely used when considering Japan from outside.

google-image "countryside China". in note the West, cathedrals are unequaled in scale and refinements (remove in your mind the dark dusty layer introduced by cars pollution), and try to picture ancient Rome/Greece from what remains of it.

we've lost so much

>>6678487
yes and it's all ur fault

>>6677417

It is a fact that the problem is not the planet, but weak people that cant support what has true value.

You are a hysterical faggot, that is incapable of appreaciating anything worthwhile, you just attempt to degrade all, because you want everything to be as low as you are.

Your type is the disease of the planet, and people like you support all the things you are complaining about, since, just like you, they have no soul and no balls.

lol

>>6678521
okay looooooool lemma flagellate myself then looooool xd

>twitter.com/stealcase/status/1662872955557167105
aini/g/ger got found out and tried to further deceive by faking a WiP, still gets btfo. in case anyone needed extra examples of the duplicitous nature of those AI users.

>>6678762
just one bad egg, real ai artists aren't like this

>>6678766
there aren't any AI artists

>>6677918

>>6678442
yeah, this is exactly why a few months ago I've made the decision to slowly back away from the internet and go back to touching grass. it will become slowly unusable

>>6678766
>"Real" AI artists
Ok.jpg

>>6678442
>AI dude hypes on and on about the AI and the ramifications it can have and itd unlimited potential
>several posts about nothing but needing to scrape from other's transcripts and how this will bring more monetization

You AI pajeets and chuds are the absolute worst. Not one soul among the lot of you, even amalgamating scraps. It's always only about stealing and making money.

>>6678785
how about you prove your prompt sculpting skills to us then? If it's so easy and not an art form you should have no trouble at all generating something good and unique like true AI masters can

>>6678766
lmao, yeah. like that Nikko Mercialo guy a few months back who bought traditional art tools, printed AI images and painted over them to pretend that he's a traditional artist, and the first thing that stood out is that he had no idea how to mix colors on the palette.

>>6678837
kek, good one but a bit too obvious.

>>6678834
https://youtu.be/McM3CfDjGs0

TLDW, YT has a content farm crisis and is made worse by AI.

It's almost always banking on its generative properties. Content farms are the first to benefit to this, and no not just YouTube but other platforms as well. Regulation both government and private has always been its fate.

>>6678837
"AI image generators" were released to the public a year ago. "AI masters" developed their "skills" under less than 6 months apparently. it takes a decade of hard work to draw competently, who are you even trying to fool here? you should considered tricking clueless boomers on Facebook with this shit. I've played with NovelAI for a few months to generate retarded text and it follows the same concept with images. it's easy as shit and most importantly it won't even be relevant any time soon as proompting will get immediately automated. what you're doing now is nothing more than fuck around with a software that has no user interface yet. it's like me flaunting that I'm some kind of tech expert for using ERP software at work from the 90's because it looks like Windows command prompt

>>6678837
>good and unique
I need to see some examples of what you consider "good and unique" AI generation, lmao.

>>6678849
These are the people who were screeching in that other thread that "developing and honing your skills and coming into your own style" was nothing but suffering and that we demanded others suffer solely because we "suffered" (aka put in the time).

>Why should I have to practice my bowling technique to be considered a competitive bowler? You just want me to suffer!
>Why should I have to undergo an apprenticeship to get called a tradesman? You just want me to suffer!
>Why should I learn how a Singer machine works if I want to be called an embroiderer? You just want me to suffer!

>>6678850
https://www.instagram.com/retro_fantasy_ai/
https://www.instagram.com/3lot3ro/
https://www.instagram.com/01000101_01100111_01101111/
Just to name a few AI masters, face it drawslave, your time has come to an end, this is art democratization manifest.

>>6678857
Masters of F5 you mean lol

>>6678857
>midjourney random button
nice "master"

>>6678857
Literally this >>6678847 but for art

>>6678857
All i see are bots

>>6678857
What you think you see as these people's skill is just the skill and talent of the thousands of artists the AI stole from. I feel like this is obvious yet apparently a ton of you idiots exist. You can call it democratization and I'll keep calling it a thieving attempt to strip value from art, because that's precisely what it is.

>>6678868
have you ever had people posting the :fire: emoji to your art? Didn't think so....
>>6678861
>>6678862
>>6678867
Y'all be hating, but the common folx loves it, we're tired of you posting your shit scribbles and acting like you're hot shit, the transition to AI cannot be stopped.
>>6678878
Every artist copies, but when the AI and the engineers behind it do it it's no longer legit? At least they give back their skills to the common folx, y'all just want to keep making bucks and gate keep.

>Imagine wanting an internet mostly composed of AI generated stuff

>>6678890
> have you ever had people posting the :fire: emoji to your art? Didn't think so
No, because i get genuine and human made comments

>>6678890
Being inspired by is not the same as being fed pixel perfect 1-to-1 copies of existing artwork.

>>6678853
you'd think that decades of people's reactions to roids usage/abuse would serve as an example of what people think about taking cheap fake shortcuts.

>>6678890
>have you ever had people posting the :fire: emoji to your art? Didn't think so....
those comments tend to be bots, anon. bots always leave these vapid "hype" comments for everything, and they've been doing it for ages with crypto. it's especially obvious when you see one tweet spammed by bots like these and none of the comments have any sort of organic interactions or likes. how dumb are you?

>>6678891
I think the internet proved itself too far gone at this point, compared to 15 years ago.
Going forward there's no winning scenario, it's either a tightly, state controlled platform to contain AIs or a far west of uncontrollable infinite spam and forgeries.

>>6678902
I don't think state control is even needed, more of it will just happen if things go really really dire. Private entities will just stop AI generated content from ruining user experience unless they intend to do so.

>>6678901
>anon goes on Tinder
"Wow, all these girls with long strings of numbers and letters after an underscore are DMing me 3 word sentences and links! I must be a hit with these ladies!"

>>6678904
It's already happening, politicians are trigger happy now about regulating "fake news" and "ending encryption", with AI forgeries coming to the masses stricter controls are inevitable, whether these controls are state enforced or privately enforced doesn't change much I think, look at 4chan, it's already a feds honeypot for /pol/tards, or Microsoft recording everything you do on their operating systems whether you like or not, which they will most likely share with the authorities.

>>6678890
>but the common people
They dont. you are literally in a thread where pixiv banned this retarded shit
But alas, its clear you are replying just for the (you)'s

You could've easily avoided this by
>Not spamming with your toy
>Not being a fucking grifter about it
But no, your fucking toy is associated with being a grifting ass nigger on the internet. You could've made something amazing but you assholes are massive idiots

>>6678857
>AI masters

>>6678928
It could never be avoided, it was literally created for data laundering.
It would never work if they didn't scrapped and stole images from all the boorus and twitter/artstation/instagram.

Why do you think this isn't happening to music? They can't scrap the internet for data without getting themselves in the mud with publishing song studios.

>>6678960
Voice is pretty close, but last I checked everyone fucking hated it because you can "bring back" the dead.

>>6678967
I really find distasteful when they "revived" 2Pac for that one concert. The dude is dead, let him rest and just enjoy what you have.

>>6678967
I'd understand if the "AI" could come up with a new voice, but as far as I see, for now it's just taking the voice of a real person. it's yet another form of parasitism

>>6678967
I don't get the hype about voice cloning. It sounds extremely lifeless and sterile.

>>6678795

>>6679173

>>6679176

>>6679177
TBF this one could easily be a Denny's in Nebraska.

>>6679176
God damn that is one cluttered menu.

>>6679184
That's a menu? I thought it was just covered in good luck charms or something.

>>6679185
kek

>>6679185
A lot of asian restaurants FOR asian people that are more hole in the wall will have a piecemeal menu that they put up or take down with little pieces of paper like this. Saves having to print or construct an actual menu. Is it efficient? Yes. Is it nice to look at after a while? Depends on your eyes.

lmao all this will do is just make people not label ai art as ai generated, like have fun telling it apart inkcels because the normie coomer doonatoors certainly won't. I hate the typical ai pajeet shitting crappy generations without any work/edit but people who can just open mspaint and brush over details or even blend multiple generations will win out.

ps you can glaze aigenerated artworks to bypass ai image detectors.

>>6679223
hmmm yesss that's good copium *hufffff*

>>6679223
Cry some more Ranjepp

>>6679223
Correcting AI mistakes still requires actual effort and understanding of art to begin with, otherwise you Ecce Homo the AI generation even further. Also, the US Copyright Office requires you to state how the image was generated, and AI cannot be copyrighted. Good luck making money when everyone and their mom can use the exact same image you generated for their own ends should they wish.

>>6679223
>yes as long as i didn't tell them, they won't ever figure out i'm a fraud
yeah i'm sure that will turn out good for you ranjeet, it's not like there's already an example that show how retarded your idea is.

>>6679223
Holy shit I sure hope so, not only will you retards get blacklisted from constantly getting banned by breaking ToS, but will also poison future datasets with your own slop lol.

>>6679238
>US Copyright Office requires you to state how the image was generated
or you know... you can just lie. Who's gonna prove shit?

There isn't an objective way to prove ai art was done by ai if especially when you obfuscate it from detectors.

>>6679252
The unreal, stupidly over-detailed rendering on an animu girl with fucked up (or hidden) hands just standing in the middle of a classical painting covered in grease, very pointedly not doing anything or cracking a pose even slightly dynamic or difficult to draw, will give it away.

>>6679252
>>6679257, as well as the fact that you don't want to get caught lying to the US Copyright Office. Go ahead and lie - it's totally not like they're going to have an automatic presumption that you're lying again for any future piece you put in front of them and now you have the task of trying to prove a negative.

.... or you can just pick up a pencil and draw. Why can't you people just make your own fucking art without all the scraping and loras and positive/negative prompts? Just fucking draw.

>>6679264
>Why can't you people just make your own fucking art without all the scraping and loras and positive/negative prompts?
That's the thing, real artists aren't the ones shilling for AI. They draw. They don't care about their 'work' getting stolen since, a) most artists aren't getting any work in the first place and are doing it as a PASSION. and b) AI is still utter shit for getting a very specific vision onto canvas, and that, coupled with unique styles in demand, keeps human artists in business.
AI Shills don't actually care about drawing. They don't even LIKE drawing. They don't love the creative process - they see it as an inconvenience separating them from the pretty end product they want. AI shills by and large are usually commissionfags - like, super autistic drama magnet commissionfags, like the kind you find on /acrg/ on /trash./ You know, the ones without a creative bone in their body but lots of cool ideas for their SO AMAZING COOL ORIGINAL CHARACTERS which are usually completely one dimensional and a vehicle for their fucked up sexual perversions.
I get the general impression that promptfags are just really goddamn jealous of artists, and as such, absolutely desperate to prove their photobashed kitschy crap even holds a candle to real artwork with real intent and a real creative vision.

>>6679276
It's really no different than if they had an art friend who could pump out a new picture every 5 seconds. And the AI shill goes "no, that's now what I want, do it again," and they just keep doing that until the art friend finally makes something they like. And it's like ok, fine, but you still aren't the artist. Does that mean all the medieval nobles and art commissioners today artists? No, it doesn't, because why would they be? They're just glorified commissioners.

>>6679287
Whoops, meant to write "not", typed too fast.

>>6679257
Skill issue and only a temporary limitation. Nothing you can't fix with more training. Hell controlnets with depth libraries make hands trivial. What you see published on 4chan and such are just crappy generations from amateurs. Anyone with talent or autism can easily fix shit, it's just that most people have no need to put in any effort because there is no payoff.

>>6679264
>generate artwork
>overlay paper
>hook up a pencil strapped to a machine to draw over it
>inkcels still btfo

>>6679276
I lora train obscure waifus so I can masturbate to them in private, or just want the satisfaction that only I trained shit enough that I can effortlessly spam accurate character art that I can use for memes. I get autistic about details and rage over shitty ai artworks of my waifus from shitters using crappy loras from civitai. I haven't publicized shit. I generate a ton of shit and if I find something nice I then autistically try to fix all the details using more generations, blending, drawing shit over it myself, upscaling. I don't care I have no fucking clue what I'm doing. I've spent hours looking at assholes and cunnies so I can replicate better details. I have exemplary taste and notion of how shit should look like. Crappy gens irk me the same way but stable diffusion threads are not even intended as actual places to post good shit. I mean there should some distinction of ai pajeets from ai cunnyisseurs. I'm all for websites filtering these shitters but people are going to just end up lying to legitimize their enhanced ai art.

also notion of ai shit being pajeet territory is laughable when higher res art and models will eventually require better gpus, something pajeets lack access to.

>>6679311
>hooking pencils strapped to machines to draw
Again, all that work just to avoid drawing and improving your own skills.

>>6679314
>look at these faggots using a lightbulb to see in the dark, those unrefined swine are nothing compared to us true patricians who smash twigs together for hours to light a fire.

I only care for the end result, more lusciously made cunny artwork for my own benefit.

>>6679223
>hello, I'm a completely new artist who already paints lika a pro, no I never had an social media presence before or CV, also, no I'll will not post psd files or anything other than completely finished works, never sketches.
Yes, nobody will suspect a thing for sure.
Even if the generations were perfect, you'd still be suspected of be using AIs and you wouldn't be able to prove otherwise.

Aren't most artists using computers for some corporation? Yes, they have "soul" and "an eye for art" but they're not using pencils or brushes. This "you must mechanically create using traditional strokes" hasn't been true for many decades. Artists stealing from other artists and using digital tools is the way things are done. Please, stop being delusional about this.

>>6679319
Then why do AI users hold themselves out as artists?

>>6679319
>I only care for the end result
SEE WHAT I FUCKIN' MEAN?

>>6679323
Not all do. Some have fun making artists seethe since a vast majority are washed out amerimutt leftist scum. Others are just simply grifters. If you want to make a quick buck from losers then of course you're going to hype the shit out of your art and praise AI as the new savior of the human race.

I find appreciation in aesthetic shit so when I make generate shit I try to generate shit until it looks good. Will it be perfect? obviously no. Will the tech get good enough where I can just jack off instead of counting fingers? who knows.

>>6679322
Low level bait anon, but still, I and many others still use physical mediums, just digital is obviously more convenient for work related stuff.
>>6679319
>>I only care for the end result, more lusciously made cunny artwork for my own benefit.
So what you use it for is a glorified booru site, unless you are getting very specific images you couldn't before, but since most coom images are just mostly random characters standing around doing nothing, I doubt it.
I hope at least you aren't one of those tards that want to "retvrn to tradition"

>>6679326
and what is wrong with that? Labor is for suckers.

>>6679329
>others still use physical mediums
Fine. Knock yourself out. What is the market share for art that depends on technology vs. hand crafted? 99% ?

>>6679327
Based, pencilpigs will squeal and moan, but the transition cannot be stopped, AI has been injected into the system and there's no turning back now.
Soon enough AIart will be impossible to tell apart from obsolete one, since it already passes for most people.

>>6679330
>>6678853

>>6679333
As I said, yes, for work digital is more convenient, also the argument about "muh physical medium" is retarded.
There are crutches with digital art, but if you're a competent artist you're a competent artist.
Some things I do better in traditional mediums(inking, precise work, certain art styles) some I do better in digital(much faster painting, sketching)

>>6679329
I'll just admit I don't really even jack off to my images but I did get autistic about replicating details of characters but I don't really know what to do besides 1girl booru art. 2 seperate characters in one image is too much of a hassle, wide images are a hassle, I don't even do porn because dicks and sex are also such a hassle to get right, but I just like knowing I could if I wanted to, though it might take hundreds of gens to get just right as a starting point to further improve the image. I'm only a neet and doing this shit just as a hobby. I'm already satisfied when I train a lora and my gens are character accurate.

I mean when you spend hours trying to fix a fucked up ai foot because you can't draw for shit is still some kind of effort.

>>6679348
The issue is when people argue that the efforts are the exact same. You might be trying to fix your prompt, but that is not the same as trying to personally redraw the foot.

>>6673951
My account is still up and running

>>6679338
>but the transition cannot be stopped, AI has been injected into the system and there's no turning back now.
>Soon enough AIart will be impossible to tell apart from obsolete one, since it already passes for most people.
You will never be a woman or a real artist.

>>6679311
>>6679252
Lmao, opinions like these really highlight how ignorant and naive the AI shitters, who have never worked in any commision market or the commercial industry at all, "just lie bro", "just hook up the pencil to the machine or something bro". Commision market wise, people have been detecting traced art since the dawn of the internet, actual artists with experience tried to used AI and masked the shitty artifacts and they still got caught, maybe they can fool people once or twice, but they all got caught, no matter how good the AI get, which it already peaked with Lora and controlnet, and people can still detect it easily just based on the thumbnail, and one simple question of "hey can you post your WIP video", which is a very common request is enough to out the AI shitters. Commercial wise, nigga it has been two years, before all of this copyright law even cracking down, most entertainment companies were already iffy about using AI, you could clearly see that they love the opportunities to jump on every shitty trends, nft, meta, crypto, but they sure as hell didnt touch AI art generator, but now with the laws clearly state what is right and wrong, what is fair use and not, which deem all AI art as not usable for commercial and AI niggers are nothing but art commisioner, they wont even dare to touch it now. You can say the genie is out of the bottle as many time you want, you can go on to other boards and multiple website to say how the "inkcel and drawfag are gona get replaced" and how you btfo all of the artists and make them seethe, but the laws have only been tightened up, Europe straight up banned AI shit, China limited the use of AI and forced AI niggers to clearly label their work, US copyright law deemed AI not copyrightable, most art websites already banned or soft banned you, and it will only get worse from now on that the law is catching on, no artist in any legitimate entertainment companies are getting replaced or fired.

>>6679357

>>6679348
>I generate shit until i satisfied
>I spent a lot of time on this so it is art
>I spend a lot time playing a gacha game so it must worth something
You are literally coping with your sad existence right now you dopamine fried addict. You might be better go back playing video game right now than coping that you have any worth pretending to be an artist.

>>6679364
>pretending to be an artist.
I dunno it's kinda fun. I thought it was the same for you guys as well.

Cont
No one is gonna hire you to push button, and even if in a fucked up reality where AI slops are acceptable and people actually get fired, why would they hire a talentless drawless fuck that know easy skill when they could just hire an artist and teach them how to prompt? People are ostracizing you on almost all platforms, no one is impressed with your work, you generated hundred of AI slop in a second and all of them are just noise and valueless, all the AI creative works have only been either nfts, AI generated VNs, phone game slops or get rich scam, that is the reality, at best you are lazy porn addict who are looking to dump your mediocre porn slop and dilute quality workspace even more, at worst you are grifters, scammers promoting get rich scam, scraping and parasiting off hardworking people. That is the reality.

All I wanted was more artwork of my waifus, I'm not gonna pay shit to some jap.

good morning sirs

>>6679366

>>6679366
You honestly think that's supposed to be some kind of epic own, don't you? Why do you have to be like this? It's not like there's even any real gatekeeping, all you have to do is draw anything yourself, LITERALLY anything.

>>6679362
copypasting other anon reply, here is my source, where is yours?
>AI act
It's a bit long, you can read it on https://artificialintelligenceact.eu
Pretty much, among other things, it makes the use of open source AI models illegal, with heavy fees for hosting sites like github.
You can read about it on https://technomancers.ai/eu-ai-act-to-target-us-open-source-software/
>In a bold stroke, the EU’s amended AI Act would ban American companies such as OpenAI, Amazon, Google, and IBM from providing API access to generative AI models.
>bans third countries from using it
>You have to register your “high-risk” AI project or foundational model with the government
>API Essentially Banned
>explain in detail
it's explained in that article m8. Open source models are the ones that produce that kind of "Wow" AI art because they sample more specific artists
(for example in my research i found some specific models with API access to stablediffusion that specialized in anime girls, porn, backgrounds, pixel art etc,
those are the ones producing AI art that looks more like the real thing), while for example dall-e 2 or stablediffusion are more generalist.
It is pretty much impossible to produce actual illustrations like the one you posted only on those models, let alone if they have to give up on copyrighted images.
>Accountability, Ethics, and the Need for Clear Legal Guidelines: This case raises ethical questions about the responsibility of AI developers to respect copyright and other legal and ethical guidelines in AI training, and regulation.
https://twitter.com/stealcase/status/1659583557730287618/video/1


https://twitter.com/stealcase/status/1659584037571248130
>US copyrightlaw denouncing AI work and deeming them not copyrightable
https://www.federalregister.gov/documents/2023/03/16/2023-05321/copyright-registration-guidance-works-containing-material-generated-by-artificial-intelligence

Any passing by AI niggers are free to refute

>>6679380

When AI is criminalized, only criminals will use
AI.

>>6676934
>go to website for questions
>oh boy, answers from experts and seafarers about how ships work!
>ENTER
>THE AI MASTERMIND
>"water ships are ships that operate on water! have you tried plugging your ship into the earth?"
>"oh, I see, the ship can't connect to the earth. Have you tried dropping an anchor and connecting to the earth that way?"

>have to wade through ads and AI shit just to find an actual human who has responded
>the human was providing the answer for free, there was no need to replace them with AI in the first place
fuck off

>>6679383
That's not a rebuttal. That's a random opinion.

>>6679383
this is why no one is taking you seriously, feel free to try again.

>>6679380
>The hell you see when you pour insecticide into a manhole

>>6679390
I forgot to mention
underneath the question it also provides an ad saying "THE SOLUTION IS AMAZON AI! BUY AI NOW!"

>>6679380
>https://artificialintelligenceact.eu
ah yes the typical retard who only reads headlines and doomsayers
1. not passed
2. very early drafts
3. it's primarily anti mutt and anti chink shit
4. does not target AI image gens specifically, only talks of propositions ergo nothingburger
5. overblown
6. lmao thinking the eu ever unanimously agrees, look at car manufacturing with germany vs france
7. it's more of a privacy issue, italy banned chatgpt for a while and they're back

>US copyrightlaw denouncing AI work and deeming them not copyrightable
no cases yet for or against, where ai art was enchanced where there could be an argument of tranformative value. Not really comparable to Andy Warhol Foundation for the Visual Arts, Inc. v. Goldsmith.

open sourcing ai is good, jews don't want that

>>6679383
This nigga's face lookin like he got his shit beat up one too many times in highschool. No wonder why he's like that now.

>>6679402
Did you even read any of the articles? It literally says it right there, any creative work created by prompts are not copyrightable, the time that you AI niggers moan about spending prompting, doesn not result in ownership, hell they even brought up a case of the Zarya of the Dawn comic, where the the author used AI to generate all the art slop, tried to apply for copyright and got told to fuck off. lmao, non of those sources are bringing up the Andy Warhol case because you AI niggers would just use it to move the goal post, even then, that case served as an example case for any other uppity AI niggers trying to hustle again.
>where ai art was enchanced where there could be an argument of tranformative value
AI art can only be considered copyrightable if the artists use AI as a tool to create orginal work ie referencing or hevily edit the AI work and can only use that hevily edited part (you fixed the shitty AI hands? you can only keep the new hands as yours, not the other parts). Most ai niggers can't even draw, let alone editing anything to look passable. Actually read all of it before trying to summarize it in small unrelated out of cotext points.

>>6679402
>no cases yet for or against
because it's worthless, there's no reason to waste court time over nodev artlet cope

might as well be sending people to court over ctrl-c ctrl-v-ing NFTs

>>6679402
What are you talking about? The Copyright Office has literally declared AI work non-copyrightable.

>>6679429
>read any of the articles?
yes and they're bullshit

>Zarya of the Dawn comic, where the the author used AI to generate all the art slop, tried to apply for copyright and got told to fuck off
because it was about a tranny made by a tranny? denying that shit was just funny. If a white guy brought some fine cunny art to those gentlemen at the office then maybe it should be copyrighted. also the fist problem is
>don't admit it's ai generated in the first place retard.
Until I read about a case where an artwork was disproved of copyright because it was proved it was ai generated then I don't give a shit. also muh copyright. lmao who the fuck actually cares about that besides inkcels

>can only use that hevily edited part
I traced over the image and added transformative dots, prove that I didn't

retards somehow thinking they will change pajeet's mind
stop wasting effort on people who will never engage with you in good faith

Wait, do AI "artists" have portfolios and personas and identities around the art they prompt? Do they think they have a style? Are there popular prompters like there are popular artists?

>>6679447
https://arstechnica.com/information-technology/2023/02/us-copyright-office-withdraws-copyright-for-ai-generated-comic-artwork/

Also, no, it's on you to prove that you added the transformative work, not the other way around. This is how it works when you submit things for legal copyright approval.

Will they go to Deviantart?

>>6679540
DA and Artstation are the two biggest sites for AI now.

>>6679500
Of course, some could be called the "old masters" of prompt sculpting, were the mastery comes from expertly mixing various artists with positives and negatives weights, very complex discipline.
>>6679543
Art Station will be the last to back down, if they ever will, considering they're owned by Epic and Tim Sweeney is completely soulless.

>>6679447
>transformative
You don't know what that means. Look up fair use law. It is NOT "add something to a pic and now it's your pic." The USE must be transformed, not the pic, hence transformative use. Can't go take a book cover and use it as your book cover after "transforming it"

don't care ai transforms it for me ;) oh wait it doesn't? hmm then what's the whole babble about inkcels crying about ai stealing copyright if ai doesnt have copyright? checkmate losers

also most of you fucking inkcels spittin stupid shit like you imply yall makin some fucking Dangelos every drawing and sending them directly to the big copyright headquaters for what fucking purpose?

oh wait it's because it's automatically granted and I don't need to prove shit. The only day I'll ever give a shit about copyright is if some artcel suddenly decides to litigate against my masterpieces and sue me
except the artcel will lose because they're poor lmfao

>>6679737
you guys broke him too hard

>>6679737
You're literally going insane man, I don't like you but you've got me worried, nobody types like that unless they're about to shoot someone on Walmart.

>>6679737
You talk like a zoomer and are clearly arguing in bad faith, but I'll respond anyway. The transformative factor is to claim it under fair use as a defense, not for copyright law. Despite automatic copyright being granted for many published pieces, people still send more important pieces to the US Copyright Office so that there is an official record besides a randomly-named Twitter post, actually tied to a real name or federally-filed entity. Indeed, you and other AI artists are quite fortunate for now that nobody thus far has pissed off someone who is rich and is willing to either lobby legislative bodies to either enact proactive anti-AI laws or to litigate the matter yet in court. But all it takes is one direct thing to get the ball rolling.

>>6679737
schizoid post

>>6676961
Pathetic parasite

>>6677220
At least we can take consolation in the fact that you disgusting parasites have been swiftly dealt with. You cannot make money from this exploitation anymore and it's only gona get worse for you.
Regarding us being artpigs and whatnot it's such a pathetic cope from your side. We all know an artpig is a more fitting description of you guys. No ethics, no morals, no love and as manipulative as they come. Bunch of parasites. Keep coping loser. Fuck all of you worms.

The day has finally come when AIggers are getting bullied so hard they either straight up leave the board (no new AI threads in the last few days!) or they start having a mental breakdown.
These fags have been getting thoroughly dismantled and deconstructed in every thread they've started in the last week and I am LIVING for it. The catharsis of seeing these smug roaches getting dabbed into the soil after shitting up this board and other spaces for so long borders on the orgasmic.
And since no one's posted it yet, here it is. This is all that your AIshitters ever were- automated photobashing. Stealing shit and mixing it together. This illusion of unlimited creation and "democratized" art- ha!- is crumbling to dust. Your magical machine that learns and creates like a human was nothing more than a fantasy this whole time.

>>6679737
Mate, I ain't reading that shit.

It's joever

AI is kill bros. Its joever

who is joever?

>>6679737

Use chatgpt

>>6677251
> now its not about aesthetics but feeling safe

>>6680333
Doctors fear the consultant

Are AIfags just commies?

>>6673951
it is, its just good publicity to comply with the retarded tweens that want to "protect" their highly skilled anime drawings.
been using ai from the start, best thing about being an artist and knowing how to make good prompts is that no one can tell. best tool to hit the industry.

>>6678354
That's America, baby.

>>6679173
If there's a restaurant in the backrooms, this is it. Uncanny and tacky af. Why is the floor wearing a condom?

>>6680333
>0
jesus christ, AI generated AI shill with AI generated pfp

>>6680720
Anon, your mom and friends are only saying your proompts look good because they were being polite.

>>6680720
if you're so proud, why are you saying "nobody can tell" is a benefit? Are you pretending its not ai?

>>6680059
>>6677220
>>6680720
>>6678857
Ai "art" is antihuman and is the influence of Satan. It removes all the soul and passion from art (whether literature, music, painting, drawings, etc) AI "art" will always be a pale imitation of what us beings make. It carries no creativity, no emotion, and no message. it is merely spam meant to dilute any actual creation. It should be banished back to hell for its horridness and lack of humanity

Why is reddit and minority on /ic so against AI? Seems like a new tool that might pan out.

>>6681209
the majority is indifferent about it and is yet to forge an actual opinion. The fight is among shills and actual artists who are in the minority.

>>6681209
>Most of 4 chan hate "the vax"
>(((People))) who invested and force "the vax" also invested and lobbied for AI thievery.
I wonder why.

>>6681245
Why do ai artist want to make art when they can do this? U'll make so much money selling yellow journalism and fake new stories

>>6681245
The hand is the issue? Not that the policeman and the woman change with every iteration? You'd think thats the first thing people would notice.

>>6680813
I honestly wouldn't be surprised if that were actual human writing. Absolutely reads like something a consultant/marketing hypeman would write; amusingly enough, they'd probably be among the first to go in the AI-induced job pruning.

>>6680333
That was shared on r/LinkedinLunatics (yes yes, plebbit, but hear me out) and a lot of insane shit is coming from Indians. Have fun with this knowledge.

>>6681309
>ai artists
>>6681209
weak bait

>>6673951
Looks like they just hate money.
Don't they realize that it is AI artists keeping them afloat?

https://www.reddit.com/r/StableDiffusion/comments/13e51gx/patreon_is_conducting_a_survey_to_determine_ai/

>>6682806
I hope your post is sarcasm because that sounds absolutely retarded

>>6682818
If it wasn't for promt-bros people like Rembrandt would be doomed to be forgotten.
But now AI artists could (if they feel generous) mention them and keep their names alive.

>>6682847
pajeet constantly flipping between "AI will kill artists" and "AI will save artists"

>>6682847
With AI, we can revive him...

>>6682847
Why would any artist want AI parasite their audience? Most AI fags use it because they spite artist or don't want to spent a penny on art so having ai bug to notice you is like having leeches on your back.
>Artist should feel grateful because AI artist like us give them shout out
Only subhuman is this morally backward. There need to be pesticide to weed all you out this planet

>>6682856
AI saves artists by killing them

>>6682872
Tick tock :)

>all these reddit screenshots
are the pajeets here actually from reddit? it definitely makes sense

>>6682880
>digital art
>luddite
no i just hate bugmen and their stupid cult.

Uh oh AI-Chads, looks like the inkcels are using bots to rig the surveys in their favor.
Hypocrites!
Do they really think that we would believe that most people don't recognize our talents???

STOP THE COUNT!

>>6678857
you know the problems with this "masters"
I can put two hours into setting up stable diffussion, two hours into getting the hangs of it, and then replicating this "master's" work
That 100% devaluates the "master" part of the work, if anyone can do it pal

>>6682856
It's basically
>real artists should be happy that their work is getting noticed and used, even though they're not compensated; if they're not happy with this, they're not "real artists" and that they're only in it "for the money"
>image generation is the future, is more efficient, is more akin to a STEM pursuit/isn't "artsy-fartsy," therefore IT is the real job and worthy of pay
It's the epitome of the classic "you should give me free art for the exposure and experience, while ignoring the fact that I'm personally trying to use said art for my personal gain."

>>6682880
>we'll just rebuild
but they don't build shit

>>6682880
>le Amish fear le technology
What did I expect from idiots who pretend they know about religion.

>>6682806
>create a discriminatory platform and we will take our business elsewhere
No. Don't go. Please.

>>6673951
a minor victory but the AI war rages on

I cant take any ai comment seriously anymore

>>6682806
so this is the famous reddit-tier IQ

>>6682806
lol, all those fags larping as artists and creators.

idk there are many parts of drawing i'd gladly skip (and often use shortcuts like photoshop filters anyways) and everytime i asked aichuds about ways to optimize an actual creative process they never could answer me
seems like shitty text2image models trained on hot girls is the most they can do

lately i'm feeling like drawfags should like, not reject this stuff completely and start using it in an ethical way, but then again, AI image generation inherently tends to control its user and push towards more and more automation so it's very difficult to decide...
kinda optimistic for a future where it's regulated and used properly tho

>>6683102
What parts do you skip and want to optimize?

>>6683104
from the top of my head:
filling flat colors
converting a drawing to pixel art (without changing too much of it)
making tilesets
palette swaps
textured abstract compositions to start a digital painting

these i already make with PS tricks that are very boring and i would gladly optimize with AI

to push it more, i'd consider using AI to convert lineart to rendered if i had a time constraint, but i'm still unsure if that's a good thing to do

obv with "Lineart to rendered" i mean something like picrel, not straight up getting a finished drawing

>>6682806

That fucking thread... What the actual fuck. They're so fucking stupid they think they're the victim here? Fuckin morons. A thief who cries injustice when the person they stole from fights back.

>>6683113
>>6683115
sleeper agent pajeet genes are in this one

>>6683124
they think they're on the side of the future and progress, anon. they see things like nerds or 1st-yeart philosophy dropouts with a nihilistic streak: nothing matters if the result is the same, cold efficiency is paramount. hiding behind all that logic they don't realize how their premise is flawed or how they miss the point of the artistic process because it contains icky emotions and abstract concepts. truly they are brainlets with an overinflated opinion of their own atheistic intelligence so they pile up shoddy reasonings upon one another (take the "humans get inspired so AI training is fine" for example).

>>6677154
>>6677104
oh yes, the West, a beacon of progress and human development, truly the future.

>t.not even a weeb

genuinely, how does one feel any sense of artistic accomplishment after pressing a button to do all the work for you? how do you call yourself an artist when you barely even do anything?

>>6683127
nah m8, i'm trying to figure out the right way to go about this thing and give some input that's not haha inkcel haha aisister

>do the benefits of automating part of the process largely outweigh giving up control over that part?
if yes, >are you giving up so much control that the artwork isn't considerable yours anymore?

this is just my way to go though. I feel confident in my ability to not be controlled by the tool. Would not tell others this is the best way to think, because becoming controlled by the tool is a realistic possibility. AI inherently tends to control its user

>>6683153
They think thay churning out more artwork faster = better artist and it doesnt matter that thebones oroduced have clear flaws, they just aggregate by volume and say that in the TOTALITY of pics, its better.

You need to remember these are the same people who hate the concept of drawing itself. These people literally screeched at anons a week aho saying that the process of developing your own art skills was nothing but pointless suffering and that we just wanted to see them suffer.

>>6673951
>don’t tag image as AI generated
>generate “sketches” from the image as a “proof”
>profit?

>>6683153
If you can brace yourself and read some of those in that reddit post. I'm pretty sure they consist of
>failed artist that use AI and now want people to accept their "tool" so that they don't feel like a lazy fraud
>tech cultist that believe AI is their new future
>mixed of both

>>6683165
>gets found out immediately
>lose profits and get a fine

>>6683158
or you have fags trying to justify their want for free art, like Sha/nigger/iversity

Part of the blame falls on the monkeys who were buying these shitty image packs

>>6682886
Kek anon don't remind me of the sonic vs genshin fight again lmao.

>>6673951
Account still up

>>6683312
post it nigga

>>6683172

Contemporary-artists whose work people won't even touch for AI training are one of those die hard advocates for AI.

>>6683258
How much does it cost? If it cost like 2 dollars or some shit, than pajeets can live off of it for basically nothing.

>>6683186
I won't blame anyone for wanting free shit, but what becomes ridiculous is them also demanding to be called artists because of it. That's when it becomes entitlement.

>>6682806
good lord reddit is so gay

>>6683258
Sirs, What side is this? Thansk yous

>>6682806
There's no one to compensate on the AI side
The machine does it for free

>>6683144
I've been looking for a word that describes people who are technically correct but are also morons.

>>6682880
>We'll just rebuild everything better with the technology they are terrified of.
This is their fatal flaw, that technology produces culture (when it is just a conduit). If AIshills are segregated into their own internet from the creative people who built their fucking dataset, who do they think will have the most vibrant culture in 10 years?

>>6683971
see their excuse would be "well uh, artists aren't born in a vacuum!" you can't really debate with them when the premise is flawed to begin with. which is AI training=Human training. I'm still baffled they think AI-generation is a skill worth speaking of.

I'm still seeing photorealistic porn on pixiv.
I don't think things changed

>>6684397
>Reading comprehension

>>6677104
I cannot believe you posted that picture while calling Japan aesthetic. This has to be bait

>>6684428
No I'm referring to https://www.pixiv.net/info.php?id=9640

Update your news grandpa

You who whore themselves out on social media, desperate for money, validation and attention aren't any better from an average pajeet who spams social media with their "creations" for the same reason while thinking they're an artist

True art is created and exists for it's own purpose, not to become a masturbatory tool for the artists ego

I understand why so many people are furious. Most of the modern "artistic expression" is driven by a pointless chase of immediate visual impact and instant gratification, much in the likes of AI garbage, both are extremely superficial. Nowadays there's barely anyone who understands that art should go beyond simple visual stimulation, it should represent something deeper and more profound. If your "art" is nothing but a spectacle and a cheap imitation it's no different from something a pajeet can shit out with a press of a button. Therefore it's natural to feel anger, after all the skill you developed had no real meaning to it. By continuously working to create something shallow and meaningless you have brought yourself down placing your own creations on the even playing field with the ones pajeet can extract. Except the pajeet is much more efficient at it

AI is nothing but a tool, if you feel threatened by it then your insecurity and inflated self-worth are to blame, not the technology. And if you're worried about your work being stolen to train it, you really have nothing to worry about as the only use for your work is for the computer to know what it shouldn't draw

>>6684518
2/10

>>6684518
>t. give me free shit

>>6684518
tldr

>>6684536
AI wins

>>6684010
>>6684010
At the end of the day, they want to be seen as artists. They want to use the artists bathroom. They want to look like they're being creative. They know AI isn't letting them createanything, but they're playing along with it to convince the audience.

Some actually think it's a skill though. AI removes the need to learn how to sraw, but also requires skill to get results. Its a contradiction but as long as people think they're artists, it's all good.

>>6677104
>look at all this plastic shit! so aesthetic just like in my tumblr blogs!!
kill yourself at the earliest convenience

>>6677251
>safe
Yeah because of aesthetics lol

>>6684590
Prompters are the equivalent to those that inject synthol into their arms

>>6677239
Current AI based platforms are all too afraid to allow such services because of what happens if things turn Illegal for them.

>>6682886
AI bugs don't like it when other people use bots for their own benefit? Kek

>>6673951
Pixiv is such shit I can view Paid-only works by just not logging into it, you really think they’ll come up with a tool complex enough to detect AI works when even artists can’t?

>>6677316
>Only passes in front of soulless consumers
You mean people with eyes? And the people commissioning you?

> can detect a lack of humanity
I couldn’t have said anything more indicative of an intoxication from sniffing your own’s farts than if I entered Yale and became Twitter admin

Not because of your hobby, but because of your ego is why you deserve replacement

>>6677359
>Not copyrightable
>Make AI art, pull out drawing software, fix it up here and there, sign it
>SCOTUS does a spastic breakdance on the floor trying to figure out AI or not

>>6677390
>This mf thinks we’re in the renaissance where artists are in a club with aristocrats and Machiavelli, for corpos to not aim for efficiency over a whiny zippertits bitch on Twitter

Does /ic/ really

>>6684518
They’ve got nothing to say to the fact he right

>>6690091
>>6690092
>>6690095
>>6690107
didn't get tired after getting btfo in your pruned thread?

Jannie need to range ban all of these desperate ai fuckers.

>>6690110
What’s the btfo tho

>>6690115
my sweaty balls on your face. we're not going over this again, just like >>6684518
has been repeatedly destroyed in previous threads.
last (You) for your attention-whoring ass

>>6690117
>Repeatedly destroyed
R u the pissbaby artist ? Why don’t you wanna draw together?:( I could even teach u math
>Repeatedly DESTROYED!1!
I hope ur reply got ALL the retwoots:*

>>6684518
>they hated him because he told the truth
You're throwing diamonds to demoralized cattle who just see and consume art for the pretty pictures and to get coomerbux from other cattle like them so they'll finally be rich&famous and get worshipped like celebrities only to kill themselves the moment they become irrelevant.

Honestly, at this point, just let them be oblivious and let them die. Stop explaining shit to them, stop trying to make them aware of anything. Stop trying to educate them.
Don't give them the secret recipe; they don't deserve it.

They will never be able to think beyond their own ego. Their ego is the only thing they have.

>spammer is down to samefagging