/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

yes, clearly. the fuck with the chain? the fuck is with the leather fold shapes?

>>6675696
No retard AI art is not allowed on FA

>>6675696
OP is fucking gay

>>6675696
that cock ring is ridiculously small

>>6675713
>2023
>not enjoying gay furry smut platonically

I would

AI can do furry now wtf? Furry commissioners....

>>6675696
I thought you meant the year not the picture and I was like yeah it's all probably a simulation

>>6675696
You just took someone else's art and img2img'd it, didn't you.
Don't bother replying to this thread.
These fags get btfo in the threads they make, memory hole the brutal sodomizing, and then go make a new thread to repeat the exact same things they always do.
I'm leaving this behind and then I'm out. Janny, please clean up this thread, thank you.

>>6675837
just kemono dot party this guy you double retard

this is what now? the tenth ai thread on this board?

>>6675856
lmao

>>6675854
Ah, so the artist themself img2img'd his own work. And didn't even bother to fix the glaring errors. And then tried to pass it off as "progress". That's even worse.
Oh, and thanks for making me look at disgusting gay furry porn, you degenerate faggot.

>>6675696
I like AI art but that legit just looks worse, and he didn't even fix the chain. If he just kept some of the AI elements like the way the jacket wraps around his body, the way the eyes show through the sunglasses and perhaps the fur on the chest it would've been an improvement.

>>6675881
>I like AI art
Opinion discarded

>>6675730
>ridiculously small
You're an expert?

>>6675868
Yeah if this really is AI generated it's pretty bad

>>6675896
>2020
see full image

the fact that nobody can be certain means AI has already won.

>>6675892
Yes

>>6675920
>"No one is certain"
>Meanwhile itt, everyone is certain
Why are you gay?

>>6675920
Then go harvest profit, boi

>>6675856
janny needs his sleep

>>6675899
it was good enough in 2022, anything after that lost expressiveness and added awkwardness that wasn't present before.

if he used AI as a reference and painted 2021 manually to achieve 2022 it I will say it's a good use of AI, I can see it's clearly hand painted and that's actually good.

2023 is just over-rendered.

>>6676456
I only think 2023 is AI. The golden chain goes all weird and the left zipper turns green towards the bottom. If 2022 also is he were more thorough fixing that one up. Mayhaps the background is AI though (what happaned to those traffic lights)?
There's also more subtle inconsistencies in rendering and decision making in the 2023 one which I won't bring up because I know ngmi /ic/ is gonna act contarian about those since they won't be able to see them anyway.

>>6675696
This retards here cant even find out AI errors on image billow.
Look at the neckless thing having third chain and overall being noisy looking. left peck having a random shadow line out of no where too.
this is nothing but AI ran through image and prob just retouched.

>>6675696
the dead giveaway is the jacket.

>>6675899
what makes me kind of suspicious is the fact that the lampost on the background becomes something entirely different on the later two pics.

test

is the AI in the room right now, anon?

>>6675696
the photorealistic dog snout on the lower image really makes it clear that some furfags are just sick animal fuckers

>>6675920
>Lamp posts
>necklace
>Grain
Etc. There's a lot of hints that it's run through an AI. Like how people were amazed at AI advancement in December but slowly got used to the "AI" look humans will eventually be able to discern which is ai and which isn't. The point here is this. No matter how advance AI gets, humans will always look for the human touch. That's why painting never died off.

Humans are shit anon but god damn are we resilient. Doomers saying that this will kill art are fooling themselves.

>>6676607
Yes.

>>6675696

>>6677016

>>6677241
cope

>>6677244
utter projection. I have nothing to cope about.

>>6675696
Yes. Who draws a chain like that? Who draws lamp posts like that? Tell this furfag to kill himself

>>6677246
utter cope. I have nothing to project.

>>6677256
You sure? You're the one who has all the reason to cope because you have everything to lose.

>>6677263
You certain? You’re the one who has all the reason to project because you have nothing to gain.

>>6677265
You're right. I have nothing to gain. I just like fucking with you fags for continuing to enable these AI threads. You fags couldn't be preached to, literally no better than ni/g/gers.

>>6677288
And in the end, you turned out to be the biggest faggot of all!

>>6677300
bad form, anon

>>6677288
>in the end, he only fucked with himself
nice try

>>6677288
read back what you wrote and try to honestly tell yourself you're not the fag. you can't!

>>6675696
How hard was for him to make small strokes with a brush that would look like a fur, that he had to use AI and fuck the rest up.

>>6677265
based retard
i enjoy it when anons give no fucks and start posting equally retarded garbage as the shitposter stirring up shit

>>6677246

He showed that the method is not accurate.

>>6677374
>>6677374
some say the only way to win is to not play. but sometimes it’s fun to not give a fuck and make up your own game just to entertain yourself and a few other based anons who can stand above it all. somehow the nothing to gain remark got to him all the same.

>>6677386
Forgot to turn off your little signature there.
>namefags being cancerous
Big whoop

>>6677400
I put basil in the name field because the other anon put sage in all fields. l2herbs, retard. I saged that post and this one. kys

>>6677412
nice damage control there friend you are looking real smooth right now

>>6677241

Crop it. Certain resolution or if the images have text will confuse. Of course it's not 100% accurate but it would be wrong to dismiss the result. Use your eyes and use the detector as something extra. Don't use the result as it is.

>>6677400
>>6677428
embarrassing damage control there friend you are looking real smooth right now

>>6677452
oh, you're still angry I called you out

>>6677455
oh, you're still angry i called you out

>>6677455
>>6677458
you two should just kiss

>>6677241
>>6677376

????

>>6677241
AItard btfo

>>6675696
>Those creepy eyes peering through the glasses, despite the point of sunglasses is suppose to obscure them

It really is clear, perfectism AI does when it still fails at it makes it the most soulless thing possible. Like it's some kinda of "I'm so much better than you cope faggot but then I shit all over myself and spill my spaghetti drawing the right number of fingers or not melt separate objects together" that makes it just so damn apparent whenever you see AI. Human ary doesn't actively piss you off when you see it, unless it is clearly some poltard tier reaction for the lutz of course.

>>6675696
They both are

>>6677921
Idk about you, but this is what I got.

>>6677439
So you have to crop the image just to get the AI to work properly. That kinda proves my point, doesn't it.

>>6677341
Nah, I'll accept that I'm a fag. Just like how I accept that it's over for artists (job wise). Rayark got rid of most of their art team and they wont be the last. There wont be some Deus Ex Machina to come and fix any of this. Arguing with me isn't going to magically revert all the progress, maybe you'll think you won in the end or something, but you'll have to accept the reality, like I did, at some point.

>>6678433
who cares about rayark. they're resorting to that shit only because they're near bankrupt. AI trannies have no future.

>>6678433
>accept the reality before it has happened like I did
nah, I'm good.

>>6678439
Oh so you'll be fine in the art industry as long as you flock to a company that isn't sinking? Okay, that's fine. But, that's going to choke the demand of artistry jobs even more. Now instead of being able to go to any company you want and make shit for money, you make zero money and you have to hope that you can get accepted into a fortune 500 company with even higher than before competition. So essentially, yea it's over.

>>6678443
You don't need to be a time traveler to know where this is going. Most normies will hate AI at first, but then they'll warm up to it pretty quickly once they have fun using it. Then they'll defend it because in most peoples' eyes, art is worthless in modern society. Don't believe me? Let a normie use SD for a day, they'll start fawn over it because "OH MY GOD I CAN GENERATE AWESOME IMAGES NOW" and they'll defend the development of AI to the ends of the earth because it triggers dopamine responses inside their brains. This isn't even me defending AI at this point, this is me telling you how an overton windows shift works. Anyways fag, go on about how you owned me or something like that.

>>6675696
i rarely come to this board. The rest of 4chud loves ai art and considers it an own against trannies and leftists.

I came here to see what the general opinion is on ai art. Do people like it or hate it?

^ ai generated post

>>6678448
Lmao the pettiness of the failed artist has no limits.
Imagine spending your day like this instead of drawing, doom posting to retards will never fulfill you as much as getting good would had.

>>6678445
>You won't find a job!
>Okay maybe you will, but it's going to be really hard!
Lmao shut up faggot

>>6678492
AI art is built on stolen art, of course artists are gonna hate it

>>6678492
>The rest of 4chud
No they dont. /a/ and /v/ absolutely hate this garbage. Even the porn board rejects it when it leaves their containment thread

is sneed AI generated?

>>6678448
>You don't need to be a time traveler to know where this is going
a year a go AI fags were telling us that hands would be solved in a month, 12 months later that is still not the case even with control-net and depth maps. anti-AI sentiment is growing and you don't have to be a time traveler to know where this is going...
>Let a normie use SD for a day,
I don't know what kind of normies you've shown SD, how many of them continue to use it? where these "normies" cryptobros?

all normies I showed dalle2 had fun for an evening and never bothered to try it again. I showed them SD and after initially being impressed, they didn't care much once they found it didn't get what they asked for often(one example, flying tigers attacking ww2 fighter planes). it was novelty, but too much hassle getting specifics. sure AGI could theoretically do it, but that's still science fiction, we don't have an actual path to reach that yet, AI development needs paradigm shifts.

>>6678546
/a/ janny deletes any post against ai and keeps posts owning le paintpigs lol.

>>6678592
AI retardation like the ones that infest this board is deleted on spot and met with heavy resistance, its literally the most moderated board on this shithole.
To whom are you trying to falseflag?

>>6678592
jannies, jannies, I like jannies
>it's "I love jannies"
Keep it down

>>6678421

i smell bullshit

>>6675899
I dont get what the point of this is
He just drew over the same drawing every year or used ai on it
I thought the point of redrawing something was to draw the same thing but with new knowledge and changing things up

>>6678572
>a year a go AI fags were telling us that hands would be solved in a month, 12 months later that is still not the case even with control-net and depth maps. anti-AI sentiment is growing and you don't have to be a time traveler to know where this is going...
SD5 solved hands
>I don't know what kind of normies you've shown SD, how many of them continue to use it? where these "normies" cryptobros?
The "normies" I know found out about forks of SD and use them to generate animu shit. They now defend AI super hard and get pissy when you mention that someone may have used AI in their own artwork. Yes, I will agree it's a novelty even to them, but for them, that's enough of a reason to defend AI. Consequently, they're also the type of people that are mad that they can't draw and so that probably plays a part in their defense of AI. Also, they hate crypto and nfts.

>>6678508
Have fun in a job market where only the 1% will actually find jobs. You might as well pack up your bags and find employment in another field.

>>6678507
That post took me 5 minutes at most, I drew afterwards. Your point is retarded.

>>6678719
Try it for yourself bud. If you had eyes, you'd notice that >>6677921 cropped his version slightly just to game the result.

>>6679674
You have fucked with this one though AI fag. It's blurry and full of compression artefacts. Post the original instead why dont you.

>>6679683
That's literally the original. Does the cope run this hard?

>>6679684
Whatever you say.

>>6678448
Imagine all the drama all the normies will get into with this stuff. Getting assblasted when other normies aren't impressed with their prompts ("doesn't the computer do everything?") or because they werent interested in watching Ai generated movie #932456. Fighting with other normie proompt "engineers" about copying each other's proompts, or because someone reposted their generations without credit. Whining to their online hugbox because their shit isn't getting views without purchasing bots or that no one will buy their prints.

>>6679685
Let me explain to you in a concise manner why you are retarded.
If I compressed image, like >>6677921 did, that would give me his same result. right? However, when you run the image I posted just now through the algo, it gives a poor result.
Therefore, I didn't compress mine, because if I did, then you would get a better result instead of the result you get when your run it on your own. You are in what is called the first stage of grief. I was in it too last year, it's okay buddy, you'll accept it sometime down the line.

just needed some quick photoshop sharpen, last pic was blurred a lot

i don't even

>>6679698
Yea, it'll be fucking funny.

>>6679670
>SD5
Stable diffusion 5? Do you mean1.5? No ai image gen has solved hands. Maybe you get ok results in the most generic hands at the sides pose. But trying complex interactions, say, an image of someone braiding hair , nope.
>animu shit
Coombrain weebs are not normies

>>6679699
Of course I believe you. After all AI trannies are known for their honesty.

>>6678600
Unfortunately the AI retard is right. There's some rogue janny in /a/ that is pro AI.

>>6679705
>Stable diffusion 5? Do you mean1.5? No ai image gen has solved hands. Maybe you get ok results in the most generic hands at the sides pose. But trying complex interactions, say, an image of someone braiding hair , nope.
Sure, I'll concede that point. My concern is it won't be long until that is solved. Everyone here was saying the AI can't get that much better within the 6 months that SD was rapidly evolving. I'll say that looking at the most recent generations it's starting to reach diminishing returns. But how long will it be until someone comes along and changes that.
>Coombrain weebs are not normies
You must not be Gen Z then. Half the kids I went to school with were coombrain weebs. Even if they aren't most wouldn't pay for art if they can have it done freely. Normies don't care about quality.

>>6679714
GenZ don't have any money and definitely don't run businesses that need art. of course they won't pay for shit.