/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

sure, these always motivame me to study more

>>6657795
>Putting the "cute" in /cbsg/
Yeah, I'm thinking based. 5½

>>6657781
pro here

>>6657781
sure, some of these are silly srry

>>6657827
pro where?

>>6657828
>>6657795
You two are going to remain fives at the most until you start to include backgrounds with your figures in line with a vanishing point to make them feel more solid.

>>6657850
You’re right but I’m scared, time to hit the books I guess

Sure why not..

These are my favorite art pieces ive made this year. I want to dip my toes into comicbook making, but man is it overwhelming.

>>6657881
Smells like permaprecumbeggar coon slop level -1

>>6657864
undeniably beg but immense amounts of soul
keep at it friend

>>6657888
low int, i wanted to give higher but there are some glaring perspective issues (bottom right books, top right tableware), and figures are dynamic but inconsistent anatomy (top left womans arms).
definitely sovlmaxxed though, gmi
>>6657864
mid beg, no sense of scale in this image unfortunately (try applying more atmospheric perspective), but very high sovl. gmi.
>>6657828
low int high sovl, figures could loosen up a bit, shading needs the most work
>>6657795
child protection services/10

https://twitter.com/TaikikiPeach

>>6657864
>>6657888
>>6658009
high beg to almost low int
>>6657978
int

>>6657888
your figure drawing skills are /beg/, but your object drawing / vehicle drawing / composition is /int/.

>>6657781
Would love to know where I'm at - am I gmi?

>>6658031
low /int/

Some recent-ish stuff, rate me.

I'm curious

>>6658062
High /beg/ - but almost low /int/
I just don't think the art pieces you provided are all that appealing

>>6658200
13/18

I posted this too late in the previous thread so it didn't get any responses. This is work from the past two months. Last year, I posted my work and was told by many that I was high /beg/. I still consider myself high /beg/ because my fundamentals and anatomy knowledge are still severely lacking, and I find myself guessing what to do more often than not. Still though, I want to know where other people think I'm at, and what I can potentially improve on.

>>6658264
I would consider you high /beg/, near the ceiling and almost breaking through to the bottom of low /int/. Things that would be helpful to work on is grasping a better understanding of line art and line weight. The black and white Naruto stuff looks nice, but then you have stuff like the one with the moon and then your lineart goes all over the place in certain areas. Regardless, you clearly are working on lineart and you're doing a good job on rendering practice, keep going.

>>6657781
I am back

>>6658308
2004flashanimation/10

>>6658219
What do you think is required to make them more appealing?

>>6658396
You posted 4 pictures
>1girl in void x2
>unappealing smoking orc with big gross lips
>monster with no face

It's just not for me sorry
Maybe draw more dynamic poses, or characters interacting with backgrounds
As for monsters I feel you pose a lot of appeal by removing the facd

>>6658416
I had a stroke at the end there
*you lose a lot of appeal by removing the face

>>6658285
Thanks, anon. I'm still experimenting with a bunch of different pens and brushes, so my line art can be really inconsistent.

>>6657795
>traced
/beg/
stylization is badly done as well and your gesture sucks.
>>6657828
/beg/
cats don't look like that nor do they make seductive poses.
>>6657864
high /beg/, good concept and composition but the rendering is sorely lacking. use more value variation as well to help sell the depth and varied planes. and if you're going to have a low shot like that show us her panties.
>>6657888
/beg/
forms are lacking and often feel flat, especially on the top left 2
Anatomy also needs a lot of work, they have horrible noodle arms, and the left 2 have no excuses like the spirit does.
The board image would be good if you spent more time on it though.

>>6657978
studies aren't art, but good work, high /beg/, clothing needs work.
>>6658009
/beg/ fails to capture etna, upper body is too big, propoertions are bad, and what the fuck is going on with those broken legs.
>>6658031
/int, good overall but needs more variation. all your girls are in the same frontal perspective with very little pose variation. change things up more and make it more exciting,
>>6658062
high /beg/, i'm assuming the middle 2 were studies because their quality is much higher than the other 2. the right one is god awful and evokes a feeling of deviantart.
>>6658200
low /int/ looks like ashley and should have been a mouse.
>>6658206
mid-high /beg/, good control but
>anime dude head on a white bg
boring and unambitious.
>>6658264
high /beg/, top middle image is /int/, work on some facial anatomy a bit more. overall its good and nice variety.

>>6658442
>seductive pose
consider taking medication

>>6658442
pyw please

>>6658442
>high /beg/, i'm assuming the middle 2 were studies because their quality is much higher than the other 2. the right one is god awful and evokes a feeling of deviantart.
They had as much reference used as the other two, I just tried different techniques and stylistic goals with all of them.

>>6658442
>stylization is badly done as well and your gesture sucks.
how do i fix this? also what do you mean by ''bad stylization''. I only traced the boxes after i finished with the referenced one to know where i fucked up

>>6657889
WHAT WAS IT

>>6658442
>high /beg/, top middle image is /int/, work on some facial anatomy a bit more. overall its good and nice variety.
Thanks for the feedback. I still struggle with faces a lot, despite them being one of the things I've drawn the most of.

>>6658886
Blog?

>>6657781
I've drawn out of boredom for most of my life and have always been unsatisfied with my skill level. Where would you anons place me?

>>6658827
I was going to rate you and say the same thing as that anon. Your style is going to be divisive not only because its shotashit, but also because its really the epitome of a young teenage girl’s tumblr profile. Its kind of apalling in that regard, not because of your own inability, but because of the path you’re choosing to tread

I didn't finish, but r8 anyway. I'm bettin' on /lowint/

>>6659312
/prebeg/

>>6658886
/lowbeg/

>>6658264
/lowint/

>>6658206
/midbeg/

>>6658200
If it's from imagination, /midint/

>>6658062
/highbeg/

>>6658031
/lowint/

>>6657978
/mid2highint/
-use bigger brushes for background or otherwise abbreviate detail, it detracts from your figure
-get better with form, it's all pretty flat & clear you copied a photo.
-don't lift pics from art subreddits

>>6657888
/highbeg/

>>6657864
/midbeg/

>>6657795
detestable style but probably mid to high beg, maybe int but im so put off by the aura i cant be objective
>>6657828
low int
>>6657864
high beg to low int. I would need to see more work, probably of figures and faces. The landscape isn't sized well but the rendering and composition is soul
>>6657888
high beg to low int, anatomical errors are almost reading as stylistic which is helping
>>6658009
high beg
>>6658031
high beg low int, some of these are great, others not so much, hate the porn addict style, but you're doing it well
>>6658062
low to mid beg, quality varying a lot here
>>6658200
max soul beg, it's cute but the figure is terrible
>>6658206
style/10. Would need to see more work
>>6658264
hate some of the faces, but the figures have charm. Probably somewhere between high beg and low int
>>6658308
kill yourself
>>6658886
style/10, can't rate without more work.
>>6659312
permabeg
>>6659341
dogshit quality and ugly face but great values, int probably. dont know if this is a study or what
>>6659346
devoid of taste but likely int


really though anyone who didn't post a full image with a background and a complete render cant be rated adequately, you're almost all beg in that regard

>>6657781

>>6659340
damn the lack of asian jeans is truly a curse. I wanna go with a westaboo style, not tumblr style, tho.

>>6658886
hard to tell because of the style but it looks cool. i'd say int.

really enjoying the hrb
>>6657864
love it

Mostly recent stuff but a couple are about half a year old

>>6659363
>hate some of the faces, but the figures have charm. Probably somewhere between high beg and low int
Thanks. I get told a lot that my faces are usually the weakest parts of my drawings. What's making them look bad to you?

>>6659341
>>6659363
sorry, better copy of the image here.

jej .

Late last time...

>>6660644
PRO
PRO!
PRO
PRO!!
PRO
PRO!!!

>>6658009
high beg, but I suspect that you won't be there for long.
>>6658031
Low int. I think you're at a stage where you can get stuck very easily. Stay on top of those studies and continue to push yourself. Shock those art muscles.
>>6658062
mid beg. I like the fact that you are trying a bunch of different styles. I'd say just focus on a single style you like the most for a bit. You'll see that when you improve in one area, you improve in others as well.
>>6658264
low int.
>>6658886
Tough one, I'm thinking low-mid int. I like the road you're on.
>>6659312
beg
>>6659346
low int. Seriously work on making those faces more appealing if you're gonna continue down the nsfw route. Just rip a face style off an artist you like desu. The one you have now is /notgood/
>>6659365
I'm thinking low int
>>6660105
sovlful midbeg. Potential is there.
>>6660579
low int
>>6660630
Not a style for everybody but I personally dig it. Also reads nicely from thumbnail. Most likely mid to high int.
>>6660656
Disgusting, broken bones everywhere, yet kinda neato. low to mid int. Bonus points for putting some effort into the hands.
>>6660674
Nice linework. I'd recommend working on those things you don't feel like studying honestly, push through them even if you find it hard. Because at least from this image, it looks like you have settled at this particular skill level plateau when you can be much more with smart studying. Low int.
>>6660644
Man you are a slutty artist goddamn, between low and mid int. Her right arm is what has me on the fence. Her elbow looks like its at the middle of her bicep. Appealing stuff.

I've never been amazing at giving advice, so take what I say with a grain of salt.

>>6657850
thanks you anon, you inspired me to finally get out of my comfort zone and try what you said. Its very lame but its a first try and i actually had fun.

>>6660973
>no ankles
Go look at how the tibia and fibula cradle the talar (talus? Idk) bone. It's basically hinge like on a action figure, desu easiest joint to draw in a more advanced 'wedging and locking' way. Doing that for your forms is your next step anyway, so might as well investigate that

>>6661886
thanks, i though the ankle was hidden when you wear shoes

>>6661893
well the left shoe wouldn't hide it, usually shoes cut that low even have a little 'dip' for the ankle. and the right shoe is cut higher (they don't match in ur pic) and looks more like a high-top (which ankles are still visible through if it's a canvas material, like skate shoes are). But the way you drew it, it really just looks like the whole foot is just a cylindrical stump because we're looking at the leg from (mostly) the back. In this case, at the level of detail you're using, the way way to communicate "back of foot" not "cylinder stump" is to add in the ankle.

also a skateboarder would almost never have their foot turned inward that far, that's an extremely unlikely and awkward pose. Now I'm straight-up nitpicking because I used to skate, but IMO even people who didn't skate would see that something is 'wrong' subconsciously because they've never seen someone in that position on a skateboard.

>>6663089
thanks gonna keep it in mind for the next drawing. ngl i prioritized the dynamic pose over a realistic one, but i should have taken more time to fix it regardless