/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6592350

>>6592350
and anudda one

>>6592350
,

Anon consider the following pic because it's the useful thing your capable of contributing to the world

you are going to get tons of hate for this but dont pay attention to the cissies sister!!

>>6592350
>Your
As if you have anything meaningful to do with the creation process.
"Hey guys, I commissioned someone to draw Goku in supreme clothes, so that means that *I* made it!"

I don't consider this AI because it was a painting I did IRL trad and just img2img it.

>>6592362
if the gore ain't real might as contribute yourself to the data anon

>>6592367
on that topic, img2img is the only imo real applicable use of AI that a real artist could use. Otherwise its just promptlets gacha.

>>6592360
I really don't get this argument, I know people are fucking retarded but I can't believe they're that dumb.
It's like saying you didn't type your post because you used a keyboard and computer to delivery the message. You didn't draw that picture, your pencil did.

I love that Ai allows me to express myself

>>6592373
>>6592375
>>6592362
>>6592352
these are prob just the same to fa/g/s but quickly now get in.
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=HA1dVYyXc8Y

mai best ai tart

Ai sisters. Behold our battle flag.

>>6592353
>>6592352
>>6592350
HOLY SHIT, how do you event compete against that? An artist would need like 100 times longer and still be worse at it. Its unironically over. Get a factory job or something, anything but art.

Pack it up lads, we artists never stood a chance. Promtchads, I kneel.

>>6592373
really inciteful comment elf tits mcmegafag, as always do the needful
>its his 34049th gen
you'll make it in the prompting business one day

>>6592350

>>6592350
amazing

Reminder
AIfags tell people that ai will raise the standards for art and its gonna do away with degenerate work
but they mostly use it for porn
they tell rightwingers that AI is making leftists seethe
then turn around and tell leftists that its democratizing art
they tell artists that ai will help them
but are also telling corporations that they can fire artists
when corporations don't use AI they then get called out for getting in the way of "innovation"
AI shills talk about how easy making AI is
but then talk like prompting is something only a select people can do
they talk about how much they hate artists and how useless they are, but do everything to be included in artist circles

the ai shill has no loyalty, no beliefs, no toilets, only hatred and greed

>>6592373
It saddens me that some people actually thinks that.

>>6592373
right? I spend more time crafting a prompt and negative prompt than it takes an artist to draw a 1girl, I literally put in more work, and my work is translated by a machine into pixels. It's software translation. I'm using a "translator" to speak my creative voice.

>>6592607
love this

>>6592609
>>6592611
Are these master studies you did of old master AI artists? incredible accuracy.

>>6592611
>>6592609
Ahh... when AI wasn't evil. Good times.

>Thread up for 5+ hours and counting

Fucking jannies

>>6592604
>draw a 1girl
Lost

>>6592604
Oh my God, quit the bullshit.

I do some dabbling in Stable Diffusion once in a while(while also being an actual artist), and I can say you did fucking not take 4-8 hours making a single prompt and negative prompt.

AIfag's trying desperately to make it seem like typing keywords in is such a hard task.

>>6592666
It was only the first time I wrote a negative prompt it took that long, I reuse it. Sometimes it takes me hours to find a good LoRA to use, I count that as part of my "work time". much like an artist charges for time while looking for ref.

techbros won

>>6592373
You know the funny thing about ai arr. Is that it all has the same rendering quality, Stiff poses, same facial structure and details. And every single smuck tech uses it. There is no distinction. Its so derivative it hurts to look at lmfao

>>6592350

>>6592720
its gotten so bad you can tell someone is AI generated just by looking at the thumbnail.

>>6592747

>>6592749

>>6592751

Janny must be gargling a bun of Pajeet balls rightnow if these shitty threads still up and running.

>>6592752
>>6592751
>>6592749
>>6592747

All done by me btw

Pic related isn't

>>6592753

>>6592350
Reported.
Like a fucking cockroaches.

the absolute state of /ic/

>>6592373
I've used the technology, it's more like getting a free instant commission then making art, hence you didn't make it, I will concede the art is your's, but in the same way a fisher man who catches a fish now posses the fish and it belongs to them but they didn't make the fish from scratch. You threw a couple of words into the prompt box and then hoped you got something nice, if you didn't you just changed a few words or retried the same prompt. I have been to /sdg/, the way they describe promoting is more akin to playing a gacha game. Hence why some people get addicted.

The reason your post is your post is because you had 100% control over what you wrote, there was zero randomness to what you wrote and the end result didn't surprise you. A more accurate analogy is if you posted a few key words and then asked a chatbot like ChatGPT to write an Argument for you.

>>6592755
>the guy ordering pizza:
>these are all done by me btw

>>6592755
You never made anything in your entire life.

>>6592350

>https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Synthography

you fuckers trying real hard to be acknowledge as artist. you're not you will never be an artist but you can be one easily... with just pencil and paper.

>>6592763
You did make it, you just didn't draw it. Simple as.

>>6592773
lmao. if you like this shit, you might literally suffer from mental degeneration

>>6592774
He didn't make it nor did he draw it

>>6592765
My prompts = My creations

Simple as

>>6592771
Synthography is a cutting-edge art form that uses the power of language to control and direct generative models, resulting in stunning works of creative expression. In the hands of a skilled synthographer, language becomes a precise instrument of artistic creation, harnessing the limitless potential of machine learning to push the boundaries of what's possible. It's an exciting and innovative intersection of art and technology that's sure to captivate and inspire.
Synthsters rise up!

>>6592778
indeed. and trans women are women

>>6592779
>Synthography is a cutting-edge art form that uses the power of language to control and direct generative models, resulting in stunning works of creative expression. In the hands of a skilled synthographer, language becomes a precise instrument of artistic creation, harnessing the limitless potential of machine learning to push the boundaries of what's possible. It's an exciting and innovative intersection of art and technology that's sure to captivate and inspire.
sounds like generic corpo vomit, possibly generated with Shit GPT

>>6592782
>possibly generated with Shit GPT
;)

>stunning works of creative expression
>harnessing the limitless potential
>push the boundaries
>exciting and innovative

>>6592777
Then who made it?

>>6592790
Obviously the AI program.

>>6592790
machine learning software generated the image

>>6592791
>>6592792
I guess if you want to make an apple pie you have to first invent the universe.

>>6592790
The neural network who took your command and then used diffusion to create an image from random noise. it's called Stable diffusion, not stable prompt, the diffusion is the most important part of the technology. The technology is flexible automation, in that while it still needs human commands(for now), it doesn't need any manual actions by a human once the prompt is written. We should really be calling it Automated art then AI art.

>>6592323

>>6592793
If the only thing thing you did in the process was contributing the idea of the piece, you're more of a client to the AI rather than an artist of the piece.

Like fucking Christ, the jannies are in a coma with the amount of AI threads popping up lately

>>6592795
>>6592800
There's arguments to be made, but I think as the technology exists at the moment, it's sensible to say you made it when discussing an image you used the AI to generate. This is not a statement about effort or manual action, when I put a slice of bread in my toaster and toast comes out I say I made toast, not that I commisioned my toaster to make me breafast.

>>6592803
holy fucking cope

>>6592778
Nah,
Simple as.

rangeban india

Have you guys tried reporting and not replying?

>>6592814
Several times.

>>6592873
>Several times.
Let it be.

>>6592350
AI art isn’t art. This is a place for real art critique for real artists.

>>6592887
>This is a place for real art critique for real artists.
Show us your "real art". Compare with the "isn't art". Simple. Cherry pick all you want. Drive home your point.

>>6592776
That's the point.

>>6592891
AI art cannot be art. You might want to try /g/. This is a place for real artists and it’s not really a place to debate over generated images for NFTs.

>>6592897
>That's the point.
Aren't artists known for being a little crazy?
"When a mad man found some certain way to express his insanity in original way, he would get promoted to be called an Artist."

>>6592781
>>6592811

Cope all you want. These are MY original prompts. Your words aren't law, your words don't affect me because I'm not an insecure attention and approval seeking artpig with an inferiority complex

;>

Here's some more

>>6592918
Can you give catbox? do you have a place to see more of your work?

I having some good success combing styles with characters from a different artist.

I made this, turned out nicely I think

>>6592918
>I'm not approval seeking
you say that but come here everyday to bitch and spam the board

>>6592976
Not him, it's me. At least this past week because I saw no one was

Peak generative AI and peak art criticism. What a time to be alive.

>>6592980
It only took almost 2 decades for /ic/ to get what the board is for

R8

>>6592983
>It only took almost 2 decades for /ic/ to get what the board is for
Marginal improvement in anime porn?

>>6592983
IDK consider the following picture and /ic/ bumper when people tell you to fuck off to /g/

>>6592765
If it helps Ive just been reposting AI slop and claiming it was done by me this whole thread lmao.

>>6593055
keep them coming

>>6593055
>If it helps Ive just been reposting AI slop and claiming it was done by me this whole thread lmao.
Uh. we got the joke.

if you want to be taken serious as AI artist, always add the prompt you use to your artwork

I already see many people getting defensive and butthurt about showing their prompts like children.

jannies finally realized working for free isnt worth it

>>6593236
That's pretty cool.

>>6593243
thx. confession, I cheated and painted over it for a day while chatting. Original was really bad Stable image I generated on free app. Hey this is /ic/ I'm learning to paint. :)

>>6593442
nothing wrong with a little paintover, I do it sometimes too.

>>6593134

KEK

>>6593555
checked

>>6593604
>>>6593555
>checked
Czhecked

>>6592350

F

A

>>/g/

G

E

Stop posting this gay postmodern shit. Post sexy girls instead.

N

.E

R

A

L
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=gIqVQGPcB4A

>>6593753
no

.

,

'

:

,

..

',

'';

,,.

>>6592373
>I really don't get this argument
Then you are not very bright, are you? A keyboard is a tool, your hand does the typing, a pencil is a tool, your hand did the drawing, in both cases you had direct involvement and put in some work. Now, if AI is a tool, what was your contribution? The prompt? Doesn't that make you the CLIENT and not the artist?

This only proves the point that AI ""artists"" are so incompetent.

.,,,,.

....,

>>6593487
LMAO, The absolute state of talentless mongoloids who can't draw. You're all gonna be stuck prompting the same shit and getting the same shit. Even with this technology only real artists will prevail in the long run. Imagine "stealing prompts" Jesus Christ, so you guys also had to be spoonfed every meal? Can't do anything for yourselves? What a sorry bunch!

.,..

.

,

..

0.

0

..,.,

>>6592969
Ai bro, pls explain, I've always wanted a reference for how my two favorite artists would make a piece so I can cop the style.

,,..,,

,.,.,.,

,

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/tmHNxExVsJI

,.,

,.,.,.,

,.,...,

.
.
.

. ..,, .

,,.

,,...

.......
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=OdNjfOTdmkg&t=34s

I AM HAPPY BECAUSE EVERYONE LOVES ME

>>6592918
>'m not an insecure attention and approval seeking artpig with an inferiority complex
you're exactly that, but you're also fucking cringe. "my prompts" he said. just fucking kill yourself, the world's laughing at you

>>6592373
They really want gatekeep art and make it so that only THEY can produce beautiful art work. No one else

>>6594194
Lmao pick up a pencil fucking lazy discussing parasite

>>6592373
The irony in that first sentence of yours.
Keyboards, pencils, true neutral tools obey your will, absolutely, and do exactly what you direct them to do, no more, no less.
AI INTERPRETS your will, or more specifically, your desires. Every time you generate a new picture, that is not you "refining" your work, that's you rolling the dice and hoping it's closer to what you imagine that you want, where-as every time I draw, every stroke is exactly what it is I intend to do, everything is as I desired, and crafted. There is no gamble of a variance, there is me drawing. I can remember every tiny detail, because I put it there.
You and "your" generated image? You couldn't tell me what is on there beyond the words you typed to the actual creator to interpret. You couldn't tell me shit about that anime girl. You couldn't tell me how many eye lashes she has, or in what direction they cirl, or how long they are. You couldn't tell me how straight or wavy her hair is, how round her breasts, how many wrinkles on her shirt, none of that, because you did not create that, something else did.
You are a client, a customer, a consumer, I am a creator, an artist.

>>6593753
Coomer who can't even draw his own waifus spotted

Why is this thread still up?
>Go to google
>click images
>Search big breasts, anime girl, X character
>i made these images
That's basically AI art, what's the point of sharing this stuff?

>>6592350
I really hope this constant shitting up the board is just a fishing for umads and not people actually thinking this equates to actual art, because like history teaches everything that's done ironically starts getting taken straight when it spreads enough. And since you zooms are absolutely prone to eating up everything that the mass throws your way there's the risk of actual anti-art beliefs at some point
The only good part out of this is that current gen will have an extremely low number of artists, making our life a lot easier
So yeah op, keep using AI. Thanks

>>6594233
because you retards keep bumping it

>>6594238
Nah, the AI shills will not let it die, a jannie needs to delete it but guess what, they're not doing it

Guys, I wanted to post here, but I am a few technological leaps away from my masterpiece. I haven't created anything yet but have you seen how advanced Midjourney v5 is? Just one more version, one more tool and I will strat creating. I swear!

>>6593753
Damn, I want to suck on those armpit tumors

At this point I'm pretty sure the jannies are leaving AI stuff floating on the board just to piss us off

>>6593134
Because posting your prompt reveals how fucked up the prompter is. It’s like revealing how the sausage is made. They do it on their private discords but they have enough shame to avoid doing it in more public/normie spaces, because they know it’s fucking weird. They would rather have that mystique, rather than being seen as a person who merely did a hyper-autistic google search that looks like it was made by a Indian who has very little experience with a computer yet is also tech-obsessed

>>6593134
>AI artist
not a thing, stop validating that word kikery

>>6594315
>artist
not a thing, stop validating that word kikery
Here, fixed it, the word artist lost any meaning when a can of soup could become "art", last artists died out like 200 years ago

>>6594179
All I hear is an insecure artpig (YOU) projecting. Keep making art so I can feed my models. Jajajaja

>>6594335
coincidentally, AIniggers like yourself try to validate AI through this logic, and you appeal to dadaism being art all the time. So why do you act so revolted, when you are the kike. Worthless, unskilled normgroid non-artists like you try to push the idea that everything is art, not artists

>>6594335
holy COPE from the ainigger

>>6594341
While we're at it, was really "modern art" something that grew up spontaneously and became exploited by industries successively, or it was was actually groomed by the lobbies themselves to further extend the reach of the industrial revolution and rip away any trace of culture left in the population?
It's pretty paranoid, but looking at how things ended up you know. We live in a world where artist meant "fine craftsman" for millennials and then after rich people decided to build an economy on technology suddenly it changed meaning, and you have anyobe that's vaguely entertainment and creative related becoming an "artist"

>>6594347
*Millenias, not millennias

>>6594347
money laundering+devaluing actual fine art, that was the goal

>>6594349
Meaning that the success of modern art on the normies of the past was exclusively them glomping down what influencers told them was cool
So in a sense, you could take that AIshit is the legitimate art of the people. No skill, no depth, no appreciation of the humanity behind it. It's just the shallow product that the masses deserve and can understand

>>6594354
>normies
nah, normies find it repulsive, you have to indoctrinate yourself into accepting toilet seat. and it didn't stop people form appreciating the classics
> you could take that AIshit is the legitimate art of the people.
well it isn't art so the point is moot.

While you nigs keep squabbling, I'm gonna occasionally post some chicas.

>>6594394
Yes please.

>>6594394
Moar chicas. Less crabs.

>>6594403
Awooga.

How come only 1 in 100 gens are good?

>>6594436

>>6594436
Just like how only 1 in 100 sketches are good?

Have some coom shit as well

Donated $500 to stability ai last month. I want this technology to completely demolish artpigs.

Based cat anon.

>>6594454
Imagine being so fucking mad at people that draws better than you to type this kind of shit
People is not going to stop drawing shit even if nukes drop you fucking down syndrome niggers, the only thing you're destroying is your own consoom cuck ass, but you're too fucking retarded to understand
Go keep posting this fucking abominations, have fun
Ten years from now you're going to bite your fucking thumbs off for the regret of how hard you fucked yourself in the ass

>>6594489
Lmao there is no end to your copes. Cry harder faggot

>>6594494
Still doesn't change that without the AI, you're absolutely nothing.

Artists can still use their skills on a napkin and pen. Even on MS paint AIcels can't do shit.

>>6594507
I don't work in the art industry you coping dimwit. I'm a relatively wealthy IT infrastructure consultant who just wants to see you all crash and burn. Once again, keep seething, crying and COPING cause I will keep funding AI projects.

>>6594494
You really don't fucking get it eh

>>6594525
>who just wants to see you all crash and burn.
OMFG JUST HOW FUCKING ASSBLASTED ARE YOU FUCKING NIGGER SHIT

>>6594529
It's his way of coping being a failed artist. leave him be.

Cats and Dogs
By H. P. Lovecraft

Naturally, one’s preference in the matter of cats and dogs depends wholly upon one’s temperament and point of view. The dog would appear to me to be the favourite of superficial, sentimental, emotional, and democratic people—people who feel rather than think, who attach importance to mankind and the popular conventional emotions of the simple, and who find their greatest consolation in the fawning and dependent attachments of a gregarious society. Such people live in a limited world of imagination; accepting uncritically the values of common folklore, and always preferring to have their naive beliefs, feelings, and prejudices tickled, rather than to enjoy a purely aesthetic and philosophic pleasure arising from discrimination, contemplation, and the recognition of austere absolute beauty. This is not to say that the cheaper emotions do not also reside in the average cat-lover’s love of cats, but merely to point out that in ailurophily there exists a basis of true aestheticism which kynophily does not possess.

>>6594536
>By H. P. Lovecraft
Uh... really?

The real lover of cats is one who demands a clearer adjustment to the universe than ordinary household platitudes provide; one who refuses to swallow the sentimental notion that all good people love dogs, children, and horses while all bad people dislike and are disliked by such. He is unwilling to set up himself and his cruder feelings as a measure of universal values, or to allow shallow ethical notions to warp his judgment. In a word, he had rather admire and respect than effuse and dote; and does not fall into the fallacy that pointless sociability and friendliness, or slavering devotion and obedience, constitute anything intrinsically admirable or exalted. Dog-lovers base their whole case on these commonplace, servile, and plebeian qualities, and amusingly judge the intelligence of a pet by its degree of conformity to their own wishes. Catlovers escape this delusion, repudiate the idea that cringing subservience and sidling companionship to man are supreme merits, and stand free to worship aristocratic independence, self-respect, and individual personality joined to extreme grace and beauty as typified by the cool, lithe, cynical, and unconquered lord of the housetops.

>>6594535
You'll all be failed "artists" soon.

.

Persons of commonplace ideas—unimaginative worthy burghers who are satisfied with the daily round of things and who subscribe to the popular credo of sentimental values—will always be dog-lovers. To them nothing will ever be more important than themselves and their own more primitive feelings, and they will never cease to esteem and glorify the fellow-animal who best typifies these. Such persons are submerged in the vortex of Oriental idealism and abasement which ruined classic civilisation in the Dark Ages, and live in a bleak world of abstract sentimental values wherein the mawkish illusions of meekness, devotion, gentleness, brotherhood, and whining humility are magnified into supreme virtues, and a whole false ethic and philosophy erected on the timid reactions of the flexor system of muscles.

,,

This heritage, ironically foisted on us when Roman politics raised the faith of a whipped and broken people to supremacy in the later empire, has naturally kept a strong hold over the weak and the sentimentally thoughtless; and perhaps reached its culmination in the insipid nineteenth century, when people were wont to praise dogs “because they are so human” (as if humanity were any valid standard of merit!), and honest Edwin Landseer painted hundreds of smug Fidoes and Carlos and Rovers with all the anthropoid triviality, pettiness, and “cuteness” of eminent Victorians.

..

But amidst this chaos of intellectual and emotional grovelling a few free souls have always stood out for the old civilised realities which mediaevalism eclipsed—the stern classic loyalty to truth, strength, and beauty given by a clear mind and uncowed spirit to the full-living Western Aryan confronted by Nature’s majesty, loveliness, and aloofness. This is the virile aesthetic and ethic of the extensor muscles—the bold, buoyant, assertive beliefs and preferences of proud, dominant, unbroken, and unterrified conquerors, hunters, and warriors—and it has small use for the shams and whimperings of the brotherly, affection-slobbering peacemaker and cringer and sentimentalist. Beauty and sufficiency—twin qualities of the cosmos itself—are the gods of this aristocratic and pagan type; to the worshipper of such eternal things the supreme virtue will not be found in lowliness, attachment, obedience, and emotional messiness.

>>6594535
I want to see how many buzzwords his "relatively wealthy IT consultant" pathetic lying ass can fit in a single post
Just how epically assobliterated you have to be to do shit like this?
I've never witnessed such a landscape of pure bawwing

,,,,,

>>6594543
Somebody's pissy about being filtered by Loomis

This sort of worshipper will look for that which best embodies the loveliness of the stars and the worlds and the forests and the seas and the sunsets, and which best acts out the blandness, lordliness, accuracy, self-sufficiency, cruelty, independence, and contemptuous and capricious impersonality of all-governing Nature. Beauty—coolness—aloofness—philosophic repose—self-sufficiency—untamed mastery—where else can we find these things incarnated with even half the perfection and completeness that mark their incarnation in the peerless and softly gliding cat, which performs its mysterious orbit with the relentless and unobtrusive certainty of a planet in infinity?

That dogs are dear to the unimaginative peasant-burgher whilst cats appeal to the sensitive poet-aristocrat-philosopher will be clear in a moment when we reflect on the matter of biological association. Practical plebeian folk judge a thing only by its immediate touch, taste, and smell; while more delicate types form their estimates from the linked images and ideas which the object calls up in their minds. Now when dogs and cats are considered, the stolid churl sees only the two animals before him, and bases his favour on their relative capacity to pander to his sloppy, unformed ideas of ethics and friendship and flattering subservience. On the other hand the gentleman and thinker sees each in all its natural affiliations, and cannot fail to notice that in the great symmetries of organic life dogs fall in with slovenly wolves and foxes and jackals and coyotes and dingoes and painted hyaenas, whilst cats walk proudly with the jungle’s lords, and own the haughty lion, the sinuous leopard, the regal tiger, and the shapely panther and jaguar as their kin.

>>6594543
Artist were always "failures" and shunned by society.
Only your butthurt no draw ass thought otherwise.

>>6594555
What does it mean to be a failed artist?

Dogs are the hieroglyphs of blind emotion, inferiority, servile attachment, and gregariousness—the attributes of commonplace, stupidly passionate, and intellectually and imaginatively undeveloped men. Cats are the runes of beauty, invincibility, wonder, pride, freedom, coldness, self-sufficiency, and dainty individuality—the qualities of sensitive, enlightened, mentally developed, pagan, cynical, poetic, philosophic, dispassionate, reserved, independent, Nietzschean, unbroken, civilised, master-class men. The dog is a peasant and the cat is a gentleman.

>>6594563
look in the mirror

>>6594543
Holy what a badass
Got poopy in panty waah
Now I'll have to use chatgpt to steal his work too to take my autistic revenge!

With the small difference, you know, that chatgpt can actually steal whatever code monkey shit you pretend big brains call a job.
Uh-oh!

>>6594562
Big truth fucking finally.

There goes the bumping

>>6594568
he can just do trad IT when computers do all the computer jobs.

>>6594567
But I don't feel like a failure, what does it mean to you?

>>6594563
It means being an artist
POST MORE JUNK NIGGER
LET ME SEE HOW MAD YOU ARE
SPRAY MY FACE WITH THE BOILING CRIMSON TEARS THAT COME OUT OF YOUR PATHETIC ANUS YOU WONDERFUL RETARD!!!!

>>6592350

>>6594575
That you're an actual failure, just like everyone that doesn't feel like he's a failure but can't accomplish anything

>>6594576
>>6594579
Noted, thank you.

>>6592350

the fact that this trash thread is still up says something about the jannies...

Mods sticky this thread

>>6594568
>>6594555
>>6594529

>>6594595
>Op_got_told_pyw.jpg