/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6590699
No.

>>6590699
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6OCH_iD7LYk

the future looks so exciting!

>>6590709
> how to draw landscape <-
> how to create original characters <-
> how to animate original characters <-
> how to render opal cars <-
ok, guess we can close /ic/

>>6590699
Future? I have modelscope doing this right now and it's hilarious.

>>6590709
>Create a realistic human
>Creates hideous goblin looking man thing
Riiight...

The Facial capture is nice though. I've heard a few artist actually preach how we should all be learning Unreal Engine regardless of our interest in game development. While I admit it has interesting features for 3D artists and animators, I'm not really seeing anything that would interest a 2D artist in any way.

>>6590699
>adapt or die

>>6591995
Hey, this is still incredibly impressive compared to what we had 5 years ago!

> I'm not really seeing anything that would interest a 2D artist in any way.
There's a Marco Bucci video @youtube where he shows how to use Blender for 2D painting. Guess you could find uses for having vast amount of realistic 3D models

>>6592010
The techbro elites will be screaming "adapt or die" at the starving masses after they've automated every career in existence and bought up all the land

>>6592051
did you guys saw the newest Adam Duff vid? He and (half of) his comment section are screaming "ADAPT OR DIE !!!!!".
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sZbtNPzq7YE&t=221s&ab_channel=AdamDuffLUCIDPIXUL

>>6592059
I tried posting the video, retards kept reporting for being off topic. Stay safe

>>6592059
Not surprising. Coming from them it's just cope. They either know it's over deep down or they actually think they'll be the lucky ones who get to stay in the industry to proompt and clean up picture shitter turds for zillions of dollars.

>>6592068
"Against the power of Sauron, there can be no victory. We must join with him, Gandalf. We must join with Sauron. It would be wise my friend"

>>6592068
i bet they will prooompting in their "art"-mentorships lol

>>6592077
Imagine
>get a mentorship or internship with industry "artist"
>watch them type "Greg Rutowski, 8k, beautiful young girl, anime style, masterpiece"
>stare at computer while it loads the generations
>import to photoshop to polish the turds
>class over
Once they all start losing their jobs this will be their next sad hustle. Teaching proompting classes like it's some sort of industry secret.

>>6590699
The future is now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=6dtSqhYhcrs

>>6592089
watch /ic/ evolve from concept art, anime to now ai

>>6592085
no shit, this is their current plan.

>>6592089
>the future is stockfootage
>hyper realistic, 4k CGI
>we've been rated a 8/10 by (insert company) here with a budget of (insert amount)
>guest staring (insert celebrity)
>review written in and scored in 5mins after movie release
>movie is 1hr long
>the future is now sir...

>>6592089
we won

>>6592098
I'm mean what would 3d and CGI be considered if /ic/ didn't evolve to that in the first place

>>6592098
So it will become deviantart

>>6592089
Interesting that the picture ratio is cell phone format. That's how I figured it would evolve. People won't even bother making feature-length movies and the medium will all be reduced to short form content to appeal to people with tik tok attention spans. I think purely ai filmmaking will have a lot of hurdles to overcome for full length movies so they will push short films like this instead to compensate, so it goes hand in hand with the attention span thing.

>>6592109
>we

AI has become increasingly prevalent in our daily lives, revolutionizing many industries and shaping the way we interact with technology. One area where AI has gained traction is in the realm of art, with algorithms now capable of creating paintings, sculptures, music, and even poetry. While this development may seem exciting and novel, it raises complex questions about the role of technology in the creative process and its impact on human creativity.

At its core, art is a deeply personal and emotional expression of human experience. It is a reflection of our thoughts, feelings, and values, and often serves as a means of connecting with others and communicating ideas. The act of creating art is a process that involves not just technical skill, but also intuition, imagination, and emotion. It is the unique perspective and individuality of the artist that gives art its value and significance.

However, the emergence of AI-created art poses a threat to this human element of creativity. While AI algorithms are becoming increasingly sophisticated, they lack the consciousness, intuition, and emotional depth of human beings. AI-generated art is often algorithmically optimized to appeal to popular tastes, which can result in formulaic, generic, and predictable output that lacks the emotional depth and meaning of traditional art forms.

Moreover, the use of AI in art raises ethical concerns around ownership and authorship. If an AI algorithm creates a piece of art that is similar to an existing work, who owns the copyright? Can an algorithm be considered a "creator" of original content, or is it simply a tool used by humans to facilitate the creative process? These are complex legal and ethical questions that have yet to be fully resolved.

>>6592123
Furthermore, the use of AI in art creation risks perpetuating existing inequalities and biases. AI algorithms are trained on large datasets that reflect the biases and preferences of their creators, which can result in AI-generated art that perpetuates and reinforces these biases. This creates a feedback loop in which the biases of the algorithm are reflected back into society, perpetuating existing inequalities.

Additionally, the emergence of AI-generated art could create a false sense of novelty and innovation in the art world. By focusing on the technical aspects of creation rather than the emotional and personal aspects, AI-generated art could lead to a homogenization of artistic expression, resulting in a generic and predictable output that lacks the nuance and individuality of traditional art forms.

Despite these concerns, some proponents of AI-generated art argue that it represents a new frontier in the creative process, expanding the possibilities of what art can be and allowing for new forms of artistic expression. AI-generated art has already been used in a variety of contexts, from creating digital art installations to generating unique soundscapes for virtual reality experiences.

Furthermore, the use of AI in art creation has the potential to democratize the creation process, making it more accessible to a wider audience. AI algorithms can be used to generate art in real-time, allowing for more interactive and participatory art experiences. This could allow for new forms of artistic collaboration and community-building, as artists and non-artists alike contribute to the creation process.

>>6592089
If this wasn't pushed by the algorithm because it has AI in the title no one would care.
Every day that passes this tech becomes more and more underwhelming. After months of shitposting and viral marketing we have a bad anime and stock photo generator.
What a joke.

>>6592125
However, the potential benefits of AI-generated art must be weighed against the potential risks and drawbacks. While AI-generated art may provide new forms of creative expression, it also risks displacing traditional artists and creating a false sense of novelty and innovation. Furthermore, the ethical concerns around ownership and authorship must be addressed in order to ensure that artists are properly credited for their work.

In conclusion, the emergence of AI-generated art poses a significant challenge to traditional art forms, raising complex questions about the role of technology in the creative process and its impact on human creativity. While AI-generated art may provide new forms of artistic expression, it also risks perpetuating existing biases and inequalities, and creating a homogenized and predictable output that lacks the nuance and individuality of traditional art forms. Therefore, it is crucial that we approach the use of AI in art creation with caution and skepticism, ensuring that the use of these technologies does not undermine the core values of artistic expression and individuality.

>>6592128
As AI-generated art continues to evolve and become more sophisticated, it is essential that we have ongoing conversations about its implications for the art world and society as a whole. By engaging in these discussions, we can ensure that the use of AI in art creation is guided by ethical principles and that it remains a tool for facilitating human creativity, rather than replacing it.

Ultimately, the use of AI in art creation is a reflection of the ongoing dialogue between technology and society, and it is up to us to ensure that this dialogue remains guided by the values of creativity, diversity, and individuality. We must be mindful of the potential risks and drawbacks of AI-generated art, while also recognizing the potential benefits that it can offer. Only by striking a balance between these competing factors can we ensure that the use of AI in art creation serves the greater good and contributes to a more diverse, innovative, and expressive art world.

How is my anti AI argument I worked with chatgpt?

>>6592010
>"I WILL learn top secret proompting skills and keep my industry job!
>"companies WILL pay me to make art from Ai references instead of using the Ai output itself!"
>"I'm the one in control!"

>>6592160
Adam is a fucking pussy. Fuck him.

>>6592160
holy amounts of cope

>>6592129
I rather work just listening to music then your retarded word search and image generators
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=lkzU1T0vINU
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=n8-G3vBScco
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xH9g-DT7hPU

>>6592160
>i´m in the control!

>>6590710
The principles of reality always correlate to your outlook unless you need to kill for nutrition. Ive been drawing for almost 9 years

>>6592166
>>6592168
>>6592203
They posted several tldr comments leading up to that one. I can picture tears streaming down their face as they typed it all out.

>>6592237
This must be written by ChatGPT. No one is this delusional.

How does it feel that, years and countless hours of drawing studies, practice, and maybe even accredited higher education is about be meaningless and/or complete change in the way we create art in the next decade?

Sorry for the demoralization but it is a serious question.

>>6592237
we WILL be able use AI as tools for art, WHEN tech bros, investors, pajeets, tech startup hypefags and scammers get the fuck out that is.

first we cleanse the conversation from anyone that can't hold a fucking pencil, then we can figure out the ethics, the workflow, compensation, attribution, that sort of thing.

we simply don't let people that never did art before to dictate the future work ethics and workflows of artists.

>>6592250
Dangerously based

>>6592247
You'd know the answer to that question if you weren't a no-draw ic faggot

>>6592250
>we WILL be able use AI as tools for art, WHEN tech bros, investors, pajeets, tech startup hypefags and scammers get the fuck out that is.
I want to know who or what is being scammed? This isn't like NFTs or crypto where it was a clear get rich quick scheme from the get go. Yeah I get there's faggots trying to sell prompts and other stupid shit, but most of what I see is just people hyping up the novelty of AI art. I mean you can't be surprised that people be it artists or non-artists are playing around with AI art and trying to push the limits.

>we simply don't let people that never did art before to dictate the future work ethics and workflows of artists.
Buddy your in for a rude awaking in the next few years, the market does not give two shits about workflows and honestly even ethics. Efficiency and the ability of a product to meet a demand or need is what the unfortunate hard cold truth is.

AI or not artists should have the advantage because a good artist should have the Aesthetic knowledge and most importantly experience that the average Joe doesn't have. tl;dr you know what is slop and not slop and what is in demand and not.

>>6592237
>3d animation making 2d animators almost obsolete
he's so full of shit.

>>6592258
>I want to know who or what is being scammed? This isn't like NFTs or crypto where it was a clear get rich quick scheme from the get go.
Playing dumb I see

>>6592258
your picture is slop, all your arguments are therefore disregarded

>>6592262
last I checked the models themselves baring a few were opensource, are you referring to people using AI art and claiming its not?

>>6592237
>Adam is so bloody right as well!
this is adam sock puppeting right?

>>6592258
Individual consumers may not. But companies are fucking scared of using the technology precisely because of the copyrighted material present in the datasets. If it's so good right now, Why is no corporation interested in using these tools for their output?

>B-but Disney is using it already
They're using AI with their own material. Nothing wrong with that

>This isn't like NFTs or crypto where it was a clear get rich quick scheme from the get go
I think he meant the technology being overselled to oblivion to investors. It's not faggots selling prompts but CEOs who want to get as much value as they can before the entire thing gets copyright striked

Where is Indias Genshin Impact and MAPAA studio? Shouldn’t they be leading the entertainment world by storm by now? It’s been over a year now what’s the hold up?

>>6592292
Just you wait for 3D generators. Two more weeks I swear (Two more weeks for a code generator too, just need to scrape more)

>>6592288
> It's not faggots selling prompts but CEOs who want to get as much value as they can before the entire thing gets copyright striked
>He still believes ML/AI has copyrighted images in the models/weights.
That's cute, it really shows the tech literacy in the art community these days.

>>6592299
>He doesnt know

>>6592299
> This post is brought to you by SHUTTHETKSHRTOHCK and GERTTTY IMAMAGES

>>6592299
>LALALALALALA If I ignore it its not illegal!

>>6592299
https://twitter.com/mfrankDude/status/1631829512391647233
It's over AIbros...

>>6592250
I have no intention of using them, but
>we simply don't let people that never did art before to dictate the future work ethics and workflows of artists.
is absolutely something I agree with. People who've never drawn or really created anything on their own coming in and trying to dictate acceptable behavior in existing communities to which they've never contributed is infuriating. When artists find out somebody traced their work, they're well within their right to call them out, but AIfags show up and insist that if somebody img2img's your work, you just have to shut up and take it because it's "AI" which suddenly makes it OK for some reason.

>>6592322
>muh ethics
The idea that it is unethical to copy is the antithesis of art.

>>6592383
Why do AI scammers pretend to care about art? lmao

>>6592383
you do realize that still will be under the umbrella of replica right

>>6592387
Why do commie artists pretend to care about intellectual property all the sudden?

>>6592383
Humans replicating artstyles? No problemo. Machines replicating artstyles? No es bueno. What the fuck about it is it hard to understand?

I make a couple hundred each week selling prompts :)

Gotta say, I really love AI Art.

>>6592402
Yes because machine have no right. Are you fucking retarded?

>>6592404
>He's not selling courses on how to make the absolute best prompts with SD
ngmi bro. Up your hustle you can make thousands weekly with just one course bro. protip: just use greg rutkowski everytime bro

>>6592404
Wow is that in rupees

>>6592412
Not a bad idea, I probably could.
Thanks, looking into this.
Prompting really is an art, so it makes perfect sense to charge people for a longer experience.

>>6592416
Pure USD my dude

>>6592402
Techjeets data scrapping 2d artists? No problemo. Techjeets data scrapping musicians with legions of lawyers behind them? No es bueno.

>>6592418
Bro I got a really cool idea bro! What if we try to get hired at dreamworks using training data from disney bro. We'll be making bajillions in no time bro. Imagine the rupees I mean dollarinos bro

>>6592418
Oh wow what a gigachad. Where can I donate to your patreon to help with your art.

>>6592418
Do you accept NFTs my friend?

I love these impotent "sarcastic" responses.

God, the cope is delicious.
The creation of images has been democratized.
Problem?

>>6592089
i have seen this movie already 500 million times

why is the sudden turbo aijeet spamming lately? Did they have nothing to do because AI took their jorb?

>>6592431
Yeah thank god. People weren't allowed to create things before 2022 and it was a dark time

>>6592431
you are a bot tho

>>6592435
they realized their shilling is fruitless because everyone thinks AI is ugly as shit so now they have a hate-boner for artists actually developing a skill

>>6592435
this has been going on for months already

>>6592434
Same here, I can't stop looking away it's mindblowing how AI developed from last year to now

Whew! Prompting sure is a hard job! I can't believe I generated 100,000 thousand frames for my personal cute girls doing action anime project "Zepod" using MAPPA and UFOtable's training data today. This will surely get a lot of attention and money! I sure hope nobody else has the same idea as me and Mappa and Ufotable does not come after me. After all, fair use right?

>>6592440
I peed my pants in excitement a bit. Then I came. I can't wait to bring my ideas to life and create more positive representation for transwomen.

>>6592450
Unironically bro

my favorite is the "all I've seen is /sdg/ tier shit so that's all it's capable of" cope

like handing pencils out to kindergartners and saying "see? it only does stick figures, worthless"

>>6592402
>>6592383
NOOOOO YOU CAN'T USE A COMPUTER TO REPLICATE MY STYLE THAT'S THE SAME AS THEFT!!! REEEE

I started using hentai screencaps for AI a few months ago, just sharing it here if anyone want some free money I got tired and dont want someone reporting my ass for plagiarizing some old ass hentai

>>6592452
wow great argument fagtron you sure are convincing everyone wiith your hot opinions.

go back to your cemetery at /sdg/

>>6592089
No images were made with AI in this.

The future is now

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7vQM4pRqg5c

>>6592085
This is what ever other single profession on earth has become. I guess it's illustration's turn.

>>6592128
Stable diffusion in the workflow? Now my employees can crank out a six animes at once instead of focusing on one!

>>6592511
each anime will have a sixth of the marketing/reach?

>>6592494
I love the NPC comment section in these videos. People are dumb to an impressive, awesome degree.

any abuse of a tool, system or loophole invites heavy-handed legislation. ai fags are like low-impulse individuals who were handed a gun and get surprised their wanton use of it has repercussions

>>6592128
I can practically sense this text was created by ChatGpt it has a distinct style when it writes an essay,

>>6592258
>I want to know who or what is being scammed? This isn't like NFTs or crypto where it was a clear get rich quick scheme from the get go.
AI “art” is more of a “Get SKINNY in ONE WEEK with this ONE SIMPLE TRICK” or “LEARN NEW LANGUAGE in ONE MONTH with this ONE SIMPLE TRICK” type of scam, I think.
>BE MASTER ARTIST in INSTANT with this one simple tool! we bet people WILL treat you and your AI generated pictures REAL SERIOUS and not just brush them off as quickly churned out slop!

>>6592735
There will be scammers in any field, even art. Look at fiverr watercolor art

>>6592919
neck yourself for bumping

>>6592634
lmao this is my favorite cope
like some people really live in this kind of delusion

>>6592678
Obviously it is. It produces text which reads like a middle schooler following one of those essay outline worksheets.

>>6592919
Actually, I think we'll see scams/misinformation on a whole new scale (No, not just political shit). Think of IPs having astroturfed fanbases with botted followings and AI generated art to supplement and maintain a facade. Like imagine a new fully functional and acceptable quality gacha game creating "fanbases" out of thin air just to create a sense of FOMO. Just enough socmed knowledge and effort required

>>6593996
It will definitely be pushed to continue the general mental and emotional decay, just like constant race/gender-based demoralization, by way of forcing you to always question whether or not something/somebody is even real.

>>6593985
>ainigger bumps thread to no one's surprise
>cope
shouldn't have abused it and gloated like a nigger. now it's radioactive on the commercial side. all because of a hate bonner for people who put some effort in a practice

>>6594007
This so fucking much. I don't know why people aren't talking more about this. I think this will be the worst effect of all.

>>6594007
>>6594330
On the bright side, future alzheimer's care could include an "internet" from the patient's past, providing a lot of comfort.

>>6594339
Sounds more like torture to me

>>6594330
It's already happening. Considering how Tiktok and Meta algorithms are designed to keep you hooked to their platforms, advance it far enough and you can have the ultimate hyper-personalized generative entertainment machine.

>>6594352
And the moment they have the normies hooked on AI normies will defend this shit to death, as normies do.
Fuck everything. Uncle Ted is right again and again.

>>6594352
>>6594362
maybe you should kill yourselves then?

>>6594369
Nah, on the other hand I might actually be compelled to be one with the real world despite my introversion. Plenty fair to assume the internet will just kill itself at some point