/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

sure

>>6550401
And, Time!

8:07? Bleh.Too many details and subtle colors.

>>6550401
high beg

okay

>>6550401
>>6550415
>>6550419
>>6550424
>>6550430
High /pro/

>>6550415
High beg except dean looks real good

>>6550419
Finish it

>>6550430
Not much to go off of, mid beg?

Alright

I drew this with my finger on a phone.

>>6550415
I think highish beg

>>6550430
Mid beg

>>6550449
Int, i like the style

>>6550464
Mid beg

>>6550401

>>6550401

>>6550477
Very low int

>>6550449
High beg

>>6550475
Mid beg

>>6550464
>>6550483
>>6550508
Low beg

>>6550483
There's a huge dissonance between the shakily outlined character colored flat, and the wild textured brush strokes of the grass. You should try to unify your render a little more thoroughly. Don't be afraid to go crazy with human figures.

>>6550415
mid beg

>>6550430
beg

>>6550449
high beg

>>6550475
beg

>>6550477
low int

>>6550483
low beg

>>6550564
low int

>>6550559
>shakily-outlined
To be frank, I did the whole pose from imagination... pretty much started on a whim and worked my way from there.

>unify your render
You mean add more texture to the figure? I think I was told that once and that pic was *after* adding texture to it... I admittedly was afraid to paint over the linework.

>>6550415
Mid beg

>>6550449
High beg

>>6550477
Mid int

>>6550483
Low beg

>>6550564
High beg

Just some album art. Going to post some music soon

>>6550564
Hightier stuff rad.

>>6550475
love your stuff m/int/y

>>6550596
low int

>>6550564
high beg

>>6550477
mid int

>>6550449
split between mid/high int
You've got really great linework, would love to see more of your stuff

Sure. My ratings are very subjective though.

>beg
>>6550419
>>6550604

>high beg
>>6550464
>>6550483
>>6550687

>int
>>6550415
>>6550430
>>6550475
>>6550477
>>6550508
>>6550596
>>6550603
>>6550711


>high int
>>6550449
>>6550564
>>6550758

>>6550475
145kTwitterfollowers$6675patreonbux a monthLatinAmericanluxurylifestylehighbeg. Extremely based and gmi.

People who don't rate others' work are scum, but people who post their own work without rating others are worse than scum.

>>6550921
meant for
>>6550903

>>6550940
cant do much when im posting from work lil bro, do you expect me to rate every artwork here?. There are too many already.

pyw and ill rate you when I get back home.

>>6550415
Low int

>>6550430
High beg

>>6550449
Low int

>>6550464
High beg

>>6550475
Mid int

>>6550483
Mid beg

>>6550564
Mid int

>>6550603
Low int

>>6550415
Mid Int
>>6550419
High beg (maybe you deserve better, but the aesthetic leaves much to be desired, so I can’t tell if you have solid fundamentals or it’s so vague that it doesn’t matter)
>>6550430
Low int
>>6550449
High int
>>6550464
High beg
>>6550475
High beg
>>6550477
Low pro
>>6550483
Mid beg, hour reach exceeds your grasp but you’re getting there.
>>6550508
Low nig
>>6550564
Permaprebeg
>>6550603
Int
>>6550604
Shit
>>6550687
High int, I think you’ve got all the right stuff in place but there’s a wish washy quality to the work (which I’m sure you went for) that just keeps it from feeling solid and truly competent.

>>6550965
>low nig

Come on anon give me an actual rating

>>6550608
Thanks. It’s nice for someone around here to not hate everything I do.

>>6550967
You have to draw coom or anime girls atleast to get an actual rating

>>6550983
Okay

>>6550985
Low begnigger

>>6550987
>:(

>>6550401

High Pro!

>>6550415

I like your art, its very cute!

Mid Int?

>>6550430

Mid Int?

tell me I'm a beginner.

>>6551078
Permabeg
>>6550967
Lol. Your work is pretty good. Well, >>6550985 was kind of hideous but it showed you could perspective and you’ve got solid hatching skills and grasp of anatomy. Solid int.

>>6550965
>there’s a wish washy quality to the work (which I’m sure you went for) that just keeps it from feeling solid and truly competent.
is it because of the blue trees?

>>6551154
blue trees are ok
needs darker shadows

>>6551175
Makes sense, thank you

>>6550882
Int
>>6550603
Beg

r8 me plis

Been working on this.

>>6551263
Beg

>>6550415
high beg, poses too stiff and anatomy is total jank.

>>6550430
maybe int, not enough to go off

>>6550449
low int, nice style very 3d, let me see your rendering skills.

>>6550464
maybe beg, not enough to go off

>>6550475
high beg, weird symbol drawn tummy and bad color theory.

>>6550477
maybe int, not enough to go off

>>6550483
mid beg, he looks like he's laying on top of a painting + proportions are odd

>>6550508
maybe beg, where the fuck are his ears?

>>6550564
stick to drawing furry mommies and you'll move past beg

>>6550596
maybe beg, not enough to go off

>>6550603
maybe beg, not enough to go off

>>6550687
about to break beg barrier, i like those colors but it feels like you're skimping on detail to hide a lack of understanding of perspective/anatomy

>>6550711
very low int, please work on your colors

>>6550758
mid int, those hands on the dude are WEIRD man

>>6550882
low int, very 3d nice rendering, look into readability and composition (what is that torso?)

>>6550903
mid beg, that face is weird and everything just looks kinda flat.

>>6550970
not enough, at all, to go off

>>6550985
low beg, what are those arms kek

>>6551078
maybe beg, not enough to go off

>>6551263
studies are not rateable

>>6551265
maybe int, not enough to go off.

>>6551270
most accurate ratings so far

>>6551385
if by accurate you mean ranking them and then underrate them at least a tier, sure.

>>6551470
Suck my assfaggot

rkgk

>>6551470
Bro, high /int/ would mean that your work is comparable with industry-standard concept art. It's called "pro" for a reason.

>>6551528
Mid beg

>>6551534
funniest man alive

>>6551528
no, high int is near low /pro/ level. Is more about style and consistency that skill alone that lands you a job. Also what the fuck are those hands? my pre /beg/ ass could paint better ones.

>>6551470
Who is under rated?

haven't been here in like a year

>>6551543
>crabbing perfectly good hands
Kek, pyh.
No such thing as high pro or low pro, if you're pro you just are. low/mid/high is incredibly subjective at that level.

>>6551712
I agree I think adv better term instead of pro cause some people get job even if they not good technical skill wise.

im convinced this board is full of underage b& because the last time i personally used the scale low beg/ high int was over a fucking decade ago and it was when we were a bunch of shitkids on an animation forum.

all in, its not that big of a deal and i can see why youre doing it but the idea of "im finally out of beg!" is pure NGMI and once youre actually seeing massive improvements youre going to stop being so fuckin stupid about your self assessments as if youre still in school being graded

>t. pic related

>>6551596
Body int/pro
Hands leave something to be desired. Blog?

I should do a better compilation, this is my twitter banner

Im honestly not sure what you people mean by int anymore l i got to figure drawing session with 70 year old boomers who have been drawing their whole loves and they can’t draw as well as some of the “ints” in this thread…. Are ic’s standards too high? Idk

>>6551785
It’s just simple fun. One day I’ll be pro and it’ll be nice to come here and give tips to young/old artists.
>>6551833
No, the level of industry artist have gotten much higher. So skill levels are rated lower. Kinda like some sort of skill inflation.
>>6551802
Int. The anatomy on some of these is too stout.

Why is the overall skill level in this board so fucking low on average? Literally nothing in this thread is better than low int at best except for >>6550449

>>6551863
Oh, also forgot to mention
>>6551494
>>6550882
>>6550596
>>6550477
Are pretty nice too, even tho the second one needs better draftmanship for it to be truly good.

>>6551867
>Int
>>6550596
Nigga what?
>>6551596
>>6551265
>>6551078
>>6550758
>>6550711
>>6550564
Are all much better.

The last thing I drew.

>>6550401
ARRRRT

>>6551893
>ugly generic attempt at studies/generic concept art that belongs in a /beg/ thread
If that's /int/ the what is pic related?

>>6551906
Tho >>6550758 is pretty good, I'll give you that

>>6551906
Idk what is it
I like it though

>>6551078
Okay you're a beginner, but are you content with that role? Are you willing to go through trials and tribulations to succeed¿ I doubt it

>>6551863
>Literally nothing in this thread is better than low int at best except for >>6550449
That's low int though

>>6551899
I hope it's not gonna be literally your last, that's good work!

>>6551270
> very low int, please work on your colors
If you can paint over? I’m not sure where to go from this.

>>6551792
oh wow high praise, thank u anon
be warned my blog is has a lot of coom lol
@Deegen_ on twitter

Hands still give me some issues, haven't studied em in ~4ish months.. gotta get on that sometime

>>6551893
there's not really an objective way to rate art so ppl r gonna rate/get rated w a lot of personal preference

>Generic generic generic
Faggot just because you don't like the subject matter doesn't mean those pieces aren't still better. Anatomy, linework, and coloring are all skills being shown and they're better than-
6550596
Your beg work is much more simple and has weaker anatomy/stylization.
>>6551906
Int. And it doesn't change that 6550596 is still beg.

>>6551940
>personal preference
Rating someone low because you don't like the subject matter of their art means you're a damn retard. You can dislike a piece and still be able to view the work objectively. Anon is just being a faggot.

>>6551946
>You can dislike a piece and still be able to view the work objectively
I agree, was just saying y the ratings can differ a lot from person to person on the same art piece

>>6550401

>>6551954
I'm fine with them differing, but you can't then shit talk other anon's works while saying something that doesn't match your own critiques is better than others. A study isn't a good indicator of certain skills (creativity), but it is a good indicator of rendering. Studys take skill. Begs can't make good studys. Nor can they mix and mash their study like
>>6551596
The concept art is more creative than single girl on blank background which both
>>6551265
>>6550596
do, yet the first one shows more skills than the second.
>>6551962
Beg.

>>6551967
>>6551962
that ones was a bit simpler, also i forgot to draw the guys thumb when holding the gun, here's a more interesting piece

>>6551970
Beg. Proportions and anatomy is off. His face is freakish unless that's what you're aiming for. Fun subject but beg execution.

>>6551978
for me the biggest L was the hands being fuck huge, but i only noticed after inking the outline, this one has better hands although the head and the shoes are a bit big

>>6551970
>>6551982
Good imagination anon. Keep that while improving your drawing skills and youll make some neat art.

take 2

>>6551990
Int piece. I was the one ragging on you for not actually finishing the hatching on this. Be sure not to slack off anon.

I’d give some ratings if I were more experienced

>>6550401
been doing studies from movies

>>6551935
use ai for paintover

>>6551270
>let me see your rendering skills
Lol I didn’t post anything rendered cause I think my renderings still a little behind my linework, I’m working on that

>>6551990
Easy int, nice to look at

>>6551970
>>6551982

I love these, anon, Especially the second one. Your faces and lines could use some work but otherwise, it's great. I like the face in the first one. I'd rate you somewhere between mid/high int

>>6552088
No, lmao.

>>6552098
Low int

pt 1
>>6550415
kinda bland. nothing striking
>>6550419
still noob. if this is your best you have alot of work ahead. try actually finishing something.
>>6550430
flashy colors, bad linework looks like your trying force being sketchy.
>>6550449
good but where is the color? feels kinda generic. take a break from fanart and learn something abt design you have a lot of potential.
>>6550464
unfinished and flat
>>6550475
no one is impressed with how you draw something that is like facebook clickbait crap. this makes me uncomfortable because its super cartoony NG type art but has weird realistic details that detract from the full peice. figure out what makes something good and erotic not gross edgy teen art.
>>6550477
mid if studies pro if from imagination.
>>6550483
super flat looks ok at first but the longer you look the worse it gets. get some perspective going on it will help immensely
>>6550508
good hatching but try to avoid using lines like on the eyes, hatch those with the same detail you used on the hair.
>>6550564
what the flip
>>6550596
really lacking confidence in the line the shading doesnt work and feels like you did it just to do it.
>>6550603
boring study keep it in your sketchbook. do 100 and then come back.
>>6550604
this is just like ripping off a dozen different flash youtubers
>>6550687
color and design is very striking. the shape and from is lacking. the tiles cuting off the pattern so soon screams lazy. theres good bones but you shouldn't have signed this so soon
>>6550711
u have some skills but your perspective in relation to color and shading is missing. the head completely blends into the wing and forms akward tangents. learn some about composition. also the inconsistency with the resolution of brushstrokes is really akward.
>>6550758
this is like a salvia fever dream its so fucking weird but well done thats all.
>>6550882
these are decent design feels abit generic in tone and color like they could fit into any mecha fantasy anime

>>6552142
>>6550758
I wonder If I should've clarified that this was a commission or not but thanks anon

pt2 skipped some trolls or i had nothing to say
>>6550903
its ok but kinda boring
>>6551078
instagram like bait
>>6551263
highschool study u must b 18 to post here.
>>6551265
face feels really stiff eye perspective is off chromatic abrasion is so 2015
>>6551494
excelent very cute
>>6551520
this niggas been dead for like 600 years
>>6551596
well done but the subject is disturbing
>>6551785
belongs on the side of a hispanic mans motorbike.
>>6551802
i feel like your racist.
>>6551899
was it also the first?
>>6551901
shit photo.
>>6551906
this will get you alot of likes on twitter and an inbox full of depraved commision requests.
>>6551931
dope
>>6551962
this isnt awful but it feels like something i'd draw in highschool
>>6552085
i feel like posting well done studies is like showing off kicking a ball into an empty net with the best kicks but when the game time comes its a no show. its great tho
>>6552098
all the fundies are there but there is no motion or weight its just very stiff and everything else being good makes the stiffness stand out more.

>>6552142
>>>6550564
>what the flip
Is that good or bad?

>>6552149
>i feel like posting well done studies is like showing off kicking a ball into an empty net with the best kicks but when the game time comes its a no show. its great tho
This is true
However, it's the only way I can get myself to actually finish semi-finish something and I wanted to post a piece here.

I'm the same faggot from >>6550882
>>6551867
>Are pretty nice too, even tho the second one needs better draftmanship for it to be truly good.
Can you elaborate? thanks btw.

Please rate this, as is my first proper attempt of painting.

>beg
>>6552085
>>6552032
>>6551940

>high beg
>>6551970
>>6551962


>low int
>>6552098
>>6552102 (lineart is int though)
>>6551990
>>6551906


>int
>>6551982

you love to see it

I would post my art but I don't want to look too good for this thread

>>6554011
Pro

Does it not feel cringey posting your art in this thread?

>>6554098
pyw and I might tell you...

>>6554098
why would it be cringy?
it just for fun

>well done but the subject is disturbing
mission accomplished:D

>>6551967
I agree I agree
but alas ppl will always rate differently cuz art isn't objective

>the first one shows more skills than the second
I'm curious, what makes the first more skilled than the second in yr opinion?

>>6553925
>beg
oof, any critique?

also w yr work I think yr shapes r defined pretty well but I'm having trouble telling what's actually going on

>>6554010
spooky
v cool, nice colours too

>>6554011
do it for the (you)s

>>6553925
>oof, any critique?
Assuming you are the Theoden fag. The face itself is ok, but looks like you gave up with the hair altogether.

> I'm having trouble telling what's actually going on
dont blame you, my reference has a lot of motion blur on the lower side.

>>6554169
I'm retarded, meant to reply to >>6554161

Guys, sorry for the off-topic question. Do you see the artist's PayPal profile picture when you pay via PayPal invoice?

>>6554176
Here's my trash btw

>>6554169

oh I should've specified im >>6551940

>>6554176
Yes

>>6553925
It’s a nice painting. Some details aren’t as dark as they should be. But I believe you got the overall feel down. You managed to bring out the glowing eye well too.

>>6554215
Try defining more your shapes, why the background is more sharp than your main subject?

>>6552149
yes it seems the markers I use give off a sheen that fucks up lighting in pictures. the only way to get a real opinion of yours is to mail it to you, please email me at insonkall@gmail . com and we'll figure out something

>>6552142
like?
>>6550965
rude
>>6550882
ok!

>>6551802
pretty cool, i agree with the other anon on your anatomy, try varying your faces/expressions a bit more too

>>6554169
>but looks like you gave up with the hair altogether
If I finished the hair what would you rate my level at?

>>6554616
low int

Self portrait

recent thing done for a request

>>6552102
int
>>6552098
int
>>6551935
low int/high beg
>>6551906
low /int/
>>6551802
high /beg/
>>6551265
/int/
>>6551263
mid /beg/
>>6551078
you're a /beg/ /int/

>>6550415
9
>>6550419
5
>>6550430
6
>>6550446
10
>>6550449
75
>>6550464
16
>>6550475
14
>>6550477
64
>>6550483
7
>>6550508
13
>>6550564
28
>>6550596
31
>>6550603
17
>>6550604
9
>>6550687
18
>>6550711
14
>>6550758
18
>>6550882
20
>>6550903
12
>>6550970
16
>>6550985
15
>>6551078
26

>>6555279
Continuation

>>6551263
9
>>6551265
17
>>6551494
19
>>6551520
84
>>6551528
54
>>6551596
22
>>6551785
19
>>6551802
16
>>6551899
3
>>6551901
5
>>6551906
26
>>6551931
7
>>6551940
13
>>6551962
6
>>6551970
12
>>6551982
12
>>6551990
16
>>6552032
5
>>6552085
10
>>6552098
18
>>6552102
78
>>6553925
18
>>6554010
25
>>6554161
5
>>6554181
11
>>6554471
10
>>6554970
8
>>6555242
15
>>6555244
16
>>6555278
18

>>6550401
tl;dr of this thread is, if you want to be rated int you have to color and shade your artwork.

>>6555281
No shit retard. You come here to flex muscle.

>>6555288
don't act high and mighty faggot. Troon freak.

i'm low beg, and here's 30min of loomis eyes

>>6555244
>>6555279
mid beg

>>6555289
rent free, obsessed, etc, etc

>>6555280
are you by any chance retarded, anon?

>>6555279
>>6555280
Ages? ratings out of 100? years before we get good? what the fuck do the numbers mean, Mason? you people making your own rating system really grind my gears, I tell you what

>>6555490
54

>>6555676
share the model?

Got done with this organic power armor thing today. Kinda wonder if I went too far with the glossy look tho.

here we go, my most recent one

some of my recent ones + some commissions. ill take any advice/crit , ty.

>>6555540
int
parts in hatching do not follow the form
is it intentionall? imo lowers the quality
>>6555906
low int
too far with gloss tho it fits asthetically
learn rendering and take it to the next level
>>6556031
low int
tho borring basic perspective
>>6556079
pro passing
shadows somewhat dull
>>6556512
highbeg
blure, glow, sparkly effects lower the quality imo like cheap spray painting sold street art
paint the effect yourself else its tacky

>>6551906
Nice shapes. High int

>>6556079
I like the composition, i'd rate it high /int/ if it had a background.

my last 3 finished things

these are all subjective maybe im totally wrong
>>6550415
low int off top right only
>>6550430
mid beg(?)
>>6550449
int
>>6550477
really hard to tell off this alone w/ nothing taken further, but at least high beg(?)
>>6550508
high beg
>>6550596
high beg(?) its mostly the shoulders here killing it for me
>>6550603
>>6551990
mid beg, good study subject though. do peter han dynamic sketching if you haven't/aren't. 2nd one is better, high beg(?) even
>>6550758
int
>>6550882
low int, anatomy on right is a bit ridiculous, also are you shading with black?
>>6551263
mid beg but subject matter will take you further than 90% of this board
>>6551265
high beg where are your edges? watch bobby chiu interviews craig mullin pt. 7
>>6551802
int(?) but i implore you to stop shading with black and do more figure/drapery studies. idk copy some sargents
>>6551935
low int, you have too many colors, too many poorly integrated effects/textures, too many soft edges, painting with black, ? lighting doesnt make sense, pencil thin rimlights. that being said the fact you can render out an entire scene puts you above 90%+ of /ic/. watch swatches. if you have a portfolio send it into wildblue studios twitch streams. read muddy colors.
>>6552085
int
>>6552098
low(?) int but for what its trying to be, maybe just int flat
>>6555242
high beg(?) but honestly its enough for this case imo
>>6555244
high beg/low int, but honestly it just looks a tiny bit stiff/flat you just need to work out
>>6555279
int but i genuinely cant tell what your numbers mean
>>6555540
int, love it actually
>>6555906
low int. i usually hate soft brush + shading w/ black but its decent here. read scott robertson maybe
>>6556031
high beg(?). but its works for what it is and itll improve with time so
>>6556079
int, "pro" even, could pass for WoTC material imo. do you have a portfolio?
>>6556512
high beg/ low int. lay off the soft brushes, textures, effects a little

please kill me

>>6556700
and the last 3 studies i did
krenz cushart study -> richard schmid study -> photostudy of bird
all about 120m each

>>6556725

>>6556700
>low int, anatomy on right is a bit ridiculous
Ok, whatever...
>also are you shading with black?
Maybe you should not be rating others people works yet...

Finished this one yesterday

Pretty proud of it although the AK is kinda huge

>>6557002
by adding shadows with only one very deep value you flatten out vibrancy and introduce muddiness through wrong values and temperatures
you need to pick the actual tone the shadow is separately and use that instead of trying to paint transparently over your midtone
>>6553925
>>6554169
you have this exact problem here, you autopiloted into the deep saturated blue you use everywhere else when this time the image actually uses pure black for its shadow areas, and your image has a very obvious blue cast that is entirely the wrong color temperature compared to the neutral or slightly warm original

again this is my subjective opinion and youre free to paint however you like

>>6557002
>high /beg/ with a lot of ego

>>6555676
the eyes are wrong
>>6556705
hi minus8, love your work, stay away from the kids please

I spent an hour copying this from a photo

>>6557223
Low int, pelvis rotation doesn't match rotation of torso below belly button, facial features are formless

>>6556728
Int, inconsistent light source/ basically directional pillow shading

>>6556707
Int, try some more construction

>>6556705
High int/low pro. Hard to judge, post something with more time invested

>>6556700
You gotta get a gf and draw her from life a lot for a year and you'll be real good. Could also go to sessions with a model if you have those nearby, but would be faster with gf.

>>6557223
Soul. Your biggest problem right now is proportions though, generally speaking shorter torsos and longer extremities make people look taller which is great when you're talking about soldiers.

>>6553925
Good sir, you are the best here
I really love this painting, I'm gonna use it as refrence

I tried again, but I think my skill level comes through about the same.

You didn’t like my ostrich self portrait so have a beheaded old man

>>6550419
I recognize that krita brush.

What can you say about this so far?

>>6559851
looks like you rely too much on the smooth line tool.

>>6557497
blow me, crab

>>6557491
Except you are wrong in your assumption I jkust used dark blue for shading in the first picture. About the robot, well, I like my colors.

>>6559873
Shouldn’t you go shill your art in that other thread?

>>6558238
getting a gf sounds incredibly difficult to me

>>6559917
>don't be fat
> put some effort into exercising 3x/wk
> have a job, any job so you can buy her dinner & occasional flowers
> eat pussy
> don't be entitled about sex
> focus on asking her stuff and listening in order to determine if your basic wants/goals for the next 6 moths align.

Seriously the last one is KEY. Do it well and sex follows. But focus on intimacy not sex.

Also dinners don't have to be super pricey, I'm talking chipotle-tier 1-3x /wk

If you're in college, "I'll buy you Chipotle 3x/week for intimacy" is a winning bio and will get you laid if you have hygiene and can keep your mouth shut about sperg stuff.

>>6560049
I'm just saying this sounds harder than painting more apples not that I need advice, but I appreciate it

Just finished this one, been on a role lately pumped as shit to draw,it's 4 in the morning where im at

>>6556700
low int - lacking overall pose/gesture flow, need to study more anatomy/ use more references
>>6556725
>>6556728
high beg
>>6557223
low int - forms feel kinda goopy to me for what should be a badass scene otherwise
>>6558238
>>6558645
possibly high int? - seems like you know what you're doing based off face shading, but the ear looks kinda fugged. maybe the model has one of those lame large earlobe piercings. she has the proportions of a starving african teen
>>6559227
beg - observe more, coom less
>>6560208
high beg - same issue as the skull guy sketch. put as much effort into those pants and the face as you do for the arms. overall needs more depth to sell the pose

I'm curious what you guys think, never really considered a level before. More whether I'm happy with what I've made or not. In this one I think the colours and perspective are kind of meh, but overall I'm pretty happy with it.

I've been getting back into drawing after a long hiatus. The orange haired one is for my own stuff while the others are for the OC thread, the dragon riders are a first quick attempt and failure and the second is an attempt to actually do something.
Sorry about the low quality, I quickly just scaled them down.

>>6560256
>beg - observe more, coom less
any tips for accomplishing this?

>>6561214
Take references and look at them

>>6551528
who cares high int means nothing. people are handing out low pros like water bottles

>>6561214
draw only men, it worked for me

>>6561214
not that anon but you honestly shouldnt even be doing human bodies at this stage, noone tells /beg/ this but human bodies / faces are some of the most difficult subjects
your brain is hardwired to recognize human anatomy as a course of evolution and reject even small discrepancies subconsciously
for the stage where you are literally just learning to see accurately you should start with extremely simple subject matter
in rough ascending order of difficulty:
random rough rocks -> random tree roots -> fruits -> bottles, jars -> plants, flowers -> bugs -> birds -> mammals -> dogs/cats -> humans
you might be thinking "this sounds incredibly fucking boring and banal", but it works.

watch this, digest and absorb what he is saying: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=22XYoenU-0c
pirate a pdf of bert dodson keys to drawing, do the exercises
pirate a pdf of peter han dynamic bible and the dynamic sketching video course and follow it

>>6551528
>>6551543
>>6561223
the pill is that concept art has nothing to do with "skill" past a mid-/int/ level
none of your art is going to be seen or touched by anyone except asset artists and isn't public facing at all (unless it gets shoved in an artbook to pad out page count)
what you are actually doing is churning out dozens after dozens of variations and breakdowns of the most mundane, inane shit like barrels or crates or huts or something.
An int knows how to draw a barrel. the difference between him an a entry level concept artist is the concept artist knows how to come up with like,
36 different versions of a fucking barrel that all look different, then do cutaways and orthos and show every detail for 3D modellers, texturers, etc. to come in and turn them into game assets
They can take direction and advice from their ADs, they can deliver consistent quality at a fast speed
its variations, thumbnails, breakdowns, orthographics, etc all the mundane actually useful industry shit that people don't do for "fun"

>>6551935
>>6556700
Thank you. Also int.

>>6561190
All int except bottom left.

>>6554161
First one displays more skills.
Rendering shading drawing. It’s more effort than a B&W sketch on a background. The anatomy on them are booth stylized, but the second one clearly doesn’t understand anatomy and shades in random places. As well as the funky collarbone. See >>6555540
This is using hatching better.

>>6561132
>sovl

got three: two traditional

>>6562017

>>6562017
and one digital

this took me around 9-12 hours. How much harder is to paint cute animu girls?

My best piece thus far desu

>>6562724
Way better than the last shit you posted. Have your mid /int/ rating then faggot

>>6556725
low beg

>>6556728
Grandmaster VI

idk really what criteria to judge by but honest opinions
>>6562027
>low int
>>6562724
>mid to high int
>>6562785
>high beg
>>6562982
>pro
>>6562989
>pro
>>6561190
>low to mid int
>>6560208
>beg
looks a bit stiff and perspective is off. The left hand's fingers are kinda fucked up too. Keep up the work though.

im a level 1 beg

i started doing a quick figure drawing, got frustrated at my inability to do correct proportions, and immolated it out of rage

I had wanted to draw something for my parent's anniversary and would think I need to start today for it to be ready in time. Problem is that I'm a /beg/ and don't know if I'm ready quite yet. Pic related is what I'm currently working on. It rough with just over 2h30m of time put into it, but I would be doing this other drawing in black and white. Based on my two other previous WIP drawings which can be found at >>6561578 and >>6563374, am I decent enough to do something for them?

>>6564169
you are always ready and good enough to draw/paint something for ur parents

Sorry if the quality is shitty, I made the collage on my phone at work

is there one fucking person on this board that has a unique fucking style or are you all just fucking copycats?
>inb4 post work
too big of a following to post here and ruin everything because i have to a "nice fucking fruitcake" personality for insta

>>6564399
You're a copy cat too. Tell me your influences.

>>6564330
Some are better than others but /int/.

>>6550401
Lens distortion. Lol.

>>6564399
Wtf are you looking for, asshole? You want something so singular that it defies description among a bunch of people learning to draw? Are you always such a pretentious faggot?

>>6552149
what does being racist or not has to do with his skill level u dumb faggot ?

>>6564399
you are unique anon, you are special exactly like your mom says

>>6564399
most people here are young and starting out... you are too, and no the content you shit out on insta isn't art.

>>6562989
Int. Mouth and the gun hand

jojo.

>>6564944
pose

a study of a slovak ig model

An Ugly Knight (you) tries to propose to an Elf Queen (your sister), and fails horribly..

Abaddon, the destroyer of the bottemless pit.

Annyoing Girl (your sister) creeps out Blind Old Man (your grandpa).

Idk what's been happening rn but i got an artistic second wind and want to draw/can like a motherfucker recently, just this week i got 4 done and that was unthinkable for me before, really enjoying it

>>6565457
thats awesome. I like that drawing, you should add a "No Skateboarding" sign behind him lol maybe he just cut it in half and its falling.

>>6564959
I would sex this character anon. Int. Post him in CBSG. And keep posting him.

>>6564959
where did you learn how to draw clothes

>>6555906
Neat design, though the armor glare effects are a bit much here. My advice would be to use that effect on just one part of the armor. On the shoulder would be pretty striking, also try experimenting woth different textures when blending your colors. Shading with black works here since its not too oppressive on the bright teal/cyan but using a textured brush would help make it pop!

I learned a lot from this dudes vids, very inspiring stuff

https://youtu.be/Fbo6ZAuF914

>>6564944
beg cuz u cant make a fucking collage of drawings in one post

All the begs rating me as a beg, but all the ints rating me as an int or even higher tier… interesting

>>6566713
Who the hell are you?

>>6566969
>>6550882

>>6566978
Lying bitch

>>6566992
Ignore, wasn’t me

>>6566969
Im not telling you so you can crab me even more you thug

>>6550401
Here

rate? or is this board dead.

>>6567303
0, finish it cuck.

>>6555279
I'm sorry but what the fuck are those Igor ass hands.

My latest work

>>6564330
/int/

>>6567374

high beg-low int. if it was just line art it'd be just mid beg-high beg, but the shading and coloring saves it.

work on your anatomy (muscles and how to place them properly) and your head structure (she has no jaw), also your ear placement but that goes along with head structure.

Also, some parts of the hair defy gravity (the front bangs infront of the forehead)

The hands are solid, the coloring is also solid. Other than, all good. 6.5/10 (apply the critiques i gave and it can be 8-9/10)

ill also post my work so you know im not a troll or a crab

>>6550401
why does it still say lever

>>6568261
/pro/
You made it bro, you can just kill yourself now and rest easy knowing you fucking made it.

>>6568268
I'm not killing myself until 2026.
But why are you so hostile toward me, anyway? I don't know who you are, but I don't think I have ever wronged you in any way. Many desire for me to kill myself, but none tell me why.

>>6568268
you rlly think thaqts rpo? no offense to the artist, but thats just wrong. its cool though, just not pro.

>>6568325
Obviously he doesn't actually mean it; he's just making fun of me. But I don't know for what reason.

>>6568325
nowhere near pro kek, mid /beg/ at best

>>6568261
Mid /beg/ looks muddy.

I’ve been trying to do a digital pencil style for a while. I’m the most proud of this piece.

>>6569007
That looks very cool

>>6562724
that's really cool, I wish I could draw mech things

>>6563512
hah I like this, pen drawings are awesome

>>6569077
/ic/ of all places should be able to draw mechs better than any other art community with how many years most of you faggots have been obsessed with drawing boxes and fundies; Which is what mech drawing basically is. Retards here will say they can't do mecha but start off with their human figure by drawing a robotic-ass base sketch

>>6551982
cool af, but face and shoes look horrible

aight

>>6569129
Neat the scar thing on the face is confusing
>>6569073
Neat the backwards knees hoof feet is confusing
>>6569007
Neat I like all the ugly face lines and stuff
>>6568481
Neat put more detail into noses maybe
>>6568261
Neat do more contrast maybe
>>6567394
Neat perfect as is ready to print
>>6567374
Neat maybe the nose should be the same line thickness as the outline of the Face idk
>>6567135
Neat I have no idea what I’m looking at
>>6564963
Neat those faces are emoting

And so on

>>6569007
Life has been hard on Mcgruff the Crime dog.

>>6550508
garbage

>>6561190
Femoid
>>6562027
Man
>>6562724
/M/an
>>6562785
Man
>>6562787
Slav
>>6562982
Man
>>6562989
Man
>>6563444
Femoid
>>6563512
Chad
>>6563523
Underage boy
>>6564169
Man
>>6564330
Ugly ass fujo
>>6565457
Man
>>6565850
Man
>>6567135
Underage boy
>>6567374
Man
>>6567394
Femoid
>>6568261
Schizo
>>6568481
W*man
>>6569007
Cool guy would have a drink with
>>6569073
Not human
>>6569129
Tranny
>>6569165
Dude

>>6569501
Right on point.

>>6565851
look at them