/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

is AI any good at facial expressions?

>>6549688
Idk, but it can replicate Ilya-san pretty good.

>>6549688
AI can do facial expressions but most of the time it isnt punchy enough and fails to communicate to the viewer properly.

Ok, let's try.
Base expression.

>>6549688
AI can't do exaggeration, that's for sure
AI can do Vtuber tier face expressions, that's it. Because you know, robots and stuff.

>Ilya-san... Not like this

>she must be angry because...?

>>6549704
Do angry then ahegao

>>6549686
sauce?

>>6549707
Modest Ilya.

>>6549717
Ilya, but her hair somehow got wet after I jerked some values up on my keyboard.

>>6549718
Her jacket is back again, since she's no longer steaming like a wrecked up boiler.

>>6549720
Uh, another one?

>>6549721
>hopium.jpg
Okay, maybe it's enough. Nette than Ilya, nuff said.

>sober bra design, younger version
Angst.jpg
But can it replace Ilya?

>>6549714
Some anti-AI fag's practice art

Well done pajeetnigger, well done. Thank god our jannies are worthless retards who can't be bothered to put a stop to aislop spam because they're too busy dilating their axe wounds. What a wonderful thread.

>>6549749
sage and report for spam retard. Don't bump.

>>6549749
The prompt was your post.

>>6549749
They have been removing ai threads left and right for the past week now, sometimes within 2 hours.

>>6549751
This isn't an AI art thread, retard.

>>6549749
The irony is that the Ai posters are the ones who're actually delivering content instead of bitching and complaining about it.

>>6549782
maybe because lots of people are quitting art or something

>>6549782
This isn't an accomplishment. Making AI art is as easy as writing a message to this board.

>>6549782
Maybe because how easy producing ai garbage is? You can make 30 ai images and post it within 20-30 mins, retard. It’s basically spam

>>6549785
>>6549788
Doens't matter, there's still content being created or generated or whatever you want to call it my point still stands as it's been said on this board many times before normies don't care how you created the content they just want it done.

>>6549791
doesn't

>>6549782
>you can't reply to the questions because umm uhh you just can't, OKAY?
>>6549788
I just shidded and farted.
>>6549795
Seethe.

>>6549791
You're not talking to normies. You're talking to people invested in drawing beyond the act of consuming. Content by itself isn't where the worth of this craft comes from, but from the human task of actually doing it. Posting a flood of content without acknowledging the context of this board and even this thread will not gain you any appreciation. You are merely filling the thread with noise.

>>6549814
Content, not noise and your end game for drawing is to deliver content to an audience. If you want to be a puritan about drawing, go paint inside a cave.

>>6549828
Sure thing, Rahshit

>>6549828
Hey nigger, how much AI shit is seen by a demanding audience?
Show me one famous AI work

>>6549836
The Ai work that won an art contest? The Ai work that is already being used by the Industry who got caught using "elements" of Ai? The Ai image which caused Roastoids to queef and seethe at the realistic group of idealized Women with hentai proportions?

Where are the faces?
Post your hand drawn works
AI cant into exaggeration and facial expressions

>>6549839
Don't move the goalpost ranjeed

>>6549841
I'm not, those were three notable examples of Ai created content that caused a commotion.

>>6549841
Whiter than you, Jaydun.

Do people even draw anymore on this board
Even the drawthreads are like this

>>6549854
It's just the resident pajeet shitting up the board every day around this hour. The threads are doing fine.

>>6549854
I draw, and I support Ai content for the sake of creating art. You know someone does not draw when they complain that Ai is removing clout from artists or that Ai isn't "real" art these kinds of people are not artists.

>>6549868
>>6549834

don't be misled, op doesn't care about whatever the thread topic is, he just wanted to fill the board with more ai spam. if he really cared about art in any capacity, ai or otherwise, he'd be drawing, or posting this in one of the 50 other ai generals spamming the website.

Anyone have not terrible resources for expressions? I like expressions more obvious than pajeet's garbage.

>>6549782
such amazing content
what a time to live in

kek

>>6549828
tell me you don't draw without telling me you don't draw.
gg

>>6549868
>I draw
Then I guess you must be pretty bad at it. Am I correct?

>>6549868
Shad said the same thing like those other “true artist” and their art is perma/beg/ tier.

>>6549893
>>6549891
These posts are textbook dunning krugers, coming from the peak of mt. stupid off the kruger chart.

>>6549828
>>6549834
>>6549836
>>6549839
>>6549840
>>6549841
>>6549842
>>6549853
>>6549854
>>6549857
>>6549868
>>6549872
>>6549875
>>6549877
>>6549886
>>6549887
>>6549891
>>6549893
>>6549895
DONUT STEEL

>>6549900
Checkem 00 dubs, niggers.

Why is there even a cooldown on reporting, man

>thread that could have been cool gets invaded by them again
It's not even funny or interesting.

>>6549933
Which one do you choose for reporting? Spamming or not poster's own work?

>>6549975
Whichever should get the janitor's attention

>ai
>Ai art?
You mean those bits that someone just created out of the blue with no effort or inspiration involved?
Oh booooooo-hooo!
I'm sorry you feel left behind but if you want to keep creating art in the future, you better get used to it.
AI is improving by leaps and bounds, while your skills are still stuck in analog age.
Weren't you talking just a few years ago that it will never be able to do what it can do now?
Cherry on top it is. Further advancements in the neuromorphic computing and biocomputing will make it possible for an AI to jump multiple heads above what it can do now. It can improve and innovate, something this board... is quite unable to do.
So don't hate the AI, hate yourself ;)

>>6550070
Based.

>>6549975
Either. A lot of ainiggers are filter evaders too.

>>6549978
I read something on another board about how these threads are being coddled by jannies because one of the head mods is a literal AI shill, he had no proof but I'd believe it.

AIslop is as off-topic to an artwork and critique board as spongebob is to /a/
>>6550127
I think /ic/ has like one janny, because occasionally a bunch of AI posts get removed in a row but other times they stay up for 8+hrs at a time, so probably when the janny is asleep. I wish /ic/ had /a/ tier nazi moderation

>>6550130
>has like one janny, because occasionally a bunch of AI posts get removed in a row but other times they stay up for 8+hrs at a time
Agreed. It's pretty obvious it's only 1 guy deleting posts

I stopped being angry at art long ago

>>6549686
And, Time!

13 Seconds! It's a new record!

>thred got derailed by AI
i cri everytime

>sketch something and slap a loose palette
>export to SD
>add a prompt
>Img2img the results with the best consistency
>take the result and do some corrective paintover
>took about 12 minutes
What's your problem, dicklets?

>>6550725
>look at how easy and fast it is to shit out blank expression kawaii uwu animu grill staring at the viewer in semi-realistic rendering
Blow it out your ass.

>>6550732
Let's see Anon's moe grill, shall we?
Or nothing says better 'quality art' like a crusty boomer doodle, right? All your smug is dust.
Is that what >trve and honest do nowadays?

>>6550732
Generic anime girls have value as an exercise in the artist's draftsmanship and application of collected knowledge. Outside of novelty there's no value in generic AI slop.
And for all the talk that AI is pushing art forwards AI users for some reason are hellbent on trying to appear as if they're real artists... like trannies trying to fool people they're real women despite gender being a social construct.

>>6550739
>it simply doesn't have any value, because ugh, it just doesn't, OKAY?
>>be (you), 20-something years ago
>>don't you understand, digital IS cheating, okay?
>>kvetch and rage all day round, digital stays here anyway
>>be totally not (you), present day, but the same story told
Sure, trannies can never be real women, since we have objective biological criteria to define what a woman is. Can you say the same about 'real artists'?
If you're that much of a purist, go into the cave and scribble on the walls, no one is stopping you.

>>6550746
Except the only 'cheating' in digital art is the undo button and some color fiddling. Everything else is the exact same as with traditional drawing

Your choice of arguments really reveal the kind of person you are.

>>6550738
>all those extra steps just to shit out some moeslop
pic related took me 5 minutes from imagination while jerking off and has way more expression than anything AI has shit out in the last year even if it's some shitty sketch of some generic big titty elf
I just love drawing and making lines with my own hands until an recognizable image takes shape.
I cum every time and it fulfills me.
I would never give that up for """"convenience""" or try to """impress normies"""
i lol and lmao at aitrannies
>>6550739
They want easy attention from others who are impressed because
>WOW ITS RENDERED LIKE A REAL PHOTOGRAPH WOW
that's the thing.
They have no talent, no brain, no plasticity, no genes, they are just mentally ill blobs who clutch themselves to anything to be acknowledged by other people much like trannies dress themselves in drag to gain attention; when it's negative attention they can just play the victim and circlejerk with other trannies. When it's positive attention, they can just circlejerk in the tranny communities to try to make all the other trannies jealous.

I thank God every single day for not having me made mentally ill.

>>6550747
>undo button
Erasing and overpainting have existed in art since time immemorial.

Jannie I appreciate your effort in cleaning up the thread.
But at this point just nuke it, there's nothing salvageable here anymore.

>>6550747
What a cute little bargain, isn't it?
It's just so convenient to define what is cheating and what is not when you're in a little trouble to keep up with the times.
I know it must be hard, and you're trying to preserve whatever you have of your little world in these changing times, alright?
Quite a burdensome task, isn't it?
Does it feel like a part of your very self is chipped away when the so-called "AI posters" happen to post here?
Oh well, a forced alienation from what makes you is what it must be.
But I don't wish you any of such things. You mold yourself into your own image, and you choose to adopt a persecution complex because someone dares to collide with that bubble you're in.
>>6550753
Oh, so you also consider getting some bread out of your drawer and the butter out of the fridge "an extra step" to make yourself a buttered sandwich? A baby must be really spoiled if it is so inconvenient for you to switch the tabs on your computer.
Anyway, it's all good. I use my tools, and you work with yours.
>>6550763
Remember that time sonic scribble by dall-e was posted? I do.

>>6550775
Are you that hbn1 retard faggot? You type like him all annoying and shit

>>6550775
>"so you consider [insert strawman projections here]"
What is the point of taking a shortcut to get to the end result as fast a possible to create nothing but mediocre outcomes you could've done faster and with more efficiency by yourself?
If you dislike creating so much that you're willing to just do anything to not do the work, but see art only as a tool to get attention, just say so.
Call yourself an artist or whatever, no one really gives a shit except other fags who use art to farm clout as well.

You hate art, you hate drawing and it makes you miserable, why are you still bothering yourself with it? Because it's the only means of getting any attention from online strangers whatsoever? Because you gonna be the best artist that ever was and kids on twitter will worship you and give you money for playing videogames and shitposting 24/7?

Man, what a pathetic existence.
Joke's on me though, you're loving this.

Now say something amongst the lines of
>you're mad coping seething beg schizo
Anon, i love the misery of others. I literally feed on it.

>>6550780
Literally who?
Idk who is that nameniggerfag.
>dem be anoyin' nshit
Come on, hit the weighs or go jerk off to the bathroom. You'll be better, I promise.

>>6549688
Some faces can't be explained with words. It's why reaction images exist

>>6550782
Oh, hello there. I guess you are that anonymous whose relentless autism takes the /ic/ drama threads to 300 and beyond whenever your autism feels cranked up enough. You also post UWU stickmen quite frequently. It seems like drama is your life, and since that is the case, I won't let you indulge in it fully. You may make the last post here; I don't mind. We're not in a kindergarten anyway to compete over who will have the last word in here.
Now that I'm done with this little introduction, I want to say that I find it peculiar that you changed your mind so quickly about whether AI assistance is a needless extra step in a supposed workflow or an easy shortcut.
I don't mind if you can't get an analogy either, since it was pretty clear that it mustn't be much of a nuisance switching tabs.
Speaking of work, if I didn't do anything, you wouldn't be here in the first place since the moegrill wouldn't have been posted.
I won't engage all about what IS art for you, but it seems to be a rather peculiar notion to think that the art is not supposed to be valued through the perspective of society.
You can be aloof and egotistical, creating something for yourself alone, withering on it like a Gollum... You can do it, sure. But I doubt it is a universal measure applied to the art as a whole.

>You hate art, you hate drawing, and it makes you miserable. Why are you still bothering yourself with it?
Yeah, sure. I am literally foaming right now. Oh, I hate it so much, you know, like so much.
>Because it's the only means of getting any attention from online strangers whatsoever?
Neat claim; nobody will test it anyway.
>Because you gonna be the best artist...
As if it were something bad, worship Mammon if you want to.
>>you're mad coping seething beg schizo
And you enjoy your autism-fueled rants. Enjoy your stay, bub.

>>6550796
If you call this drama, you haven't understood anything.

See the responses you've put forward
>You must be that guy
Already trying to namedrop, as to establish a visible target, for the reason to discredit the one saying the thing, rather than to argue the thing that's been said.
>answering rhetorical questions
No one asked about yourself but it sure goes to prove that my shot in the dark actually hit its mark. You showed that the focus of the discussion is not the art, but rather your own image and trying to measure your dick while claiming that this isn't a competition so you have an excuse later.
Your actions contradict what you say.
>i find it peculiar that you changed your mind
And now you're putting words into another's mouth to further attack the one who speaks, and strengthen your own position by virtue of "me", already having agreed with you.
>you don't get the analogy
No, i get it but it's just an excuse on your part.
You want to use the tools, okey, go ahead and do it, why do you feel the need to try to convince others of how
>easy and fast
It is? Because you're a fag who wants attention.

You wanted to bait and troll and sure you got a response, but in the end you only managed to play yourself.
>waaaah im not mad ur autistic lol lmao
Lurk moar, you low iq monkeytard.

>>6550775
Digital artists can draw traditional. AI niggers can't draw period.

Hang yourself on razor wire you lower than subhuman.

>>6549746
You nerds should get your own community instead of pretending that you're welcome here. Most of us despise you. Remember that.

>>6549872
You should call yourself a buttonpusher as it would be more accurate.

>>6550775
You people sicken me. The lack of self awareness coupled with your arrogant demeanor.. ugh.. there's a reason you've earned the title bugmen.

TL;DR:
Yu vill use ze AI, und yu vill be happy.

>>6550811
You know, wouldn't that be boring if you did exactly what I thought you will do?
>You must be that guy
Sure, you are. It's a doubtful practice to deny yourself of your own subjectivity. And your mild avatarfagging is what proves it to be the case.
From the threads I do remember, your post is nothing but a one in the line of your attemptz to draw attention to yourself using empty rhetoric and insults, wherever your autism strikes fancy. Your cheap tactics are transparent and ineffective; they only serve to demonstrate your utter lack of originality and emotional maturity. Your sophomoric attempts to engage in dialogue are tiresome and unimpressive, making it clear that you are more interested in trying to score 'points' than engaging in meaningful discussion. Your feeble argument completely falls apart when scrutinized, highlighting what a shallow and uninformed individual you truly are.
>No one asked about yourself
You did. Why shy away with answering what you are comfortable with asking? It's a sincere practice, at the very least.
>Not art
Its about art, it's the main topic after all. You chose to ask, and I've answered. Mind that much?
>changed your mind
Didn't you? After all, a shortcut and an extra step sound like they aren't on the very same end of a stick.
>You want to use the tools, okey
Sure. It also is convenient. Why someone would be a luddite when it comes to discussing such things anyway? After all, make a model from your very own art and ease your workflow, a pretty and elegant solution.
>easy and fast
Well, it might be. And it's what is curious about the purists on this board.
>>6550894
Well, it depends on how good they can manage that.
>>6550933
Yes, I'm in love with myself.

>>6550960
shut up, nerd

6550960
>reading comprehension is zero
>incoherent as fuck reply
>waaaah avatarfagging autism waaaah remember those threads uh? checkmate LET ME TELL YOU ABOUT MYSELF
>has no arguments, only personal attacks
>has no IQ
It's a fucking chatbot
holy shit

i'm alright, i guess