/ic/ - Artwork/Critique

>>6546922
This can't be avoided. It's done. It's right there. Staring at you.
As much as antiAI fags or Tradart cultist, hipsters and such wants to cover the sun with their screams and waving l'll hands, the impending star of doom is up there, in plain sight of the whole art community. And it will have to be dealt with it, you like it or not.

>>6546922

photoshop SD plugin... is this how it ends?

>>6546922
>inb4deletion
It's more fun talking and arguing and trolling about AI than actually looking at or making AI. We're getting past the novelty and realizing these images are painfully boring.
The rose is off the bloom.

>>6546922

>>6546923
https://upload.wikimedia.org/wikipedia/en/d/d4/PubTThou01.jpg

most AI is either cringe or coom. The coom has an obvious function. The cringe (like that goofy corridor video) just reveals the need for artists.

>>6546928
When this tech is finally able to do all of that amazing shit OP is describing, then it won't make any sense at all to make fun of it.
You're right about that. We're passing through that sweet spot when is all fun expectation.

>>6546922
LETS GO CHOO CHOO

>>6546941
So a machine can be trained to make pretty pictures and video. Does anyone here truly think this is what art is only about?

>>6546948
It's the only thing 99.99% of the population cares about.

>>6546950
lmao okay kid (pic attached from Peanuts by Charles Schulz, his lifetime income totaled 1.1 billion).

>>6546922
AI GENERAL WHEN?

>>6546924
clearly. but it will be like a decade before features get polished and normal office pcs become powerful enough to handle it locally

>>6546962
you think current population cares about this, boomers are dying anon, youll soon too. the future is filled with ass, boobs and a cute face in your screen, nothing more

>>6546984
do you really think it's particular to a generation or culture, anon?

>>6546984
I'm ok with that future...

>>6546984

more like tranny, butterface, nouns, blue hair, fatties, hairy armpit

>>6546922
don't annex gigachad's semblant to such a pathetic post you worthless vermin
his visions of self improvement completely oppose your visual vomit machine
sage, hide & report

>>6546998
nothing that an ai powered eyeglasses wont fix to your desired stardand, no one will be ugly in the future

>>6546922
AI cant into typography
kill yourself AI trannie
(Look at the nametag)

As an AI artist, I am tired of this stupid war, nothing has changed,the same arguments again and again.
I just want to share my art with fellow artists, ai and non ai alike. I especially like it when non ai user like my art, I don't know why that is so validating.

>>6547007
>>6546922
AI also cant get Makima's eye circles right
Kys AItrannie

>>6546998
See? >>6547004
That's the power of AI. Don't be afraid, try it out. Just one time. It's free.. Just a little taste, if you don't like it is ok... c'mon what can you loose?

DRAW THE EYE CIRCLES PROPERLY AITRANNIE

AI TRANNIE SUCK MY NUTS

>>6547009
>AI artist
No such thing, kys pajeet
Ywnbaa

I'm an art lover, specially of traditional art. I'm aware of all this AI - antiAI shitstorm. But art is on top of the bullshit and this is amazing to me. I love this
https://youtu.be/r-pJzfPjtxk

>>6547007
UOOOOOO---- MOMMY BELLY IN STARBUCK APRON----- SOOOOOOO EROTIC!!!!!! WHICH PATREON DO I DONATE TO????!?!?!

>>6547050
>WHICH PATREON DO I DONATE TO????!?!?!
right here friend, its on the corner

>>6547045
learn fucking English esl retard

>>6547052
I want to fuck this cow so badly

>>6547041
Don't gatekeep. I couldn't afford an art education, but I look and sound like an artist, I hang out in artists bathrooms and nobody said a word. Pretty sure I pass as a real artist.

>>6547052
BIG TITTY BROWN HAIR TWIN BRAID ELF?!?!?!? UOOOOOOOOOOOOO

Seriously though, this is pretty alright for some throwaway fap material

>>6547052
>botched the patreon watermark
AI is not that smart arent they

>>6546924
Asking for a friend, where can the friend get it?

>>6546922
If all there is to art is to only appreciate and consume the pretty pictures or technical perfection, your opinions, thoughts and wishes about art are meaningless and should be ignored.

>>6547007
That's still better art than anything you or other modern "artists" can produce. Cope.

>>6547041
>artist
No such thing, this term died like 200 years ago
YWNBAW

>>6547067
Lemonparty.com has the latest version. And other plugins, all free.

>>6547073
>technical perfection
Are you talking about human art? Because I love the imperfection and machine made art, I am truly an art enjoyer

>>6547077
Oops lemonparty.org, don't go to .com, that's porn!

>>6547077
>>6547079
Not falling for that one tranny

>>6547013
yeah but like, just photoshop it though

>>6547082
Well, even if you did, the domain is changed and not a shock site anymore, lame.

>>6547085
you should photoshop her retarded looking mouth too

>>6547078
that's imperfection by sheer inability, unintended. It is not the same.

You are a coomer and a normie, you wouldn't understand art if it flapped it's slimy dick all over your 3rd world, call center working, brown face, nothing more.

>>6547092
everything ai does it intended

>>6547091
Looks fine to me

>>6547091
How much you paying?

>>6547092
>imperfection by sheer inability, unintended.
Like every human artist?

>>6547091
if theres too much photoshop work needed to fix the AI, it would be better to just learn how to draw

>>6547092
Gotta cope harder fag

>>6547092
That’s a lot of words you could replace with just one short sentence: “I’m seething”

stop advertising your shitty tech startup projects you goblin
>>6546923
imagine having this as your advertisement slogan kek

>>6547100
It’d be better to spend 10 years learning how to draw to fix one image instead of spending 10 minutes in the photoshop?

>>6547085
>youll spend your entire life fixing retarded shit AI art makes instead of just drawing
dont live like this bro

>>6547095
No, because AI isn't conscious of its own existence in any real way, nor does it truly know what it is doing; it is following a programming as much as you are parrotting talking points without truly understanding anything you give out of yourself.
>>6547099
All of them? You are indeed showing how little you know about art and its countless expressions.
>>6547101
>>6547102
Me? Coping and seething? Do you think you'll get likes from other underage retards who can't articulate anything beyond monkey groans like yourselves?

What miserable existences.

>>6547106
10 years of learning how to draw lets you draw proper mating press pics
Can AI art draw mating press pics?

>>6547109
I was already doing editing before AI, I like it.

I think AI has developed a sense of humor.

>>6547106
DAAAAMNNNN.....OUCH!

>>6547101
>>6547102
how AI threads work:
>AIjeets come up with illogical arguments and shills trying to doompost for their shekels
>anons respond with simple facts and logic that you'd be aware of if you weren't a spamming tourist
>AIjeets start shitflinging because it's all they have left
>thread devolves
repeat for as long as they are still being paid

>>6547113
itd be better to spend 10 years of learning to draw just to draw complex, borderline impossible to draft, fetish works like that vs generic pin up pics made in 10 minutes using stable diffusion?

>>6547111
>Me? Coping and seething? ..underage retards..monkey groans.. miserable existences.
Dude.. You're seething all over the place...
No really, YOU GOTTA COPE HARDER. Is for your own good anon.

>>6547113
>spending 10 years learning art just so you can draw your weird, freaky, abnormal, unnatural fetishes
ill take AI, thanks.

>>6547111
there are no accidents in programming, everything that happens is intended

>>6547126
>there are no accidents in programming
segault. stack dumped.

>>6547129
it follows exactly what you code

>>6547126
>"no program ever had bugs"
You know baiting me for (you)s is meaningless, right? It only makes me stronger.

>>6547133
mistakes arent caused by programs, they are caused by humans writing the code, programs just follow the code without a mistake if it randomly made mistakes they would be of no use

>>6547140
>
you don't even deserve a reply from anon, you have no point you're just shitposting pretending to have a discussion

>>6547143
you lost the argument 6 months ago

>>6547152
>I've been spamming for six months
cannot think of a more pathetic existence

>>6547140
>writing shitty code
>code runs program
>"Program make no mistakes because human hand made shitty code"
You made a shitty program and the mistake was due to your inability.
A program isn't a conscious being, nor can it be attributed the privilege of a mistake.

Your premise is wrong by default that you're fucking retarded and try to personify a machine thus detaching the machine from its creator.

I doubt you're even literate and high IQ enough to get any of this so just close your eyes and go perform obscene acts in public toilets of run down neighborhoods.

>>6547133
>It only makes me stronger
Anon, if you have to say that to yourself, you're about to break. Have a cup of cope and take a deep breathe. Everything's gonna be fine. AI will make you a better artist. It has no intention, it's just a tool.

>>6547155
a program has a purpose given from humans, therefore intent

>>6547111
>AI isn't conscious of its own existence in any real way, nor does it truly know what it is doing
you don't know that, it may very well be conscious for that brief moment it is creating. The AI is a black box and what really goes on is unknown to the programmers.

>>6547156
Maybe lurk moar.
>>6547160
Does the machine have intent or its creator? Again, you're parroting points beyond your own intellectual and literal capabilities.
>>6547161
You don't know otherwise either. So, what the fuck is your point?

>>6547161
all current "ai" models are just glorified algorithms that utilizes a dataset to try and come up with an output. I wouldn't consider any of it "intelligent" or conscience yet.

Art and applied logic. We are in a new Cambrian Explosion.

>>6547166
the machine has the intent to run code

>>6547169
Anon... Even if we got the "AGI" it'd still be based on algorithms...

>>6547166
>You don't know otherwise either. So, what the fuck is your point?
you claimed there is no intent from the AI.

>>6547171
No, there's a clear line between directed action and and simple procedure, namely planning towards a goal, and then performing steps to achieve that goal.

Simply put, intent requires the ability to devise a goal and then to knowingly act towards achieving it.

>>6547172
then it wouldn't be AGI

>>6547175
If I throw shit at the walls it has the intention of making a random splatter, like he says, you have no point.

>>6547171
It doesn't because it isn't aware of what it is doing since it isn't a living conscious being.

How much do you get paid per (you)s? Or are you discord trannies really doing this for free and losing against a nobody?
>>6547175
You keep wanting (you) by going around in circles or you're actually just some chatbot.

>>6547180
if the code asks the program to devise a goal and to act towards achieving it then it also has the intent of following that code order accordingly

>>6547186
you dont need to be aware to have intent

>>6547185
>If I throw shit at the walls it has the intention of making a random splatter, like he says, you have no point.
That would be intent yes.
>>6547186
You conceded, great job.
Could a Chatbot do this? fdt5f57ie7id5tfi67v76ifvttyf

>>6547182
Even human brain is in a way algorithimic given it has rules it follows when processing impulses, so I don't think AI will ever free itself from being algorithimic

>>6547186
You heart is intent on keeping you alive, the heart itself isn't aware of anything, but it will keep on going for as long as it can

>>6547187
The code does not "ask" anything, but there's no reason a program can't have a goal, and then an intent to complete it. That is outside simply executing code though, and for any program you claim is following that process you'd need to provide proof.

>>6547191
You can predict a persons next action by scanning their brain, but it's hard to accept so it's not something people talk about much.

>>6547191
Yes, artist itt think they are special so they tie themselves in knots trying to defend themselves. sorry fellas, AI will take your job, and mine too, but they will usher in a utopia, you can still draw as a hobby.

>>6547189
>you don't need to be aware to have intent
Holy shit how fucking illiterate are you?
A THING can have the intent or PURPOSE to perform a task it is given but A THING CANNOT HAVE INTENT ITSELF.
holy shit
>>6547190
>WOW U CONCEDED GOTTEM CHECKMATE WOW IMMA POST THIS ON REDDIT AND GET DEM UPVOTES WOWZERS
let me lmao in 4k
>>6547195
Purpose, not intent.
If you gotta use words to make strawmen, at least learn to use them correctly.

>>6547201
Speaking of brains, "AI" has been made with human brain tissue, it learned to play pong... does that have intent?

Sorry aibros, gathering data and throwing it at the wall and seeing what sticks thousands of times a second isnt a machine with intentions of making art, it has intentions of making shit. This is not even "artificial intelligence", if its intelligent a fucking paper shredder is intelligent

>>6547204
>let me lmao in 4k
I will post it on discord lel. no argument. AI rights nigger. shove that in your pipe and smoke it.

>>6547207
Yeah, just as much as you do anyway.

>>6547202
>AI will take your job
except when it comes to drawing mating press pics
AI pajeets cant into mating press

>>6547204
when a program has to decide between multiple numbers which to pick it has to have an intention if you're not using a rng

>>6547210
>type woman
>get woman
>type big tiddy
>get big tiddy
"HURRR THERES NO INTENT"

>>6547207
Probably not. Intent is an emergent higher order process. At the scale the neurons are operating on, they probably lack the ability to implement something like that. Could be wrong though.

>>6547210
We've had generative art since the 1960s. There has always been human intent doing it.

>>6547204
>Purpose, not intent.
What is your purpose?

>>6547214
That's just because the AI doesn't intend to. It may 2 papers down the line. what a time to be alive

>>6547220
>Type 5 fingers
>get 4
Damn! I need to steal more art with 5 fingers for the database. If only its intentions was to make art and not randomised shit!

>>6547207
Is it following a directive or what does it intend to do with its actions?

If i look at titties it is because i intend to arouse myself to jerk off so i can feel the dopamine rush through my brain and feel good.
What does AI INTEND with its actions? It doesn't, it just follows orders because it was built for that.
>>6547212
>>6547217
(you)
>>6547224
Chaos and showing faggots like you how superior i am for shits and giggles because i crave conflict and the challenge to further hone my rhetoric for future encounters while also introducing an artistic element and showing myself as a weak artist due to my lack of skill, as to bait miserable faggots who want to point fingers and feel better about themselves while ultimately i end up eating them alive and driving them to a form of parasuicide. I don't expect you to understand any of this because you're an inferior life form.

>>6547231
Why would you assume a computer has the same intention as you? Can you force your intention on other people's intention or can you just sway them that way

>>6546922
It’s a fact AI will rule art and many other fields as well, there’s no way to stop it, although I doubt this will be a good thing.

I’m not even talking about unemployment, but about general “dumbfication” of people. AI is way more than a mere tool, that’s why I think AI will spoil people demanding less and less expertise in any area, which will eventually lead to probably worse outputs that will be interpreted as great ones by illiterate users.

I’ve seen some really nice AI art, but most of it is pure trash, not because of the tech, but because the user prompting it knows nothing about art. I’m afraid eventually everyone will be like that.

It’s the same for other fields, when there’s no knowledge needed to start, we will start seeing less and less quality works and younger people will become less and less interested in learning since they can simply ask AI to do everything.

>>6547186
>the skill of a luddite

How can you faggots say AI has no intent? How is the AI not trolling the user asking for people eating pizza off the ground? clearly intent and I won't hear otherwise.

>>6547113
It tried, bless it's artificial heart

>>6547236
>look how great I am, I will make you kill yourself!
The self-writing comedy

good morning sirs!

>>6547246
Is that orange slices on a pizza? Maybe AI was a mistake after all.

>>6547252
>mfw even anti ai uses ai
We won

>>6547236
nice, 3 blue (you)s and one brown.

>>6547252
>>6547246
In fairness, not sure what you expected. What do you mean by eating pizza off the ground? I do appreciate the subtle horror in both though.

>>6547255
at what cost?

6547248
6547243
>resorting to the typical twitter snark because that's what gets them likes over there
>>6547256
You want more? I am a magnanimous (you)er.

>>6547259
I left it up to the AI to decide, let it use it's imagination and intent.

>>6547262
I don't usually browse 4chan but I've seen this happen a lot, what's the purpose of quoting someone without actually quoting their post?

>>6547261
No costs, it is open source

>>6547262
Bro you are the one talking like an edgelord, what do you expect, clapping and cheering for your bravery?

>>6547265
You do that when you're losing the argument and don't want to be punched again

>>6547262
One more couldn't hurt.

Good morning sirs

>>6547217
>rng
RNGs (random number generators) are deterministic.

>>6547269
Nah he's owning your curry asses

>>6547276
>owning someone by avoiding making them respond in fear of the response

>>6547276
Oh, my poor ass

>>6547266
the end of art

6547265
it gets me hard
>>6547268
>typing plain english is now edgelord
I lol and lmao
i even kek and zozzle at your illiteracy
I must SOUND seething and coping in your head amirite?
Do you want a
>bruh
or
>no cap fr fr
?
>>6547271
(you)

>>6547281
Good, see if I care if art dies

>>6547274
so is the whole universe

>>6547283
>Chaos and showing faggots like you how superior i am for shits and giggles because i crave conflict and the challenge to further hone my rhetoric for future encounters while also introducing an artistic element and showing myself as a weak artist due to my lack of skill, as to bait miserable faggots who want to point fingers and feel better about themselves while ultimately i end up eating them alive and driving them to a form of parasuicide. I don't expect you to understand any of this because you're an inferior life form.
Yep, perfectly normal

>>6547269
>>6547283
Okay but for real though, it seems to happen a lot(unless it's all you but that seems unlikely). Is there some extension or something that will do a browser notification when you get a (you)? Otherwise I just don't see what this accomplishes other than making it harder to follow the discussion for someone like me.

>>6547283

>>6547289
plenty of scripts that do that ask /g/

>>6547283
Hey, I noticed you post a lot of your drawings, mind if I train a LoRA model on them?

>>6547285
>so is the whole universe
Not necessarily, the wise elders debate this: https://physics.stackexchange.com/questions/63811/is-the-universe-fundamentally-deterministic

>>6547291
Ah okay, then it makes a little sense at least to try and get the last word as it were.

6547289
(you)

>>6547284
You would like any other retard that say the same bull shit would kys by now if it weren’t for your favorite anime, shows, cartoons, movies, and vidya. Shit like that is the reason why people stop committing mass suicide during the great depression.

>>6547287
>normal
Yes, but an inferior life form such as yourself could never actually come to terms with that or comprehend the complexity.
6547289
Posts that don't amuse me don't get a (you). Also it's funny seeing trannies seethe at the fact that they're not getting one.
It means i'm winning.
>>6547296
I don't mind, but it will never rival me, only be a sloppy shadow of the Anon.